Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br />To: Mayor & City Council <br />Mike Morrison, City Manager <br />From: Kim Moore -Sykes, Assistant City Manager <br />Date: April 27, 2010 <br />Subject: 3038 Harding Street — Variance to Front Yard Setback <br />Requested Action: Variance to 152.177 ()) Front Yard Encroachment <br />Date Application Received: Match 24, 2010 <br />Property Address: 3038 Harding Street <br />Zoning District: R1 <br />60 -Day Expires: May 24, 2010 <br />Waiver Letter Required: Yes Date Sent: No X <br />Future Action: Council Consideration, April 27, 2010 <br />Background: Staff received a call from Jeremiah Battles, Acacia Architects, informing staff that Chuck Bower <br />and Holly Wick Bower, the property owners at 3038 Harding Street, were interested in adding a front porch to <br />their house as a part of a larger renovation project that they are planning. Mr. Battles asked about the City's <br />front yard setback regulations and if a front porch was possible. In discussing the proposed front porch, it was <br />determined that the residential structure's front foundation wall sits on the edge of the front yard setback. The <br />City Zoning Ordinance allows for a five (5) foot encroachment into the front yard (§ 152.177(D)). <br />Mr. Battles advised staff that their plans provide for a six (6) foot wide porch. 1Ie reported that typically, a <br />traditional front porch is six (6) to eight (8) feet wide. He asked about the possibility o£ applying fora variance <br />to allow for the snore traditional front porch that the), are planning because the property owners are looking for <br />a front porch that would be more conducive to having an outdoor living space. He and the owners presented <br />then- proposal for the front porch to the Planting Commission in a concept review at the March 16`x' Planning <br />Commission meeting. A founal application for a variance was submitted to and accepted by the City. <br />Application Review <br />As part of the application process, the applicant is required to provide evidence that discloses facts that a e <br />unique to the subject property. Section 152.245 of the City Ordinance outlines the requirements that must be <br />addressed to qualify for a variance and the process by which a variance is granted. Specifically Section 152.245 <br />(C) states that no variance will he granted unless evidence presented supports the following facts and that: strict <br />enforcement of the City's Ordinance would cause undue hardship because: <br />1.) The property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance. <br />2.) The circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the owner. <br />3.) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential characteristics of the locality. <br />04202010 Council stf rpt 3038 Harding St FY Encroachment Variance. doc <br />0 <br />