CC MINUTES 03282023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 28, 2023 Page 3 1 2. The City Council has specified all conditions which the City Council deems necessary to 2 make the use compatible with other uses in the area; 3 3. The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or 4 working in the vicinity or to the values of property in the vicinity; and 5 4. The use will provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and 6 will contribute to the general welfare. 8 The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at a public hearing on March 21, 2023. The 9 Commission asked questions related to a variety of topics, including hours of operation, parking, 10 building accommodations, regulatory requirements and responsibilities, and other aspects of the I use. 12 13 The applicant was available remotely at the Planning Commission's meeting. She clarified that 14 she has no other locations for this type of use. 15 16 Staff received one written correspondence regarding the application. The inquiry related to many 17 of the operational and organization aspects of the request, most of which are governed by 18 Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS). The inquirer did not express either support or 19 opposition to the application. 20 21 Staff has reviewed the project for land use compliance with the intent and policies of the City's 22 Comprehensive Plan, and for zoning consistency with the "C" Commercial District as a baseline. 23 In summary, the Comprehensive Plan promotes use of the subject properties that reflect the 24 proposed commercial uses in the area. The proposed Conditional Use Permit meets the 25 requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for the baseline district zoning standards. 26 27 After the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval 28 of the Conditional Use Permit to allow the proposed Adult Daycare facility in the proposed 29 location. The Commission incorporated staffs recommended conditions as a part of their 30 motion, which relate to compliance with City public code requirements, DHS regulations, and 31 limitation of the CUP to the tenant space proposed, clarifying the CUP does not apply to the 32 entire parcel on which the building is located. 33 34 The location of the subject parcel was indicated on a drawing. Also included for Council 35 consideration was the application and supporting materials. 36 37 Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval with the following conditions: 38 39 1. Issues related to building, fire, and other related city codes shall be subject to comment and 40 recommendation by applicable staff. 41 2. The applicant receives and provides the required licensing from the State of Minnesota and 42 provides evidence of such licensing throughout occupancy in the space. 43 3. The CUP is provided for the requested tenant suite only. Changes in location, size, operation, 44 or other aspects of the facility will require a new CUP application. 45