Laserfiche WebLink
Conditional Use Permit for the proposed restaurant being closer than 250 feet of a residential IS <br />zoning district. Since that restaurant was .never constprtcted, the originally approved CUP <br />expired. The cod ,ditions approved for this site in 2003 are listed below: <br />a. Garbage areas mu be enclosed with ytLials that match buildings and must be located on <br />the southwest corner. f <br />b. Lighting must be "down- pill",ff11 no spillage to residential properties across Kenzie <br />Terrace and conform to adl t area (St. Anthony Boulevard). <br />c. Hours for outdoor seatin s a not exceed 10:00 p.m. <br />d. No music or other artif' .ral noises aIl be audible from any .residential district. <br />e. City engineers mus pprove the da %,`including a determination that fit proposed plan will <br />not have an adve se impact on the curre� t water run -of situation. <br />f. The patio w37I eon the east side of the bui 'ng. <br />g. Break up mass and improve the Iandscape to north side of the building. <br />h. The design of the building shall conform to d1e de,' n of the existing main building. <br />i. Hours of operation shall coincide with liquor service ours. <br />B. VARIANCE PTTMON - Building Setback - Outlet. In revising the original site plan due to changes <br />in proposed uses and the location of those u.ses, AMCON has presented a site plan that proposes <br />a 4,500 SP building, which represents a reduction in size of the building footprint by 1,500 SP. <br />This revised site plan also reduces the number of variances required for the construction of the <br />building planned for the Outlet. <br />Section 1635.05, Subd. 4 of the City Ordinance states that the front yard of a_commerci.al. building <br />needs to be at least: 35 feet or a distance equal to the average of the front yard depths on the two <br />adjacent lots. Since this site is on a corner lot, the 35 -foot front yard requirement was used.. As <br />the revised site plan shows, the northwest corner is 5 feet from the property line and the <br />northeast corner is 12 feet from the property line. As Mr. Tucci states in Iris letter dated July 6, <br />2005, with the reduction of the size of the proposed restaurant, 8Ze new proposed plan <br />encroaches less into the setback than the original site plan that received a setback variance in <br />2001 The current site plan requires a variance of 30 feet for the northwest corner and a variance <br />of 23 feet for the northeast corner. Previously, Council had approved a variance of 30 feet for <br />each corner. <br />Resolution 03-053, A RESOLUTION RELATING TO VARIANCE REQUESTS FOR THE <br />PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OP THE CORNER OF K13,NZIE TERRACE AND HWIGHWAY <br />88, approved on July 15, 2003, identified the following Findings of Pact based on hardships that <br />exist for this property in support of granting the setback variance: <br />a. The property is currently blighted, poorly planned with regard to layout and is ann overall <br />detriment to the area. <br />b. Undue hardship exists and is a result of an oddly shaped parcel that is generally triangular <br />in shape with a rounded side. <br />c. These circumstances are not caused by the applicant or property owner. <br />d. The variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality, but would <br />essentially replace existing blighted structures with new, more aesthetically pleasing <br />buildings. The property cannot be put to reasonable use without the requested variance <br />because even reconstructing the existing blighted buildings on their same footprints would <br />require setback variances. <br />e. Economic considerations alone are not the basis for this request. <br />f.. The circumstances creating this hardship are unique to this oddly shaped property. <br />IBPIumming\Star£ Reports\2005V081605 Staff Report AMC ON Staff report.doc <br />