Laserfiche WebLink
August 10th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 2 <br />Excess Fund Balance, and St. Anthony is on the high side of that range. Councilmember Doolan <br />noted that it would not be a concern to reduce this Fund’s total, since the City is on the high side <br />and this is a good use of the funds. <br />Councilmember Jenson pointed out that the Fund balance came out at 56 percent, and that the <br />target is 50 percent. He stated there is no logic in having too much money in this fund. <br />Finance Director Maloney explained that the leftover Fund balance is used to fund the City until <br />June of each fiscal year. <br />Mayor Webster clarified that the 50 percent Fund balance is to fund the City for six months. <br />Finance Director Maloney confirmed that this is the goal until they receive their tax settlement. <br />Mayor Webster reminded the Council that they adopted a policy in previous years to use Excess <br />Funds to address City needs when Excess Funds exceed 50 percent. Councilmember Jenson <br />informed the Council that in the past, the Fund balance was closer to 35 or 40 percent. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked what allows the Fund balance to be higher than planned. Finance <br />Director Maloney stated that it can be many things, such as unaccounted-for revenues, higher- <br />than-expected revenues, lower-than-budgeted expenses, and more. <br />Councilmember Doolan asked if the expenses proposed to be covered by the Excess Fund <br />balance will bring it down to 50 percent. Finance Director Maloney confirmed that is the case. <br />Councilmember Doolan stated that there is little risk in bringing the Excess Fund balance down <br />to 50 percent if that is on the high end of what is recommended anyway. <br />Mayor Webster confirmed that the Council agrees to utilize the Excess Fund Balance for Police <br />recruitment incentives and Comprehensive Plan expenses. She asked whether the Council <br />would like sustainability initiatives to be a one-year allocation or likely to extend beyond one <br />year. <br />Councilmember Doolan reflected on the previous meeting and reminded the Council that the <br />City hoped to use the funds to enable the Green Corps member to pursue more sustainability <br />education. She noted that this scope seems more limited and could be classified as a single- <br />year project. <br />Mayor Webster cautioned that there is a risk in tying the funds to an intern or Green Corps <br />member if the City is unable to hire one. <br />Councilmember Jenson stated that he perceived the proposed 30,000 dollars as a one-year <br />beginner program, and that the Council would reassess the investment the next year. He <br />commented that he does not feel that the City is in a dire climate crisis, and so the City should <br />mostly focus on education surrounding building. Councilmember Jenson expressed support for <br />treating the sustainability initiatives as a one-year pilot program. <br />Mayor Webster asked whether data from one year would be sufficient to determine whether the <br />City should reinvest in this program. Councilmember Jenson stated that Sustainability <br />Coordinator Saulog will be able to provide the data. <br />Mayor Webster highlighted the value of research and data on the impact of programs. She <br />proposed making the sustainability initiatives a two- or three-year investment to gather more <br />information on their success. Councilmember Jenson encouraged remaining true to the set <br />dollar amount and single-year plan. <br />4