My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05242005
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2005
>
CC PACKET 05242005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 12:03:52 PM
Creation date
5/7/2014 3:40:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
44 <br />feet of a residential zoning district. The conditions approved for this site in 2003 are listed below <br />and pertained to a popular bar and grill that was interested in locating to this site: <br />a. Garbage areas must be enclosed with materials that match buildings and must be located on <br />the southwest: corner. <br />b. Lighting must be "down -spill', with no spillage to residential properties across Kenzie <br />Terrace and conform to adjacent area (St. Anthony Boulevard). <br />c. Hours for outdoor seating shall not exceed 10:00 p.m. <br />d. No music or other artificial noise shall be audible from any residential district. <br />e. City engineers must approve the plan, including a determination that the proposed plan will <br />riot have an adverse impact on the current water run -of situation. <br />f. The patio will be. on the east side of the building. <br />g. Breakup mass and improve the landscape to the north side of the building. <br />h. The design of the building shall conform to the Savage store <br />I. Flours of operation shall coincide with liquor service hours. <br />Because the current proposed tenant is not to be located in the out lot, some of the original <br />conditions of the approved. CUP may not be appropriate to the end cap location. For example, <br />the restaurant will not have an outdoor seating area, the garbage area is enclosed within the <br />building, no landscaping requirements, and the patio location would. riot apply. <br />The proposed. tenants have applied .for a liquor license and are scheduled for Council review and <br />approval at the May 24th City Council tneeting. <br />B. CONDrEONAL Usi PLR MIT -Drive-Thru� Service Out Loi. AMCO is proposing to construct a <br />building on the Out Lot located at 2702 Highway 88 on the north end of the lot. One of the <br />proposed tenants for this proposed. bu.ildnag requires a drive-thru as part of their business. ]'he <br />City Ordinance at Section1635.03 (b) states this is a permitted use only with a Conditional Use <br />Permit. <br />C. VARIANCE Pf.TIPION Building Setback =Out hot. In revising the original site plan due to <br />changes in proposed uses and the location of those uses, A.MCON has presented a site plan that <br />proposes a 4,500 Sr building, which represents a reduction of the building footprint by 1,500 SF. <br />This revised site pian also reduces tlne number of variances required for the construction of the <br />building planned for the Out Lot. <br />Originally, they required two variances as the northeast and northwest corners of the proposed <br />building were in the building setbacks. The City Council granted those variances in 2003. <br />Resolution 03-053, approved. on July 15, 2003, identified the following findings of fact based on <br />hardships that exist for this property: <br />a. The property is currently blighted, poorly planned with regard. to layout and is art overall <br />detriment to the area. <br />b. Undue hardship exists and is a result of an oddly shaped parcel that is generally triangular <br />in shape with a rounded side. <br />c. These circumstances are not caused by the applicant or property owner. <br />d. The variance, if granted., would not alter the essential character of the locality, but would <br />essentially replace existing blighted structures with new, more aesthetically pleasing <br />buildings. <br />e. The property cannot be put to reasonable use without the requested variance because even <br />reconstructing the existing blighted buildings on their same footprints would require setback <br />variances. <br />11 APlaaniag\Staff Reports\20051ANICON staff icport 051705.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.