Laserfiche WebLink
May 26th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 2 <br /> <br /> <br />should retain control over the ownership relationship between the tenant and the property owner. <br />He noted that if the new owner of the home would like to continue renting to the current tenant, <br />they are welcome to reapply for a rental license. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elnagdy raised concerns about the renters’ rights. She noted that this language <br />leaves the renter without any property rights if the homeowner decides to sell. Councilmember <br />Elnagdy proposed adding an option, such as a non-disturbance agreement, to protect renters <br />better and prevent them from being forced out of their homes without recourse. Councilmember <br />Jenson noted that it is unlikely that a property owner would sell the home to another owner who has <br />no say over the tenant living there. Councilmember Jenson noted that if there is a requirement that <br />the property owner express intent to sell the home to the renter and inform them of the risks of <br />renting the property if they choose to sell, there is no significant issue for the tenant. <br />Councilmember Elnagdy agreed but asked whether there could be a simpler option for new <br />homeowners than a full reapplication, if they are amenable to the current tenant staying in the <br />ADU. <br /> <br />Mayor Webster stated that she did not believe the City needed to fully mediate the tenant/landlord <br />relationship and the transition between owners. Councilmember Elnagdy reminded the Council <br />that the rental license follows the property owner, and the new owner would have to apply for a <br />license if they wanted the tenant to stay, which could force the tenant to move out temporarily and <br />then move back in. She expressed that this is complex and that there should be a simpler option for <br />continuation if the new owner chooses. <br /> <br />City Planner Grittman noted that this clause was written to prevent an unwanted tenant from living <br />on the new owner's property. He suggested adding a line stating that the tenant may continue living <br />in the ADU, provided the new owner wishes to do so, and the tenant is eligible for a rental license. <br /> <br />Mayor Webster asked whether the individual purchasing the home could begin the rental license <br />application before closing. <br /> <br />Assistant City Manager Morello highlighted the complexities of facilitating a rental license <br />handover, given the timelines for moving and questions about when an individual acquires property <br />rights during the closing process. She noted that rental licenses must be updated annually and that <br />terminating the previous owner’s license was a logical step. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jenson questioned whether Assistant City Manager Morello was suggesting that <br />the renter would have to move. She stated that this is a risk renters take on. Councilmember <br />Jenson agreed that this is a reasonable risk but emphasized the need for clear communication of <br />this risk when the lease is signed, and the homeowner is considering moving. <br /> <br />Councilmember Doolan asked whether the sale of a traditional rental home could also result in <br />termination of the rental agreement. Assistant City Manager Morello stated that she believed it <br />could, and that the City requires rental licenses to be updated every year so that an inspection can <br />be performed to ensure the rental dwelling is livable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jenson stated that if a rental company purchases the home and attempts to rent <br />out both the ADU and the main dwelling, this could be done only if the area where the homes are <br />located has fewer rental units than allowed. Councilmember Doolan noted that the ADU does not <br />count as a second count toward the limit; the ADU and the main dwelling are considered one unit.