Laserfiche WebLink
10 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />July 11, 2023 <br />Page 3 <br />3. The applicant shall locate the equipment and enclosure to the west to maximize its distance <br />from the east property line, but no closer to Stinson Boulevard than the westerly building <br />wall. <br />4. The final location should be separated from the paved circulation spaces by concrete curb. <br />5. The applicant provides a site plan, to scale, showing parking spaces for employees and <br />customers who park while drying their vehicles or performing other details. A total of five <br />such spaces should be adequate, in addition to the vacuum station locations. <br />6. The applicant should verify that lighting of the vacuum stations will not result in a violation <br />of the City Code lighting standards - .5 footcandles at the east property line, and 1.0 <br />footcandles at the adjoining streets to the south and west. The applicant shall add side <br />shielding as described by the applicant's representative to each light bar to accomplish this <br />requirement. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked about sound. In the packet was included a sheet regarding sound <br />and asked what VFD stands for. Mr. Grittman stated the applicant's representative stated they <br />would be adhering to the lower noise standard. The noise will be below the state standards. <br />Mayor Stille stated when Council considered a different application for a car wash the applicant <br />had taken his own decibel readings and an independent reading was done. This was for a new car <br />wash with noise being considered from the car wash itself. This is for the vacuum of an existing <br />car wash. Mayor Stille questioned what if we are wrong and the noise is louder and complaints <br />are received. Mr. Grittman stated the equipment will be more than 100 feet from any residential <br />building. If the actual code requirements are not met they would need to make additional <br />modifications. <br />Councilmember Walker stated unlike the other car wash request there are significant differences <br />between the current request and that new car wash request. <br />Motion by Councilmember Webster, seconded by Councilmember Walker, to approve <br />Resolution 23-035 — Approving a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Modification to a <br />Car Wash Facility in the PUD District. <br />Motion carried 5-0. <br />VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL. <br />A. Finance Audit Report. <br />RedPath CPA Andy Hering provided a PowerPoint of the Finance Audit findings. Four reports <br />are issued the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report including the Independent Auditor's <br />Report, State Legal Compliance Report, Report on Internal Controls and Communication with <br />Those Charged with Governance. Mr. Hering reviewed the current Audit Process in detail. <br />During the State Legal Compliance Report there was one compliance finding - $521,000 of cash <br />held at the City's brokers at year-end was not covered by FDIC insurance or other collateral. The <br />funds were re -invested in 2023 so that is handled. There was a small finding regarding refunding <br />of a bond which was also corrected. The General Fund balance increased $12,071 during 2022. <br />