Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 09251984 Meeting Sheet IIIIII IIIII-IIIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII ioosis Box: 16 Folder: CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987 Document: CC PACKET 09251984 H.R.A. ItIMEDIATELY FOLLO!JING — REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. CITY OF ST. ANTHONY COUNCIL AGENDA September 25, 1984 7:30 P.M. A. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call . C. Approval of September 11 , 1984 Council Minutes . D. Licenses/Permits/Petitions. E. Presentation of Claims. 1 . Verified Claims. 2. Edward J. Hance - S1 ,536.00. F. Reports. 1 . Planning Commission September 18, 1984 Minutes. a. Variance request - Stan Fabel , 2509 - 29th Avenue N.E. b. Ordinance interpretation - Arthur Peele, 2621 - 32nd Avenue N.E. • 2. Departments and Committees. a. Fire Department Monthly Report - August , 1984. b. Financial Monthly Report - August, 1984. 3. City Manager. a. Presentation of a Slide Tape of the April 26th Tornado. b. St. Paul Pioneer Press News Article, re: PERA Board's Use of Funds for Defense. c. Terry Schuster and Mike Dems Will Be Present, re: Marketing Cable T.V. d. 1985 City Budget (discussion and recommendations) . Final Public Hearings Set for October 9, 1984. G. Public Hearings. H. New Business. 1 . Resolution 84-042, re : request for resolution of support of a speedskating arena in Roseville. I . Unfinished Business. 1 . Ordinance 1984-005, re: Repealing gambling and betting sections. • J. Adjournment. • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY COUNCIL MINUTES September 11 , 1984 The Mayor called the meeting to order. at 8:01 P.M. , just after polls for the primary election had closed. Present for roll call : Marks, Ranallo, Sundland, and Makowske. Absent: Enrooth (.arrived at 8:05 P.M. ) . Also present: William Soth, City Attorney; David Childs, City Manager; and Carol Johnson, Finance Director. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Mayor Sundland to approve as submitted the minutes of the budget work session conducted by the Council August 20, 1984. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to approve as submitted the minutes of the budget work session conducted by the Council August 27, 1984. Motion carried unanimously. • Councilman Enrooth arrived during the discussion of and before the vote on the - - acceptance of the August 28th regular Council meeting. The following changes were made to those minutes: Page 1 , para. l : Insert "of" between "Pledge" and "Allegiance". para. 4: Insert following the proposed amendments to the August 28th minutes: "Motion by Councilman Makowske and seconded by Council - man Marks to approve as amended the minutes of the Council meeting held August 14, 1984. Motion carried unanimously. " Page 5, para. 3: Insert "approving the St. Anthony Court signage" between "motion" and the comma in the last line. Page 7, para. 5: . Insert "concept" between "give" and "approval ". Motion by Councilman Makowske and seconded by Mayor Sundland to approve as amended the minutes of the Council meeting held August 28, 1984. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Makowske to approve the registration and grant the licenses listed in the September 11th Council agenda as • follows: Multiple Housing Registration Cameron Properties for 3721 Chandler Drive. -2- Contractors License Herbst. & Sons Construction Co. , Inc. ,. New. Brighton. Heating License Bowler Company Hoff Plumbing Del Air Conditioning, Inc. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to approve payment of all verified claims listed for August 31 and September 11 , 1984, in the .September 11th Council agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Makowske and seconded by Mayor Sundland to approve payment of $26,304. 16 to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, representing the install - ment due April 1 , 1984 for the sewer services to the City. Motion carried unanimously. Copies had been distributed of the September 11th letter from the Municipal Caucus to the Waste Control Commission urging an immediate selection of the consultant to perform an independent management study of the Commission at the same time the Caucus acknowledged the cost would eventually be paid by the metropolitan communities in their rates. The Council indicated concurrence with the recommendation before ordering the letter filed. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Makowske to approve payment of 516,832 to Hennepin County for services rendered by the County Assessor under the contract due September, 1984. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Childs affirmed that the City would be reimbursed from Superfund monies for the engineering costs related to the water connection with Roseville and said the state had already been billed for the costs which the Council had before them that evening. . Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to approve payment of $16,956.24 to Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. for engineering consulting services from March 28 through July 28, 1984 on the Roseville water connection project. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman- Ranallo and; seconded by Councilman Marks to approve payment of $1;371 .72 to Dorsey & Whitney for legal services rendered during July, 1984. Motion carried unanimously. • Dick Peacha and Ted Holsten of the St. Anthony Kiwanis Club presented their organi- zation 's request to -conduct -their -annual Peanut Day fund raiser in the City -3- September 28th. -Donations frw Council and staff were accepted and pictures were taken by the Bulletin reporter. Motion by Councilman Marks and. seconded by Councilman Ranallo to authorize the Kiwanis Peanut Day fundraiser to be conducted on St. Anthony streets September 28, 1984. Motion carried unanimously. The Mayor reported he had received a call from Douglas Kentock the previous even- ing regarding what Mr. Kentock considered to be an increase in air flights over the City. Mr. Kentock suggested the City might request the same noise measurements be taken for this area as are being taken for cities near the airport. Mayor Sundland said this call had reinforced his own observations while attending the Miracle Sunday observance at Faith Methodist Church, where the speaker's address was drowned out by the sound of large planes flying overhead. He reminded those present that this was not an unusual occurence since, in response to resident complaints in 1982 and 1983, he had written to the Metropolitan Airport Commission questioning at that time whether the airport traffic patterns had not been altered to send more flights over the City. It was the Mayor's recommendation tht he, the City Manager, and several concerned residents should meet with the Commission Chairman to discuss the problem. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to direct the Mayor and City Manager to set up an appointment with the Chairman of the Metropolitan Airport Commission to discuss with him what is perceived by the City to be an increase in air traffic over St. Anthony. Motion carried unanimously. The Chemical Abuse Information Committee had conducted its Kids, _Sports and Drugs program for high school students the previous Tuesday night, Councilman Marks reported and the response had convinced the Councilmember that "the greater com- munity is concerned about the drug problem among City youths". Councilman Marks reported each student who participates in a school activity had to sign a pledge not to use drugs or alcohol , which was witnessed by his or her parent. The success of this program can only be evaluated in the years to come, the Councilman said. At 8:22 P.M. , the Mayor opened the public hearing to receive resident input on the allocation of what is estimated would be approximately $33,857 in Revenue Sharing funds for 1985. A notice of the hearing had been published in the August 28th Bulletin and posted at various locations throughout the City. When no one present responded to the Mayor 's invitation to speak to the issue, Councilman Marks inquired whether the funds could be used for the senior housing 202 project. He was told that-;such funds had traditionally been used for capital equipment purchases and building maintenance, for which the need would be great next year. The Mayor indicated the City had historically stayed away from utilizing these funds for long term expenses like salaries which could present major funding problems for the City if, .Revenue Sharing is eliminated in .the future. The, hearing was closed at 8:25- PX with the final budget to be prepared by staff • for Council approval at a later date. -4- During the consideration.- of the August liquor operations summary, the Manager com- mented that he was amazed that the revenues from -Store 1 had- dropped only 50% • due to the opening of the warehouse. in the same area. . Councilman Ranallo indicated he perceived it only supported the strength of consumers '- -purchase -habits, which he believes would soon become apparent to another community nearby who -had closed their main outlet when they opened a liquor warehouse. In considering the listing of 1983 uncollectible checks for the municipal liquor stores, Councilman Makowske inquired why a $1 ,600 item was- listed as uncollectible when the writer was making restitution. Mr. Soth indicated that he assumed it was probably an auditor's bookkeeping procedure decision. The. Manager indicated staff would continue to try to collect these checks whenever it was economically prudent to do so._ .Councilman Enrooth indicated he believed writing off a couple of thousand dollars in bad checks was more than offset by the check cashing revenue of $41 ,084.19 in 1983. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to authorize the write-off of $2,905.67 in municipal liquor store uncollectible checks for 1983 as listed in the September 11 , 1984 Council agenda. Motion carried unanimously. The Manager had in his September 7th memorandum, addressed the changes in procedures undertaken by staff in response to the management recommendation from the auditor, which included the establishment of separate checking for H.R.A. funds. The September 6th staff notes and North Suburban Cable Commission 1985 budget were ordered filed as informational as was the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's August 30th listing establishing sites for permanent priorities for MPCA removal or remedial action related to releases or threatened releases of hazardous sub- stances, pollutants and contaminants, which included the site suspected to be the source of the City's contaminated water problems. Mr. Childs indicated he would research the merchandising efforts towards cable - service in the City and would report back to the Council at their next meeting. Councilman Ranallo discussed• the request from the National . League of Cities that the City designate a voting delegate and alternate to the 1984 Congress of Cities to be held in Indianapolis, November 24-28. The Councilman stated that he perceived it was essential to have other Council members, in addition to himself, become well known in the League. He said many of the appointments for the National Conference in Washington, D.C. , would be made at the Indianapolis conference and he would, therefore, like to see at least one of the other Council members attend that con- ference. The designation of a delegate and alternate to the Indianapolis meeting was deferred until the next Council meeting. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Mayor Sundland to adopt the resolution which designated Offerman and Co. as a depository for investments, as the City Manager ..had recommended in his September 7th memorandum. RESOLUTION 84-041 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A DEPOSITORY FOR CITY FUNDS • Motion carried unanimously. i -5- If the next Council agenda is not too heavy, Mr. Childs said he would be scheduling • for that meeting the 18 minute slide-tape presentation on ,the April 26th tornado developed by Lee Entner, who is making the same presentation before various service organizations and groups throughout the City. Mayor -Sundland indicated!-,,the Fire Chief is the guest speaker for the Kiwanis meeting September 26th . The Manager drew the Council 's attention to the fact that, as recommended by the auditor, the proposed budget modification resolution included the source of revenue which would finance the expenditures. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Makowske to adopt the resolution which authorizes the budget modifications necessary to bring the 1984 salary and fringe benefits negotiated with the unions into balance with the expendi- tures anticipated for this year. RESOLUTION 84-035 A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE 1984 BUDGET Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to .adopt the resolution which addresses a change in assessment rolls brought by the replatting of certain properties to accomodate the reconstruction of County Road D. RESOLUTION 84-036 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Makowske to adopt the . resolution which appropriates the City 's share of the costs of reconstructing County Road D from Municipal State Aid Street funds. RESOLUTION 84-037 APPRECIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS TO C..S.A.H. OR T.H. PROJECT Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Mayor Sundland to adopt the resolution which establishes the trust for the employees ' deferred compensation plan. RESOLUTION 84-038 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman- Makowske- and seconded by Councilman Marks to adopt. the. resolution which authorizes. the �purchase of the Doppler Radar system. f.or- donation to the Nat-ional Weather Service under the terms -of the agreement with the-:Weather Service. -6- RESOLUTION 84-039 1 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE .MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER • TO ENTER INTO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF A DOPPLER RADAR SYSTEM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to adopt Resolution 84-040. E RESOLUTION 84-040 ! A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO THE AGREEMENT WITH KAVOURAS, INC. REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF A DOPPLER RADAR SYSTEM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY Motion carried unanimously. i In his September 7th memorandum, Mr. Childs had addressed the proposed ordinance amendment which was written to bring the City ordinances into conformance with recent legislation regarding the regulation of gambling activities by non-profit organizations which will now be under the jurisdiction of the state agencies. A revised version of the ordinance had been-distributed to the Council members and Mr. Soth confirmed that the City would no longer be issuing licenses for bingo. Motion by Mayor Sundland and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to approve the first reading of Ordinance 1984-005. • r ORDINANCE 1984-005 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS 445:00 THROUGH 445:35 (BINGO) AND SECTIONS 905:00 AND 905:05 (BETTING) OF THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES, AS AMENDED G Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Makowske and seconded by Councilman Marks to approve the third reading and adopt Ordinance 1984-004. ORDINANCE 1984-004 a AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION; AMENDING SECTION 305 OF THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES i Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Enrooth and seconded by Mayor Sundland to adjourn the meeting at 8: 55 P.M. for the meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority which followed,. ` { Respectfully submitted, Helen Crowe, Secretary • ATTEST: Mayor CITY OF ST. ANT11 ONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution Licenses/Permits September 20, 1984 Ordinance Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Licenses/Permits Other September 25, 1984 for Council Approval ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: Lila Johnson, License/Billing Clerk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMPIARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: HEATING LICENSES Neil Heating & Air Conditioning MOTOR VEHICLE STARTING LICENSES Apache Mobile Service CONTRACTORS LICENSES Eugene Posthumus Construction Inc . , Brooklyn Park Horizon Development Co. , Roseville Berg Remodelers, White Bear Lake Hage Construction Company, Edina Mastercraft Construction Corporation, St. Louis Park R. C. Witt Construction, Roseville Gawel & Knaeble Contractors, Inc. , Minneapolis ALTERNA=7ES : RECOMMENDATION: CITX MANAGER' S EVIEW: COMMENTS : i4�L C. I T Y O F S T A N T H O N Y ii/E. 9/25/84 A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E PAGE 1 VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK NO. TYPE DATE NO. AMOUNT • 00235 AT&T INFORMATION SYSTEMS R 9/25/.84 06983 561.60 00245 AUTO PAINT SPEC INC R 9/25/84 06984 65.04 00280 BARTON CONTRACTING R 9/25/84 06985 113.30 00430 BRIGHTON AUTO ELECTRIC R 9125/84 06986 24.26 00880 ENTNER, LELAND R 9/25/84 06987 200.00 010.80 GATEWAY HARDWARE R 9/25/84 06988 163.72 01110 GENERAL IND SUPPLY R 9/25/84 06989 30.05 01140 GENUINE PARTS CO R 9/25/84 06990, 46.75 01200 GOHPER- BEARING R 9/25/84 06991 29.10 01360 HALLING BROS R 9/25/84 06992 15.69 01420 HAWKI NS CHEMICAL R 9/25/84 06993 138.75 01480 HEALY _LABORATORIES R 9125/84 06994 37.40 0900 LAKELAND ENG + E6UIPMT CO R 9/25/84 06995 87.00 019.60 LA YNE . MI NNE SOTA CO R 9125184 06996 730.00 02045 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR -- R 5/25/84 06997 :56.15 02285 MIDWEST AREA INC R 9/25/84 06998 9v172.52 02290 MIDWEST PAINT MFG CO R 9/25/84 06999 293.,13 02380 MINNEGASCO INC R 9/25/84 07000 6S8.04 025.80 NEW BRIGHTON HARDWARE R 9/25/84 07001 190.45 02680 NORTHERN STATES POWER R 9/25/84 07002 5 ,943.54 02700 NW BELL TELEPHENE CO R 9/25/84 07003 103.63 02740 OLSON RADIATOR, DAVE R 9/25/84 07004 38.75 02805 PENNSYLVANIA OIL COMPANY R 9/25/84 07005 84.00 02830 PERLICK AUTO BODY R 9/25/84 07006 193.00 02860 PFEIFFER, RICHARD R- 9/25/84 07007 200.00 03315 SERCO LABORATORIES R 9/25/84 07008 66.00 03660- RAMSEY COUNTY R 9/25/84 07009 37.98 03720 W W GENERATOR REBUILDERS R 9/25/84 07010 37.75 03730 WARNER TRUE VALUE HONE R 9/25/84 07.011 29.31 C3840 YEP MFG CO R 9/25/84 07012 31. 80 06585 ELAINE GCRSKE R 9/25/84 07013 56.10 06586 MARY ANN THORSFELOT R 9125/84 07014 51.00 06587 MACKLYN HARRIS R 9125/84 07015 54.40 065:88 MARJORIE MADDEN R 9/25/84 07016 57.80 06589 DORIS HALL R 9/25/84 07017 57.80 06590 LORRAINE BRENNE R 9125/84 07018 57.80 06591 LAVERN MONSON R 9/25/84 07019 56.10 06592 GAYLE KENNEDY R 9/25/64 07020 53.55 06593 FRANCES MEYERS R 9/25/84 07021 56.10 06594 DOLORES HERTOG R 9/25/84 07022 56.10 065.95 ETHEL PLASEK R 9/25/84 07023 56.10 06596 PATRICIA BR IDGEMAN R 9/25/84 07024 .56.10 065.97 MARY SCHWAAB R 9125/84 07025 56. 10 065-98 HELEN GLOTZBACK R 9/25/84 07026 56.10 06599 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO R 9/25/84 07027 52.92 0660C J S R ENTERPRISES R 9/25/84 07028 15.00 06601 OFFICE PRODUCTS R 9/25/84 07029 80.50 06602 AMERICAN STORES R 9/25/84 07030 10.82 06603 STEWART LUMBER CG R 9/25/84 07031 171.42 06604 SAFEWAY SLING CO R 9/25/84 07032 25.00 • C I T Y G F S 7 A N T H O N Y . f'YE 9/25/84 A C C 0 U N. T S P A Y A B L E PAvE 2 VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK NO. TYPE LATE NO: AMOUNT 06605 NCB. SUBR REG MUT ' AID ASSOC R 9125/84 07033 178.00 TYPE TOTAL 21, 238.52 TOTAL 21,238.52 VW LAW OFFICES STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT EDWARD J. HANCE y • SAINT ANTHONY NATIONAL BANK BUILDING.SUITE 200 DATE: September 11 , 1984 2001 LOWRY AVENUE NORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55418 Mr. David Childs PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH YOUR REMITTANCE. City Manager City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418 AMOUNT REMITTED $ IN RE : St. Anthony Prosecutions for September 5 , 1984 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE DESCRIPTION ffllm= $ PAYMENTS CREDITS&ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENTS • UNPAID PREVIOUS BALANCE FINANCE CHARGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Please see attached itemization. Costs advanced: Photocopies - $36 . 00 $ 36 . 00 CURRENTFEES $1 , 500. 00 $ o MINIMUM PAYMENT DUE • Accounts due upon presentment of statement. A FINANCE CHARGE at a periodic rate of 11/3% per month,equaling an AN- NUAL PERCENTAGE RATE of 16% will be imposed upon any Unpaid Previous Balance greater than $1.00, with a minimum FINANCE CHARGE of$0.50.The FINANCE CHARGE is applied to the outstanding balance at the end of each billing cycle,if the balance for that billing cycle was not paid in full within 30 days. NOTICE:See reverse side for important information. • ITEMIZED STATEMENT 8/2/84 Review complaints 8/2/84 Telephone conference with Attorney Steigauf, attorney for David Campbell regarding gross DWI reports 8/2/84 Review complaints 8/7/84 Telephone conference with SAPD; telephone conference with Jim Roelshouse, attorney for Jadnick 8/7/84 Telephone conference with Ray Nelson; letter to Judge Christenson regarding Ring 8/8/84 Telephone conference with Hazce of BCA regarding com- paints on Tigner and Stoutenburg 8/13/84 Meeting in office with Jack Thoemke and Chief Hickerson; draft complaint on Hinton • 8/13/84 Telephone conference with attorney Riach regarding Kim Olson representation 8/14/84 Telephone conference with SAPD regarding dismissal on Berthiaume 8/14/84 Telephone conference with Jack Thoemke and conference with Andrew Cyryt regarding criminal matter; telephone conference with Jack Thoemke 8/17/84 Meeting in office with Jack Thoemke regarding two complaints; draft complaints 8/20/84 Draft complaint on Neveu 8/21/84 Review complaints 8/21/84 Order initial St. Anthony calendar from Hennepin County Municipal Court 8/22/84 Telephone conference with Engstrom regarding letter on Cyryt; letter to Engstrom 8/22/84 Review complaints 8/22/84 Order 12 sets of reports, etc. , from SAPD • 8/22/84 Letter to Attorney Steigauf regarding, David Campbell 8/24/84 Telephone conference with Mitchell Swaden regarding Marty Wolf • 8/27/84 Received various police reports from SAPD; open various - new files; letter to officers notifying of Court trials; letter to Attorney Mayrand enclosing police reports on Forsythe; go through August calendar and close files; update files for September; prepare Rule 7.01 ' Notices on various files to opposing counsel and notify officers and breathalyzer operators of 'jury trials, comprising 15 letters 8/27/84 Telephone conference with Dave Johnston regarding rescheduling Scotka jury trial; memo to file 8/28/84 -Draft 8 complaints 8/29/84 Telephone conference with SAPD to order numerous reports; telephone conference with Attorney Iliff regarding Lines; letter to Attorney Iliff 8/30/84 Telephone conference with Ray Nelson 8/31/84 Telephone conferences (3) with Giancola; telephone con- ference with St. Anthony Police (2) regarding Beberg 8/31/84 Appear in Court for Beberg plea before Judge Farrell • 8/31/84 Telephone conference with Giancola' s office regarding Beberg 8/31/84 Telephone conference from Giancola regarding Beberg trial; telephone conference with officers; telephone conference with SAPD regarding Lines' trial 9/3/84 Letter to Watson regarding Jerald Ring 9/3/84 Review complaints on Hazelton, McBee, Hertog, Leingang, Thies, Roesler and Helland 9/4/84 Telephone conference with McGee regarding Scotka; telephone conference with Vellaume regarding Worwa 9/4/85 Review final calendar; order reports from SAPD; prepare new files; assemble folder for St. Anthony prosecutions 9/5/84 Letter to Luther regarding Worwa Jury Trial with enclosed subpoena; telephone conference with court reporter; telephone conference with SAPD; telephone con- ference with Luther; telephone conference with court reporter 9/5/84 Prepare for and attend Arraignments, Pre-Trials and • Court Trials for the City of St. Anthony at the Hennepin County Municipal Court -2- CITY OF ST. ANTHONY • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 18, 1984 .4 1 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Zawislak at 7:33 P.M. ` 2 3 Present for roll call : Jones, Franzese, Zawislak, Wagner, and Hansen. 4 ` 5 Absent: Bowerman and Bjorklund. 6 7 Also present: David Childs, City Manager. 8 9 Motion by Commissioner Hansen and seconded by Commissioner Wagner to approve the 10 minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held August 21 , 1984, with the amend- 11 ments and corrections suggested by the Secretary in her September 12th memorandum 12 to the Commissionmembers. - 13 14 Motion carried unanimously. 15 16 Commissioner Hansen will report the Commission recommendations to the Council at '-' 17 their next meeting, September 25th. 18 • 19 At 7:35 P.M. , the Chair opened the public hearing to consider a petition from 20 Stanton E. Fabel for a .variance which would permit him to construct a 10 X 30 21 foot addition to the existing garage at 2509 - 29th Avenue N.E. , to within six 22 feet, three inches, of his east property line, where eight feet, three inches would 23 be necessary- to meet the total 15 foot sideyard requirement of the City Ordinance. 24 25 Chairman Zawislak read the notice of the hearing which had gone out to all property -4 26 owners of record within 200 feet of the subject property and which had been 27 published in the Bulletin September 5, 1984. No one present reported failure to 28 receive the notice or objected to its content. .� 29 t'. 30 Mr. Fabel discussed the plans enclosed with his application for constructing a 31 second stall to his existing garage in conformance with the original design for x 32 the home. He said he needs a two car garage now that the family vehicles have 33 increased, making it necessary to constantly shuffle cars on the driveway. The 34 applicant told the Commissioners he would be adding to the 16 foot concrete 35 driveway in front of the garage and would be reroofing his existing home and gar- 36 age so the addition wouldn 't have an "added-on appearance. These improvements - — 37 should enhance, rather than detract from, the appearance of his property, Mr. 38 Fabel said. The addition would also permit him to extend the screened-in area 39 on the back of his home. 40 41 Tom Shaffer, 2513-29th Avenue N.E. , Mr. Fabel 's neighbor to the east, was present 42 to indicate to the Commission that he was very much in favor of the project. He fi� 43 said the lot lines between the two properties were very deceptive because, "Stan 44 mows on my lawn and I own his roses". Mr. Fabel estimated the distance between • 45 Shaffer's home and his property line to be between seven and eleven feet, with 46 eleven the most likely. Mr. Shaffer said he had his own property surveyed and Y` 47 provided for a two car garage when he built his home because his neighbor to the -2- 1 east had .indicated opposition to his getting a variance for that purpose. However, 2 the homeowner said, the economic conditions did not warrant adding another stall 3 at this time. 4 5 Mr. Childs reiterated the explanation of the proposal as stated -in his September 6 12th memorandum and reported receiving no calls pertaining to the variance request 7 since that time. No one present raised any further questions or objected to the 8 request and the hearing was closed at 7:44 P.M. 9 10 Motion by Commissioner. Jones and seconded by Commissioner Wagner to recommend the 11 Council grant Stanton E.. Fabel a two foot variance to the City Ordinance require- 12 ment for 15 foot sideyard setbacks for single family residential property which 13 would allow Mr. Fabel to construct the one stall addition he proposes to the 14- existing garage at 2509 - 29th Avenue N.E. , finding that: 15 16 1 . There was no opposition from the neighbors and, in fact, the neighbor to the 17 east who would be the most affected by the variance,- was present at the hearing 18 to indicate his approval of the project; 19 20 2. The improvements proposed by the applicant would enhance the appearance of the 21 property and the extension of the screened porch to the rear would increase 22 Mr. Fabel 's ability to use his backyard in the summer; 23 24 3. St. Anthony is a two car garage community and it was perceived by the Commission 25 that it would be a hardship,. not just an inconvenience, for a family with more 26 than one vehicle to have only a one-stall garage; • 27 28 4. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon the desire 29 of the owner to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land; 30 and 31 32 5. The perceived hardship could be considered to have been caused by the City 33 Ordinance and not by persons having an interest in the parcel of land. 34 35 Motion carried unanimously. 36 37 Mr. Fabel indicated he was anxious to get started on construction before the winter 38 set in. He was told the final decision had to be made by the Council the following 39 week, and if that decision turns out to be affirmative, he could apply for a 40 building permit the following morning. 41 42 At 7:50 P.M. , the public hearing was opened to consider the petition from Arthur 43 R. Peele, 492 Rolls Roadway, New Brighton, for an interpretation of .the zoning 44 ordinance or a variance to allow construction .of a 31 X 82 foot house (including 45 garage) on the existing 66 X 140 foot corner lot at 2621 - 32nd Avenue N.E . 46 47 The notice of the hearing which had been published in the September 5th Bulletin 48 and was to have been mailed to adjacent property owners of record within 200 4.9 feet •of. the subject property, was read by the- Chairman. The Manager reported 50 Commissioner Hansen, who lives to the south of'the Peele property, had indicated 51 failure to receive the notice, but he had researched the City Code of Ordinances • 52 and found "failure to receive the notice would not nullify the hearing". 53 54 In his, September 12th memorandum to the Commissioners, : Mr. Childs had reported 55 staff had recommended that the Commission accept the interpretation of the front J -3- • 1 yard as the narrow side-.of a corner lot for setback purposes. for this proposal and, . 2 perhaps, make a permanent recommendation to that effect which could be applied 3 ' when the Johnson and Hertog properties in that same area are considered for 4 residential development. 5 6 Commissioner Franzese wondered if that interpretation were made, whether the 7 hearing had to be held at all . The response was that since it had been published 8 and neighbors had been notified, the hearing should proceed. The recollection was 9. also that the Council had indicated a preference for considering such action on 10 a case-by-case basis. The Manager .confirmed for Commissioner Jones that no 11 variance would be necessary if the Peele home were built to face Belden. Drive, 12 which would create a buildable and usable lot as Mr. Childs had indicated on:- the 13 sketches he had included in the. agenda packet. 14 15 He had no plans with him, but Dr. Peele indicated he perceived it would not be 16 feasible for the home he and his wife plan to build on the lot and live in, to 17 have the front door facing 32nd Avenue. He said it had been somewhat of an 18 economic sacrifice for them to tear down the building which they had rented out for 19 a great number of years which had been damaged, but not demolished, in the storm, a 20 especially since they received very little compensation from the insurance for 21 tearing it down. The applicant indicated he perceived the removal of the "eyesore" 22 which had caused so many problems for the neighbors and the police, should be 23 considered a service to the community. 24 ={ 25 Dr. Peele indicated he perceived no problem for his neighbor to the north of him • 26 since only their garages would be adjacent-to each other. He said the structure 27 he proposes to build would be in alignment with the Beberg 's house, and although 28 it might not be as' far back as the two homes being constructed further north on 29 that street, his home would be set back much- further than the Brown home at the 30 end of the street. Mr. Childs guessed the two new homes might be set back further 1 31 than the City Ordinance requires and indicated he views this request to be very 32 similar to those approved for the house on 34th and Edward and for the Flaherty 33 home on 32nd and Rankin Road. } 34 35 Dr. Peele indicated he perceived the home's appearance would be more aesthetically 36 pleasing if it faced Belden Drive, which should cause no problems for the property 37 owners to the rear since only their back yards would be facing each other. He { 36 saw the home he was proposing as enhancing that corner, in contrast to, "the dog 39 I tore down". 40 41 Frank Budnicki , 3124 Wilson Street N.E. , said he lived two lots down and across the 42 street from the Peele property and indicated he was opposed to letting Dr. Peele 43 build a house which he compared to a "long shed" which would be "twice the size of 44 my house and on a smaller lot". Mr. Budnicki indicated he couldn 't understand 45 why the City kept changing the rules about setbacks and said he perceived lots 46 in the City were getting smaller and smaller; lot lines shorter and shorter; and 47 homes being built much closer together, than when he had built. The opponent 48 indicated his 'own lot was 11 ,000 square feet with "a littl.e variation" and had a 49 much smaller house built on it. He was concerned that the -Peele home would not 50 be comparable to the $100,000 homes he sees being built just north of the Peele 51 _ properties on lots which were wiped out by the April 26th tornado. • 52 . 53 Commissioner Jones asked Mr. Budnicki if it would change the character of the house 54 for him if Dr.. .Peele put his front door facing 32nd Street and told him all the 55 applicant is asking of the City is permission to turn his house around to face out ��r -4- 1 on Belden Drive. When Mr. Budnicki indicated that was not what he. was objecting • 2 to, the Commissioner told him Mr. Brown 's home on. the other end of that street 3 had been permitted to be. built 15 feet from the curb line, and since the. state 4 ordinance says "your front yard setback must average what your neighbors are, " 5 the Commission could recommend such a variance should be .granted to Dr. Peele 6 with which he could build the home he is now proposing. 7 8 As far as the value of the house goes, Commissioner Jones said he is certain it 9 would be worth more than what was there before the storm, and added that it is not 10 the responsibility of the City to dictate the worth of the home-which is being 11 built on that property. The Commissioner told Mr. Budnicki he had every right 12 to develop his own 160 foot lot all the way back to the required setback -lines. i 13 14 Mr. Budnicki indicated he would like to know how the neighbor just west of the 15 Peele property felt about the proposal . Joseph Tretter, 2617 - 32nd Avenue N.E. , 16 responded by saying he had been confused by the notice and had come to the meeting 17 to find out just exactly what was involved in the Peele request. Mr. Tretter 18 said he didn't care where the Peele's put their front door. His own home is about 19 15 feet from the lot line and Dr. Peele indicated a good portion of the back of 20 his proposed home would probably face Mr. Tretter's back yard and the distance 21 between the two homes would be increased even more if he utilized only 28 of the 22 31 feet the Manager had said were available for a house on the narrow side of the 23 lot: There was also a possibility the house would only be built 82 feet wide, 24 including the garage. 25 26 Mr. Budnicki indicated he was happy to learn the Peele 's would be living in the • 27 new home but said he wouldn 't want to see a double house built on the lot. He 28 was told the zoning would not permit that. 29 30 When the two started exchanging remarks about the size of their respective homes, 31 the Chairman closed the hearing at 8:22 P.M. i 32 33 Commissioner Hansen questioned Dr. Peele about whether or not he intended to 34 retain the existing curb cut on 32nd. Dr. Peele indicated he would have no use 35 for a driveway in that location and the Manager said that it would be the home- 36 owner's expense to have the curb cut closer. 37 38 Motion by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Hansen to recommend the 39 Council interpret the lot frontage on 32nd Avenue N.E., be considered the .front 40 yard for setback purposes for the property at 2621 - 32nd Avenue N.E. and that the 41 structure to be built there by Arthur R. Peele be permitted to face towards Belden 42 Drive, finding that: 43 44 1 . Arthur Peele has indicated he intends to build . a home without variances in 45 that location; 46 47 2. Because the subject property is a substandard lot, it is necessary for him to 48 face the house towards Belden Drive; 49 50 3. The owner of the lot directly west of the subject property, Joseph Tretter, 51 2617 - 32nd Avenue N.E. , was present for the hearing and indicated he would • 52 have no objections to facing the house in that direction; and 53 54 4. Removal of the decrepit old house which previously stood on that corner, could 55 . do nothing less than enhance the appearance of. that corner and.the neighborhood 56 itself. 1 -5- • 1 Motion carried unanimously. 2 3 Mr. Budnicki. persisted in his belief that .the proposed structure "would be .too .long 4 for -that small -lot", and indicated he was convinced the Commission would see he 5 was right after it is constructed. 6 7 Under the "Unfinished Business" classification in the agenda, Mr. Childs had advised 8 that Robbie Nelson, whose request for a variance had been tabled August 21st, . 9 would be constructing his addition in such a manner as to not require a variance . 10 11 Mike Anderson, 1809 South Plymouth Road, Minnetonka, was present to request concept 12 approval for his plans for rebuilding for sale of the storm damaged property at i 13 2608 - 33rd Avenue N.E. , which he had purchased from his father's aunt, Ila Clark, I 14 who could not bear to return to her home now that all her dearest belongings were 15 gone. He said he had completely removed the damaged structure and dug out the 16 basement where there had been water problems in the past and now planned to 17 construct on the 47 X 156 foot lot a 34 foot wide structure for which he would 18 need a two foot variance to the City Ordinance requirement for 15 foot sideyard 19 setbacks. 20 21 The plans, which were included in the Commission agenda, were the same ones as 22 used for the Robert Rivard home at 3224 Roosevelt Street N.E. , which had been 23 recommended by Mr. Hamer. However, since the Rivard home was built on a 51 foot 24 lot, Mr: Anderson indicated he doubted very much weather the City would be will - 25 ing to give him a four foot variance and said he would be adjusting the plans so _ 26 only a two foot variance would be necessary. The modifications. would be made in 27 the length of the home since there is plenty of room to the rear, Mr. Anderson said. 28 29 The applicant indicated he had lived in the northeast metropolitan area most of 30 his life and had three relatives, including a sister who lives on Edward, within I 31 10 blocks of the Clark home. The man who lived next to this property was a friend i 32 of his grandfather and Mr. Anderson said that he had indicated a great interest in 33 seeing him develop the property but had died two weeks previously. 34 35 There was an indepth discussion of the relation of the subject property and the 36 Hertog property, which Mr. Childs is certain would be replatted for residential 37 development some time in the near future, for which the Manager anticipates the 38 property owners would be seeking a similar treatment on the corner lots as had 39 been requested for the Peele property that evening. Ii 40 41 Mr. Anderson indicated he agreed that it would be ideal to have his property j 42 incorporated into the Hertog and Johnson developments as suggested by Commissioner 43 Jones, but since the Manager had indicated it could be some time before the 44 insurance settlement is made and the .lot split for such a development realized, 45 the new property owner indicated he could not delay his own project that long. 46 He said he still hoped to get into the ground as soon as the City procedures would 47 permit and to have the home sold by Christmas. 48 49 Mr. Anderson said .he had found out the lot owned by the Hertogs east of his own 50 was 42 feet wide. and he. estimated the old structure, which was once used as -a 51 schoolhouse, to be -.at -least 10 feet from his property line. The applicant • 52 indicated he perceived he had a similar situation to the Peele's where it would be 53 hardship to build an attractive home in such a limited space without ending up 54 with a "shed appearance which had concerned Mr. Budnicki . Mr. Anderson also 55 contended the home he planned to build on the lot would not appreciably increase 56 the value of the parcel beyond what was there before the storm. -6- 1 The.Commission members were polled for their reaction to the proposal .. • 2 3 . Commissioner Jones indicated he would have-.no objections to building the proposed 4 home on that 47 foot lot but wondered if there would be an advantage for Mr. 5 Anderson to at least talk to the Hertogs about their plans for developing the 6 adjacent- property to see if he couldn 't work out a different configuration. which 7 could be beneficial to both parties since the Commissioner does not foresee the 8 - City permitting the redevelopment of the florist property into 47 foot lots 9 facing Edward Street N.E. He told Mr. Anderson it would be to his own advantage 10 to return to the public hearing on the request with written indications of 11 neighbor approval of his plans. 12 13 Commissioner' Hansen responded to this by saying he agreed with Commissioner Jones ' 14 desire to have this property fit into the Hertog development, but perceived, 15 since that would not be possible for at least a year, the Commission would have 16 to consider this proposal independently since Mr. Anderson had indicated he 17 wanted to start construction as soon as he could. The Commissioner indicated 18 that, barring any serious opposition from the neighbors, he would be voting for 19 a recommendation of approval for this project since he personally is very happy 20 to see the lots .in that area, none of which are an ideal size, developed for 21 attractive homes. 2-2 -- — — — — — --� 2 3 Commissioner Franzese indicated she could recommend approval of this proposal -- 24 since a 34 foot wide house would probably be fitted more attractively on this 25 lot which the Manager had indicated was 7,300 square feet and larger than the 26 Mike Pribula lot at 3231 Roosevelt, for which a variance was recently given. 27 28 The Chair indicated he also would have preferred to have an arrangement whereby 29 the Hertog property could have been considered with this--proposal , but conceded 30 there just wasn 't time for that to be worked out . He offered no objections to the 31 proposal before him. 32 33 Commissioner Wagner indicated the Anderson proposal looked good to him and said 34 he would have no objections if none were raised by the neighbors. 35 36 Mr. Childs reported the actions taken by the City in an attempt to get the storm 37 damaged property like the Johnson 's and the Hertog's cleaned up. Commissioner 38 Hansen said he saw bulldozers working on the Johnson property that day. 39 40 There was a brief discussion of Arkell ' s financing problems with the condominium 41 project with several Commission members indicating their concern that some of the 42 buyers might withdraw from their purchase agreements if start of construction is 43 delayed too long. 44 45 Commissioner Hansen promised to report back on the vote scheduled the next evening 46 by St. Anthony Legion members on whether the local post was interested in joining 47 with the New Brighton Legionnaires to purchase the former Super Valu building on 4-8 Old Highway 8 for clubrooms. If the City group decides to make the move, the 49 St. Anthony building would be sold. Mr. Childs said it would be difficult for 50 that property to be considered along with the condominium development at this 51 late date. • 52 53 Commissioner Hansen requested support of the Commission.:members for the St. i 54 Anthony Biennial Ball which is scheduled to be held in Apache in April . This led 55 to a short update on the reconstruction of the center by staff. 1 -7- • 1 Motion by Commissioner.-Wagne.r. .and seconded by Commissioner Hansen to adjourn. the 2 meeting at 9:05 P.M. 3 . 4 Motion carried unanimously. 5 6 7 P 8 Respectfully submitted, 9 10 Helen Crowe, Secretary 11 12 13 ! 14 15 16 j 17 I 18 19 20 s 21 22 i 23 24 i 2.5 26 •27 6 28 29 30 31 ! 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 _ 4 3 - 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 •52 53 54 55 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution Reports-1a September 19, 1984 Ordinance Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Variance Request- ' Other Stan Fabel , - 29th September 25, 1984 Avenue N.E. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Mr. Stan Fabel , 2509 - 29th Avenue N.E. , pro- poses a 10' X 30' addition to his existing garage. His proposed setbacks would be 6'9" to the west property line and 6' 3" to the east (currently 16'9' ) . Thus, he would be 2' short of the required 15' . FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES : Approve, modify or deny . No objections were heard from any neighbors The directly affected next door neighbor was present and spoke in favor of the variance. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission unanimously approved the requests with conditions and findings as shown in their minutes . CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS : o J o e �,� Fee : R- . . . . . . . $15 . 00 Other. . . . . . . $25 .00) CITY OF ST . ANTHONY PETITION''FOR VARIANCE wc��h 3�{C ' n�yZ A licant PP : Teti h.`N G". P-4 Q ,�//� Phone : ��/ •`ifs! `.. Address : Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter , agent , etc. ) : Legal description of property petitioned for variance : Zr- r 0/e, e�lncti COQ j Street address : . CY?fC ; ,�y zi 4cC_ Zoning district in which property is located : Request: /�.� „tip Tom, sa rr �r,_%� t;-� n-��%_ L�oH�� /hv� TG Minnesota Statutes and City ordinances require that the following condi- tions must be satisfied affirmatively. If the answer to a statement is Yes , please explain , using additional sheets .' Yes No 1 . Because of the particular physical surroundings , shape , or topographical conditions of the parcel of land involved, the proposed variance would re- lieve an undue hardship , as distinguished from a mere inconvenience should the applicable ordin- ance be strictly enforced . 2 . The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property- in the vicinity or zoning district . ✓ 3 . The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by City ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land. Pursuant to Section 15 , Subd. 5 , of the City of St.' Anthony Zoning Ordin- ance, a variance shall not be granted for any use not permitted in the zone in which a particular parcel lies . Si4nature of Applicant 1)59,19 AU 23 108 15.00cx ignature of wner .o er than applicant) CITY OF ST. ANTHONY NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION FOR VARIANCE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing -by the Planning Commission of the City of St. Anthony on Tuesday,- September 18, 1984 , at 7 : 35 P.M. , in the Council Chambers of the City Hall , 3301 Silver Lake Road (enter northeast corner) for the purpose: --- Consideration of a petition from Stanton E. Fabel for a variance t llow'construction-of--an- addition to the _ existing -ga-rage-at -250-9= —29th_Avenue N.E.- to within 6 ' 3" of the east property line ( 813" required) . The proposed addition consists of a second stall for the existing garage . Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter shall be heard at said time and place . Questions regarding this matter may be directed to the Citv Manager , 789-8881 . David M. Childs City Manager Publish : September 5 , 1984 f - . ---- - - - � -=- --°. -- - i -- - --- - -. _ ---'� ).� �ir I _- �.I - ._ -- .- - t' --�I-•�li_ .I{_ -_ I-- 'I __I' .__Ii _�I' �. __ - • -- - - --�I �• -----; _ •• )!i I t�i + I' �, I --1L +! _ll-�II �I -il--�•I I �- - ----- jr r i c� �J .I IN r Lei u �_ti, .'c�_s. ,.�.I_l, r .._ .._-ilifi:9a.is✓:�_ .._..�_,..�.....-1.• '��.__.. ...._ _ _ •r.W10S..._ .,-. - ._ .- __ _ — — r �}----i j 1 1. �l J It —I_L/? 7 ix I _ -..-s � /�...1•�._`._ itr,Cl:OLfaM ,Jr_:/1 n'1 T.. �iJNI�•K1�- N Ao Jr- � J .a i i f `L1 i - J4&; -5.. -5.. v� �'ti`� /--J %�••�J _/ 1 �- _- --- �r�-h�---- ---- I �.no t'o ■ If CITY OF 'ST. ANTHONY REQUES'7 FOR 'CITY COUNCIL ACTION • ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Date Submitted Type .of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution Reports-lb September 19, 1984 Ordinance Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Ordinance Inter- Other pretation, Arthur Peele, September 25, 1984 2621-32nd Avenue N.E. ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM• David M. Childs, City Manager ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Dr. Arthur Peele proposes to construct a 31 ' X ouse with garage on the lot at 2621-32nd Avenue N. E. The front door would face Belden and therefore an interpretation is needed to consider the 32nd Avenue side (short side) as the front yard for setback purposes. FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES : Approve, modify or deny. One neighbor spoke in opposition, but h i s on yconcern was that a 31 ' X 82' house is too big. The next door neighbor to the west was present and did not object . RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the front yard for setback purposes be the 32nd Avenue side. Thus, no variance is needed. See Planning Commission minutes for findings . • CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS: t - ... u a c e Fee : R-1 . . . . . . . . . 15 . 00 Other . . . . . . . $25 . 00 ) CITY OF ST . ANTHONY i PETITION FOR VARIANCE ' Applicant: Phone : Address : LL d, E v, ,f e 5.41 Nl�-j _�T//L Status of applicant (.owner, buyer, renter, agent , etc. ) : WAAC)C_ Legal description of property petitioned for variance : r•S`f, Cj ' Pn2e-r L L . s,s�. tee-ske e-Lqv d Suzev IUn, VO a Street address : 2 all - 3',_-�,uJ Xo_ AL L`, Zoning district in which property is located : -� Request: /6- Foot A!z+�_ 6 ALL W C112 Ludf oFgtld<&j bcloo _ ;3 N c 3--...d fivL, N To �l�n,.', 7` ��FC soy F ?Mowing ,. Minnesota Statutes and City ordinances require that the following condi- J Lions must be satisfied affirmatively. If the answer to a statement is Yes , please explain , using additional sheets . Yes No 1 . Because of the particular physical surroundings , shape , or topographical conditions of the parcel of land involved, the proposed variance would re- lieve an undue hardship , as distinguished from a mere inconvenience should the applicable ordin- ance be strictly enforced . V 2 . The purpose of the proposes: variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land , but would correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property ;i in the vicinity or zoning district. 3 . The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by F City ordinance and has not been created by any 4 persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land. a Pursuant to Section 15 , Subd. 5 , of the, City of St. Anthony Zoning Ordin- ance, . a variance shall not be granted for any use not permitted in the zone in which a particular parcel lies . r �- J. _C� M • Signature of Applicant ,y s rs t, _ M6013 AU 29 Signature o Owner other 8 0 A 1 5.00CK . than applicant) CITY OF ST. ANTHONY NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION FOR VARIANCE TO .WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing by the Planning Commission of the City of St. Anthony on Tuesday, September 18, 1984 , at 7 : 35 P.M. , in the Council Chambers of the City Hall , 3301 Silver Lake Road (enter northeast corner) for the purpose: Consideration of a petition from Stanton E. Fabel for a variance to allow construction of an addition to the existing garage at 2509 - 29th Avenue N.E. to within 6 ' 3" of the east property line ( 8 ' 3" required) . The proposed addition consists of a second stall for the existing garage . Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter • shall be heard at said time and place . Questions regarding this matter may be directed to the City Manager, 789-8881 . David M. Childs City Manager i } Publish : September 5 , 1984. II I • �'.,`M zV- �M4 4 C. Comer 16A- is Iv 4e* 6e� 4qr.. V)a.TYaO ife �w aCeA 'S b.Ai Wet to • + 5 )9 ti km + r f P 4 LA MC j z t: r� c X tc 2 I 32lfR Ave-- 1 s; cage / u tit : • � i 32 -- AvfL 3fNv - es i n ;a I5 VO 1 J n 4 l i :l • 'J • 3� 1 S1 V3VV Cr3C S IV-1.I m 3 (?-L 53 SQdoD3 3n a36 � w�S f W CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION • -----------------------7---------------------------------------------- Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution Reports-3a September 12, 1984 Ordinance Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Fire Department Other Monthly Report September 25, 1984 Informational August , 1984 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: Lee Entner, Fire Chief ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: MEDICALS Lacerations/bleeding 5 Difficulty breathing 2 Stroke 2 Heart 2 Diabetic 1 Drug Reaction 1 • Fracture 1 Fall with injuries 1 DOA 1 FIRES Automobile 2 Mutual aid 2 Dumpster 1 Fire alarm 1 Kitchen ($3,000 loss) I SUMMARY Fires Total time, 4 hours 58 minutes Medicals Total time, 7 hours 9 minutes Special Duties Total time , 40 hours 30 minutes Inspections Total time, 6 hours 40 minutes RECOMMENDATION: CITY MANAG R"S REVIEW: COMMENTS : ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPART11ENT M014THLY REPORT COMPANY g/- S'-�2 - !b �UC�(�ST/985 N DATE TIME LOCATION LOSS REMARKS AT FIRST SPECIAL, C011PANY FIRES AID DUTY IA'SPT. HRS MIN HRS HIN HRS MIN HRS IN 3 8-/ 6750 Go' - .E I/l S 30 7- T co 075° 3y0-0 S-K cr'v t=j ✓1'1 c d 'ca - f- , �1�� e �3 7 7� 7 R7 2 30 7 �v iO3) iq $3 -Dora a y g'8 o s C o0 s - ,, qo 0C/� 8-is 1336 S c c 60 8 6 / 3a .. .,.- ----- --._ .. _._ .- --•-°-.,____:--- ....._ . .. _ ....._. -- - ..._ _. ... ... , ry 9r-t- a yv-a rrrrra�-rs- .. ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPART11214T M014TIlLY REPORT COMPANY 90 _J�U(�cl s l /98K ;N DATE TIMP LOCATION LOSS REMARKS AT FIRST SPECIAL COMPANY FIRES AID DUTY INSPT. HRS IMIN HRS HIN HRS MIN HRS IN o 52-/ 10 - - 1 8- I Z 1 951 ApAcH c PLAZA u P S F 2 E ZOO F-r3 /`Y./o F7g7- Tr'i-c C9b/ f vo �-1�' Ion Kct�ue,-Tcp-f-. -Zc-oo I, P D Nlo-�rj&\fK- o ,i 5-H 133c> NTy 4mL 5ytvv5 _ fwmk 5 13a 846- I I S u-cy NAL4- - - a 2 F� - ems s l 30 4 /7 G - Gu 8- O C. L au° TG o G- L- zf-S 1,604A /D 13 SS AvD i. 8- zi 113 Gtr (�xu. mAV4- moo �wnON W^y c=*-mP Pmt W.i V Z co �3. g-zi (GAS sY�r�cr1 � ► m - — Cb�s � � �� ro r� S z3 i 13L Gay ► ,�. ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPAF.TII IJT � M014TIlLY REPORT COMPANY (0080-8l 8Z—�)p qU bum 1goo f N. DATE TIME LOCATION LOSS REMARKS AT FIRST SPECIAL COMPANY FIRES AID DUTY INSPT. HRS MIN HRS MIN HRS MIN HRS MIN I Z ZZ.OL- ZBoy- �1`'� �6 WE S^ 0- ,v 130/ 7 CQrts*vltw In E1) e-AL - 5-a- 1-E Z� -305,S Lb �l-1 'O Cl c /an d - c.,/ G C7 7 I 014 o f OD SA N L M z.d; - N Y H-,, �I -� /y,Iry �,-�� .►S G 3 O z: S 30 I c7p P P o oN t�i6Z, .. ., r ... _ �' •,. 4'".°wT.!'.W(•'� -. S'.Rr!SMsr.:i9 ham..-.r..r-.:i'1-., ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPAP.TIILIJT C, I �y���1_���_��,� MOIJTH P.LY REPOT 'COMPANY to N DATE TL�lE LOCATION LOSS REMARKS AT : FIRST SPECIAL COHtPANY FIRES AID DUTY INSPT. HRS MIN HRS BIN HRS MIN HRS MIN -{. `� �•`��-10 H00. Z!5 '541,.\f CP—Li0" , Zc�> iMCrlylcM. — ��lCepirv� �S -31 0-702 Zvi -Z9"Avt nff- 7 V-31 OV 7 moo/ 14TS v I ,�( / 0g 8 31 19 30 9- 5 Sr,1 d-6 k a l '� 9-3/ 3"133 / s- co// T3 Anu2 u / /V U 1 -99'05l eE'66S422 0 8£'865'LE GE'08046 C00'SI IVILd -? 00' 00'SZL 0 OC'SZL OC'SLT C 11W23d bYVIV CCO-OOZZ£-TOT 00' 00'69L 0 00.69L cc' C hOI1Vb1SI932 9NISf1UH-I1If1W CCO-C61Z£-101 00' 00'50[ 0 00'SOT OUST 0 A3NVcfl330 GCO-0812%-101 00' 00'5 0 c0'S 0c' C 1INI13d 3b1d CCO-CLIZE-101 00' 00'001 0 CC'OOT OC' C 3SP IVNCIIIChL3 GCO-0912£-[OI 00' 00' 0 GO' OC' C NL11VAt_1-� CCC-CSiZE-I01 00' 00.OZT 0 CO.OZi OUSE C SV9 CCO-Ot[2E-101 00' 88'OLT'£ 0 88'OLT'£ E9'£601 C S1IWb3c 9NI193H CCO-CETZE-101 00' OS'E68 0 OS'E69 SZ'ZSZ C SIllb3d 9N MF r..Id CCO-uZI2E-[OT 00' 00.569'TE 0 00'969'IE 06'6096c_ C S116b3d 9hlCllf'd GCC-ClI2£-lul 06'66 -00'S86'bl U CO'SI GC' CUC'Sl =CVL9 CCG-Colic-101 S1IMb3c -01'SE 00'ZIZ'#0 0 00'21Z'91 -GE'ZIZ c00'ZT S3Sh3311 V161 1 00' 00'O£Z'b 0 00'OEZ'#0 OC'CZ1 C 3SN3311 SbUIOV21hL3 COG-CLZIE-101 00' 00'00£ 0 00'00E CC' c Ef10 CCC-09clt-[Ol 00' 00'009 0 00'009 cc' C _h1M LGO-CSZ U-IJI 00' 00'082 0 00'09Z cc, 0 Sh10h-A CLO-L§ZIL-IUl 00' 00'508 0 00'508 OC' C NO11V1S 3.IAb3S 3h]IGSV9 CCO-u£Z1£-101 00' 00'00%'5 0 c0'COE'S OC' C S33IA3C 1h3h3Sf1WV-11VChld COC-UIZlc-I0[ 1 00' 00'001 0 00'OOI OC' C KGE 3N(If' LCC-CCLIE-l0[ 00' 00'00#0 0 O0'00#0 cc' C 9N11331163 hSlbl 3 3=VEaV9 Gc0-C61IL-101 00' 00'009 0 c0'C09 cc* O A311V 5NOPL9 CCO-Cb[1£-101 c0' 00'Ltl 0 CC'Lbl OC' C h3h:jd CCG-CLIU-101 00' 00'OOZ 0 00.002 00' C E9hld LCL-C9lli-lul 00' 00' 0 QO' OC' C UbIlbVIS 3131HjA bC1L14 CLO-OSIU-101 00' 00.55§ 0 00'554 -9E1 LbE C 9h11V311 cro-0§ilC-101 00' 00'OLZ 0 00'CLZ 00'51 C SLU GLO-u£ilf-101 00' 00'OSL 0 00'OSL cc* G 31122V913 GCO-CZIIE-lul IV S9 -00.522'0[ 0 CO'SLL'I OC' COO'ZI b:-:;E 2'E EIVS 3jL 7 SL CCC-CLIIE-101 S3Sh3311 96'ZS -ZI'ZZ9'96£ 0 E9'LL£4Ebc W OES'EZ C00'CEL 53x01 1%161 00' 00' 0 00' OC' O AAzl XV1 cI1102 IV1IcV3 GCO-C§IGC-10l 00' 00' 0 00' 0c' C AA21 VaH LCG-u£ICE-lol -EI'S9 6Z'£SI'Z 0 62'ES966 OC' C05'Z 15 ONVI'jeci YVl'lh['llah_d GcC-Cl[Ct-101 OO' 00' 0 00' OC' C S=33 lVCjl C2E-0llcc-IOT §b'ES -Ib'SLL'9EE 0 65'§lL'SEE W OES'E2 Cu5'LZL 213 OVn1S3lEF 9 S=XV1 cC2c CLG-Ullc£-lol Sjxvi 1 v#ttv#s##vtttttt#ttv#tvtvvvtttivttvtr+lrttt#vts#vrtt•!t#t#tvv#tttt•+rs####svrtlr#rlt rot#t#vtv tvtr+r#rtttr#+trrr+#r+.o+rt++#+ttltrltt # 3CAA A3a ! CNllj 1Ob3h=0 v hIVW3b S 33NVIVS O3a38W(13N3 31V0-C1-bV3A H1hGW lh_2bf13 031390118 jtiPh WL23V 'Lh 1M,L33P r bE6I it 15(l!)flV 5 8 6 [ b V 3 A l V 3 S T 3 8 U 1 b G d 3 b I s 0 (1 u ` • A n C 1+ 1 r V � • • 1. a T ti J N Y •_. B U E T 2 E P 0 2 T > q. 0 R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31. 1934 t ACCIU%T 4:3. ACCJJVT VANE BUDGETED CURRcVT MONTH YEAR-TD-DATE ENCUMBERED 3ALANCE R REMAIN t _ iRbdiRifpPttf#PRPfbfttPiPiRibffft#fffiRP#tPfPtPiiiPP4PPRiiRf RORtpttP4PiRiiRQPl iPiftiPR►fiitPRd##iRRRfdidQR4p####POpif ROdiRiitRdkPPOP d SFNE2AL FUND 0 REVENUE i pidiibRPPAi fiQb#wRkRQtQ04RQQRtRRifiif RfQbPQidR4i#f i4piPQp Rf RddRRfPR4RibRf RRQRkpQ#Ri if PpO#i4iid#iipRiRRd#ptpRddiiidiiiiddd4PQiRif R4R4 � TNTFRGOVERVMENTAL REVENUE 101-33103-003 4414TER44CF-ST4TE AtO 9.000 .00 3.126.00 0 5.874.00- 65.27 101-33203-03D POLICE S�ECI4L 29,000 .00 .00 0 29,000.00- 100.00 101-333DD-ODD FIRE SPECIAL 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .03 101-33403-030 STATE AID TO L)CAL GOVERN 192.103 341184.49 72,276.49 0 119,823.52- 62.38 101-33503-000 ST OF 4I4N-973ILE HOME REGIS 0 00 24.49 0 24.49 .00 101-33600-030 ATTA=HED MACH AID 0 .DO .00 0 .00 .00 101-33700-003 HEVV CTY-TCE E SNOW REMVL 4.403 .00 6.400.00 0 2,000.00 45.45- 101-33900-000 RA4SEY COUNTY-SWEEPING 1.200 .00 949.61 0 250.39- 20.87 101-33900-030 ISD -.282 MISC SERVICES 5.000 .00 1,429.60 0 3,570.40- 71.41 TOTAL IVTERGOVERVNENTAL REVENU 240,70D 349184.49 84,206.18 0 1569493.82- 65.02 C1142SES FOR SERVICE i 101-35100-030 MU.VI:TPAL COURT FINES 65.00D' 4,917.45 26,700.12 0 38,299.89- 53.92 TOTAL C44RGES FOR SERVICE 659000 4.917.45 26.700.12 0 389299.88- 59.92 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 101-39103-DD3 14TEREST-INVEST4E4T EARNTVGS 40.003 .00 .OD 0 409000.00- 103.00 101-33200-ODO FTLIVS FEES 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 101-39300-050 VARIANCE PERMITS 0 11000 722.00 0 722.00 .00 101-394:03-OOH WHO =RADICATI3V 0 250.70 600.00 0 600.00 -00 101-39500-OOD SALE OF MAPS 3 2.50 62.00 0 62.00 .00 101-38600-000 Ca?TES 0 36.94 183.74 0 183.74 .00 101-38700-000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SEARCHES 0 95.00 331.00 0 331.00 .00 t 101-38910-DOD MTSCELLAVEOUS 40.003 1 ,940.55 15.378.83 0 24,621.17- 61.55 , TOTAL MTSCELLANEJUS REVENUE 800000 2.425.99 17.277.57 0 62.722.43- 78.40 RTNE,R SOURCES 101-39030-ODD OTHER SOURCES O 00 .00 0 .00 .00 101-39430-030 ST4T: SALES TA[ COLLECTED D .33 .00 0 .00 .00 101-39440-OD3 SURCHARGES (BUILDIVG PERMIT) 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 E 101-39830-000 LTDUOR FUND 396,000 259000.30 173,500.00 0 222,500.00- 56.19 101-39960-ODO SEWER FUVD D .30 .00 0 .00 .00 101-39873-OU0 WATER FUND 0 .30 .00 0 .00 -00 101-39880-030 REVENUE SHARTVS F WO 49,003 '.00 .00 0 48000.00- 10D.00 .3 101-39990-000 TRANSFERS 0 :00 .00 0 .00 .00 fir; \ 101.-39990-033 RESERVES 0 .DO .00 0 .00 .00 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES 444,000 259000.00 1739500.00 0 2709500.00- 60.92 lY TOTAL GENERAL FUVD 19586,700 77.926.49 6989872.13 0 8379827.87- 55.95 a L- L p' • • H a U D OT 4 R E T P H D•J R N T Y F O R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 4U�;UST 31. 1934 - ACCOUNT JJ. 4CCJJVT 46.4E BUDGETED CURR_11T .404TH YEAR-TO-DATE ENCUM9ERED 9ALANCE It REMAIN r. {b140141kd ta�tdttalitlltrll{b##rr4trkt{kpb4llitl44tr{{040d{{rill{ar►{r{8{lkr{{ir{4{b0ibba{44{l4#b{{p40444QQS{{4aa#Q#{abt{t#pQQ#QQ{#aQQ - a GENERAL FLIND { EXPENSES • MAYIR - CJUNCIL paaa{ta4#r4ak4aa4tl{{s{l{{t{lrrl{a{{s{{{p{{ap144a4{Ql#4a{{{{{{{4{rltalt{aalta{aai{4a4aa{aaar a{t{asa{4s{assasa{#a4asaaaa#a#aQa{4•#aQQ PERSO-44L SERVICES 101-40100-11'.1 SALARIES 12.50) 325.30 9.40D.00 0 4.200.00 33.33 101-401DO-112 SALARIES-TEH:�/o4RT TIME 2.250 .DO 1.611.67 0 638.33 23.37 101-40107-114 E14DL3YERS C04TR1B/PF4SI9N 0 56.39 56.39 0 56.39- .00 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 14.850 381.39 10.069.06 0 4.781.94 32.20 C014TR4:TUAL SFRVTCES 101-401D0-225 G=.4ER4L SUPPLIES 50 3500 40.5D 0 9.50 19.00 IF TOTAL C34TRACTUAL SERVICES 50 35.0D 40.50 0 9.50 19.00 SUPPLIES 101-4010:1-321 OTHER SERVICES 50 .DD 10.00 0 40.00 83.00 10)-40110-341 TRAVEL C74FERE4CE G SCHOOL 4.250 30.30 39887.12 0 362.88 3.54 101-40100-3i7 SU3SrRIPTI04S 5 4E.43ERSHTP 10D .00 66.25 0 33.75 33.75 TOTAL SUPPLIES 4.400 •30.00 3.963.37 0 436.63 9.92 I SUPPLIES �- 101-40100-570 T444SFERS TO OTHER FUNDS 0 .DO .03 0 .00 .00 r 101-40100-671 CONT14GE4CY FUND 15000 415.04 4.228.04 0 10071.96 71.81 = TOTAL SUPPLIES 15.003 415.04 4.228.04 0 10.771.96 71.81 TOTAL 4AY-1 - C3JNCIL 34.303 861.43 19.299.97 0 16.000.03 46.65 C �f P A r r i - . L t. --r- - _ �, - ---- ---- • • 4 11 T H 14 Y • F U 7 G t T R = P 12 T F O R F i S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 319 1934 ACCIUNT 43. AC---114T 444= RUOGETEr) CURB=VT M914FH YEAR-TD-DATE ENCUMBEREO BALANCE X REMAIN ti#Iikf#lllik4t###llitkiiif#l4t lttfiif#####it1##4#f#lit lf#fll#f#ti#liiiiflill►t#1 i4#ilfki��##tklfliiiifftft##fftfflifittiff#IiitiiRi i GFNE?AL F11140 i EXPFNSES i GEM=?AL MANAGEM=NT ftii►It#Idti#14di1#t#44 ll4#fP##1ifltliti#iifilt#If#tll l 0041###ff#f ilt#t#lilt i#tt4tif##iititifi#iifktitff#tiiifffif ilffit#iff#kfilf ift PERSONAL SERVICES 101-WDO-110 SALARIE=S REGJLAR 51.753 19035.23 32.950.38 0 18.789.62 35.31 101-402n0-114 FMPLIYERS CONT?TB/PENSTDN 6.145 419.72 39904.85 0 29240.15 36.45 101-49200-115 EMDLIYERS C74TRTB/1NSUR 3.550 586.22 29371.23 0 11178.72 33.20 TOTAL DERSINAL SERVICES 61.445 5.042.17 399236.51 0 229208.49 35.14 SUP°Li_S 101-40203-320 ClNSJLT14G/CI4TRACTEU SER 19203 .00 19110.00 0 90.OD 7.50 101-40200-321 IT4E2 SERVICES 25 .DO 2D.00 0 5.00 20.00 101-40?nO-341 TR4V_L CINFEREVCE G SCHOIL 2,750 65.00 19102.90 0 11647.10 59.89 101-402n0-372 SU3SCRIPTI04S S 4E43ERSH13 500 10.30 466.44 0 33.56 5.71 101-40200-319 4TSC EXPENSES - HRA 0 .DO .00 0 .00 .OD TOTAL SUPPLIES 4.475 75.00 21699.34 0 19775.66 33.68 TOTAL GENERAL 4A44GE4E4T 659920 5.117.17 41,935.95 0 231994.15 36.38 i I f l � 1 " � L L. • ,. A 4 T H O N T • 8 U 0 - E T R _ P D R T 0 R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 r AUGUST 31. 1984 ACCIUNT 40. ACCIJ4T VA.MF BUDGETED CURB=VT MONTH YEAR—TO—DATE ENCUMBERED 9ALANCE t REMAIN r - 44+4kk4+4!!l a+dda4l ffa+++k#+dtPfktttPtr04ttddtt4kfdidOktriatittdtP+faiPkt4t4tit►Pttdiktrii4af atttt+#•tot+####Ptk###00t4diiiPd#tta4tr++4k # GENERAL FUND a EXPENSES • ELE:TIONS � ' - t 4kt+44t4Ra+f###+l p4Rtttt+t#tftttrtpOtlti+kp#40i tkik0t#+444tti4dttt40#ttak44t44kk4ttt+4k00ak#+#P+ttttttitt4RttR4 ttkk44ttt464ptikf##44 PERSONAL SERVICES 101-40400-11? SALARIES - T=MD/PORT TIME 2.403 .00 .0D 0 2.400.00 103.00 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2.400 .00 .00 0 2,400.00 100.00 � CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101-40400-225 GE4=R4L SUPPLI=S 150 .3D 41.34 0 108.66 72.44 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150 .00 41.34 0 108.66 72.44 r. SUP�)LI=S 101-40400-334 PRINTING G PU3LISHT4G 350 .00 302.05 0 47.95 13.70 101-40400-337 MAI4T G REPAIRS - OTHER 400 .00 109.63 0 290.37 72.59 C TOTAL SUPPLIES 753 .00 411.68 0 338.32' 45.11 TOTAL _L_CTIONS 3.303 .DO 453.02 0 2,846.98 85.27 { r4 L " C • Y r R U D � e T 4 = P N O]R v T Y • - F D R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 r.. AUGUST 31. 1334 - 4CC_lU4T 4,3. AC:3'JIT 444E BUDGETED CURB=4T MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE ENCUMBEREO BALANCE Y REMAIN t R#Odd#Pdk!�OkdtttdkdPkkkdd4itk4dkd#ddR4ddRkP#4k44d44#d+44dP#dPi#tdkf iiP4iiiP4dkii4d4####Rd4kdddPP#iiPiddii+#Pd4ddd4P#i#Pi#4i604Pd4dd# + GENERAL FUND k EXPENSES R FINANCE/INSURANCE/ACCOUNTING • R4i#+4#Pdd dkk#itAkdkkkkkPd#t4dRPtdd4#R4d44#P#P#id##4+#d 4##4#tP#R9PR4#+R4P444#k9#4#dd#44dkPkPP44kd##kRdRR4ttP#d0i44i#40##4++tPPdk###4 ' PERSONAL SERVICES 101-40510-113 SALARIES REGULAR 23.475 19805.7D 14.187.25 0 9.297.74 39.56 r 101-40510-112 SALARIES - T=M3/04RT TIME 6.500 964.55 51822.10 0 677.90 10.43 101-4051D-114 F-0 0 YERS COWR IB/PENSION 3.272 356.71 2,707.44 0 564.56 17.25 �- 101-40F10-115 E-PLOYERS COVTRTB/INSUR 690 122.16 427.56 0 262.44 39.03 TOTAL oERS3N4L SERVICES 33.937 3,249.22 23,144.36 0 10,792.64 31.80 r. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101-41510-220 OFFICE SJPoLIES 5,500 253.99 4.725.18 0 774.82 14.09 101-40511-225 GENERAL SUPPLTES 50D .00 80.29 0 419.71 83.94 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 69000 253.99 4,805.47 0 19194.53 19.91 SUPPLIES 101-90510-320 C]NSJLTI4G/C]4TRACTEO SER 9,500 192.50 20#77.45 0 7,022.55 73.92 101-40510-321 OTHER SERVICES 19803 313.19 1,516.34 0 283.66 15.76 101-40510-334 PRINTING G PUBLTSH14G 500 130.66 229.28 0 270.72 54.14 101-40510-335 T.NSURANC= 44,000 .00 26,344.14 0 179655.86 40.13 101-40510-337 4Ar4r G REPA M/EQUi2MENT 407 .DO .D0 0 400.00 107.00 101-40510-341 TRAVEL CINFERENCE G SCHOOL 300 27.80 219.54 0 580.46 72.56 101-40511-342 SU3SCRTPTTONS 6 4E49ERSHID 4.400 90.30 51-548.00 0 19148.00- 25.09- r 101-40510-399 MTSOELLANEDUS =XPENS=S 100 .00 53.42 0 46.58 45.58 TOTAL SUPPLIES 61.509 754.15 36,388.17 0 25,111.83 43.83 TOTAL °rNANCE/IJSURAMC=/ACCTG 101,437 ►,257.36 64,339.00 0 37,099.00 36.57 C i 1 y'' f. � L • A I T 4 3 N T • 9 U 0 #T R c P 0 2 T F O R F T S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 r AUGUST 31. 1934 - ACC]UNT Vl. 4CC7'JVT NAME BUDGETED CU42=4T MOUTH YEAR-TO-DOTE ENCUMBERED 9ALANCE Y REMAIN i .,_ #44i#t#t}trb4tri*dd0ftitfffd444f bt4it4tt4bbtd##04bt44tr4d4t#id#4i44dPfttt#ittt44t44i 4iiti4bi4b4ii4biRPl Ol t#i4ttptt0k9l44titikdtpipippp 1, -- t GENERAL FUND 4 EXPENSES 4 FTN%4CE-ASSESSING r • t ititttktrkb}ftd4tRbbPbb44fbbtkttbfblf4t44444tktftft44404btp40 ktktlkbpt4i!!i0!!kltkt tkpt4kttt04RkiRlRkt44tplk#4#tilt#44pdtpptttbtpppp PERSONAL SERVICES (. 101-40530-113 SALARIES REG'JL4R 2.565 197.10 1.514.10 0 1.050.90 4).97 101-40530-114 E4P C3NT3-PE4SION 305 600 13.73 0 291.27 95.50 101-405: 0-115 EM? CIAT2-INSURANCE 175 .00 .00 D 175.00 103.00 TOTAL ?ERSDNAL S°_RVTCES 3.045 204.30 1.527.83 0 1.517.17 49.82 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101-4)530-?2S GENERAL SUPPLIES 33 .03 .DO 0 30.00 103.00 i TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30 .30 .00 0 30.00 103.00 SUPPLIES 101-40530-323 C04S'JLTF4G/CJ4rRACTED SER 17.103 .00 .00 0 179100.00 103.00 101-43530-3?1 OT,4ER SERVTCES 103 .3D .03 0 100.00 103.OD 101-43530-334 PRrNrING G PU3LISHt4G 15 -DO .00 0 15.00 10).00 101-40530-341 T34V=L C)NFERENCE 6 SCHOOL 3 -)0 .00 0 .00 .00 101-43530-342 SUBSCRIPTIONS G MEM9ERSHI? 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 TOTAL SUPPLIES 17,215 .00 .00 0 17.215.00 100.00 TOTAL FI444CE- ASSESSING 20,290 204.00 1,527.93 0 18,762.17 92.47 { C •�' CI I ( C • 4 v I H 3 4 Y • B U D G E T RE P ] R T G n R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31. 1994 ACC'IJVT vJ. 4CZ3J4T 444c BUDGETED CURR_VT M NTH YEAR-T3-DATE EN:U45ERED BALANCE 9 R_MAIN iii4Rkitpdd!##*44.tf ttf!!ftl4f 4tt4lffRff iii#*i4i#i#tOfd#iif 44**#t!•44f tRiliRilfff*tfRRi4•fff*4flRRRf kRiif iRtif RR RR{RiiRliRRRRRRRRiRt R GF-J-RAL FUND t EXPENSES i LEGAL ►t iRiiiipif$fdk.�}ppltttfff 4#ftititf titttti♦4itfRffttffi*ffifRtf if of ittilRtitiff RffRRRR*f iRR R*iRiRi ii lfRRRRf ii Rf Rf RiiRiiiRiiitiiitiR SUPPLIES IDi-4)6n',)-3?') Gr4EZAL LEGAL 8.000 1.446.50 5.507.00 0 2.493.00 31.16 101-4060)-3Zi ITHER SERVTC=S 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 101-439n0-372 P23SECJTTOVS 19.009 1.521.15 10.619.72 0 8.380.28 41.11 TOTAL S'JDPLIES 27.000 2.967.75 16.126.72 0 109873.28 40.27 VITAL LEGAL 27.003 2.967.75 16.126.72 0 10.873.28 40.27 r 3 i { l ( l l L L • A v T H l 4 Y B U D GT R = P 0 2 T 0 R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31. 1934 ACCIU4T 43. 6,.'.:3J4T 4A4F BUDGETED CURQ=4T 404TH YEAR-TJ-DATE ENCU43ERED 3ALANCE Y REHAI4 - fii•t14k++pkk4Mp+kkMRkMdRk4+kdkiiddtttdkRtd t#i#+RtditkitMitdtidkkRtkik4dRktRiktdttf•ffff tfkt#ttddtttMiitttti dffdfftiktf tttifftitfftt "� + GE4=RAL + EXPENSES + ENG14EERT4VPLA44TNG/ZONING d ditttt4dRdddpt4dkdRRdd►fftdRt dtikRttRRttRt+RRdRitRt+tfittt itRittktdfkttt ttRfRi#titttfitf#tiRd ttttiitRtt ittiiiiiRiRiiRtiititikttRtti C,INTIACTUAL SERVICES 101-43700-22S G54ERAL SUPPLIES 100 .DD .00 0 100.00 100.00 T.1T%L CJNrRACTIIAL SERVICES 100 .JD .00 0 100.00 103.00 SUP°LIES 101-47703-3?J Cl4SJLTT4G/Cl4TRACT=O SER 29903 .JO 5.50 0 2,894.50 99.81 101-43700-330 PRI4TI4G G PU3LISHI4G IOJ .00 19.74 0 80.26 87.26 101-40700-301 TQAV=L-C_INFERE4CE-SCH00LS IOJ .00 .03 0 100.00 103.00 101-40700-302 SO SCRIPTIONS E 4E4RERSHIPS 50 .00 .00 0 50.00 100.00 TJTAL SJpDLTFS 39157 .30 25.24 0 3,124.76 99.20 TITAL =NGT4E RI43/PLA4/ZONI4G 3,250 .00 25.24 0 3,224.76 93.22 r i I .• ! v T H 7 V Y • > 8 U 0 S F. T R E P O R T F O R F I S C 4 L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 319 1934 ACC9'J4T 40. 4Ci.•-IJVT 444E BUDGETED CURRc4T M04TH YEAR-TD-DATE ENCUMBERED BALANCE 9 R?MAIN r at+tassaaassasxoaasssaassasaasssaasrss.oe{saaosa{{att{{st{s{{tatttst++++t{ataasa+++aaa++attta#+t++asst{+ts+►{a+aas+sa++{+++s+stasesaa , + GENERAL • EXPENSES + CITY BUILDINGS '' +ta+a4fa44aitfa+a,att{a+P{t+tf aaRta0Ra+4a{+taat4f{a4{+++{{a{+++{a►{++{{R{{t+a{a{s{{{+t+{+{taa4+{t{i{{f+{{{aa4+aa+a{+Rat{a+a{{R+{4a+a PERSONAL SERVICES 107-00453-110 SlLARIES REGULIR 19,555 1.51200 12,477.50 0 7,178.50 36.52 101-00950-111 OVERTIME S4L441ES 150 .00 .00 0 150.00 103.00 q 101-43953-114 Ey"L]YE?S CO`7TRI9/PE4SION 2,353 170.10 1,547.55 0 802.45 34.15 101-40950-115 EMPLOYERS COVTRTB/I4SUR 19155 191.92 765.48 0 389.52 33.72 TOTAL DERS)NAL SERVICES 23.311 19374.02 14,790.53 0 8.520.47 36.55 C CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101-43950-225 GE4E24L SUPPLIES 953 143.54 605.37 0 244.63 23.78 i TOTAL CJNTRaCTU4L SERVICES 950 143.64 605.37 0 244.63 29.78 SUPPLIES 101-40950-320 CO4S'JLT14G/C)4TRACTEO SER 38,003 200.30 19,130.00 0 18,870.00 49.66 101-4795!1-3.21 OT4ER SERVICES 600 .00 375.60 0 224.40 37.40 101-90953-331 C•144'JVIC4TIO45 9,500 460.32 6.506.05 0 1.993.95 23.46 101-40950-335 UTILITIES 19,200 841.46 169698.43 0 2,501.57 13.03 101-40950-337 MAINT G REPAIRS OTHERS 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 101-49950-340 MsTNT 6 REPAIRS/BUILDING 14,003 .33 19,505.44 0 59505.40- 39.32- 101-40950-341 TRAVEL C34F G SCHOOLS 403 .00 .00 0 400.00 100.00 101-40950-349 HTSC. EXPENSES 3 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 r TOTAL SJPPLTES 809700 1.502.09 62,215.52 0 18,484.48 22.91 CAPTTAL EXPENSES L 101-40950-453 M&C414ERY F. EOUTPMEVT - 400 .00 280.09 0 119.91 29.98 �I 101-40950-1459 OTHER IMPROVE'1°_4TS 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 TOTAL :APTTAL = OENSES 403 .00 280.09 0 119.91 29.98 TOTAL CITY BUILDINGS 105,261 3,519.74 77,891.51 0 27,369.49 25.00 i L LI ' L "T r - --- fr ., • �, e i T 4 3 N V • B U D G E T R E P O R T F O 2 F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 r AUGUST 31, 1934 ACC71UNT V0. A':l'JVT VAMF• BUDGETED CURRENT MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE ENCUMBERED BALANCE f REMAIN r aaataeaaa+saa+aakssrisass*$asai+ssss*saaakp#aa+**aaaois4ad#isskas►s$$saprkiasfaaoaasadaiaas$s+pssa*as*apoa$eadd*aasdi*a**aooaoaoo$*o -, + GENERA: 0 EXPENSES • CIVIL DEFENSE ' "' R$#bf14kR$kbf##af+$kki+tRlk$a►f Ri4kRpk4**k+a*F414ft$*Pfa$ad/*#**pit**a*aldi1f14**dd$***Pppt*4+*a*ida4idf lPpp#*apaaf pa*#i#apptl4t**dp PERSONAL SERVICES 101-410nn-11D SiLARIES REGULAR 15,36D 1.271.33 13,545.90 0 5,314.10 33.51 101-41n,10-114 E4PLIYERS CDNTRT6/PE4SION 19905 290.79 864.39 0 1,040.61 54.63 101-410OD-115 E4PLIYERS CONTRIB/INSUR 1102.0 .00 297.90 0 722.20 70.80 r TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 189785 1,561.79 119708.D9 0 7,076.91 37.67 CO>JTRACTU&L SERVICES r 101-41003-225 r=4EI AL SUPPLIES 25D .30 33.95 0 216.05 85.42 T!1TAL =]NTRACTUAL SERVICES 250 .00 33.95 0 216.05 86.42 C SUPPLIES 101-41nOD-331 C-lM.,4JVICATID4S 925 4.70 262.89 0 662.12 71.58 L 101-4100D-334 PRINTING G PUBLISHING 100 .DO 54.30 0 45.70 45.70 101-41003-339 4AI•NT G REPAIRS/EOUIoMENT 125 00 24.99 0 100.01 83.01 101-1410(10-341 TRAVEL CI NPEREVCE G SCHOOL 19190 .00 72.50 0 19117.50 93.91 TOTAL SUPPLIES 2,343 4.7D 414.67 0 1,925.33 82.28 CAPITAL FXPENSES 101-41003-453 4tCiT4ERY G =2UIPME4T 575 .30 304.3D 0 370.70 54.92 { TOTAL :APITAL EXPENSES 675 .30 304.30 0 370.70 54.92 T!1TAL CIVIL DEFENSE 22,050 1,566.49 12,461.01 0 9,588.99 43.49 1, � L • A 4 1 H 3 N Y R O D OT R = P O R T - F O R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31, 1994 ACCl74T 49. AC:3J4T 449E BUDGETED CUR2=4T 1104TH YEAR-T3-DATE EN:U48ERED BALANCE Y REMAI4 filtlttR!!blot##bt►bkk4f►4i.tlkbklbf kkkl##t##tRtRdf•iiRf itffii4ifikffRfffftfffktitfifttRtRtf ktttttRtf if#if#}RRt##fitRtff#fR#RRf it##ff # GENERAL • EKPFNSFS R P3L[CF PR3TECTI)4 fRtf Rf tflfkf#dd4ktfklf tf tttt4kkRt#tRi#R#ifR##f ttftRf titffttltftRfYtRRi}Ritfftfftffit ttf tfdtftittRR#d#tRf R#ttRi###tt##Rf RRRRR#FRfff#f PERSONAL SERVICES 101-411nn-ill SiLRIES IEGULA2 342,1ti5 ?7,323.74 222,27D.45 0 119095.55 35.04 101-41100-111 OV_2I[4F 12,500 232.38 6,415.70 0 6,084.30 49.67 101-41100-112 SALARIES-BIK? DATRIL 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 101-41100-113 SALARI=S P T - SECY D .30 .DD 0 .00 .00 101-411DD-114 EIDL)YERS CU4TRIB/PENSION 42,945 3,303.35 27,679.25 0 15,266.74 35.55 101-43101-115 Fl-L)YERS C04TRIB/14SUR 21,191 2.953.72 11.660.32 0 9.530.68 44.98 101-411OD-117 0/T :3URT 4,200 45.46 762.84 0 3,437.16 81.84 TOTAL DERS34AL S=RVICES 423002 33,359.35 268,797.57 D 154,214.43 35.46 C3r1TRA:TUAL SERVICES 101-41113-225 GE4ER4L SUPPLIES 8.303 3.75 6.224.53 0 2,078.47 25.03 TnTAL C34TRACTJ4L SERVICES P.303 3.75 6.224.53 0 2,078.47 25.03 SUPPLIES 101-41133-321 ITHER SERVICES 4,553 40.)0 1,652.50 0 2,997.50 64.46 101-41170-331 C344J4ICATI345 4.770 .30 102.20 0 4,667.80 97.86 l0I-4110D-333 CARE PRISON12Sl5KT4G FEES 14.503 889.35 5.389.90 0 9,110.10 62.63 101-41103-334 PRINTING C PUBLISHI4G 1,913 .30 566.00 0 1047.00 7D.41 101-41103-339 44-14T C REPAIRS/EOUI24ENT 495 .00 51.00 0 444.00 89.70 101-AIIDO-341 TRAVEL CINFF.RE4CE C SC403L 1015 150.00 1.238.32 0 576.68 31.77 101-41103-342 Sl13SCRIPTIONS 5 4E49ERSHTD 593 .00 169.40 0 420.60 71.29 TOTAL SUPPLIES 28.733 1,078.35 9,169.32 0 19,563.68 69.09 CAPITAL Ex2ENSES t 101-41113-454 FUR4ITUR= G FIKTURES 1.344 .33 305.00 0 1,039.00 77.31 TOTAL C401TAL EK2E4S=S 1.344 .00 305.00 0 1.039.00 77.31 TOTAL D3LI:E P23TECTI'14 461.382 34.940.45 284.486.42 0 176,895.56 38.34 r • S 1 J T H J N Y • B U D G4EP a = P 0 2 T - F 0 F F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31, 1994 ACC'1J4T 47. Af._33vT VANE BUDGETED CURR=VT 494TH YEAR-TI-DATE =N:U43ERED BALANCE Y REMAIN ###tPttf#tkp##pppPkFPff Rf###ktt#tpPttk######'it#######ff#Pfk######Ptk##fttf tf tfff•##f###P#ff if##f#fff#fff##Riff###f##tk##f#ff#ffft### I • GENERAL # EXPENSES # FIR= PRnTE:TT34 ttAfttfftFptktt#i,Pt#t PPf#t#tPttf ttttt#tfRt#ffttf#tf4f tfff#pf#f#kMtttttt ftt#fft#f#fff##ff#P####f#ftt###fftfft##t1#f ttf#ktff#ff#tff#f ' PCRSnNAL SERVIC=S f. 101-412n0-110 SALARIES REGJLAR 176,955 L4.929.99 111,425.34 0 65,529.66 37.03 101-41200-111 [W RTIME 3,000 .00 3,143.04 0 143.04- 4.77- F' 101-412n1-112 SALARIES - T=MD/PART TIME 30.500 2,768.94 23,619.19 0 6081.82 22.56 r 101-41200-114 ECPL3YERS C04T4IB/P=4STn4 29,323 1 ,217.19 20032.05 0 7087.95 27.85 101-41200-115 FIPLIYERS CJ4TRT9/T4SUR 12.560 2.197.90 31892.40 0 3,767.60 29.76 I TnT1L PER53NAL S?.RVICES 251,435 21,113.90 167,511.01 0 93,923.99 33.38 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101-41201-225 FIR= 3REVEW1 3V SUP MES 350 55.73 135.99 0 714.11 84.01 101-412.00-2?5 G VERAL SUPPLI=S 4.645 163.37 3,785.32 0 899.69 19.20 T9TAL C74TRACTJAL SERVICES 5,535 224.10 3.921.21 0 1,613.79 29.16 SIIP3LT=S 101-412D0-3?0 C34SJLTI4G/C3JTRACTEJ SER 520 .DO 365.70 0 253.30 43.85 101-41200-321 3T4ER SERVICES 3.145 196.DD 676.98 0 2.468.02 79.47 101-41200-331 C141JVICATI04S 2,200 .DD 247.62 0 1,952.38 89.74 101-412n0-337 MkINT C REPAIRS nTHERS 0 .DD .00 0 .OD .00 101-412n0-339 M4I14T E REPAIR/E0UTa4ENT 650 104.70 268.62 0 381.38 53.67 101-41200-341 TRAV=L CJNFER=4CE G SCH33L 3,730 758.00 1.969.41 0 1,760.59 47.20 101-41201-342 S03 S:2IPiT0N5 S 4E43ERSHID 375 .00 660.17 0 214.83 24.55 TIIT%L SUP"LIES 11.220 1.069.70 4.189.50 0 7,030.50 62.66 i CADTTAL EXDENS=S 101-411.00-433 MICHINFRY E =]'JTPMEVT 9,580 1 .397.39 1,539.29 0 7.140.71 82.27 Tf)TSL :.1PTTAL EXDE4SES 8.683 1.387.39 1,539.29 0 7,140.71 82.27 TW AL rIRF PRnT=CTION 276.970 23,793.99 177.161.01 0 99.708.99 35.01 C i f I � l � C l nt I e T H ] N Y -> F U D G E T R E P •J 2 T F O R F I S C A L Y E A R 1.9 B 5 r- AUGUST 31. 1934 ACCIUNT 40;' ..'ACC3JVT VAME SUOGETFD ' ' CURR=VT RNTH YEAR-T']-DATE ENCU49EREO BALANCE Y REMAIN - *oiaaaQaooaaoa#oaeasaasaaaaasasasaaaaeaaeaaass#aosaaaeosesaoaaaoetoa*asaaaaaaaa*aa*asaae*eaoaaesaaaeeo*aa*eso*aaasaaaa****o*eaatae*s. ;:-:- * GENERAL a EXPENSES a INS -BLDG/?L9G/:ATG/HEALTH ' '- " " ' #*#aaa#a#POa##aa#e#aa4R#af**tae#####aaa##a*a4aa####*##aaaaaa•aa#a9a*a*aafee*aa*********aataea*a****a*a**Paaa#***#****aa*aa****#0***4 (' PERSONAL SERVICES 101-413'10-110 SALARI=S REG'JL%R 69925 532.40 4.094.52 0 2.830.48 43.87 101-41300-112 SALAITES-TEMP/PORT TIME 4.000 290.30 3.082.95 0 917.05 22.93 101-41300-114- EM?L]YEQS COVT414/PENSION 922 37.28 19142.46 0 320.46- 39.99- (' 101-41303-115 E4PLJYFkS CONTRIB/INSUR 410 .30 445.60 0 35.60- 9.68- TOTAL ?ERS-INAL SERVICES 120157 850.48 8.765.53 0 3.391.47 27.90 r C94rRACfUAL SERVICES f� ` 101-41300-225 G=V_2AL SUPPLIES 75 .30 12.OD 0 63.00 84.00 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75 .30 12.00 0 63.00 84.00 SUP?LI?S (- 101-41309-334 PRINTING E PU3LISHIVG 150 .30 129.75 0 21.25 14.17 101-41309-341 TR4V:L C]NFEREVCE E SCHOOL 209 .00 .00 0 200.00 100.00 101-41300-342 SU3SC2IPTIO4S G 4E4BERSH7? 125 .00 115.03 0 10.00 3.00 TOTAL SUPPLIES 475 .DO 243.75 0 231.25 49.68 TOTAL I4-3LDG/3L3G/HTG/HEALTH 12.707 850.49 9.021.23 0 3.695.72 29.01 c ti r - � t t L A 4 T H 3 N Y • ° U DO•T -' R ? ? 9.1 T • F OR F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 r AUGUST'31. 1994 ACC7UMT N3. 'ACC:IJNT NAME BUDGETED CUR2=4T MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE ENCUM9ERED. . BALANCE Y REMAIN • ##4#♦i0pf4ti444b4fptf iQt46#p4401Rp4f44p#♦♦♦##tQi QP#46#4##4##d#4##ttP##4##♦6♦#P#6#4448404#it4♦#44♦t♦Pbi#tkPdP#Q4P46•♦PQ#####4884Q#### # GENERAL ♦ EXPENSES # A4T44L CONTROL • - - #♦♦♦8R#4ffkk44444#8PR 8Pp4#tp8♦f 8P♦8♦#48488##PPPB#♦♦♦P♦♦♦444#49#8118#488♦844♦1♦pi♦#f 4dd4♦♦QPBt#♦#OPPP 446♦444444#Q##PQ♦t##♦Q#♦f♦4•#844 ...- CONTRACTUAL SERVICES r 101-41900-225 GF4E2AL SUP93LT=S 50 .00 35.75 0 14.25 28.50 I' TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50 .00 35.75 0 14.25 28.50 { SUPPLIES 101-41900-320 ClYS'ULTT'IG/CIgT.R4CTED SER 1.700 195.35 742.55 0 957.45 55.32 TOTAL SUPPLIES 1.700 195.05 742.55 0 957.45 55.32 TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL 1.753 185.05 778.30 0 971.70 55.53 - C f lh. •I� "r,l l • 0 v T H J 4 Y • B U 3 G E 1 R = P O R T - F U R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31. 1994 ACC1I4T 411. ACCJJYT 4A4F BUDGFTFO CURR=VT MJ4TH YEAR-TO-DATE EN:U45ERE3 9ALANCE L R=4AI4 Rif@####R►tt►t##►1►►►tRkRt#d►f#►iR►kRRRtt►kRdRiRt►RR#Rl tdRktR#Rt#@ ii#R@ ffRRR1►RRt#R►t#f 4tf @►R @►@RfRRf►Ri @ @tRif*R►t►*iRtR*@@88848888• •' * GFNERA_ R EXPENSES * PUBLIC WORKS RtR88►t#Rfd►Rf#�@@ @P►►►kfR►#fRf►f RffftRt @####ffR►#R tf t@ Rf RR@@##R►kR►RtRf►@f►#►8188#818888 @►RBii Rif#►#R8f8RR►iRt##ii @iiRRfi @ @►Bi►RI►B PFRSJNAL SERVICES 101-420D0-I11 SALARIES REGJLAR 139,515 13,322.49 86065.10 0 51,749.90 37.33 101-420nD-111 ')V=RTI4E 3,75-3 .00 5.003.64 0 1,253.64- 33.43- 101-420nl-112 SALARIES-TEMD/BART TTME 14.000 2.607.50 12.714.43 0 1,295.52 9.18 101-42000-114 EMPLJYERS C04M B/PENSION 16.905 1,303.36 11,652.60 0 5,252.40 31.07 101-42nn-3-115 E4PL]YE<S C94TRTB/I4SUR 10.075 19366.32 6.278.28 0 3,796.72 37.68 Tr1TAL 'ERSJNAL SERVICES 183.345 15.599.57 122,514.13 0 60.830.90 33.18 C14TRA=TUAL SERVICES 101-4?013-?23 S4ALL TJILS 150 .70 75.34 0 74.96 49.97 101-42013-224 STREET SIGNS 1,30-3 .30 1,100.3B 0 199.62 15.36 101-42nOD-?25 GEVERAL SUPPLIES 47.70D 6.677.28 30.449.97 0 17,250.03 35.16 TOTAL C34TRACTJAL SERVICES 49.150 5.677.28 31,625.39 0 17.524.61 35.66 SUPDLI=S f 101-42100-321 3T4E? SERVICES 1003 27.75 1,210.23 D 99.80 S.91 101-42013-335 UTTLTTIFS-STR=°T LI54TS 31.050 2.129.46 19,781.27 0 12,268.73 39.51 101-42000-3i7 MAINT 6 REPAIRS-nTHER 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 101-4?000-339 Rr4T4LS 203 .00 .00 0 200.00 103.00 101-4?000-399 MA14T G REPAIRS - E2UIP 3.303 509.32 2.437.17 0 862.83 25.15 101-42 001-340 44T4T r. REPAIRS OF 3LDGS D .00 .-3D 0 .00 .00 101-42100-341 TRAVEL-C3NFERE4:E-S:47JLS 30D 6.33 57.50 0 242.50 89.83 101-42nn0-342 SUBSCRTPTIONS E ME45ERS4IPS 50 .00 10.D0 0 40.00 83.00 101-42000-399 MTSC. EXPE4ScS 30D .30 .00 0 300.00 10D.00 TrITIL SUPPLIES 36,509 2.672.33 22,496.14 0 14,003.86 33.37 CAPITAL EKDENSIS 101-92001-453 SACH14ERY C =lU1PM=4T 0 .DO .00 0 .00 .00 TOTAL :401TAL E4DE4SES D .00 .03 0 .00 .00 TOTOL DJBLIC W7R(S 269,9Q5 2►049.98 176.635.63 0 92.359.37 34.33 f � f ( {r t � r { A 4 T N 3 N Y • 4 U l T R E P ❑ R T °'> F O R F I S C A L Y E ARR 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31, 1934 ACCOUNT NO. " AC.IUVT NAME BUDGETED CURRENT MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE ENCUMBEPED BALANCE Y REMAIN ' -- "4tf#itriRRbf 4tb+RttptttbtottPtPttbbtptPbptpiiit4Rf tfOtOffbf tfiO4P4Pft#4#4POitrttOfi#iP4Rt4trtROttr#ktttrRtrf Ptt4trtr4i4trtif t4trf 4d40tiRRfi444 , 4 GENERAL' P EXPENSES 4 PUBLIC d3R(S-14AI4T/RE?AIR ED ' - - ' - "i444R#t4pPfPRit�4p4Pl PPtfttR4PtifiitR44P+l titit44ii#itf4iPtt#4f#44fii4##4i4t4ti4dt#t44f044ft44df#tP44tft44dt#4d##t##4#4#dddORii##t#4d PERSONAL SERVICES 101-422»-110 SALRT=S REGUL4R 269305 ?9142.73 179179.75 0 9,126.25 34.69 1 - 101-422OD-111 nwERTIMF • 303 .00 75.43 0 223.52 74.51 '101-4?2nD-114 EM'LIYERS Cn4TRIB/PE4SIO4 20903 213.92 1,720.87 0 1079.13 38.54 101-42200-11a; FM?LIVERS CUNTRT0/TNSUR 19914 290.DO 19157.80 0 756.20 39.51 TOTAL ?-=RSJNAL SERVICES 31.319 2,645.65 209133.90 0 119185.10 35.71 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101-422DO-2?1 Pa2TS C TIRES 0 .00 49.59 0 49.69- .00 101-422nD-??2 MDT]R FUEL F, LU3RTCANTS 32,000 60.00 9.840.04 0 22,159.96 63.25 101-42203-223 54ALL TOM 200 5.71 52.59 0 147.31 73.66 i 101-42210-225 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 14.503 1 ,494.35 8,696.43 0 5,903.52 43.44 TOTAL CINTRACTUAL SERVICES 46,90D 1.560.06 189638.9D 0 28.161.10 60.17 SUPPLIES t• 101-42200-320 C3.14SULTI4G/C]NTRACTEO SER 0 .O0 .00 0 .00 .00 101-42200-321 OTHER SERVICES 500 .DO 551.20 0 48.80 9.13 ln]-422_nD-339 MAINT C REPuIRS/EQUTPMENT 31500 141.17 3,839.81 0 338.81- 9.68- TOTAL SUPPLIES 49100 141.17 4.390.01 0 290.01- 7.07- CAPTTAL EXPENSES 101-42200-453 4a.4TNEPY C EOUIPySNI 19750 .39 .00 0 19750.00 10D.00 TOTAL CAPITAL EKPcNSFS 1.750 .00 .00 0 19750.00 100.00 TOTAL DUB WORKS/4AIN/REP EDUTP 83.969 4.347.98 439162.B1 0 40,806.19 43.60 . . ._ -- .,� -� - - --. -- A 4 1 H J M r • 0 1 GO I q R P 0 1 T F O R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 f AUGUST 31, 1934 ACCOUNT 43. ACCOJVT 4A4r aUOGETED CU.R3=VT MOUTH YEAR-T-3-DATE ENCUMBERED BALANCE Y REMAIN .-- ssRR#•eaaaa««Raa«#«re RR«va aRafRRRRRRa4ROearRRaRaaeRReaae#e.a4aea#aeReaaeasea#Reeeea4R44esaaaRaa4#4Rf#4a4!lfaei#aiesaeaR4saeaeeafeee4a4 ... =- 4 GENERAL r EXPENSES 4 TRE= E NEED CAR= - !##eteppRpfR«f«apRaeRfARRRe#fr4rapRR44f eRR###RR4e4aa#of RRRIa44eR4RR44RRkiRieeek4a0f e40paR4R44RfRRRe#4p44ii 4.a i4l44#!!4444444#peat 4iti PERSONAL SERVICES (. 101-43100-11) ' SALIZI=S REG7L%R 12.563 696.50 6.212.24 0 6.347.76' 50.54 101-431OD-114 FMPL COVT/PE-VSION 1.495 18.64 IB-64 0 1.476.36 99.75 101-43100-115 EMPL COVT/TNSURANCE 903 .33 .OD 0 900.00 100.00 TOTAL DERSINAL SERVICES 14.955 715.24 6.230.89 0 8.724.12 58.34 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I 101-43100-223 OFFICE SUPPLIFS 20D .33 .OD 0 200.00 103.00 y; 101-43100-225 G=4E2AL SUPPLIES 300 .30 .03 0 300.00 LDO.00 TOTAL CJVTRACTU4L SERVICES 500 .DO .00 0 500.00 103.00 SUPPLIES 101-43103-3RD GIVSJLTTVG/CIVTRACTED SER 503 .30 .03 0 500.00 103.00 101-43lnD-330 TREE REM:IVAL SUBSIDY 0 .30 .OD 0 .00 .00 101-43103-334 PRIVTING G PU9LISHT4G 0 .30 .00 0 .00 .00 101-4310'1-339 MAIVT E REPAIRS/EGUIPHEVT 750 .30 654.31 0 95.69 . 12.76 f 101-43100-344 REAUTIFTCATI9V/TREE PLAVT 0 .00 .OD 0 .00 .DD TOTAL SUPPLIES 1.253 .03 654.31 0 595.69 47.66 { CAPITAL E%�F.NSES 101-41110-453 HACHIVERY E EOUIPMEVT 55D .00 327.43 0 322.57 49.63 TOTAL CAPITAL FXDENSES 653 -DO 327.43 0 322.57 49.63 TOTAL T2EF C NE=3 CARE 17.355 715.24 79212.62 0 10,142.38 59.44 Y - i� � L. t 4 T 4 7 N Y • R U D T R E P O R T P D R F I S C A L Y E A R' 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31, 1934 ACC?JVT 4D. -ACC]JNT NAME. BUDGETED CURR=NT MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE ENCU49ERED 3ALANCE = R=MAIN - ddidR4Pkkk-dk*#'##?kkkkR#kk#!#Rk Qf if tf Rf Rk4Rid4tttidt ii#t#tt+dtRd#iRP+#t#PQ#t++}R RQtR4+t4#f#RdRdlftRR#d•tQRtPftt+4tiR08iR+P4t dR.0 QR4td# .. . + GENERAL 4 EXPENSES + PAR(S - " - fRRPfR PRkkifRf+if#R4Rfdifft+kl+itfPtf RPM+R4##Rd4tR4+44R+fR#4#4t#4RR4#iRRRIfRRRt4RR++Pt+4######kf if PtttdPRdtRit#dOtR44f4tt44lt+tR+Qt+ .� PERSDNAL SERVICES 101-05570-110 SA! A2•TES - R=6ULAR 22.520 1.993.41 10.615.19 0 11#903.81 52.66 101-45500-111 OVERTIME 500 .OD 93.27 0 406.73 81.35 101-45500-114 F4DL CONTR/PF4STDN 2.735 199.24 1#888.45 0 B46.55 30.95 �• 1D1-45500-115 EKPL CONrR/I.NSR 1.747 575.50 1#566.20 0 173.80 9.99 i TOTAL DERS7NAL SERVICES 27.495 2.767.25 14.164.11 0 13#330.89 43.48 r CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101-45507-2?3 SIALL TAILS 150 .DO 75.04 0 74.96 49.97 -- ID1-45507-2?5 GENc2AL SUPPLI=S 2.707 427.70 1#669.03 0 1#030.97 39.18 TOTAL C7NTRACTUAL SERVICES 2#85D 427.70 19744.07 0 1.ID5.93 33.80 l SUPPLIES I 101-45503-337 44INr C REPAZIS - 3T4=R 2007 132.17 287.09 0 2#212.91 89.52 101-4551)1)-339 REVTALS 107 .00 36.00 0 64.00 64.00 101-45500-339 44IVT G 2EPATRS/EQUT34ENT 1.201) 273.23 1x867.15 0 657.15- 55.60- 101-45500-349 MISCELLA14EDUS EXPENSES 0 .00 .03 0 .00 .00 TOTAL SUPPLIES 3000 405.40 2#190.24 0 1#609.76 42.36 CAPITAL FXDENS_S 101-45500-453 4AC•114ERY L =OJTPMEVT 1#307 .70 .03 0 11000.00 103.00 101-45500-459 OTHER I43ROVE4=4TS 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 TDTAL =41DITAL =KD=NSES 1.000 .00 .00 0 1#000.00 100.00 TOTAL DARK 35.145 3.600.35 18.098.42 0 17.046.58 43.50 T0T4L GENERAL FUND 1 1540.981 111076.36 949.615.64 0 591065.36 39.38 BALeVC= GENERAL FJVD 45.719 l3#949.97- 250,743.51- 0 296.462.51- 543.44 I n� C L L. - -- �-7- - � - - -- -•- e v 1 v ] v r 9 U 010-T n R F i S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 r AUGUST 31. 1994 ACCn'JVT 413. AC:]JVT VAYE RUDGETFD CURREVT 494TH YEAR-TJ-DATE ENCUM9ERED BALANCE ! P.EMAIH �- tf**$**41441*1141**#i**06*******41###t*#t#hh41hk41#ttt 4111#41tMt#ikitttf#*011#6*fkiif**##fit*i##f#f#41#M##iR►iitk###tf kf###ifMttf 4141********#tit f HRA FUVD 41 REVFNUES t fit#fki#PRt41f##*i*##1141##*111141**#hf##tth#41#MtttiRtitif hh•ftff 041#itt11RiiitititMRRtffMi#iifii##4#t#ff41Rif#f#i tit#tf#tfffif 41if#i41tifiktii �' TAXES 301-30131-00) P17)PERTY TAX=S ) .30 4,962.97 0 4,862.87 .00 TnTAL TAXES 0 00 4,862.97 0 4,862.87 .00 301-33500-0)D STATE 410 D .00 .03 0 .00 .00 RISC=LLANE]US REVENUE 301-3991')-03') "RA 0 00 .00 0 .00 .00 TnrAL YISCELLAVE]'JS REVENUE 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 TDTAL H24 rUND 0 .30 4,862.97 0 4,862.87 .00 t i t l L • . 4 1' H 0 N Y R-q-=n_'0 E T R = P 0 R ,T 0 R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8.5 r AUGUST 31, 1994 eccl'�Nr v[1. AC:374T VAME " 9UDGETFD C64R_4T '434TH YEAR-TO-DATE ENCUMBERED BALANCE 'Y R=MAIN r ' tpttt6}4!!ip!!}!}!}flibpit##!!!4#pfi#iPpi Rd idPdPbftl P#4####itd#d#PPdpO###OOdtiPtddt Oitdppt4Ppppp#RtPOPQQQQRRQQ#QQQPQpQPpQQOQPPOPQQQQ. ��:• R HRA FUVD R' EXPENSES * PER33NAL SERVICFS ""' " "" ' -" ' •-' RR4tt#RkiRiR#R#Pd,�#4 PRtftPO#'tRitPtptiPp#f RttOd#RttR#RPdpti,RttRtfP R#t#Pf►RRRf•ittPtiPttpftt##ttRRPPPPtpRPtRt Ptpt4PPPtPfttPRPPPOPittf '�` PFRS3MAL SERVICES. 301-4D1DD-111 SALARIES 5.100 975.DD 975.00 0 4,025.00 83.50 �^ TOTAL ?ERSINAL SERVICES 5,n03 975.00 975.00 0 4,025.00 80.50 SUPDLI=S 301-4D1D3-3?1 L:;AL FEFS 29009 327.55 3,600.23 0 10600.23- 80.01- r- 301-401:10-311 TRAV=L C3NFR E SCH13LS 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 301-40100-319 4TSCFLLA4EOUS FXPE4SES 50D 4,250.04 109410.03 0 9,910.03- 982.01- TOTAL SUPPLIES 29500 4,577.59 14,010.26 0 119510.26- 460.41- 301-40100-675 LAUD ACQUISITI34 0 .30 .00 0 .00 .00 TOTAL DERS14AL SERVIC=S 7,500 5.552.59 14,995.26 0 79485.26- 99.80- C C. r_ C. C r C � C •. 4 a 1 4 7 4 Y • R U !' c T R = P J R T F O R F T S C A L Y E 4 R 1 9 8 5 r AUGUST 319 1934 ACCOUkJT 47. AC�194T 4A4E BUOGETFO CURR=4T M34TH YEAR-TJ-DATE ENCU49ERED BALANCE l REMAI4 r j {#i{tt#ddkikk#•k4diidikdk►ikkiikkf k/ikf{kf kdikifkkk tkkkRkktdkfkk#ikktf{kf{4f#fkkkt#d#t#{#.{tkk#k#k kk tf kf ttk{kk#{t#kf k4{tt{{{{{k{Ri{tfR j t CAPITAL EOM34 VT FJNO • REVENUES f � r f{#{tt*dikfdt##d#ittiidii###dk{dt4if t#diik###dfff{44kiR#i{iff#kfi►•#fft•iii{i•{tf4{ifff ifffftt##ftfff{{t{{Vitt{f#tif{ff#f{ffkt{ittf4 i - INTERGJVFR4MENTAL REVENUE 401-3201)-003 REV=4JE FROM 3T4FR AS=-NCI-=S J .OD .OD 0 .OD .OD TOTAL T4TERG7V=444ENTAL RFV=NU 3 .00 .3D 0 .00 .00 INTEIGJVERVMENTAL REVENUE 401-36700-03) TRA4SFERS 0 .DO .OD 0 .00 .00 TOTAL INTERGDV_244E44L REVEVUE D .30 .00 0 .00 .00 MTSC=LL4NF3US R=V=NUS 401-33100-03D T4TEREST EAR4E) 0 .30 .OD 0 .00 .00 401-39400-000 CAPITAL EQU12 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 401-39670-33) TR44SFERS 170.000 .OD .OD 0 170.000.00- 100.00 TOT&L 41SC=LLA4E3US REVENUE 170.000 .)O .00 0 170.000.00- 10).OD t TOTAL CAPTTAL F4'JIPME4T FUNO 162.500 59552.59- 14.985.26- 0 177.485.26- 109.22 i r i L • . a I ri J N Y • R U D G E T R _ P O 2 T — -:> F n s F I S'•C 'A ;L. T E 4 R l 9 B 5 r AUGUST •31. 1934 ACCOUNT NO: AC:-I'M VANE BUDGETED,. . CURR=VT MriNTH' YEAR-TO-DATE EN:U9BERED.' BALANCE R REMA14 . .. _:. t4tdl48k4k 8pp4#bdf4kf4kkkk 4tk4td44tkdp###tp4ttdpt##4414#k4k6p#4#4f kt4tbpkpk44 kk4pdtl48i4i6l88spppt itrtr!#i!#!4##tritr4tr4##ipii4#iii4iitri, �._. # CAPITAL EDUTDM74T FUND ► EXPENSES + ANTICIPATE!) REVENUE • • ' ' � i!4#kk4pkfff?#t#hkttRkOfktRkbf tf kpdk4k#kkk#84tOdpl 44f40 t#kkkt4.d4dflOptkltppf tt tpt 4t4##4l 4pd4#p44ktpt4td ltr!lR44*t4!lpp44R!!40lk4kl4pi 1 - SUPPLIES 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 �. 401-40100-570 TRANSFERS 0 .DO .00 0 .00 .00 TOTAL S°JPPLIES 0' .00 .07 0 .00 .00 c TOTAL 4VTTCIPAT=1 REVENUE 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 L r �I' l_ �• e T H J 4 Y • F% t1—.ft r E T R = P O R T 9 R F I S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 r AUGUST 31. 1934 ACC'1'J4T ACC]JJT 4A45 BUD6ETFO CURR=NT 494T4 YEAR—TO—DATE ENCUMBERED 3ALANCE Y R°_MAIN ff if kf#tk4###"lii4i4#khaahff4atk#4##iifi###fiat#ff#fR#/1#iiR#t#tatl kt#t4R#411Ikflfittii##fitff#tif•ffff iiiifiii iffif iRiffffffiffRf iff f CAPITAL E9UTP4=NT FUND ! FKPENSES f APP2IPRIATI04S Rf ff ikiRkak!#task##Ithlak#!t#tk!##R#RR###t1iRt#Ritff#ttlfR#f#R##a#Ifiif 4##f#RffRtRffffffiRftiti4#fRiiiRiiffiifiiRRRR iRiitiiifiRffifff ..,, SUPDLI=S 401-47250-053 4A:i[4=RY r, =aJTP4E4T 0 .00 25,020.25 0 25.020.25— .00 TlTAL SJPPLIES 0 .00 25,020.25 0 25,020.25— .00 TOTAL Are?JPRIATI74S 0 .00 25,020.25 0 25,020.25— .00 T^TAL CAPITAL =0UIP4E4T FUND 0 .00 25,020.25 0 25,020.25— .00 r BALAVC= CA�]TAL =QUID cUND 162,503 5,552.59— 35.142.64— 0 137,642.64— 121.63 1. f i l r' r t � l � l = D R F I'S C A-L Y.'E A R •1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31. 1994 4CCOU4T 40. ACC9114T 4AME BUOGETFD CURR_Vi 434TH YEAR-TO-DATE E4CU49ERED• 9ALA4CE- Y R?MAIN kp#blktt!'}'b4,!ltt k*4.94 0 f#/#f#4itki#4lRffbfR#it}}f11#d!#bttlkPtrfd4}}}##!!}!}!!#}Rifbfi9ilRkktltt!!P►ftp4P#tr#RPPdttfPddPp4trPPtrPPtrPtP0P4 0 SEWER FU4D p EKPENSFS . t APP23PRIATTONS �. • PPPdtrttOkp#fpt*t4pk Of trf kf 44pPIRRf Rf t#trtrp4itd#Rp11R#4.btr4d#ft4fl P#tRRPPf t#4lp441 trPIPtr#f tPP4lkpptplPPPPpkPP4iRtIPtrPktf4PPtr4P4dPtrPPIPPPP PERSONAL SERVICES 702-49100-113• SALARIES REGULAR 43.355 39707.33 319771.29 0 11093.71 25.72 702-491nD-111 OVERTIME 1.001 .00 211.73 0 798.27 79.83 t 702-4910")-114 E'4PLOYERS C04TRIB/PENSION 5.265 396.52 3,379.45 0 1.885.55 35.81 r 702-43100-115 E4?L3YERS CO4TRT8/I4SUR 2.965 481.32 19854.16 0 1,010.84 35.28 TOTAL ?ZRSOMAL SERVICES 52.485 4,595.54 37,215.63 0 15,268.37 29.09 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 702-43100-227 OFFICE SUPPLTES 1,IOD .30 706.00 0 394.00 35.82 702-43100-222 MDT••)R FUEL 6 LU3RICANTS 2.500 .00 625.00 0 19875.00 75.00 702-491OD-2"?3 SyALL TOILS 50 .D0 .00 0 50.00 103.00 702-43100-226 GF4ERAL SUPPLIES 2,701 439.75 1,462.44 0 1,237.56 45.84 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5.350 438.75 20793.44 0 3.556.56 56.01 ni SUPPLIES 702-43110-3?3 C)14S'JLTI`IG/Cl4TB4CT20 SeeER 29425 .30 19162.99 0 1,262.01 52.04 702-79103-321 OTHER SERVICES 601 .33 265.94 0 334.06 55.68 t. 702-43100-331 C944UNICATI04S 250 30.21 94.25 0 155.75 62.30 702-49100-335 I.NSURANC= 6.101 .00 1.842.65 0 4,257.35 69.79 702-13103-335 UTILITIEi 3,475 279.72 19585.76 0 19899.24 54.37 702-49100-337 MAINT E REPAIRS - OTHER D ..30 .00 0 .00 .00 702-49100-337 4AT4T G REPAIRS/EOUTP4E4T 3.000 200.30 3,721.84 0 721.84- 24.06- 702-49100-341 TRAV-L C3NFERE4CE C SCHOOL 151 .DO 103.50 0 46.50 31.00 702-43100-343 M W C C CHARGES 315,650 269304.16 529608.32 0 263,041.68 83.33 TOTAL SUPPLIES 331,653 ?5.914.19 61,385.25 0 270,264.75 81.49 CAPTTAL EXPENSES 702-43103-451 41CHT4FlY F. E)!1TP4E4T 0 .30 .00 0 .OD .00 707"-43103-439 SA: CHARGES 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 TOTAL CAPITAL EX?EMSES 3 .03 .00 0 .00 .00 C SUPPLIES 702-43101-670 TR44SFERS TO OT;.AER FU40S 3 .10 .D1 0 .00 .00 702-49130-630 ACCUMULATED DE?R 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 ,I 702-49100-693 4.14-3UDGETED EXPENSE D .30 .00 0 .00 .00 rl TOTAL SUPPLIES 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .DO TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 390,485 31,839.39 1019395.32 0 239,089.68 74.03 TOTAL SEWER FUND 3909485 31.838.38 101,395.32 0 2899089.68 74.03 BAL44Cc SEWER FU4D 849945- 319917.13- 44,746.71 0 1299591.71 152.74 l.. L. a!' • * A T H ] '4 Y • = N U � S c T R = D O 2 T 0 R F T S C 4 L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31, 1994 ACC]JVT V7. 4CC3JVT 444E BUDGETED CURB=VT M34TH YEAR-TO-DATE ENCU48ERED BALANCE R R=MAIV r fiiiRtp#p4kp#####k4fkktkpt#tp#k#fftkf R#ktktttR4tftt ti+tfi#►tiff##Yk►t#fttt►ttffftd{tf+tti#tt##ft}f•t4f#fRt►{ii t##tt#fRi#4t►di#t►d### i SEWF4 F•TVO ► R=VFNUES # e. f►fft•f4p4#'t#t'}0#t#ttkktMt#f PRtfRRRttRff Rff iikfittt►f►►RtRRf Rf tttRkttf tf►ffffk►#iiift►tt#►f#f iii if d►Rd►►Miff iififi►dp►Rti►R#Rti►►►iR MISCcLLANE]US REVENUE 702-39100-011 IVTEREST-INV=ST4E4T EAR414GS 0 .00 687.95 0 687.96 .00 702-3R3n0-ODD P°R4TTS 143 .00 40.00 0 100.00- 71.43 70?-34401-00) MTSC REFJNDSCR=14BURSE4ENTS SOD 7.50 7.50 0 492.50- 99.50 702-33503-O0D SERVICE CHARSES 305.000 86.25- 143x204.02 0 161.795.98- 53.05 702-3950..^-130 MTSC EARVTNGS-REPAIRS D .00 .00 0 .00 .00 702-39701-ODO IVT E TVVEST4=4T EARVINGS 3 .DD 1,352.55 0 1.352.55 .00 702-33100-030 SAC :4A.;FS 0 .00 850.00 0 850.00 .00 702-39973-730 R=SERVES 0 .DO .00 0 .00 .00 i TOTAL 4ISC_LLA4EIUS REVENUE 305,540 79.75- 146.142.03 0 159,497.97- 52.18 TOT4L SEWER FU40 305,640 79.75- 146.142.03 0 159,497.97- 52.18 l t ( Y e . L L Y • P. U 70'T R';-:T P J. 2 T C ❑ R F I S C A L Y,;-E A R 1 9 8 5 AUGUST 31, 1934 ACC7'JVT .47. 4CClJVT'3AyE BUDGETED CURRE4T,M914T4 YEAR-T']-DATE ENCU43ERED. 9ALANCE 4 REMAIN - #p+l f4++4+fn+ii44fhiffd6ftta+0ffth+pfftttttt4,tf tf+0+f4 ftff4fit•k+►fdpf#dfpff 4f if44trtf 4f 4ttt4d+tl trpl pf tfp4#Rf!lbb O.ptbl tr.tr tlpbbtftrtr#bdb ` ! WATFR FUND• + EXPENSES f APPROPRIATIONS - - -- !!!dp#ihif+ftpt4kf+tf,f d4k4f?fff pf0pf 4#f Oft!#p44!l kfttf#trfl f44#d#p!#1!!p►!f##trf###!4#tl pbflf!#1#!!!!4l44fkffbbtrlRlt#!f#!d###t!!f#!#! . . , PERSONAL SERVICES 703-49?1)D-11] SALARIES REGULlR 66,455 5,640.55 48,923.89 0 1.7,631.11 25.53 703-43200-111 OVERTIME 7.100 401.36 2,033.01 0 59066.99 71.37 703-49?01-114 EMPL3YERS COyrRTR/PE.4SIO4 4.735 652.79 69015.41 0 2.719.59 31.13 703-49201-115 EIPL]YERS CO.uT2IB/TVSUR 4.605 88D.DD 3,302.52 0 1.302.48 23.28 TOTAL PERS]NAL SERVICES 86.995 7,574.70 60.174.83 0 269720.17 39.75 C(l4TRA:TUAL SERVICES 703-43230-221 OFFICE SJPPLI=S 2.329 .00 1.552.61 0 767.39 33.OB - 703-43200-2?2 43TOR FUEL G L13RICANTS 4.900 .DO 1.225.00 0 3,675.00 75.00 7D3-49200-223 SMALL TO3LS 350 12.3D 20.15 0 329.85 94.24 i 703-49200-2.25 GE4ERAL SUPPLIES 6000 532.12 2.469.96 0 3,531.04 59.85 TOTAL C74TRACTUAL SERVICES 13.570 544.12 5.266.72 0 8,303.28 61.19 SUPPLIES 703-43203-3?] CIVS'JLTT4G/C]4TRACTED SER 6.113 47.00 21030.16 0 4.079.84 65.77 703-45200-321 OT4ER SERVTCES 19503 .00 369.25 0 19130.75 75.38 703-432n0-331 C144J4TC\TIUVS 1,500 68.07 670.35 0 825.65 55.04 703-43231-334 PaIVTING L PU3LTSHI4G 30D .00 13.29 0 286.71 95.57 703-432n0-335 T4SUR4NCE 12,650 .00 1,929.91 0 10,721.09 84.75 703-432.00-335 UTILITIES 36,750 4,968.6D 29,410.24 0 7,339.76 19.97 703-4320D-337 4&IAT L .REPAIRS - 3THER 3.250 289.59 2.922.43 0 327.52 13.08 703-432,13-331 RENTALS 203 .DO .00 0 200.00 100.00 3 703-4920-339 MAI.NT G REPAIRS/EQUIPMENT 36.930 234.75 49,447.45 0 12,517.45- 33.9D- 703-49200-340 MAI.VT 6 2EPAIRS/BUILDING 1.600 .00 86.00 0 1.514.00 94.63 ; v, 703-492DO-341 T2AVEL C3NFFRE4CE G SCHOOL 350 .00 581.25 0 231.25- 65.07- 703-4320;1-342 SJ3SCRIPTIONS E ME43ERSHIPS 50 .00 49.00 0 2.00 4.00 TOTAL SUPPLIES 101,193 5.509.41 87.511.39 0 13.678.62 13.52 CAPITAL EXPENSES 703-4320D-453 4�C4IVE7Y C. FlUTPMENT 0 .DO .00 0 .00 .00 703-48200-454 METERS G FIXTURES 6,000 .DO 29780.48 0 39219.52 53.66 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSES 69003 .0D 29799.09 0 39219.52 53.66 SUPPLIES ;i • 703-432OD-671 TRANSFERS TO ]THER FUNDS D .00 .09 0 .00 .00 703-49200-690 ACCUMULATED OEDR 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 703-492DO-690 APPROPRIATIONS 0 .DO .00 0 .00 .00 TOT4L SUPPLIES D .00 .00 0 .00 .00 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 207.655 13.627.23 155033.41 0 519921.59 25.00 TOTAL MATER FUND 2079655 139627.23 1559733.01 0 519921.59 25.00 BALAVCE MATER FUND 89195 13.629.53- 74,922.09- 0 93911708- 014.24 I r,, • . - 6 v T H J N Y • 6 U D E T S(< P,O 2 T U R F T S C A L Y E A R 1 9 8 5 r j AUGUST 31.- 1934, ACCDUNT 4'_1. ACCOJNT VAyE BUDGETFO- CU.1R='IT- M3NTH YEAR-TJ-DATE ENCUMBERED 3ALANCE R REMAIN • afaaRaaatpaa.pph+!apaaaataiaraaairraarestaatrtataaataaaartta►s+tttriRaatttraoaRtlaatataataaataaaalatrtafaa*ttaaaaaaattttattaaaattttltaaa , - t 4ATE? FU4D t R=VENUES t tf aOfRtt#Riaad##fip i t Ra tttt*RtfRRafRpttf4Rttf tf tttfaftR/Rtlf4at#t if ttrtRR/attrtlf tt4t40 P1ttttrf 4ttf tlt/ttttfPll atattflt0tttatttrt111fttf MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 7D3-13103-033 IVTEREST EAR4=3 3 .30 .Do 0 .00 .00 M,SCrLL44EIUS :�EVEVUE 703-39300-033 oE2MTTS 903 .00 210.00 0 590.00- 73.75 703-39357-030 METER. TAPS. =TC 103 .00 35.OD 0 65.00 65.00 703-39401-OD3 1ZFF'U4DS 6 4ET41URSE4ENTS 1.903 7.50 7.50 0 992.50- 99.25 703-33503-03D SFRVIC= LHARG=S 18D.003 5.90- 809029.33 0 99,971.67- 55.54 703-39560-03D NITER ON E OFF CHARGES 353 .00 127.50 0 222.50- 63.57 703-39571-033 LATE PAYMENT G READING FEES 2,503 3.00- 403.00 0 2,097.00- B3.8B 703-39600-030 METER REPAIRS 103 .30 .00 0 100.00- 100.00 703-33700-333 IJTEREST C INVEST EARNINGS 31,000 .00 .00 0 31,000.00- 103.00 703-3392D-0311 SALES TAX 3 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 703-33951-003 METER DEPOSITS D .30 .00 0 .00 .00 { 7D3-39991-033 R°SERVES 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 TOTAL IISC=LLANEIUS REVENUE 215.153 2.3D- 80.811.33 0 135,038.67- 62.56 TOTAL 44TER FU40 215.950 2.30- 809811.33 0 135,038.67- 62.56 AGENDA ITEM: Reports-4b STATUS : Informational offlE moo/Re ROAM Metz i i S1° Paul Pioneer Press Classified Ads in this section M Arm IL-linA board By Steven Thomme ant attorney general assigned to the - y g gn pen- 'interim Alters the night before naming him sfen writer sion fund, the Public Employees Retire- interim director of the pension fund. Eight directors of Minnesota's largest meat Association. Dissident board member Morris Ander- public pension fund, who are being sued Murphy said his office would not defend gpq who is the plaintiff in the lawsuit.at- over their selection of a director, decided the eight because they are being sued as tempted to enter the meeting but was told Tuesday to ignore legal advice and use private citizens and not as the pension it was a private session unrelated to state money to defend themselves. fund board. That same reasoning pre- PEA business. In an 6-6 vote, the board decided to hire eludes them from using state money to Murphy said Tuesday a private attorney, but use state funds. No hire other legal counsel,Murphy said. • - urp Y y the eight board attorney was specified,and no estimate of members either met as a board majority, The suit.filed in Ramsey District Court, and therefore are entitled to representa- the cost was made. accuses the eight of violating the Minseso- tioq or they met as private citizens with- "It is an inappropriate expenditure of to Open Meetings Law. The eight met be- out discussing PERA business, as they public funds,"said Jon Murphy, an assist- hind closed doors with union executive claim,and must defend themselves. i Wednesday, September 19, 1984 i S f0ju.. i l if, LOIL .He said he was not certain what re- Donald Moe, DFL-SL Paul, contend that 4 course the attorney general's office would Alleys helped get the eight directors.elect- have to the decision to use state money to ed so he could control the board. hire an attorney. One response, he said, Moe plans to convene the Senate Gov- a could be to stop payment of any check for ernmental Operations Committee soon to legal fees as it goes through the state investigate the appointment of Allers.One Finance Departzn=L thing Moe wants to scrutinize is whether Alleys said M was wrong and that Allers is qualified to oversee collection Murphy g and distributi on of pension funds. the attorney general's staff was moved by Allers and PERA Board Chairman Cecil "political.reasons" in refusing legal de- Halter have refused to answer reporters' 4e ., gnes4ous about Allers' qualifications, and Ally is a eoatraversial flgnre in Hirinne- the'issue has never been discussed publicly i aota pension policy.Critics, including Sea. Please we Pension/5C . .. .Vensione. i r Iir'e'.' private lawyer Continued from Page 1C the pension program that includes by the board numerous pictures of himself iden- tified as executive director. The ppro-Allers majority on the a The pro-Allers majority on the board 'ltiesday rejected a motion board killed a move to seek a rec- to hire an executive placement and legislative review. The associ- ' service and start a nationwide ation's Legislation Committee on search for a permanent direector_- Monday recommended the board, AUers was appointed on an interim ask the Legislative•Cornmission on basis to replace Mike McLaren, Pensions and Retirement to review who resigned Aug.28 to take a sim- PERA elections. ilar position in California A Despite the interim nature of the Minority board member Carol appointment, the board has not in- bers fear that y groups with m fty dicated when,if ever,it will start a can unduly influence boardmelec- search for a permanent director. lions. Nine of the 15 members are Anderson and other board dissi- elected by members, the rest are dents fear Allers will have en- appointed by labor and govern- trenched himself firmly in the job meat groups before a search is started. o Allers acknowledged that he In other action Tuesday continues to draw his salary as •The board told Allers to use the president of Local 124 of the title of acting director. Still in his School Service Employees Union first month on the,job, he has pro- while being paid a $68,000 annual duced a slide presentation about salary by-PERA. • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION • ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution Reports-4d September 21 , 1984 Ordinance Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Final 1985 Budget Other September 25, 1984 Hearings To Be Set ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David -M. Chi-Ids ,. City Manager SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Council may/or may not wish to have a dis- cussion on the budget on the 25th, but a motion is needed to establish final hearings on revenue sharing and city budget final documents . The September 25th meeting would also be a good, time to recommend any last minute changes , additions or deletions to the budget . You received a computer printout with all the amended figures along with the last City Council agenda books . • FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES : RECOMMENDATION: See attached copy of the Mayor' s Memos for brief summary of proposed budget which will be in the various news media shortly. • CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : September , 1984 • MAYOR'S MEMOS BY BOB SUNDLAND, ST. ANTHONY MAYOR For many St. Anthony residents , the summer has been one of rebuilding their homes , lives and businesses in the wake of the April 26th tornado. It is heartening to see the strength of our residents who chose to pick up the pieces and start over after disaster struck. In the coming weeks , we will see lots of activity at Apache Plaza, Midwest Federal, Faith Methodist Church, to mention a few. Although Johnson Greenhouse and Hertog' s Floral will not be rebuilt, it is my understanding that we may see a number of new single family lots in their place. I am optimistic that St. Anthony will be back bigger and better than ever and our residents deserve the credit for their efforts . Other new projects are on the drawing boards or under construction, making this a particularly exciting time . A new clubhouse is under construction at Gross Golf Course. A major mausoleum structure is proposed to begin in Sunset Memorial Park . The long vacant Northgate Motel is proposed to be converted to office condominiums . The St. Anthony Health Center plans a major expansion to begin in the spring of 1985 . The combined value of these projects is in excess of • $5 million dollars . Another long awaited project, the Kenzington Condominiums , for persons 55 and older, has encountered a minor delay , but the City Council , City staff and our redevelopment consultant have been meeting closely with the developers , Arkell Development, and we are well satisfied that the project continues to be viable and that delays such as we are currently experiencing are only temporary. We are excited that 60 units are already sold and feel that it won' t be very long before we hear people saying they wished they had bought a unit while they were still available . The next 30 days should provide us with the answers about the financing needed to begin the construction of the first 128 units of the 495 unit Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project. In other business , the City Council has spent many hours preparing and discussing the City Budget for 1985 . We face several challenges in providing a balanced budget with the lowest possible property taxes in St. Anthony Village . First, revenues at the municipal liquor operation, which previously put nearly $400 ,000 annually into the general operating budget of the City will be closer to $300 ,000 to $325 ,000 for 1985 . This reduction of $75, 000 to $100 ,000 , must be offset by budget cuts , revenue increases or a combination of both. A careful look at budgeted expenditures shows an increase of 4. 4% in the General Fund budget • from $1,540 ,981 in 1984 to $1 ,609 , 330 in 1985 . Main program breakdowns in 1985 expenditures are as follows : r> -2- • Program Amount Includes Police $507 ,952 Police , prosecution costs , animal control. Public Works $421 , 415 Street maintenance , equipment maintenance , parks , tree and weed care. Fire $314 ,433 Fire, civil defense . Finance '$128 , 690 Accounting, insurance, audit, assessing, and elections . Building Maintenance $108 ,000 Including City Hall rental and City utility costs . General Management $ 76 , 550 Management and general legal costs . Mayor/Council $ 35 , 300 Council and contingency funds . Inspection Services $ 16 , 990 Building, plumbing, heating and planning/engineering . TOTAL $1, 609 , 330 To offset the decreases in liquor revenues and the level of state aids which are still $33, 000 below 1983 funding levels , an increase in pro- perty taxes will be required. For a home in St . Anthony Village with an assessors market value of $81 , 000 , the increase in the City ' s share of property taxes will be $19 . 44 per year. For a $100 , 000 home that increase will be about $26 . 95 . The Council felt that this increase in taxes was necessary to make up for losses of other revenues and to avoid reductions in staffing in the police and fire departments and to maintain current levels of street maintenance , snow removal and other public works activities . The St. Anthony City Council has consistently been conservative in levying property taxes and we feel that the proposed increase , although more than we would have liked, still maintains the tradition of sound financial management and responsiveness to rising costs faced by all of our taxpayers . I invite questions about the budget, city operations and future . plans and ask that you address them to me, Bob Sundland, Mayor, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, MN 55418. I will answer questions directly or when of general interest. I hope to be able to answer in a future issue of Mayor ' s Memos . • CIVIC -CENTER - DRIVE TELEPHONE 484-337 1 :S 'S e Vi e MINNESOTA SS 113 September 7, 1984 AGENDA ITEM: New Business-1 Mayor Robert Sundland STATUS,: Per Council c/o David Childs, City Manager City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418 i t f Dear Mayor Sundland: f i As you are undoubtedly aware, the 1984 Minnesota Legislature has directed the Metropolitan Council to select a site for a regional Olympic-quality speedskating facility. The City of Roseville, through its Ad Hoc Speedskating Committee, plans to submit a proposal that the ! facility be located in Roseville, preferably on the Woodview site on Larpenteur Avenue east of Dale Street. t I If such a facility is completed, it will indeed be a very big j • boost for skaters in the seven-county metropolitan area, as well as all skaters in the five-state area, in preparing them for future national , j world and Olympic competitions. i We are seeking your support for our proposal and are enclosing a I sample resolution for your consideration and adoption. i In seeking your endorsement, we call your attention to the following: ` 1. The Woodview site is strategically located in the seven-county metropolitan area. 2. The site has convenient highway access, being in close proximity to highways I-35W, 36 and I-35E. 3. The largest local concentration of speedskaters is in the City of St. Paul and northern suburbs. This area has produced eight' of the twelve local speedskaters currently on the national team. 4. The City of Roseville is willing to support the operation and maintenance of the facility initially until other sources of funding can be found. 5. Roseville is conveniently 1'ocated near the University of Minnesota and other educational facilities that will permit skaters to train while they are attending school . Aw September 7, 1984 Page 2 6. There is an abundance of hotels, motels and restaurants in the area to accomodate''spectators and skaters during competitions. 7. There are very few existing projects of metropolitan scale in -the northern suburbs as compared to other areas. Location of the regional speedskating track in this area would help achieve a better and more equitable balance in the placement of such projects throughout the metro area. It is our hope that we will be able to submit a copy of your resolution of support along. with our proposal. Please return your resolution or a letter of support in the enclosed self-adressed envelope. Since our proposal is due October 12, we would greatly appreciate your action on this matter at your earliest possible convenience. We feel your support will make a difference in the selection process. To assist us in our planning, we will contact you soon regarding your decision. Thank you for your consideration. Yours very truly, Nis. June Demos, Mayor City of Roseville P, . John Goedeke, Chairman oseville Ad Hoc Speedskating Committee Enclosure .7 w RESOLUTION 84-042 • A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITY OF -ROSEVILLE AS THE SITE FOR A REGIONAL SPEEDSKATING FACILITY WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has determined that there is a need for a 400- meter artificially refrigerated Speedskating Rink. in the Metropolitan area, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is seeking proposals for a Speedskating site and implementation program, and WHEREAS, the Roseville Ad Hoc Citizens Speedskating Committee has selected a site in the City of Roseville, and WHEREAS, this site is strategically located in the Metropolitan area with excellent access from I-35W, I-35E and 36, and WHEREAS, the largest concentration of speedskaters is in the City of St. Paul and northern suburbs with this area producing eight of the twelve local speed- skaters currently on the national team, and WHEREAS, there are few metropolitan facilities in the northern suburbs as compared to other areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of St. Anthony supports the City of Roseville' s proposal to locate a regional speedskating facility in their community, and • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be provided to the City of Roseville. Adopted this day of 1984. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for administration: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTIES OF HENNEPIN/RAMSEY) I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of St. Anthony, Hennepin/Ramsey Counties, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing resolution of a meeting of said City Council held September- 25,. 1984, with the original on file in my office, and • the same is a true and complete transcript therefrom. Carol B. Johnson St. Anthony City Clerk • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ORDINANCE 1984-005 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS 445: 00 THROUGH 445: 35 (BINGO) AND SECTIONS 905 : 00 AND 905: 05 (BETTING) OF THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES, AS AMENDED The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains as follows : Section 1. Sections 445: 00 through 445: 35 of the 1973 Code of Ordinances, as amended, are hereby repealed. Section 2 . Sections 905 : 00 and 905: 05 of the 1973 Code of Ordinances, as amended, are. hereby repealed. Section 3. Section 1 of this ordinance shall be effective on March 1, 1985 and Section 2 of this ordinance shall be effective upon publication. First Reading: September 11, 1984 Second Reading: September 25, 1984 Adopted: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Published in the St . Anthony Bulletin on 1984 . • • • tdlb LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1Q94 Ch. 502, Art. 11 Ch. 502, Art. 12 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1 984 607 — _ property —_ 349.11 PURPOSE. edian the m ratio of the class of ro rt of the subject in the same count city, or town of the subject ro rt is lower than the assessment The purpose of sections 349.11 to 14031 349.22 is to Y regulate and y. --Y — — — ser►t" dbe ser+dasl of thQ gerwe Of b4W aril tw Pcwbihil of ratio of the suhiect- m rt by at least ten percent. — — binge I� forms of a�mblinB to prevent their commercialization,-to insure If the above criteria are met and a reduction in value he the grounds shall inte rit of operations, and to wide for the use of net r� only for lawful discrimination is granted based upon the sales ratio study, the reduction shall purpose reflect one the difference between the assessment/sales ratio of the subject I Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349,12, is amended to read: property and 110 percent of the median ratio of the class of property of the sub ect ro rt I 349.12 DEFINITIONS. Sec. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. Subdivision I. As used in sections 349.11 to 349,21 349.22 the following Sections 2 and 4 are effective for the 1985 assessment and thereafter, terms have the meanings given them. payable 1986 and thereafter. Sections 1, 3, and 5 are effective the Lay followin Subd. 2. "Lawful gambling" is the operation, conduct or sale of bingo, final enactment. I raffles, paddlewheels, tipboards, and pull-tabs. Subd. 3. "Active member" means a member who has paid all his dues to the organization and has been a member of the organization for at least six months. ARTICLE 12 Subd. d 4. "Bingo" means a game where each player has a card or board CHARITABLE GAMBLING for which a consideration has been paid containing five horizontal rows of spaces, Section I. Minnesota Statutes 1983 Supplement, section 340.14, subdivi- with each row except the central one containing five figures. The central row sion 2, is amended to-read: has four figures with the word "free" marked in the center space thereof. Bingo Subd. 2. RESTRICTIONS. Every licensee shall be responsible for the also includes games which are as described in this subdivision except for the use conduct of his place of business and for conditions of sobriety and order therein. of cards where the f ures are not preprinted but are filled in §y the layers.ayers. A ssess, or o rate, or permit the keeping, possession, or player wins a game of bingo by completing a" a preannounced combination of No licensee shall keep, po.. 11e spaces or, in the absence of a preannouncement of a combination of spaces, any operation of, on the licensed premises, or in any room adjoining the licensed atus, nor permit f combination of five spaces in a row, either vertical, horizontal or diagonal. premises, any slot machine, dice,or any gambling device or appar any gambling therein; nor permit the licensed premises or any room in the same, Subd. 4 5. "Bingo occasion" means a single gathering or session at which or in any adjoining building, directly or indirectly under its control to be used as a series of one or more successive bingo games is played. a resort for prostitutes or other disorderly persons, except that gambling devices "Checker" eans a person may be kept or operated and raffles conducted on licensed premises and adjoining cards purchased bd. 5 band played dur o ing each game and e the prizes awarded go rooms when such activities are licensed by the W"0-i4 gerr+s+ae t the recorded cards, but does not collect the payment for the cards. to -� 34Q,a6 charitable amblin control board under sections 349-11 to Subd. 7. "Paddlewheel" means a wheel marked into sections contain- 349.213. No person under 18 years of age shall he employed in any rooms — —_ off— constituting the place in which intoxicating liquors are sold at retail "on-sale." i_g one or more numbers, and which, after being turned or spun, uses a pointer except that persons under 18 years of age may be employed as musicians or to or marker to indicate winning chances perform the duties of a busboy or dishwashing services in places defined as a — restaurant or hotel or motel serving food in rooms in which intoxicating liquors in a ridbor8column, ndwhichneach sectionan containstaeh hidden number or are sold at retail "on-sale." Persons under 18 years nt age may be employed serve numbers, or other symbol, which determines the winnin chances. waiters or waitresses in places defined as a restaurant, hotel or motel to serve _ food in rooms in which only wine is sold on-sale, provided they shall not be Subd. 9. "Raffle" means a game in which a participant buys ticket for a chance at a prize with the winner determined a random drawing to take permitted to serve or sell wine. - _ _ Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.11, is amended to read: Rlace at a location and date rip nted upon the ticket. Changes or additions are Indicated by underline, deletions by sFrikeeut Changes or additions are indicated by underline, deletions by btril-sow. 609 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1484 Ch. 502; Art. 12 Ch. 502. Art. 12 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1994 60 Subd. 10. "Pull-tab" means a single fielded or handed ticket or a card Subd. 15. ­Garqb ng equipment" means: bingo cards and devices fo with a face covered to conceal one or more numbers or symbotls, where one or selecting hingo numbers, pull-labs, ticket jars, paddlewheels, and tiphoards more of each set of tickets or cards has been designated in advance as a winner. k Su1x1. 16. Board- is the charitable amblin 'control board. "Pull-tab" also includes a ticket sold in a gambling device known as a ticket '1 tr. ---- — - - — Subd. 17. "Distributor" is a ep rs wh_o sells gamblin equipment h_ Subd. b 11. "Lawful purpose" means one or more of the following: (a) manufacture_% or purchases for resale. benefiting persons by enhancing their opportunity for religious or educational — advancement, by relieving or protecting them from disease, suffering or distress, Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.13. is amended to read by contributing to their physical well-being, by assisting them in c%tahlishing 149.13 NOT GAMBLING IF ORGANIZATION CONDUCTS BINGC themselves in life as worthy and useful citizens, or by increasing their comprehen- sion of and devotion to the principles upon which this nation was founded; (b) Mingo •.ball Lawful amblin is not be construed aF a lottery or a initiating, performing, or fostering worthy public works or enabling or furthering gambling within the meaning of sections 609.75 to 609.76 if it is conducted by a the erection or maintenance of public structures; (c) lessening the burdens Monte wrgaoi+"+p in ruawaphanse with I,aws tea. Chapie 2" under this chapter by government or voluntarily supporting, augmenting or supplementing services i Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.14, is amended to reac which government would normally render to the people: or (d) the improving, 149.14 ORGANIZATION MAY CONDUCT BINGO; LICENSE. expanding, maintaining or repairing real property owned or leased by an organi- zation. An organization may conduct binge tascasicaas lawful gamblin if it h- "Lawful purpose" does not include the erection or acquisition of any real been in existence for at least three years, has at least 15 active members, has property, unless the local a44 of @overRmeni board specifically authorize% the license to conduct biwgw lawful gambling from the JwA rani♦of 901'% amen boar expenditures after finding that the property will be used cxClusivcly for one or and complies with rococo♦: 34G,O to 340.21 this chapter.. more of the purposes specified in this clause. Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section' 349.15, is amended to reap Salad. 7, 21 474-21 snit of government" means the city Of town in which 349.15 USE OF PROI•ITS. bingo is prtiposed W be played or is played or, if there iF no city 4u town, the swaan�y whaFh 1 , Profits from a bingo wssasion 4" lawful gambling Tay be expended on for lawful purposes as authorized at a regular meeting of the conductir Subd. 8 12. "Organization" means any fraternal, religious, veterans, or organization. other nonprofit organization. Sec. 7. [349.1511 CHARITABLE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARI Subd. 9 13. "Profit" means the gross receipts collected from one or more Subdivision I. BOARD CREATED. The charitable gamblin contr binges osearvons lawful gambling, less reasonable sum% necessarily and actually Mnrd is created with the pr 1 wcrs and duties established subdivision expended for bingo ag nrhling supplies and egnipmeut..prizes, rent. and utilities I ---- - --- —used during the bingo gambling occasions, bingo li,aease fees compensation ptid Subol. 2. MEMBERSIiIP. The board consists of 13 members all op inn to members for conducting ganiblin , taxes reMted to bitr•go, aid rather eapewses as follows:- - - - pemnlled by I awe: la74h Chapter 2b1 imposed by this chapter and maintenance I (1� eleven persons alpointcd by the governor, at least four of whom mu of devices used in lawful amblin reside outside of the sevcn-coutitv metropolitan - Sahrl 44L "lingo manages- rnea"6 a naeo4w who has Paid all hie: daces � -- -— - -- --- tw the OFganizal OR and has hOW4 a member of the tugani�sation for at le," two (21 the commissioner of public safct or his designee; and years and has been designated 4 an oreaniatati ran tsa KA4P@Fai% tsHagra•rx a+:ir>,u L1 the attorncy general or his designee conducted by it: - — A member sS on the board�y appointment must have been a reside Suhd. .14. "Gambling manager*' means a ep rsoln who has pa all dues'to of Minnesota for at least five years. Of the appointees o_f the ovg ernor not mo an organization and has been a member of the (!rganization for at least twoX� than six ma hcjj!!!g to the same Ipo itical ap rty. A_ member appointed to t and has been designated by the organization to supervise lawful gamblin board may be removed at �Ui time �y the appointing authority. Vacancies conducted it. the hoard are filled in the same manner as the original appointment. Of t ChenKes or additions are indicated by underline, deletions by strikeaat. Chanites or additions are indicated by underline.,deletions by 46.1� • LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1984 • 611 , 610 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1984 Ch. 502, Art. 12 Ch. 502. Art. 12 .k &hall ewnsult with the local buddy" members appoint ed the governor, three arc for terms ex pinny. June 30, 1985, bingtilicetiAe, kraal unit of A local uaii four are for terms ex irin Lune 30, 1986, and four are for terms expiring June iospegtor and end P shell be deemed to have 30, 1987 After the expiration of the initial terms, appointments are for three which Perm" bingo but has not adopted � A kraal ey arc• The governor shall appoint the chairperson from amon his appointees. ��1 the pro"W"o" of Laws JA746, Chapter 344 a& its F0961asiet+t* unit of B� tai' amend its Subd. 3. COMPENSATION. The compensation of board members is that binge shau aMablish a 835 per d� spent on commission activities, when authorized tty the board, 'L Suk+d. l A kisal unit of gt►i' t and &had as4 on a p kw lisew&Mg oFganiaasitaiis to conduct bingo expenses in the same manner and amount as provided in the commissioner's Ian o u �� M � � � � of�, �.�l adopted according to section 43A.18, subdivision 2. after the date of �, p. license not issue a license until at least 3A day& of reiaolced by the g Subi1: 4. POWERS AND DUTIES.The board has the followin powers Fhall value one ' F and , be &u&Pended and duties: authority for violation of laws Ja7/a, ia W 264 OF of a" local wrdat►ce L issue, revoke, and suspend licenses to organizations and suppliers relating to bingo under sections 349.16 and 349.161; 3 Lli year the local unit of geit ►t shau &0 allocate a Lo collect and deposit license fees and taxes due under this chapter; amount of tgoney at team equal to the lesser of &'" we 2.5 POF of the — — — amauot µ collected and retained 40m bingo f�'' �o k�s�" and bingo tame& U t_o receive reports required tty this chapter and ins ct the records, in thr prig y�for the FuPe<a�i&ion.Fegulas+Ein and inspection of the conduct books, and other documents of organizations.and suppliers to insure compliance bingo f_icenses authorizin n�anizations to conduct lawful amblin t be of with all applicable laws and rules; issued by the board to organizations meetin the qualifications -of section 349.14, L make rules including temporary rules, required by this chapter; if the board determines that the license is consistent with the purpose of sections 349.11 to 349.22. Licenses issued under this section are valid for one Year and Lo register gambling equipment and issue registration stamp s under ny he.eusrwnded by the hoard for a_ violation of law or board rule or revoked for section 349.16-2; what the board determines to he a pattern o_f willful violations of law or board �.to provide rule for the mandatory tin organizations conduct- rule A_ revoxation or suspension is a_ contested case under sections 14.57 to m lawful amblin of rules of Ipa y and the odds and/or house percentage on 14.69 of the Administrative Procedure Act. each form of lawful gambling; and Subd- 2. APPLICATION. All applications for a license under this be on a form prescribed b the hoard. The board may require the U to report,annuall to the ovg ernor and legislature on its activities and section must _ _ ty — on recommended than es in the laws over im charitable gambling. apRl�g ur anization - submit a c of its articles of incorporation and other —_ — — I dcx•umcnts it dec_ms neccssar . Subd. 5. EMPLOYEES. The board shall employ an executive secretary for in the classified service as are ---- Subd. 3 FEES. The board shall !?y rule establish a schedule of fees in the unclassified service and such other employees licenses under this section. The schedule must establish three classes of license, required to enable it to carry out its functions. One or more of the employees — wful g ambln al forms except bi�- o and bin oly must be bingo inspectors. authorizing all -orms- -f la ral is the attorney Sec- 9. X349.161] DISTRIBUTOR LICENSES. Subd. 6. ATTORNEY GENERAL. The attorney g ene for the board. Subdivision I. PROIIIBITED ACTS; LICENSES REQUIRED., No Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.16, is amended to read: person may: 349.16 bACAb ORGANIZATION LICENSES. sell, offer for sale, or furnish amblin equipment for use within the state for garrib Ling purposes, other than for bin o excm t from licensing under Subdivision I. ISSUANCE OF GAMBLING LICENSES. Noibing in section 340.19, exce t to an organizaUOn licensed for lawful amblin • or sessions 349x11 to 340 23 &ball be sonstFuW to Ptah t a kicsl unit of gwMeut- - mew f-om or�ance&, Fules and � congerning fire sanded of � sell, offer for sale, or furnish amblin equipment to an organization bingo which are niece 1`64Rstia,e than&lase Fegulapons,including an eFdinaWA to licensed for lawful amblin without ha obtained a distributor license under ban the gondugt of bingo. P+ior to prenvulgating ego F*gulatiom or i&&uing a I this section. Changes or additions are indicated by undcrline, deletions by rtsikeoa+t. I Changes or additions are indicated by underline. deletions by "Fiheeut. i 612 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1984 Ch. 502. Art. 12 Ch. 502, Art. 12 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 19114 613 No licensed organization may urp chase gambling equipment from �U I the identit of the on or firm from whom. the person not licensed as a distributor under this section. — y — — �rs— — — — equipmen t was — - — purchased• Subd. 2. LICENSE APPLICATION. The board may issue licenses for (2) the registration number of the equipment; the sale o_f ag mbling equipment to persons who meet the qualifications of this — — section if the board determines that a license is consistent with the purpose of U the name and address of the organization to which the sale was sections 349.11 to 349.22. Applications must be on a form the board prescribes. and Subd. 3. QUALIFICATIONS. A_ license may not be issued under this 4 the date of the sale. section to a person, or to a corporation, firm, or partnership which has as an officer, director, or other person in a_ supervisory or management ispc ition a The record for each sale must be retained for at least three years after the rson who - sale is completed. For purpose of this section, a sale is completed when the � — gambling equipment is physically delivered to the purchaser. has been convicted of a felony in a state or federal court within the —past five ears or who has a felon charge pending Each distributor must report monthly to the board, on a form the board 1? — Y — — — - —� �- ��' prescribes, its sales of each t1'Jx of amblin equipment. Employ txs o_f the board has ever been convicted in a state or federal court of a gambling-relat- iaSp the books, records, and other documents of a distributor at a� ed offense; or may reasonable time without notice and without a search warrant. is or has ever been engaged in an illegal business. Subd. 3. SALES FROM FACILITIES. All gamblin equipment u�r- Subd. 4. FEES. The annual fee for a_ suppliers license is $1,500. chased by a licensed distributor for resale in Minnesota must prior to its resale be unloaded into a facility located in Minnesota which the distributor owns or Subd. 5. PROHIBITION. No distributor may also be a_ wholesale leases. distributor of liquor or alcoholic beverages: Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.17, is amended to read: Subd. 6. REVOCATION AND SUSPENSION. A license under this section may be suspended §y the board for a violation of law or board rule or for 349.17 CONDUCT OF BINGO. failure to meet the qualifications in subdivision 3 at �M time or revoked for what Subdivision I. BINGO OCCASIONS.No rompensetiew sh"be paid to the board determines to be a patte rn of willful violations of law or board rule. A m 6wwwesR*0A with a revocation or suspension is a contested case under sections 14.57 to 14.69 of the � an '� aaOf 80 �we — — — — er{lawiaatiow, OF itfi aaxiliafy, Of the t:Peure Of sut`viviwg ttpeuse of aw active Administrative Procedure Act. member. Gonduoiwg the bioW eseasiew mw aW " pemon net an aG4we Subd. 7. CRIMINAL HISTORY. The board may request the assistance membeF of the wrgawiaa- OF its auxiliary of the spouse ot: sur iv. -spouse of of the bureau of criminal apprehension in investigating the background of an aw asfwe rtterwber POF40GOPRIO iw the 6eRdUet of a binge e6CaBiew, exsePt by applicant for a supplier's license and may reimburse the bureau for the costs resolution of a majority of the memberabiP.recer-ded in the official minow of the thereof. The board has access to all criminal history data compiled j!y the 4ti44h nwaa-MBROgeatetN art.iatawta whe ass wet estiy RWWabera of the bureau on licensees and applicants. wrgawiaation, wr its auxiWr-y, of the spouse er suwiviwg spouse of an active Sec. 10. [349.162] EQUIPMENT REGISTERED. memheF, m" be hkW to assist MAM1 sra ~' sewduetiwg a binge esea64ew. t,ompewFStiow shaA Rot exceed S3A fw a biwge ecsasier►. Subdivision 1. STAMP REQUIRED. A distributor may not sell to an Sulam. a, No Not more than .104 bingo occasions each year or two bingo organization and an organization may not urp chase from a distributor gamblin occasions each week rhall may be conducted by any an organization,except that equipment unless the equipment has been registered with the board and has a Ow registration stamp affixed. The board maY charge a.fee of U to 25 cents for each IFaFaI unit 6 government tssu+wg ga igaliOe Ls additional vidi ��90 106 GOAdt-Gled stamp. Each stamp must bear a registration number assigned §1 the board. ` aw except as provided in this — - — subdivision. A bingo occasion &"4 may not continue for more than four Subd. 2. RECORDS REQUIRED. A_ distributor must maintain a consecutive hours. record of all gamblin equipment which it sells to organizations. The record The hoard rm must include: an organization to conduct more than two bingo — occasions in a week and more than 104 bingo occasions in a year if the boar Changes or additions are indicated by underline, deletions by rusikeow. • Changes or additions are indicated by underline, deletions. 1 614 • LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1984 Ch. 502. Art. 12 Ch. 502, Art. 12 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1994 615, _ _ r os _ gU"psia"racy eiweed&=psav+d then tote aBB�g�Valum Of NWh priaee feo a'� determines that the additional occasions are consistent with the u ire of bin" ascasio sbaA ant e+oceed $500 The 899FOSAI vahw of p4m for a binge ,,o,ons 349.11 to 349.22 and if.the followin procedures are followed: them in the case of a bingo sseaaien — — — _ — wssasioin shell wwt siiseed $2,SAp exseiit. the Eor the additional occasions, stating the diir+i►B which a gave IL tai is pli � for a aiaaiMUFA 16W of mere hail number of additional occasions applied for; gip b4µ-not �®than$509, the aggregate vehie of ptaass far the binge ecsasien the board notifies the overran lxtd of the count or home rule or shell net exceed $3,000 Marchand i6 P�r,h" be valued at fair Market retail B—nin I —Y — — — st I atutory qiy in which the a IPP icant is located; and Value, i the overnm body fails t_o adopt a resolution disapproving the Subd. 5. No expense thou be incurred or amounte paid in cowwest+eri U. — B —� —� - t be sewduct of bitage. except those reabonebly expended for binge supplies additional occasions within 30 d� of the notification. W" iron or and "wp � Pr+O^ �! or utilities,used during tjA bin" aacisioa bingo Subd. 3 2. BINGO ON i.EASED PREMISES. (� Any A pe • tiserise fees �� �� � pig, and sampeasatieri to active members who corporation, other than an organization, which leases any premises that it owns GoWh st the R� to two or more organizations for purposes including the conduct of bingo Subd. 6 3. Each bingo winner shall must be determined and every prize occasions.'shall may not allow more than four bingo occasions to be conducted shall be awarded and delivered the same day on which the bingo occasion is on the premises in any week. The board waive this restriction and permit a person or corporation to allow a specified member of bingo occasions on the conducted. premise r in excess o_f four yr week if it finds that the waiver is consistent with Subd. 1 A41 Aga ascasiwws shall be under the &ripen Ron a bingo for gross the purpose of sections 349.11 to 344.22 and if the following prcxedures are manager desigrtaied by the wrganiast� who &bag be fasPorimbU followed: — — - — receipt& and prwf+ts from binge and for the sawdust of the binge essasieri to 1 the rson or corporation•applies for the waiver, stating the number of swmpliawe with all appGsable laws and ardinanses. The bingo manager shall — �— — give a fidelity band in the sera of SIA,AtI(l in(aver of the argeriiaatien sawditiaried additional occasions sought Per neck; wn � taithtul pertwrrwa++ce at hi& duties. Terms of the bend uhall pcevide that U•the board notifies the overnin b� cif the rnunt or home rule or sl►all g+"en writing � , poet �, than 3A days statutor• SLt y in which the rep mists are located; and prior to it& sansellatkiw, The Bo' s body of a kwal uni4 of govofw iem may 3 the overnm bodv fails to adoC a resolution disc rp oving the_ waiver waive tbir, bond requirement by ►wciud+ng a Iva 400 pra"+si0A in.the bingo l+cer+se U — g---n —` — — irssiied to an or{tanifi►tiww. provided that a license sowtaining sash a prwvisiori within 30 dyys of the notification. — — to one iu waive caber shall he granted cu►ly by unaaimoii& vale (�).Any Mown which Was es any Prernrt*6 foj poirpca&e+: incladmg the soadowt of bingo ev.W"Ws shall use the Subd & No Peraan shall art_ as a binge manager far waere than ens Piaseesir. lit the rental, Ieso: reasomible sums for mauuvoarice, f++rn+ i+v►gs and �• o,he aOG.ON.aff " 044Y for lawt+il purpii&e,. as defined in section 3 tVA- shau re�xt � � licensing Subd. 4. CHECKERS. One or more checkers must be engaged for each Net less than arse earl+ year tine p�anizatiOUi bingo occasion. The checker or checkers must. record, on a form the board aathwrity'the dispos+t+oin of all receipt+:which it 'reseiveol repixt+ng provides, the number of cards Ip ayed in each game and the prizes awarded to Por*'d frown the rental Of its fa--01 to inther organizations fvu Pappooses recorded cards. The form must rp ovide for the inclusion of the registration "W40ding the swnd - of how ascasons• number of each card and must include a checker's certification that the fib s�iall sawdust biwgw on any leased premises without a recorded are correct to the best of the.checker's knowledge* No ofga�written lease fi4* a term at least eo}eal to the "Mainder 44 t term of the hirog++ shall be at a foxed mwwt-lily r� � Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.18, is amended to read: license of the erganiaation• i tease PAM the terra wt the lease Nip rate 1'@* bingo Aeca&ioii, loot to�Se B 349.18 REGAR( RbA ERS, CARDS ADO PREMISES su,h lease shall Provide that ron-21 paypaeiits be based on a pewenta"of receipts USED FOR GAMBLING. or profits from tango essa&ions lane or mare checkers shell be engaged for each binge accasion. The Sabel 4- Prizes for a single binge game &ball not exceed &I-W ohoepl checker or checkers shall record the nuwtbec of sends played in sash game prier prize, for a game of the type commonly kuwwn as a 14AW ' r! game. "diver- ( to the completion of east game and record the p4zes awarded to the recorded Changes or additions are indicated by underline, deletions by FiriturH+t. Changes or additions are indicated by underline, deletions by stvikeeui. 1 Ch. 502, Art. 12 i/LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1994 617 616 LAWS of MINNESOTA for IQ94 Ch. 502. Art. 12 Subd. 2. ACCOUNTS. Gross receipts from lawful amblin must be CA" sert+ty ' �" "� ec�urate segregated from all other revenues of the conducting organization and Ip aced in a and soaest to the best of has knowledge A k%,PA uoat of R4vefr~n4 mat' se ap rate account. The person who accounts for gamblin gross receipts and e the fesords to be on forums whi- N pr-ovid rp after m_ay not be the same pemo n who accounts for other revenues of the Subdivision 1. LEASE OR OWNERSHIP REQUIRED. An organiza- organization. tion may conduct lawful gamblin only on rep miser it owns or leases Lcases Suhd. 3. EXPENDITURES. All expenditures of bingo rp °fits must be must be for a period of at least one year and must he in writing. Copies of all itemized as to payee, purpose, amount, and date of payment. leases must he made available to empto)•ees of the hoard on request. A_ lease may not rovide for rental payment based on a rcema a of rerci is or rofits from Suhd. 4. DISCREPANCIES. If at a bingo occasion a discrepancy of _ �— - P Y - _ L1C B - _P - '�-- -- more than S20 is found between the gross receipts as reported §1 the checkers lawful gambling. and the cons recd is determined b j addin the cash receipts the discre anc Subd. 2. EXCEPTIONS. A licensed rj!ganizalion !n�y conduct raf- must be r_eporled to the board within five duke of the bin o occasion. ne.s'on a rp emise,it does not own or lease. Subd. 5. REPORTS. A licensed organization must report to the board A licensed organization may with the permission of the board, conduct and to its membership monthl on its gross receipts, expenses,• rp °fits, and bingo on rep •miser it does not own or lease for S to six d� in a calendar year, expenditure of profits from lawful gambling. If the organization conducts both in connection with a count fair or civil celebration. hingo and other forms of lawful gambling, the fi ores for both must be re-x - Y — - — separately. In addition, a licensed organization must report t_o the board Subd. 3. PROCEEDS FROM RENTAL. A licensed organization which monthly on its purchases o_f ag mbling equipment and must include the leases rep raises it owns to one or more other licensed organizations for purposes quantity. and dollar amount from each supplier separately. The report s must be includin the conduct of lawful gamblin may exl end the rental rp o cceds, less on a_ form the board prescribes. reasonable deductions for maintenance, furnishings, and utilities, !jry for lawful The rental proceed must be recorded and re °recd as rocce Is from Subd. 6. PRESERVATION OF RECORDS. Records required to be purposes. C — - — -- - �- key by this section must be preserved for at least three years and may be amblin under section 349.19. inspected b j em to cps of the board at any reasonable time without notice or a Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 1982• section 349.14, is amended to read: search warrant. 349.19 EXIEMPTION RECORDS AND REPORTS. Subd. 7. TAX RECORDS. The board may�j rule require each licensed organization to provide odes of forms it tiles with the United States department a rsaay he sc+radusted without soptp440g with the feyuireraae+ata of of the treasury which are required for organizations exempt from income tax. testrons 349 14 and 349 17, rubdivirmong a and 3, if swtadu« fa-) is G4mA&A+o++ Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.20, is amended to read: with a sou_my fak coadwsted by a soawt-y "riculk-PA wKiel Of ANNO:iatNa+►, the state fair 'Conducted by the state affisultural Mvziety of a twit: eelehrati" 349.21 RECORDS � AN RAT$ MANAGERS. rec,�gniaed by resolution or c0ww similaf offw- l at;titua of the 14w4d R+werniog ht�d that the u:c-ouiduc4ed tos no rnorP tban 13 so+u:ecutive dayr, Fiac;h Hrga►uaatiow rball keep reserdb et its gs� reseip<F and 1►reGtF twr y provided ' each hingo oCCatiiooi Gross reseiplr. shall he sompafed to the cheskeds feserds iia any oae caler+daar year; of, (b) by an that. "mmh u looA than f+ve ' � � aoy � y� for the binges oss:rritart by a Pecswn who did not tell Cards far the binge essat:ic+n. A41 do d-wiiwrar faun grot;a reseiplf; from a bingo ossasiwra rhaA be documented Subdivision I. -REQUIRED RECORD OF RECEIPTS. A licensed or- with reseipio ou other records The distribution of PFOA46_r1tall to ganization must kS�p a record of each occasion on which it conducts gambling, Payee, amwtu>a and date,of payment. includin each bin o occasion and each dqa on which other forms of lawful BiW g FOGOOPI amblin are conducted. The record must include gross receipts, quantities of .@ all fsertt an free la s if an expenses and rofits. The board may h rule rovide for the oe 14W and PL m a separate aCSwi+wf. F3ash erganiaatien shall mai+ataiu tLy_ _ — '�- — -� — 'L-- - - repafate reserdr: of its bingo oPeratiews The persew.who assaum for bingo method by which expenses are documented. In the rase of bingo, gars receipts " ergF h Prsn who assouw#6 far ethef must be compared to the checkers' records for the occasion by a perso n who did revenues Of Lawf;4074 U4 shau not sell cards for the occasion. Se arat e records must he ke t for bi o and all _ _ -�_ _ -C - _-n g- — - be Preoerved for three years. The Jaw ewtwscement.agency of the lisensiag other forms of lawful gambling. Changes or additions are indicated by underline, deletions by FtfikeeW. Changes or additions are indicated by underline, deletions by r.+rike«+w. �t 618 '• LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1984 Ch. 502, Art. 12 • Ch. 502. Art, 12 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1984 • 619 suth4it5, &hail have the authority to inveAtigate the binge FOGOWA of an OFgaw►Za- kOOwingly cwttceal a ntateFial fact in the stawRew AhaA be Fubjest to the lion at .any FeaFOnable bolts. AFgawiaations AhaA stake available theiF bingo penalties provided in cim-644 349 22 FesOMA fOF iFweA�iga1loon upon PFOPe (44) Any hm" agreemeniA FSqUiFed by Dawn 4476, ChaptoF 246 eaasuted All lawful amblin conducted t a licensed organization must be under by the ofgawiastiww in regard to PFerniAeA 1e8111ed (W the cendttet Of btnge the supervision of one or more gamblin managers. A gamblin manager Compensat t_o persons ion who participate in the conduct of lawful gam designated ty an organization to supervise a amblin occasion is responsible for blip may be aid onl to active members of the conducting organization or its the gross receipts from the occasion and for its conduct in compliance with all —g —Y — � — laws and rules. An organization may designate a different person t_o act a_s auxiliar , or the spouse or survivin spousC of an active member, except that manage r for each �of law ful amblin conducted. Each person designated as nonmanagement assistants who are not active members or sLxt may be hired us a amblin manage must give a fidelit bond in the sum of$10,000 in favor of to assist in the conduct of lawful amblin in nonmanagement ipos lions if g---g -� g— - —y — — — — approve h a ma ont of the organization's members. the organization conditioned on the faithful performance of the manager's duties, 1'L— - - jorit — — and the terms of the bond must rp ovide that notice be iven t_o the board in The amounts of compensation which may be Enid under this section must writing not less than 30 day- before its cancellation. be provide for in a schedule o_f compensation adopted q the board t rule. In A -mblinB manager adho�ng the schedule the hoard _must consider the nature of the participation and person may got act as a ag for more than one the type of lawful gambli n participated in. organization. Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 1982. section 349.21, is amended to read: A licensed organization paw a percentage of the gross receipts from rae ticket sales to a nonprofit organization which sells tickets for the licensed ffl .•349.21- -REPORTS t REPORTING AGENCIES organization- — - COMPENSATION. Sec. 16. [349.211] PRIZE, IAM1TS. It�3' �y found '` amF;t►nt Subdivision 1. BINGO. Prizes for a single bingo game ma not exceed Fese►ptA for 4•binge-essaF+ctn aA deieFFn+ned by the checkers FeseFds and the $100 except prizes for a cover-all game, which may exceed 5100 if the aggregate 8fg0k!nt..Of.•gFesA• s as downuined 4 ioialtng the ceAh p! and the value cif all cover-all rp izes in a bid occasion does not exceed $500. Total $iFePansy eACeeds i2A, the diASFePensy Ahab.be Fepocted to and investigated by prizes awarded at a boo occasion may not exceed 52,500, unless a cover-all the l�cetttar+g au+heFFy' et the Place where the btngO OssaFtOa waA held game is played in which case the limit is $3,0()0. For purpose o_f. this An OR Ahall Y to i" membership subdivision, a ccrvcr_all game is one in which a Ip ayer must cover all spaces greAA FeseiPtA treat binge, its pFOfuA tram bingo and the distribution of thoAe cxcert a single free s ace to win.— — -- - — PFaGtF itemised ar.Fe�utFed by Fi@G&iOR 349.20 Suhd. 2. BINGO CUMULATIVE-PRIZES. A prize of !!p to $1.000 Suhd 3. At team 3A days pFieF to condtcting itA first bingo ossasion of may be awarded for a single bingo game if the prize is an accumulation of prizes the Year and on an annual h" !hereatter, an organisation shaA We with the not won in games m previous h�o occasions. The total amount awarded in ka<al gever-Am@At unit which FegalateA its eOntlust GOpi'A Of the teAwwiwg+ cumulative prize in a� calendar dear may not exceed $12.000. For bin o occasions in which a cumulative rp izc is awarded the aggregate value o_f rp ize (� AePaFtlnent Of the 1FeaAaF31 internal Fevetttte Aervtce, 144eturn of which may he awarded for the occasion is increased �y the amount of the AFganiaaiiOw BAempt treat IwcOM TaAr FOFrn 'QA,OF a eomPORIble ktrm if the cumulative nze s„ awarded less $1(X). — — — OFgawiaatien iA Y@gUiFed to 1:90 the tOFOF wish the depaFtment of the treaAUFy; ---- I' — —— -- Subd. 3. OTHER GAMBLING. The hoard �y rule shall establish a (3>l»eParts PAP Of the tFeaAary, internal revenge ser-wre, Orgawt- schedule of prize limits for all other forms of gamblin consistent with the nation DifidAe66 IwcOM TaAr Fenn 999 T. OF a swa►pasable fOFai if the purpose 5 set out in section 349.11. The schedule may include daily and annual OFganiaatien iA F89U-Fed to file the fO4*R with the departrnettt of the may' Sze limits and prize limits for each game, raffle or operation of a gamblin (s�A "Statedaewt et 13tago Operations in the foFm preASFibed by the kwal device. - — — gOveseu+ental unit. A41 iAf0FMA1i0n contained in the ctawmewt sha4 be true, Suhd. 4. PRIZE VALUE. Merchandise rp fires must be valued at their ceFFect, and cernplete to the bem of the knowledge of the portion Of peFAons fair market value. For purpoSCS of sections 349.11 to 349.22 rp izes" do not signing the statement..Any person who Ah"knovwingI teaks a falAe Ftatetttent OF include free plays awarded. — - — — Changes or additions are indicated by underline, deletions by AtF+keeat. Changes or additions are indicated by underlin e. deletions by Ftrakeeut. 620 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1994 Ch. 302, Art. 12 Ch. 502, Art. 12 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1984 621 Sec. 17. [349.212] TAX IMPOSED. Subdivision I. BINGO. Bin o may be conducted without a license and Subdivision L. RATE. There is hereb imposed a tax on all lawful without complying with sections 349.17, subdivision L and 349.18 if it is amblin conducted by .licensed organizations at the rate specified in this conducted: subdivision. The tax imposed by this section is in lieu of the tax imposed by 1 to connection with a county fair, the state fair,or a civic celebration if section 297A.02'and of all local taxes and license fees. it is not conducted for more than 12 consecutive des in a calendar year; or : . On all lawful• amblin the tax is ten percent of the gross.receipt e of a (2j by an organization which conducts four or fewer bingo occasions in a licensed organization from lawful gamblin less prizes actual) Laid out payahle calendar year. the organization. Subd. 2. RAFFLES. Raffles may be conducted an organization as Subd. 2. COLLECTION; DISPOSITION. The tax must be paid to the defined in section 349.12, subdivision 13, without complying with sections 349.11 board at-time-, and in a manner the board prescri bes !!y rule. The proceeds, to 149.213 if the value of all raffle prizes awarded ty the organization in'a along with the revenue received from all license fees and other fees under sections calendar year does not exceed $750. Merchandise prizes must be valued at their 349.11 to 349.21 and sections 16, 17, and 18 of this article, must be Cid to the fair market value. state treasurer for deposit in the eg neral fund. Subd. 3. RAFFLES,CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS.The provisions of Subd. 3. ANNUAL APPROPRIATION. At the end of each fiscal year, sections 349.21 and 349.21 I, subdivision 3, and the membership requirements of the commissioner of finance shall SSqjfy to the state treasurer the total revenues sections 349.14 and 349.20 do not apply to raffles conducted �y an organization collected q the.board from taxes and fees imposed ty this article minus the which direct!y or under contract to the state or a political subdivision delivers amount appropriated by law from the eg neral fund to the board for its expenses health or s(wial services and which is exempt from taxation under section and operations. The net revenue so certified shall be expended §y I�gislative 501 c 3 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended through December appropriation to the department of education for expenditure, in consultation 31, 1993, if the mazes awarded in the raffles are real or personal rp operty donated with the stale arts board, as rg ants for programs, construction, maintenance, and by an individual, firm, or other organization. The person who accounts for the operation of !Inc or more schools for the arts located within the state, or the gross receipts, expenses, and rp oftts of the raffles may be the same person who purposes recommended �y the Minnesota school for the arts plannin task force accounts for other funds of the organization. except that-ate p rt of the amount so certified which is not appropriated for the set forth in this•subdivisian may be appropriated for an other ur use. Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.22, is amended to read: purposes - - - � _ - _Y p _Ix Sec: -1-8. [349.213] LOCAL AUTHORITY. 349.22 PENALTY. Vialatio of ' provision of Subdivision 1. LOCAL REGULATION. A_ statutory or home rule cam � � .�,a-ff �t stl� or count has the authority to adopt more stringent regulation of any form of �' i diction includin the inhibition of an form of Subdivision 1. GROSS MISDEMEANOR. .A�n other violation of sec- lawful amblin within its jurisdiction, --g - p - � - - _ - - lawful gambling, and 'require a permit for the conduct of gamblin exempt lions 349.11 to 349.214 is a gross misdemeanor. from licensin under section 349.214. The authority rg anted by this subdivision Subd. 2. OTHER ACTION.This section shah does not preclude civil or does not'include the authority to require a license or permit to conduct ag_mblin criminal 'actions under other applicable law or preclude any agency of govern- organizations.licensed by the board. ment from investigating or prosecuting violations of the provisions of Dews 1476, Subd. 2. . LOCAL APPROVAL. Before issuing or renewin an organiza- I Chapies 261 sections 349.11 to 349.214. County attorneys have primary respon- tion license, the board must notify the c�council of the statuto or home rule sibilit for r<p �secuting violations of sections 349.11 to 349.214,but the attorney city in which the organization's reP miles are located or, if the rep mises are eg neral may prosecute �IU violation of those sections. located ouiside.a cif � the count board of the count where the rep mises are Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.31;: subdivision 1, is located. If the EU'1 .council or county board adopts a resolution disapproving the amended to read: license and so informs the board within 30'days of receiving notice of the license, the license may not be.issued or renewed. Subdivision I. INTENTIONAL POSSESSION; WILFUL KEEPING. The intentional possession or wilful keeping of a gambling device up" a" on a Sec. 19. [349.214] EXEMPTIONS. licensed premises is cause for the revocation of any license under which the -Changes or additions are Indicated by underline, deletions by srfikeo w I Chanites or additions are indicated by underline, deletions by sadkeout. 622 • LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1984 Ch. 502, Art. 12 Ch. 502, Art. 13 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1984 0 623 licensed business-is carried on upon the premises where the gambling device is manufacture, sell or offer for sale a gambling device to the or and found, provided that possession of gambling deviser romm+nly kwwwn as '!pad- pari-mutuel belling on horse racing may be conducted under chapter 240. O PP rl in dlevwhPAN- OF " " (4W asri-) Sec. 24. APPROPRIATION, sonduGi i;g Father caw the pr.@MiFeF of a RORPaafa4 0Fg844M4i00 and OPeFaled by Organixa4i6m; licansed foF rush OPeFa4iOn PIRMUanl tO restican 3`9{26 CMuipmenl as There is appropriated from the eneral fund to the charitable ag mbling defined in section 34Q.12, subdivision 17, which is used for gambling licensed control board for the period beginning the d� following final enactment of this the charitable. ambling control board and the manufacture of gambling devices article and !n June 30, 1985, the sum of 1556,000, or so much thereof as is for use.injurisdictions where use of the gambling device is legal as provided for necessar to carry out the.put" of this article. by section 349.40 shall not be cause for revocation of a license. Sec. 25. REPEALER. Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 1983 Supplement, section 609.75, subdivi- Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 349.26, is repealed. sion 3, is amended-to read: Sec. 26. EFFECTIVE DATE. Subd. 3. WHAT ARE NOT BETS. The following are not bets: Sections 7 and 24 are effective the d_y following final enactment. All (1) A contract to insure, indemnify, guarantee or otherwise compensate I other sections of this article are effective March 1, 1985. All licenses issued 4 another for a harm or loss sustained, even though the loss depends upon chance. local units of government under Minnesota Statutes 1982, sections 349.16 and (2) A contract for the purchase or sale at a future date of securities or 349.26 expire on February 28, 1985. other commodities. (3) Offers of purses, prizes or premiums to the actual contestants in any bona fide contest for the determination of skill, speed, strength, endurance, or ARTICLE 13 quality or to.the bona fide owners of animals or other property entered in such a LOCAL PROVISIONS contest. Section I. Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 458.14, is amended:to read: (4)The game of bingo when conducted in compliance with sections 349.11 458.14 RIGHT TO LEVY TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS'FORBIDDEN. to-349.23: . (5) Subdivision 1. TAX LEVY BY CITY. The.port authority shall have no A private social bet not part of or incidental to organized, commercial- right or authority to levy any tax or special assessment,nor to pledge the credit ized, or systematic gambling. of the slate, or any other subdivision or municipal corporation thereof; nor to (6) The operation of a gambling devise equipment or the conduct of a incur any obligation enforceable upon any property, either within or without the raffle ar defined in Fesliww 340.26 under sections 349.11 to 349.22, by an port district, other than property owned by the port authority. Annually, at organization licensed foF m" Operation bay a !deal Unit Of 90ver"wwa PUFOaaaw4 such time as may he fixed by charter, resolution, or ordinance of the city in and to section 340.36 t the charitable gambling control board. for which any such port authority is created, the port authority shall transmit to the council of such city a detailed estimate, in writing, of the amount of money (7) Pari-mutuel betting on horse racing when the betting is conducted which in its opinion will be required for the business and proper conduct of its under chapter 240. affairs during the next ensuing fiscal year, in excess of any expected receipts from Sec. 23. -Minnesota Statutes 1983 Supplement, section 609.761, is I the conduct of its business, or other sources, and any such city, in addition to all amended to read: other powers now possessed thereby, and in addition to, and in excess of any limitation upon the amount it is otherwise permitted by law to levy as:taxes, w 609:761:OPEPATIONS PERMITTED. h@F , gFented the powi and auiho isy, in its to shall, at the request Notwithstanding sections 609.755 and 609.76, a f1FACOMal. FeligiOUR, ve4eF- of the p rt authority, levy taxes for the benefit of, and for'expenditure by; such am of Othff newPFOfai an organization may set ap er. Operate a gambling dowse port authority, not exceeding in any one year an amount equal to a tax of lave OF senduct a FaMe conduct lawful gamblin as defined in section 340 26 349.12, if Owe hawdFedihs Of one will .75 mill upon the dollar of the assessed valuation licensed by the legal Unit of goveFwmewi charitable gamblin control board and thereof, upon all the taxable property in such city, excluding money and credits, conducted under-ser.6on 349 26 sections 349.11 to 349.22, and a person may and any amount so levied for such purposes shall be paid over by the city Changes-.or additions are indicated by underline. deletions by m*ikeeu4. I Changes or additions are Indicated by underline; deletions by 40heow. C I T I C F S T A N. T H C N Y L I E U U R P/ E 9/12/d4 A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E PAGE 1 VENDOR CHECK CHECK CHECK ' NG. TYPE LATE NO. AMOUNT 04009 AETNA LIFE 6 CASUALTY R 9/ 12/84 04567 288. 00 04015 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CC R 9/ 12/84 04568 243 .13 i 04055 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING R S/ 12/84 04569 263.40 04106 J 6 U TRUCKING R. 9/ 12/84 04570 19C67. 00 0412: EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CU R 9/ 12/84 04571 14, 804.65 j 04145 GANZEk CISTRIBUTORS INC R 9/ 12/84 04572 17,943.15 04174 GR IGG S BEER DISTRIBUTORS R 9/ 12/84 04573 59673.10 04195 HAPPYS POTATO CHIP CO R 9112/84 04574 139.52 04205 HOME JUICE CO R 9/ 12/84 04575 14.5(3 0421E JOHNSON PAPER E SUPPLY CO R 9/:2/84 04576 122 .79 04230 KUETHEk DISTRIBUTING CO R 9/ 12/84 04577 321,085.29 C4250 LY STADS R 9/ 12/84 04578 71. 14 04265 MARK VII SALES .INC R 9/12/84 04579 28, 189.93 04270 PELS VAN—O—L I T E R 9/ 12/84 04580 1 12.79 04253 MINN BAR SUPPLY R 9/ 12/84 04581 80.7.49 04335 P40RTHERN STATES POWER R 9/ 12/84 04582 2, 127 .49 04345 CLO GUTCH FOODS INC R 9/ 12/34 04583 91.08 04355 PEPSI COLA/7 UP BOTTLING R 9/12/84 04584 21061 .67 04370 PIONEER DETECTIVE AGENCY R S/ 12/84 04585 177.4.5 44374 PCFCORN, UNLIMITED R 9/ 12/84 04586 152.00 04378 PROFESSIONAL PROCESSING P, 9/12/84 04587 64.26 04390 REX DISTRIBUTING CO k 9/ 12/84 04588 219066.58 0435: RGYAL BEVERAGE LIST CO R 9/ 12/34 04589 6C6.00 04396 ROYAL CROWN BEV R 9/ 12/84 0:590 456.20 G4434 SOLTHSIDE DISTRIBUTING CC R 9/ 12/ 84 04591 452.70 C445C STL'ART DISTRIBUTING' CG R 9/ 12/84 04592 683 .75 04471: T0MBS TON E PIZZA k 1/ 12/84 04593 140.75 0447 T�% [N CITY FEDERAL R 9/ 12/84 04594 20.00 044 b0 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE R 9/12/84 04595 42 .00 04491 UNITED WAY r 9/ 12/84 04596 18.00 044S? i%Gk MARKETING F 9/ 12/84 04597 31 .20 06155 TRI STATE BEVERAGES R S/ 12/84 04593 765 .30 06212 STATE ACY REVOLVING FUND k 9/ 12/ 34 04599 33.58 06213 SUBURBAN LAt-. ENF ASSCC R 9/12/84 04600 40 .00 TYPE TOTAL 130 ,848.97 TGTAL 130,848.97 s 's i •1 a i '+ CITY OF ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA September 25, 1984 1 . Call to Order. 2. Roll Call . 3. Approval of September 11 , 1984 H.R.A. Minutes. 4. Claims. a. 0. J. Janski & Associates - $450.00. 5. Adjournment. 9 7 1 5 - CITY OF ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES September 11 , 1984 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sundland at 8:59 P.M. Present for roll call : Sundland, Vice Chair Enrooth, Secretary/Treasurer Marks, and Commissioners Ranallo and Makowske. Also present: David Childs, Executive Director; William Soth, Attorney, John Arkell and Steve Yurick, Developers for the Kenzington Condominiums; and Richard Krier, Consultant. Motion by Commissioner Ranallo and seconded by Secretary/Treasurer Marks. to approve as submitted the minutes of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting held August 28, 1984. Motion carried unanimously. The developers told the H.R.A. members construction on the condominium project had been delayed by the last minute withdrawal of construction financing by the Rothchilds Company, even though that firm had submitted a letter of commitment- to the project and had instructed the developers to proceed with construction when the project was over 50% sold. Mr.. Arkell indicated he perceived all lenders have become • very apprehensive about financing -condominiums because so many of these projects' have gone sour nationwide. Applying this experience to the Kenzington was completely unjustified in the eyes of the developer because he perceives the project should be a "piece of cake", with 60 units already sold and 59 of these to be paid in cash. Mr. Arkell said he is also frustrated by the lender's objections to "contingency sales" since he had been able to inform them that Edina Realty was guaranteeing to purchase any homes which did not sell at market value. Another strong plus for the project, the developer said, is the fact that all subcontractors are committed to the project and Kraus Anderson had agreed to early construction. Mr. Yurick told the H.R.A. members none of the buyers had been lost by the delay and eight of those who had already sold their homes have made some very creative arrangements for residency until the condominiums are available. The developer indicated he has been in close contact with all the buyers and believes those who have not sold their homes are convinced February and March would be better months than November and December for the sale of their property. Chairman Sundland and the Secretary/Treasurer both stated they perceived the . H.R.A. is very committed to this project, considering themselves partners in the endeavor; and had no interest at this time in calling in Arkell 's Letter of Credit. Com- missioner Ranallo inquired of- the developers whether there was anything further the H.R.A. could do to assure the success of the project. The developers were requested to continue to keep them closely apprised of their progress in finding a funding source. Mr. Arkell indicated he was certain this would be attained within thirty days. • Mr. Krier .reminded the H.R.A. members that he had war.ned .them at.the outset that there 'might:. be .many ups and downs before the project was accomplished. He cited other projects which have taken a lot longer; Riverplace,, which..is only 50% sold _2_ after two years; 'a project in southeastern Minneapolis, which had been -in the works for,over four years; and what is 'considered to be a highly successful endeavor in Richfield, which took two and one-half years -before -construction.. The consultant indicated he was very optimistic that H.U.D. would select the City's senior housing 202 proposal later that month, which could have a very positive effect on the condominium development and would enable the H.R.A. to get on with the commercial -redevelopment portion of the Kenzie Terrace Project. Mr. Krier indicated he perceived there was a unique situation in St. Anthony where the purchased housing project had been so supportive of the subsidized project, which had made quite an impression on H.U.D. officials. Because of these factors, and the fact that he agrees with Mr. Arkell that the Kenzington "is one of the best projects he has ever worked on", the consultant advised the H.R.A. not to be too concerned about the setbacks at this stage of the project development. The Attorney was requested to review the terms of the Letter of Credit held by .. Arkell . Mr. Soth indicated the expiration date is December 1 , 1984 and he perceives no action on the part of the H.R.A. is necessary at this time. He added that it is the developers' responsibility to notify the H.R.A. 30 days prior to the expiration date if they intend to replace that document. Motion by Secretary/Treasurer Marks and seconded by Vice Chair Enrooth to adjourn the meeting at 9:37 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, • Helen Crowe, Secretary Mr. Richard Krier Derrick Land Company C.Ij ; e,' + 1 1984 1650 Shelard Tower Minneapolis , MN. 55426 September 10 , 1984 (Originally billed March 28 , 1984 ) For Professional Services : $450 . 00 Inspection of the Property and TW[cb Cr Real Estate Appraisal Report Reference : Restaurant Property south of Kenzie Terrace St. Anthony Village Shopping Center Owner : Max Saliterman F OJJ/EDH-10112 • K , t { DORSEY & WHITNEY MEMORANDUM A Pel_na 1-1-m9 P,of__,Cp[D+a none 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402 TO: William R. Soth 510 NOW"CENTRAL LIFE TOWER (512)340-2600 B TNIAO STREET NORTH W MINNESOTA STREET GREAT FALLS.MOMMA 59AOI ST AUL,MIN NE40TA SBIOI TELEll:29-0605 Imzlzn-eoiT TELECOPIEA:1&21340-2B5B (A0e)TZr-3e3z FROM: Becky A. Comstock P.O.BOY BAB SUITE an NORTH 3+o FIRST NAnoMAL awA euaO1M° WILLIAM R,SOTH.P.A. IWO N STREET M.w. ROCMESTE6,MINNESOTA5590] wASHINoroN,Dc.zoo3e DATE: September 14, 1984 150)1288-]IDB (612)3.40-2959 (202)955-1050 313 IIRST NATIONAL DA NN BUILDING 30 AUE LA BOLTS WAYZATA,MINNESOTA 55391 T50 o8 PARIS,FRANCE RE: City of St. Anthony: Water Contamination Litigation (012)4)5-03]3 011 331 552 32 50 September 19, 1984 Mr. David M. Childs INTRODUCTION City Manager Pursuant to your request, on Tuesday, August 21, City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road 1984, I met with John Drawz and Michael Nash, attorneys for Minneapolis, Minesota 55418 the City of New Brighton. The purpose of the meeting was Re: Water Contamination to discuss the litigation they have commenced on behalf of Dear Dave: the City of New Brighton because of the alleged contaimination Enclosed is a memorandum from Becky Comstock regarding the water contamination litigation. I am also enclosing a state- of groundwater by the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) ment from John Drawz for his fees for a meeting with Becky. in their community. With limited time available, I discussed As you will see from the memorandum, it may be neces- sary for St. Anthony to give certain notices and to either with Mr. Drawz and Mr. Nash our concerns relating to various commence an action or join the New Brighton action in order to preserve its rights against these defendants. statutes of limitation and St. Anthony's need to determine Please let me know whether you have any questions whether it will intervene in the action commenced by the or comments regarding the memorandum, or whether you would like any additional information included. If not, I would appre- City of New Brighton or commence its own action. Mr. Drawz ciate it if you would distribute copies to the Councilmembers. was willing to answer specific questions but did not volunteer Ver ly yours, information nor offer any research memoranda prepared by his office. Wi R. Soth WRS:ln The Complaint filed by the City of New Brighton, a copy of which is attached, names as defendants the United encs. States, United States Department of Defense, the United States Department of the Army, Federal Cartridge Corporation, Honeywell, I DORSEY & WHITNEY A AVrnaMIP..1l,din9 P,013-ibR GP.DaeUf in any other litigation related to the same facts. This Inc., Donovan Construction Company of Minneoota, Minnesota memorandum will address generally each of the claims for Mining and Manufacturing Company, Walburn, Ltd., the Minnesota relief brought by the City of New Brighton and any statute Transfer Railway Company, Norton Erickson, Sylvester Bendel, of limitation problems related thereto which the City of Hyme Friedman, and Neal Armstrong. These parties are entities St. Anthony must consider at this time. The pertinent statutes which have either owned the property underlying the TCAAP, are attached to this memorandum. operated the TCAAP, been a tenant on the property or owned CLAIMS FOR RELIEF the Butcher's Spur property or operated a hazardous waste I. FEDERAL LAW CLAIMS facility thereon. The Complaint recites the facts upon which A. Com rehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601 the action has been brought, including the contamination et seq. of New Brighton city wells by various hazardous substances, The Complaint states a claim for relief under § allegedly the result of operations at the TCAAP facility 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Butcher's Spur. The Complaint includes ten claims for and Liability Act (CERCLA), commonly known as the federal relief and seeks $8 million together with costs, attorneys' Superfund statute. Under § 107 of CERCLA, the owner or operator fees and disbursements, as well as equitable, injunctive of a facility, any person who owned the facility at the time and declaratory relief. hazardous substances were disposed of there, any person who Also attached is a copy of an Order consolidating by a contract agreement or otherwise arranged for the disposal, New Brighton's case with an action filed on behalf of a number treatment or transport for disposal or treatment of a hazardous of individuals living within close proximity to the TCAAP substance to the facility, and any person who accepts or who allege personal injury and property damage as a result accepted any hazardous substance for transport to a disposal of contamination from the TCAAP. facility from which there is now a release or a threatened If the City of St. Anthony decides to commence release of hazardous substances is liable for all costs of its own action or intervene in the action of the City of removal or remedial action incurred by the United States New Brighton, it will be necessary to research in more detail or a State, not inconsistent with the National Contingency the claims brought by New Brighton, which likely would appear Plan, any other necessary response costs that are incurred - 2 - - 3 - t � by any other person, such as the City of St. Anthony, and any research memoranda or other documents on which it based any damages or injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural this interpretation. Further, the City of New Brighton had resources. asked the Justice Department to prepare a Stipulation Agreement Pursuant to § 112(d) of CERCLA, a claim for removal promising not to assert the statute of limitations against or remedial action or for damages to natural resources cannot St. Anthony if they delayed bringing their lawsuit. The be presented to the federal Superfund for payment nor may Justice Department never did produce any memoranda nor the an action be commenced for "damages", defined in CERCLA, requested Stipulation Agreement. Section 101(6), as natural resources damages, unless the Based on the foregoing, under CERCLA, caution suggests claim is presented to the Superfund or an action commenced that a three (3) year statute of limitations be observed within three (3) years from the date of discovery of the and that a civil action be commenced under CERCLA within loss, or the date of enactment of the statute, whichever three (3) years from the date of discovery of the loss in is later. This statute of limitations provision contains order to preserve the claim. no specific limitation with respect to a claim to recover B. Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 remedial or removal costs, commonly referred to as clean-up The City of New Brighton has also brought a claim costs, in a civil action. The attorneys for the City of against the United States and its departments under the Federal New Brighton believe this gap in the statute may invite a Tort Claims Act, Title 28, U.S.C. § 1346, for injury or loss statute of limitations problem for potential plaintiffs who of property caused by the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions seek to recover clean-up costs. of any employee of the government while acting within the The United States Department of Justice had attempted scope of his or her office or employment. In this case, to urge New Brighton not to bring their lawsuit when they the City of New Brighton has alleged that employees of the did on the basis that CERCLA contained no statute of limitations United States, while acting within the scope of their employment, for clean-up costs and therefore, the six (6) year statute negligently or wrongfully stored, disposed of, or permitted of limitations that applies to all other federal claims, the storage or disposal of hazardous waste at TCAAP, for namely, Title 28, U.S.C. § 2401(a), applies. The City of which the United States is liable under the Federal Tort New Brighton had asked the Department of Justice to produce Claims Act. t I , 1 - 4 - , - 5 - iel e 1 i i 1 Pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. § 2401, a tort claim C. Resource Conservation Recover Act (RCRA), Section 7002 against the United States is barred unless it is presented Section 7002 of the Resource Conservation Recovery in writing first to the appropriate federal agency within Act (RCRA) provides that any person may bring a civil action two (2) years after the claim accrues, or unless an action against any other person, including the United States, any is begun within six (6) months after the date of mailing other governmental instrumentality or agency, to the extent of the notice of final denial of the claim by the agency permitted by the Constitution, who is alleged to be in violation to which it was presented. Title 28, U.S.C. § 2675 states of any permit, standard, regulation, condition, requirement that an action may not be instituted upon a claim against or order which has become effective pursuant to RCRA. No the United States for money damages for injury or loss of action may be commenced, however, until sixty (60) days after property caused by the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions the plaintiff has given notice of the violation to the Adminis- of any employee while acting within the scope of his or her trator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, employment unless the claim has first been presented to the to the State in which the alleged violation occurs, and to appropriate federal agency and finally denied by the agency any alleged violator of such permit, standard, regulation, in writing. If the agency fails to make final disposition condition, requirement or order. Further, no such action of the claim within six (6) months after it is filed, the may be commenced if the United States or the State has first claim is deemed denied for purposes of undertaking litigation. brought a claim in a court of the United States or a State Based on the foregoing, the City of St. Anthony, to require compliance with the permit, standard, regulation, before bringing an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, condition, requirement or order. If such an action has been must give notice of its claim to the United States Department commenced in a court of the United States, any person may of the Army within two (2) years after the claim accrues. intervene as a matter of right. The City of New Brighton If the claim is denied in writing by the Army, an action has brought a claim under § 7002 of RCRA on the basis that must be commenced within six (6) months after the date that the defendants' disposal of hazardous waste at TCAAP and the notice of denial has been mailed to the City. If the Butcher's Spur constitutes a violation of environmental quality Army does not respond, the claim is deemed denied at the standards, regulations and orders within the meaning of the end of six (6) months and an action must be commenced within statute. six (6) months thereafter. - 6 - 7 - There is no statute of limitations in RCRA with and adversely affects the environment. The City asks for respect to bringing an action under Section 7002. Thus, declaratory and equitable relief in the name of the State the six (6) year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) of Minnesota against the defendants in order to protect water, is applicable. The City of St. Anthony must, however, give land and other natural resources from pollution, impairment the required sixty (60) day notice to the United States Environ- or destruction. mental Protection Agency, the State of Minnesota and any MERA contains no statute of limitations. Minn. alleged violators prior to commencing the action. Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(2) provides, however, that where II. STATE LAW CLAIMS liability is created by statute, an action must be commenced D. Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA), within six (6) years, unless a shorter provision is provided. Minn. Stat. Chapter 16B Based on the foregoing, the City of St. Anthony has six (6) The Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA), years from the date of discovery of the pollution, impairment Minn. Stat. § 116B.03, authorizes any person residing within or destruction to bring an action under MERA. the state, or any political subdivision of the state, including E. Minnesota Environmental Res onsibilit and the City of St. Anthony, and others, to maintain a civil Liability Act MERLA , Minn. Spat. Chapter 15B action in the district court for declaratory or equitable The Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability relief in the name of the State of Minnesota against any Act (MERLA), Minn. Stat. Chap. 115B, is commonly referred person for the protection of the air, water, land and other to as the Minnesota Superfund statute. Minn. Stat. § 115B.04 natural resources located in the State from pollution, impairment provides that any person who is responsible for a release or destruction. Please note that the statute provides for or threatened release of a hazardous substance from a facility declaratory and equitable relief and does not contemplate is strictly liable, jointly and severally, for all response a money damages award. costs incurred by the state, a political subdivision of the The City of New Brighton alleges in its Complaint I ; state, or the United States and all reasonable and necessary that the defendants' conduct violates state environmental response costs incurred by any person as well as damages quality standards, regulations, and rules and materially 8 - - 9 - i i , ' E for injury or loss of natural resources. Under Minn. Stat. § 115B.05, the person responsible for the release of the r Based on this section, the City of St. Anthony ti hazardous substance is also strictly liable, jointly and 4 has six (6) years from the date the cause of action accrues i severally, for damages for death, personal injury or disease or the date of discovery of the injury or loss to bring a and economic loss resulting therefrom. In its Complaint, claim under MERLA. the City of New Brighton alleges that the defendants are III. COMMON-LAW CLAIMS the persons responsible for the release of hazardous substances I F. Strict Liability within Minn. Stat. §§ 115.04 and 115B.05 of MERLA, and that The City of New Brighton has additionally plead the City has incurred response costs for which the defendants several common law claims, including the defendants' strict are liable as a result of the release of these hazardous liability for non-natural, abnormally danagerous, or ultra- substances by the defendants. hazardous activities at TCAAP and Butcher's Spur. The Complaint MERLA contains a statute of limitations, found alleges that the defendants have caused damages to the City in Minn. Stat. § 1158.11. Under that provision, no person for which they are strictly liable for maintaining these may recover, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 115B.01 to 115B.15, ultra-hazardous activities. unless the action is commenced within six (6) years from Minn. Stat. § 541.01 provides that actions can the date that the cause of action accrues. In MERLA, the only be commenced within the periods described in the statute statute further states that in determining when the cause after the cause of action accrues, except when a different of action accrues for an action to recover damages for death, limitation is prescribed by other statutes. (These limitations personal injury or disease, the court is to consider the apply to actions by or on behalf of the state and its political following factors: (a) when the plaintiff discovered the subdivisions, including the City of St. Anthony.) The precise injury or loss; (b) when any personal injury or disease has statute of limitations that would apply to property damage sufficiently manifested itself; (c) when the plaintiff discovered based on common law claims under Minn. Stat. Chapter 541 or using due diligence should have discovered the causal is not entirely clear. connection between the injury, disease or loss and the release Minn. Stat. § 541.05 provides a six (6) year statute of a hazardous substance. of limitations for trespass upon real property or for any - 11 - 10 - liability created by statute. The six (6) year statute is that their conduct constitutes a nuisance because the City also applied to any injury to personal property, but there has suffered a substantial interference with the free use is no other provision related to damage to real property. and enjoyment of its land. The nuisance claims are based Minn. Stat. § 541.07 provides a two (2) year statute of limi- I on two statutes, namely Minn. Stat. § 561.01 and Minn. Stat. tations for torts, such as strict liability, resulting in § 115.071, but also can be based on common law. The first personal injury, but contains no provisions with respect authorizes any individual to bring a private nuisance action to property damage. Because the statute is not specific and the later authorizes the enjoining of a public nuisance. with respect to the application of the two (2) year statute There is no statute of limitations in the nuisance statutes; of limitations, it would appear that the six (6) year statute therefore, presumably the six (6) year statute of limitations will apply. found in Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(2) will apply. G. Negligence I. Trespass The City of New Brighton alleges in its Complaint The City of New Brighton has also asserted a trespass that the defendants were negligent in the storage and disposal claim, namely that defendants' activities at TCAAP and Buther's of hazardous waste or in permitting the storage and disposal Spur have caused contaminants to migrate into the City's of hazardous waste at TCAAP and Butcher's Spur. They claim water supply, unauthorized by the City, which has caused that the defendants had a legal duty to exercise reasonable damages. care in all phases of the disposal of hazardous waste and As noted previously, Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1, that their failure to conform their conduct to the standard creates a six (6) year statute of limitations for a trespass resulted in actual injury and damage to the City. upon real property. The same statute of limitations questions exist J. Riparian Rights for bringing a negligence claim as for the strict liability The City of New Brighton asserts in its Complaint claim discussed above. It appears that the applicable statute that the defendants have breached their duty as riparian of limitations is six (6) years. owners to make reasonable use of the groundwater also used H. Nuisance The City of New Brighton has brought public and private nuisance claims against the defendants asserting - 13 '- - 12 - t s �. •—. _ ....__.._ter. t E after the prescribed period has run are generally denied. by the City of New Brighton for its water supply and have Et` Limitation periods commence when the cause of action accrues. unreasonably and improperly interferred with the rights of A cause of action "accrues" as soon as the right to institute i the City in the use of that water. and maintain a suit arises, namely, at such time as it can i The statute of limitations concerns outlined above 4 be brought in a court of law without dismissal for failure in the strict liability section also apply to the claim for to state a claim. Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. damages as a result of interference with riparian property 147, 158 N.W.2d 580, 584 (1968); Karjala v. Johns-Manville rights. Presumably, the six (6) year statute of limitations Products' Corp., 523 F.2d 155, 160 (8th Cir. 1975). will apply. Federal courts have generally held that a cause STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS MATTERS of action accrues at the time of the plaintiff's injury. The statute of limitations of greatest concern United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 120 (1979). The to the City of St. Anthony will be that created by the Federal Eighth Circuit United States District Court, which includes Tort Claims Act described above. A tort claim must be presented Minnesota, has, however, declined to follow an all-purpose to the federal agency under the statute within two (2) years test to determine when a cause of action accrues. In Korgel after the claim accrues. Other statutory and common law v. United States, 619 F.2d 16, 19 (8th Cir. 1980), the court claims, such as the possible three (3) year statute of limi- suggested that if a plaintiff discovered or in the exercise tations under CERCLA, and the six (6) year statutes under of reasonable diligence, could have discovered the basis MERLA and common law claims, will also be triggered by the for a cause of action, then the appliable statute of limitations date that the claim accrued to the City of St. Anthony. would run. In a footnote, the Korgel court also noted that, Only MERLA gives any guidance in determining when a claim "In the context of tort claims for seepage of water or oil, accrues, and in that case, only provides that the claim for courts have typically concluded that the cause of action injury, death or disease will be deemed to accrue when the accrues from the date of the injury or from the date on which plaintiff discovered the injury or loss. the injury became apparent or discoverable by due diligence." Statutes of limitation prescribe a period within 619 F.2d at 18 citing Maher v. Cities Service Pipe Line Co., which a right may be enforced. Requests to enforce a right 286 F.2d 313 (10th Cir. 1960). - 14 - - 15 - `" 1 The Eighth Circuit's flexible interpretation of of 1981, the City of New Brighton was advised both of the when a cause of action accrues has been followed in other ! presence of. contaminants in its city wells and the recommendation jurisdictions and is generally employed when the nature of that certain wells in the City be closed. Thus, in their the injury is such that there are no immediate manifestations case, their cause of action clearly accrued in the summer of damages on which to seek redress. In• such 'instances, of 1981 when they received a letter from the Minnesota Department courts look not to the 'date of injury, but rather to when of Health advising them of the contaminants and the need the plaintiff had reason to know that. he had been injured. to close the wells. In St. Anthony's case, the City received Portis v. United States, 483 F.2d 670 (4th Cir. 1973). This notice in the summer of 1982 that low level volatile organic rule does not, however, allow one who knows that an injurious compounds were found in Well No. 3. In early 1984, perhaps tort has been committed against him to delay in filing a March, the City received a letter from the Minnesota Department suit until the time, however long, that the precise extent of Health recommending that Well No. 3 be removed from service. of damages are known. The running of a statute of limitations However, since October 1983, the City has not used Well No. does not await a determination of the full extent of injury. 3 due, apparently, to the increasing levels of volatile organic 483 F.2d at 673. In fact, for purposes of determining when compounds. the statute of limitations starts to run, damages are no Based on the foregoing, the date St. Anthony's longer speculative when there is enough evidence to allow cause of action accrued may be the date on which it received the issue to go to the jury . . . even though better evidence notice that its wells had become contaminated, namely the of damage might become available at a later time. Monona summer of 1982, or the date on which either the City ceased Shores Inc. v. United States Steel Corporation, 374 F. Supp. to use Well No. 3, namely October 1983, or the date the Minnesota 930 (D. Minn. 1973). Department of Health recommended that the well be removed Based on the foregoing, the City of St. Anthony's from service, namely, early 1984. cause of action accrued when it first discovered or through It is reasonable for St. Anthony to treat October due diligence could have discovered its groundwater contamination 1983, when it first ceased to use Well No. 3 and damages i problem. The experience of the City of New Brighton is somewhat j manifested themselves, as the date its cause of action accrued, distinct from that of the City of St. Anthony. In the summer + rather than the date it received the Minnesota Department 1 16 - j - 17 - t • .. ,y„� 1 > , .err � ---r-(^�.-'-"-- , i of Health letter recommending that the well be closed. In for relief outlined above, only two statutes provide a possible that event, a claim by the City of St. Anthony under the basis for St. Anthony to recover its attorney fees in this Federal Tort Claims Act must first be brought to the Department ; litigation, namely, CERCLA and MERLA. of the Army by October 1985. Once the claim to the Department Under CERCLA, Section 107(a) allows a plaintiff of the Army is made, St. Anthony should expect to commence to recover "all costs" and "any other necessary costs of i suit within six (6) months of bringing such claim. Likewise, response" which are the result of a release of hazardous the three (3) year statute of limitations that might be asserted substances. Although Section 107(a) does not specifically under CERCLA should be kept in mind since the City would provide for attorney fees, in United States v. Northeastern have to assert its CERCLA claim by October 1986. Further, Pharmaceutical & Chemical Company, Inc., 579 F. Supp. 823, before bringing any lawsuit under RCRA, St. Anthony must 850-851 (W.D. Mo. 1984) the court held that the United States give sixty (60) days prior notice to the Environmental Protection was entitled to recover its attorney fees as well as other Agency, the State of Minnesota and any alleged violators. administrative costs in cleaning up a hazardous waste site. Because the City of St. Anthony has incurred damages This decision is an isolated opinion which may be rejected like, but much smaller than those of the City of New Brighton, by other jurisidictions. It is also unclear whether the it would be most efficient and cost-effective for the City reasoning in this case would be extended by another court of St. Anthony to simply intervene in the action of the City to award attorney fees to plaintiffs other than the United of New Brighton. The City of St. Anthony must, however, States or a state. intervene in a timely fashion so as not to have any of its Although the issue of a plaintiff's right to attorney claims barred by the statute of limitations. Conversations fees is still open to question under CERCLA, in MERLA, Minn. with the New Brighton attorneys suggests that the City of Stat. § 115B.14, a prevailing party in an action brought New Brighton is anxious to have St. Anthony intervene in under the statute may be awarded its costs, disbursements this action. and reasonable attorney and witness fees. Since any lawsuit ATTORNEYS' FEES AND LITIGATION EXPENSES brought by the City of St. Anthony will likely assert a claim A plaintiff is only allowed its attorney fees incurred under MERLA, the City should be able to recover its attorney in litigation when a statute so provides. In the claims fees in any such litigation. In most cases, however, the amount of attorney fees recovered is usually less than that expended. - 18 - - 19 - �► give sixty (60) days prior notice to the Environmental Protection CONCLUSION I Agency, the State and any alleged violators. The City of St. Anthony may bring various claims If St. Anthony decides to commence litigation, for relief against responsible parties for contamination I it would be most efficient and cost effective to intervene of its groundwater and the loss of its Well No. 3 under federal in the action of the City of New Brighton, rather than commencing I and state statutes and common law. St. Anthony must, however, a separate action. assert its claims for relief under the statutes and common I law before the applicable statutes of limitations have run. i BAC:kll Attachments A statute of limitations will begin to run from the time the cause of action accrues, or from the time a plaintiff discovered or in the exercise of reasonable deligence could have discovered an injury or damage forming the basis for a cause of action. Since St. Anthony ceased to use Well No. 3 in October 1983, it is reasonable to assume that the statute of limitations began to run at that time, although a court may find the cause of action to have accrued when St. Anthony first learned that its wells were contaminated, namely the summer of 1982. Based on the statutes and common law claims discussed above, St. Anthony must give notice of a potential claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act within two (2) years of when its cause of action accrued and expect to commence suit within six (6) months thereafter. Further, before a suit is filed that includes a claim under RCRA, St. Anthony must I i - 20 - 21 - r p SEP 1 y ;;� 7 50 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TELEPHONE 484-3771 o Seville MINNESOTA 55113 1 I 1 .m•nwo...o 1 I September 14, 1984 j I Mr. Dick Nowlin Larkin, Hoffman, Daly G Lindgren Ltd. ` 1500 Northwestern Financial Center -----`— 7900 Xerxes Avenue South — .ose_uc=-- _ Minneapolis, MN 55431 _ I I•. I� F Dear Mr. Nowlin: The Roseville City Council, at its September 10 meeting, referred SITE the Petropolitan Recovery Corporation's request for amendment to the zonong ordinance to the October 3, 1984 Planning Commission meeting, and established the Council public hearing for October 8, 1984. Both meetings will be held at 7:30 p.m, at the Roseville City Hall Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville, Minnesota. It is I o, important that you or a representative of the Metropolitan Recovery �- Corporation attend both meetings. If you have questions concerning your application, please contact i Ie me. iV(1st Sincerely, Ron ldoorse Administrative Assistant I 1 —J 1.— —.J— /• enrw•�4r1ve b I RNI:be North .�� CENTRAL PROCESSING& — — .mob• TREATMENT FACILITY • ROEIMLLE.MWNESOTA 1 0 00 200 C00 rt \ _. m..• .1 METROPOLITAN RECOVERY CORPORATION i' DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) 9/24/84 NOTE TO REVIEWERS: Written comments should address CUSTOMERS/MEMBERS OF the accuracy and completeness of the EAW information, THE METROPOLITAN RECOVERY CORPORATION potential impacts that may warrant investigation and/or the need Lor an EIS. Such comments must be submitted to the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) during the 30 day period following notice of the EAW's Advance Circuits, Inc. availability in the EQB Monitor. Contact the EQB (612/296-3985) or the RGU to find out when the 30 day Advanced Flex, Inc. Aeroscientific Corp. comment period ends. Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. !i Aztec Electronics, Inc. i INSTRUCTIONS: Guidelines for assisting in completion Barrel Finish, Inc. f of this worksheet may be obtained from EQB. Provide Century Circuits all information which is reasonably accessible. Circuit Science, Inc. Attach additional sheets if necessary. EXPLAIN ALL t ANSWERS. Cooperative Plating Co. Electro Mold Corp. Electronic Industries, Inc. —--- Bureau of Engraving, Inc. Gopher Plating, Inc. ( 1. Project Name: Central Treatment and Recovery Facility Hard Chrome, Inc. Micom Corp. 2. Proposer: Metropolitan Recovery Corporation NiCO Plating Co. Contact Person: Gary G. Dodge, Vice President Precious Metal Platers, Inc. Address: 3512 Edmund Boulevard Precision Plating, Inc. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406 Pro-Tech, Inc. Phone: (612) 724-0126 Stylmark Inc. Superior Plating, Inc. 3. RGU: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Twin City Chromium Plating Co. Contact Person: Marlene Voita Universal Circuits Inc. Address: 1935 West County Road B2 Metal Coating Company Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Superior Plating, Inc. Phone: (612) 296-7796 Awardcraft, Inc. Electro-Plating Engineering Company, Inc. 4. Project Location: Northwest 1/4 of Section 8, General Fabrication Corporation RSP Plating, inc. Township 29, Range 23 West a. County Name: Ramsey City Name: Roseville b. Attached are the following: 1. A county map showing the general area of the project. Attachment 1. 2. A copy of the USGS indicating the sFecific boundaries and topography of the project site. Attachment 2. 3. A site plan. Attachment 3. J 4. A zoning map of the area. Attachment 5. chemical recovery, metal precipitation, acids and bases neutralization, filtration, and sludge thickening. Cyanide 5. Aerial Photo of area. Attachment 6. { removal will be accomplished with a cyanide oxidation process. After metals removal, wastewater from these 6. Traffic Report. Attachment 7. j processes will be treated further by clarification and neutralization, and multimedia or sand filtration. (Refer 7. Waste Board Facility Description. to Attachment A for a detailed process description.) 5. Describe the proposed project: ' It is expected that 108 to 258, by dry metal weight, of the incoming metal waste will be recovered for reuse. The Metropolitan Recovery Corporation (MRC) is proposing to Nonhazardous waste, primarily zinc, will constitute construct a central treatment and recovery facility. This approximately 308, by dry metal weight, of the incoming facility would process solid wastes, liquid wastes, and ion processed wastes. Approximately 758 of the total incoming • exchange resin canisters containing cadmium, chromium, wastes will not initially be amenable to recovery. These copper, lead, zinc, nickel, and other metals generated by will be processed into inert solid residuals, mixed metal, metal platers, printed circuit manufacturers, and other dewatered sludges, or neutralized. Solid inert substances metal finishing businesses (metal finishers) primarily S generated, if nonhazardous, will be disposed of at sanitary located in the metro area, and recover metals and metal landfills' in Minnesota. Mixed metal sludges and organic precipitates for sale and reuse. Unrecoverable wastes materials will be disposed of at approved out-of-state would be transformed into solids to 'be disposed in approved hazardous waste facilities, or at approved solvent and oil landfills. Organic liquids and sludges will be stored for recovery facilities. transshipment to appropriate out-of-state treatment and disposal facilities. The facility would be located in The facility will dispose of approximately 80,000 gallons Roseville at Walnut Street and Rose Place on an undeveloped of wastewater per day (assuming a 28-shop case) into the industrially zoned (1-2) site. (See EAW Figures 1-4 for municipal/metropolitan sewage treatment system. wastewater the project location.) will be pretreated at the facility to ensure compliance with applicable industrial wastewater effluent require- The facility is being proposed to help metal finishing 3 ments, including the local pretreatment limitations for the shops, particularly the smallest shops who may not be able I { metropolitan disposal system for metals, and cyanide to afford any type of treatment, to comply with MWCC and concentrations, wastewater pH, and any applicable federal federal pretreatment regulations which restrict metal waste regulations for wastewater discharges. discharges into the sewer system. These regulations took effect on April 27, 1984. The facility is the outcome of a The facility will also serve as a collection station for feasibility study conducted by the Resource Recovery Task small quantities of organic wastes. These wastes will be Force, a group formed by the Metropolitan Council and the combined with like wastes destined for similar final Twin Cities Association of Metal Finishers in April of l treatment or disposal, and shipped in full truck load 1982, which included MPCA and Waste Management Board staff. quantities to their.final destination. This capacity will The Task Force studied the feasibility of a central assist small and intermediate quantity generators which facility to treat metal waste generated in the metro area. constitute a high percentage of all generators in. as Minnesota. As of August 30, 1984, 28 out of a possible total of 96 ; Twin Cities metal finishers and electroplaters have The drum storage area will be capable of holding a maximum contracted to utilizing the proposed central facility. of 1,500 drums at one time; the expected average being Other companies included in the 96 have expressed interest about 1,000. The storage area floor will be a continuous in utilizing the facility once operation can be demon- concrete pad, elevated in the center and sloping down on strated. The potential customer market is much larger than both sides to form two separate areas for handling the 28 contracted firms. incompatible wastes. Drums will be grouped according to method of final processing indicated by the generator on The facility will be operated as a Minnesota corporation, the manifest or bill of lading. The building will have a The 28 participating metal waste generators own stock and truck access opening and will be equipped with safety will have rights regarding the facility's operation. showers, fire detectors and extinguishers, a sprinkler system, two sumps, and other safety features required by Processes to be used at the facility to remove metals from regulation. the incoming waste feed stock will include ion exchange, activated carbon adsorption, chromium reduction, electro- 2 3. . ti :'•idt Wastes brought to the facility will be tested for agreement State: with manifest description and suitability of the final processing method indicated by the generator on the Minnesota Department Treatment Facility To Be Submitted manifest. Only compatible wastes will be placed in the of Energy and Construction Loan same area. Partial drums of the same waste material may be Economic Development combined to make full drums. Drums of the same liquid waste may also be combined in bulk storage tanks. Waste Management Waste Processing Submitted Shipments to final hazardous waste management facilities Board Facility Develop- will be arranged as soon as sufficient quantities are ment Grants accumulated. significant since water- Minnesota Pollution Hazardous Waste Pro- To Be Submitted Process air emissions will not be si 9 i Control Agency cessing Facility Permit based, not organic solvent-based, processing will occur at the facility. However, an air emissions control unit and r Local: operating permit may be required for the facility if venting to the outside air is to occur or if a boiler is Metro Waste Control Industrial waste Water To Be Submitted installed which exceeds APC-3 requirements. Determination Commission Discharge Permit of the need for an air quality permit will be made after completion of the design specifications for the facility. Ramsey County Hazardous Waste To Be Submitted A storage and loading/unloading/unloadin area containment system Transportation, Storage, 9 4 4 Y and Processing License will be constructed to hold spills and leaks. The floor under the storage containers will be impervious to contain City of Roseville Zoning Amendment Submitted leaks and spills and will be adequately sloped and have Special Use Permit To Be Submitte sufficient capacity to contain the volume of the largest Building Permit To Be Submittea container or 108 of the volume of the containers located in the storage area. It will also contain a sump or 12. Is the proposed project inconsistent with any: collection area to prevent overflow of the containment system. - a. Adopted land use ordinances? 6. Reason for EAW preparation: Mandatory Category X No Yes MEQB Rule t: 6 MCAR $ 3.038.0.2 requires MPCA to prepare an EAW for new hazardous waste processing facilities The project is located in a General Industrial 7. Estimated construction cost: $5,000,000 District (I-2) in the City of Roseville. A zoning amendment and special use permit authorizing this 8. Total project area (acres): Four specific type of industrial use are necessary. 9. Industrial building size: 60,000 square feet b. Adopted comprehensive land use plans? X No Yes 10. Number of proposed parking spaces: 35 11. List all known local, state, and federal permits/apFrovals/ C. Local, state, or federal resource management plans? funding required: X No Yes Level of Government Type of Application Status If yes, explain: Federal: .13. Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. Environmental Hazardous Waste Recy- To Be Submitted Protection Agency cling, Treatment, and The site has never been developed. It is the only Storage Facility undeveloped parcel in this area. Neighboring industrial Permits activities include: solvent storage and sales, ware- housing, forest products manufacturing, petroleum tank farm, and food processing, all in the I-2 zoned district. 4. 5. 1 14. Approximately what percent of the site is in each of the Identify water body and applicable state classification(s): following categories? (Percentages should total 1008 before and after construction.) Before After I ' Forest/Wooded OS 08 19. Describe any physical alteration (e.g. dikes, excavation, fill, stream diversion) of any drainage system, lake, Brush 08 0% stream, and/or wetland. Estimate quantity of material to Grassland 09 08 be dredged and indicate where spoils will be deposited. Cropland 08 08 Urban vacant 1008 368 None. Wetland (types 3-8) 09 09 Impervious Surface 08 30% 20. Will the project-require an appropriation of ground or Other (Building) 08 348 surface water? X No Yes 15. Show the type and location of soils on the site map. Give Explain (indicate quantity and source): the SCS soil classification types, if known. J The Ramsey County Soil Survey classification is 860c, Urban j Land-Hayden-Kingsley complex, 38 to 158 slopes. Nearby well logs indicate clay and sand and gravel surface, with 21. Will the project affect: area characterized by clay to 12 feet. a. Surface water quality (on or off the site)? 16. Does the site contain peat soils, steep slopes, sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, abandoned wells, or any X No Yes geologic hazard? X No Yes Explain: b. Groundwater quality (on or off the site)? X No Yes C. Groundwater levels in any wells (on or off the site)? 17. What is the approximate depth (in feet) to: y X No Yes a. groundwater: 130' min. 140' avg. static water level : in well pump data Explain both during and after construction including any discharges expected. b. bedrock: 120' min. 130' avg., Plattville limestone j The paved truck parking and unloading area will have storm 18. Does any part of the project area involve: water drainage facilities which connect to the municipal' storm water drainage system. The on-site system will a. Shoreland zoning district? include gates and traps to enable the diversion of surface liquids into internal sumps and control equipment if a X No Yes spill occurs. b. Delineated 100-year flood plain? 22. What type of waste water treatment will be used? X No Yes X municipal individual (on-site) other C. State or federally designated river land use The facility will discharge approximately 80,000 gallons of district? waste water per day into the municipal metropolitan sewage disposal system. Waste water will be pretreated at the X No Yes facility to ensure compliance with applicable industrial wastewater effluent requirements. 6. 7. i t b. A rare, endangered, threatened, or special concern 23. Describe and indicate on a site map the provisions to species? (animals and/or plants) control erosion and stormwater run-off. Include size and X No Yes location of any retention basins, and discharge point(s). No erosion or sedimentation run off is expected. C. Movement of any resident or migratory animals? 24. Will the project generate: X No Yes a. Air pollution? X No Yes Explain (Identify species and describe impact): b. Dust? X No Yes C. Noise? X No Yes 27. Do any historical, archaeological or architectural d. Odors? X No Yes resources exist on or near the project site? Explain both during and after construction, identify X No Yes distances to noise sensitive land uses, and quantity and type of air pollutants. Explain (show resources on a site map and describe impact): Dust and noise will be generated only during construction. There are no discharges to surface or groundwaters. All 28. Will the project cause the impairment or destruction of: water discharges are to separated storm or sewer lines. The facility will produce limited air emissions. a. Designated park or recreation areas? 25. Describe the type and amount of solid waste and/or X No Yes hazardous waste that will be generated and the method and b. Prime or unique farmlands? location of disposal. The facility will process incoming wastes not amenable to X No Yes recovery into either inert solid residuals or mixed metal sludges. In the event that these wastes are processed into C. Ecologically sensitive areas? fixed solids, approximately 800 tons of solids in the form of inert blocks composed of cement and other fixation X No Yes substances combined with trace amounts of mixed metals will be generated annually as a processing residual. In the d. Scenic views and vistas? alternative, if these wastes are processed into sludges, X No Yes approximately 400 tons of partially dewatered mixed metal sludges will be generated annually as a process residual. e. Other unique resources (specify)? Solid inert substances generated will be disposed at sanitary landfills in Minnesota. Mixed metal sludges will X No Yes be disposed at approved facilities located in other states. Explain: See Table I, Al2.5 in Attachment A. 26. Will the project involve: a. Fish or wildlife habitat? 29. What roads will receive increased traffic? (For each road indicate the current average daily traffic (ADT) and X No Yes increase in ACT contributed by the project.) 8. 9. It is estimated that there will be approximately 15 �I � incoming truck trips per day. The attached traffic report, Attachment 6, shows that the Project would have a negligible effect on traffic even if the incoming volume were to increase three-fold. rt 30. Are adequate energy sources and utilities now available to _ �- service the project? No X Yes - If not, what additional u-tTlities will be required? t -7--` SUMMARY OF ISSUES List the issues as identified by "yes* answers above. Discuss alternatives and mitigative measures for these FFF issue. O Ep ! ! 0 CERTIFICATION BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I hereby certify that the information contained in this document is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I that co ies of the completed EAW have been made available to ;irrr-i f all points on the official EQB distribution list. �j �O Signature Date � Title y I - I ;I t. 10. ,...... ............. ..... ..... ..... ..... i Y .,r _ .-- ._.... . •.•.• 'na an\.I31.1L�V 1 4 nl Lnl.ill•181V'a' ° " /`��� s� hark;;; `,� - �� ;' J° BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES P J-••• ® ` TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS • J I � ; •O ` �� 'O ,� I 7901 FLYING CLOUD ORIVE,SUITE 118/EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55344/(812)944-7590 �•�:"� 90c 906 f September 6, 1984 REFER TO FILE:83-34-26 /; .. U r o • I o y r a ►t u' r ` �y7 MEMORANDUM �I l i HsY ! TO: Gary Dodge, Metropolitan Recovery Corporation Pa 0A ° FROM: James A. Benshoof�At SUBJ: Traffic Information Related to Proposed Central Treatment and Recovery Facility (1 N y • ••• 0 1 w N INTRODUCTION � ra •_� 'M• ° Z . ° In response to your request, this report provides traffic w information as input to the Environmental Assessment o x i :`�' Worksheet (EAW) that you are preparing for the proposed I . ,.. r a " + �+ FT °-' Central Treatment and Recovery Facility. Specifically, the 01 'u q j,� 4 purpose of this memorandum is threefold: 36 __ •' �' 1) To describe the volume and routing characteristics of o �• truck traffic generated by the proposed development. R 2) To indicate the existing total traffic volumes on routes e.5p :, ••• 9 that would be affected by the projected truck traffic to/from the proposed development. 3) To assess the ability of the public roadway system to 3 c9'' •.� accommodate the projected development truck traffic. U . J / o As you have indicated, the proposed development would be a o ;° .. ••• I newly constructed facility on the south side of Rose Place, 1 �. . .�..... ....� .., a short distance from the intersection of County Road C and Walnut Street in the City of Roseville. CENTRAL PROCESSING A wimm TREATMENT FACILITY ROSEVILLE,MINNESOTA Station 8 Towamd 29 Range 23 =__/1 4 1/2 mY. 500 loam t tTIIO.OUT.IG RRCOVIAT CORPORATION 7/10/04 Mr. Gary Dodge -2- September 6, 1984 Mr. Gary Dodge -3- September 6, 1984 VOLUME AND ROUTING CHARACTERISTICS OF TRUCK TRAFFIC GENERATED ABILITY OF ROADWAY SYSTEM TO ACCOMMODATE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC BY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The projected truck traffic as a percentage of existing total As you have indicated, it is expected that the proposed deve- traffic volume is tabulated below. This information, lopment would generate approximately 100 truck trip ends per together with the truck routings to be used, is shown in day - 50 arriving at the site and 50 departing from the site. Figure 1. Since all the trucks operating to and from the facility would be under contract/lease by your company, you would have New Truck Trips control over the routings that would be used. The intent in Projected Existing as a Percentage defining routings to be used is to recommend routes that pre- New Daily Volume of Existing Total sently carry a large volume of truck traffic and furthermore Roadway Location Truck Trips 1983 Traffic Volume to avoid usage of streets with abutting residential use. In this context, the primary routes that will be designated for I-35W T.H. 88 East 45 69090 .065 truck trips approaching the site will be to/from the north on to T.H. 280 I-35W (about 25 trips per day), to/from the west on I-35W (about 45 trips per day), to/from the south on T.H. 280 I-35W T.H. 36 North 15 68750 .022 (about 15 trips per day), to/from the east on T.H. 36 (about to County Road C 15 trips per day). I-35W County Road C 25 63840 .039 For trips to/from the north on I-35W the designated routing North to T.H. 88 will be I-35W, south to County Road C, west to Walnut Street, south to Rose Place. and east to the site. For trips to/from T.H. 36 I-35W east to 15 50530 .030 the west on I-35W the designated routing will be I-35W, east T.H. 51 to Industrial Blvd., north to Walnut Street. east-northeast to Rose Place, and east to the site. For trips to/from the T.H. 280 I-35W south 15 40430 .037 east on T.H. 36 the designated routing will be T.H. 36, west to I-94 to I-35W, north to County Road C. west to Walnut Street, south to Rose Place, and east to the site. For trips to/from Co. Rd. C I-35W west to 40 15000 .27 the south on T.H. 280 the designated routing will be T.H. T.H. 88 280, north to Terminal Road, west to Walnut Street. north to Rose Place, and east to the site. The proposed routings Walnut St. Industrial Blvd. 45 2170* 2.1 avoid streets with abutting residential use. north to Terminal Road Walnut St. Terminal Road 60 2680* 2.2 i north to Rose Place j Terminal Rd. St. Croix St. 15 960* 1.6 west to Walnut Street St. Croix St. T.H. 280 north 15 4700* .32 to Terminal Rd. * Values are from 1979 1, E AVE. N E I cn 'v Mr. Gary Dodge -5- September 6, 1984 AVE N E Q c 7 25 V ° (.04%) 88 W The above data confirm that the new daily truck trips will i pTER. CR have virtually no effect on the total traffic. In addition, o ? ) x ¢ o the new daily truck trips are such that they will have negli- ' : ac��°; = r. 40 46 Z gible effect on the existing truck traffic. For example, (0.21%) Q° A. - County Road C presently has 860 truck trips per day. The 1WUE`'fs o V 23 R �. projected new daily truck trips (40) represent just a 4.6 A percent Increase over the existing truck traffic. GRAI z 136 E In light of these facts: 1) The small number of new truck e - 94 ..,.ON' 1 B• " OAKCREST trips generated by the proposed development, and 2) All of N Le these trips would be directed along routes that presently Site 151 carry a large volume of truck traffic, it is concluded that i 60 z 35w (:02X) the public roadway .system will effectively accommodate the projected new truck trips with no adverse effects. 15 (1.6%) 78 W. 1 �. AL k'0. 0 C a 15 - (.03X) w 4 - cn z ' 0 > d 1 Z Y w T_ F 0 36 I G - ,n 45 = LEGEND (2.1%) ,.. vmz� Routes Used by Truck Trips To/From Site 15 45 New Daily Truck Trips } KWT. ( 280 (.04%) c Generated By Development (.06%) Percent Of Existing Total O a�� Daily Volume 4 5(.D6%) RAG •V( t 5 114 °' 0 1000, Approx. Scale METRO RECOVERY CORPORATION FIGURE 1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR CENTRAL TREATMENT AND• DISTRIBUTION OF TRUCK RECOVERY FACILITY TRIPS GENERATED BY 3ENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT ATTACHMENT 7 Attachment A J FACILITY DESCRIPTION Metal plating and metal finishing, including printed circuit fabrication and protective coating applications, are important to industry in the Twin Cities area. Products from these metal coating firms are used by many of the area's manufacturing businesses. Provision of these essential product treatments contributes to the Twin- Cities' prominence in electronics and computer related manufacturing and associated high tech industries. There are 94 companies engaged in some form of metal finishing business in the Twin Cities. Attachment A Waste metals occur as process residuals from metal finishing. FACILITY DESCRIPTION Federal water pollution control laws now limit the discharge Central Treatment and Recovery Facility of these toxic metals as sewered chemical wastes. Electroplating, printed circuit shops and metal finishing firms forced to comply with pretreatment standards established under Prepared for: the Clean Water Act, are now faced with a choice between two basic pretreatment methods for removing their toxic metal MINNESOTA WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD discharges from their wastewater. It is noted that in-house Treatment and Processing Facility Grants Program water reduction measures, waste reduction and improved 'housekeeping" measures are inherent to both of these basic methods: - In-house pretreatment using conventional systems which chemically reduces chromium, oxidizes cyanide, and Prepared by: precipitates heavy metals as hydroxide sludges for disposal as a hazardous waste, and METROPOLITAN RECOVERY CORPORATION Centralized treatment and recovery which allows for optimal September, 1984 recovery of metals (primarily through the use of ion exchange technologies) through improved economies of scale. A centralized facility provides more feasible access to secondary material markets, it allows generators to avoid costly hazardous waste land disposal costs, and it provides for a greater resource pool to. fund necessary research activities and capital investments. I ° Twenty-eight metropolitan area companies have joined together to develop a centralized treatment and recovery facility (the i ; Facility) for managing their residual waste water discharges. The Metropolitan Recovery Corporation (MRC) is the business i entity established to develop the Facility. A-1 7 FACILITY CONCEPT E g� t ►Y • The six heavy metals used by electroplating and printed circuit S �, board firms which are currently discharged into the sewer and g 0 are now subject to pretreatment standards are copper, chromium, 8:: g �"1 77 nickel, cadmium, zinc and .lead. These metals along with $►J Sit o 8 cyanide, which is also present in some of these waste waters, will be treated at the Facility so that participating firms can comply with discharge regulations. A preliminary Facility concept has been developed as part of a proposal submitted by MRC to the MWCC, as well as the °po conceptual feasibility work done for the Metropolitan Councils' Resource Recovery Task Force. While certain ; q. o• components of the Facility's scope may change as a result of C o e: • ; pilot scale testing and preliminary design work, major = �e components described in this section are expected to be incorporated into the Facility's final design. c Explicit in the Facility's design is treatment and recovery. The treatment technologies include those processes which render f ca the aqueous inorganic wastes received by the Facility more e amenable to recovery, less expensive to handle and/or less z o 0 hazardous to manage. The use of these treatment processes may occur as in-plant modifications in the electroplating or H printed circuit- shops participating in the project, or done at the Facility itself. The recovery systems, on the other hand, are those processes designed to extract raw materials (chrome, nickel, zinc, etc.) from appropriately treated wastes. A general process flow sheet is presented in Figure 1. This c �o shows the overall relationship of the incoming feed stocks to ;� �• the Facility's various treatment technologies and recovery • systems. The incoming feedstock includes ion exchange �g canisters, metal-specific waste water solutions (batch dumps) and solids (metal-specific and mixed metal sludges). The following individual treatment and recovery systems that are to = be involved in the proposed Facility are described in detail. _ m • Ion Exchange e . o nH The ion exchange process is a stoichiometric chemical reaction whereby an ion from a solution is exchanged for a similarly charged ion that is attached to an immobile solid particle. s ` These particles make up a granular solid called an ion exchange resin. This process is utilized in the metals pre-treatment a "' process to concentrate the metals present in the waste water at p: the plant so that transportation of the metals to the Facility - for recovery will be more economical. Ion exchange may also be used to treat spent plating baths as an end of pipe treatment but its greatest value is in the recovery applications. A-2 • r o`v Z C 1 OUTLET 790-4 Hose Barb 790-5 Aluminum Nut Ion exchange resins are classified as`cati'on or anion 790-6 Tee`apRing exchan era. Both t s are roduced from the same basic 3J4-I.D.HOSE 7907 Fill Cap`O'Ring 4 types P 4 790-8 Bushing`O`Ring organic polymers. The chemical behavior of the resin is 790.10 907 Distributor determined by the particular ionizable group attached to the 79011 13/16'x.4"ABS resin. The following is a list of five resin -types that may be 9 790-12 906 Distributor used by the Facility for metals along with the important 780.13 Shipping Cap characteristics of each. 1 6 9 6 .. 4 3/4"I.D.HOSE 13 1. Stron Acid Cation - The important characteristics .of this 2 res n type are.: The exchange. capacity is .not affected by the pH of the solution, it is the least expensive resin, INLET SHIPPING'. it is the most durable and its selectivity is low so it CAPS may pick up hardness in the water. d 17 13 2. Weak Acid Cation - Important characteristics are: The �t 6 exchange capacity is reduced at a solution pH below 6, it 2+h`-8 THREAD will tend not to pick up water hardness because the 8 selectivity for heavy metal is higher and it is a more expensive resin than the strong acid but a smaller amount n of reagents are needed to reverse the reaction and regenerate the resin. ;L 10 3y 1-U.FT. 3. Strong Base Anion - Important characteristics are: The ? CMB-11 exchange capacity is unaffected 'by solution pH, it is generally more expensive than the cation resins, it has a shorter functional life span than cation resins and the resin can be fouled by organics in the solution. 11 + 4. Weak Base Anion - Important characteristics are: The 54" exchange capacity is reduced above a solution pH of 7, i;� 13"NOMINAL I.D. the resin cost is the same as the strong base anion, and less reagent is necessary for resin regeneration than for the strong base anion resin. FIBRE-GLASS IaI TANK 5. Heavy Metal Chelatin Resins - Important characteristics i 3.5 CU.FT. are: It has a higher se ectivity for heavy metals than INTERIOR does the weak acid cation resin so it can separate heavy a volume metals from high levels of water hardness in the 9 (structural Fibers, solution, reduced amounts of reagent are required for Inc. regeneration, it is the- most expensive resin type, and vessel-vinyester) removal of heavy metals. is effective above a solution pH of 4. 12 The ion exchange resins are housed in a canister which is attached to a drain pipe on the rinse tank (see Figure 2). The rinse solution flows through the canister, the metal is removed allowing the exiting water to flow to the sewer. when the .007"to.010"SLOTS exchange capacity of the canister (containing the resins) is IN DISTRIBUTORS. reached, it is replaced by a fresh one. Saturated canisters are transported to the Facility and regenerated. Regeneration is accomplished by flushing the resins with a concentrated acid or base solution, depending on the resin type, which effec- tively reverses the exchange reaction. — t PORTABLE O.I.UNIT A-3 Drawing of a typical enehange unit SCALE— DATE— DRAWING NO.— ,h.. The advantages of.the ion exchange treatment system are: the Activated Carbon Adsorption water savings are significant; the feedstream can be dilute as is the case in rinse waters; and the energy consumption is low. The plating baths in electroplating and printed circuit board The disadvantages are: capital costs are high; chemical, labor manufacturing shops normally become contaminated with a variety and maintenance costs are high; the equipment is complex; and of substances. The important contaminants of concern to the the performance of the system depends on the operator. proposed metals recovery system are those that adversely affect the ion exchange resins. These important contaminants include strong oxidants that may physically break down the resin, Electrolytic Recovery chelating agents and oils or other organics that may gradually k foul the resin and various suspended solids that may foul the This is a process in which there is an electrochemical i ion exchange column. reduction of metal ions to elemental metal. In the electrochemical cell a sufficient level of direct current Therefore, it is essential that these organic contaminants be voltage is applied across two electrodes, overcoming the removed from the waste water prior to the ion exchange reversible electromotive force of the cell, causing the metal treatment in order to preserve the longevity of the resins. ions to plate out at the cathode. The cathode is the electrode Activated carbon performs this required step by the process of at which electrons are taken up by the metal and reduction adsorption. occurs. The other electrode is the anode. Oxidation occurs here and electrons are given up to the electrode. There are three important steps in the process of adsorption of dissolved organics in the waste water by the granular activated The electrolytic recovery of metals has been proven technically carbon. First is the transport of the solute through a film on feasible by the primary and secondary copper industry. Copper the surface of the activated carbon granule to the exterior is purified using these electrochemical techniques. surface of the carbon. The second step is the diffusion of the Electrolytic recovery is also used to recover tin, silver, solute through the pores of the carbon to its interior. copper and other metals from plating and etching drag out Finally, adsorption of the solute occurs on the interior wastes in some electroplating plants. surfaces of the pore and capillary spaces of the activated carbon. Electrolytic recovery was chosen as the metal recovery process for the copper and cadmium wastes entering the Facility. The effectiveness of adsorption by activated carbon is Copper will be recovered using a large electrowinning tank dependent upon a number of factors. The physical and chemical while cadmium recovery will require a smaller plating cell. nature of the solution, the nature of the material to be adsorped, including its molecular size and polarity, the type Zinc and nickel waste streams are believed to be contaminated of contacting system (carbon column for example) and its mode with copper and other metals along with other impurities. The of operation, and the nature of the carbon itself. electromotive series position of nickel and zinc are higher than the contaminating metals so their recovery by this Activated carbon canisters would be used at the industrial electrolytic process is uneconomical. shops as a prefilter to the ion exchange system. At the Facility there will be two activated carbon columns installed The important factors which determine the efficiency of in series. At the Facility the main function of the carbon electrolytic recovery of metals are, water temperature, water would be to trap suspended solids and remove organics from flow rate, the current density and electrode area of the cell nickel and copper waste waters which arrive at the facility in (for plating), the type of metal and metal concentration in the bulk shipments. water, and the types of contaminants and their concentration in the water. Once the carbon columns have reached their capacity they must be replaced with fresh activated carbon columns. In order to There is also a possibility of reusing the spent electrolytic be disposed of they will first be dried and then incinerated. solutions as a regenerant solution for the ion exchange resins. The ash may then be disposed of in a sanitary landfill. Since no heavy metals are adsorped by the carbon, none will be present in the ash. A-4 A-5 Chromium Reduction A covered mixing tank with mixer is required for the reaction. The auxiliary equipment required consists of a mixing tank for Chromium exists in the hexavalent form in etching, plating and the sodium hypochlorite and the sodium hydroxide. chromating baths and rinse waters. Hexavalent chromium is much more reactive and toxic than the other forms of chromium. The individual shops will have a pretreatment system and the Hexavalent chromium must be reduced to the trivalent form in Facility will require an oxidation reactor with auxiliary order to be less toxic upon discharge of small amounts to the equipment. environment and to avoid destruction of the ion exchange resins. Metal Precipitation and Sludge Thickening To accomplish this reduction, an acidic solution of sulfur Soluble metal salts occur in plating bath dumps, etching bath dioxide or sodium bisulfate is reacted with the chrome dumps, metal finishing rinse waters and the ion exchange solution. Sulfur dioxide is often used to cure resins but it regenerant solutions. In order to be removed from the aqueous is more difficult to use than sodium bisulfite. Although solution, the metal salts must be converted to insoluble sodium bisulfate is slightly more expensive, it was chosen as hydroxides or sulfides. Sulfide precipitation removes more the more preferable reagent for chromium reduction. metal from the wastewater than hydroxide precipitation. This is why a two step process is used to remove the bulk of a metal The reduction reaction may take place in a simple mixing tank from solution as a hydroxide and then polishing the solution with mixer. An auxiliary mixing tank is needed for the sodium with a sulfide precipitation step. Hydroxide precipitation, as bisulfite and acid. a process, has a greater product flexibility and simpler discharge pretreatment requirements than sulfide precipitation. One chromium reduction system will be installed in each shop to For these reasons hydroxide was chosen as the precipitator for protect the ion exchange reins. There will also be one in the the Facility. Metal hydroxide sludges can be redissolved in Facility. acids and converted to more soluble forms for reuse. This cannot be done with metal sulfide sludges because of the danger Cyanide Oxidation of toxic hydrogen sulfide gas being generated. Also, the required treatment of wastewaters from hydroxide precipitation Cyanide destruction or removal is also required for the is a simple neutralization with an acid. The removal of excess wastewater to meet the MWCC pretreatment regulations. In order sulfide from the waste water may require air stripping which is to remove the cyanide for reuse it must be complexed and much more complicated and expensive. precipitated from the solution. This process, however, is very complicated and the cyanide may not be in a saleable form when The choice of base to add to the metal solution is an important recovered. Destroying the cyanide through oxidation to carbon factor affecting both the technical performance and the cost of dioxide and nitrogen is much more simple. the system. Calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide and sodium 3 hydroxide are all commonly used. Cyanide is used in plating solutions and ends up in the wastewater from electroplating and printed circuit board plants The precipitation of these metal hydroxides is not and is trapped by the ion exchange resins. The cyanide will instantaneous so proper equipment is required to ensure an subsequently occur in the ion exchange regenerant solution at adequate retention time for the settling to occur. The the Facility. The required oxidation reaction by which cyanide thickening of the sludge formed from the metal hydroxide is destroyed is performed by reacting sodium hypochlorite, j precipitation must also be facilitated by the equipment. Two chlorine or chlorine dioxide with the regenerant solution. standard circular clarifiers with rotating scrapers will be Chlorine is toxic, corrosive and difficult to control. It is utilized by the Facility. the least expensive of the three; however, the Facility and the individual shops are probably too small to take advantage of A flocculant will most likely be added to the clarifier to aid this lower cost. Chlorine dioxide is also dangerous to use in a more complete precipitation of the metal hydroxides. The because of its tendency to explode at 10°C, its boiling point. most common flocculants are ferric chloride, alum and a variety Sodium hypochlorite is only available in an aqueous solution, of water soluble polymers. however, it is the easiest of the three reagents to control. For this reason, sodium hypochlorite was chosen as the oxidizing reagent for cyanide destruction. Sodium hydroxide is also required as an additional reagent for the oxidation reaction. A-7 A-6 1 e Sludge Dewatering Cadmium Recovery The metal hydroxide sludges will have a water content of about Cadmium arrives at the Facility as cadmium cyanide complexes 95% when they come out of the clarifier. This water content is concentrated on ion exchange resins and bulk shipments of too great for the sludges to be suitable for sale or disposal. wastewater containing concentrated cadmium. The resin is These sludges, therefore, must be dewatered as much as possible regenerated with caustic soda and water then treated to oxidize before they can be stored, disposed of, or sold. the cyanide. The regenerant solution and the bulk shipments of wastewater are transferred to a small plating cell and the The conventional plate-and-frame filter press is the most cadmium is electrolytically recovered. Wastewater not effective filtration apparatus available. While other containing cadmium is neutralized, filtered and discharged. dewatering devices such as vacuum filters can only attain a water content of 70%, the plate and frame press can reduce Chrome Recovery water content from 95% to 50%. ; Bulk shipments of chrome in the hexavalent form are reacted Sludges that cannot be sold through the secondary metals market with sodium bisulfite for reduction to the trivalent form. will be fixated with a Portland cement mixture and disposed. ` Trivalent chrome is also concentrated on ion exchange resins. Portland cement is a good fixation agent and contingent upon k; The resin regenerant solution (produced by flushing with t caustic soda and water) and the reduced bulk shipment solutions he hazardous waste delisting procedure, the material produced may be disposed of in sanitary landfills. are treated by precipitation. The chrome hydroxide is dewatered and resold. Any waste waters from these treatment Copper Recovery processes that do not contain chrome are neutralized and filtered before discharge to the sewer. Copper will enter the Facility in five forms. Bulk shipments Zinc Recovery of concentrated copper in acidic wastewater are treated by electrolytic recovery. Bulk shipments of chelated copper Zinc cyanide complexes in bulk shipments of waste water and compounds in wastewater are first passed through an activated carbon column to remove the chelating agents and then are concentrated on ion exchange resins are treated to oxidize the treated by electrolytic recovery. Copper concentrated on ion cyanide after the resin is regenerated. The zinc is then precipitated as zinc hydroxide, fixated and resold or disposed. exchange resins during the treatment of copper wastewaters is flushed during resin regeneration with water, sulfuric acid and Wastewater generated during these treatment processes that does caustic soda. The resin regenerant solution containing copper not contain zinc is neutralized and filtered before discharge. is treated by electrolytic recovery. Copper cyanide complexes Nickel Recovery concentrated on ion exchange resins are treated in a similar manner. The resin is regenerated using caustic soda and water. The regenerant solution containing copper cyanide complexes is Nickel enters the Facility as nickel in acidic wastewater and treated with sodium hypochlorite and caustic soda to oxidize concentrated on ion exchange resin. The bulk shipments of the cyanide and then treated by electrolytic recovery. Finally electroless nickel are run through an activated carbon column bulk shipments of waste water containing copper cyanide to remove the organic chelating agents present. The ion exchange resins are regenerated using sulfuric acid, sodium complexes are treated to oxidize the cyanide and then transferred to the electrowinning tanks for electrolytic chloride and water. The regenerant solutions and bulk recovery. shipments of both types are treated by precipitating the nickel as nickel hydroxide, dewatered, and resold on the secondary Wastewater from any and all of these treatments is neutralized metals market. Wastewaters from these treatments, not and filtered to remove suspended solids before discharge to the containing nickel, are neutralized, filtered and dishcharged. sewer. Lead Recovery Any wastewater containing copper that is too contaminated for economical electrolytic recovery is precipitated as copper Bulk shipments of wastewater containing lead and a lead hydroxide and resold. hydroxide sludge generated during in-plant treatment are the two forms of lead arriving at the Facility. The lead is precipitated from the wastewater as lead hydroxide. Both sludges are dewatered and sold if possible. Fixation and disposal is the other alternative. Wastewater generated during A-8 these processes, not containing lead, is neutralized and filtered before discharge. A-9 TYPES, VOLUMES b DISTRIBUTION OF WASTES Proiected Maximum (from committed companies) - This category i_f . . represents the amount of.waste which could be.expected.from the . The facility will be'designed to manage aqueous inorganic Facility if all committed companies *se,nt,all.of the waste to wastes in general, and more specifically the aqueous and the Facility including batch dumps.. The exception to-this is, a. inorganic wastes generated-by electroplating., printed circuit i ;' - few committed companies who have in-house- systems and will not and other metal finishing -industries. be-using ion exchange canisters. Due to the initial price structure, several companies have chosen to.send-dilute rinse The general waste market potentially served by the Facility waters to the Facility via ion exchange canisters and- to treat includes Minnesota industries contributing to the 'heavy metal all batch dumps in-house. Since the original contract, a price inorganic solution and sludges" category identified in. the reduction has been implemented for batch dumps making_it more Board's Hazardous Waste Mana ement Report. According to this ; - attractive for these companies to send batch dumps to,-the data, 337 tons per year or o the state's total S Facility. The assumption that all batch dumps will be hazardous waste falls into this category. Through a market committed to the Facility may be valid for smaller shops assessment performed by MRC and Touche Ross Company, .6 million currently without. in-house treatment systems, however, for gallons of aqueous waste were identified as a potential market larger shops who-are planning to combine in-house treatment for the Facility. These wastes include spent acid and alkaline with the Facility, it may be unrealistic to assume that these solutions, mixed metal sludges, and other heavy metal ? companies would send all of their batch dumps to the Facility solutions. The source of this data is the MPCA/Hennepin County under the current price structure., A similar situation exists Hazardous Waste Management Information System. While all of for cyanide canisters. The end result is that the batch dump this waste could potentially be managed by the Facility, MRC j and cyanide canister estimates listed under the projected has evaluated the general aqueous inorganic waste market in maximum category are probably high since the Facility will have very broad terms. Additional analysis of the technical and' to significantly reduce its per unit fees to attract the larger economic aspects associated with these wastes represents a ? shops. significant component of the Facility's future development and marketing plans. Proiected Maximum (overall) - This category represents the amount of waste which is expected at the Facility if, in The -specific waste market-for which the Facility will be addition to the wastes in the projected maximum from in primarily targeted is the aqueous inorganic wastes generated by companies category, all companies in the metropolitan area send electroplating, printed circuit and other metal finishing j their sludges and batch dumps to the Facility. As described ' industries. There are 94 such firms in the metropolitan area above, this is probably unrealistic in terms of batch dump and 42 firms in the outstate area. Based upon MRC's original i1 quantities. Projected revenues from sludges, however, may be market assessment, as well as revisions made recently to more accurate since the Facility is currently offering a reflect wastes committed through user contracts, Table 1 has competitive price for sludge disposal. The projected maximum been developed to estimate and project the amount of wastes (overall) estimates do not assume any canister users from that may be managed by the Facility. It is noted, that due to non-committed companies. the proprietary nature of MRC's marketing and user contract data, only summaries are included in the Table 1 characterization of the Facility's primary market. it is also noted that the values in Table 1 have been developed in 4 categories as described below: Contractual Commitment - Guaranteed revenues based upon signed contracts with MRC. Anticipated amounts from committed com anies - Amount of waste expected at the Facility based on h stor ca effluent data, personal conversations and site visits. Due to the °put or pay" provisions in the contract, the contractual commitments are lower than the actual anticipated quantities. Therefore, this category represents a more accurate estimate of the waste which will actually be received by the Facility under current contractual commitments.. A-11 A-12 A a 4 7 L f:'.' TABLE I ACHIEVEMENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR PRIMARY USER MARKET HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT GOALS PROJECTED WASTE QUANTITIES Metropolitan Recovery Corporation The Facility ill accommodate both the September, 1984 Y private and public sector through striving to achieve the hazardous waste management goals of each. Minnesota's current hazardous waste landfill capacity requirement of approximately 10,000 tons per Anticipated Projected year could be increased by more than 50% if the Facility is not Amounts From Maximum Projected developed. The level of reduction in volume of hazardous waste Contractual Committed (Committed Maximum through recycling and reuse offered by the Facility would be Commitment Companies Companies) (Overall) non-existent in an in-house pretreatment scheme. Another factor contributing to a reduction in hazardous waste landfill Batch Dump 335,975 630,330 4,122,770 7,497,824 capacity is treatment rendering certain wastes non-toxic and (gal./yr.) therefore eligible for delisting as a non-hazardous waste. This treatment method to be utilized by the Facility will allow Sludge (Dewatered) 128 192 1,968 4,948 the delisted wastes to be disposed of in sanitary landfills. (drums/yr.) j. The Facility will allow publicly owned treatment works (POTW) a Sludge (Wet) 33,279 49,920 49,920 49,920 wider range of possible sludge management options by removing (lb./yr.) the toxic heavy metals with an efficiency that can surpass the established regulatory discharge limits. Also, the reuse of Canisters 3,207 6,664 11,194 13,271 f industrial process water will be enhanced leading to (can./yr.) F substantial conservation of water and lower sewer bills for f Facility users. Scrap Circuit 1,285 1,285 2,142 ! The fact that this treatment/recovery scheme involves a Boards ! centrally controlled facility provides the public with a (yd3/yr.) greater assurance of safety through effective management. The centrally controlled facility with professional hazardous waste management offers regulatory agencies an opportunity to exercise more precise and efficient control over a major portion of the state's hazardous waste. The Facility also provides industrial users with a professional team to manage their aqueous, inorganic wastes, a task most smaller users haven't the resources or the qualifications to perform. Through the provision of a hazardous waste management scheme offering controlled and competitive costs, reduction in cradle to grave liability and associated costs realized through the reduction of hazardous waste and a pooled insurance indemnity buffer help to make the Minnesota Superfund less debilitating. The Facility will keep user industries alive and competitive with other states. This will serve to attract and retain high technology corporations in Minnesota to which these users act as key support industries. The resource conservation opportunities available through the Facility, the cost effective recovery of valuable and strategic resources such as chrome, is another public-private benefit of this hazardous waste management scheme. A-13 Q The above factors illuminate the capability of the Facility to provide reduced risk to public health, safety and the environment while still providing user industries with economically competitive hazardous waste management that serves as a reasonable and prudent alternative to land disposal. f I A-14 i Minnesota Pollution Control Agency September 28, 1984 TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Attached is the environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) on a proposed metal waste Central Treatment and Recovery Facility to be located in the City of Roseville. The EAW was prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff and is being distributed for a 30-day review and comment period pursuant to 6 MCAR §3.027. The comment period will begin on October 8, 1984 when the EAW availability notice is published in the Environmental Quality Board Monitor. This EAW is essentially a reissuance of an EAW prepared by the MPCA staff on a similar facility proposed by the Metropolitan Recovery Corporation. The previous EAW was distributed for review in August, 1983 and considered by our Board on September 27, 1983. The new proposal differs from the original. proposal because of a slight project change (with the new proposal, liquid organic wastes will be stored at the facility and shipped to appropriate disposal sites) and a change in the proposed location of the facility (the original project would have been located in north- east Minneapolis) . Comments received on the EAW will be used by the MPCA in making its evaluation of the potential for significant environmental effects from this project and its decision on the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) . It is antici- pated that the MPCA will consider this matter at its regularly scheduled November meeting. Sincerely, Deborah R. Pile Director Office of Planning & Review DRP:es Attachment ` Phone:612/296-7799 1935 West County Road B2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-2785 Regional Offices • Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) MARK APPROPRIATE BOX: September 27, 1984 /X/ Regular EAW /_/ Scoping EAW NOTE TO REVIEWERS: Written comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the EAW information, potential impacts that may warrant investigation and/or the need for an EIS. Such comments must be submitted to the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) during the 30 day period following notice of the EAW' s availability in the EQB Monitor . Contact the EQB (612/296-3985) or the RGU to find out when the 30 day comment period ends. INSTRUCTIONS: Guidelines for assisting in completion of this worksheet may be obtained from EQB. Provide all information which is reasonably accessible. Attach additional sheets if necessary. EXPLAIN ALL ANSWERS. 1. Project Name : Central Treatment and Recovery Facility S2. Proposer : Metropolitan Recovery Corporation Contact Person: Gary G. Dodge, Vice President Address: 3512 Edmund Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406 Phone : ( 612 ) 724-0126 3. RGU: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Contact Person: Marlene Voita Address: 1935 West County Road B2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Phone: ( 612 ) 296-7796 4. Project Location: Northwest 1/4 of Section 8 , Township 29, Range 23 West a. County Name: Ramsey City Name: Roseville b. Attached are the following : 1. A county map showing the general area .of the project. Attachment 1. I 2. A copy of the USGS indicating the specific boundaries and topography of the project site. Attachment 2. 3. A site plan. Attachment 3. 4. A zoning map of the area. Attachment 4. 5. Aerial Photo of area. Attachment 5. 5. Describe the proposed project: The Metropolitan Recovery Corporation (MRC) is proposing to construct a waste metals central treatment and recovery facility. This facility will process solid wastes , liquid wastes, and ion exchange resin canisters containing cadmium, chromium, copper , lead, zinc, nickel , and other metals generated by metal platers, printed circuit manufacturers, and other metal finishing businesses (metal finishers) primarily located in the metro area, and recover metals and metal precipitates for sale and reuse. Unrecoverable wastes will be transformed into solids to be disposed in approved landfills. Organic liquids and sludges will be stored for transshipment to appropriate out-of-state treatment and disposal facilities. The facility will be constructed on a 4-acre site in Roseville at Walnut Street and Rose Place on an undeveloped industrially zoned ( I-2 ) site. (See EAW Figures, Attachments 1-5, for the project location. ) The site is within one of fourteen areas which the Minnesota Waste Management Board selected as a preferred area for plants processing hazardous chemical wastes. This site is designated only for chemical treatment plants or transfer/storage facilities. The facility is being proposed to help metal finishing shops, particularly the smallest shops who may not be able to afford any type of treatment, to comply with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) and federal pretreatment regulations which restrict metal waste discharges into the sewer system. These regulations took effect on April 27, 1984. The facility is the outcome of a feasibility study conducted by the Resource Recovery Task Force, a group formed by the Metropolitan Council and the Twin Cities Association of Metal Finishers 'in April of 1982, which included MPCA and Waste Management Board staff. The Task Force studied the feasibility of a central facility to treat metal waste generated in the metro area. As of August 30, 1984 , 28 out of a possible total of 96 Twin Cities metal finishers and electroplaters had contracted to utilize the proposed central facility. However , other companies included in the 96 have expressed interest in utilizing the facility once it is in operation. • 2. The facility will be operated as a Minnesota corporation. The 28 participating metal waste generators own stock and will have rights regarding the facility' s operation. The facility will consist of a 60,000 square foot building which will house processing equipment including separators, vats , and tanks to extract metals from the waste received from metal finishers. Specially designed trucks, semis and tank trucks, will transport waste material from the metal finishers to the facility. Metals will be recovered at the facility from inorganic solutions, sludges, and ion exchange canisters picked up at metal finishing plants. Bulk shipments of relatively concentrated solutions will be processed to extract metals and metal precipitates. Certain metals sludges will be accepted for further dewatering and processing. Processes to be used at the facility to remove metals from the incoming waste feed stock will include ion exchange, activated carbon adsorption, chromium reduction, electro- chemical recovery, metal precipitation, acid and base neutralization, filtration, and sludge thickening processes. Cyanide removal will be accomplished with a cyanide oxidation process. After metals removal , waste- water from these processes will be treated further by clarification and neutralization, and multimedia or sand filtration. (Refer to Attachment 6 for a detailed process description. ) Precipitated metal hydroxides will be • dewatered and processed for recovery and resale. It is expected that 10% to 25% , by dry metal weight, of the incoming metal waste will be recovered for reuse. Nonhazardous waste, primarily zinc, will constitute approximately 30%, by dry metal weight, of the incoming processed wastes. Approximately 75% of the total incoming wastes will not initially be amenable to recovery. These will be processed into inert solid residuals, mixed metal , dewatered sludges, or neutralized. Solid inert substances generated, if nonhazardous , will be disposed of at sanitary landfills in Minnesota. Mixed metal sludges and organic materials will be disposed of at approved out-of-state hazardous waste facilities, or at approved solvent and oil recovery facilities. 6 . Reason for EAW preparation: Mandatory Category MEQB Rule #: 6 MCAR § 3. 038. 0. 2 requires MPCA to prepare an EAW for construction of a hazardous waste processing facility which sells processing services to generators other than the owner and operator of the facility, of 1, 000 or more kilograms per month capacity. 7. Estimated construction cost: $5, 000 , 000 i 3. 8. Total project area (acres) : Four acres of an eight-acre site to be developed 9. Industrial building size: 60,000 square feet 10. Number of proposed parking spaces: 35 parking spaces for cars, and four transient truck holding parking spaces 11. List all known local , state, and federal permits/approvals/ funding required : Level of Government Type of Application Status Federal: Environmental Hazardous Waste Recy- To Be Submitted Protection Agency cling, Treatment, and Storage Facility Permits State: Minnesota Department Treatment Facility To Be Submitted of Energy and Construction Loan Economic Development Waste Management Waste Processing Submitted Board Facility Develop- ment Grants Minnesota Pollution Hazardous Waste Treat- To Be Submitted Control Agency ment and Storage Facility Permit Minnesota Pollution Solid Waste Facility To Be Submitted Control Agency Approval for Co- disposal of Non- hazardous Waste Local : Metro Waste Control Industrial Waste Water To Be Submitted Commission Discharge Permit Ramsey County Hazardous Waste To Be Submitted Transportation, Storage, and Processing License City of Roseville Zoning Amendment Submitted Special Use Permit To Be Submitted Building Permit To Be Submitted i 4. 12. Is the proposed project inconsistent with any: a. Adopted land use ordinances? • X No Yes The project is located in a General Industrial District (I-2) in the City of Roseville. A zoning amendment and special use permit authorizing this specific type of industrial use are necessary. b. Adopted comprehensive land use plans? X No Yes C. Local , state, or federal resource management plans? X No Yes If yes, explain: 13. Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. The site has never been developed. It is the only undeveloped parcel in this area. Neighboring industrial activities include: solvent storage and sales, ware- housing, forest products manufacturing, petroleum tank farm, and food processing , all in the I-2 zoned district. 14. Approximately what percent of the site is in each of the following categories? (Percentages should total 100% before and after construction. ) Before After Forest/Wooded 0% 0% Brush 0% 0% Grassland 0% 0% Cropland 0% 0% Urban vacant 100% 36% Wetland ( types 3-8 ) 0% 0% Impervious Surface 0% 30% Other (Building) 0% 34% 15. Show the type and location of soils on the site map. Give the SCS soil classification types, if known. The Ramsey County Soil Survey classification is 860c , Urban Land-Hayden-Kingsley complex, 3% to 15% slopes. Nearby well logs indicate clay and sand and gravel surface, with area characterized by clay to 12 ,feet. 5. 16. Does the site contain peat soils, steep slopes, sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, abandoned wells , or any geologic hazard? X No Yes Explain: 17. What is the approximate depth ( in feet) to: a. groundwater: 130' min. 140 ' avg. 'static water level in well pump data b. bedrock: 120 ' min. 1.30 ' avg. , Plattville limestone 18. Does any part of the project area involve : a. Shoreland zoning district? X No Yes b. Delineated 100-year flood plain? X No Yes C. State or federally designated river land use district? X No Yes Identify water body and applicable state classification( s) : • 19. Describe any physical alteration (e.g. dikes , excavation, fill , stream diversion) of any drainage system, lake, stream, and/or wetland. Estimate quantity of material to be dredged and indicate .where spoils will be deposited. None. 20. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water? X No Yes Explain ( indicate quantity and source) : 21. Will the project affect: a. Surface water quality (on or off the site) ? X No Yes 6. b. Groundwater quality (on or off the site)? X No Yes C. Groundwater levels in any wells (on or off the site) ? X No Yes Explain both during and after construction including any discharges expected. Project site stormwater related to construction activities will be minimal and be directed to existing municipal facilities adjacent to the site. As such, project site surface water quality should not be impacted significantly due to construction activities. The paved truck parking and unloading area will have storm water drainage facilities which connect to the municipal storm water drainage system. The on-site system will include gates and traps to enable the diversion of surface liquids into internal sumps and control equipment if a waste spill occurs. There is no planned discharge to ground or surface waters due to the operation of the facility. The facility will be subject to federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) , state, and county requirements for hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities. The project will comply with federal RCRA and state re- quirements for spill prevention control plans and counter- measures , container adequacy and management practices, and requirements for the design and operation of secondary containment systems. A buried 10, 000-gallon emergency spill containment area for . truck loading/unloading, a depressed truck dock area with spill containment in excess of 10,000 gallons, and a containment system for the waste storage area are proposed to be constructed to hold spills and leaks . With regard to the storage area, the floor under the storage containers will be impervious to contain leaks and spills and will be adequately sloped and have sufficient capacity to contain the volume of the largest container or 10% of the volume of the containers located in the storage area. It will also contain a sump or collection area to prevent overflow of the containment system. Also proposed is the construction of a paved spill containment dam separating the truck loading/unloading area and employee car parking lot. 7. 22. What type of waste water treatment will be used? X municipal individual (on-site) other The facility will dispose of approximately 80,000 gallons of wastewater per day (assuming a 28-shop case) into the municipal/metropolitan sewage treatment system. Wastewater will be pretreated at the facility to ensure compliance with applicable industrial wastewater effluent require- ments, including the federal categorical standards and local pretreatment limitations for the metropolitan disposal system for metals, and cyanide concentrations, wastewater pH, and any applicable federal regulations for wastewater discharges. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) categorical wastewater pretreatment regulations 40 CRF Part 413, for electroplating facilities and 40 CFR Part 433, for metal finishing facilities apply to the proposed facility. Local pretreatment limitations for the metropolitan disposal system (MDS) as set by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) also apply to the facility ( refer to Attachment 7 which presents the MDS limitations on discharges ( 6 MCAR § 6. 014 ) which are the MWCC ' s pretreatment standards for the project) . Metals which will be limited by concentration in the wastewater discharge include cadmium, total chromium, copper , lead, nickel , and zinc. There is also a limitation for mercury, but it is expected that mercury concentrations will be below minimal detectable limits in the wastewater discharge from the project to the sanitary sewer . The total cyanide concentration and pH will also be limited . In addition, the facility must pay for discharging total suspended solids concentrations or chemical oxygen demand levels over set base levels. Plastic polymers used for metal precipitation will contribute to the total suspended solids component. Processes to be used at the facility to remove metals from the incoming waste stream will include -ion exchange , activated carbon absorption, chromium reduction, electrochemical recovery, metal precipitation, filter press, and sludge thickening processes. Cyanide removal will be accomplished with a cyanide oxidation process. After metals removal , wastewater from these processes will be treated further by clarification and neutralization, and multimedia or sand filtration. Refer to Attachment 8, a letter from Edward J. Conway of Pope-Reid Associates , Incorporated, which discusses methods to be used to comply with the MDS limitations on discharges. 8. 23. Describe and indicate on a site map the provisions to control erosion and stormwater run-off. Include size and location of any retention basins, and discharge point( s) . • The portion of the site to be the construction site is relatively flat. The area of greater slope on site will be undisturbed by construction activites. As such, no additional stormwater control other than that proposed in Item 21 to control waste spills, will be implemented for the project. 24. Will the project generate: a. Air pollution? X No Yes b. Dust? No X Yes C. Noise? No X Yes d . Odors? X No Yes Explain both during and after construction, identify distances to noise sensitive land uses, and quantity and type of air pollutants. a. Process air emissions will not be significant since water-based , not organic solvent-based, processing will occur at the facility. However , an air . emissions control equipment permit may be required for the facility. if venting to the outside air is to occur or if a boiler is installed which exceeds Minnesota rule 7005. 0200 - 7005. 0250 requirements . Determination of the need for an air quality permit will be made after completion of the design specifications for the facility. In addition, air quality surveillance, monitoring systems of the storage, and processing equipment will be required through RCRA. b. During construction and operation of the proposed facility, the contractor and proposer must comply with Minnesota rule 7005. 0550 and implement dust control measures as necessary to minimize airborne fugitive dust. All roads within the facility will be paved. As such, reentrained particulate due to truck traffic will be kept to a minimum. C . The proposer must conform to Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) , RCRA, county, and city transportation requirements and will mitigate noise impacts by the use of properly muffled equipment, the routing of truck traffic to avoid an adverse effect on residents, where possible, limiting such traffic to 9. daytime hours, and conforming to the city' s truck route system. Facility operational noise at the truck dock loading/unloading area will be minimal due to design requirements. 25. Describe the type and amount of solid waste and/or hazardous waste that will be generated and the method and location of disposal . The facility will process incoming wastes not amenable to recovery into either inert solid residuals or mixed metal sludges. In the event that these wastes are processed into fixed solids, approximately 800 tons of solids in the form of inert blocks composed of cement and other fixation substances combined with trace amounts of mixed metals will be generated annually as a processing residual . In the alternative, if these wastes are processed into sludges , approximately 400 tons of partially dewatered mixed metal sludges will be generated annually as a process residual . Solid inert substances generated will be disposed at MPCA approved sanitary landfills in Minnesota. Mixed metal sludges will be disposed at approved hazardous waste facilities located in other states. See Table I, page Al2. 5 in Attachment 6 for a description of projected waste quantities for primary users of the proposed facility. The facility will also serve as a collection station for small quantities of organic wastes. These wastes will be combined with like wastes destined for similar final • treatment or disposal , and shipped in full truck load quantities to hazardous waste disposal facilities. This capacity will assist small and intermediate quantity generators which constitute a high percentage of all generators in Minnesota. The drum storage area will be capable of holding a maximum of 1,500 drums at one time; the expected average being about 1, 000. The storage area floor will be a continuous concrete pad , elevated in the center and sloping down on both sides to form two separate areas for handling incompatible wastes. Drums will be grouped according to method of final processing indicated by the generator on the manifest or bill of lading. The building will have a truck access opening and will be equipped with safety showers, fire detectors and extinguishers, a sprinkler system, two sumps, and other safety features required by governmental regulation. Wastes brought to the facility will be tested for agreement with manifest description and suitability of the final processing method indicated by the generator on the manifest. Only compatible wastes will be placed in the same area. Partial drums of the same waste material may be 10. combined to make full drums. Drums of the same liquid waste may also be combined in bulk storage tanks. Shipments to final hazardous waste -management facilities will be arranged as soon as sufficient quantities are accumulated. 26. Will the project involve: a. Fish or wildlife habitat? X No Yes b. A rare, endangered , threatened, or special concern species? (animals and/or plants) X No Yes c. Movement of any resident or migratory animals? X No Yes . Explain (Identify species and describe impact) : 27. Do any historical , archaeological or architectural resources exist on or near the project site? X No Yes Explain ( show resources. on a site map and describe impact) : 28. Will the project cause the impairment or destruction of : a. Designated park or recreation areas? X No Yes b. Prime or unique farmlands? X No Yes C. Ecologically sensitive areas? X No Yes d. Scenic views and vistas? X No Yes 11. e. Other unique resources (specify) ? X No Yes Explain: 29. What roads will receive increased traffic? (For each road indicate the current average daily traffic (ADT) and increase in ADT contributed by the project. ) It is estimated that there will be approximately 15 incoming truck trips per day. It is indicated from the attached traffic report, Attachment 9, that the Project would have a negligible effect on traffic even if the incoming volume were to increase three-fold. 30. Are adequate energy sources and utilities now available to service the project? No X Yes If not, what additiona�t lities will be required? SUMMARY OF ISSUES List the issues as identified by "yes" answers above. Discuss alternatives and mitigative measures for these issues. 21. Surface and ground water quality could be affected with an accidental spill. However , federal RCRA, state , and county requirements for hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities will prevent any adverse impacts from occurring . 24.c. Noise generated by truck traffic associated with the project will be alleviated by the use of properly muffled equipment , routing truck traffic to avoid an adverse effect on residents, and limiting such traffic to daytime hours. Facility operational noise at the truck dock loading/unloading area will be minimal due to design requirements. 24.b. Fugitive dust emissions due to the operation or construction of the proposed facility will be mitigated to assure compliance with Minnesota 7005.0550. All roads in and around the facility are paved. 12. CERTIFICATION BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I hereby certify that the information contained in this document is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that copies of the completed EAW have been made available to all points on the official EQB distribution list. Signature ��(,r �� Date 9/28 /SV Title Director, Office of Planning & Review 13. c � ire T i o - -= =_ - , G © r NI �gc-j C� law.- '49 -moo LZ _:�� 44 1 M A .Kl Olmsted County Resource Recovery Facility EAw • April, 1984 24a. continued The Rochester area is designated attainment for the criteria pollutants total suspended particulates (TSP) , lead, oxides of nitrogen and ozone. New Source Review requirements in nonattainment areas apply to new sources which emit 100.tons per year (TPY) or more of the pollutant for which the area is nonattainment. Estimated annual emissions of S02 from the proposed facility will exceed 100 TPY. Estimated CO emissions are less than 100 TPY. Facilities must control their emissions of nonattainment pollutants to the lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) . In addition, a requirement to. offset the new emissions must be met. Offsets are reductions in emissions of a pollutant at another source in the area. Offsets are measured in tons per year of the nonattainment pollutant. Since the Rochester area is nonattainment for the S02 ambient air quality standards (AAQS) and the proposed facility is a major source of S02, LAER must be demonstrated and emissions offset for S02. These require- ments do not apply for CO emissions since the proposed facility is not a major source of CO. Nonattainment requirements will apply'unless the area is redesignated to attainment prior 'to permitting of the facility. For a new source to be issued an air emissions facility permit, S02 emissions must be offset by reducing the S02 emissions of an existing source in the area by a 1.1 to 1 amount or more. If sufficient offsets are not available, exemption provisions can be utilized which allow such facilities to be con- structed when offsets are not available. A possible scenario for the proposed Campus facility is to offset its emissions by the retirement of the boilers at the Associated Milk Producers, Inc. (AMPI) facility. Negotiations are currently underway to provide the AMPI facility with its required steam from the Campus facility. Assuming that these negotiations are successful, and AMPI agrees to limit or eliminate use of its boilers, a part of the needed offset may be available. The MPCA 1980 emission inventory data indicates that the AMPI facility emitted 58 TPY of S02. Thus, the proposed waste to energy Campus facility's estimated annual emissions could be reduced by 58 TPY. However, the offset rule requires that a net reduction in S02 emissions of equal to or greater than 132 TPY be obtained. In addition, the RCA's proposed administrative policy regarding the state- wide ceiling on sulfur dioxide emissions requires that S02 emissions of greater than 100 TPY due to the operation of a new source must be offset by an equivalent reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions in acid rain sensitive areas. 3c ATTACHMENT 2 r a b•ta•,w•..s • •T r -, ParY \�- IUI : � .� 1111 \ '� I�• _ /—" I _�_ ��.•�^`�' ,OLU-NrBIA HE?�A C^ `u : .•-S ° �. �J•.. '.. G, _ _G QP� _ • 1 I'I' t. _ 1 .1 fie•- 1�" ,: ', T ATwo JIM . \.• -�'--]- ,� - �ilr'�(�, wgrU \- 1 t�f'it c•:II.• .:�� c��rr . .au � , •�. �NA • 1°t •�• .." /o��i � •1111 lf�• ��C: :�. ....-... _s _ _ � .. ',LJ_ � a s O P e •�� •e•`I 1;' I �T' I�l i Q! ��: :jI rt•, `'..' ..�"' \ Law r A• _ •�. +�I ' • 2� .t'.Pan' .. y• 1 �` �. �'.jµJ 1. ??". - a_7 ~yl• i_�'F9 _ _ '' • _ �-•`al..,.,YS.I{. •—i �. ••�r '�7�� ws'(.� �` rf,.v Ce^� - .• rl,/\,I �9■.' u^rry ` .1� •� • � __ ■ _-_-�'t��'�' * .•'.. -...w� ,- • E PT .r•-- .�- LI r! Hi Seh �1 1/`1/,•r.-_ , _�.���_� x •� �N Cenral •1I .... •+ •::::�•_. � ::/;'•: 51j0°, o , i (,anglml mm ' 1 * _ y ••• • , c ao. a vas : 4 ris lime odti�p ge ttru 9 ti • • • • ''� r i • '\ �a• • • II . ■ finer win AuOre -r. • as} , °,., , .q • , r ' —�I r. 1-4 Jq�I ,4' + PROJECT SITE _, y I:» � _`� ZI WT dill. lor 06 p I, a ) S as j1r:-•�` . =;��°�Ja• J'- P ( �� _ Grdss 1.; :\ ^-:II. ,•�-O-Y _ .. t - • I Lcfc air=°j=-- -"!a --- //,,,,J_ I • ;.'_- L ,,,lr �{> i. � ��`` �21� ••j�� ��UN'Y BNvus � _ ••. �1 t 0 i� Ncr,^ease -5^ .._. !� ... �� �. . ........ I Jr Hlen Se5 -r..:---r.T...... .Atn.e1•e F,ei011 '\\frtiL:% wv� �'— :� ' +I� r,a R 'l _�... •1V �_.... Couftuy C146 +•v••eao"_s-C.+,a s r, •82 12 200000 FEET • •' --_ 33. R 24 W R 23 W. ),2'30° 17 r, ro,f 5 71 rS T.;AJ l 7NrE5 Tl •e!8 10.1 SCALE 12.3000 - - } 0 116 e•M 1000 0 :DOD 2000 i1Y10 .000 5000 (700 '000 FEET GM S 0 "LOOPER S o'a•". B9 MILS CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET 2 MILS NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 • RA . p ! • I� 750'= NEI- co:�iF+DC.0 00 nO F A-I[ 1 T xOl.D mO �—E.—T.•xC! / o CAP PAP . . SINGLE STORY,BUILDING vuv[ I APPROXIMATELY 155'!980' SED m[F vuvEO —,a[+AC.....p-11 A .... I eFw stop,RATE.m(FT Va MTP A C•xws[E.DE—EPY [Ne „ x D n F e T •,ce I I I I y Es:FtIcF WEOE ENTRANCE CIJ [-eII LANE iOP ixlPECTIOx L.. • ( CA.PAR•m0 xTUl k, C.R. P•v PLLL COxt•ix,ExT CAN Im(.1....T H LAJ O O O o 00 e O I m O e!e- . .. •,• n[mD 1.EFs .. .. . s•sW 1. ?. . .. I SKETCH PLAN SITE AREA: 5.24 ACRES APPROXIMATE SCALE. 1'=90' BUILDING AREA: 50.500 S.F. CENTRAL PROCESSING •. •• PARKING SPACES: 95 8 TREATMENT FACILITY TRANSIENT TRUCK HOLDING SPACES: osl.•�T[E x�rrT SO.• .E . METROPOLITAN RECOVERY CORPORATION Mlerba . PRELIMINARY SKETCH PLAN UW FTI ski f _ NWR mw L,-fir TREATMENT FACILITY low" On BDUKDART _ • MINNESOTA Section a TowrmNp 29 Range 23 sp 0 1/4 1/2 rrdle , . loom . Y IS.lI�'• "f j ._ �' .fit. ! - � ��"•. 1"- Sit z. 4r wit ti` r ;� i.• !ETC � a' • '� � M ATTACHMENT fi FACILITY DESCRIPTION Central Treatment and Recovery Facility Prepared for: MINNESOTA WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD Treatment and Processing Facility Grants. Program Prepared by: METROPOLITAN RECOVERY CORPORATION September, 1984 Attachment A FACILITY DESCRIPTION Metal plating and metal finishing, including printed circuit fabrication and protective coating applications, are important to industry in the Twin Cities area. . Products from these metal coating firms are used by many of the area' s manufacturing businesses. Provision of these essential product treatments contributes to the Twin Cities' prominence in electronics and computer related manufacturing and associated high tech industries. There are 94 companies engaged in some form of metal finishing business in the Twin Cities. Waste metals occur as process residuals from metal finishing. Federal water pollution control laws now limit the discharge of these toxic metals as. sewered chemical wastes. . Electroplating, printed circuit shops and metal finishing firms forced to comply with pretreatment standards established under the Clean Water Act, are now faced with a choice between two basic pretreatment methods for removing their toxic metal discharges from their wastewater. It is noted that in-house water reduction measures, waste reduction and improved "housekeeping" measures are inherent to both of these basic methods : • _ In-house pretreatment using conventional systems which chemically reduces chromium, oxidizes cyanide, and precipitates heavy metals as hydroxide sludges for disposal as a hazardous waste, and Centralized treatment and recovery which allows for optimal recovery of metals (primarily through the use of ion exchange technologies) through improved economies of scale. A centralized facility provides more feasible access to secondary material markets, it allows generators to avoid costly hazardous waste land disposal costs, and it provides for a greater resource pool to fund necessary research activities and capital investments. Twenty-eight metropolitan area companies have joined together to develop a centralized treatment and recovery facility ( the Facility) for managing their residual waste water discharges. The Metropolitan Recovery Corporation (MRC) -is the business entity established to develop the Facility. • A-1 FACILITY CONCEPT The six heavy metals used by electroplating and printed circuit board firms which are currently discharged into the sewer and are now subject to pretreatment standards are copper, chromium, nickel, cadmium, zinc and lead. These metals along with cyanide, which is also present in some of these waste waters, will be treated at the Facility so that participating firms can comply with discharge regulations. A preliminary Facility concept has been developed as part of a proposal submitted by MRC to the MWCC, as well as the conceptual feasibility work done for the Metropolitan Councils' Resource Recovery Task Force. While certain components of the Facility' s scope may change as a result of pilot scale testing and preliminary design work, major components described in this section are expected to be incorporated into the Facility' s final design. Explicit in the Facility' s design is treatment and recovery. The treatment technologies include those processes which render the aqueous inorganic wastes received by the Facility more amenable to recovery, less expensive to handle and/or less hazardous to manage. The use of these treatment processes may occur as in-plant modifications in the electroplating or printed circuit shops participating in the project, or done at the Facility itself . The recovery systems, on the other hand, are those processes designed to extract raw materials (chrome, nickel, zinc, etc. ) from appropriately treated wastes. A general process flow sheet is presented in Figure 1. This shows the overall relationship of the incoming feed stocks to the Facility' s various treatment technologies and recovery systems. The incoming feedstock includes ion exchange canisters, metal-specific waste water solutions (batch dumps) and solids (metal-specific and mixed metal sludges) . The following individual treatment and recovery systems that are to be involved in the proposed Facility are described in detail. Ion Exchange The ion exchange process is a stoichiometric chemical reaction whereby an ion from a solution is exchanged for a similarly charged ion that is attached to an immobile solid particle. These particles make up a granular solid called an ion exchange resin. This process is utilized in the metals pre-treatment process to concentrate the metals present in the waste water at the plant so that transportation of the metals to the Facility for recovery will be more economical. Ion exchange may also be used to treat spent plating baths as an end of pipe treatment but its greatest value is in the recovery applications. A-2 FICIIRE I. CENTRAL RrnIVERY FACLI.ITY GENERAL PROCESS Ff.(1WSIIF.ET Chemical Storage To Other Process Steps Ion Exchange Spent 6 Fresh \ Metals Recovery/ Resin Canlsters� Canister Storage Canister Regeneration Waste waters Concentrate Plating Product Copper 6 Storage Storage Cadmium Metal Wastewater - Wastewater CMetal Specific Storage Tanke rome uct Tank Truck misc. Wastewaters Precipitation Precipitation Waste Solids Multi Media Wastewnt,er DewaterIng' Filter to Sewer Solids - Solids Storage Solids Dewntering Product Recovered Metal Precipl- Metal Specific b Storage �taten Zinc. Nicket, Lead, Tauk Truck Mixed - Drum 6 Chromium.-Copper aste Sol.1 Approved Off-Site Storage Disposal Ion exchange resins are classified as cation or anion exchangers. Both types are produced from the same basic organic polymers. The chemical behavior of the resin is determined by the particular ionizable group attached to the resin. The following is a list of five resin types that may be used by the Facility for metals along with the important characteristics of each. 1 . Strong Acid Cation - The important characteristics of this resin type are: The exchange capacity is not affected by the pH of the solution, it is the least expensive resin, it is the most durable and its selectivity is low so it may pick up hardness in the water. 2. Weak Acid Cation - Important characteristics are: The exchange capacity is reduced at a solution pH below 6, it will tend not to pick up water hardness because the selectivity for heavy metal is higher and it is a more expensive resin than the strong acid but a smaller amount of reagents are needed to reverse the reaction and regenerate the resin. 3 . Strong Base Anion - Important characteristics are: The exchange capacity is unaffected by solution pH, it is generally more expensive than the cation resins, it has a shorter functional life span than cation resins and the resin can be fouled by organics in the solution. 4 . Weak Base Anion - Important characteristics are: The exchange capacity is reduced above a solution pH of 7 , the resin cost is the same as the strong base anion, and less reagent is necessary for resin regeneration than for the strong base anion resin. 5 . Heavy Metal Chelating Resins - Important characteristics are: It has a higher selectivity for heavy metals than does the weak acid cation resin so it can separate heavy metals from high levels of water hardness in the solution, reduced amounts of reagent are required for regeneration, it is the most expensive resin type, and removal of heavy metals is effective above a solution pH of 4. The ion exchange resins are housed in a canister which is attached to a drain pipe on the rinse tank ( see Figure 2) . The rinse solution flows through the canister, the metal is removed allowing the exiting water to flow to the sewer. When the exchange capacity of the canister (containing the resins) is reached, it is replaced by a fresh one. Saturated canisters are transported to the Facility and regenerated. Regeneration is accomplished by flushing the resins with a concentrated acid or base solution, depending on the resin type, which effec- tively reverses the exchange reaction. A-3 ure 2 79 -1 Body Fi 9 790-2 Tee ION EXCHANGE CANISTER 790-3 1/2" Fill Cap OUTLET 790-4 Hose Barb , 790-5 Aluminum Nut • 790-6 Tee "O" Ring 3/4" I.D. HOSE 79D-7 Fill Cap "O" Ring 4 79D-8 Bushing "O" Ring MAD 907 Distributor 790-11 13/16" x - 4" ABS 9 79x12 908 Distributor 5 790-13 Shipping Cap , 5 9 q 3/4" I.D. HOSE 13 2 ' 3 INLET ' . SHIPPING CAPS 7 13 1 6 . 2'h"-S THREAD 8 . rf 10 3� DU. FT. o CMB-11 5B.. o • 11 o 54" 13"NOMINAL I.D. FIBRE-GLASS TANK 3.5 CU. FT. INTERIOR Volume (Structural Fibers, Inc. Vessel-Vinyester) 12 i=€ c c ..007" to .010" SLOTS IN DISTRIBUTORS 6& 1/, ABLE D.I. UNIT a typical exchange unit DATE — DRAWING NO. — The advantages of the ion exchange treatment system are: the water savings are significant; the feedstream can be dilute as is the case in rinse waters; and the energy consumption is low. The disadvantages are: capital costs are high; chemical, labor and maintenance costs are high; the equipment is complex; and the performance of the system depends on the operator. Electrolytic Recovery ' I This is a process in which there is an electrochemical reduction of metal ions to elemental metal. In the electrochemical cell a sufficient level of direct current voltage is applied across two electrodes, overcoming the reversible electromotive force of the cell, causing the metal ions to plate out at the cathode. The cathode is the electrode at which electrons are taken up by the metal and reduction occurs. The other electrode is the anode. Oxidation occurs here and electrons are given up to the electrode. The electrolytic recovery of metals has been proven technically feasible by the primary and secondary copper industry. Copper is purified using these electrochemical techniques. Electrolytic recovery is also used to recover tin,. silver, copper and other metals from plating and etching drag out wastes in some electroplating plants. Electrolytic recovery was chosen as the metal recovery process • for the copper and cadmium wastes entering the Facility. Copper will be recovered using a large electrowinning tank while cadmium recovery will require a smaller plating cell . Zinc and nickel waste streams are believed to be contaminated with copper and other metals along with other impurities. The electromotive series position of nickel and zinc are higher than the contaminating metals so their recovery by this electrolytic process is uneconomical . The important factors which determine the efficiency of electrolytic recovery of metals are, water temperature, water flow rate, the current density and electrode area of the cell ( for plating) , the type of metal and metal concentration in the water, and the types of contaminants and their concentration in the water. There is also a possibility of reusing the spent electrolytic solutions as a regenerant solution for the ion exchange resins. • A-4 Activated Carbon Adsorption • The plating baths in electroplating and printed circuit board manufacturing shops normally become contaminated with a variety of substances. The important contaminants of concern to the proposed metals recovery system are those that adversely affect the ion exchange resins. These important contaminants include strong oxidants that may physically break down the resin, chelating agents and oils or other organics that may gradually foul the resin and various suspended solids that may foul the ion exchange column. Therefore, it is essential that these organic contaminants be removed from the waste water prior to the ion exchange treatment in order to preserve the longevity of the resins. Activated carbon performs this required step by the process of adsorption. There are three important steps in the process of adsorption of dissolved organics in the waste water by the granular activated carbon. First is the transport of the solute through a film on the surface of the activated carbon granule to the exterior surface of the carbon. The second step is the diffusion of the solute through the pores of the carbon to its interior. Finally, adsorption of the solute occurs on the interior surfaces of the pore and capillary spaces of the activated • carbon. The effectiveness of adsorption by activated carbon is dependent upon a number of factors. The physical and chemical nature of the solution, the nature of the material to be adsorped, including its molecular size and polarity, the type of contacting system (carbon column for example) and its mode of operation, and the nature of the carbon itself. Activated carbon canisters would be used at the industrial shops as a prefilter to the ion exchange system. At the Facility there will be two activated carbon columns installed in series. At the Facility the main function of the carbon would be to trap suspended solids and remove organics from nickel and copper waste waters which arrive at the facility in bulk shipments. once the carbon columns have reached their capacity they must be replaced with fresh activated carbon columns. In order to be disposed of they will first be dried and then incinerated. The ash may then be disposed of in a sanitary landfill. Since no heavy metals are adsorped by the carbon, none will be present in the ash. A-5 Chromium Reduction Chromium exists in the hexavalent form in etching, plating and • chromating baths and rinse waters. Hexavalent chromium is much more reactive and toxic than the other forms of chromium. Hexavalent chromium must be reduced to the trivalent form in order to be less toxic upon discharge of small amounts to the environment and to avoid destruction of the ion exchange resins. To accomplish this reduction, an acidic solution of sulfur dioxide or sodium bisulfite is reacted with the chrome solution. Sulfur dioxide is often used to cure resins but it is more difficult to use than sodium bisulfite. Although sodium bisulfite is slightly more expensive, it was chosen as the more preferable reagent for chromium reduction. The reduction reaction may take place in a simple mixing tank with mixer. An auxiliary mixing tank is needed for the sodium bisulfite and acid. One chromium reduction system will be installed in each shop to protect the ion exchange reins. There will also be one in the Facility. Cyanide Oxidation Cyanide destruction or removal is also required for the • wastewater to meet the MWCC pretreatment regulations. In order to remove the cyanide for reuse it must be complexed and precipitated from the solution. This process, however, is very complicated and the cyanide may not be in a saleable form when recovered. Destroying the cyanide through oxidation to carbon dioxide and nitrogen is much more simple. Cyanide is used in plating solutions and ends up in the wastewater from electroplating and printed circuit board plants and is trapped by the ion exchange resins. The cyanide will subsequently occur in the ion exchange regenerant solution at the Facility. The required oxidation reaction by which cyanide is destroyed is performed by reacting sodium hypochlorite, chlorine or chlorine dioxide with the regenerant solution. Chlorine is toxic, corrosive and difficult to control. It is the least expensive of the three; however, the Facility and the individual shops are probably too small to take advantage of this lower cost. Chlorine dioxide is also dangerous to use because of its tendency to explode at 10°C, its boiling point. Sodium hypochlorite is only available in an aqueous solution, however, it is the easiest of the three reagents to control. For this reason, sodium hypochlorite was chosen as the oxidizing reagent for cyanide destruction. Sodium hydroxide is also required as an additional reagent for the oxidation reaction. A-6 A covered mixing tank with mixer is required for the reaction. The auxiliary equipment required consists of a mixing tank for the sodium hypochlorite and the sodium hydroxide. The individual shops will have a pretreatment system and the Facility will require an oxidation reactor with auxiliary equipment. Metal Precipitation and Sludge Thickening Soluble metal salts occur in plating bath dumps, etching bath dumps, metal finishing rinse waters and the ion exchange regenerant solutions. In order to be removed from the aqueous solution, the metal salts must be converted to insoluble hydroxides or sulfides. Sulfide precipitation removes more metal from the wastewater than hydroxide precipitation. This is why a two step process is used to remove the bulk of a metal from solution as a hydroxide and then polishing the solution with a sulfide precipitation step. Hydroxide precipitation, as a process, has a greater product flexibility and simpler discharge pretreatment requirements than sulfide precipitation. For these reasons hydroxide was chosen as the precipitator for the Facility. Metal hydroxide sludges can be redissolved in acids and converted to more soluble forms for reuse. This cannot be done with metal sulfide sludges because of the danger of toxic hydrogen sulfide gas being generated. Also, the • required treatment of wastewaters from hydroxide precipitation is a simple neutralization with an acid. The removal of excess sulfide from the waste water may require air stripping which is much more complicated and expensive. The choice of base to add to the metal solution is an important factor affecting both the technical performance and the cost of the system. Calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide are all commonly used. The precipitation of these metal hydroxides is not instantaneous so proper equipment is required to ensure an adequate retention time for the settling to occur. The thickening of the sludge formed from the metal hydroxide precipitation must also be facilitated by the equipment. Two standard circular clarifiers with rotating scrapers will be utilized by the Facility. A flocculant will most likely be added to the clarifier to aid in a more complete precipitation of the metal hydroxides. The most common flocculants are ferric chloride, alum and a variety of water soluble polymers. A-7 Sludge Dewatering The metal hydroxide sludges will have a water content of about 958 when they come out of the clarifier. This water content is too great for the sludges to be suitable for sale or disposal. These sludges, therefore, must be dewatered as much as possible before they can be stored, disposed of, or sold. The conventional plate-and-frame filter press is the most effective- filtration apparatus available. While other dewatering devices such as vacuum filters can only attain a water content of 708 , the plate and frame press can reduce water content from 958 to 508. Sludges that cannot be sold through the secondary metals market will be fixated with a Portland cement mixture and disposed. Portland cement is a good fixation agent and contingent upon the hazardous waste delisting procedure, the material produced may be disposed of in sanitary landfills. Copper Recovery Copper will enter the Facility in five forms. Bulk shipments of concentrated copper in acidic wastewater are treated by electrolytic recovery. Bulk shipments of chelated copper compounds in wastewater are first passed through an activated carbon column to remove the chelating agents and then are treated by electrolytic recovery. Copper concentrated on ion exchange resins during the treatment of copper wastewaters is flushed during resin regeneration with water, sulfuric acid and caustic soda. The resin regenerant solution containing copper is treated by electrolytic recovery. Copper cyanide complexes concentrated on ion exchange resins are treated in a similar manner. The resin is regenerated using caustic soda and water. The regenerant solution containing copper cyanide complexes is treated with sodium hypochlorite and caustic soda to oxidize the cyanide and then treated by electrolytic recovery. Finally bulk shipments of waste water containing copper cyanide complexes are treated to oxidize the cyanide and then transferred to the electrowinning tanks for electrolytic recovery. Wastewater from any and all of these treatments is neutralized and filtered to remove suspended solids before discharge to the sewer. Any wastewater containing copper that is too contaminated for economical electrolytic recovery is precipitated as copper hydroxide and resold. A-8 Cadmium Recovery Cadmium arrives at the Facility as cadmium cyanide complexes concentrated on ion exchange resins and bulk shipments of wastewater containing concentrated cadmium. The resin is regenerated with caustic soda and water then treated to oxidize the cyanide. The regenerant solution and the bulk shipments of wastewater are transferred to a small plating cell and the cadmium is electrolytically recovered. Wastewater not containing cadmium is neutralized, filtered and discharged. Chrome Recovery Bulk shipments of chrome in the hexavalent form are reacted with sodium bisulfite for reduction to the trivalent form. Trivalent chrome is also concentrated on ion exchange resins. The resin regenerant solution (produced by flushing with caustic soda and water) and the reduced bulk shipment solutions are treated by precipitation. The chrome hydroxide is dewatered and resold. Any waste waters from these treatment processes that do not contain chrome are neutralized and filtered before discharge to the sewer. Zinc Recovery Zinc cyanide complexes in bulk shipments of waste water and . concentrated on ion exchange resins are treated to oxidize the : cyanide after the resin is regenerated. The zinc is then precipitated as zinc hydroxide, fixated and resold or disposed. Wastewater generated during these treatment processes that does not contain zinc is neutralized and filtered before discharge. Nickel Recovery Nickel enters the Facility as nickel in acidic wastewater and concentrated on ion exchange resin. The bulk shipments of electroless nickel are run through an activated carbon column to remove the organic chelating agents present. The ion exchange resins are regenerated using sulfuric acid, sodium chloride and water. The regenerant solutions and bulk shipments of both types are treated by precipitating the nickel as nickel hydroxid'e, dewatered, and resold on the secondary metals market. Wastewaters from these treatments, not containing nickel, are neutralized, filtered and dishcharged. Lead Recovery Bulk shipments of wastewater containing lead and a lead hydroxide sludge generated during in-plant treatment are the two forms of lead arriving at the Facility. The lead is precipitated from the wastewater as lead hydroxide. Both sludges are dewatered and sold if possible. Fixation and disposal is the other alternative. Wastewater generated during these processes, not containing lead, is neutralized and filtered before discharge. A-9 TYPES, VOLUMES & DISTRIBUTION OF WASTES • The facility will be designed to manage aqueous inorganic wastes in general, and more specifically the aqueous and inorganic wastes generated by electroplating, printed circuit and other metal finishing industries. The general waste market potentially served by the Facility includes Minnesota industries contributing to the "heavy metal inorganic solution and sludges" category identified in the Board' s Hazardous Waste Management Report. According to this data, 33 , 800 tons per year or 19 . 4% of the state' s total hazardous waste falls into this category. Through a market assessment performed by MRC and Touche Ross Company, .6 million gallons of aqueous waste were identified as a potential market for the- Facility. These wastes include spent acid and alkaline solutions, mixed metal sludges, and other heavy metal solutions. The source of ' this data is the MPCA/Hennepin County Hazardous Waste Management Information System. While all of this waste could potentially be managed by the Facility, MRC has evaluated the general aqueous inorganic waste market in very broad terms . Additional analysis of the technical and economic aspects associated with these wastes represents a significant component of the Facility' s future development and marketing plans. • The specific waste market -for which the Facility will be primarily targeted is the aqueous inorganic wastes generated by electroplating, printed circuit and other metal finishing industries. There are 94 ,such firms in the metropolitan area and 42 firms in the outstate area. Based upon MRC' s original market assessment, as well as revisions made recently to reflect wastes committed through user contracts, Table 1 has been developed to estimate and project the amount of wastes that may be managed by the Facility. It is noted, that due to the proprietary nature of MRC' s marketing and user contract data, only summaries are included in the Table 1 characterization of the Facility' s primary market. It is also noted that the values in Table 1 have been developed in 4 categories as described below: Contractual Commitment - Guaranteed revenues based upon signed contracts with MRC. Anticipated amounts from committed companies - Amount of waste expected at the Facility based on historical effluent data, personal conversations and site visits. Due to the "put or pay" provisions in the contract, the contractual commitments are lower than the actual anticipated quantities. Therefore, this category represents a more accurate estimate of the waste which will actually be received by the Facility under current contractual commitments- A-11 • Projected Maximum ( from committed companies) - This category represents the amount of waste which could be expected from the Facility if all committed companies sent all of the waste to the Facility including batch dumps. The exception to this is a few committed companies who have in-house systems and will not be using ion exchange canisters. Due to the initial price structure, several companies have chosen to send dilute rinse waters to the Facility via ion exchange canisters and to treat all batch dumps in-house. Since the original contract, a price reduction has been implemented for batch dumps making it more attractive for these companies to send batch dumps to the Facility. The assumption that 'all batch dumps will be committed to the Facility may be valid for smaller shops currently without in-house treatment systems, however, for larger shops who are planning to combine in-house treatment with the Facility, it may be unrealistic to assume that these companies would send all of their batch dumps to the Facility under the current price structure. A similar situation exists for cyanide canisters. The end result is that the batch dump and cyanide canister estimates listed under the projected maximum category are probably high since the Facility will have to significantly reduce its per unit fees to attract the larger shops. Projected Maximum (overall) - This category represents the amount of waste which is expected at the Facility if, in addition to the wastes in the projected maximum from committed companies category, all companies in the metropolitan area send their sludges and batch dumps to the Facility. As described above, this is probably unrealistic in terms of batch dump quantities. Projected revenues from sludges, however, may be more accurate since the Facility is currently offering a competitive price for sludge disposal. The projected maximum (overall) estimates do not assume any canister users from non-committed companies. A-12 TABLE I PRIMARY USER MARKET • PROJECTED WASTE QUANTITIES Metropolitan Recovery Corporation . September, 1984 Anticipated Projected Amounts From Maximum Projected Contractual Committed (Committed Maximum Commitment Companies Companies) (Overall ) Batch Dump 335 , 975 630 ,330 4,122,770 7,497 , 824 (gal ./yr. ) Sludge (Dewatered) 128 192 1,968 4,948 (drums/yr. ) Sludge (Wet) 33 , 279 49,920 49 , 920 49 , 920 (lb./yr. ) Canisters 3 , 207 6,664 11, 194 13 , 271 (can./yr. ) Scrap Circuit 1, 285 1 , 285 2,142 Boards (yd3/yr. ) 1 ACHIEVEMENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT GOALS The Facility will accommodate both the private and public sector through striving to achieve the hazardous waste management goals of each. Minnesota' s current hazardous waste landfill capacity requirement of approximately 10,000 tons per year could be increased by more than 50% if the Facility is not developed. The level of reduction in volume of hazardous waste through recycling and reuse offered by the Facility would be non-existent in an in-house pretreatment scheme. Another factor contributing to a reduction in hazardous waste landfill capacity is treatment rendering certain wastes non-toxic and therefore eligible for delisting as a non-hazardous waste. This treatment method to be utilized by the Facility will allow the delisted wastes to be disposed of in sanitary landfills. The Facility will allow publicly owned treatment works (POTW) a wider range of possible sludge management options by removing the toxic heavy metals with an efficiency that can surpass the established regulatory discharge limits. Also, the reuse of industrial process water will be enhanced leading to substantial conservation of water and lower sewer bills for Facility users. • The fact that this treatment/recovery scheme involves a centrally controlled facility provides the public with a greater assurance of safety through effective management. The centrally controlled facility with professional hazardous waste management offers regulatory agencies an opportunity to exercise more precise and efficient control over a major portion of the state' s hazardous waste. The Facility also provides industrial users with a professional team to manage their aqueous, inorganic wastes, a task most smaller users haven' t the resources or the qualifications to perform. Through the provision of. a hazardous waste management scheme offering controlled and competitive costs, reduction in cradle to grave liability and associated costs realized through the reduction of hazardous waste and a pooled insurance indemnity buffer help to make the Minnesota Superfund less debilitating. The Facility will keep user industries alive and competitive with other states. This will serve to attract and retain high technology corporations in Minnesota to which these users act as key support industries. The resource conservation opportunities available through the Facility, the cost effective recovery of valuable and strategic resources such as chrome, is another public-private benefit of • this hazardous waste management scheme. A-13 The above factors illuminate the capability of the Facility to provide reduced risk to public health, safety and the environment while still providing user industries with economically competitive hazardous waste management that serves as a reasonable and prudent alternative to land disposal. • A-14 r z w U Q Q O d u a 0c 0 w 0Ol0 ��_ - a_m N' j c ! u ° A al V Cy d aa .- aVL or p c ° ° V q=n E c �o 44 in OL 0 cv� u ° CAA.. a. mu"400Ec°_c �c a '" � � ��Da °�° M ~ ° aN0to c ° o VamL �O M q al !_- "N O - - 0,0 - 0 U y a O a, N al W r D c a n C u L :: d c t ~ 1a ° °mac � �° v 'Qw �' cDacaa '�° ". i° E a'" �vu6cEo ° aai � oacvwaya oayv E o m . a, E N _ 0nn 'ma an uo =0 ono Q vial a Ore �, 0 0 c 44 r M m c m t y a 0 v >. 46� b >.� a �.� d� E � � o `°a c s t E— 0 _ • w c ; a m :V',�a > v ao Qoa °' ° 'c° � o�o a Es aa', �� c a - C c E X17 uvi ° cam c � - _� u Qao3u40 Edduac � 1°t°i.NW 4) - 44 - : 0C :ta � ° °� � 0 p �\ a1 N Q C 60 U N a q ` E L w w 3 C 0 L m F m u N•- « w a - c a, � .. O OlO0aOC1C1Q a 4 '-" ;, c al u a o io « �� c io .= 02 i° � w 0) 4, oo N ~ o > >a io _o u ° ° 3 0 > >N � �E E E E E E E E o 3 E N E aoD Oa a:. c- o'- = Q E 4D to `-° w L °' 1° 4) o '° w �. M o �a '° cm g00000�oo N M �.o o �o o uW� m c y � ac a :- aV m'E � aI-°c m _ 310. J � cmdo46v c;fDao ° q >V a - - a,o �� a m c v'o aE o =_ a c E � c al o- o a c o E cmLQ c mb tq - S u > L E uV`° ; � 3 0 '� - EDtt� 3 a - L �- owalc W � c ,o .. cmo ,� oF- m o o E oQo cc ° 0 a u? �o ° >.°- `c oQ alr..a. 3 - nc �'a in `q awit " c °' C m ��' c c ` Q !r p= O u N C j N a► u •� C d >.- W C a L w U .C.- !] W ` a ~_ oz c� E al 4, V- '-n t plv•N � al °c o E wo a._ m u ac ar a .°_ ��.. aiQt t E u k .0 O •- u!" ,;c a m" `° ° a 0, 3 ,0,-1 d �+ � � aaaioO Ed - n0mc � a � � dduaiaadaaataoNy 'ow J gDuF LCr °� gNm � 00cO ° NOI :o0 LN �'cc >,dac � � O N � a/ dUq ^ aCC cC 0 N a/ o �, t c 0 0 o c >.10 a�pt.a 'E � w� o.- = �' a;i of cn > ate - a M = o ' 'E '° °'' v gLmN io >; o � mOraC: ma °1a = o W - >.omma '> u E-C -- = o'm - ca �:� oaA� w c al m u E °'? 3 al °ul .E i.° w w il► c a►« a► ;!o - - m- w' _ o c c w V a u L d W O z M-C CR« C . al a L a �. U C la a._ O 4• i0 V- c UE0 � U 1° � ° caENu a, u �a ; v � ° c 1ONd `� aav° c � d � ��� m� 2ma cm - wru a, L u a, o °L u ; o .. c m a`la, E - c Luc al'-> ct um Y� ,.c Z °c 'c ;�o4 ^ d =° mc � a >'° a, o ° E a°vvoa- CioC a3 � oEa° E � p._ o uw o U h � � u a, a, vau3al no :1 « wo °_ " a ° om X00 a0ocmioc gevc v o, o u� ccm � �,N E .l o a co, occa m o � oac � u E O ° V .p !0 Q d O '; OI W m .' v N O q 10 C ` C Ol'a C t of•- L d ° C d Lin y E b m ill C Q ..1 w c � .. o^_ -r ui m� doh as me u � 00 d Epj• w w b 'n - _ f `1 �,c � w � 2,- a O V o' a E V « ° v ° L d m v m o a os c al._ w E a, ° m' a at a, u In is 4 �mc a �•3�• a,ar2N Z � mZNZ ,� m� waas � mmalcv d° aarmmp " oo- 44 ameba« � dp ���� 40 0 010°' O" O ° agm , � u N� •L• �� O � EO°«�i403� ioo r«c w°. cri � E4C� ° °°E � E355� u : Oi�� •< Yr E o. C u d . uco o aL` 0 >.a, �, � c u u u C�VUV��ZN C. Dilution No Person shall use potable or process water in arty way for the purpose of diluting a discharge as a partial or complete substitute - for adequate treatment to achieve compliance with the limitations set forth in these Rules or applicable Pretreatment Standards. 'D. Trap Installations Grease, oil and sand traps shall be provided for the proper discharge of waste containing excessive amounts of grease, oil, or sand. All trap installations shall be regularly cleaned and maintained for ade- quate performance. E. Non-Contact Cooling Water Every Person shall discharge non-contact cooling water via a NPDES Permit whenever prudent and feasible. ATTACHMM 8 Pope - Reid Associates Inc. Environmental Engineering .. . 245 E.6th St.,Suite 1913. St.Paul,MN 55101 .612122716500 I,: •�• 1983 June 21 �`'� : 719 83 Mr. Gary Dodge 3512 Edmund Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55406 Dear Gary: This letter contains the information that you requested on 1983 June 16 and 20. I will deal with the sewer upgrading first and then with the information for the Environmental Assessment worksheet. Sewer Upgrading The average flow to the city sewer from the CRF should be about 60,000 - 100,000 gallons per day. Assuming eight hours operation per day this is 130 to 200 gallons per minute. For a one percent slope a cast iron, carbon steel , vitrified clay or concrete sewer pipe will handle the following flows: e 6 inch pipe about 225 gallons per minute • 8 inch pipe about 480 gallons per minute • 10 inch pipe about 850 gallons per minute Considering that the CRF will require peak flows above 200 gallons per minute in order to drain clarifiers and tanks the present six inch cast iron sewer pipe must be considered inadequate. I recommend an eight or nine inch connection to the adequate nine inch tile that connects the manhole to the City's University Avenue sewer. I have already estimated the cost of a 500 foot twelve inch field fabricated schedule 30 carbon steel connection for Pramod Kulkarni as 515,000, not including the trench. This would probably be reasonable for a 250 foot eight or nine inch connection including trench. Any of the .four materials should be suitable. I cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing six inch water pipe without knowing the length of the connection -and the water pressure maintained by the City in the mains. I will check on this for you. i f?A. Environmental Assessment Worksheet Information Based on the estimates -in the Phase I study the small CRF (26 shops, 60 canisters/day) should sewer about 64,000 gallons per day and the large CRF (45 shops, 90 canisters per day) should sewer 96,000 gallons per day. There was a market survey at the end of Phase I. the shops expressing interest in canister service in that survey would require about seventy canisters per day. It was also possible to estimate the amounts of metals to be handled by the CRF as sludges for the shops expressing interest in sludge services in that survey. The amounts of metals in these sludges were consistent with the sludge gallonage estimated in Phase I. The amounts of the batch dumps (about forty percent of the total gallonage according to the Phase I estimate) and the amounts of the metal and cyanide contained in them were not verified in the market survey. About thirty shops had announced their intention to use the CRF by the May 1 deadline, but we have not yet seen the data on which waste streams will be pro- vided. The estimates in this letter are based on the earlier information, that is the late Phase I survey. I will discuss metals, cyanide, pH, dissolved solids., and sludges separately. The sewered flow from the CRF should average about 75,000 gallons per day for .the thirty shop case. At this flow the discharge of metals and cyanide to the sewers would be: MWCC Limit, lb/day lb/yr mg/l Discharged Discharged cadmium 2 (1) 1.2 (0.6) 310 (160) Chromium 8 (5) 5.0 (3.1) 1,250 (780) Copper 6 3.7 940 - _ _ Lead 1 0.6 160. - - - - - Mickel - -6 3.7 940 Zinc 8 5.0 1,250 Cyanide 4 2.5 620 The quoted limits are those for an industrial discharger and were given to me by Don Madore of the MWCC in a phone conversation the morning of 1983 February 14. He indicated that the cadmium and chromium limits might be lower because of Superfund, and this is shown in the table too. Regarding the question of whether the CRF can meet these metal limits-1 have attached a graph and table from an EPA publication (Lancy, R.E. and Rice, R.L., Waste Treatment Upgrading Metal-Finishing Facilities to Reduce Pollution, Environmental Protection Agency • Technology Transfer, July 1973, revised January 1974, EPA 625/3-13-002), but originally published in Germany. The graph seems to represent the EPA's official position and has been reproduced in many publications. It shows the lowest solubilities that can be achieved for segre- gated cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, and zinc salts in distilled water con- taining a. strong base. The table shows the effect of hard water. Note that even in hard water it is possible to meet the MWCC limits for segregated metal streams. The solutions -from the regenerated canisters are segregated and these represent about sixty percent of the flow. Most of the batch dumps also repre- sent segregated metal solutions although somewhat contaminated. There are, however, rinses and some batch dumps such as those from zinc chromating which may present a problem because they contain two or more metals and the the opti- mum pH for precipitation differs markedly for the different metals. In these cases two hydroxide precipitation steps or polishing with sulfide or ion exchange canisters will be used to meet the limits. There may also be dif- ficulties with certain streams containing chelating agents, such as electroless copper and electroless nickel . The chelating agents will be removed using acti- vated carbon if this is necessary to meet the limits. Lead has not been men- tioned here as the CRF may be handling lead only as already precipitated sludges containing copper, lead, and tin. Regarding the cyanide limit, it has been our intention to oxidize cyanide with chlorine, chlorine dioxide, or sodium hypochlorite. One should be able to assure complete destruction of cyanide by using a long enough detention time in the reactor and using a dose high enough to assure a small chlorine residual . The exact conditions required, however, will not be known until tests are done early in the design process. In various documents EPA seems confident that the limits can be met. It has been our intention to neutralize each batch of CRF wastewater to pH 7 before discharge. This will certainly meet the MWCC limits of pH between 5.0 and 10.0 at discharge. Neutralization of CRF wastewater will raise its dissolved solids content because the reaction product of sulfuric acid and caustic is sodium sulfate. I have already estimated the sodium sulfate discharge in my 1983 February 10 memorandum to Dan Shuster, which is attached. At 0.25 percent sodium sulfate the Central Facility's 75,000 gallons per day would contain about 1,560 pounds per day of sodium sulfate. This Mould increase the sodium sulfate concentration at Pig's Eye by about 0.6 mg/1. It should be noted (and is noted in the attached memo) that the 390,000 lb/yr .of sodium sulfate discharged by the CRF is about one third of what would be discharged if the individual shops installed their own pretreatment systems. .Regarding the `solid' wastes processed and produced by the CRF it is; of course, worth noting that metals will be recovered as part of this operation. This will reduce the burden on both Pig's Eye and hazardous waste land disposal sites. The following table shows the estimated amounts of metal recovered and disposed by the CRF in pounds per year: lb/yr 1. Total metals recovered 86,000 2. Metals processed but not 29,000 recovered (to land disposal or to Pig's Eye) ✓ 3. Metals in sludges processed 101,000 or handled (to land disposal ) 4. Total metals disposed, sum 136,000 of 2 and 3 S. Total disposed as hydroxides, 217,000 dry weight 6. Total disposed as sludge, 25 866,000 percent solids The estimated pounds per year of each metal recovered-are- shown in the following table: - - Cadmium 1,600 Chromium 16,900 Copper 12,200 Nickel 13,000 Zinc 42,720 TOTAL 86,400 The estimated assay of the CRF sludges, percent as metal., is shown in the following table: Cadmium 1.4 Chromium 2.8 Copper 5.3 or 5.4 Lead 0.4 or 0.5 Nickel 3.8 or 3.9 Zinc 1.6 to 1.9 This estimated assay ignores the following constituents which may also be present: sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, aluminum, iron, tin, fluoride, chloride, nitrate, phosphate, sulfate, and sulfide. It will not be possible to make an estimate of the -amounts of these constituents until late in the design process. Even -such an estimate should be verified by assays of the plant's sludge after start-up and shakedown because not all of the minor constituents in each bath of each shop will have been considered during design. Sincerely, Edward J. Co ay',* P.E'. Senior Chem i a1 Engineer, /' \ EJC/bl cc: project file 115.01 • Dan Shuster ATTACHMENT. ,Q BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 7901 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 119/ EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344/(612) 944-7590 September 6 , 1984 REFER TO FILE: 83-34-26 MEMORANDUM TO : Gar y 9 ,Dod e Metropolitan Recovery Corporation p FROM : James A. Benshoof q SUBJ : Traffic Information Related to Pr'opos.ed Central Treatment and Recovery Facility INTRODUCTION In response to your request , this report provides traffic information as input to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW ) that you are preparing for the proposed Central Treatment and Recovery Facility. Specifically , the purpose of this memorandum is threefold : 1 ) To describe the volume and routing characteristics of truck traffic generated by the proposed development . 2 ) To indicate the existing total traffic volumes on routes that would be affected by the projected truck traffic to/from the proposed development . 3 ) To assess the ability of the public roadway system to accommodate the projected development truck traffic . As you have indicated , the proposed development would be a newly constructed facility on the south side of Rose Place , a short distance from the intersection of County Road C and Walnut Street in the City of Roseville. Mr . Gary Dodge -2- September 6, 1984 VOLUME AND ROUTING CHARACTERISTICS OF TRUCK TRAFFIC GENERATED BY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT As you have indicated , . it is expected that the proposed deve- lopment would generate approximately 100 truck trip ends per day - 50 arriving at the site and 50 departing from the site . Since all the trucks operating to and from the facility would be under contract/lease by your company, you would have control over the routings that would b,e used . The intent in defining routings to be used is to recommend routes that pre- sently carry a large volume of truck traffic and furthermore to avoid usage of streets with abutting residential use . In this context , the primary routes that will be designated for truck trips approaching the site will be to/from the north on I -35W ( about 25 trips per day ) , to/from the west on I -35W ( about 45 trips per day ) , to/from the south on T. H. 280 ( about 15 trips per day ) , to/from the east on T. H. 36 (about 15 trips per day ) . For trips to/from the north on I -35W the designated routing will be I -35W , south to County Road C, west to Walnut Street , south to Rose Place , and east to the site . For trips to/from • the west on I -35W the designated routing will be I -35W , east to Industrial Blvd . , north to Walnut Street , east-northeast to Rose Place , and east to the site . For trips to/from the east on T.H. 36 the designated routing will be T. H. 36, west to I -35W , north to County Road C, west to Walnut Street , south to Rose Place , and east to the site . For trips- to/from the south on T. H. 280 the designated routing will be T. H. 280, north to Terminal Road , ' west to Walnut Street,, north to Rose Place , and east to the site . The proposed routings avoid streets with abutting residential use . • Mr . Gary Dodge -3- September 6 , 1984 ABILITY OF ROADWAY SYSTEM TO ACCOMMODATE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC The projected truck traffic as a percentage of existing total traffic volume is tabulated below. This information , together with the truck routings to be used , is shown in Figure 1 . New Truck Trips Projected Existing as a Percentage New Daily Volume of Existing Total Roadway Location Truck Trips 1983 Traffic Volume I -35W T. H. 88 East 45 69090 . 065 to T. H. 280 I-35W T. H. 36 North 15 68750 .022 to County Road C I -35W County Road C 25 63840 . 039 North to T.H. 88 T . H . 36 I -35W east to 15 50530 .030 T . H. 51 T . H. 280 I -35W south 15 40430 . 037 to 1 -94 Co . Rd . C I -35W west to 40 15000 ' . 27 T .H. 88 Walnut St . Industrial Blvd . 45 2170* 2. 1 north to Terminal Road I Walnut St . Terminal Road 60 2680* 2.. 2 north to Rose Place Terminal Rd . St . Croix St . 15 960* 1 . 6 west to Walnut Street St . Croix St . T.H. 280 north 15 4700* . 32 to Terminal Rd . * Values are from 1979 AvE . N E cn I u O IONA LA. ))V� AVE .N E � o• a 25 V ° ( . 04% ) 88 W 3: P TER. CRO 0 Z W -' 6`-` pW Z zy 4�R �. Y 4 6 Z M r 27% ) a `�v EAST v GAT RD. J 7 C s 136 W 94 IV. B. J pNTMQN'� OAKCREST N Lt'. Site o 35w 6 0 Lo ( 2. 2% ) a' W. cc 15 AL RD. O C ? 15 L j ( . 03% ) r Li � cn r d > r a Z Y w T Q Q 36 � Q a z 1= ei ipiF Rn v, 45 LEGEND ( 2 . 1 %) Routes Used by Truck Trips To/From Site 15 1 45 New Daily Truck Trips ,K WY• 280 15 . 04% ) c Generated By Development ( . 06% ) Percent Of Existing Total O Daily Volume 45 ( . 06% ) , RYA AvE. a \cn V) ` U (n 1 cn 5� 114 0 - 1000 , Approx . Scale METRO RECOVERY CORPORATION FIGURE 1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR CENTRAL TREATMENT AND DISTRIBUTIOJB RECOVERY FACILITY TRIPS GENER fTnAaNSPOVATAT�10N OF AND ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT (TANNIN(:AND ENGINEFnING CONSULTANTS 1. Mr . Gary Dodge -5- September 6 , 1984 The above data confirm that the new daily truck trips will have virtually no effect on the total traffic . In addition , the new daily truck trips are such that they will have negli - gible effect on the existing truck traffic . For example ,. County Road C presently has 860 truck trips per day . The . projected new daily truck trips (40 ) represent just a 4. 6 percent increase over the existing truck traffic . In light of these facts : 1 ) The small number of new truck trips generated by the proposed development , and 2 ) All of these trips would be directed along routes that presently carry a large volume of truck traffic , it is concluded that the public roadway system will effectively accommodate the projected new truck trips with no adverse effects .