CC WS PACKET 02242026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Yunker stated that in listening to the discussion tonight, rather than going down a path of ordinances and policies, he asked if the Council would be interested in a drafted resolution that states the stance and communicates without obligating the City to something that could not be fulfilled. Councilmember Elnagdy agreed that she does not care about the format but wants to see the statement being made. Councilmember Randle agreed that would be a nice compromise. Councilmember Jenson stated that he also came here with that mindset and supports that. Councilmember Doolan stated that she can send staff some examples that she has seen. Councilmember Elnagdy stated that she could also draft some language for consideration. Councilmember Doolan referenced the concept of an eviction moratorium, recognizing that is not something the City could do, but they could voice their support for a request to the Governor. She was unsure if that should be done on the Council level, but noted that she would be doing that on her own personal level. She referenced the potential execution of a towing moratorium, or fees collected, and had concerns with public information requests and how assistance would actually be provided. She stated that there are private organizations in place that can provide resources and assistance, and perhaps they just help people find those resources. Councilmember Randle stated that he previously managed properties, which included a budget. He noted the impacts that rent freezes have on the ability to maintain and upgrade units. He stated that there are always consequences to actions, and it is usually the residents people are trying to help that pay the price. Councilmember Elnagdy recognized that the City is not in charge of private contracts and cannot prevent evictions. She stated that one of the most heartwarming things is how quickly and effectively the community has come together to build networks that get everyone’s needs met. She did not think it should be up to residents to front the cost. She did not want the answer to be that things should be left to the community, as the City is a part of it and should take responsibility to the extent possible. She recognized that covering tow fees is not in the budget, but assisting her neighbor with their rent is also not in her budget. Councilmember Doolan stated that she understands that position, but has concerns with the public record requirements of a city. She stated that another city donated money to a private entity that can administer that without legal public disclosure. She stated that they need to understand the opportunity on the streets and how many residents are living in spaces where street parking is the only option. She believed that understanding needs and risks would be the first step. Councilmember Randle asked if the intention would be for the City to pay that cost. Councilmember Elnagdy replied that the towing is done by private companies, so they cannot force them not to ask for money, and if the City does not want residents to pay that fee, the City would be paying that. Councilmember Doolan asked if the intention would be for this assistance to be targeted only at those who feel at risk going outside to move their vehicles, rather than a blanket that would be provided to all. Councilmember Elnagdy confirmed that she would propose the targeted route and used the example of people who have been detained and whose vehicles were parked on the street.