My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06112024
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2024
>
CC PACKET 06112024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2024 9:20:58 AM
Creation date
6/7/2024 9:20:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 11, 2024 <br />Page 5 <br />At its April meeting, the Planning Commission discussed whether the exclusion area was <br />relevant to daycare, based on an assumption that unlike schools and parks, there is less likely to <br />be unsupervised child presence using daycare facilities. The zoning action for the City would be <br />an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that eliminates the current total prohibition of <br />cannabis businesses, and replacement with language related to separation where applicable. <br />Although no impacts are foreseen for Schools and Parks as noted, staff would recommend <br />adoption of the full State-allowed exclusion area for those uses (1,000 feet for schools, and 500 <br />feet for parks). There continue to be discussions at the State level (both legislatively and <br />agency-driven) that will continue to refine aspects of the law. As such, these protections would <br />be consistent with the allowances, and address any unforeseen circumstances until additional <br />guidance is provided. Guidance is likely to come from a variety of sources, including both the <br />League of Minnesota Cities and the Office of Cannabis Management (in the form of a model <br />ordinance). <br />For childcare facilities, there is likely to be some pressure to adopt a limited separation zone <br />from retail cannabis outlets. As noted, the full 500 feet would significantly limit retail outlets in <br />the south area of the City. A distance of 250 feet would have a lesser impact, but still affect <br />some potential sales locations. In the alternative, the City could create a limitation that <br />prohibits retail sales on premises that abut a parcel with childcare, rather than default to the <br />distance allowance. This would be effectively the same as a “1-foot” buffer. The attached draft <br />ordinance incorporates alternative language for Planning Commission review and discussion. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />If acceptable to the Commission, staff asks that the Commission further discuss the separation <br />distance aspects of the potential regulations, and raise other issues as they may impact a final <br />ordinance adoption. With these comments, and if the proposed Ordinance amendments <br />reflect those discussions, forwarding the zoning amendment to the City Council would be in <br />order. <br />SUMMARY AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS <br />If the Planning Commission is in agreement, staff recommends approval of a draft zoning <br />regulation that creates the separation distances for schools (1,000 feet), parks (500 feet – <br />specifically for Central Park, Emerald Park, Silver Point Park, Trillium Park, and Water Tower <br />Park), and either a specific distance or an “abutting property” separation for childcare facilities, <br />and noted in this report. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />Exhibit A:State Law – Local Control <br />Exhibit B:Map of Separation Distance Impacts <br />Exhibit C:Draft Ordinance 2024-03 Amendment <br />29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.