My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 09132005
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2005
>
CC PACKET 09132005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 11:57:06 AM
Creation date
5/7/2014 3:40:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />August 23, 2005 <br />Page 4 <br />1 described in the Code. Stairs, eves and other projections from the house can come into that same <br />2 space. The Code states if it was written at that time, then it was not allowed. It provides no <br />3 different an obstacle than other protrusions that are allowed. Window wells are an allowable <br />4 encroachment into a side yard. Iie said they felt it met the test of the Code. They felt the <br />5 findings were not a stretch. They did feel that it should be approved. <br />6 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />>1 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />Councilmember horst pointed out a lot of thought was given by the Commissioners, which we <br />asked them to do. He said the Council should be careful on making changes. However, this <br />adds value to the house. It is a safety issue, and it is a smart idea whether anyone lives in the <br />basement or not. <br />Mr. Steadman explained the basement is finished and there is a bedroom down there. It is used. <br />Councilmember Horst stated the hardship has always been the hardest to prove. Ife said the <br />Council should carefully look at what the Planning Commission has done before the Council. <br />dismisses this. Ile said he is still in favor of approving the variance. <br />Mayor Faust reminded Councilmember 1lorst that when an egress window is added, it creates <br />another bedroom and that adds value. That is the reason the builders have put thein in. Ile said <br />he doesn't disagree that we should have them, but he said he thinks it should be done in a. <br />thoughtful manner. <br />Councilmember Stille said he is not against this kind of window. <br />Councilmember Gray stated he is inclined to agree with Councilmember Borst. When it is a <br />matter of safety, he said he doesn't see any reason to delay. It can increase the vahre. Ile said <br />the Council has to look at how they will allow these, and consider safety issues. The hardship <br />issue seems to be ever-changing, and he said he would Like to see it more defined. I -ie <br />commented he thinks this is important enough to go ahead and approve it. <br />Councilmember Thuesen commented he supports the applicant and the thought of safety. lie <br />said he hopes if this is denied, the applicant will be willing to resubmit a plan. <br />Ives- 2,1! ays - 3 (Stille, Thneneu and Moor I+aunt). Motion failed. <br />Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to deny Resolution 05- <br />064, re: Approve variance to side yard setback to install an egress window at 2909 30`x' Avenue. <br />Aves - 3, Nays - 2 (Horst and Gray). Motion carried. <br />C. Consider Resolution 05-065, re: to amend section 1640.02 of the zoning ordinance to <br />allow catering banquet activities as a conditional use in the industrial zoning districf. <br />Mr. Jenson reviewed the resolution with the Council and indicated that there was very little <br />discussion and it was approved unanimously at the Planning Commission meeting. <br />9) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.