My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05092023
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2023
>
CC PACKET 05092023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2023 12:55:50 PM
Creation date
5/4/2023 12:55:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />April 25, 2023 <br />Page 4 <br />1 the land and Mr. Grittman stated the Hannays Group. They are requesting to put fencing on their <br />2 property. <br />3 <br />4 Mayor Stille stated he looked at City Council Meeting Minutes from 1999. The City paid <br />5 $135,000 for a 24sf easement for the Hitching Post and an 84sf easement near the Dairy Queen. <br />6 The City paid money for the easements in 1999. <br />7 <br />8 Councilmember Webster asked what the benefit is to St. Anthony for vacating the easement. Mr. <br />9 Grittman stated that is the decision point for the Council. If there is no longer a need to preserve <br />10 this or have a property interest to return it to the property owners. <br />11 <br />12 Mr. Nathan Brandenberg, attorney for the applicant, appeared before the Council. He stated Mr. <br />13 Grittman’s presentation did a good job of outlining the situation. The applicant is fine with <br />14 tabling this. The utility easements are not being requested to be released. At the time the property <br />15 was purchased by Hannays there was a possible plan to develop a park on the site. At this time <br />16 there is no plan for a park. This is what has brought the request forward. The parking lot is in <br />17 need of resurface and lighting. The applicant does not want to pay for these improvements only <br />18 to find the easement will not be vacated. <br />19 <br />20 Mayor Stille closed the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. <br />21 <br />22 Councilmember Randle questioned what this would be preserved for. The property has been <br />23 empty for 8-10 years. <br />24 <br />25 Mayor Stille stated Council was advised by ULI to preserve the corridor. The easement gives the <br />26 City some leverage to help facilitate some redevelopment at some point. <br />27 <br />28 Councilmember Jenson stated the $135,000 paid for the easements, would the City request those <br />29 funds come back to the City. Mayor Stille stated the decision is do we want to have additional <br />30 leverage to develop the site in the future. <br />31 <br />32 Councilmember Webster there are so few places that are open spaces for new housing. The <br />33 southern gateway would be a possible site for that. She does not see a benefit to the City to <br />34 vacate the easement at this time. <br />35 <br />36 Councilmember Walker stated he concurs. <br />37 <br />38 Mayor Stille stated he would not want to give this leverage up especially since it was paid for. <br />39 There was a consensus of 4 Councilmembers. <br />40 <br />41 Motion by Councilmember Webster, seconded by Councilmember Walker, to table consideration <br />42 of the Land Use Application to Vacate – 2550 Hwy 88 and direct Staff to come back to Council <br />43 with a Resolution for consideration. <br />44 <br />45 Motion carried 4-1 (Randle). <br />46
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.