My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PK PACKET 05212025- Worksession
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Parks and Environmental Commission Packets
>
2025
>
PK PACKET 05212025- Worksession
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2025 11:08:08 AM
Creation date
5/16/2025 11:05:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks and Environmental Commission Work Session Meeting Minutes <br />April 2, 2025 <br />Page 5 <br />1 not know the impact as St. Anthony is a fully built-out City. If policy is set, we will be <br />2 prepared for any development in the future. <br />3 <br />4 Commissioner Hark asked if this has been discussed before, and is there a benchmark. Ms. <br />5 Morello stated there has not been a policy discussion. <br />6 <br />7 Chair Fee stated it seems evenly split between industrial, commercial, and residential. <br />8 <br />9 Commissioner Hark suggested multi-family may be a target since that has been the <br />10 development the City has been seeing recently. He would prioritize multi-family zoning over <br />11 the others, then commercial and industrial. The residential homeowners would have access to <br />12 the audits. <br />13 <br />14 Commissioner Peterson agreed with Commissioner Hark’s comment on multi-family and <br />15 thinks that would be key. <br />16 <br />17 Chair Fee asked if there is a way to create policies that relate to the different zones. Ms. <br />18 Saulog stated that is an option that can be considered. <br />19 <br />20 Commissioner Hark asked if the policies would be regardless of the funding source, and <br />21 would this apply to privately funded projects. Ms. Morello stated if a mandatory approach was <br />22 selected it would not relate to funding. <br />23 <br />24 Commissioner Synhavsky stated she does not want to leave single-family out of this. She <br />25 wants to make sure sustainability is taken into account for renovations. If it’s a full knock- <br />26 down rebuild would the policy apply versus a renovation of a portion of the home. Ms. <br />27 Morello stated a policy on new construction could be considered. She suggested size of the <br />28 building be discussed. <br />29 <br />30 Chair Fee asked if other cities include single-family homes. Ms. Morello stated Staff will do <br />31 more research on single-family residential and multi-family. Staff will come back with a <br />32 suggested approach and research on other cities’ mandatory approaches. Multi-family is the <br />33 highest priority from a mandatory approach. <br />34 <br />35 Commissioner Peterson referred to the policy triggers – PUD Development and the incentives <br />36 (page 18 of the PDF provided). <br />37 <br />38 Chair Fee highlighted five as a higher priority as she felt they are more impactful. The <br />39 recommended criteria seemed like retroactive or passive criteria. She reviewed the five she <br />40 had selected. <br />41 <br />42 Commissioner Hark agreed. If a project followed the guidelines, it would be close to <br />43 becoming a LEED-certified building. He especially likes the EV Charging capability. Ms. <br />44 Morello stated at the next PEC Work session EV Charging will be discussed. Commissioner <br />45 Hark stated water and energy monitoring in multi-family housing is also important. <br />46
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.