Laserfiche WebLink
47 <br />IV. Fundraising <br />As discussed at the April 21, 2009 Public Hearing, Schools and Athletic Programs are <br />required to be more creative to keep pace with the funding of their distinct programs. <br />Unfortunately, St. Anthony is not exempt from this situation. In order to continue to provide a <br />reputable youth and high school athletics program available for all children, combined with <br />offering the opportunity for life-long athletics, SAVHS and the Sports Boosters, in coordination <br />with organizations such as SABA, need to look to the greater community to fund these endeavors <br />so as not to unfairly levy taxpayers for these charges. While the individual athletic programs <br />perform a variety of fundraising from "Gold Cards" to bake sales and car washes, by itself the <br />budget cuts have continued at a rate faster than the fundraising can keep up with. The signage <br />method has been successful in other towns—in fact, its nostalgic feel has been a drawing point <br />to other small towns rural and suburban, given the popularity of "Town Ball Baseball"—and <br />could assist St. Anthony to be considered a part of these unparalleled communities. <br />Because of the unique circumstances and times we are under, and because of a lack of <br />any track record, it would likely not be fair at this point to require a cap on fundraising. To be <br />sure, it is not likely that a signage program will anytime soon produce sufficient funds to run an <br />athletics program—and if it did, such would not be a terrible problem to have. However, it is <br />anticipated that the Conditional Use process would require a presentation as to how the funds <br />would be used for a particular signage program. <br />Therefore we oppose any cap on fundraising since it is not likely that the signage <br />program will produce funds in a range that would necessitate such a cap. Furthermore, the desire <br />here is to enable local businesses to be involved—and given the cost limitations that local <br />businesses have in their advertising budgets, a cap would not be helpful. <br />V. Conclusion <br />This Ordinance Amendment would provide sufficient flexibility in allowing signage <br />commonly found in other communities supporting local athletics, yet forbidden by St. Anthony's <br />Code, while at the same time ensuring that any signage utilized through the Amendment is <br />appropriate and respectful considering its circumstances. This Ordinance Amendment is merely <br />the pathway to allow signage to be erected, and is not the destination itself—it is the doorway <br />that would eliminate signage that never would be acceptable. <br />Approval of this Ordinance Amendment will not yield carte blanche for the School <br />District to start placing commercial signs around its athletic facilities; rather, it will allow only <br />SABA to present a plan for a signage program for consideration under the Conditional Use <br />process through the Planning Commission. <br />Thus, we encourage the adoption and approval of this Ordinance Amendment, as we <br />believe it in the best interest of the Cormmunity, and any potential drawbacks are still protected <br />by the Conditional Use process. <br />