Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />October 13, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br />1 savings that would be associated with using less water and dropping down a tier. He stated his <br />2 position that there is support for clean water and water conservation, which is shown by the tax <br />3 increase voted into effect a few years ago. <br />4 <br />5 Mayor Faust thanked the public for the comments. He commented that the City has taken a <br />6 conservative, measured approach with this issue. They will be sensitive to benchmarking this in <br />7 the future. The ultimate goal is to conserve water. <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />Councilmember Roth suggested that in order to make more of an impact, Option 2 be amended <br />with the following differential between tiers: 10% / 15% / 25%. <br />Councilmember Gray noted approximately 50% of the households are in Tier I, and that there is <br />no incentive for these individuals to reduce their water consumption. He stated his position that <br />the focus should not be limited to the other 50% of users. <br />Councilmember Stille indicated he would be supportive of the amendment proposed by <br />Councilmember Roth. He pointed out that the rates will be revisited annually and can be adjusted <br />in the future. He suggested publishing the citywide water consumption quarterly. <br />Councilmember Thuesen stated his preference for Option 2, and indicated he would be agreeable <br />of the amendment proposed by Councilmember Roth. In regard to the concern raised about Tier I <br />by Councilmember Gray, there is likely some conservation occurring with this group simply <br />because there is not a lot of use by this tier. He would not propose increasing this tier at this time, <br />but it should likely be reviewed by future City Councils. <br />Mayor Faust suggested implementing an additional tier by amending the tiers as follows: <br />0 — 7,500 Gallons Tier I <br />7,501 — 15,000 Gallons Tier II <br />15,001 — 22,500 Gallons Tier III <br />22,501 — 30,000 Gallons Tier IV <br />Over 30,000 Gallons Tier V <br />*Minimum Bill 7,500 Gallons <br />Remain at $2.60 base rate <br />Percentage split between tiers: 5% / 10% / 15% / 25% <br />Council consensus was to direct staff to include the first reading of Ordinance 33.036 on the <br />October 27, 2009 City Council meeting with the above rate structure as suggested by Mayor <br />Faust. <br />B. Update on Sewer Rates. <br />City Manager Mornson reported that based on 2008 financial data, the City Auditor <br />recommended a sewer rate increase. Operating revenues totaled $797,360 compared to <br />rd <br />