My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 02142006
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2006
>
CC PACKET 02142006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 11:45:19 AM
Creation date
5/7/2014 2:28:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />January 24, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br />1 building. She stated that this land was previously an orchard, and suggested it may be nice to <br />2 address that in the renovation of the park and acknowledge the cultural history. <br />3 <br />4 She explained they had a meeting with the Park Commission, and the first option in designing <br />5 the park includes parking to the west. The number of parking spots remains the same. The <br />6 building is oriented between the playground and the hockey rink. There would be an arbor with <br />7 a small picnic pavilion coming off it. It includes a meandering perimeter path. She explained <br />8 that preliminary option 2 starts to structure items in the park based on the orchard. More <br />9 plantings are around the center of the park. Instead of having parking on one side of the park, <br />10 they extended parking into the park and added a lane for backing up. Parallel parking would be <br />11 on both the east and west sides of the park. There would be continuous pedestrian circulation <br />12 around the park. She noted the Park Commission seemed to prefer this option. Based on this <br />13 plan with the split parking, some things needed to be moved over to accommodate the soccer <br />14 field. <br />15 <br />16 Ms. Garbarini showed a preliminary idea for the equipment for the park. It ranges from toddler <br />17 equipment to the elementary aged structures. The focus is more on nets for safety. Water play is <br />18 based on the square footage that is allocated to this park, and what is most popular today. She <br />19 said this is what they used to develop a budget. She pointed out that schematic design would <br />20 need to continue with an architect. Schematic and design would continue into May. Bidding <br />21 would be from December to March, with a spring 2007 completion. <br />22 <br />23 Ms. Garbarini provided a preliminary cost estimate. She highlighted the major categories of Site <br />24 Preparation/Demolition; Earthwork; Bituminous; Concrete; Site Electrical; Miscellaneous Site <br />25 Improvements; Miscellaneous Landscape Improvement. The total is $1.2 million. She said they <br />26 are prepared to meet whatever budget requirements the city has. She noted that if the decision is <br />27 to move ahead with the schedule with the architect as mentioned, and an aquatic director should <br />28 be brought on board. She said they would like to hold another open house to get feedback and <br />29 make sure they are fully endorsing this as well. <br />30 <br />31 Councilmember Thuesen asked if during this process there were further studies on the potential <br />32 usage and if the need is there to upgrade the park. Ms. Garbarini said they did not receive <br />33 numbers from the recreation program specifically about winter sports. However, there was a <br />34 strong idea from the residents that they wanted to keep the park. <br />35 <br />36 Jay Hartmann noted that Emerald Park clearly is one of the highest users for the hockey rink and <br />37 recreational skating. <br />38 <br />39 Councilmember Thuesen asked if there could be surprised in the soils and in the performance of <br />40 moving it. Ms. Garbarini said the history that this was an orchard at one time is one indication <br />41 <br />42 that there could be problems. She said they would look into that. <br />43 Councilmember Thuesen questioned if the main building would act as a warming house. Ms. <br />44 Garbarini said it would work as a multi -use structure. <br />45 <br />46 Councilmember Thuesen inquired how open the area of trees and vegetation would be. Ms. <br />47 Garbarini responded there are trees there that would be limbed up. She said they would be very <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.