CC PACKET 10112022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

October 11, 2022 Page 4 southerly access point would also serve the drive-through lane that loops to the ATM window on the west side of the building. A total of 31 parking spaces serve the building, a ratio of one space per 123 square feet gross. The zoning ordinance requires at least one space per 300 square feet. The proposal is easily consistent with this aspect of the code. The drive-through gains its access from this southerly driveway. The drive-through appears to have stacking space for as many as six to seven vehicles, with a “by-pass” lane for vehicles that decide to leave the queue. For ATM-only service, this stacking amount should easily serve peak use of the facility. The bank also includes a walk-up vestibule with additional ATM services as a part of the main banking lobby. A second access drive is shown north of the building, connecting the private street to the north portion of the bank driveway. In the northeast corner of the site, an internal driveway connection would be made to the future development on the north portion of the subject parcel. As noted, driveway easements would be required to ensure that all parcels have continued access throughout the PUD area. Building Materials. Building Materials are a combination of primarily brick, glass, and cast stone with metal panel accents. The building itself would be as high as 22 feet to the top of the highest parapet, well under the maximum 35 foot building height. No issues with materials or general design are evident. Signage. No signage information has been included with the permit request. It should be noted that under the general sign requirements, each freestanding business location is permitted to have two signs, with total area based on the code requirements applied to the site in question. One of those signs may be a monument sign. Staff note on signage following the Planning Commission meeting: On the site currently exist two freestanding signs. One is in the southeast corner of the Chase site, and is proposed to remain in place. That sign is a monument sign identifying various tenants of the Silver Lake Village shopping district. The other existing sign is on the developer/owner’s property in the northeast corner of the site, the former Walmart freestanding sign. This sign is no longer applicable to the overall project area. Approval of the Ruby project included a requirement for separate signage approvals consistent with the requirements of the City’s sign regulations. As such, it is expected that this abandoned sign should be removed as a condition of this amendment approval. Separate sign permitting will be a requirement for identification on the proposed Chase building, and will need to take the current monument sign into account. The conditions of approval incorporated into the Planning Commission’s recommendation have been amended to more specifically address this aspect of the plan.