Laserfiche WebLink
minnesota.uli.org 10 <br />• Land value and the success of existing retail. The relative success of the existing shopping centers and <br />the price of the underlying land may deter developers because it will likely be expensive to acquire the <br />parcels. The existing uses are in something of a difficult middle ground–neither wildly successful with the <br />highest and best land use nor dilapidated and blighted. <br />• Tax Increment Financing may not be achievable. TIF districts are popular tools for enabling <br />redevelopment by making it less costly to do so. However, the relative success and stability of the study <br />area makes it unlikely that existing structures would qualify for a “substandard” finding. <br />Question 2 <br />WHAT KINDS AND LEVEL OF SUPPORT WILL PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPERS ANTICIPATE FROM <br />THE CITY FOR A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE STUDY AREA? <br />• Financial: The city should anticipate requests for financial participation for any multifamily proposal <br />whether affordable, mixed income or market rate due to land prices <br />and redevelopment costs. Very few submarkets in the metro area can <br />support market rate development outright because rents are not high <br />enough to cover redevelopment costs. As outlined above in the <br />“disadvantages” section, a TIF finding of “substandard” for the existing <br />commercial structures is unlikely. However, a TIF housing district may <br />be possible. Tax abatement for desirable proposals should also be <br />considered. City-owned land provided to developers for low or no cost <br />can also constitute a form of financial contribution. <br />• Policy. Beyond financial support, the city can help facilitate development through policy. Assisting with <br />land assembly by acquiring parcels as they become available, creating an efficient redevelopment process, <br />and changing land use regulations that conform with desired city uses ahead of time will entice developers. <br />• Vision and leadership. The panel anticipates that the bulk of redevelopment may still be years away, <br />owing to the stability of the existing commercial structures and businesses. Engaging with the community <br />ahead of time and creating a clear vision of what the Gateway South District will help developers see <br />where and how they can plug into that vision. It also helps with buy-in from residents by giving them the <br />opportunity to shape the district ahead of time rather than in reaction to specific proposals. <br />Question 3 <br />WHAT CAN THE CITY DO PROSPECTIVELY TO POSITION THE STUDY AREA FOR <br />REDEVELOPMENT? <br />• Create a strong vision that is shared with and supported by the community. Spend time figuring out <br />what both the City and its residents want, and then promote that vision. Developers will appreciate knowing <br />what the community wants to see, and having up front agreement about what’s anticipated can reduce <br />resistance to change from residents. <br />• Make proactive policy changes and decisions to support the vision where necessary. If zoning or <br />land use policy changes will be necessary, make them ahead of time if possible. This can help reduce the <br />complexity of possible projects as they come forward. It is similarly valuable to be upfront with the <br />development community about what types of financial support the City will consider for projects that <br />achieve their vision and goals. <br />“Every market rate <br />developer is asking for <br />subsidy unless you're <br />getting $2/square foot in <br />rent.” <br />Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers