Laserfiche WebLink
Parks and Environmental Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />May 21, 2025 <br />Page 4 <br />1 With regards to the highlighted sections (A)(12)(f) of the draft ordinance, what <br />2 feedback does PEC have for the option to defer equipment installation apart from the <br />3 initial development of EV-ready infrastructure? <br />4 <br />5 Chair Fee asked what the rationale was for the City Council’s decision to go with Option 3. <br />6 Mr. Grittman stated that the Council liked the idea of diving in and that the neighboring <br />7 communities had code. Chair Fee further discussed incentives. She asked if, from a State <br />8 Level, there are things businesses could take advantage of. Ms. Morello stated that one of the <br />9 things reflected in the conversations with the City Council was related to the size of the <br />10 developments in question. It is not intended to affect smaller businesses. <br />11 <br />12 Commissioner Swiontek asked in St. Anthony in the last few years how many large new <br />13 developments have there been. Mr. Grittman stated that the Ruby, Haven Grove Senior <br />14 Housing, and a small apartment building on 37th Avenue were the “larger” residential multi- <br />15 family projects within St. Anthony. Commissioner Swiontek asked if any of the other cities <br />16 have both an incentive as well as a regulatory aspect. Mr. Grittman stated that they focus on <br />17 the regulatory number. She asked if the goal was to encourage electric vehicle charging within <br />18 St. Anthony. She also asked what would draw people to put in EV chargers now. <br />19 <br />20 Commissioner Hark stated he would lean towards incentives and asked if low-income housing <br />21 would be exempt from this. Mr. Grittman stated not the way the Ordinance is written. There <br />22 are limited exemptions, but not based on land use. Other strategies can be implemented. The <br />23 market will build on some of this. Most of the EV charging facilities he is familiar with were <br />24 done by private businesses. <br />25 <br />26 Chair Fee asked how this would work, and does the user pay for charging, and if that would <br />27 alleviate the cost for the business. Mr. Grittman responded that the business may wish to <br />28 provide this for their tenants. <br />29 <br />30 Commissioner Peterson stated that Level 2 costs approximately $2,000 to install, and a Level <br />31 1 is a few hundred dollars. Mr. Grittman stated he has seen Level 2 between $2,000 - $5,000. <br />32 <br />33 Commissioner Synhavsky asked about the 2-year waiting period, and with the size of the <br />34 projects, the cost for installing EV chargers is very low. She would not be in favor of the <br />35 waiting period. <br />36 <br />37 Commissioner Peterson stated she agrees. She referred to a strip mall, and does the number of <br />38 parking spaces apply to the entire strip mall? Mr. Grittman stated this applies to a building <br />39 over 8,000 sf. <br />40 <br />41 Commissioner Swiontek referred to the Dairy Queen and asked if the burden would be on the <br />42 strip mall owner rather than the tenant. Mr. Grittman stated he assumes the cost would be <br />43 passed on to the tenants. <br />44 <br />45 Commissioner Hark stated they could do a cost share for the chargers. Commissioner Hark <br />46 stated the cost of the charging stations is $15,000 - $20,000. He is in favor of a hybrid of <br />47