My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 01102012
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2012
>
CC PACKET 01102012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 9:38:25 AM
Creation date
4/30/2014 4:42:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
47 <br />CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br />RESOLUTION 12-015 <br />RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE. TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE <br />TO ALLOW A SECOND IDENTIFICA'T'ION SIGN FOR <br />lIENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CLINIC <br />AT THE MARKETPLACE SHOPPING CENTER <br />WHE'RI;AS, Mr. Richard Lang of Visual Communications contacted City staff advising <br />them that Hennepin County Medical Clinic is locating at the Market Place <br />Shopping Center and wanted to discuss the need for a second identification <br />sign; and <br />WHEREAS, Staff advised Mr. Lang that City Ordinance §155.29 (13) (1) allows only one <br />identification sign; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Lang, as the representative for Hennepin County Medical Clinic <br />applied for a variance to the City's Sign Ordinance to allow for a second <br />identification sign; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the variance request on <br />December 20, 2011; and <br />WIIERLAS, The Planning Commission determined that the Hennepin County Medical <br />Clinic's request for a variance to the sign ordinance to allow a second <br />business identification sign has met the criteria as specified in the City <br />Code's Zoning Ordinance, § 152.245 (C) which states that no variance will <br />be granted unless evidence presented supports that strict enforcement of the <br />City Ordinance would cause practical difficulties for the applicant. <br />1. The property cannot be put to ,treasonable use without the <br />variance due to the architecture in the planned unit development; <br />2. That the circumstances causing the practical difficulty were not <br />created by the tenant; <br />3. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />characteristics of the locality; <br />4. That economic considerations alone are not the basis for the <br />practical difficulty; <br />5. That the circumstances causing the practical difficulty are <br />unique to the individual lot; and <br />6. The granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.