My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05172022
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2022
>
PL PACKET 05172022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2022 1:40:39 PM
Creation date
5/12/2022 1:40:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 17, 2022 <br />Page 2 <br />Those 1940s and 1950s homes were designed and built when it was common for households to have <br />(maybe) a single car, and limited need to storage space. Current lifestyles have changed that <br />dramatically, with two or more personal automobiles the norm, and a significant increase in the need <br />(or at least desire) for more personal storage. <br />In some communities, desirable land values have driven a trend (and a concurrent controversy) toward <br />tear-downs and replacement on small single family lots with homes of much larger mass – reduced <br />setbacks, taller multi-story homes that have raised issues of shadowing and neighborhood architectural <br />character. <br />Complicating this exercise further is an interest – and need – in managing stormwater and flood control, <br />which has historically been an issue for the community. Every increase in square footage will have a <br />cumulative impact on treatment of stormwater. Thus, there are certain to be other mitigating factors to <br />consider before any changes are made to lot buildability. Staff has asked the City Engineer to provide <br />some discussion of management techniques the City may consider if increased impervious surface is a <br />limiting design element. <br />In the sketches below, we have created three scenarios for Planning Commission consideration and <br />comment. They represent common – although not every – type of single family lot/building <br />arrangement. Each sketch includes a few options to consider for potential reductions in building <br />setbacks. Each will accommodate some measure of new building opportunities for homeowners, but <br />will also have impacts on both lot usage and neighborhood character. <br />Staff would like to discuss each option at the upcoming Planning Commission meeting to determine the <br />levels of acceptability, and perhaps the pros and cons of each idea. From this discussion, we would <br />hope to gain clarity as to what outstanding questions there might be – and what additional research the <br />Commission would like staff to conduct. Eventually, we hope to arrive at a consensus as to the possible <br />changes, at which time we would prepare formal ordinance language to be considered at a public <br />hearing. <br />For reference, the typical requirements for a single family home in St. Anthony are as follows: <br />Lot Area – 9,000 square feet Corner Lot – 11,000 square feet <br />Lot Width – 75 feet Corner Lot – 90 feet <br />Front Setback – 30 feet from property line(ROW)Corner lot – 30 feet from both rights of way <br />Side Setback – 5 feet minimum, 15 feet total between the two sides <br />Rear Setback – 25 feet, or 20% of the depth of the lot <br />Impervious Surface – 35% for lots >9,000 sf Impervious Surface - 40% for lots <9,000 sf <br />Building Height – 25 feet/2 stories <br />Encroachments – Various site elements (patios, decks, stairs, and other features) generally extend 5 feet <br />into the required front setback, and to a 5 foot setback in side or rear yards
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.