CC WS PACKET 02242026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Councilmember Jenson stated that at the town hall meeting, there was discussion about ICE reform behavior and how that would need to happen at the Congress level in order to be effective. Councilmember Elnagdy commented that she disagrees and was frustrated, as it appears they are approaching the situation from a status quo and forgetting that they are not operating in the status quo. She stated that the Federal government is not playing by the rules and was unsure why the City is afraid to step over the line. She believed that aggressive behavior calls for an aggressive response. She commented that separation ordinances have been enacted in Minnesota, New York, and a few other states and explained that those ordinances codify what the City already has authority over. She commented that they have no idea the impact that could have and was horrified that they are contemplating doing nothing. She stated that they cannot agree with what is happening now and place that burden on residents. She believed that at the least, they could make their position known, and if there is concern with Federal backlash, she was unsure how the situation could get worse. She commented that Mankato is a good example and provided information on the ordinance adopted by that city. She commented that the City could file an amicus brief, joining the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Councilmember Randle commented that he disagrees and stated that trying to restrict ICE from coming into the community will bring legal liability on the City. He stated that he would never ask the officers of this community to stand in front of ICE. He commented that ordinances and policies will not stop ICE because of the rights they have by law. He stated that they can educate people and share information, but believes that it is wrong to get in between federal law. He stated that staff cannot enforce this and recognized that tempers are high, but they need to take a step back and see what is going on. He stated that he does not believe half of what he sees or hears, as this has been worked into a hysteria where people do not know what is right or wrong. He prefers to stay on the side of protecting the City. He commented that St. Anthony Village is not Minneapolis, and they cannot do everything that community does. He stated that these actions have not worked in other cities, and this is a small city. He stated that he received an email from a resident, but has not seen or heard of much ICE activity in the community. He stated that he is not willing to put the City’s officers in front of that. Mayor Webster stated that she is of the mindset of what the City can do. She was concerned with the most vulnerable residents, where the City has authority, and what can be enforced. She stated that they asked a lot of questions and received feedback on where the City has authority. She asked that the focus be on what could be done to protect those most vulnerable residents. Councilmember Doolan stated that while she does not support this particular language, she still believes that there are things that can be done. She commented that she has spoken with representatives from many other communities and there are opportunities for collaboration with other communities and counties. She noted that she recently signed on in support of the County position. She commented that while she understands why Minneapolis and St. Paul are adopting ordinances, she wondered how effective they are, as they have not stopped ICE from going into their communities. Councilmember Elnagdy recognized that they could not stop ICE from coming into the community, but stated that the ordinances define what is and is not acceptable behavior. She used the example of prohibiting ICE from staging on City property and asked how they would be afraid to ask the police to approach the ICE vehicle, and instead ask residents acting as constitutional observers to do it. She commented that feels insane and suggested that the City consider ordinances that regulate City property and City employees.