My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08232005
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2005
>
CC PACKET 08232005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 11:58:01 AM
Creation date
5/7/2014 3:40:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conditional Use Permit for the proposed restaurant being closer than 250 feet of a residential 27 <br />coning district. Since that restaurant was never constructed, the originally approved CUP <br />expired. The conditions approved for this site in 2003 are listed below: <br />a. Garbage areas must be enclosed with materials that match buildings and must be located on <br />the southwest corner. <br />b. Lighting must be "down -spill", with no spillage to residential properties across Kenzie <br />Terrace and conform to adjacent area (St. Anthony Boulevard). <br />c. Hours for outdoor seating shall not exceed 10:00 p.m. <br />d. No music or other artificial noise shall be audible from any residential district. <br />e.. City engineers must approve the plan, including a determination that the proposed plan will <br />not have an adverse impact on the current water run -of situation.. <br />f. The patio will be on the east side of the building. <br />g. Break up mass and improve the landscape to the north side of the building. <br />h. The design of the building shall conform to the desigin of the existing main building. <br />i. Hours of operation shall coincide with liquor service hours. <br />B. VARIANCE PEIM'TON - Building Setbacds - Outlet. hn revising the original site plan due Tb d..ianges <br />�n proposed. uses and the location of those uses, AVICO.N has presented a site ph 2 t /at proposes <br />a4,5 SF building, which represents a reduction u2 size of the building footprint y 1,500 SP. <br />Phis reused site pian also reduces the number of variances rc qu:ired for the cog iruction of the <br />bu lding planned for the Outlot. �// <br />Section 1635 rbd 4 of the City Ordinance states that Chu .front yard/off a connmerci.al building <br />needs to be at lea, feet or a distance equal to the average of the Vent yard depths on the two <br />adjacent lois. Since I�e is on a corner toil tlne 35 -foot: horn ytxid requirement was used. As <br />the revised site plan shows the northwest corner is 5 feet free the property line and the <br />northeast corner is 12 feet £ro 3 !ie property line. As Mr. TCtcci states un his letter dated July 6, <br />2005, with the reduction of the si�of the proposed r'e�.ta�urant, the new proposed plan <br />encroaches less into the setback than, he original si plan that received. a. setback variance n <br />2003. The current site plan requires ariance of/30 feet for the northwest corner and a variance <br />of 23 feet for the northeast corner. PrevioiIy�Counc l had approved a variance of 30 feet for <br />each corner. /\ <br />Resolution 03-053, A RESOLUTION KELATING TO VARIANCE REQUESTS FOR THE <br />PROPOSED REDEVELOP v1ENT P THE CORNER O]�KENIIE TERRACE AND HWIGHWAY <br />88, approved on July 15, 2003, ' entified the following Fin�dings of Pact based on hardships that <br />exist for th s property in su�rt of granting the setback vatilnce: <br />a. The proper/threa. <br />featly blighted, poorly planned with regal to layout and is an overall <br />detriment t <br />b. Undue harists and is a result of an oddly shaped parcel thais generally triangular <br />rounded side. <br />c. These ci umstances are not caused by the applicant or property ownei:, <br />d. The vk hance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality, but would <br />essentially replace existing blighted structures with new, more aesthetically'pleasing <br />buildings. The property cannot be put to reasonable use without the requeste hvariance <br />because even reconstructing the existing blighted buildings on their same footpr Mould <br />require setback variances. <br />e. Econom c considerations alone are not the basis for this request. <br />f. The circumstances creating this hardship are unique to this oddly shaped property. <br />H:AYta nki,,\Staff Reports\2005081605 Staff Report AMCON Staff report.doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.