Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br />hearing to a future specific time and date when additional information is required <br />prior to Planning Commission action. <br />h.Discussion. Once the hearing is closed, the Chair invites members to discuss <br />the issue. The purpose of discussion is to ensure that adequate information has <br />been gathered to formulate a motion. The Commission may ask staff, applicant, <br />or members of the public for clarification of specific points. <br />F.Following discussion, a motion for action on the item should be made. Motion may be <br />to recommend approval, recommend denial, or to table action. If the hearing was <br />continued (see g. above), a motion to table action would be in order. The Planning <br />Commission should be aware of any “60-Day Rule” issues relating to the amount of <br />time for a decision. <br />a.A motion for action must be seconded. Occasionally, a member may request <br />that a specific motion be amended to include additional language, such as a <br />new condition or to refer to certain findings. For most circumstances, this is <br />done by requesting that the motion-maker and the second accept a “friendly <br />amendment”, without separate votes on the amendment. <br />b.If the motion-maker and/or second do not accept the “friendly amendment”, a <br />member may make a motion to have a formal vote to amend the original motion <br />– this is a rare occurrence in informal meeting settings such as a Planning <br />Commission. <br />c.Once the language of the motion is agreed to, the Chair calls for a vote. For <br />most zoning-related items, a simple majority of members present carries the <br />item. <br />d.Special situations: <br />i.If a motion to deny or approve fails to receive a simple majority (either <br />gains only a minority or ends in a tie vote), the Chair should declare that <br />the motion fails, and ask those who voted against the motion to state <br />their reasons on the record. Under this scenario, the item goes to the <br />City Council without a recommendation from Planning Commission, with <br />the stated reasons servings as the “findings”. <br />ii.In the alternative, a member may make a substitute motion and the <br />Commission may consider it separately. <br />G.After all items on the adopted agenda have been disposed of, the Chair may entertain <br />a motion to adjourn. This is considered a non-debatable motion, and should proceed <br />directly to a vote after it has been seconded. <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />The City’s Comprehensive Plan is a document that describes the community’s vision of itself <br />in the future. The enabling planning statutes (found in Minn. Stat. §462.351 through <br />§462.364) give a community the authority to plan and manage land use and related facilities <br />(such as transportation, utilities, and other functions) to accomplish specific objectives. <br />These objectives are quoted as follows: <br />The legislature finds that municipalities are face with mounting problems in <br />providing means of guiding future development of land so as to insure a safer,