Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19. <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />October 17, 2006 <br />Page 6 <br />one pylon. She clarified further the station could have a monument sign for every right-of-way, <br />but only one pylon. <br />Chair Stromgren stated the last seven words should be taken out, add a period after `sign,' and <br />take out the reference to curb cut. He restated how the sentence should read. <br />Assistant City Manager Moore -Sykes -summarized the recommended changes, additions, and <br />deletions under 1400.07 and 1400.12 for the Commissioners: She stated Staff would submit the <br />rewrite to the City Attorney to make sure it reads correctly. <br />Motion by Commissioner Jensen, seconded by Commissioner Hoska to recommend approval of <br />the proposed Language Change to Chapter 14, Signs to allow Electronic Gas Price Display Signs, <br />as amended and clarified by staff . <br />Motion carried unanimously <br />Chair Stromgren stated this would be presented at the October 24, 2006 City Council meeting for <br />the first of three readings. <br />Chair Stromgren recommended Mr. Archambeau have someone from the Mobil station attend <br />the City Council meeting to answer questions. <br />,1 f <br />A. 3�W Downers ,gave -- Stoop Encroachment in Front Yard <br />Assistant City Mia .. ager Moore -Sykes stated Mr. Mark Shadduck contStaff for information <br />on removing and reps ;ing his concrete driveway. She reported he what the process would <br />be if he wanted to ex a `} nd replace ' <br />XP pace the front stoop and step C1 Manager Moore - <br />Sykes informed Mr. Shaddiil he would need to determiner.:.: far from the front yard setback <br />the current stoop was and that t hie City ordinance did {allow an encroachment of a front stoop <br />'J r .,C" <br />b five feet. She reported Mr. hacl - fi additional Y S �.uck explain.. iat widening the stoop an add�tzonal 12 <br />p .. p . �� g p <br />inches would make it easier to assist a lderl... parent into the home and reduce the unsafe <br />impact a drip line had on the front stoop , ::? ~'ch caused an icy,slipperyhazard in the winter. <br />� <br />Assistant City Manager Moore -Sykes.: pla nsd the right-of-way is ten feet from the curb to the <br />lot line and the frontand setbac hich is 30 f`� ._ t from the lot line to the house is a <br />Y , <br />measurement substantiated b�: lot survey done in`' 92 b Kem er Surveyors. She re orted <br />Y p Y p <br />according to the property er, the existing front sto is approximately ht feet into the front <br />r . g <br />yard, three feet more t; ' the City Ordinance allows. Assn; p Y ei-:= .ant City Manager Moore -Sykes <br />stated the house w =constructed In 1965, making the curren�, , ont stoop grandfathered in. <br />Mr. Mark S`dduck, 3 609 Downers Drive, appeared before the Coomission to answer questions. <br />Chair St omgren asked Mr. Shaddock if the existing stoop projected eigl Nqet from the house <br />and was it connected to the home and on a foundation. <br />W <br />