Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 43 <br />Additional Comments from the Planning -Commission.• The following comments were received from <br />the Planning Commissioners during the April 17, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting. <br />• The Commissioners asked about font size. They were concerned that the font used would be too <br />large causing the City's code to exceed the 500 -page base price as stated in the bid proposal. The current City <br />Code is at approximately 392 pages; the font size is Times New Roman #12. This font seems to be the <br />standard format for most agencies and is die one used by the City. Also, at Section II (4), it states that the <br />number of pages will be "according to the format option of the City." Should die re -codified document <br />exceed the 500 -sheet base price, the additional cost would be approximately $18 pet page beyond a 5% <br />tolerance for 500 sheets, single column page. <br />• In response to the Commissioners' concern about the City being precluded from putting the re - <br />codified code on the City's wet) site, Staff reviewed the list of cities provided by Mr. Ray Bollhauer, American <br />Legal Publishing, and searched their sites. Several cities continue to have their city code on their own site; <br />others have chosen to have American Legal Publishing host their city code. It seems to be an option rather <br />than a requirement. <br />• The Commissioners also questioned a license fee for the re -codification work and additional copies <br />of the City's code once the work was completed. The base price includes 20 printed copies of the revised <br />City code. The only licensure that Staff found that may be required is for the optional service, Folio Search <br />and Retrieval program. <br />Attachments: <br />• Copy of a bid from LMC/American Legal Publishing Corp. <br />7:\Goal Setting\2007\053107 LMC reeodification proposal staff report.doc <br />