Laserfiche WebLink
Catt Size: <br />Too Too Small- Ri ht Size No Response <br />70 (17%) 18 (4%) 250(60%) 338 81% <br />. lot Enough Too Mush. � LustRi ht <br />Bi -Weekly Pick 1U : 30(70/o) 7(2%) . 3.04(73%) 74 18% <br />This survey, as I stated eatliet, was done onl with waltet's Recycling custotn.ets. The haulers fto <br />y y g tn. BFI and <br />Waste Management agreed to have Mt. Sedersttom do the survey. -They would all like to have the; City <br />Ordinance language changed to allow tecychng pick-up on a bi-weekly bass. <br />With a single -sort ro ate., all items that ate considered tec clable are put into one container; no �' � y � garbage is <br />allowed to be nixed with these tecyclables. Because garbage by ne' cessity has to be treated diffetentl , collecting <br />y g <br />it weekly continues to be desitable in St. Anthony fot the public health of the cot rauraty and the haulets ate in <br />agteen en.t with this tequiremen.t. Recyclable mate-tals ate con.sideted "clean" materials and as such, the industry <br />does not judge there to be a need fot this matetial to be collected weekly. <br />Several. Metro -area- cities, including: Blaine, Sh.oteview, Anoka, Arden I -I Us and New Btl. hton have adopted g � ox <br />will be adopting single -soft tecycl.i-qg ptogtai.s. . <br />Attachments: <br />Proposed Revised Otdinance Language <br />Walter's Recycling Survey Results and Covet .Letter <br />,�► Resident's E-mail . <br />4 Vatiou.s Articles, Meeting lNautes <br />Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance and. Minnesota Pollution. Control Agency Recycling <br />y g <br />Collection Study Summary (06/07/2006) ' <br />FAStaffReports105302006 Single Sort Recycling Ord Rev.do-c <br />25 <br />