My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WS PACKET 10282025
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2025
>
CC WS PACKET 10282025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2025 11:01:10 AM
Creation date
10/28/2025 10:52:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 14, 2025 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 5 <br />Councilmember Elnagdy stated the cost savings are high with the bulb-only replacement and asked if <br />the ballast replacement is needed now. She asked how this would impact the overall levy. How many <br />moves can be made before a final number is set? Mr. Yunker stated that timing does not affect the <br />amount of levy, but it affects cash flow. Mr. Yunker stated that if one sheet of ice is offered, the <br />equipment is still needed. Councilmember Elnagdy asked what items could be removed to bring the levy <br />down. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked if the bulb or ballast replacement is included in the budget, and Mr. <br />Yunker stated that the bulb replacement is included. Ms. Maloney noted it will take six years to recover <br />some of the costs for the lighting of the tennis courts, and approximately five years for the lighting at <br />Central Park field. Councilmember Doolan asked if that is for the bulb or ballast replacement, and Ms. <br />Yunker stated it is for the bulb replacement. <br />Councilmember Randle asked if the school district would pitch in for Central Park lighting, and Mr. <br />Yunker stated they could, but they are not at that point yet. <br />Mayor Webster asked about the replacement of vehicles and what the expectations are for City vehicles <br />and City Staff. Her understanding is that some staff are provided with City vehicles because if there is an <br />emergency call in the middle of the night, we expect them to come back to work and go directly to the <br />scene. Mr. Yunker stated that it is correct. <br />Councilmember Doolan asked about the police and city hall, and assumes that this is phase 1 to increase <br />for City Staff. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked when the decision needs to be made regarding the bulb or ballast <br />replacement, and Mr. Yunker stated the decision needs to be made regarding the one-time funds. Mr. <br />Yunker stated that when it was decided to close the TIF districts, the Council had discussed using it for <br />upgrades and park upgrades at that time. <br />A spreadsheet of the 2026 Levy Increase was also displayed. <br />Mr. Yunker reviewed the Use of One-Time Funds. Council has discussed the use of reducing the levy <br />increase or funding amenities. <br />Options for Use of $990,000 (estimated) Levy <br />Increase <br />Base levy increase without funding new Firefighter positions 5.4% <br />Absorb the cost of 3 additional Firefighter/Paramedics (1 for each shift)9.18% <br />Use returned TIF District funds to reduce the annual levy increase over a period of time. <br />Use 2/3 of available funds over 6 years to reduce the levy by $100,000 for each of <br />6 years.8.14% <br />Use all available funds over 6 years to reduce the levy by $150,000 for each of 6 years 7.63% <br />Money transferred to Capital Funds to offset levy dollars. <br />Use all available funds over 3 years to reduce the levy by $300,000 for each of 3 years.6.08% <br />Mr. Yunker reviewed the various options along with aspects for the City Council to consider. <br />7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.