Laserfiche WebLink
8 <br />missing, or are ineligible due to conflict of interest. The City’s Attorney should be consulted in <br />these cases to ensure that the proper voting requirements have been met. <br />It should be noted that for the Planning Commission, no super-majority vote comes into play. <br />As an advisory board, the Commission passes on its recommendation by simple majority <br />vote. <br />It is important to remember that zoning amendments are adopted by enactment of a new <br />ordinance. This includes both text amendments and rezonings of property. The City needs to <br />put the proposed amendment in the form of an ordinance, adopt it by the required vote, then <br />publish it as with any other ordinance before it becomes effective. <br />Challenges . Zoning amendments are occasionally litigated. The standard of review is <br />“rational basis”, and the basis Cities should rely on is direction from the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The factors listed above, and the quality of the record documenting the proposal’s <br />consistency with those factors, will often be determinative in legal disputes involving rezoning <br />requests. As a rule, the City has broad discretion to consider zoning patterns, and their <br />relationship to the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Conditional Use Permits <br />Conditional Use - A type of land use in a particular district which is presumed to be allowed, <br />but requires special, additional standards and review due to the existence of some aspect of <br />the use which may create a nuisance or place an extraordinary burden on public services. <br />Conditional Use Permits, once granted, are considered to be permanent, without need for <br />renewal, so long as the conditions applied to the permit are maintained. A Conditional Use <br />Permit may be transferred to other persons, again as long as they continue to meet the <br />original conditions. The exception to this “permanence” is when the use lapses for more than <br />one year. In that case, the property must apply for a new CUP if they wish to reinstate the <br />use. <br />Disputes . Conditional Use Permits are, by far, the most commonly litigated zoning matter. <br />Whereas the development of Comprehensive Plans allows the City to exercise the most <br />discretion, Conditional Use Permits allow, typically, the least. The general standard for the <br />City is that if the conditions are met by the permittee, the City has very little discretion to deny <br />the CUP request. Moreover, conditions must be rationally related to the impacts created by <br />the proposed use. <br />Basis of R eview . The Zoning Ordinance applies two sets of conditions in the review of any <br />Conditional Use Permit application - general conditions applying to all CUPs which serve as <br />the basis for findings of approval or denial, and specific conditions listed with each individual <br />use in the Zoning Ordinance district section. <br />The first set of conditions is as follows: