My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 10252022
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2022
>
CC MINUTES 10252022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2022 9:11:21 AM
Creation date
11/10/2022 9:11:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />October 25, 2022 <br />Page 3 <br />Maintenance was provided for Council review. Maps showing the location of the two sites were <br />also provided. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked what type of maintenance is required on a dog park. Mr. Yunker <br />stated they were more focused on location at this point. It would need nearly daily maintenance. <br />Residents would be asked to clean up after their dogs but City Staff would be the backfill. <br />8 Councilmember Walker asked why Site A is preferable to Site B. Mr. Yunker stated it is a <br />9 bigger area and more centrally located and the noise would not be affecting the neighborhood <br />10 over the highway noise. Councilmember Walker stated his concern would be the height of the <br />11 fence. <br />12 <br />13 Councilmember Webster thanked Mr. Yunker and appreciated the research done on this matter. <br />14 The Ann Arbor report was helpful in looking at the two possible sites. She stated she would <br />15 move ahead with further exploration of a dog park in St. Anthony. Residents have expressed <br />16 interest in a dog park where they can take their dogs off -leash. <br />17 <br />18 Mayor Stille stated Council needs to be realistic in looking at this. The Ann Arbor report <br />19 showed parking as key. There would not be good parking at the 37u Avenue site. One of his <br />20 greatest concerns is phosphorus going into the drainage ditch from the dog feces. He would like <br />21 to hear what the City Engineer would say about that. The usable space at the site is much smaller <br />22 if a fence was constructed. Those are barriers he has concerns with. <br />23 <br />24 Councilmember Jenson stated he would not be in favor of cutting down trees to allow for a dog <br />25 park. The liquid urine will go right into the ground and there is no way to clean it up. It would <br />26 take a significant amount of maintenance. He is on the fence as the site is so small. <br />27 <br />28 Councilmember Walker referred to the report and said those residents that really wanted it would <br />29 hopefully volunteer to keep it clean. He would like to move forward with further research of a <br />30 dog park. <br />31 <br />32 Mayor Stille stated he would be interested in knowing more but does not want to take a lot of <br />33 Charlie's time to research. Mr. Yunker stated he can check with the County whether it is an <br />34 option. He suggested staff explore it a little more. <br />35 <br />36 VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL. <br />37 <br />38 A. Resolution 22-075 — Approving the City of St. Anthony's Participation in a Joint Powers <br />39 Agreement for a Fence Consortium with Several Hennepin County Police Agencies. <br />40 <br />41 Police Captain Jeff Spiess reviewed in the spring of 2021, several police agencies in Hennepin <br />42 County expressed interest in exploring the possibility of using shared resources to secure a <br />43 fencing/barrier system to protect critical city infrastructure in the event of a civil unrest situation. <br />44 The goal was to have an anti -scale fencing structure readily available, within close proximity that <br />45 could be set up within hours. A Fence Working Group was formed with members of several <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.