Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />April 15, 2025 <br />Page 6 <br />1 Ms. Morello stated she is hearing general disagreement with the current proposal and asked if that <br />2 was disagreement with any cap. She asked what would be an acceptable cap. <br />3 <br />4 Chair Socha stated she is against any cap unless there is a compelling reason which she has not heard. <br />5 If there was a moderate cap of 15% there needs to be exceptions. She would suggest a cap to how <br />6 many licenses an owner can have to rent their properties. She thinks it should be 1/3 to prevent a <br />7 surprise takeover. <br />8 <br />9 Commissioner Corneille stated if there is a problem of people not picking up after their dogs, and we <br />10 say we want to cap the number of dogs on each block. Trying to control one thing has nothing to do <br />11 with the other. To put a cap in it would be admitting it would be beneficial. He is against any type of <br />12 cap. If there are issues with code enforcements on his street and none of them are rentals. There is a <br />13 good process for rental licensing in the City. The same standard is not being applied to the resident <br />14 home-owners. There are more restrictions on rental properties than owner-occupied properties. What <br />15 problem is being solved and what data is there to show a problem would be solved. Why are we <br />16 doing it. The real question is what is the purpose of this. <br />17 <br />18 Commissioner Erickson stated this does not seem like there is a problem or issue, as the percentage is <br />19 low of single-family homes being rented. Without knowing what the issue is, we are trying to solve <br />20 no cap is needed. The pending bill before the Senate for the zoning issue allowing two or more <br />21 families on a single parcel. <br />22 <br />23 Chair Socha stated she does not want a cap at all unless she is presented with evidence that it is <br />24 needed. <br />25 <br />26 Ms. Morello referred to dividing the City into zones and not wanting any concentration in any <br />27 particular area of the City of rental homes. If caps were pursued what is the Commission’s thoughts <br />28 on caps on zones. <br />29 <br />30 Commissioner Corneille asked if the City Council had a reason for no concentration in a particular <br />31 area. Mr. Grittman stated Council’s concern was an overconcentration of renters would have an <br />32 immediate negative impact on property values in that area. <br />33 <br />34 Mr. Grittman stated staff was requested to examine property values around rentals, and the <br />35 impression that was gleaned was there was more of an impact on property values. <br />36 <br />37 Commissioner Anderson stated in 2010 she had a house, and if she had tried to sell at that time, it <br />38 would have been a fire sale. It was less than half the value of when she purchased it. <br />39 <br />40 Chair Socha stated Ex-Commissioner Rude, who was a rental property owner, was very adamant in <br />41 the discussions that there are other ways to enforce rental properties to meet the goals instead of <br />42 prohibiting. The goals did not make any sense to him as a property owner. She is generally not <br />43 opposed to regulations. These regulations make no sense to her. She is not willing to support any <br />44 regulation that doesn’t make sense. If this happens, St. Anthony is less desirable for her to live in or <br />45 buy in because this restriction is here. She would not want this restriction on her. <br />46