Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />April 15, 2025 <br />Page 4 <br />1 concept of rental properties negatively impacting the character of the neighborhood is troubling. He is <br />2 sad Council would use that language. <br />3 <br />4 Chair Socha stated she was involved in these discussions originally. There were a number of Planning <br />5 Commission – City Council Joint Sessions and later the Planning Commission was dropped from <br />6 those Joint Sessions. She believes it would be helpful to have a Joint Session with the City Council so <br />7 they can hear directly what the Planning Commission thinks about this. Previously, the City Council <br />8 was not “super fans” of what the Planning Commission recommended. The Planning Commission <br />9 asked how long-term rentals affect affordable housing goals. Market Conditions determine what the <br />10 housing market is. The fear of corporate landlords coming in and buying properties has not <br />11 materialized. The Planning Commission has further unanswered questions, such as how the goals of <br />12 affordable housing would be furthered by having rental limits. The idea of the character of a <br />13 neighborhood being preserved is not clear at all. The Planning Commission had asked if there should <br />14 be a cap or is this a restriction of property rights. There are some exceptions that should be <br />15 considered. Chair Socha asked how a cap on rental properties would impede the passing on of <br />16 generational wealth. She is disappointed the Planning Commission got dropped from the <br />17 conversation. She asked if there should be a cap at all. It is a huge restriction on property rights. She <br />18 is not a landlord. The question is what the justification is for capping it at all. She would like to <br />19 discuss this with the City Council again in a joint session. She wants to understand the justifications <br />20 better. If there is no justification, the property rights should be left alone. <br />21 <br />22 Commissioner Erickson questioned if a cap is necessary. If there will be exceptions, would there be <br />23 an application process, and what is the criteria. He generally agrees it is odd to restrict property rights <br />24 to this extreme degree. He has not heard of this before. He stated his opinion that a community needs <br />25 some balance it its development. He believes St. Anthony is over a 50% rental community, and <br />26 limiting the single-family housing rental stock to a cap would help to balance some of that. He sees <br />27 some benefit to having some community balance in terms of the housing mix. Stability can have <br />28 benefits to a community. <br />29 <br />30 Commissioner Corneille stated it is unclear what problem is being solved by this. The problem is not <br />31 articulated. Is the problem that there are too many renters, the housing prices are too high, the renters <br />32 are not in the character of the community, people don’t want to live in an apartment, etc. The result is <br />33 higher prices for renters who are here. We are further reducing affordability. This is the exact <br />34 opposite of what the Council has stated their goals are on affordability. <br />35 <br />36 Commissioner Anderson agreed it feels like a solution to a problem that is not identified. If we are <br />37 already setting a cap with exceptions, we are admitting it is not a workable solution if the cap is so <br />38 low there can only be one more rental. This would be unfair to residents. <br />39 <br />40 Commissioner Corneille stated the Federal Reserve put out a research paper in March of 2024. One of <br />41 the outcomes of rental caps decrease access to affordable housing. This does not seem to be a data- <br />42 driven recommendation. Most of the rentals are owned by residents who only have one rental license <br />43 and this is not vast corporate ownership. There could be many reasons. There needs to be a trigger <br />44 point and when that trigger is reached, readdress the situation. The Federal Reserve stated there is a <br />45 reduction in property values when rental caps are in place. In an environment where people can’t <br />46 afford the down payment or have monies to make repairs on a home. This causes a degradation in