Laserfiche WebLink
May 21, 2024 <br />Page 4 <br />2812 Anthony Lane South (Jack and Jill Preschool and Childcare): This daycare parcel is <br />located in an industrial park area. Exclusion of cannabis businesses of any distance will <br />impact some potential retail locations, primarily as a part of a “micro-“ or “mezzo-“ <br />business which does some form of industrial processing and proposes to also sell retail <br />products as an aspect of the business. The number of parcels impacted will depend on <br />the separation distance chosen. <br />2955 Pentagon Drive (Step by Step Montessori): This facility is located in the St. <br />Anthony Shopping Center, zoned Commercial. Much of the shopping center area would <br />be prohibited from retail sales, again depending on the size of the separation distance <br />adopted. <br />As noted, the statute permits (but does not require) the City to create exclusion distances from <br />schools, parks, and childcare facilities to any cannabis facility that includes retail sales. For St. <br />Anthony, the proximity of schools and parks to any potential Commercial or Industrial site is not <br />applicable, given the geography and land use pattern. The primary issue would be the location <br />of childcare facilities in the south portion of the city. There are three such facilities that would, <br />if a separation distance is adopted, create an exclusion area for surrounding property. <br />At its April meeting, the Planning Commission discussed whether the exclusion area was <br />relevant to daycare, based on an assumption that unlike schools and parks, there is less likely to <br />be unsupervised child presence using daycare facilities. The zoning action for the City would be <br />an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that eliminates the current total prohibition of <br />cannabis businesses, and replacement with language related to separation where applicable. <br />Although no impacts are foreseen for Schools and Parks as noted, staff would recommend <br />adoption of the full State-allowed exclusion area for those uses (1,000 feet for schools, and 500 <br />feet for parks). There continue to be discussions at the State level (both legislatively and <br />agency-driven) that will continue to refine aspects of the law. As such, these protections would <br />be consistent with the allowances, and address any unforeseen circumstances until additional <br />guidance is provided. Guidance is likely to come from a variety of sources, including both the <br />League of Minnesota Cities and the Office of Cannabis Management (in the form of a model <br />ordinance). <br />For childcare facilities, there is likely to be some pressure to adopt a limited separation zone <br />from retail cannabis outlets. As noted, the full 500 feet would significantly limit retail outlets in <br />the south area of the City. A distance of 250 feet would have a lesser impact, but still affect <br />some potential sales locations. In the alternative, the City could create a limitation that <br />prohibits retail sales on premises that abut a parcel with childcare, rather than default to the <br />distance allowance. This would be effectively the same as a “1-foot” buffer. The attached draft <br />ordinance incorporates alternative language for Planning Commission review and discussion. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />If acceptable to the Commission, staff asks that the Commission further discuss the separation <br />distance aspects of the potential regulations, and raise other issues as they may impact a final <br />ordinance adoption. With these comments, and if the proposed Ordinance amendments