My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 07252006
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2006
>
CC PACKET 07252006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 11:28:51 AM
Creation date
5/7/2014 2:29:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recycling Collection Study <br />• Over 70 percent of end markets interviewed reported seeing more <br />contamination today than 5 years ago. <br />• Over 85 percent of the end -markets .interviewed said that they have <br />received both good and bad material from single -stream and dual - <br />stream facilities. <br />• The major glass market in Minnesota, a glass container manufacturer, <br />has experienced a dramatic decrease in the quantity of clean, color - <br />separated glass cullet, and attributes this decrease to increased sing -le - <br />stream recycling.. <br />Most problematic contaminants include glass, plastic bags/film plastic <br />and unacceptable paper grades at paper mills; glass and metal at <br />plastics manufacturers; and ceramics, pottery and mixed glass at glass <br />manufacturers. <br />• Most of the paper mills and all of the plastics manufacturers feel that <br />single=SU eaiII i recycling is a contributing factor to the de^l{ne in <br />feedstock quality. Other factors they identified include: <br />O contaminated loads from dual stream MRFs <br />O feedstock demand and pressures from- overseas markets <br />o reduction in public education efforts <br />a MRFs that emphasize material quantity versus quality. <br />Feedstock contaminants and problem loads of glass are just as likely to <br />come from dual stream MRFs as from single -stream MRFs. <br />Key recommendations for PCA staff <br />1. Develop educational materials and sponsor workshops for local <br />decision -makers that outline the advantages and disadvantages of <br />different. collection and processing methods and discuss options for <br />minimizing problems with any system. <br />2. Implement a registration or certification process for MRFs in Minnesota <br />that would give a better understanding of Minnesota's recycling rates <br />and infrastructure by requiring registered MRFs to report certain <br />information. <br />3. Clarify to all stakeholders the terms of the Solid waste Management <br />Tax exemption (Minn. Stat. 207H.06) to ensure adequate compliance. <br />4. Conduct further research into the feasibility of using optical sorting <br />technology for processing mixed broken glass from local MRFs, and of <br />possible public/private partnerships for the construction and operation <br />of an optical sorting facility. <br />: -7 4, p VA I <br />Primary author: Mr. Tim Goodman of Tim Goodman & Associates (St. <br />Louis Park, Minn.) <br />Appreciation goes out to the MRFs, end -markets, and equipment vendors that <br />participated in the study. Many of these companies and individuals graciously <br />shared their data, thoughts and opinions regarding the issues and impacts <br />associated with the processing of commingled recyclables. <br />led.cf <br />htt ://vvww.moea.state.mn.us/lc/commie m. 56 <br />.p g <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />6/7/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.