PL PACKET 06172025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 15, 2025 Page 4 5.1 The applicant modifies the south building exposure to add architectural features and interest to 2 both the wall and roofline, subject to staff review and approval. The plans as resubmitted meet 3 this condition as recommended by staff. 6.4 The applicant works with the City to sign the emergency vehicle lane along Foss Road for no 5 parking. 7.6 The City Engineer reviews and approves the grading and drainage plans. Substantive 7 modifications to the site plan resulting from grading plan changes may result in additional 8 official review of the proposed plan. 8.9 The City Engineer approves required final designs of the bioretention and other aspects of the 10 stormwater (and other) plans as noted in the Engineer’s memo of April 3, 2025. 9.11 The weed-barrier material under the deck is pervious fabric to ensure compliance with 12 impervious surface regulations. 10.13 Additional landscaping plant materials are provided in the rock mulch edge along the south 14 side of the building to help mitigate impacts of the lessened setback in this area. The updated 15 plans reflect compliance with this condition. 11.16 The applicant supplement landscape plans with the recommendations of the City Engineer and 17 as suggested in this report. 12.18 Additional sustainability elements recommended by the Planning Commission and approved 19 by the City Council may be included in any final approval. 13.20 The proposed sign will be reviewed separately and permitted under standard sign permitting 21 procedures. 14.22 The applicant constructs the project consistent with the final approved plans. 15.23 The applicant enters into a Conditional Use Permit Development Agreement guaranteeing the 24 terms of the permit and operational elements. 16.25 The approval recommendation incorporates the findings of fact noted in this report, and as 26 included in the draft City Council Resolution. 17.27 Any additional recommendations of the Planning Commission following the Public Hearing. 28 29 Staff proposed alternative Planning Commission Actions as: 1.30 Motion to recommend denial of the CUP and/or Variances. In the event of a recommendation 31 for denial, the Planning Commission must state its findings related to denial on the record. 2.32 Request Additional information and Table Action. A motion to table should be accompanied 33 by the specific information requested of staff or the developer necessary to make a 34 recommendation. Staff note: Given 60-day timelines, the Planning Commission should 35 attempt to forward a recommendation at this time to provide the City Council adequate time to 36 consider the application. 37 38 Also provide for Planning Commission consideration was the PowerPoint presented by Mr. Grittman, 39 the Application and Supporting Material and the Draft City Council Resolution. 40 41 Commissioner Mayne asked if the stormwater changes are indicated in the drawing, and Mr. 42 Grittman stated the City Engineer will work with the applicant on the stormwater changes, and it will 43 be made a condition for approval that the applicant agrees with the City Engineer recommendations. 44 Commissioner Mayne asked about the landscaping. Mr. Grittman stated the tree planting will be on 45 the north side with other planting on the south side. 46