Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />June 17, 2025 <br />Page 6 <br />1 Motion by Commissioner Erickson, seconded by Chair Socha, to recommend a work session be held <br />2 between the City Council, Planning Commission, and Parks and Environmental Commission to <br />3 discuss this further and obtain information from Roseville and New Brighton on how their ordinance <br />4 is working, and information on the State level. <br />6 Motion failed 2-2 (Corneille, Mayne). <br />7 <br />8 Motion by Chair Socha, seconded by Commissioner Corneille, to recommend a work session be held <br />9 between the City Council, Planning Commission, and Parks and Environmental Commission to <br />10 discuss this further and obtain information from Roseville and New Brighton on how their ordinance <br />11 is working, and information on the State level. <br />12 <br />13 Motion carried 4-0. <br />14 <br />15 Chair Socha closed the public hearing at 8:22 p.m. <br />16 <br />17 B. Ordinance 2025-Ox: DRAFT —Rental. <br />18 <br />19 Chair Socha opened the public hearing at 8:24 p.m. <br />20 <br />21 Mr. Grittman reviewed that the City has been working toward policy and regulatory efforts related to <br />22 a series of housing goals over the past few years. These goals include seeking methods to support <br />23 affordable housing development and preservation of existing single-family housing, including the <br />24 concept of "Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing" — NOAH, which relies on the availability of <br />25 older housing stock, often at more affordable prices, allowing younger and/or more modest income <br />26 families to attain single-family housing ownership in the community. <br />27 <br />28 Two ordinance drafts are to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. One builds standards for rental <br />29 single-family housing as land use. The second establishes additional licensing and process <br />30 requirements for license applicants and the ongoing operation of rental housing. The Planning <br />31 Commission's review will primarily focus on the first ordinance, with the second informal ordinance <br />32 language provided for additional context. <br />33 <br />34 Mr. Grittman continued and noted that the first ordinance illustrates proposed redlined changes to <br />35 Chapters 152, 154, and 157. To help maintain single-family preservation, the City Council has <br />36 directed research into options for limiting the loss of ownership of housing. Three strategies have <br />37 been identified as apart of this objective. These are the following: <br />38 <br />39 <br />1. Limit Corporate Ownership of Rental Units. This strategy is designed to ensure that <br />40 <br />large-scale corporate purchases of existing single-family housing stock cannot happen <br />41 <br />in the Village. While this phenomenon has not been an issue to date, corporate <br />42 <br />ownership (and the conversion of owner -occupied single-family homes to rental units) <br />43 <br />has been seen in communities around the Twin Cities area. The ordinance amendment <br />44 <br />is designed to restrict "Corporate" ownership to no more than 4 rental units per person <br />45 <br />or organization. The language is adapted from draft legislation that the State <br />46 <br />Legislature has considered over the past few years (although not enacted). <br />