Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />II <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />October 22, 2013 <br />Page 3 <br />B. Appeal of City Ordinance 97.11; Decks. Mark Casey, City Manager, presenting. <br />C ity Manager Casey presented the appeal of the Fire Marshal 's decision and recited § 97.II(A) <br />of the City Code that states an open flame is prohibited in any structure containing three or more <br />dwelling units and that no person shall kindle, maintain , or cause any fire or open flame on any <br />balcony above ground level or on any ground floor patio within 15 ' of the structure. He advised <br />that Mr. Brown questioned the City Code and the Fire Marshal replied on September 19 ,2013, in <br />an email that stated "our interpretation of our existing ordinance remains the same. If a structure <br />has 3 or more dwelling units grilling is not allowed on any balconies or decks. Grilling on a <br />patio is acceptable if you can get 15 feet away from the structure." He advised that City staff <br />agrees with the Fire Marshal 's interpre tation, adding the ordinance applies to any structure <br />containing three or more dwelling units , whether a structure is one story or multi-storied makes <br />no difference for purposes of enforcement, and fires and open flames are prohibited on any <br />balcony above ground level and any ground floor patio within 15' of the structure; at the ground <br />level, whether it occurs on what is labeled a patio or deck or otherwise, an open flame within 15 ' <br />of the structure is expressly prohibited. <br />Mayor Faust stated that the City Manager is the City Zoning Administrator so he normally <br />handles these issues but if there is a conflict, someone can appeal to the City Council; in this <br />case, the City Council will have an opportunity to ask any questions of Mr. Casey, then Mr. <br />Brown will have an opportunity to speak and answer any questions of the City Council, and then <br />the City Council will discuss the appeal and adjudicate the issue. <br />Cou ncilmember Roth asked if a side-by-side unit, e.g., a duplex , could have a patio or deck and <br />be allowed to have a gas grill. <br />City Manager Casey stated the interpretation of the ordinance refers to balconies or decks in <br />dwelling units of three or more . <br />Fire Marshall Fuller stated the Fire Code defines a structure as the outer walls and the dwelling <br />units have to be within that structure so they are combined . <br />Council member Roth noted that the ordinance as stated does not specify if a patio is a wooden or <br />cement structure or whether a patio is defined as some type of non-flammable structure and <br />requested further information about the definition of a patio. <br />City Manager Casey stated the City Code does not define materials comprising a patio. <br />Councilmember Roth asked if the City Code makes the assumption that a patio is at ground <br />level. <br />Ci ty Manager Casey replied in the affirmative. <br />Mr. Ken Brown, 3422 Silver Lane NE, appeared before the City Council and stated that he felt <br />that § 97.11 does not apply to their situation because most of the townhomes have a deck on <br />ground level and the Code states that it prohibits decks above ground level. He stated the <br />Minnesota State Fire Code issued a fact sheet in 2003 and an "Appendix H" that the City