Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />May 17, 2022 <br />Page 2 <br />1 Councilmember Webster provided background information on the goal setting that has <br />2 occurred in recent years. She thanked the Commission noting that some of the goals related to <br />3 planning are in addition to the normal workload of the Commission and helps the City address <br />4 trends and plan for the future. She stated that each of the steps is meant to bring them closer <br />5 to accomplishing the pyramid mission statement. She welcomed any questions the <br />6 Commission may have. <br />7 <br />8 Commissioner Erickson asked for more details on changes that were made. Councilmember <br />9 Webster noted a boxed area that denotes some of the changes from 2021 to 2022 and <br />10 highlighted some of those changes and/or additions. She also provided details on the <br />11 proposed resident survey, noting that a link will be available for residents that are not chosen <br />12 for the sampling to still complete the survey. <br />13 <br />14 Chair Socha commented that sometimes the discussions of the Planning Commission go <br />15 beyond the scope of planning, including economic development. She asked if it would be <br />16 appropriate for the Commission to also forward comments on other topics in the pyramid <br />17 outside of planning, as many elements work together, and the Commission members care <br />18 about more than just planning topics. Councilmember Webster acknowledged the complexity <br />19 of some of the issues brought before the Planning Commission. She agreed that it is hard to <br />20 only view something in one lens because issues are intertwined. She welcomed those <br />21 comments as it helps her to think about unintended consequences and different perspectives. <br />22 <br />23 Commissioner Hendrickson referenced a new item that mentions comparing greenspace to <br />24 density in Silver Lake Village and asked for more details. Councilmember Webster <br />25 referenced the gas station complex at 39th and Stinson Boulevard which the City purchased <br />26 several years ago. She stated that there has been a proposal to build 38 units with the same <br />27 floor plan that was already constructed to the south and therefore they are attempting to be <br />28 mindful of the greenspace that is available. She noted that the highest concentration of <br />29 children live in apartments, and they do not always have walkable access to greenspace. She <br />30 stated that they may need to be more intentional about where they plan for greenspace. <br />31 <br />32 Commissioner Hendrickson agreed that there is a lot of asphalt in that area and there would be <br />33 a great potential for improvement in that area. <br />34 <br />B.35 R-1 Zoning Amendments Discussion <br />36 <br />37 City Planner Grittman explained the purpose of this item is to initiate a discussion over the <br />38 potential for expanding buildable area on single family parcels in St. Anthony. The simple <br />39 impetus for this discussion is to consider whether there are opportunities to allow for more <br />40 significant reinvestment in existing housing stock given a changing expectation for single <br />41 family home design. He noted St. Anthony has demonstrated a strong interest in its single- <br />42 family neighborhoods for a variety of reasons. <br />43 <br />44 Chair Socha stated that she did not see anything in the report proposing a change from the 35 <br />45 to 45 percent impervious surface requirements and asked if that is proposed to stay the same. <br />46 Mr. Grittman stated that the engineer does not recommend changing those numbers but noted