My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 03152022
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2022
>
PL PACKET 03152022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2022 10:35:28 AM
Creation date
3/14/2022 10:35:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />February 15, 2022 <br />Page 6 <br />1 <br />2 Chair Socha asked Mr. Grittman how would it look procedurally for the City Council to hold <br />3 a public meeting. Mr. Grittman stated he recommends the Commission recommend to City <br />4 Council to call for a public hearing to consider rezoning of the property to a higher residential <br />5 zoning district. <br />6 <br />7 Motion by Chair Socha, seconded by Commissioner Erickson, to recommend the City Council <br />8 call a public hearing for the topic of rezoning the map for this area to R-4. <br />9 <br />10 Motion carried 6-0-1 (Commissioner Rude abstained). <br />11 <br />12 IV.STAFF REPORTS – NONE. <br />13 <br />14 V.OTHER BUSINESS. <br />15 <br />A.16 Potential Amendment of Uses in the City’s Commercial and Industrial Zoning <br />17 Districts. <br />18 <br />19 Mr. Grittman provided a memorandum containing the prior discussion of potential <br />20 amendment of uses in the City’s Commercial and Industrial zoning districts, and adds a table- <br />21 form list of proposed amended language for Planning Commission consideration. There are <br />22 references in the Comprehensive Plan related to this review, and the current districts are vague <br />23 and in some cases archaic in their language. Changes to consider would be to usage and goals <br />24 for each of the two districts. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to implement the goals <br />25 of the Comprehensive Plan, but often, it is the Zoning Ordinance that does the “heavy lifting” <br />26 of purpose and general nature of these districts. <br />27 <br />28 The table provided includes current language and proposed changes in redline. Text that is <br />29 proposed to carryover from the existing code is referenced in the second column. The third <br />30 column includes changes to each of the proposed sections. The fourth column provides some <br />31 commentary explaining the purpose of the changes. At this time the boundaries of these <br />32 districts will not be addressed. The Comprehensive Plan’s recommendations are to retain the <br />33 existing zoning pattern, with the primary change being a consideration of integrating more <br />34 residential development into the commercial zones. <br />35 <br />36 Mr. Grittman stated there is no time pressure so this could be reviewed for some time. He <br />37 reviewed some of the types of businesses that fall under the Commercial District. He did the <br />38 same for the Industrial District. <br />39 <br />40 Mr. Grittman stated the Planning Commission is asked to provide comments and thoughts on <br />41 the proposals, after which Staff will prepare formal ordinance amendments for a public <br />42 hearing. <br />43 <br />44 Commissioner Hendrickson asked about the conditions for the Commercial District and <br />45 referred to hospitality uses and in particular eating and drinking facilities are required to be <br />46 outside 250 feet from R-1 or R-2 whereas some other Commercial uses are not. She asked
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.