Laserfiche WebLink
August 10th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 4 <br />City Manager Yunker reminded the Council that these funds relate to outside-of-City-operations <br />sustainability projects, and that changes outside of City operations are much harder to measure <br />due to increased variables, resulting in less data-driven measurement. He refocused the <br />conversation on education. <br />Councilmember Doolan suggested changing the label from “sustainability incentives” to <br />“sustainability initiatives.” She encouraged clarifying incentives at the bare minimum, noting that <br />incentives refer to educating citizens on what incentives are already available, not funding <br />incentives. <br />Mayor Webster expressed appreciation for the good news of finding excess TIF collections, <br />which added 100,000 dollars in revenue. She thanked Finance Director Maloney for including <br />this in her presentation. <br />Finance Director Maloney confirmed to the Council that sustainability initiatives will be added to <br />the General Fund Budget, bringing the levy increase to 6.54 percent. She informed the Council <br />that the LGA will remain as is and will not generate additional revenue. She noted, however, that <br />there are other intergovernmental revenues for which she does not have estimates at this <br />moment. Finance Director Maloney highlighted that Staff will continue to monitor revenues and <br />expenses to help reduce the tax levy increase. She asked whether the Council would be <br />comfortable with the quoted 6.54 percent increase if Staff are unable to find ways to lower the <br />levy. <br />Councilmember Jenson stated that he was comfortable with the current quote. <br />Mayor Webster reflected on past levy discussions and stated that she would prefer an amount <br />closer to six. She noted that during these preliminary discussions, the Council planned for the <br />levy amount to be higher than it typically is. <br />Finance Director Maloney reminded the Council that Union contracts have not yet been <br />finalized, and that this will also impact the levy amount. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked if this would be the highest possible amount for the levy. Finance <br />Director Maloney confirmed that Staff hoped it would not go any higher. <br />Councilmember Doolan asked what the City is estimating for Debt Services. Finance Director <br />Maloney stated that the current total levy amount for Debt Service is 2,099,000 dollars. Finance <br />Director Maloney stated that she has not yet looked into the Debt Services Fund. She confirmed <br />that her next step is to review the Debt Services Fund to determine whether any excess funds <br />are available to reduce the amount. She noted finding extra funds is the only way to lower this <br />amount, as it is based on the principal and interest payments for each of the individual debt <br />issues which are still outstanding. <br />City Manager Yunker clarified that these costs come from previous year’s projects, and <br />payments begin at different times depending upon the timing of projects. <br />Councilmember Doolan asked if the discussion of the CIP Fund increases was related to the <br />Public Safety Incentives. Finance Director Maloney clarified that it was not, and that 30,000 <br />dollars for the CIP Fund, 15,000 dollars for the Building Fund, and 5,000 dollars for the Park <br />Improvement Fund were scheduled increases to align with cost increases. <br />6