Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />February 8, 2005 <br />]'age 2 <br />IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 1'ODD HUi3iMER, WSl3 PRUSEWING <br />A. Resolution 05-22; Ordering 2005 Streett h�overnents,. <br />Mayor Faust opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. <br />5 Mr. Hubmer gave an overview of the street improvements and the method of assessments. He <br />6 reviewed which streets are being considered for improvements. He noted the sanitary sewer and <br />7 storm sewer will be replaced in each of the streets. All the water mains will be replaced as well <br />8 as new fire hydrants installed within the proposed improvement area. The anticipated cost is <br />9 $1,850,000. From this, $1.7 million will be paid for through the public utility bond. There will <br />10 be $1.50,000 paid out of storm sewer utility. The amount to be assessed to the residents is <br />11 $341,000. Ile said that public improvement bonds will be issued and the interest rate will be <br />12 calculated at 2% over the city bond rate at the time of assessment per annum. Ile noted the <br />13 initial assessment amounts have been mailed to the residents. The payment schedule will. be over <br />14 a period of 15 years. The first installment will be payable with general taxes for the levy year of <br />15 2005, collectible in 2006. If the entire assessment is paid. by November 30 of the assessment <br />16 year, no interest will be charged. <br />1.7 <br />18 Councilmember Stille pointed out that Resolution 05-023 states the interest is 2% over the <br />19 ` pritne" rate and suggested that needs to be changed. Mar. Hubmer responded the wording <br />20 should be changed to "cite bond". <br />21 <br />22 Dave Youngman, 2501 33" � Avenue N13, stated his property is on the corner of 33`4 and <br />23 Roosevelt. Ile said lie did assume they would need to pay assessments for the side footages. He <br />24 questioned how the calculations were made for the footage he was assessed on. Ile asked why <br />25 he is being assessed differently than. others living on 33`d Avenue. He also questioned whether <br />26 the 6% interest rate mentioned will change since the bonds have not yet been issued. He said he <br />27 thought that before a public hearing was held, final figures should be in so residents can plan on <br />28 those figures. He also requested a review of his assessment, and that it take place with him. in <br />29 attendance. <br />30 <br />31 Mr. Hubmer explained that the project is only on one side of Mr. Youngman's corner lot. The <br />32 assessment policy is that the city assesses 100% on the short side, which is considered the front <br />33 side. In Mr. Youngman's case, he has 100 feet of frontage on Roosevelt, and 150 feet on 33`4, <br />34 making the Roosevelt side the short side. The city will assess 100% of the side along Roosevelt. <br />35 Mr. Hubmer further explained that Mr. Youngman's neighbor's parcel has the long side along <br />36 Roosevelt. One-third of the Long side is assessed, and in this case it is 50 feet. He explained this <br />37 is the discrepancy Mr. Youngman sees in the assessment of his property versus his neighbor's. <br />38 <br />39 Mayor Faust asked Mr. Hubmer to explain the policy if the street improvements were on 33i' <br />40 Avenue, and not on Roosevelt. Mr. Hubmer stated that Mr. Youngman would then pay one-third <br />41 of the footage on 33`4 Avenue and his neighbor would pay 100% of the front footage. <br />42 <br />43 Mr. Youngman clarified that someone facing Roosevelt, even though they have more frontage <br />44 than he does, would only be assessed 50 feet for the improvements. Mr. Hubmer answered in. the <br />45 affirmative and said under the current assessment policy, the shortest dimension on the street is <br />46 considered frontage. <br />N <br />