My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 02252025
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2025
>
CC MINUTES 02252025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 10:23:34 AM
Creation date
3/26/2025 10:23:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />February 25, 2025 <br />Page 3 <br />1 This Public Safety Facility option is dependent on two primary factors: (1) the feasibility of <br />2 constructing an expanded facility adjacent to the existing fire station, and (2) the ability of the <br />3 City to secure as much outside funding as possible, and supplement with city bonding at an <br />4 amount that will not put additional, undue pressure on the annual tax levy. As reflected in the <br />5 City's 2025 Strategic Plan, efforts will be made this year to determine if a Public Safety Facility <br />6 approach is feasible both logistically and financially. <br />7 <br />8 To determine the answer on both of those factors, third -party expertise is needed. Staff has been <br />9 working on preliminary steps to secure the expertise, and proposals are included for Council's <br />10 review and approval of the approach proposed. <br />11 <br />12 The City worked with Oertel Architects in 2024 to discuss the Police Department facility while <br />13 the Falcon Heights partnership renewal discussions were taking place to assess the impact and <br />14 options at the Community Center facility. Subsequent discussions have focused on the concept of <br />15 the Public Safety Facility and the plan to seek outside funding. <br />16 <br />17 In order to determine if outside funding will be available, the City needs to get the facility <br />18 concept to a "predesign" status which is enough design to demonstrate the project has legitimate <br />19 support and is achievable, while leaving many details and specifics to be determined at a <br />20 subsequent phase, once adequacy of funding is determined. <br />21 <br />22 Those deliverables are described in the proposal from Oertel Architects and consist of four <br />23 primary elements: <br />24 • Spreadsheet showing space needs and relation to existing spaces. <br />25 • Test fits showing remodel and addition options. <br />26 • Early phase opinion of cost. <br />27 • Presentation graphics as needed. <br />28 <br />29 The proposed cost for this predesign phase is $15,150. <br />30 <br />31 The City does not have the financial resources to fund a new facility exclusively through its <br />32 annual tax levy, and outside support will be required. The City has a long history of seeking <br />33 grant funding, but does not have an extensive history in seeking and securing this particular type <br />34 and scope of funding, and third -party expertise will be needed in order to fully explore the <br />35 options and craft a compelling case for financial support. <br />36 <br />37 Staff has met with Fox Advancement on two occasions to discuss this project and craft a scope <br />38 of work to assist. Fox Advancement has provided a proposal to assist that covers four primary <br />39 objectives with additional details in their proposal: <br />40 • Identify and Prioritize Public Grant Opportunities. <br />41 • Develop a Strategic Grant Application Plan. <br />42 • Explore Public -Private Partnerships and Philanthropic Funding. <br />43 • Final Report and Recommendations. <br />44 <br />45 The proposed cost for this work is proposed at hourly rates detailed in the proposal, with an <br />46 overall scope expected to be approximately $8,000 - $9,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.