My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08242010
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010
>
CC PACKET 08242010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 10:25:51 AM
Creation date
4/30/2014 4:45:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />August 10, 2010 <br />Page 3 <br />1 informed that Apache Redevelopment LLC approached the City to enter into a new development <br />2 agreement to finish out certain portions of the Silver Lake Redevelopment as Phase IIIA, Phase <br />3 III13, and Phase IIIC. She provided an overview of the following proposed business terms for the <br />4 new Phase III Development Agreement: 1) General; 2) Surviving Provisions of the Phase I <br />5 Development Agreement; 3) Surviving Provisions of the Phase II Development Agreement; 4) <br />6 Conveyance of Vacant Apache Office Site (North Portion of Phase IIIA); 5) Phase III Tax <br />7 Increment; 6) Redeveloper Obligations; 7) Payment of Special Assessments; 8) Development <br />8 Timeframe; 9) Reporting Requirements; 10) Events of Default. <br />10 Councilmember Stille inquired about risks associated with the tax increment if nothing were to <br />11 transpire with the development. Ms. Kvilvang stated if the developer does not perform by <br />12 December 31, 2011 the City will be in a position with a need for the land to be sold for the <br />13 proceeds and future increment to be able to pay Fannie Mae. The developer is requesting to <br />14 receive their makeup note for the 200 units they developed in the hopes to bring them to some <br />15 level of profit. <br />16 <br />17 Councilmember Stille stated his position that Fannie Mae should receive priority of being paid <br />18 over the developer. He questioned if there have been environmental studies completed on the <br />19 property the City would acquire. City Attorney Lindgren replied that there were not any issues <br />20 noted with the environmental study previously completed. This issue would be reviewed again <br />21 prior to a closing on the property. <br />22 <br />23 Councilmember Stille inquired who would determine the rate to be applied to the makeup note. <br />24 Ms. Kvilvang replied that the market and underwriters will determine the rate applied to the <br />25 makeup note; the remaining portion would likely be set at that same rate. <br />26 <br />27 Councilmember Stille inquired about the expiration of the TIF district. Ms. Kvilvang replied that <br />28 the TIF district expires at the end of 2030 with the last increment receipt in 2031. <br />29 <br />30 Mayor Faust requested clarification regarding the definition of "commencement of construction" <br />31 as outlined in Term No. 7 of the proposed Phase III Development Agreement. City Attorney <br />32 Lindgren advised as the agreement has been negotiated this term has been defined as the date a <br />33 building permit is pulled. <br />34 <br />35 Mayor Faust verified with City Manager Morrison that a one year time period is allowed to build <br />36 a project once a permit is pulled. He stated his position that Term No. 7 as defined allows for too <br />37 much wiggle room and should be reconsidered. He requested clarification regarding the <br />38 following statement included in the proposed resolution: "Whereas, the Parties have agreed to <br />39 cancel all rights and obligations under the Phase I Agreement and Phase II Agreement related to <br />40 the Phase IIB Senior Housing Development." City Attorney Lindgren explained that the Phase <br />41 II Agreement is now embodied in the proposed Phase III Agreement. <br />42 <br />43 Councilmember Roth questioned what the reason is for the length of time the subject property <br />44 has been sitting vacant without development beginning. Ms. Kvilvang discussed the current <br />45 condition of the capital markets and the economic downturn. <br />46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.