Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting, April 16, 2024 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />As such, staff believes that the CUP facilitates a more effective use of the site by better <br />balancing the levels of drive-through/pre-order customer traffic with those customers that dine <br />in. By doing so, the circulation pattern and likelihood of traffic issues on, or adjoining, the <br />property are lessened, and the requirements for CUP consideration and approval are advanced. <br /> <br />One last note related to the site plan layout is the unique property boundary situation. The civil <br />survey shows that the exiting traffic travels over a portion of land which is owned by the <br />adjoining apartment property to the west, but which is covered by an “ingress, egress, and <br />driveway easement”. The applicants should provide verification that there are no obstacles to <br />the proposed site configuration that may arise from this easement, including improvements to, <br />and maintenance of, the subject area. <br /> <br /> <br />Summary and Planning Commission Action. In summary, staff believes that the proposed <br />changes to the subject property are reasonable and within the expectations of the zoning <br />ordinance, under the following circumstances and conditions: <br /> <br />1. The applicants provide confirmation of the easement and rights to use, improve, and <br />maintain the subject property. <br />2. The City finds that the changes to parking supply are supported by the additional drive- <br />through configuration. <br />3. The applicants are subject to a City requirement for additional site plan modifications in <br />the event that parking requirements for the restaurant are shown to be inadequate to <br />support dine-in and employee parking on the site. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />Exhibit A: Application and Supporting Material <br />Exhibit B: Draft City Council Resolution <br /> <br />