Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 12081987 I I Meeting Sheet IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII 100599 Box: 18 Folder: CC PACKETS 1987-1989 Document: CC PACKET 12081987 I C I T Y O F S T . A N T H O N Y , P/E 12/08/87 A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E PAGE 1 VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK NO. TYPE DATE NO. AMOUNT 00020 AA BATTERY CO R 12/08/87 13839 50.71 00120 AMERICAN LINEN R 12/08/87 13840 37.20 00135 AMERICAN RISK SERVICES IN R 12/08/87 13841 377.00 00200 EARL ANDERSON ASSOC R 12/08/87 13842 73.62 00310 BATTERY E TIRE WHSE R 12108/87 13843 11 .70 00320 BEISSWENGER APPLIANCE R 12/08/87 1.3844 10.54 00400 BOYER FORD R 12/08/87 13845 116.71 006.30 COTTER CHARGE R 12/08/87 13846 300.59 00655 CLAREY' S SAFETY EQUIPMENT R 12/08/87 13847 112 .50 00800 DAVIES WATER` EQUIP I NC R 12/08/87 13848 177.31 00920 FEED RITE CONTROLS R 12/08/87 13849 113.70 00950 FIRESTONE TIRE CO R 12/08/87 13850 651 . 18 00970 FLASH FOTO R 12/08/87 13851 23.63 01025 GE K SERVICES R 12/08/87 13852 39.04 01060 GAREL ICK STEEL CC R 12/08/87 13853 31.25 01140 GENUINE PARTS CO R 12/08/87 13854 13. 93 01180 GOODIN COMPANY R 12/08/87 13855 13.64 01285 GRIFFIS OXYGEN R 12/08/87 13856 17.25 01360 HALLING BROS R 12/08/87 13857 2.7.64 01410 HARMON GLASS R 12/08/87 13858 159.04 01505 HENN CO SHERIFF R 12/08/87 13859 94.93 01601 INGMAN LAB R 12/08/87 13860 34. 00 02040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPER R 12/08/87 13861 76.55 02060 MB INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO R 12/08/87 13862 14.03 02100 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT CO R 12/08/87 13863 10.25 02130 MAMA R 12/08/87 13864 19. 20 02200 MEDICAL OXYGEN EQUIPMENT R 12/08/87 13865 76 .7.6 02560 NELSON OFFICE SUPPLY R 12/08/87 13866 18.86 02660 NORTHFIELD COMPANY R 12/08/87 13867 65.00 02720 NORWEST BANK MPLS NA R 12/08/87 13868 429955.60 02780 PAPER CALMENSON CO R 12/08/87 13869 968.88 02980 PROFESSIONAL PROCESSING C R 12/08/87 13870 885.01 03100 ROSEDALE CHEVROLET R 12/08/87 13871 26.40 03275 SCHUTTA' S HDWE INC R 12/08/87 13872 97.79 03315 SERCO LABORATORIES R 12108/87 13873 130.00 03355 SILVER LAKE CLINIC R 12/08/87 13874 156.00 03480 STATE TREASURER R 12/08/87 13875 317.27 03485 ST TREAS SURP PROP FUND R 12/08/87 13876 148.50 03490 STREICHER GUNS INC, DON R 12/08/87 13877 118 .85 0.3560 TRACY PRINTING R 12/08/87 13878 477.65 03645 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY R 12/08/87 13879 318.93 03670 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED R 12/08/87 13880 25.75 03735 WASTE MGMT R 12/08/87 13881 34 .50 0382.0 ZAHL EQUIPMENT. CO R 12/08/87 13882 178. 80 03840 ZEP MFG CO R 12/08/87 13883 63.95 05010 CONWAY FIRE R 12/08/87 13884 103 .00 0.5017 HENN CO TREASURER R 12/08/87 13885 1 ,006.25 06806 CALC-TYPE OFFICE EQ CO R 12/08/87 13886 94.00 06891 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOC INC R 12/08187 13887 45 .00 06954 ACE HARDWARE-COLUMBIA HGT R 12/08/87 13888 17. 57 i C I T Y O F S T A N T H O N Y P/E 12/08/87 A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E PAGE 2 VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK NO. TYPE DATE NO. AMOUNT 06955 BRIGHTON TRAVEL R 12/08/87 13889 520. 00 06956 MAMA R 12/08/87 13890 200.00 06957 INTIL ASSOC OF CHFS POLIC R 12/08./87 13891 50.00 06958 HENN CO CHFS OF POLICE R 12/08/87 13892 265.00 06959 ROAD RESCUE INC R 12/08/87 13893 15.36 06960 SROGA' S R 12/08/87 13894 63.90 06961 HERMAN' S MARKETING R 12/08/87 13895 168.00 06962 EMP R 12/08/87 13896 136.77 06963 ALEXANDER BATTERY NORTH . R 12108/87 13897 124.00 06964 WALMAN OPTICAL CO R 12/08/87 13898 302.34 06965 DAVE WILSON R 12/08/87 13899 50.00 06966 MICHAEL FANNON R 12/08/87 13900 50.00 06967 SARAH MC KIE R 12/08/87 13901 50.00 06968 HERMAN VICTOR R 12/08/87 13902 15.00 06969 BATTERY E TIRE WAREHOUSE R 12/08/87 13903 33.84 06970 ALMAC PLASTICS INC R 12/08/87 13904 31. 35 06971 THE AMERICAN STORES R 12/08/87 13905 22.37 06972 HARVEY MOEN R 12/08/87 13906 15 .00 06973 VERNON LUN0QU.IST R 12/08/87 13907 15.00 06974 J W WAGNER R 12/08/87 13908 15.00 • 06975 RONALD SEVERNAK R 12/06/87 13909 50.00 06976 -JUDITH GRAVES R 12/08/87 13910 50.00 06977 DIXIE PETRO CHEM R 12/08/87 13911 178. 40 06978 DUO-FAST R 12/08/87 13912 14.00 06979 INT 'L SALT CO R 12/08/87 13913 835.01 06980 SEELYE PLASTICS INC R 12/08/87 13914 43.00 06981 DATA CONTROL TEMPS R 12/08/87 13915 307.20 TYPE TOTAL 54,558.00 TOTAL 54, 558.00 AP[ _-ATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAW._. J AIA DOCUMENT G702 PAGE UNE OF PACES PROJECT: ARCI IITECT; (nan'ie, :d(c, ;s) St. Anthony Liquot Addition B W B R Architects . ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: J $ 'ro (Owner) City of St. Anthony CONTRACTOR: Fullerton Lumber Co. CONTRACT FOR; APPLICATION DATE: APPLICATION NO: —( ATTN: PERIOD FROM: I 17D)3 g TO CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet,AIA Document G702A, is attached. Change Orders approved ADDITIONS $ DEDUCTIONS $ in previous months by The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: Owner— TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM $ 288 500.00 subsequent Chanl;eorders ' ;lurnbrr Approved (dale) Net chan);e by Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ I l0 1 � 8� r� bh3 01 Log a SUM TO DATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .$ �`� I r •r=) 1-s TOTAL. COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE . . . . . .. . . . A35- 6 (Column G on G702A) TOTALS 00 RETAINAGE �%. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .$ c - �/ 7` � Nei change by Change Orders $ or as noted in Column I on G702A TOTAL EARNED-K-5S RETAINAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ ;'-233r' Slate of: County of: The undersigned Contractor certifies that the Work covered by this Appli- LE c�� RTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT . . . .. . . .$ L� cation for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract �. �\�ta �� ` Dnrumenls, That all amounts have been (raid by him for Work for which cj G'" N ",p% " previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from P fdN `�UE ,$. l the Owner, and that the current payment shown herein Is now due. l jO PA �Q,<05 . -_Yk �� yl �5 �3e��LCd and sworn to before me 11 //�day of �jjr��, 19 Cunha \ r; � / MVP rNulary'Prnbbc: � � J. 6Ltat.t/ r 0 Z jrrr�- My Commission cxpir s: ih a✓ �y y� Dale: In accordance with ile Contract and this Application for I aymenl the Contractor is enlilled to payment in the amount shown above. ❑ OWNEF, Architect: ryj ARCHITECT ❑ CONTRACTOR ny: 1� ❑ This CeuiGcarr. is not ne,r Liable, It is ayahle oily In the payite named herein and its issuance, Isayrnl till acceptance are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner r❑ir Contractor under Iheir Contract. A I A 1)0(U,\IINr G7r12 V AIIIIII('ATI( IAN (711t111'lCAIr I()1t VAYkiINT • MA ItCI1 1')71 1'l)IIION • AIA ) ^� 1971 . Ill) AhilkI :AN INS711111E O Cllllt(.IS, 173, NI,W Y1)lil: AVE., N.W.,WASIIIN(;rON,U. C. 21)1)04 1 s CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 PAGE OF PAGES APPLICATION NUMBER: I-1 AIA Document G702,APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing APPLICATION DATE: I Ll ) R'J Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below',amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. PERIOD FROM: 1 O ?, 1 _ . Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. TO: I �!, ' L-I ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: A [t C D E F G I( WORK COMPLETED TOTAL COMPLETED BALANCE ]::RETAINAGE ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED This Application AND STORED % TO FINISH No. VALUE Previous TO DATE (G-Q (C—GI Stored Materials (D+E+rl Applications Work in Place („ol in D or r:) Genera]. Conditions I.0 ,500 "O 8 5 I)� � v 8 � � � 3 180�� �I 3 Exc. U Delllo, Related 24,000 v lo b � I �o Concrete, D-lasoniy Fi �-3d° 3 '-i ,3 OCR +o o L7 I / cj lZelated 34 ,300 ► , <-D o,`�D Structural Steel 20,900 Steel Erection 5,400 �", c�`> 5 , w 00 I o 0 0 2 O �I (R (0 Q Labor 4,800 I LI n C70 1 5c. Material Ext. Wall. Finish, 18,200 I ,OOC`� , o G 2 hoofing-t'l -laclated 14 ,900 0) ,3 o; ) o I 1-1`1 Doors I:] Hardware 3,100 ` cC:�G Alm Entrance F, Doors . 7,700 C7 Uv Automatic Doors t; -3 ° Related Sheetrock F, Steel Studs I O �AvU F, Related 11,200 S , V�.-'c? a c I (f7 nQ 'Trans. Panel. Systeln 4,1100 3, RC+�: 3 12 011D 8Co � Ors 1 '1 Resilient Floor V00 C—) Painting 4 ,500 Fire Exti.ngui slier s 200 Dock Equipment m)ent 250 �S c7 ,--;.� Solariwn Mechanical. F; Related 38,SUO C�U Electrical. F, Related 34,500 Supervision - 34 ,150 S o I C) C) Qp Profit F1 Overhead a 3 I o 3 i A's (fl L-1 c� v��C� 1 a L4 �U AIA DOCUMENT 0703 CONTINUATION SHEET APRIL ;1976 E01110N AIRS O 1974 G703—197B THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AST., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 C 2 TY O F S T _ AN T H ONY C OUN C= L. AGENDA D E C EMB E R 8 1 9 8 7 7 _ 30 P - M - A. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. C. Approval of November 24 , 1987 Council Minutes. D. Licenses/Permits/Petitions . - - E. Presentation of Claims. 1 . Verified. 2 . Bruce A. Liesch Associates - $5 , 272 . 67 . 3 . Dorsey & Whitney - $2 , 565 . 69 . 4 . Metropolitan Waste Control Commission - $24 , 896 . 08. 5 . Hance & LeVahn - $2 , 200 . 00 . 6 . Fullerton Lumber Co. - The new Police Reserves will be introduced by Police Chief Hickerson. F. Reports . 1 . Planning Commission a. Mickey D' s Sign Variance Request. b. Rapid Oil Change Sign Variance Request. C. American Monarch Concept Review. 2 . Departments and Commissions. a. Hance & Levahn, re : matters conducted at the Hennepin County District Court on November 8 , 1987 . b. Liquor Operations Monthly Sales Summary - November, 1987 . C . Police Department Monthly Report - October, 1987 . 3 . City Manager . a. Staff Meeting Notes - December 2 , 1987 . b. Planning Commission Vacancies ( 3 vacancies because J. Wingard moved to Prior Lake) . C . Update on TCAAP Litigation. • d. Vacant Lot on Silver Lake Road. -2- G. Public Hearings. H. New Business. 1 . Purchase of Marked Squad Vehicle. 2 . Resolution 87-041 , re: Memorandum of Understanding With School District #282. 3 . Resolution 87-042 , re: St. Anthony Boulevard Improve- ments ( south end) . 4 . Community Survey Questionnaire Review - representatives from Decision Resources Ltd. will be present. I . Unfinished Business. J. Adjournment. : cjk • • C= TY Off' ST e ANTHONY l C OUN C = L M 3 NUT'E S �t NOVEMBER 2 4 0 1 9 8 7 1 The meeting was opened at 7 : 35 P.M. with the Pledge of Allegiance led -2: by Mayor Sundl.aric =: 3 Present for roll call: Marks , Ranallo, Sundland, Enrooth, Makowske. I i 4 Also present: David Childs , City Manager 5 William Soth, City Attorney ' i 6- NOVEMBER 10 , 1987 COUNCIL MINUTES 7 Motion by Marks , seconded by Enrooth to ,approve with the. following 8 changes: 9 Page 5 , line 32 : Complete "before" at end of line. 10 Page 7 , line 12 : Correct typo "had" after "Childs" . 11. Motion carried unanimously. . 12 LICENSES%PERMITS/PETITIONS 13 Motion by Ranallo, seconded- by Marks to grant. a contractors license to �4 the V.P.M. Corporation in Minneapolis , as listed in the November 24th �5 agenda packet. 16 Motion carried unanimously. 17 CLAIMS 18 Motion by Marks , seconded by Ranallo to approve payment of all liquor 19 and City accounts payable listed for October 31st in the November 20 24th Council agenda packet with the exception of the six payments to 21 Cindy Carpenter, on which the Manager will check and. report further at 22 the next meeting. 23 Motion carried unanimously. 24 Motion by Ranalio, seconded by Makowske to approve .payment of $4 ,000 25 to Rieke Carrol Muller Associates for engineering services on the 26 Kenzie Terrace traffic . signal through October 31st. 27 Motion carried unanimously. 28 Motion by Marks , seconded by Enrooth to approve payment of $556 . 00 in 29 dues to the National League of Cities for membership from February 1 , 30 1988 through January 31 , 1989 . 31 Motion carried unanimously. • .� 1 . 1. Motion by Makowske , seconded by Marks to approve payment of $2 , 392 . 50 2- to BWBR Architects for administration services on the liquor warehouse 3 addition through October 21st to be paid from the Liquor Fund. 4 Motion carried unanimously. 5 Motion by Ranallo, seconded....-by Enrooth to approve Change Order 02 for 6 $693 . 00 to include a ten day contract extension to Fullerton Lumber on 7 the above addition, as presented by the City Manager. . 8 Motion carried unanimously. 9 Motion by Marks , seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $2 , 847 . 39 10 to the Briggs and Morgan law firm for professional services provided 11 in connection with the City' s - lawsuit against the U. S. Army et al 12 related to St. Anthony' s water contamination problems. 13 Motion carried unanimously. 14 Consultant ' s Bill To Be Submitted Later 15 Mr. Childs indicated he had held up a bill from Bruce Liesch As- 16 sociates for their services in preparing expert testimony related to 17 the above litigation because he had asked the attorneys to provide a 18 memo detailing those costs . 19 AGENDA ADDENDUM • 20 Councilmembers had been provided with copies of the November 24th 21 "Summary of Concerns" from the Brighton Village Homeowners Associa- 22 tion related to the development of common areas in the townhome 23 project on Old Highway 8 , which was presented by the Association Board 24 President, Norm Arne, and Secretary, Arne Sorlien. Staff was r"e- 25 quested to work with the Association and to keep the Council informed 26 related to those negotiations . 27 REPORTS 28 COUNCIL 29 Enrooth Reports Attendance at Very Informative Water Conference, 30 November 19th and 20th 31 The Councilmember indicated he perceived the other Councilmembers 32 would have the same interest in the proposals for funding storm sewers 33 and 509 projects as he had and said he would therefore be sending 34 around the materials related to those subjects which he had brought 35 back with him from the meeting in the Earle Brown Continuing Education 36 Center on the St. Paul Campus. 37 Ranallo Proposes Sharing Insurance Trust Refund with Employees 2 • 1 Councilmember Ranal' o indicated he had learned at the- League of 2 Minnesota Cities Boa{'d meeting the previous Tuesday that the League ' s 3 Insurance Trust in which St. Anthony is •a participant, had been able 4 to save 1 . 2 million dollars last year, a good portion of which could 5 be attributed to the loss prevention programs adopted by most of the 6 municipal participants . The City had been issued for ' 'a check for 7 $5 ,700 and Mr. Childs indicated he expected future checks would 8 probably exceed the $15 , 000 Councilmember Ranallo had• estimated. 9 Perceiving these funds would never have been possible without the 10 strong safety measures undertaken by City employees to keep the 11 claims down, Councilmember Ranallo said he would like to see them 12 share in some of the money which had already been sent and he 13 suggested that if the City Attorney' s research showed it would be 14 legally permissible , $750 be spent towards food purchases for the 15 employees ' Christmas party, December 13th. 16 Carol Johnson, the City' s Finance Director, was present to provide 17 input towards other matters on the agenda and she indicated she agreed 18 with Mr. Childs that this indication of the Council ' s appreciation for 19 employees ' efforts would be well received. 20 The suggestion was greeted with enthusiasm by the other Councilmembers 21 who perceived that since the City is unable to give bonuses and safety 22 award programs had not yet been established, this would be one way of �23 letting the employees know their efforts were really appreciated. 24 Council Action 25 Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Marks as a token of the Council ' s 26 appreciation of employees ' efforts to keep insurance claims down, to 27 direct $750 of the League Insurance Trust refund be spent to under- 28 write part of the costs of the employees Christmas Party, December 29 13th. 30 Motion carried unanimously. 31 Marks Continuing Planning and Zoning Institute Service 32 He had the opportunity of conducting the government training seminar 33 in New Ulm last week and the Councilmember reiterated the schedule of 34 institutes which would include training sessions at the Earle Brown 35 Continuing Education Center on the St. Paul campus in which he would 36 be involved during December and January. 37 DEPARTMENTS AND COMMITTEES 38 *The October Financial Report was ordered filed without comment. 39 *During the consideration of Prosecutor Hance ' s November 10th 40 report on matters his firm had handled for ' the City at Hennepin �1 County District Court, November 4th, Councilmember Marks drew 3 i I.. attention to the ,number. of bench warrants issued for non-appear- • 2 ance, saying they averaged three per day in this report. He 3 also found the number of complaints filed by the St. Anthony 4 police,:;_to..._b.e "incredible - The....-Hance & LeVahn, Ltd. re.p_.ort-was 5 then ordered filed for future - reference. 6 Council Perceives Too Many Problems Involved in Allowing Pull Tabs in. 7 City r 8 Because the City' Attorney' s services were only required in conjunction 9 with the continuance of discussions about amending the City' s charita- 10 ble gambling ordinance and the Lions Club proponents were present, the 11 Mayor , with the Concurrence of the other Councilmembers , moved the 12 matter up on .the agenda. 13 The existing ordinance had originally been adopted in response to 14 proposals that a professional fund raiser operate a Bingo Hall to 15 include the sale of pull tabs on behalf of a consortium of charitable 16 organizations, including the March of Dimes and Sister Giovanni ' s 17 activities in St. Paul. 18 Since that time , the Council had . received written requests to amend 19 the ordinance to allow the sale of pull tabs in municipal liquor 20 stores from the St. Anthony Lions Club and the Hennepin County Humane 21 Society. The St. Anthony Boosters Club had verbally requested the • 22 same from Mayor Sundland. In the meantime, members of the Lions Club 23 had vigorously lobbied each Councilmember at home -­_-:"and the 24 organization' s President, Ken Girard, as well as Lions members Oscar 25 Norgren and Wes Henry, were in attendance for further input to the 26 discussions . 27 The Mayor recalled for the benefit of those present that the City of 28 Minneapolis had officially accepted this form of charitable fund 29 raising recently and said Ray Nelson, the City' s Liquor Manager, had 30 indicated he perceived the activity might benefit his operation. 31 The legal ramifications of � having pull tabs sold in municipal liquor 32 stores had been fully explored in memoranda from both the City 33 Manager and Attorney, which had been included in the Council ' s October 34 22nd agenda packet. However , a decision had again been deferred for 35 further information from the Lions Club related to the international 36 organization' s activities in Kenya, which had been of particular 37 concern to Councilmember Makowske. 38 Mr. Soth added to the information he had previously given by saying: 39 *if the Council simply approved the sale of pull tabs in 40 St. Anthony, Minnesota law would permit any applicant to get a 41 license from the state unless' a resolution against. that license 42 were adopted within 30 days ; • 43 4 •1 *however, - that veto power .would. have- to, be supported by very 2 good reasons for denying a license to only that applicant; 3 *the City could conceivably establish regulations and restric- 4 tions to limit the locations; and even restrict the operations 5 to local organizations, but the basis for those distinctions 6 would have to be specifically defined, not arbitrary. 7 Councilmembers acting as "devil' s advocates" proposed various worst 8 case scenarios related to what could happen if the pull tab sales were 9 restricted to municipal on-sale liquor stores . 10 Ranallo: wondered if the two bowling alleys where the City. permits 11 the sale of 3 . 2 beer would question the City' s allowing 12 pull tabs to be sold only in their own on-sale establish- 13 ments. 14 Childs: indicated he had given some thought to that happening and 15 had concluded 3 . 2 beer did not meet the qualifications for 16 alcoholic beverages which the City desires to control by 17 restricting sales to only municipally operated facilities; 18 said the same argument could probably be made related to the 19 Council ' s desire to control gambling activities by limiting 20 such operations only to locations which the City controls. 41 Soth: agreed that the City might be able to legitimately argue 22 that it would only be in municipally run locations that the. 23 City could oversee gambling operations ; but 24 another interpretation might be made that St. Anthony was 25 limiting the operation* to its own facilities for its own 26 gain. 27 Sundland: suggested the response to that interpretation would probably 28 be that state law already established that rents which the 29 City may charge may not exceed those which would be reason- 30 ably charged for the square footage the pull tab operation 31 used and not based on a percentage of the profits. 32 Soth: said he didn' t think the issue was quite that simple because 33 someone might then make the argument that by restricting the 34 operation to only municipally run facilities , St. Anthony 35 might be trying to circumvent the law which says the City 36 can' t issue a license for the sale of pull tabs . 37 Childs: said he understood New Brighton had restricted the pull tab 38 operations to only on—sale and not 3 . 2 facilities in their 39 city, which- include charitable organization restaurants and 40 41 bars :as well as private es.tablishments..which are licensed to 02 sell liquor. 5 J 1 Ranallo: asked whether the City could limit the causes which would be 2 supported b pp y pull tab profits to only those which benefit 3 St. Anthony citizens. 4 Soth: told him the law had just been amended to prevent cities 5 from "requiring an organization to make specific expendi- 6 tures of more than ten percent from its net profits derived 7 from lawful gambling. 8 Enrooth: said he understood the City could only direct that ten per- 9 cent stay within the municipality but could not specifi- 10 cally direct to which cause it would go. 11 In view of the above restrictions, Councilmembers indicated their 12 intent related to changing the ordinance as follows: 13 Marks: perceived the Councilmembers had already made an ordinance 14 decision that to avoid giving only one or a few organiza- 15 tions the right to conduct charitable gambling in the City, 16 it would be better just to say "no" to all of them; and 17 he personally thought that should be the Council ' s stand 18 at this time no matter what pressures are applied or what 19 good causes are involved. • 20 Enrooth: perceived the control the City could have would be only 21 minimal in terms of groups -or numbers because there would 22 most likely be at least ten different local groups who 23 would qualify for licenses from the state while the City 24 would only be able to contract with one or two of these 25 if pull tab sales were restricted to only the two municipal 26 on-sale operations; 27 added that the Council had just made a substantial financial 28 investment towards upgrading the atmosphere in the Stoneho- 29 use and he could not see where pull tabs would lend themsel- 30 ves towards improving that image ; 31 said he had not changed the perception he had when the 32 Council had originally taken a stand against pull tabs that 33 11this type of activity would not be one I want to see in 34 St. Anthony. " 35 Ranallo: indicated he understood the most "lucrative locations for 36 pull tabs right now were bowling alleys and he anticipated j 37 the owners of the two City alleys would be questioning the 38 City' s decision t.o keep the operations in their own facili- 39 ties; j 40 • 41 perceived the City would probably be facing the same diffi 42 culty saying no to an organization once this type of 6 :•1 �-ac'tivity is allowed. in the City, :as -it now faced refusing 2 to let ' an amusement arcade go into Apache with the Fun 3 Center operating in another shopping .center; . . i 4 questioned whether the City might not be discriminating. 51 against what is perceived to be a desirable thing for .. 6 St. Anthony, the non-alcoholic Alternative bar, when. it 7 restricted the pull tabs to the municipal liquor establish- 8 ments; 9 concluded that the ten percent the City would get to keep 10 was not worth the hassle the City might expect to get from 11 very worthy applicants, including the City' s own Fire 12 reserves . 13 Makowske: agreed with Councilmember Marks that the whole process of 14 making a decision related to pull tabs had been ."a very 15 painful one" ; 16 said she had gone from "not liking them at all" to being 17 educated. to see them in a different light after attending 18 the Ramsey County League of Local Government' s meeting where 19 she had come to see that there might be some very worthy 20 organizations and causes which would gain from pull tab 21 profits ; 02 reported she had also almost been convinced by the Lion 23 Club members she talked to that this might be an easy way 24 for the City to make more money, which had been reaffirmed 25 by the Liquor Manager , saying this type of activity might be 26 helpful to his operation; 27 however, after realizing how little control the City would 28 actually have over how the profits are spent, changed her 29 mind and was now leaning towards voting against the pro- 30 posal. 31 Girard Insists 50% of Pull Tab Profits Would Stay In St. Anthony 32 When Mayor Sundland asked the Lions members whether they had. anything 33 new to add to what they had already told the Council which might 34 change what he perceived would be at least a 4 to 1 vote against their 35 proposal, the Lion Club President said: 36 *although the City might only be able to make 10% of the. profits 37 through rents , there was nothing in the state amendment which 38 would prevent the Lions Club from giving St. Anthony 50% of the 39 .profits the club members had already agreed should remain in 40 St . Anthony; 01 7 1 *said that money' could' underwrite projects like.' upgrading the playgrounds installing-installing . lights- on the softball. diamonds , or any . •. 3 other improvements the City.. wants to make but • • can ' t:.budget for; . •: 4 *indicated their own budgets were also limited at this time- and. 5 the profits from the pull tabs cold be used to augment many of 6 the local projects the Lions wanted to do more in; F 7 *argued further that most of ,the profits used for improvements 8 in St. Anthony would come from bar patrons who live outside the } 9 City. 10 When Mr. Girard said he had been told the City had the right to 11 direct by ordinance which organizations it preferred, ,Mr. Soth told 12 him the City couldn' t just arbitrarily choose the Lions Club over 3 13 other organizations who had indicated an interest, but would first 14 have to establish a class or category with criteria which would have 15 to be met by anyone who fell within that category. 16 17 Councilmember Ranallo indicated that, if that was the case. he 18 - perceived it . might be difficult to refuse, an organization whose cause 19 might not be perceived to be good for the community. 20 Mayor Sundland told Mr. Girard he guessed the Council would have to 21 take the advice of the City Attorney which was based on research they 22 had asked him to do six weeks ago. He reiterated that there was 23 probably no use asking for a motion which four of the Councilmembers. 24 had again indicated- they would be voting against. He therefore ruled 25 that the Council would not be entertaining a change to allow pull 26 tabs in Ordinance 1987-001 . 27 Mr. Girard asked that the Lions Club be included with other organiza- 28 tions to be considered if the ' Council ever changed its mind, reiterat 29 ing that he continued to believe such action would benefit the City 30 just as much as his organization. 31 Mr. Soth left the meeting at 8 : 30 P.M. 32 CITY MANAGER REPORTS 33 November 17 , 1987 Staff Meeting Notes 34 *Hamer Hopes to Get St. Anthony Boulevard Striped This Week 35 The Manager said the Public Works Director is trying to get 36 Ramsey County to do that work right away 'so the state engineer 37 can give final approval to the reconstruction project once that 38 is accomplished. 39 *Manager Directed To Prepare Proposal for Goal Setting Sessions 40 in February • 8 • .1; The Government Training Service offer to facilitate the above 2 -- had been- included in the agenda packet as a reminder - that pre 3- pa-tations' should be made . soon. Mr . Childs indicated he would 4 summarize what the- 1986 - session had cost and accomplished -and 5 would contact the various facilitators Councilmembers had indi- 6 cated as soon as the Council had decided what the thrust of the 7 sessions should be. He requested Councilmembers let him know 8 which dates they had open for these meetings. 9 Impending Legislation Reported During Mayors Association Meeting, 10 November 18th .11 Mr. Childs said he had represented the Mayor at the above meeting 12 where the North Suburban Mayors Association members had been informed 13 that legislation addressing the costs counties incur with tax incre- 14 ment projects: was being considered for the next legislative session. 15 Problems with soil corrections in this type of projects would also be 16 considered, he, said. 17 No Action Taken Regarding Ramsey County Library Issue 18 There was no interest on the Council for getting involved in the 19 controversy about where the new library would be sited in spite of 20 the request from the Shoreview Mayor that St. Anthony support his 21 City' s position with the County Commissioners. 12 Childs Guardedly Encouraged After Meeting with Army in Washington, 3 D. C. , November 19th 24 This was the first time the . Army representatives had specifically 25 discussed the costs of the damages St. Anthony had suffered from 26 TCAAP groundwater contamination, the Manager said. He indicated the 27 fact that the Army . was now asking to . see specific documentation 28 related to the City' s long term costs and indicated he perceived 29 their willingness to meet with City representatives in the near future 30 to discuss those hard figures might just possibly mean the Army 31 might at last be ready to settle with the City. He cautioned the 32 Council about being too optimistic, however. 33 First -of. Modeling Equipment for Carbon Filtration Plant Expected to 34 Arrive Next Day .35 Although the proposed carbon filtration plant would probably not be 36 fully operational next summer, Mr. Childs said indications now are 37 that there was a chance at least some of the equipment would be 38. delivered by then and work would be underway." He also reported that 39 the modeling equipment is expected to arrive on November 25th and . 40 installation of this test equipment would start on December lst. He 41 indicated it had taken some real effort to overcome some of the snags 42 which had occurred in the process.. The . Manager was thanked for all 43 he had done to get the project started. • 9 i i 1 NEW BUSINESS • 2 Council ' Adopts Resolution Approving budget .Transfer " for City Office 3 Remodeling 4 Motion by Marks, seconded by Ranallo to adopt Resolution 87-037 . 5 RESOLUTION 87-037 6 A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE 1987 BUDGET 7 Motion carried unanimously. 8 City to Take Advantage Perceived Benefits of Investing in LMC' s Money._ E 9 Market Fund - 10 The Manager explained why he thought the City would be better .able 11 to enhance its investment . earnings by joining with other Minnesota 12 municipalities in the above program to be supervised by the League 13 Board of which Councilmember Ranallo is a member . I I 14 Council Action 15 Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Marks to adopt Resolution 87-038 . 16 RESOLUTION 87-038 • 17 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO A JOINT POWERS- 18 AGREEMENT IN THE FORM OF A DECLARATION OF TRUST 19 ESTABLISHING AN ENTITY KNOWN AS "MINNESOTA 20 MUNICIPAL MONEY MARKET FUND" AND AUTHORIZING 21 PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN INVESTMENT PROGRAMS 22 IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 23 Motion carried unanimously. i 24 Councilmember Makowske left the meeting at 8 : 45 P.M. to visit her 25 husband in the hospital. i 26 Council Agrees with Finance Director ' s Recommendation Not to License 27 Condo and Apartment Laundry Facilities, r 28 Mr. Childs summarized Mrs . Johnson' s November 19th memorandum, . which 29 the Council accepted as an addendum to the agenda, to mean staff had 30 changed its mind about "breaking ground" by licensing the above when i 31 the survey she had taken indicated there were very few communities who ' 32 included this type of licensing in their current fee schedules. No 33 Council action was deemed necessary. 34 Councii Concurs With Decision to Break Away from Hennepin County' s 35 Health Insurance Program • 10 .. , 1' Finance Director 'Johnson. :told: Councilmember. Marks. because.-of .its cost, 2' ' she was recommending this one .time- use . of LOGIS to -.get -the City. into 3 the government.-informati.on systems for' part-icipation in. the new health ;4 - insurance consortium formed. —for that purpose after .the`: County dropped . 5 Physicians Health plan from its program. 6 Mr. Childs reported the background history of how the consortium had 7. been formed, indicating he agreed with Mrs. Johnson' s November 19th 8' ' memorandum recommending execution of the resolution and agreement for 9 membership in- the new group. - He indicated one paragraph in the 10 agreement would be modified to reflect the City Attorney' s concerns 11 about costs . 12 Council Action 13 Motion by Ranallo, ,seconded by Marks to adopt Resolution 87-039 which 14 authorizes the execution of the joint powers agreement to participate 15 in LOGIS to coordinate employee health care planning and serve 16 selection with the modification as recommended by the City Attorney. 17 RESOLUTION 87-039 18 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE 19 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT GOVERNING LOCAL 20 GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (LOGIS) �1 BY THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 22 Motion carried unanimously. 23 Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. Attain Selected to Maintain and 24 Administrate the City' s 1988 MSA Fund 25 Before taking action on the above, the Manager drew the Council ' s, 26 attention to the fact that the costs for the above service had not 27 gone up since at least 1983 . 28 Council Action 29 RESOLUTION 87-040 30 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL 31 FROM SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. 32 FOR ADMINISTRATION AND MAINTENANCE OF 33 CITY' S 1988 MSA FUNDS 34 Motion carried unanimously. 35 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 36 Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Marks to approve the third . reading and 37 adopt Ordinance 1987-006 . • 11 ORDINANCE- 1987.-006 2- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA, STATE BUILDING CODE:. 3 .. PROVIDING FOR ITS ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT: 4 REGULATING THE ERECTION,­CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, 5 ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, 6 OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND MAINTENANCE OF 7 ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY: 8 PROVIDING PENALTI-ES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF: AMENDING 9 SECTION 310 : 00 OF THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE 10 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY AND ALL OTHER ORDINANCES AND 11 PARTS OF ORDINANCES -IN CONFLICT THEREWITH 12 Motion carried unanimously. 13 Council to Hold Only One Meeting in December, Unless Special- Meeting 14 is Required for Contract Award on Pedestrian Signal 15 16 The .Council will decide whether a December 15th meeting is required 17 for the above at their December 8th meeting, when they will also 18 cancel the December 22nd meeting because of its proximity to the 19 holidays . 20 ADJOURNMENT 21 Motion by Marks , seconded by Enrooth to adjourn the meeting at 8 : 57 • 22 P.M. 23 Motion carried unanimously. 24 Respectfully submitted, 25 Helen Crowe, Secretary 26 27 Mayor 28 ATTEST: 29 City Clerk 30 :cjk 12 o le JAT _ �? AP-PnOVAL : December a, 1987 Ma or and Councilmembers I'F",OM s Lila Johnson, License/Billing clerk EM LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL CONTRACTORS Schmieg & Washburns (E.S. I . Signs) , St. Paul St. Paul Utilities, Inc. , Hugo VPM corporation, St. Anthony q :cjk12.8.87 1 C I T Y 0 F " S T e A N T H O N Y L I 0 U 0 R • P/E 11/20/87 A C C -0 U N T S P A Y A B L E PAGE 1 VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK -.. N0. TYPE GATE NO. AMOUNT 04005 ACRD-MI NNE SOTA INC R 11/20/87 09769 10.1E 04009 AETNA LIFE E CASUALTY R 11/20/87 09770 415.92 04015 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO R 11/20/87 09771 385.69 04033 AUGIES INC R 11/20/87 09772 71.22 04080 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION R 11/20/87 09773 100.00 04095 COCA COLA BOTTLING R. 11/20/87 09774 19413.60 04108 DANS REGISTER SERVICE R 11/20/87 09775 248.40 04110 DICKSON ELECTRIC R 11/20/87 ' 09776. 947.00 04125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO R 11/20/87 09777 219327. 75 04135 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC R 11120187. 09778 201.00 04144 FRITO-LAY INC R 11/20/87 09779 199.23 04145 GAN-ZER DISTRIBUTORS INC R 11/20/87 09780 119746.00 04195 HAPPYS POTATO CHIP CO R 11/20/87 09781 167.80 04205 HOME JUICE CO R 11/20/87 09782 121 .14 04208 ICMA R 11/20/87 09783 20.00 04218 JOHNSON PAPER E SUPPLY CO R 11120/87 09784 524.05 04230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO R 11120/e7 09785 219560.56 04250 LYSTADS R 11120187 09786 228.39 04265 MARK VII SALES INC R 11120/87 09787 209699.29 • 04266 MARKET MECHANICAL R 11/20/87 09788 906.17 04270 MELS VAN-O-LITE R 11/20/87 09789 226.32 04290 MINNEGASO R 11/20/87 09790 354.22 04293 MINN BAR SUPPLY R 11/20/87 09791 39330.50 04335 NORTHERN STATES POWER R 11/20/87 09792 29709.31 04338 NORTH STAR ICE R 11/20/87 09793 424.4C 04340 NW BELL TELEPHONE CO R 11/20/87 09794 462.85 04345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC R 11/20/87 09795 57.81 04355. PEPSI COLA/7 UP BOTTLING R 11/2C/87 09796 609.45 04374 POPCORN UNLIMITED R 11/20/87 09797 76.00 04378 PROFESSIONAL PROCESSING R 11/20/87 09798 269.34 04380 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMNT R 11/20/87 09799 18.GC 04390 REX DISTRIBUTING CO R 11/20/87 09800 189268.60 04396 ROYAL CROWN BEV R 11/20/87 09801 166.80 04415 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO R 11/ 20/87 09802 96.44 04450 STUART DISTRIBUTING CO R 11/20/87 09803 411.95 04460 SUNDERLAND INC R 11/20/87 09804 396.67 04463 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG CO R .11/20/87 09805 444.80 04470 TOMBSTONE PIZZA R 11/20/87 09806 82.4C 04480 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE R 11/20/87 09807 50.40 04481 T9aIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY R 11/20/87 09808 269.86 04491 UNITED NAY R 11/20/87 09809 39.00 04492 WASTE MANAGEMENT R 11/20/67 09810 308.50 06190 SP LAKE PK LUMBER R 11/2C/e7 09811 585. 64 06271 SCHUTTAD S HDWE R 11/20/87 09812 18.54 06378 H E ERICKSON CO INC R 11/20/87 09813 26.85 • 06399 LANGFORD TOOL S DRILL R 11/20/87 09814 50.55 06400 MB IND SUPPLY R 11/20/87 09815 6. 54 06401 MINN TILE SUPPLY R 11120187 09816 555.89 06404 STEWART LUMBER CO R 11/20/87 09817 84. 75 06405 RADIO SHACK R 11120187 09818 15.95 C I T .Y O E S T .' A N 'T H 0 N Y L I 0 U 0 R P/E .11/20/87 A C C O U N T S P. A "Y A B L E Pi GE 2 VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK NO. TYPE CATE NO. AMOUNT 06424 RENT ALL MINN R 11/20/87 09819 31.80 06434 HIRSHFIELO' S R 11/26/87 09820 40.20 06437 GOLDEN VALLEY SUPPLY CC. R 11/20/87 09821 29486.42 06441 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS R 11/20/87 09822 178.00 06443 GOTTWALT PRODUCTS R 11/20/87 09823 540.14 06459 NORTH CENTRAL SALES S SER R .11/20/67 09824 32.00 06472 BUSINESS CREDIT LEASING R 11/20/87 09825 135.62 06484 b J WHITE CO R 11/20187 09826 29. 70 06491 MPLS BRASS LTD R 11 /20/87 09-827 19481.48 06501 BUILDING TRADES JOURNAL R 11/20/87 09828 149.50 06503 ARSENAL SAND INC R 11/20/87 09829 12. 60 06504 J C AUTO SUPPLY R 11/20/87 09830 20.15 06505 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR R 11120/87 09831 150.00 06506 MN CONWAY FIRE C SAFETY R 11/20/87 09832 S6.0C 06507 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY R 11/20/87 09833 12.00 06508 LUANNE DOELZ R 11/20/87' 09834 . 32.36 06509 WALTER R HAMMOND CO R 1..1/20/87 09835 6.00 TYPE TOTAL 1179225.71 • TOTAL 1179 225. 71 • . 'U '� A BRUCE A. LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC. GROUNDWATER GEOLOGISTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS November 4 , 1987 TO: Mr. David Childs FROM: Bruce A . Lies.ch Associates , Inc . RE. T . C .A . A . P . STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT Date of Statement Client Balance Due : October 5 , 1987 City of St. Anthony $ 990 . 94 November 4 , 1987 Cite of St.. Anthony $ 5 , 272 . 67 CU'fYeM November 4 , 1987 ' David McDonald $ 5 , 272 . 67 • TOTAL AMOUNT DUE : $ 11 , . 28 PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE-DETAILED BILLING SUMMARY ATTACHED • ' BILLING 'STATEMENT ^ ' ' BILLING DATE: 11/04/87 ` BRUCE A. LIESCH ASSSOCIATES, INC. ` 'CONSULTING HYDROLOGISTS*PROFESSI NAi� 'GEOLOGISTS*ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISITS ' 3020 HARBOR LANE / MINNEA O` IS, MINNESOTA 55441 / (612)' 59-1423 DAVID CHILDS CIT . MANAGER ` 3301 SILVER LAKE ROAD ` PROJECT: T. CiA. A. P. ST. ANTHONY, MN 55418 706800 TIME COMPLETE TOTAL TOTAL FEE FEES & THIS THIS EXPENSES ! PROJECT PERIOD PERIOD DIRECT COST THIS PERIOD ____________ 706800 194. 75 10413. 00 $132. 34 $10,545. 34 ' / / - ' ' ' TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $ 10,545. 34 NET TERMS: 30 DAYS PLEASE PAY AMOUNT IN LAST COLUMN ~~ ' ' ' BILLING STATEMENT ' BILLING DATE 11/04/87 BRUCE A. -LIESCH- ASSOCIATES , INC. CONSULTING �HYDROLOGISTS*PROFESSIONAL `GEOLOGISTS*ENyIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS '`3b20- f7iARBQR LANE / M'INNEApOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 / (612) 559-1423 MR. DAVID CHILDS CITY MANAGER ` 3301 SILVER LAKE ROAD PROJECT: T. C. A-. A. P. ST. ANTHONY, MN 55418 PROJECT NO. 706800 ` TASK JOB TASK DATE NO. DESCRIPTION TIME EMPLY RATE TOTAL ---------- ---- ------------------------- ------ ----- ------ ------- | 10/06/1987 1700 REPORT PREP. 0. 50 KPO3 $70. 00 $35' 00 10/06/1987 1210 MEETING 1 . 00 KP03 $70. 00 $70. 00 10/07/1987 1330 PHONE W/LIBRARY 0. 25 JM3 $50. 00 $12. 50 10/09/1987 1907 INTERNAL PROJECT ANALYSIS 0. 25 JM3 $50. 00 $12. 50 10/ 11/1987 1700 REPORT PREP. 1 . 50 KP03 $70. 00 $105. 00 10/12/1987 1700 REPORT PREP. 2. 25 KPO3 $70. 00 $157. 50 10/12/1987 1905 COORDINATE REPORT PREP. 0. 75 KP03 ' $70. 00 $52. 50 10/12/1987 2010 WORD PROCESSOR 2. 00 KA $19. 00 $38. 00 � 10/13/1987 1908 INTERNAL PROJECT DISCUSSI 0. 25 DAN5 $50. 00 $12. 50 10/ 13/1987 1908 INTERNAL PROJECT DISCUSSI 1 . 75 KP03 $70. 00 $122. 50 10/13/1987 1309 MAPS 1 . 00 CH2 $25. 00 $25. 00 10/13/1987 2030 COMPUTER 0. 75 JJ1 $19. 00 $14. 25 10/13/1987 1402 COMPILATION OF DATA 1 . 25 DAN5 $50. 00 $62. 50 ( 10/13/1987 1603 GEOLOGIC DATA REVIEW 1 . 50 DAN5 $50. 00 $75. 00 10/14/1987 1324 PHONE W/CLARENCE OSTER 0. 50 CH2 $25. 00 $12. 50 10/14/1987 1908 INTERNAL PROJECT DISCUSSI 0. 50 DAN5 $50. 00 $25. 00 10/14/1987 1309 MAPS 5 00 CH2 $25 00 $125 00 . ' . 10/14/1987 1302 CROSS SECTION 1 . 50 DAN5 $50. 00 $75. 00 10/14/1987 1905 - COORDINATE REPORT PREP. 1 ' 00 1::*P03 $70. 00 $7O. 00 10/15/1987 1700 REPORT PREP. I . KP03 $70. 00 $70. 00 10/15/1987 1309 -MAPS 8. 25 CH2 $25. 00 $206. 25 10/15/1987 1302 CROSS SECTION 5. 00 DAN5 $50. 00 $250. 00 10/15/1987 1600 DATA ANALYSIS 0. 50 DJ1 $50. 00 $25. 00 10/15/1987 1905 COORDINATE REPORT PREP. 1 . 50 KPO3 $70. 00 $105. 00 � 10/16/1987 1908 INTERNAL PROJECT DISCUSSI 0. 25 JEN2 $50. 00 $12. 50 10/16/1987 1309 MAPS 3. 75 CH2 $25. 00 $93. 75 10/16/1987 1214 DATA CORRELATION 5. 50 JEN2 $50. 00 $275. 00 10/16/1987 1302 CROSS SECTION 2. 00 DAN5 $50. 00 $100. 00 10/16/1987 1606 WATER QUALITY DATA REVIEW 2. 00 CH2 $25. 00 $50. 00 10/ 16/ 1987 2030 COMPUTER 1 . 50 DJ1 $50.00 $75. 00 10/16/1987 1905 COORDINATE REPORT PREP. 0.50 KP03 $70. 00 $35.00 10/16/1987 1402 COMPILATION OF DATA 1 . 25 DAN5 $50. 00 $62. 50 10/ 19/1987 190B INTERNAL PROJECT DISCUSSI 0. 25 DAN5 $50. 00 $12. 50 10/19/1987 1302 CROSS SECTION. 1 . 75 DAN5 $50. 00 $87. 50 10/19(1987 1904 COORDINATE DATA ANALYSIS 0. 50 KP03 $70. 00 $35. 00 10/19/1987 1402 COMPILATION OF DATA 1 . 00 DAN5 $50. 00 $50. 00 10/20/1987 1908 INTERNAL PROJECT DISCUSSI 0. 50 ' DAN5 $50. 00 $25. 00 10/20/1987 1302 CROSS SECTION 4. 75 JEN2 $50. 00 $237. 50 10/20/1987 16V6 WATER QUALITY DATA REVIEW 0. 75 KP03 $70. 00 $52. 50 10/20/1987 1402 COMPILATION OF DATA 0. 50 DAN5 $50. 00 $25. 00 10/21/1987 1701 DRAFT REPORT 6' 25 KPO3 $70' 00 $437. 50 10/21/1987 1302 CROSS SECTION 3. 75 JEN2 $50. 00 $187. 50 10/21 / 1987 1601 DATA REVIEW 0. 50 JEN2 $50. 00 $25. 00 10/21/1987 1194 EQUIP. /SAMPLING/PICK UP/D 0. 50 JEN1 $19. 00 $9. 50 10/21/ 1987 1802 SECRETARIAL 1 . 50 JJ1 $19. 00 $28. 50 10/22/1987 1908 INTERNAL PROJECT DISCUSSI I . DAN5 $50. 00 $50. 00 10/22/ 1987 1302 CROSS SECTION 6. 25 JEN2 $50. 00 $312. 50 10/22/1987 1318 PHONE W/DR. GREGG 0. 25 KPO3 $70. 00 $17. 50 ' BILLING STATEMENT � � `� � ' 'BILLING DATE 11/04/87 BRUCE A. LIESCH: ASS8CIATES, INC. CONSULTLNG HYDROLOGISTS*PROFESSI8NAL .GEOLOGISTS*ENVIRONMENTAL� SCIENTISTS 3020 HARBOR LANE / MINNEAPOLIqz MINNESOTA' 55441 / (612) 559-1423 J � �R DAVID CHILDS CITY MANAGER . � 3301 SILVER LAKE 'ROAD ` PROJECT: T. C. A. A. P. ! � ST. ANTHONY, MN 55418 PROJECT NO. 706800 � TASK JOB TASK � | DATE NO. DESCRIPTION TIME EMPLY RATE TOTAL | ---------- ---- ------------------------- ------ ----- ------ ------- ! 10/22/1987 1904 COORDINATE DATA ANALYSIS 0. 50 KP03 $70. 00 $35. 00 10/23/1987 1701 DRAFT REPORT 1 . 50 KPO3 $70. 00 $105. 00 10/23/1987 1710 REPORT REVIEW/REVISIONS 2. 00 BAL4 $84. 00 $168. 00 10/23/1987 1800 REPORT EDITING 3. 00 BAL4 $84. 00 $252. 00 | 10/23/1987 1904 COORDINATE DATA ANALYSIS 0. 75 KPO3 $70. 00 $52. 50 10/23/1987 1209 MEETING PREP. 0. 50 KPO3 $70. 00 $35. 00 10/23/1987 1601 DATA REVIEW 1 . 00 JEN2 $50. 00 $50. 00 10/26/1987 1606 WATER QUALITY DATA REVIEW 3. 75 KPO3 $70. 00 $262. 50 10/26/1987 1600 DATA ANALYSIS 5. 00 3EN2 $50. 00 $250. 00 10/26/1987 1800 REPORT EDITING 2. 00 BAL4 $84. 00 $168. 00 10/26/1987 1401 DATA COLLECT/COORDINATION 1 . 25 3EN2 $50. 00 $62. 50 10/26/1987 1202 PHONE W/ATTORNEY 0. 50 KP03 $70. 00 $35. 00 10/26/1987 1210 MEETING 3. 75 KPO3 $70. 00 $262. 50 10/27/1987 1301 LOCATION MAPS 2. 25 JEN2 $50. 00 $112. 50 10/27/1987 1701 DRAFT REPORT 2100 KPO3 $70. 00 $140. 00 10/27/1987 1701 DRAFT REPORT 4. 00 KPO3 - $70. 00 $280. 00 11127/ 1987 1318 PHONE W/DR. GREGG 0. 50 KP03 $70. 00 $35. 00 /27/ 19B7 1600 DATA ANALYSIS 3. 00 JEN2 $50. 00 $150. 00 10/27/1987 1610 COORDINATE DATA REDUCTION 1 . 00 KP03 $70. 00 $70. 00 10/2711987 1203 PHONE W/REGULATORY AGENCY 0. 25 DJ1 $50. 00 $12. 50 ` 10/28/ 1987 1701 DRAFT REPORT 2. 50 KP03 $70. 00 $175. 00 10/28/1987 1904 COORDINATE DATA ANALYSIS 0. 50 KP03 $70. 00 $35. 00 10/28/ 1987 1225 AFFIDAVIT-REVIEW/REVISE 1 . 00 BAL4 $84. 00 $84. 00 10/28/ 1987 1401 DATA COLLECT/COORDINATION 3. 25 JEN2 $50. 00 $162. 50 10/28/1987 1202 PHONE W/ATTORNEY 0. 50 KPO3 $70. 00 $35. 00 10/28/198' 1802 SECRETARIAL 3. 50 JJ1 $19. 00 $66. 50 10/28/1987 2010 WORD PROCESSOR 2. 75 KAE $19. 00 $52. 25 10/29/1987 1701 DRAFT REPORT 9. 50 KPO3 $70. 00 $665. 00 10/29/1987 2008 PICK UP/DELIVERY 0. 25 DJ4 $19. 00 $4.75 10/29/1987 1225 AFFIDAVIT-REVIEW/REVISE 2. 00 BAL4 $84. 00 $168. 00 10/29/1987 2010 WORD PROCESSOR 0. 50 KAE $19. 00 $9. 50 10/30/1987 1300 GRAPHICS 1 . 50 D32 $25. 00 $37. 50 10/30/1987 1301 LOCATION MAPS 2. 25 JEN2 $50. 00 $112. 50 10/30/1987 1309 MAPS 1 . 00 CH2 $25. 00 $25. 00 10/30/1987 1701 DRAFT REPORT 2. 50 KPO3 $70. 00 $175. 00 10/30/1987 1904 COORDINATE DATA ANALYSIS 0. 75 KPO3 $70. 00 $52. 50 10/30/1987 2008 PICK UP/DELIVERY 0. 75 ' D34 $19. 00 $14. 25 10/30/1987 1401 DATA COLLECT/COORDINATION 5. 00 JEN2 $50. 00 $250. 00 10/30/1987 1402 COMPILATION OF DATA 1 . 50 DJ1 $50. 00 $75. 00 10/30/1987 1802 SECRETARIAL 2. 00 JJ1 $19. 00 $38. 00 10/30/ 1987 1802 SECRETARIAL 1 . 50 SEC $19. 00 $28. 50 10/30/ 1987 2010 WORD PROCESSOR 3. 50 KAE $19. 00 $66. 50 11/31 / 19B7 1202 PHONE W/ATTORNEY 0. 25 KPO3 $70. 00 $17. 50 /01/1987 1700 REPORT PREP. 7. 25 KPO3 $70. 00 $507. 50 11 /01 /1987 1210 MEETING 5. 75 KP03 $70. 00 $402. 50 11 /02/ 1987 1700 REPORT PREP. 8. 00 KPO3 $70. 00 $560. 00 ====== ======= 194. 75 $10, 413. 00 j PROJECT DIRECT COST SHEET. E BILLING D A T Er..e 11/04/87 DATE PROJEC-1 ACTIVITY COST EMPLOYEE 10/06/87 706800' PARKING $2. 25 KPO 10/06/87 70680() POSTAGE $0. 78 ji C 10/19/87 7068 0C) COP 1 ES'. $17. 81 CH 10/21/87 706801) _... TOTAL MILES $0. 70 _E N 10/21/87 706800 MEESENSEF' $9. 55 KPO 10/21 /87 70680'., NEESENGEF,' 114 ,115 10/28/87 706800 POSTAGE. $0. 22 KAE 10/29/87 70680,0 4 TOTAL MILES $1 . 40 Di 10/30/87 706BOC) 8 TOTAL MILES $2. 80 Di 11/01/87 64 TOTAL MILES $22. 40 KPO I 1132. 34 oil ( i I I i i I • o . DORSEY 8C WHITNEY .2200 FIRST BANK 111-ACE EAST • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402, (01 iZ 1 :340-'2000 (Internal Revenue Account No. 41.0223337) STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES November 30, 1987 Mr . David M. Childs City Manager City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 Re : City of St'. Anthony For legal services rendered from October 1, 1987 , through October 31, 1987 , including: Attend October 13 Council Meeting: $1.48. 00 Attend October 27 Council Meeting: $222 . 00 Matters regarding Stonehouse renovations, including telephone conferences with R. Nelson regarding the Lease and the responsibilities between the parties for the costs of improvements; review letter re insurance claim and send letter to D. Childs; send letter to City re denial of insurance claim for storm damage ; telephone R. Nelson re Lease; telephone R. Nelson re storm damage, send letter to R. Nelson and D. Childs re same ; telephone attorney for Manning' s re Lease revisions, telephone R. Nelson re same; review Manning' s Lease changes ; send letter to Council ; telephone conference with R. Nelson re Lease changes; telephone attorney for Manning' s ; telephone conference with R. Nelson and D. Childs re Lease to Manning' s ; prepare exhibits ; send letter to attorney for Manning' s ; finalize Manning' s Lease; telephone conferences with R. Nelson; telephone Larry Manning re Lease ; review changes in Lease ; telephone conferences with R. Nelson and L. Manning re same ; finalize Manning ' s Lease : $1, 063 . 75 LIQU09- I)ishursements made I'm your account, for which bills have not yet been received,will appear on a later statement. NEY DoRSEY & WHIT A,P­­.­,­,w l­-.,uwu.l•wnrra.,nwni.('nwn.w.iiuws 20c.> FIRST }SANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESO'T'A 83402 t 012 I :340-2000 I (Internal Revenue Account No. 41-0223337) STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 2 - Investigate possible avenues of obtaining payment for checks cashed by the Village Liquor Store for employees of Advance United Expressways Inc . ; legal research regarding subrogation to employee priority; j and prepare draft of Proof of Claim: $ 266. 25 u4UoR f Advise City Manager regarding the City' s charitable II gambling ordinance; inter-office conference re charitable gambling issues ; draft letter to Council regarding same; telephone Councilmembers re pull tabs ; inter-office conference re charitable gambling problem; legal research re City' s power to regulate charitable gambling and regarding proprietory versus governmental function; and finalize and send letter to Council re same.: $ 603 . 75 Review agenda matters and minutes for meetings on October 13 , 1987- and October 27 , 1987 ; advise City Manager regarding conditional use permit for amusement arcade ordinance, proposed weapons ordinance, preparation of ordinance re State Building Code, and review of Animal Control Contract: $ 298. 75 TOTAL FEES : $2 , 602 . 50 PLUS DISBURSEMENTS (as per attached sheet) : 54 . 19 'TOTAL FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS: $2, 656. 69 WRS:gle 615 178820 : 47 , 56, 77 , 1000 i Disbursements made for your account, for wahich bills have trot yet been received,will appear on a later statement. f1(1ETROPOLITAn METROPOLIT�IIV 'WASTE UJAITE CONTROL COMMISSION CONTROL mmmiffion TwinCities Rrea 350 METRO SQUARE BUILDING ST. PA JL, MN 55101 PHONE (612) 222-8423 CITY OF ST ANTHONY ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 3301 SILVER LAKE ROAD ST ANTHONY MN 55418 INVOICE 11/01%87 0022475-000 DECEMBER 0004902 INVOICE.DATE. CUSTOMER ACCOUNT NUMBER MONTH INVOICE No. .. v AMOUNT 401 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 24,896.08 TOTAL: 24,896.08 Due on the first day of the service month. Installments :not received by.the 10th day of each month in which due shall be regarded as delinquent and shall bear interest from the 'first day of such.month at the rate of 18% per anum. As per laws of :Minnesota 1985, chapter. 136: • LAWOFFICES - STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT J HANCE & LEVAHN �AINT ANTHONY NATIONAL BANK BUILDING,SUITE 200 DATE: December 1, 1987 2401 LOWRY AVENUE NORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55418 Mr. David Childs PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION .WITH YOUR REMITTANCE. City Administrator City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road (M) St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418 a AMOUNT REMITTED $ RE: Village Prosecutions DATE DESCRIPTION ,`" ° ° © $ 4,400.00 PAYMENTS Received $2,200.00 on 11-3-87 2,200.00 CR CREDITS & ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENTS UNPAID PREVIOUS BALANCE P ' FINANCE CHARGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,200.00 Legal Services rendered for the month of December, 1987, relative to St. Anthony prosecutions. CURRENT FEES y °A. dye,{ u.,,,.•�� ,P - '4I� �.�' ��.�.qq,qq,,��pppp.. MINIMUM PAYMENT DUE $ o-91 Q00-0o • Accounts due upon presentment of statement.A FINANCE CHARGE at a periodic rate of 1-1/3%per month,equaling an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE of 16% will be imposed upon any Unpaid Previous Balance greater than $1.00, with a minimum FINANCE CHARGE of$0.50.The FINANCE CHARGE is applied to the outstanding balance at the end of each billing cycle,if the balance for that billing cycle was not paid in full within 30 days. NOTICE: See reverse side for important information. HANCE & LEVAHN f • C T TY OE' ST e ANTHONY NOVEMBER 3 0 0 1 3 8 7 1 The meeting was opened at 7 : 30 P.M. with the Pledge of Allegiance led 2 by Chair Franzese. I 3 Present for roll call: London, Hansen, Wagner, Franzese, Werenicz , 4 Madden. 5 Also present: David Childs , City- Manager. 6 MINUTES 7 September 15 , 1987 Planning Commission Minutes 8 Motion by Wagner, seconded by Hansen to approve as presented. 9 Motion carried unanimously. 10 November 4 , 1987 Special Planning Commission Minutes �1 Motion by Hansen, seconded by Wagner to approve as presented. 12 Motion carried unanimously. 13 November 17 , 1-987 Planning Commission Minutes 14 Motion by Werenicz , seconded by Wagner to approve with the following 15 changes: 16 Page 8 , line 6 : Strike "to be" after "considered" . 17 Page 8 , line 26 : Substitute "east" for "west" at end of line. 18 Motion carried unanimously. 19 MADDEN TO REPRESENT. COMMISSION AT DECEMBER 8TH COUNCIL MEETING 20 PUBLIC HEARINGS 21 Confusion Over Staff Direction Prompts Commissioners to Recommend Only 22 One Sign Variance for Mickey D' s Restaurant 23 Testimony had been taken during the public hearing on the request from 24 Michael Farrell for the necessary variances to the City Sign Ordinance 25 to allow three signs on the remodeled Mickey D' s Restaurant at 2905 26 Kenzie Terrace. However , because there was a lack of quorum of 27 Commissioners to make a , decision, the hearing was continued to the i8 November 30th Commission meeting. 1 Manager :Indicates sign Erected on- Front of Restaurant Since Hearing Is•. • ' 2 41 Square Feet Larger Than City Ordinance Allows 3 The Chair continued -the November 17th hearing at 7 : 42 P.M. by 4 requesting a staff report on the issues which were involved. 5 Mr. Childs said he understood the sign company had come to see Mr. 6 Hamer the day following the hearing when the Manager was not in his 7 office and the Building Inspector had issued a .permit for an 82 square 8 foot sign based on calculations the sign company had made that they 9 needed 42 square . feet . for "Mickey" ; 6 square feet for "D" ; 4 square 10 feet for " ' S 10-1/2 square feet for "Family" and 19 square feet for 11 "Restaurant" . 12 The Manager then read that portion of St. Anthony' s Sign Ordinance 13 which states that signage should be calculated on the square footage 14 of the rectangle enclosing all the sign lettering, which in this case, 15 he said would bring the sign surface up to 1.41 square feet, 41 square 16 feet more than the Ordinance would allow for this building with 17 approximately 50 feet of frontage and calling for a variance of that 18 much for the sign. 19 As he had stated at the hearing, the Building Inspector had consulted 20 him about the signage early in October when the applicant were in Mr . 21 Hamer ' s office. Without knowing the front dimensions , Mr . Childs said 22 he had advised Mr_. Hamer the building would be allowed 2 square feet 23 for every front foot. If the applicant wanted to keep the roof sign or 24 put additional signage on the side of the building in addition to the 25 front sign, he would have to apply for variances for that additional 26 signage because the City Ordinance only allows one sign per business 27 with sometimes a variance for a second sign granted for a corner 28 business . 29 The November 17th minutes indicated that Tim Gow, the - sign represen- 30 tative that evening, had given the Commissioners a drawing of an 8 X 8 31 foot sign reading "Mickey D' s" which the applicant wanted to put up 32 over one side of the "Mr. Hobo" roof sign and had been specifically 33 informed that sign surface should actually be 6-4 square feet, accord- 34 ing to the ordinance calculations and not 27 square feet as indicated 35 in the October 30th letter from his company. 36 The minutes had also indicated that Commissioner Werenicz , noting .the 37 discrepancies between what appeared to be a 200 square foot sign from 38 the drawings submitted by the sign company and the applicant ' s 39 testimony that much .less signage was being requested, as well as the 40 disputed size of the roof sign, had suggested the applicant and his 41 . sign . company sit- down with staff to ascertain just what would 42 constitute acceptable signage for .St. Anthony. 2 Mr . Childs recalled' specifically suggesting -to the -applicant that c, because the City in the past - had granted 'a variance for a second sign (VI 3 fora corner business;.' he might want to split the copy he was propos 4 ing for the front sign :into two separate signs with a -3 X 20 foot ( 60 5 square feet) "Mickey D' s" sign to be put up on the -front of the 6 building and a 2 X 20 foot ( 40 square feet) ."Family Restaurant" sign 7 could be placed on the east side since both signs would meet the 8 total 100 square feet of signage the ordinance allowed a building 9 within a 50 foot frontage. 10 The Manager reported he had noticed the front sign was already up when 11 he returned from his Washington D.C. trip and when he looked for 12 permit in the files found a drawing for a front sign which was 13 designated as having 82 square feet and on which Mr . Hamer had written 14 "sign per sketch, 82 square feet, one sign on front of building" 15 before signing. 16 Mr. Childs indicated he was not aware of any municipal ordinance in 17 any city which allowed signage to be calculated the way E.S. I . had 18 calculated the dimensions of this sign ad said he thought most sign 19 people knew that was not the way to calculate signage. He also 20 recalled that Mr. Farrell and the sign company representative had 21 been specifically advised that the City ordinance did not allow 22 signage to be calculated that way during the hearing. 463 _Gow..Tes.tifies Not Unusual _fo.r._ City Ordinances .to. Allow Signage to Be 4 Calculated The Way He Does It 25 Tom Gow, who had signed the October letter to Mr. Hamer specifying 26 what signage was being requested for the restaurant, said it had been 27 he and not his brother , Tim Gow, who had appeared with Mr. Farrell 28 November 17th, who had worked with Mr . Farrell on his sign package.. 29 He also said it had been he who had met with Mr. Hamer early in 30 October and it was during' that meeting that "calculations for the 31 front sign were made for each word specifically and how the sign 32 would be laid out was clarified for Mr. Hamer" , leading to the 33 Building Inspector approving the permit for the sign November 18th. 34 He explained that this type of business sign consists of internally 35 neon lighted columns , known as "channel lettering" ,- and, in fact, each 36 letter is a fixture which can be considered to be a sign in some 37 cases. He recognized that this differed from the City Ordinance as 38 stated by the City Manager , but wanted it understood that the original 39 calculations were made "under the supervision of Mr. Hamer" . 40 Mr . Farrell said before he had signed a check for $5, 000 for that one 41 sign he had personally gotten verbal assurance from Mr . Hamer that it 42 was O.K. Mr . Gow added that the Building Inspector had also told them 43 the new copy on- the roof sign and the reader board on the east 44 required variances for which they had applied and paid the required 45 fees. 0 i l The sign company representative indicated he thought his October 30th, 2 letter to Mr . Hamer-' accurately described the specific i-terns he was . 3 -looking for in this- particular business . He added that ,t,-ie size of A* the letters was -determined' from a' chart designating - what. size 5 characters would be required to attract . business from the local. 6 traffic which was the real reason these variances were so important to 7 the owner. 8 When Commissioner Hansen asked whether Mr. Gow hadn' t thought it -might 9 be unusual to compute signage surface by -lettering, including the 10 apostrophes, Mr. Gow indicated it was typical for other cities to use 11 channel letters, especially for malls in the Twin Cities where signage 12 is a continuous band and signage is calculated by words identifying 13 individual tenants . 14 Commissioner .Werenicz told him he- failed to see the connection between 15 mall signs and signage for an isolated building. 16 Mr. Gow said he would check his files for the names of other cities 17 whose ordinances calculated signage in this manner but when pressed by 18 Commissioner Hansen, gave the names of Blaine and Moundsview. The 19 sign company representative also conceded that "individual words were 20 usually measured and it might be unusual to measure the "D" and " ' s" 21 , separately as was done in this case. Mr. Farrell reiterated his 22 experience in the restaurant business and said he had "actually 23 turned around one million dollar business" , so certainly knew how 24 important signage was . 25 When Commissioner Hansen questioned why if signage was so important, 26 they had waited until the last thing to bring the sign package to the 27 City, Mr. Farrell indicated he had checked with Mr . Hamer the first 28 day he walked into .the building to take it over, "either October 1 or 29 2 , " having already gone to 7 other sign companies for estimates before 30 that time. Mr. Gow said they already had the sign package decided. on 31 when- they first saw Mr. Hamer and had ordered the signs , which took 8 32 weeks to make , right after the interview, sometime around the first or 33 second of October. 34 Applicant to Drop Reader Board but Perceives Roof Sign Important 35 Mr . Farrell indicated the "vibrations" about the sign being "tacky" , 36 etc. he had gotten at the hearing had convinced him that he would 37 probably have to "eat" the $1 , 200 he had spent on the reader board for 38 the east side. He said he was therefore only looking for a variance 39 that evening for a sign which would "replace the ' Mr. Hobo ' atmosphere 40 from that area. " 41 He indicated the sign surface had "been cleaned up and painted over to 42 look much better and was now requesting to put up the "Mickey D' s" 43 sign 'to face away from the neighborhood. He reiterated that the sign 44 "'would be much less signage" and would give off less light for the 45 closest home in which the previous Mr . Hobo owner lives . 4 41 -Mr. Farrell indicated he had "already spent $100 ,000 fixing the 2 building up"• and' said ' he would .,have never spent that kind of money 3 .without believing he would get adequate signage. Mr. Gow indicated he 4 'perceived the Commission should take the fact that the signs were 5 made locally, weren' t "chintzy and were "the best in the country" 6 when deciding on the variance. 7 *No one else was present to provide further input and the Chair 8 closed the hearing at 8 : 09 P.M. for development of a recommendation to 9 the Council. 10 Franzese: perceived the applicants had negotiated in good faith for 11 the front sign which is already up; 12 indicated it might be a matter of educating staff further 13 regarding the sign ordinance so miscommunications related to 14 signage could be avoided in the future; 15 said as she saw it, by ordinance calculation, there were 16 already 141 square feet of signage where the ordinance only 17 allows • 100 and the applicants were now asking_ for a variance 18 for an additional 64 square feet by the City' s calculations , 19 27 by their own; reiterated that the community was glad to see the new rest- aurant come in but there was a definite conflict with the 22 Sign Ordinance. 23 Madden: said he felt if the applicants were given approval for 82 24 square feet of signage by their calculations unless there ' s 25 a reason for doubting their word, the Commission should 26 start from that premise. 27 Childs : indicated he had confirmed that 82 square feet was what Mr . 28 Hamer had approved with the permit dated November 18th, the 29 day after the hearing; 30 again read the City Ordinance which he thought sign com- 31 panies usually consulted before proposing signage; 32 considering that the drawing for the roof sign talked about 33 borders , etc . , indicated he thought the Commission had to be 34 considering a variance for 64 square feet of signage; 35 reiterated that the notice of the hearing had said 27 36 square feet of roof signage based on the sign company' s 37 October 30th letter, but the drawing for the 8 X 8 foot 38 sign had not been. seen before Tim Gow distributed it at the 39 hearing and told exactly how the City Ordinance would 40 calculate the surface. • 5 i I Gow: interjected that Mr .-.Hamer had seen the drawing of the 2 sign drawn to scale but- without dimensions indicated on...it. . . J 3 Wagner : agreed -that the Commission had to accept the front sign as 4 a -."legal approved" sign but did not have to agree it was 5 "an 82 square foot sign, but rather whatever size our' 6 ordinance says it is. " 7 Madden: said that was right, but in considering a variance, "the . 8 City had to consider 82 square feet is up there now. " ; 9 agreed 64 square feet in addition to the 82 would be "too 10 much" but didn' t have a firm feel for approving or dis- 11 approving a variance for a second sign. 12 Werenicz : found it "irritating" that this was almost a repeat of what 13 happened at the Dairy Queen where a businessman had spent 14 money on signs based on erroneous information from a City 15 official; 16 indicated he would consider the existing sign to be 141 17 square feet, which exceeds the City Ordinance and not 18 grant a variance for any more signage. 19 Wagner: agreed the existing sign might be a "legal" sign which is 2p 141 square feet, according to our ordinance and therefore • 21 more than the 100 square feet allowed that business , making 22 it "in effect a variance, and all we should grant for .this 23 building. " 24 Hansen: agreed with that assumption, saying .he had driven all around 25 the area and perceived the exposure is there and saw no 26 location from which identification would be missing; 27 said signage would be a key factor in the redevelopment of 28 that particular area and the city was in fact talking about 29 decreasing the amount of retail which would be replaced . with 30 housing; 31 indicated he perceived it would be a mistake to start in- 32 creasing signage from what the ordinance allowed now . and 33 could be a detriment to the new development -going into the 34 shopping center ; 35 concurred that an error had been made but said he didn' t 36 find the sign which had gone up to be offensive. But stated 37 does find the pylon structure on the roof offensive even 38 without signage. 39 London: generally agreed with Commissioners who have said the Com- 40 mission should acknowledge this to be a legal sign which is 41 already approved by the City Building Inspector ; . 6 •1 perceived the City's options were limited by the -fact the 2 sign is already .up. and paid for ; j 3 . .,. wouldn' t vote to - bring the signage any further .over the • f 4 amount allowed by the ordinance; 5 said he would approve the sign as it sits and that would 6 be it. 7 Wagner : said he could go along with staff ' s recommendation to split 8 the front sign into two signs with one put on the east -side 9 if the owner really felt the need for two exposures. 10 Hansen:: indicated he could go along with that suggestion; 11 added that if the sign company had taken more time for more 12 discussions with the City, that could have been done from 13 the start, eliminating some of the work which is already 14 done. 15 Franzese: agreed the City had to accept the front sign as .approved, 16 however, perceived the Commission' s charge was also to 17 encourage commercial activity; and 18 19 perceived there might be a need for signage on the east 00 side as well as the front of the building to catch the 1 attention of anyone driving south on 88 or coming across 22 the bridge from St. Paul who cannot see the sign which is 23 already up; 24 25 but did not see the need for the big sign on the top 26 because any sign on that side of the building would have 27 visibility; 28 believed that whether moving the words "Family Restaurant" 29 to the east side, or what, some identification was neces- 30 sary within the realm of helping them do a good business 31 and succeed in that location. 32 Childs : : reiterated for the benefit of the sign company representa- 33 tive that the way he saw it was that -the Planning Commission 34 had met on the 17th and discussed fully just how the ordin- 35 ance would calculate the square footage on the drawing they 36 had presented for the.. front sign, pointing out to them . that 37 -i perhaps their calculations were wrong and the next day - they 38 went in and applied for a permit for a sign, using the 39 same calculations . 40 41 indicated he was willing to take the responsibility for 42 the staff error and for handling it with the Building • 7 1 ' 'Inspector but wanted the record .to .show there had been full 2 discussions- on the. sub.ject the prior evening. • 3 Franzese : indicated she had the same recollections and was just trying 4 ' to bend over -a bit to let the proprietors know the Commis- 5 sion was glad to have them in the community. 6 Hansen:- said from reading the minutes , he agreed that the applicants 7 had ignored the Commission' s recommendations• to clear the 8 matter up before putting up the sign. 9 Werenicz : asked whether the restaurant would be open �to splitting. the 10 front sign to put "Family Restaurant" on the east side for 11 better exposure because he would be opposed to recommending 12 anything else on the side as long as they retained the 13 signage on the front. 14 Mr . Farrell said he "would have to tear down the whole front to do 15 that and it would cost him $17 , 000 to tear down the existing pylon 16 sign on the roof , and it would only cost about $2 , 300 to put the 17 proposed sign up instead. He said he had not even connected the front 18 sign -yet because "the pylon is where all the power is" . He told 19 Commissioner Werenicz the letters in the front sign are specially 20 constructed to connect to the mansard roof . 21 During the development of a motion the City Manager indicated he 22 perceived that the fact that the permit had been granted in error 23 would not make the front sign a non-conforming sign, and, even though 24 there had been a staff error in this - case, a variance to allow the 25 excessive signage to remain would probably be in order. Mr. Childs 26 recalled that case law had already ruled that administrative error 27 didn' t make something legal or necessarily make the City liable .for 28 the error . He therefore disagreed with Commissioner Madden that a 29 variance was unnecessary. 30 The Manager also pointed out that he knew the Commissioners didn' t 31 intend to let the Dairy Queen keep all the signage the owner con- 32 tended had been approved by someone in the City offices without a 33 variance and it would not now be fair to treat this business any 34 differently. Mr. Childs told Mr. Farrell the copy on the pylon could 35 not be considered to be "grandfathered in" since it had been turned 36 off a long time now since the restaurant had been closed. 37 Commissioner Hansen told Commissioner Madden he perceived the Commis- 38 sion would have protested the excessive signage even if .no further 39 variances were sought . 40 Commission Recommendation 41 Motion by Werenicz ,, seconded by Wagner to recommend to the Council 42 that a variance be granted to the business known as "Mickey D' s 43 Family -Restaurant." at 2905 Kenzie Terrace for the signage which has 8 • 1 already been erected on the front .portion .of :the building for the 41 •2 square feet .over .the 100 square : feet the. City Sign Ordinance allows = 3 that building and- that no additional variances be granted. f'br . addi- 4 tional signage on the structure. 5 Motion carried unanimously. i 6 Before the applicants left, . Mr. Childs clarified the question of the 7 pylon sign further by telling them that since :the ordinance only 8 allowed them one sign when they got permission to. put up the front 9 sign, that : was given in lieu of the roof sign and the reader board 10 for which they had been advised they would have to seek variances. 11 They had, ' in effect, ' given up their right to keep the pylon sign when 12 they put up the front sign. 13 Welcome Reiterated 14 Commissioners Hansen and Wagner told Mr. Farrell they were glad to 15 have such a good business replace the unsuccessful one which had 16 previously been in that location and they anticipated they and their 17 families would be among the many St. Anthony residents who would take 18 advantage of home style cooking. 19 20 All Commissioners Concur That Rapid Oil ' s Pylon Sign Has to Come Down - 21 At 8 : 35 P.M. , the Chair continued the November 17th hearing to 18'2 consider a Petition for Sign Variance from Mark Gilbertson, Project 3 Manager for Rapid Oil Change, to - allow the business at 3701 Silver 24 Lake Road to leave in place an existing, non-conforming, free-standing 25 sign on their property at the corner of 37th Avenue and Silver Lake 26 Road. 27 Staff Mr . Childs recalled the sign in question had been allowed 28 Report: Rapid Oil when they took over this property in 1984 and 29 while they were still selling gasoline as an auxiliary to 30 the quick lube service Rapid Oil Change normally offers 31 its customers at its other locations; 32 read aloud the portion of the ordinance which indicated 33 free-standing signs were only permitted to gas stations -34 which "shall be allowed in addition to all other authorized 35 signs, one pylon sign to identify the gasoline brand" ; 36 reported that at some point this summer Rapid Oil had 37 ceased to .sell gasoline, having removed the last two pump 38 islands . This had resulted in the City telling them to 39 remove the pylon sign and the company' s decision to apply 40 for a variance to retain the signage; 41 42 reiterated that because of the company' s concern that people 43 might think they had left that corner when the business is 44 shut. down -for remodeling,.. he .was.. recommending--removal not be 9 i 1 -required until-� a-fter the' reconstruction is completed which 2 ­.the company representatives- have said could . .take 9(,'l days; 3 however, thought it was important that a firm. date .for re- 4 moval be placed on that allowance. 5 Proponents : Mr. Gilbertson, who reiterated that an. important justi 6' fication for- retaining the sign had erroneously been 7 omitted from his "Statement of Hardships" which had 8 accompanied the petition; 9 said that involved the loss of gas sales profits Rapid 10 Oil had experienced when condemnation and reconstruc- 11 tion of 37th Avenue had made it economically unfeasible 12 for the company to make the investment necessary to re- . 13 place and continue with only two pumps after the two 14 islands had to be taken out to widen that intersection; 15 told Commissioner Hansen they would be reducing the 16 total signage on the building during remodeling which 17 would require them to completely close down the 18 business for around three weeks. 19 Steve Moldenhauer, Regional Manager for Rapid Oil 20 Change, also reiterated testimony he had given Nov 21 ember 17th related to the effect the loss of land had 22 on his company' s ability to continue in the gas busin- 23 ess , including the property congestion which followed, 24 the widening of 37th; 25 told Commissioner Hansen Rapid Oil sells gas in a 26 couple other locations in the Twin Cities ; 27 28 in answer to questions related to the tanks having to 29 be removed even if the roadway had not been widened, - 30 said the environmental conditions of the tanks were 31 still all right although there was always a possibil- 32 ity for leaks in tanks 15 or 20 years old. 33 Commissioners Perceive Insufficient Justification .for Allowing Pylon 34 to Remain 35 No one .else was present to provide further input to the discussion and 36 the Chair closed the hearing at 8 : 45 P.M. for the following Commis- 37 sioner comments : 38 Hansen: indicated he had always been concerned about the proximity 39 of the gas pumps to that intersection and he foresaw there 40 might -be problems with leaving that pylon sign on that 41 corner now that the whole intersection had been widened; ' • 10 noted that the pylon didn' t even match . the :color or letter— noted 'ang on the existing building. - 3 Wagner: questioned whether condemnation proceedings might not have 4 already- started when Rapid Oil took over the. property; I 5 was told by the Manager that with public hearings starting 6 way back in the 70 ' s on- the project, he was quite certain 7 references to the widening would have -had to be included 8 in the title investigation which preceded Rapid Oil ' s acqui- 9 sition of that property; 10 indicated he agreed with other Commissioners' observations 11 during the November 17th hearing, that even without the 12 pylon, Rapid Oil enjoyed better visibility than the 13 neighboring businesses ; 14 concluded by stating he perceived the pylon had to come down 15 because the business is not a gas station and the sign is 16 now in violation of the City Ordinance relating to free- 17 standing signs . 18 Commissioners Madden, werenicz, and London concurred that the pylon 19 sign should be removed in the following motion: ' �0 Commission Recommendation 21 Motion by Hansen, seconded by werenicz to recommend the Council deny 22 the request from Rapid Oil Change for a variance from the provisions 23 of the City Sign Ordinance which allows free-standing signs for only 24 gas stations but to allow them to retain the non-conforming free- 25 standing sign at 3701 Silver Lake Road until their remodeling is 26 completed sometime in the early spring with the stipulation that the 27 sign .must be removed upon completion of remodeling but no later than 28 June 1 , 1988 . In recommending denial , the Planning Commission finds 29 that since the business no longer sells gas , the pylon sign would be 30 in violation of the exceptions for gas stations stated in the Sign 31 Ordinance. 32 Motion carried unanimously. 33 Commission Concurs with Concept of Low Profile Development of American 34 Monarch Property 35 In their agenda packet , Commissioners had been provided with copies of 36 the October 21st request from American Monarch manager , Ed Fiore; site 37 drawings of the plant property at 2801-37th avenue N.E. ; and minutes 38 of the meetings early in 1979 where both the Planning Commission and 39 Council had extensively explored further development of the property 40 with. a large number of the neighbors . 11 i k I A's they had in '1979 , 'the major thrusts of the informal discussion with • 2 Mr. Fiore centered around American Monarch' s year-;:o-year , lease of 3 .land from the Soo Line Railroad for parking and 'the "gentlemen' s 4 agreement" reached that - year relative to the retention of about . 1-1/2 r 5 acres of unused property to the east for additional parking in the 6 event of plant growth in the future. 7 Mr. Fiore indicated,, as he had stated in his letter , that was. not 8 likely to happen now that his company' s owners in the East . had made a 9 corporate decision that no further expansion would be made in Min- 10 nesota because of what was perceived to be a "poor business climate" j 11 in the state. E 12 When Chair Franzese indicated a concern there might not -be enough 13 parking potential for the company who might replace American Monarch 14 if the corporate misgivings about Minnesota made them decide to move 15 the entire company, , Mr. Fiore assured her there was very little 16 likelihood that would ever happen because he said his company had too 17 much invested here to move the whole plant and, even when the number 18 of employees reached the 200 cap, in five years or so he would expect 19 only a portion of the plant to be moved. 20 Mr. Fiore also assured the Chair that, as a member of American 21 Monarch ' s Board of Directors , he would be vigorously lobbying against 22 any such move, having moved his whole family from the East and having 23 bought a home in Andover and a place up north. 24 The plant manager recalled the furor with which the neighbors had 25 greeted a suggestion in 1979 , the first year he was in St. Anthony, 26 that a Country Kitchen Restaurant be erected on the company property 27 -just west of the gas station on the corner which had prompted him to 28 tell the realtors and land speculators who were looking at the , 29 property'-that nothing more active than a low visibility professional 30 building with traffic compatible to a residential neighborhood would 31 be acceptable. 32 Mr'. Fiore indicated they had returned to tell him there was a market 33 of between $160 , 000 and $250 , 000 for that one and one and one-half 34 acres between the plant building and the Amoco station which would 35 leave the plant 128 parking places on plant property and an additional 36 100 spaces on land for which the company now pays $7 , 800 a year to 37 lease from the Soo Line. The ordinance requires 170 parking spaces 38 for this building. 39 Mr. Childs pointed out that there was also space available for parking 40 on the 150 X 70 foot grassy area on the west side which was not being 41 utilized,, where it might be possible to fit in 50 additional parking 42 spaces without encroaching the area currently used for a truck 43 driveway. . 44 Commissioner Wagner pointed out that large car sizes had probably 45 been used in determining the number of parking spaces on the property w 12 • 1 which could. probably be downsized today to match the prevalence of 2 compact cars . 3 Mr. Fiore restated for the benefit of Commissioner Werenicz that "we 4 have to live here and would- want to make sure something attractive 5 which the neighbor's would not oppose would go into that space. 6 Commission Reaction 7 Wagner and no opposition at all. 8 Hansen: 9 Franzese: would like to see a type of business in there which 10 would give St. Anthony a younger look; 11 might attract younger families to live in the City. 12 Werenicz : liked the concept of professional building. 13 Madden: would favor the development of unused property for 14 something "tasteful" . 15 London: would like to see the land used for an attractive 16 building rather than to sit empty. 47 The following was formulated as a "vote of confidence" for the 8 proposal: 19 Motion by Franzese , seconded by Hansen to indicate the Council the 20 Planning Commission' s unanimous approval of American. Monarch Cor- 21 poration' s concept for developing the unused property they own to the 22 west as proposed by the plant manager , Ed Fiore. 23 Motion carried unanimously. 24 Mr . Childs indicated he would not expect Mr. Fiore would have to be 25 present at the Council meeting where the above was presented since 26 only a concept review was involved and staff would be able to let him 27 know if any opposition to his proposal developed on the Council. He 28 would be surprised to see that happen, he said, since the property is 29 zoned industrial and "hopefully something will be developed there 30 which will please everybody. " 31 Brief Manager reports on the development of the final phases of the 32 Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment -Project; the traffic signal on Kenzie 33 Terrace; the community survey which would be taken from December 14th 34 through the 18th and the opening of Mannings Restaurant in the 35 Stonehouse preceded adjournment . 36 Commissioners were advised there was no, business to be considered at 37 the December 15th meeting, which would- be cancelled. 13 .J 1 ADJOURNMENT • t,. 2 'Motion- by -,Madden, seconded--by Wagner to adjourn the Planning Commis- 3 sion at 9 : 10 P.M. 4 Motion carried unanimously. 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 Helen Crowe, Secretary 7 :cjk 8 14 i ® .e DATE December 3, 1987 Mayor and Councilmembers FROM : David M. Childs, City Manager �O I'T EM : MICKEY D'S SIGN VARIANCE REQUEST -The- applicants are requesting three (3) -signs at the former- site of the Mr. -Hobo Restaurant. The ordinance allows one (1) sign not to exceed 100 square feet. The three signs requested are: (see sketches) *141 square foot sign on the south side of copy "Mickey D's Family Restaurant" (this sign is already installed) ; *64 square foot sign on roof on east side only of sign which formerly contained the "Mr. Hobo" letters; *32 square foot reader board type sign on the east side. The south sign was -- installed on a permit issued by Larry Hamer in which the sign company improperly calculated the square footage and Larry Hamer approved the improper calculations. (The sign company measured each individual word and came up with 82 square feet. Our ordinance very clearly does not allow such measurements and establishes the sign area as the square footage of a rectangle encompassing all of the copy. ) In the past, the Council and Commission have allowed a second sign in a corner location, but not to exceed the permitted square footage. The existing sign exceeds the permitted square footage by 41 square feet and therefore, the staff and Commission recommend that no variance be approved and that the existing sign be allowed to remain. :cjk12.8.87 Date: O ZCo Fee : $•25 .00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PETITION FOR SIGN VARIANCE 1 Applicant: �oQ1 Ca0� Phon Z Address : g Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc. ) : Legal description of property petitioned for variance : CpM N1 _tAl, Street Address : 2qc--) �� tJY�—T- f�. Zoning district in which property is located: Request: S - -� Minnesota Statutes and City ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. If the answer to a statement is Yes , please explain, using additional sheets . Yes No j 1. The granting of the variance will not be detri- mental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood or village; and 2 . A particular hardship to the applicant would re- sult if the strict letter of the regulations are adhered to, or j 3. The conditions upon which the application for a variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same land-use classification. Signature of p licant i.gnature o Owner If other than applicant) O O O' Aki�VERTISING 641 GRAND AVENUE.ST.PAUL.MN 55105 (61 2)224-41 1 7 .October 30, 1987 Attn; Larry Hammer St. Anthony Village 3301 silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418 RE: Mickey D' s Restaurant Additional Signage Dear Mr. Hammer We have prepared the following information for the approval of the signage as described below. This signage is included in a extensive and complete renovation of the restaurant, requiring a large investment by the owner. The new restaurant design offers a "FAMILY STYLE" setting. This is an important factor due to the unsuccessful operation of previous attempts under the "Mr. Hobo" name. The site is also a factor. The corner location is a prime commercial site which benefits the owner. This also increases the owner' s operating costs. The signage layout is arranged to attract business from two areas because of the corner lot layout. The size of the signage is determined by the distance to the traffic flow in the area. The large size is required to be effective to reach the main traffic ways of the area. This is necessary to substantiate the business. • The sign package includes: 1 . ) 4' x 8' 32' sq. card reader board for listing specials mounted on side of the building. 2.-) The renovation of the existing 2 sided "Mr. Hobo" pylon sign. This will have the sign face -changed to new neon lighting on one side (27 sq. feet) 3. ) The front- sign- established name and concept of family restaurant. I The signage package is of the highest quality available. This serves the commun- ity as well as the owner. This restaurant will now have family style character- ` istics to enhance the area as one of the pleasant locations as you enter the city area. I a Please find enclosed the exterior scale drawing elevations for your use.. We seek the city approval of this signage package due to the unique reasons described above. Sincerely Tom Gow J . CITY OF ST. ANTHONY NOTICE OF HEARING SIGN VARIANCE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing by the Planning Commission of the City of St. Anthony on Tuesday, November 17 , 1987 , at 7 : 35 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road (enter northeast corner) -for the following purpose: Request from Mickey D' s .Restaurant, 2905 Kenzie Terrace ( formerly Mr. Hobo's Restaurant) for a variance from the provisions of the sign ordinance to allow the following signage: • 1 . One 4 ' X 8 ' reader board on the side of the building ( 32 square feet) ; 2 . One wall sign 4 ' X 50 ' in size on the south wall; and 3 . One roof sign re-lettered on the east side only of the existing "Mr . Hobo" roof sign ( 27 square feet ) . Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at said time and place. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to the City Manager, 789-8881. David M. Childs City Manager Bulletin: November 4 , 1987 • i is MICKEY FAMILY RESTAURANT ` All 1 i I \`• 41 II { n 224.4117 E O S O R O - 841 Grand Avenue SIGNS r— cc,Mm,oNS St.Paul.MN 55105 •rYn OrEO et T�.l P ORf;JCC 7: (L 1 E N I ONa,riHL MV7N _ 1 Yi ¢c •'3l¢l 1�1:'i'Ve'C'2(6d'Y1791CRMitA}Oefa /_ , � � • ICX - f NOfIES ME Ca�arq�s ` 224-4117 LLB o o li o 841 Grand Avenue SIGNS d PROMOTIONS Si.Paul,MN 55105 _tl •noaovcD er }jR� u•u - 5 / onawh e• bur—U I Ov► E L-15� VA-MOIJ ri i[nr oe•w�..c..ure[u f_ uACJ®Y..Ra 1/nl c9,_,.E'YI�lillYiN v, 224-4117 o 841 Grand Avenue . 6 $t.Paul.MN 55105 -p A o.PR UA.r�MG wU�BI� / CLIENT; G1���KTW E:>I5 I 11 I a, November 13, 1987 Planning Commission Members ' -U P,OM David M. Childs City Manager — TM : SIGN VARIANCE REQUEST FROM RAPID OIL CHANGE As shown in the attached Notice of Hearing, the Zoning Ordinance allows free-standing signs for service stations. Rapid Oil Change formerly had gas pumps and thus were allowed the existing free-standing sign when they originally opened. (They also got approval for two wall signs due to their corner location. ) The gas tanks and pumps have been removed and the City then asked that the sign be removed to comply with the sign code. The people at Rapid•Oil Change are thus request- ing permission, through a variance, to be allowed to retain the sign. V I recommend denial of the request. They do not have gas pumps, they do have two wall signs and the visibility is not inadequate for the operation of their business. Auto Traac and Paul Revere Pizza have much less signage. 4 p - i 3 r :CJK11.17.87 i Date : ) 01 Fee : $25 .00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PETITION FOR SIGN VARIANCE Applicant: A�i� p�L � �� �� �Cl� one : Address : ?�� ( ✓� S ��LS T''') Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc. ) : Legal description of property petitioned for variance : Street Address : 7?,7 G�1L__V:�Z 4� t �7 Zoning district in which property is located: Request: Minnesota Statutes -and City ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. If the answer to a statement is Yes , • please explain, using additional sheets . Yes No 1. The granting of the variance will not be detri- mental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood or village; and 2 . A particular hardship to the applicant would re- sult if the strict letter of the regulations are adhered to, or 3. The conditions upon which the application for a variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable, generally , to other property within the same .land-use classification. Sig ure or Applicant • Signature of Owner (If other than applicant) M N r1 PETITION FOR SIGN VARIANCE RE: RAPID OIL CHANGE 3701 Silver Lake Rd. St. Anthony Village, MN STATEMENT OF PARTICULAR HARDSHIPS ITEM #2: Rapid Oil Change has operated a quick lute business at 3701 Silver Lake Road since November '84. From the time of opening until May '87 gasoline could also be purchased at this location. Due to the new laws governing the underground storage of hazardous chemicals and the poor condition of the underground tanks at the site; the decision was made to remove the tanks and discontinue the sale of all gasoline products. The pylon sign in question has been in place since the store opened. It measures 4'x6' and is approximately 18' high to top. The automotive care nature of our business has not changed appreciably since the termination of the gasoline sales and would cost approximately $500.00 to remove a sign which we spent about $2000.00'to install. Removing the sign will • also reduce our visibility and could result in lost sales for the company. ITEM #3: The conditions upon which the application for variance is based are unique to this piece of property in that due to revisions in the laws governing the underground storage of hazardous chemicals combined with the poor conditions of the existing tanks, necessitated that the tanks be removed. The costs associated with the removal of the existing tanks (now removed) combined with the- estimated costs for new replacement tanks and the increased liability associated with the sale of gasoline were prohibitive and lead to the decision to suspend all gasoline sales at this location. The quick lube portion of the business had been the more successful of the two operations and has remained. Respectfully, RAPID OIL CHANGE Mark J. Gilbertson, Project Manager MJG/cr . `.`Fake it to the Change Chang!" RAPID OIL CHANGE o CORPORATE OFFICE o 30--11 4th AVENUE SOUTH o MINNEAPOLIS.MN 55408 0 (612)827-2541 ' I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY NOTICE OF HEARING SIGN VARIANCE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing by the Planning Commission of the City of St. Anthony on Tuesday, November 17 , 1987 , at 7 : 50 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road (enter northeast corner) for the following purposes: • Request from Rapid Oil Change, 3701 Silver Lake Road, for a variance from the provisions of the Sign Ordinance to allow them to leave in place an existing, non-conforming free-standing sign at that location. Such a free-standing sign is permitted only at gasoline stations, and when gas pumps were removed from this location recently, the sign became non-conforming. Anyome wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at said time and place. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to the City Manager, 789-8881 . David M. Childs City Manager Bulletin: November 4 , 1987 • rkiLING L1J1 - JlUl J,,LVLh L^Kc nUNV W. F. Bauer Construction Hien Van Nguyen 4324 Lakepoint Court Edward E. Solz 3645 Silver Lake Road Shoreview, MN 55112 3636 Penrod • j St. Anthony, MN 55418 St. Anthony, MN 55418 Re: 3640-44 Silver Lake Road Bruce C. Anderson Auto Traac Don Messick 3640 Penrod 3009-37th Avenue N.E. 3101 Edgemere St. Anthony, MN 55418 St. Anthony, MN 55421 St. Anthony, MN 55418 Richard LVoir Tom Packard Northern States Power 10 N.E. 661 Way 5417 Woodcrest Drive,. 1518 Chestnut North Fridley, MN 55431 Edina, MN 55424 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Re: 2908-37th Ave. N.E. Re: 3005-37th Ave. N.E. Re: 3716 Macalaster Drive N.E. • American' Monarck�,Corpora Rion 2801 37TH AVE. N. E. - MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55421 •,612.788-9161 October 21, 1987 David M. Childs/City Manager ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418 RE; East parcel of American Monarch 'Corporation property Dear Dave; - In April the Board of Directors of American Monarch Corporation made a decision to basically limit total employment at our present facility to 200 employees. In line with that decision, I have been directed to pursue the sale of the approximate 12 acre between our building and the AMOCO station. We have done some preliminary work and it appears that there is a market for the piece of property at a price that is attractive to American Monarch Corporation. In talking to several Real Estate agents, we have told them that in our opinion, the City of St. Anthony would not approve a fast food restaurant or similar type business establishment that can be considered a nuisance to the residents across the street. The realtors feel that the site is ideal for a professional type building such as a Medical/Dental Clinic or similar type office building. As you know our present structure is approximately 60,000 Sq.Ft. of manufacturing which would require approximately 170 parking spaces. The present parking facility is 128 on American Monarch property and 100 additional spaces are on property that we lease from the Soo Line on a year-to-year basis. American Monarch has additional property to the West of our building that could be used for 20 more spaces, Giving us a total of 148 against an ordinance requirement of 170. At the present time, American Monarch has 113 employees of which 75 are Production. Of those 75, 7 are on the Second shift which means we have a First shift of 106 people. j David M.Childs East Parcel October 21 , 1987 Page 2 , • I I To double our present production we would probably add 10 people j to the First shift, 60 people to the Second shift and add additional office staff of 10 to the First shift which would give us a total .of 125 people on the First shift and 70-75 on the Second shift. This means we could provide one (1) parking space per employee per shift under the existing American Monarch owned parking facilities. We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss our plans with the Planning Board and Government Bodies which should be involved before- we pursue the sale of the property. Needless to say, I will be available at the convenience of the Boards to review our plans with the hope of obtaining the necessary variances so that the property in question may be used to create additional employment and add economically to the City of St.Anthony. Very truly yours , • Edward J.Fiore Vice President/General Manager cc: Miguel G.Mendoza Chairman of the Board American Monarch Corporation Jess S.Barber President American Monarch Corporation EJF/tg In reference to State Statute 624 . 24 which the City Attorney had researched for the City in 1976 , he said there is apparently no awareness on the part of City officials or disco operators in the other municipalities of such restrictions on this type of activity as are detailed in this statute. Though the existence of such a statute might actually aid the City in the control of such an activity, the Manager questioned whether the City Council would be placed in a tenous position of condoning non-enforcement of the statute if the City ordinances were altered to permit the operation of the dance hall. Motion by Mr. Bjorklund and seconded by Mr . Marks to indicate to the Council the Board' s general approval of the concept of the proposed teen dance center if Mr. Baer is able to get an indication from state officials that such a center is permissible under Statute 624 . 24 and as long as City approval is subject to the retention of at least one uniformed policeman inside the building; the area around the center is supervised and cleaned up and the City is adequately protected from liability . Motion carried unanimously. Ken Johnson, 1927 Simpson, Roseville , who operates the Burger Chef restau- rant, 4004 Silver Lake Road, presented his request that he be allowed to substitute .for the existing 75 square foot sign on top of his building the franchise ' s new logo which is only 43 square feet. He also asked that the 10 foot sign he now has along the driveway be relocated on top of the building where it could direct customers to the drive-up window which will be added when the building is remodeled. There will be no "flashing lights" in the signage but rather the new lexan sign for which he showed site plans will be internally lit. Mr. Johnson told the Board he had been issued a permit in 1969 for a 100 square foot sign which the City requested be put above the building and the signage was reduced last year to 75 square feet. Motion by Mr . Bowerman and seconded by Mr. Jones to recommend that the Council allow Ken Johnson to make the requested change in signage for Burger Chef, 400.4 Silver Lake Road, as per the plans he submitted as long as the total area of signage is not exceeded, finding that it would appear to be unreasonable to deny the variance to the Sign Ordinance for the change since the proposed sign brings the signage for Burger Chef into closer conformance with the City ' s current sign philosophy and a hardship to Mr. Johnson might result from forcing him to retain the old signage. ­-Motion carried unanimously. Edward J. Fiore of American Monarch Corporation, 2801 37th Avenue N.E. , appeared to discuss with the Board the projected need for 25% more floor area within his existing plant for which he presented conceptual drawings for the proposed expansion of the building. These included plantings which he said had been suggested by the City Manager to provide relief from the elongated line of the building which he admitted will "resemble an airplane hangar" .. The plant manager told of efforts of his company to secure more land for parking in the rear from the Soo Line and detailed the steps he is prepared ( 3) to. take to prevent his employees from parking on- adjoining residential streets especially during the construction period . He estimated the ex pansion plans will create a need for from 200 to -240., parking spaces and the drawings indicated parkin., facilities on the east side of the building .which can be developed if negotiations -with the Soo Line are unsuccessful . '.--'Mr. Klink said he had lived across 37th. Aveneu from American Monarch for four years and had been surprised at the few complaints the neighbors had voiced regarding on-street parking by employees of the firm. Mr. Fornell . agreed that there had been an improvement in the past few years . Placement of the time clock will determine the parking habits of most of the employees, Mr. Fiore said, and he promised to communicate to the neighbors his company' s request that they direct .any complaints regarding parking of employees to the company rather than bother the City police . The general consensus of the Board appeared to be favorable to the concept as presented. Mr. Rymarchick reported receiving several inquiries regarding the adver- tised sale of the lots on 33rd Avenue N.E . and Silver Lake Road which are owned by the School District especially as to what type of development would be accepted there . Tom McMullen, I .S .D. #282 ' s Coirmunity Service Director, gave a status report on tie sale of ! . S .D. 282 lots at 33rd Avenue N.E . and Silver Lake Road. He did not anticipate an immediate sale , however, because inabil ` J to locate some pertinent documents was delaying the clearance of. title and suggested the Board might invite Mike Sullivan , Finance Director of District =282 , to tell them how the bids for the property are being handled and whether such bids may be accepted on contingencies that the zoning of the property from R-1 , single family dwelling might be modified by the City to allow multiple or two family dwellings . Board members noted they had not been notified of their reappointment to the Board for the coming year but, assuming this to be just an oversight, took the following actions to reorganize for 1979 : Motion by Mr. Bowerman and seconded by Mr. Rymarchick to hold an election of officers to serve on the Board for 1979 and to nominate George Marks as Chairman and Dick Klink as Chairman Pro Tem. i Motion carried unanimously . I Both indicated a willingness to serve in these capacities . Motion by Mr. Bjorklund and seconded by Mr . Bowerman to close nominations � and declare the nominees to be elected . Motion carried unanimously . Mr . Klick then complimented Mr . Rymarchick and Mr. Marks for their leader- ship of the Board the past year when he felt meetings had been handled i tremely well under very trying circumstances in some instances . Other f (4 ) II CITY OF ST ANTHONY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES February 20 , 1979 1 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Marks at 7 : 30 p.m. Present for roll call: Klick, Marks ; Bowerman, Sopcinski , Rymarchick, Bjorklund and Jones arrived at 7 : 37 p.m. Also present: Jim Fornell, City Manager Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant The minutes for the Board meeting held January 16th were corrected to de- lete the sentence in Paragraph 3 of Page 3 referring to the 10 foot directional sign along the Burger Chef driveway. Motion by Mr. Bowerman and seconded by Mr. Sopcinski to approve the minutes for the January 16 , 1979 Board meeting as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Klick will represent the Board at the Council meeting to be held February 27th. At 7: 35 p.m. Chairman Marks opened the Public Hearing on variances necessary for the proposed expansion of the American Monarch plant at 2801 37th Avenue N.E. The Manager confirmed that all filing and notification requirements for such a hearing had been met and no one present who should have received such notice reported failure to receive same. However, one resident, Stanley Worwa, 3628 Belden Drive said he objected to the contents of the notice since it failed to address the question of where the plant' s employees will park during the construction period. Mr. Fornell told him that question did not involve a variance per se for which a Public Hearing is required by the City Zoning Ordinance but' would certainly be a vital aspect of the Board's consideration of the proposal . He also told Mr. Worwa that one of the supporting documents furnished by American Monarch for their Petition for Variance had been the "Parking During Construction" which specifically noted the streets in the area the firm anticipates utilizing for off site parking under strict company super- vision from' April through July while the new parking lots are being con- structed. The Chairman then read that document and the amended notice of the hearing which informed the residents within the required distance from the plant of the variances which would be required under the Zoning Ordinance for the proposed expansion of the plant including the rear yard variance which a new survey had indicated would be needed. J Edward J. Fiore, American Monarch Manager, then reiterated the justifica- tions which had been detailed with his Petition for a Variance for the granting of the variances which will permit construction of a 265 x 80 foot addition on the west side -of the existing building for which he -had fur- nished site plans f.or. both parking and landscaping as requested by Mr. �✓ Fornell . He also discussed the lease with the Soo Line Railroad (a ,copy of which was included) which will provide his firm with an additional 56 feet to the rear in which parking can be provided for the bulk of the employees vehicles and told the Board of his firm' s plans to erect a . four foot chain link fence required by the ' railroad which he saw as a prevention of vehicles from Apache crossing- American Monarch property -as is now done and a resultant lowering of the incidents of vandalism now experienced. His presentation included plans for snow storage in that area as. well as storm water drainage which were specific concerns of the Board, as well as details of the addition to the building in two segments of 10 , 000 square feet on each side of the. building. He concluded by telling the Board that not allowing the proposed parking plans could result in the "end of American Monarch in St . Anthony" because, of the 35% increase in production projected by their customers . He replied to Mr. Fornell ' s query about whether the company would proceed with the first segment of. the expansion proposal if the variances necessary to the second were not allowed by say- ing he thought that decision would have to be closely considered in view of the $700 ,000 investment at stake. Before the Public Hearing was closed at 8 : 32 p.m. , there was a lengthy dis- cussion of the manner in which Mr. Fiore intends to keep his employees from becoming a nuisance to the area ' s residents during the construction period and Mr. Worwa said he was satisfied with the company ' s plans for company enforcement of the regulations they had set for such parking and Mr. Fiore ' s later agreement that it might be best to have supervisory anco administrative employees use the off site parking areas where they could provide supervision of other employees . During the period preceding a decision on the proposal Mr. Fiore told the Board he anticipated no problems with parking for his employees even with the second phase of expansion since so many of them are from the immediate area and either walk to work or double up on transportation to the plant. Mr . Bjorklund was concerned *that easements on the property had not been identified in the new survey. Mr. Jones questioned whether the number of employees projected for the expansion might exceed that number thereby requiring additional parking spaces , and Mr . Rymarchick expressed his concern that the lease with the Soo Line could be terminated. and parking space to the rear diminished. Mr. Bjorklund wanted it understood the property to the east of the existing building. could not be used for expansion if the lease termination should make parking inadequate if the addition were built. Mr. Fiore responded by saying the "onus" is on the corporation to provide adequate parking for its employees who will apply internal pressures to see they are provided parking spaces . ; Mr . Fornell thought the City could possibly handle the matter of inadequate I parking if the employee growth outstripped the projections through enforoo ment of parking on off site locations . (2) i Following these assurances , . Mr. Rymarchick said he would move for a recom- mendation of approval -of the proposal under the assumption that the City will get full cooperation from American Monarch regarding off site parking during the construction period as indicated in their proposal . Motion by Mr . Rymarchick and seconded by Mr. Klick to recommend Council approval of a seven foot front yard parking setback variance to provide two additional parking spaces and a 17 foot front yard building setback vari- ance to allow the proposed expansion to be compatible with the symmetry of the existing building, a 15 foot rear yard setback variance as well as a parking setback variance of 10 feet along the entire rear lot line, and finally, a one foot variance to the parking space size requirements which will allow nine instead of 10 toot wide parking spaces as well as the variance necessary for 30 more parking spaces than permitted by the Zoning Ordinance for the proposed 80 ' x 265 expansion of the American Monarch plant to the west, finding that : (a) granting these variances- will relieve the undue hardship caused by the pie shape of this parcel and its parti- cular physical surroundings and topography (b) the purpose for these variances is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel but is unique to the existing .tenant and (c) great difficulties and hardships for the tenant might result if vari- ances are not granted. The granting of the variances is however subject to the following conditions: 1 . Further expansion than is presently proposed will not be permitted without assurance of a long term lease with the = � Soo Line which provides adequate off street parking. 2 . American Monarch cannot dispose of the easterly portion of their property which must be kept to provide adequate .parking should the Soo Line lease be terminated. 3. Landscaping shall be provided as per the plans presented from Freeburg Nurseries and will be subject to review by the City Manager. 4 . Investigation by Staff of easements as referenced in the legal description of this property. Voting on the motion: Aye: Jones , Klick, Marks , Bowerman, Sopcinski and Rymarchick Abstention: Bjorklund Motion carried. Mr. Fornell gave a status report on the Comprehensive Plan for the City ` telling of the extensive commitment of time to the study. He anticipates the Plan will be ready for Board review sometime in April . The Johnson Florist litigation should go to court within the next few months, the Manager told Mr. Klick . He also reported a meeting with . the Johnson' s attorney this week . At the request of Mr. Jones the details of the possibility of relocating the Apache Liquor Store and/or Bar were s (3) being -constructed. ' Mr . Fiore assured Mr. Duerre that he could expect a ' ._• response within hours of any complaint about employees parking, since re- j sidents will be requested- 'to direct any reports of annoyance to him per- sonally . He said he has been especially vigilant 'regarding his employees ' parking and doubted the two parked cars Mr. Duerre complained about be- r longed to his employees . The plant manager said his firm now has . adequate t parking spaces for its employees and -there will be 250 parking spaces j provided to accomodate the increase in. personnel with the expansion. • i However, since a major number of the new parking locations will be on the 1 land to the rear of the building American Monarch has leased from Soo Line, ', the City Attorney cautioned the Council that the leased strip "cannot be counted as part of the site and there has to be land available for adequate parking at all times even if additional land is leased for that purpose" . Motion by Councilman Sundland and seconded by Councilman Sauer to grant (as recommended by the Planning Board) a seven -foot front yard parking setback variance to provide two additional parking spaces and a 17 foot front yard building setback variance to allow the proposed expansion to be compatible with the symmetry of the existing building, a 15 foot rear yard setback variance as well as a parking setback variance of 10 feet a- long the entire rear lot line , and finally, a one foot variance to the parking space size requirements. which will allow nine instead of 10 foot wide parking spaces as well as the variance necessary for 30 more parking spaces than permitted by the Zoning Ordinance for the proposed 80 ' x 265' expansion of the American Monarch plant to the west, finding that: (a) granting these variances will relieve the undue hardship caused by the pie shape of this parcel and its particular physical surroundings and topo- graphy (b) the purpose for these variances is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel but is unique to the existing tenant and (c) great difficulties and hardships for the tenant might result if variances are not granted. The granting of the variances is however subject to the following conditions : 1 . Further expansion than is presently proposed will not be permitted without the insurance that adequate off street parking is provided on property that is owned by American Monarch. 2 . Landscaping shall be provided as per the plans presented from Freeburg Nurseries and shall be subject to review by the City Manager. 3. The sanctity of the storm sewer easement to the east of the ex- isting building is to be preserved. Motion carried unanimously . Mr. Klick concluded his presentation by reporting the balance of the Board' s meeting was devoted to consideration of proposed changes in the City ' s Sign Ordinance which had been provided by Mr. Berg, for which he commended the Administrative Assistant, and the continuing education of thi Board in the planning processes . The meeting was recessed from 7 : 55 p.m. to 8 :00 p.m. when the Mayor opened the Public Hearing on Street Improvement Project 1979-001 , the rebuilding of Highcrest Road from 37th Avenue N.E ., to the intersection of Old Highway (2) CITY OF ST. ANTH'JNY COUNCIL MINUTES February 27, 19`79 The meeting was called to order at 7 : 35 p.m. by Mayor Haik, I i Present for roll call-: Sauer, Sundland, Haik, Ranallo -and Letourneau. Also present: Jim Fornell, City Manager Bill Soth, City Attorney Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant Carol' Johnson, Clerk/Treasurer Larry Hamer, Public works Director The minutes for the Council ' s February 13th meeting were corrected as follows : Page 7, Paragraph 2 : Reference to the President' s guidelines should have been for "70" rather than "6%" Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to ap- prove the minutes for the February 13, 1979 Council meeting as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. Dick Klick appeared to discuss actions taken and recommendations to the Council made by the Planning Board during their February 20 , 1979 meeting as reflected in the minutes of that meeting. He reported the major action taken was regarding the- expansion plans for American Monarch, 2801 37th Avenue N.E. A recommendation of Council ap- proval of all variances necessary to the proposed 80 ' x 265 ' plant expan- sion to the west was -made subject to conditions set by the Board- to assure adequate parking and landscaping. The Board representative said because the new survey of the property had not indicated utility easement locations, one of the conditions was the investigation by staff of the reference in the legal description to such an easement. Mr. Fornell reported there is a 45 foot wide easement for a 33 inch storm sewer line which abuts the building on the east and which might prove a hindrance to the firm' s future expansion plans in that direction as detail- ed in the application for the variances from American Monarch . Duane Duerre, 2606 37th Avenue N.E. , was the only resident present to speak for or against the proposal . He said he had been unable to attend the public hearing on the expansion but his daughter had been in attendance and reported she understood that the parking on 37th Avenue would increase and the street would be posted for only American Monarch employees . Edward J. Fiore, American Monarch Manager , explained to him that the firV was only proposing employee parking on specified side streets under strict management supervision for only the period when the new parking lots are E� t LAW OFFICES a HANCE . F3 LE VAH N , LTD. • SAINT ANTHONY NATIONAL BANK BUILDING, SUITE 200 2401 LOWRY AVENUE NORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418 EDWARD J. HANCE JOEL T, LEVAHN - PAUL W. FANNING TELEPHONE ALLEN R. DESMOND (612) 781-4858 ASSISTANTS , TERESA H. CRAVEN KATHRYN A.DAILEY November 20 , 1987 Mr . David Childs City Manager City of St. An 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418 Captain Richard Engstrom St. Anthony Police Department • 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418 Chief Donald Hickerson St. Anthony Police Department 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418 Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith please find a copy of a report indicating various matters conducted at the Hennepin County District Court on November 18 , 1987 . Should you h, ve any questions or comments, please contact me. Yours v ly, 1 EDWA HANCE l/ r Enclo ure • EJH/kd ST. ANTHONY PROSECUTION ACTIVITY November 18, 1987 EDWARD J. HANCE LAW OFFICES, LTD. • Submitted by: Edward J. Hance Prosecuting Attorney 2401 Lowry Avenue N.E., Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 Telephone: (612) 781-6539 A R R A I G N M E N T S - The Honorable Robert A. Forsythe DEFENDANT PLEA SENTENCE Amon, Cindy Sue Charged with DAR and expired 113 registration; Pre-Trial set for January 6, 1988. Anderson, David Glen Charged with speeding and Fine - $60.00. 108 failure to stop for stop sign; Pled guilty to speeding; Other charge dismissed. Betand, Christopher John Charged with trespassing in Charge continued for dismissal for 115 a cemetery after hours; six months on condition of no offenses Charge continued six months for trespassing in a cemetery for for dismissal. six months. Brazil, Scott Gary Charged with no insurance and Fine - $200.00; Jail - 5 days, 5 113 defective equipment; Pled guilty days stayed one year; On conditions to no insurance; Other charge of no insurance violations for one dismissed. year and payment of $200.00 fine. Cloutier, Michael Allan Charged with no insurance and Fine - $200.00; Jail - 5 days, 5 115 expired registration; Pled guilty days stayed one year; On conditions to no insurance charge; Other of no insurance violations for one charge dismissed. year and payment of $200.00 fine. Forsythe, David Emmet Charged with DWI, alcohol con- 113, 115 centration of .10 or more within two hours (.12), and passing through red semaphore; Arraignment continued until January 6, 1988. Hiel, Mark Orville Charged with theft by trick or Fine - $150.00. Citizen's Complain device; Pled guilty. Hooper, Lisa Marie Charged with trespassing in Charge continued for dismissal for 115 cemetery after hours; Charge six months on condition of no charges continued six months for of trespassing in a cemetery for dismissal. six months. Jaroscak, Michael John Charged with no insurance and Fine - $40.00; No insurance charge 115 speeding; Pled guilty to continued one year for dismissal on speeding; No insurance charge conditions of no insurance viola- continued one year for dismissal. tions for one year and payment of $100.00 in costs to the City of St. Anthony. Johnson, Marie Susan Charged with no insurance, revoked 113 plates, expired registration, and speeding; Arraignment continued until December 2, 1987. LaMotte, Jr., Leslie Charged with no insurance and Fine - $40.00; No insurance charge Leonard speeding; Pled guilty to continued one year for dismissal on 108 speeding; No insurance charge condition of no insurance violations continued for dismissal for for one year. • one year. Larson, Mark Thomas Charged with possession of 113 alcohol by person under legal age; Arraignment continued until December 2, 1987. T Lemire, Robert Francis Charged with DAR, no insurance, Fine - $200.00; Jail - 30 days, 28 115 and expired plates; Pled guilty days stayed for one year; On con- to no insurance charge; Other ditions of no violations for • charges dismissed. operating motor vehicle without required insurance, no driver's license violations, and no expired registration violations for one year, and service of two days in the workhouse. Lutz, James Patrick Charged with DAR, no insurance, Fine - None levied as Defendant is 115 and trespassing in cemetery indigent; Jail - 10 days, 10 days after hours; Pled guilty to stayed one year; On conditions of no no insurance charge; Other same or similar offenses and no dri- charges dismissed. ver's license violations for one year. Monson, Stephen Robert Charged with gross DWI, gross Engstrom, 116 alcohol concentration of .10 or more within two hours- _ (.12), and aggravated DWI; Pre-Trial/probable cause hearing set for December 16, 1987. Odegard, Neil Allen , charged with DAR and giving 115 false information to a police officer; Pre-Trial set ,for December 2, 1987. Patraw, Allen Robert Charged with failure to display 114 current license plates and no insurance; Arraignment continued until December 2, 1987. i 1 1 I Rathbun, Richard Keith Charged with fifth degree assault; Charge continued one year for :. Citizen's Complaint Charge continued one year for dismissal on conditions of no same, dismissal. or similar offenses,_no assault 'r charges, no breaking'"and entering, offenses, no disorderly conduct offenses for one year, and payment of $25.00 in court costs. :'+• Renstrom, Richard Brian Charged with DWI and alcohol ' 108' concentration of .10 or. more within two hours (.13); Pre-Trial set for December 16, 1987. Skovran, Connie Marie" Charged with DAS and speeding; Fine - $40.00; DAS charge continued 116 Pled guilty to speeding; DAS one year for dismissal on condition charge continued one year for of no driver's license violations dismissal. for one year. Skule, Darren James Charged with passenger possession j 114, 115 of open bottle; No appearance at November 18, 1987, arraignment; Bench warrant issued. Srnec, Andrea Beth' Charged with DWI and alcohol Thoemke, 116 concentration of .10 or more within two hours (.11); Pre-Trial set for December 16, 1987. Vang, Ker Charged with DAS and passing Fine - $150.00; Jail - 30 days, 30 116 through stop sign; Pled guilty days stayed one year; On conditions • to DAS; Other charge dismissed. of no insurance or,driver's license violations for one year and payment of $150.00 fine. ' ' I 1 ,4 P R E - T R I A L S - The Honorable Robert A. Forsythe •DEFENDANT PLEA SENTENCE Armato, Leonard Charged with gross DWI and gross Thoemke, 113, 114 alcohol concentration of .10 or more within two hours (.14); Jury Trial set for January 12, 1988, at 9:45 a.m. Fox, Charles Vincent Craig Charged with leaving scene of an 108 accident, no insurance, and driving without a valid Minnesota driver's license; Pre-Trial continued until December 2, 1987. Fuhrmannek, Gretchen Renae Charged with gross DWI, gross 108 alcohol concentration of .10 or more within two hours (.11), and possession of small amount of marijuana in a motor vehicle; Pre-Trial continued until December 16, 1987. House, Gary Allen Charged with no insurance and Fine - $50.00 or 5 days; Jail - 5 114 expired registration; Pled days, 5 days stayed for one year; On guilty to no insurance charge; conditions of no insurance viola- Other charge dismissed. tions for one year and payment of $50.00 fine or service of 5 days in the workhouse. Peterson, Susan Lynn Charged with speeding; Charge Fine - $100.00; Jail - 5 days, 5 116 amended to unreasonable days stayed; On conditions of no acceleration; Pled guilty speeding violations for six months to unreasonable acceleration. and payment of $100.00 fine. sharp, Jr., William Lee Charged with DWI, alcohol 113, 115 concentration of .10 or more within two hours (.11), and open bottle; Pre-Trial continued until December 2, 1987. Sherman, Christian Arthur Charged with gross DWI (two 108 DWI offenses within five years), gross DWI (three DWI offenses within ten years), aggravated DWI, and giving false information to a police officer; No appearance at November 18, 1987, pre-trial; Bench warrant issued. Smith, Jr., Richard Neil Charged with no insurance and Fine - $50.00; Jail - 5 days, 5 days 115 failure to transfer title; Pled stayed one year; On conditions of no guilty to no insurance charge; insurance violations for one year Other charge dismissed. and payment of $50.00 fine. Tate, Lynee Theresa Charged with DWI, alcohol Fine - $700.00, $700.00 stayed one Thoemke concentration of .10 or more year; Jail - 30 days, 28 days stayed within two hours (.14), DAS, one year; On conditions of no same and speeding; Pled guilty to or similar offenses for one year and alcohol concentration of .10 or attendance at Driver Improvement more within two hours charge; Clinic. Other charges dismissed. Whitson, Todd Michael Charged with DAR; DAR charge 108 dismissed as Defendant was told by the judge at his initial arraignment • that if he produced proof showing that his revocation stemmed from Defendant's insurance agent's delay in notifying the State that Defendant was covered, then the charge would be dismissed; Defendant produced the documentation proving this claim. J U R Y T R I A L S I DEFENDANT PLEA SENTENCE Dorsett, Anthony Preston Charged with DWI, alcohol Fine - $100.00; Jail - 30 days, 28 113 concentration of .10 or more days stayed one year; On conditions• within two hours (.14), and of no same or similar offenses for driver allowing open bottle; one year and payment of $75.00 Alcohol concentration of .10 alcohol-assessment fee. or more within two hours charge amended to careless driving; due to Defendant's low blood- alcohol reading and good prior record; Pled guilty to careless driving;. Other charges dismissed; Plea entered on October 22, 1987, before The Honorable Daniel R. Hart. Hail, Karen Aileen Charged with DAS and passing Fine - $70.00; DAS charge continued 114 through a stop sign; Pled one year for dismissal on conditions guilty to passing through a of no driver's license violations for stop sign charge as a one year and payment of $100.00 in misdemeanor; DAS charge court costs. continued for dismissal for 't one year. M I S C E L L A N E O U S DEFENDANT PLEA, SENTENCE Kruse, Ricky Edward Charged with speeding, no Fine - $300.00 or 3 days; Jail - 90 108 insurance, and defective days, 90 days stayed one year; On tail lights; Pled guilty to conditions of no same or similar no insurance charge; Other offenses for one year. charges dismissed; Plea entered on November 2, 1987, before The Honorable Thomas H. Carey. j i Oliver, Michael Patrick Charged with DWI and alcohol Fine - $300.00, $200.00 stayed one 108, 113 concentration of .10 or more year; Jail - 30 days, 30 days stayed within two hours (.20); Pled one year; On conditions of payment i guilty to alcohol concentration of $100.00 fine or completion of 20 of .10 or more within two hours hours of community service, charge; Other charge dismissed; Defendant following recommendations •;; ,' Plea entered on November 12, of probation officer, and no 1987, before The Honorable alcohol-related offenses, fleeing . Isabel Gomez. police officer charges, or hit and run offenses for one year. 1 V C C O M P L A I N T S i�•, DEFENDANT OFFICER + CHARGE . Berg, Curtis Lee Officer John Ohl Charged with operating motor vehicle without required insurance and operating motor vehicle with defec- tive headlights. Brainard, Gregory Mark Captain Richard Engstrom Charged with gross DWI•, gross alco- Officer John MacQueen hol concentration of .10 or more as measured within two hours of driving (.14), and operating motor vehicle without required insurance. Erickson, Robert Aithur Officer David Johnston Charged with allowing animals to run at large. j Lee, Richard Allen Captain Richard Engstrom Charged with g gross DWI, revoked Officer Jeffrey Scholl license plates, and possession of marijuana in a motor vehicle. Skinaway, Roger Allen Officer John MacQueen Charged with revoked license plates• and expired registration. I l`r' L SALES SUMARY , NOVEMBER 1987 Store One Storg 7%.Yo Store Thr.,c Combined On Sale Off Sale On Sale Off Sale Warehouse Sales - Nov. 187 305,945.32 44,296..11 16,038.56 131•,8-59.54 113,751.11 Sales - Nov. '-86 317,109.30 29,267.64 19,405.19 134,898.45 133,538.02 Increase $ 11,163.98* 15,028.47 3,366.63* 3,038.91* 19,786.91* Increase ? 3.53%* 51.35% 17.36%* 2.260* 14.820* Sales - 11 Mos. '87 3,397,202.40 352,034..21 193,388.34 1,480,870.17 1,370,909.68 Sales - 11 Mos. '86 3,234,858.53 360,975.93 222,357.68 973,087.32 1,678,437.60 111erea :e $ 162,343.87 8,941.72* 28,969.34* . 507,782.85 307,527.92* Increase 5.02% 2.48%* 13.03%* 52.19% 18.330* * Decrease October 1987 MONTHLY REPORT - POLICE DEPARTMENT ' S POLICE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC Total number of radio calls ---------- -- 481 Public Assists ---- -------------- -- — 605 Y - jOther Details ------------- f NUMBER OF CASES REPORTED FOR THE MONTH HOMICIDE 0 FIRE CALLS 7 'j SEXUAL ASSAULTS 0 SUICIDES (Attempt) 3 OTHER SEX OFFENSES. 0 DOMESTICS ti ROBBERY 1 — TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS ASSAULTS 1 FATALS 0 BURGLARY-RESIDENTIAL 3 PERSONAL INJURY 3 BURGLARY-BUSINESS 13 PROPERTY DAMAGE 6 LARCENIES 24 HIT & RUN 1 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFTS 1 UNSECURED BUSH/RES. 4 1 DELIVER AGENDAS, TAGS 54 ARSON 0 WATER SEWER PROBLEMS 2 FORGERY ---r- 0 STREET SIGNS & LIGHTS FRAUD ROAD CONDITIONS, ETC. VANDALISM 10 ASSIST OTHER POLICE & 9 WEAPON OFFENSES ' 0 SHERIFF DEPARTMENTS NARCOTICS' 1 VIOL. BURNING ORDINANCE 0 OTHER CRIMES 4 REPORT TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1 DISTURBANCE CALLS 32 92 _ GIVING/RECEIVING INFORMATION SUSPICIOUS PERSONS/VEHICLES 22 ASSIST OTHER 6900 SQUADS 53 RUNAWAY JUVENILES 0 INVESTIGATION FOLLOW-UPS 3 r ALARM CALLS 19 LIQUOR BANK RUNS 47 WARRANT ARRESTS 15 MEDICAL EMERGENCIES 28, IMPOUNDED VEHICLES 33 ANIMAL BITES 1 LIQUOR OFFENSES 2 OTHER ANIMAL VIOLATIONS 6 D.W.I. ARRESTS 3 OTHER INCIDENT REPORTS 20 BREATHALYZER TESTS RUN 7 • (Other Crimes: Incorrigible Youth, UUMV & (Other Incidents: Tow Truck Inspections, Harassing Communications) Photos, Truancy, detail to radio, transport, verify equipment tags & DK's) MONTHLY PATROL STATISTICS October 1987 MISD. MOVING NON-MOVING GROSS MISD.` TRAFFIC FELONY WARRANT i OFFICERS VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS D'W. I . D.W. I . ARRESTS ARRESTS ARRESTS ARRESTS CRIMINAL r Ferguson 13/7 2 1 2 2 Sturdevant 4/2 2 Macqueen 38/7 1 2 12 3 2 i Johnston 46/30 3 5 2 2 Scholl 67/38 1 9 3 1 Ohl 16/5 2 2 Carlson 56/28 1 8 -- 3 Cotroneo 38/14 1 2 7 2 OTHERS 2/2 TOTAL 280/133 8 4 3 44 7 3 14 ea-- MEMORANDUM DATE: December 3 , 1987 TO: David Childs,. City Manager Department Heads FROM: Connie Kroeplin ITEM: STAFF MEETING NOTES - DECEMBER 2 , 1987 The staff meeting -began at 2 : 10- P.M. . Present were David Childs, Carol Johnson, Lee Entner, Larry Hamer, Don Hickerson, and Connie -- -Kroeplin. Ray= Nelson was absent. - - - Dave Childs 1 . Plans for the upcoming City employee Christmas party are progressing well. The invitations have been sent, food, music , and bartender have been taken. car.e of and the door prizes are being checked on. 2 . The draft copy of the community survey questions has been . distributed, feedback received and the final draft will be ready Friday to. be reviewed at the Council' s -December 8th meeting. Mr. Childs indicated the final can still be changed at that time. 3 . Mr. Childs continues to meet .with school officials ,regarding Parkview and gave a summary of the proposals to date. The school has offered Parkview to the City- but would like to stay there for a -period of time ( rent free) - and retain the gymnasium and adjacent rooms until March, 1989 . Before the City makes a final decision on Parkview, . a consulting firm will assess and analyze the. .City' s options. 4 . Mr. Childs also met with the Army to discuss the City' s water contamination problems. They are checking the City' s costs , while not. admitting any liability. at this time, they have agreed if they are liable,. they will pay the City' s costs incurred by- the contamination. New Brighton received $9 million in their settlement. The Army will build and operate a carbon filtration plant, but wants New Brighton to open its shallow wells, :rather than use its non-contaminated. deep wells . Don Hickerson 1 . - Has several items,: for the December 8th Council agenda: ,J a. • Purchase of a--new Caprice .squad car. through the Henne- . pin County contract; b. Memorandum of Understanding regarding the school ' s responsibility in notifying the City of students ' possession of controlled substances; c. October Police report; d. The new Police reserves will be introduced. Also, they will start riding in unmarked cars this weekend. Lee Entner 1 . Suggested restructuring the monthly fire report to the Council to avoid repetition. The written reports will be included in the agenda packet rather than retyping them on the identical form. Carol Johnson 1 . Suggested the new accountant and any other of the office staff who wishes, should attend the February Municipal workshop on "Building Upon Your Strengths" . 2.. Mrs . Johnson received a video from Quest on utility billing system. This led to an in depth discussion on computer usage. The meeting adjourned at 3 : 45 P.M. :cjk i I Oaf 3r'th Avenue Northeast 35 � St.flAnthony, Minnesota 55421 November 13, 1987 St. Anthony City Council 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418 Dear Councilmembersa I have enjoyed my nearly three years as a Flanning Commission member and ask your consideration for another three year appointment. I feel that I have made a positive contribution to the Commission's tasks. I hope, with the experience gained during this term, to make an even greater contribution in the future. I am willing to meet with you and answer any questions that you may have. Sincerely, John R. Madden • co I'D D 0.1 fA < (-�l ::r D I.Cl --I- r-. -. 1.- 1- 'r I A fn r rt -h cl r-I -I- IT] Il., On -T n f D' ITJ a! I rt 1 -3 tl vl r-, D Ul ko n C -0 at 0 a' Fo at r— D ILl U < zi nL -4, F, I'D Ft Un. Ill rt IT D 0 ID 0 n D D in TI a U^i Cl 0 C. u _0 -T 0 rt C. :1 n. iT -', M (77i aj r+ r+ in fo r+ r+ 7 (D r+ 7 I'D . T -5 CL L9 D r-) 0 & " D -h rt r+ al 7�11 ED 'Tj n 0 7 (--1 & l< 0 0 !Z ET :Ft r -2 ID "I i p P, f,.j LO r-O f-J 10 M Cr -h ul- 0 f.,11 L, < Ln T. 31 10 :3 Z c CI- :3 P-, < 07 't . -1 0 a] 1-1 D- Pri D 1:4 I.- rD Ol r- 0 0 rt 0 (-) ll. CL .4) :3 rj I i CL 0 M n C LO I-N =1 F-- m T, LO Ln 0 rrl ul r+ H. 'D RI at 0 0 -1 < !-. 0 CA D Ll Mll at --I, 071 • David Childs City Manager City of St . Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418 Dear David; I would like to take this opportunity to submit by application for appointment to the City Planning Commission. I feel that my personal and professional background would be of benefit to the .City. I have been a resident of the City since 1978 living at 3205 Skycroft Drive. My wife, Janet, and I have two sons attending St . Anthony High School . My home telephone number. is 788-0049. I am employed by Juran & Moody, Inc . , where I act as a municipal financial consultant . I have also acted as a municipal underwriter and trader during my twelve years at the firm. I am a vice-president and stockholder. I was the company ' s executive representative to the Minnesota Instute of Public Finance from 1980 to 1985 and ' to the Texas Municipal Advisory Counsek from 1976 to 1985 . I currently serve on two- ad hoc committees providing legislative information to • the Minnesota Department of Commerce on municipal financil matters. My community service has been concentrated in the area of youth activities . I have since moving to the City been a coach and assistant coach for youth baseball and- was active as a leader in the scouting program. I would very much like to increase my activies within the community. and appreciate any consideration you may give my application. Very truly yours, Edward W. Brownell III • Leif J . Thorson 3024 Crestview Drive NE St Anthony , Minnesota 55418 • November 15 , 1987 . City Administrator St Anthony Village 3301 Silver Lake Road St Anthony , Minnesota 55418 Dear Sir : Please accept this letter as my application to serve on the City Planning Commission. I have been a homeowner in the Village for the past 8 years and have watched the neighborhoods , and in particular the Kenzie Terrace area , experiencing a great deal of change . With funding from the State and Federal government being scaled back it is vital to look to the future with crea- tive solutions to widen the tax base without undue hardships on the existing homeowners . It is for these reasons and my desire to participate and contribute to the future of the Village that I make application . I have been employed by the Soo Line Railroad for the past 10 Y ears and currently hold the position of Public Works Engineer . As Public Works Engineer I am directly responsible for coord- • ination of all publicly funded projects or improvements. in four states . I initiate and receive proposals , coordinate engineer- ing design , cost estimates , project specifications , and compli- ance with regulations . Secure funding and insure timely compl- etion of projects . I am a graduate Civil Engineer and licensed in the State of Minnesota as a professional Engineer . i I am 34 years old happily married and have the desire and ability to make a positive contribution to the City Planning Commission . Very t ly yours , Leif horson I LAWRENCE J. ANTCZAK 3501 36TH AVE N.E. • ST. ANTHONY, MN 55418 Age: 46 . Married, wife - Sandra, . Secretary w/Bio Instruments, Inc. Children: Craig, Age 21, Attends Institute of Technology Univ. of MN. Rick, Age 16, Attends St Anthony High School Resident of St Anthony since December 1979. Previously owned and lived in a duplex on Mckinley St. N.E. Parishioner of St Charles of Borromeo Church. 1965-Present Employed by: B.F. Nelson Folding Carton Company 752 30th Ave S.E. Mpls. , MN 55413 Phone - 331-1193 Position: Supervisor. In charge of cutting department which produces folding cartons. • 1960-1965 Farmer - Farmed with Parents on family Dairy Farm. Truck Driver - Hauling Lime to area farmers for local firm. 1959-1960 Attended University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin "Agriculture 'and Management Short Course " 1959 Graduated from Weyerhaeuser High School Weyerhaeuser, Wisconsin. I would like to gain a position on the Planning Commission for many reasons, I see it as a learning experience for myself, on the functioning on our city, and I think mainly, to get more involved in our community by getting to know the people and being able to help the residents of St Anthony. I was involved with the Planning Commission a few years back, when the Elmwood Lutheran Church wanted to expand. The expansion was to take place on the back of my lot line, which I thought could present problems if the expansion was done in the manner they wished. So • I can understand so►ne of the problems that arise and the frustration that can be felt. But also the posibilities of resolving them for both sides with the help and advise from our Planning Commission. h, 3121 Edward Street N.E. St. Anthony Village, MN 55418 November. 19, 1987 f St. Anthony City Council Administrative Offices 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony Village, MN 554.18 Dear Members , I read with great interest your openings for two members on the City' Planning Commission Board in the St. Anthony Village Newsletter. I would like t'o apply for the position. My resume is enclosed. My resume points out that I have had considerable experience • in pro6ect management and other various aspects of the con- struction industry. The position you have available is the kind of position, I feel, I am very qualified for. I feel that I would be an asset to the- City Planning Commission and to the further decisions made by this board in protecting the best interests of St. Anthony Village and its residents. -My wife and I have been residents of the village for the past twelve years and feel a strong commitment to the continued quality of this fine community. I would like very much 'to talk with you in person about my qualifications and desire for this position. Thank you•.for. considering me for this position. I 'll look forward to hearing from you 'soon. Sincerely, L . Jeffrey F. Shea Enclosure RESUME � Jeffrey F. Shea 3121 Edward Street N .E. St. Anthony Village , Minnesota 55418 789-7608 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE * Supervision and scheduling of construction projects. Estimating and quantity take-off. * Compiling of bids and assemblance of estimates and construction statements. * Negotiation and preparation of construction subcontracts. * Review and approval of pay requests and change orders. * Construction layout and design input. * Site visits and coordination of final inspections and completion certificates for occupancy. * Direct sales and customer service . * Business promotion. .f Written communications. EMPLOYIv7ENT HISTORY Ochs Brick and Tile Company, Eden Prairie , Minnesota. November, 1986 to present. Business of Company: Manufacturers and distributors of brick and related masonry products. Position: Sales Representative. Providence Builders/Yorkton Development, St. Paul , Minnesota. October, 1985 to November, 1986. Business of Company.: General Contractor and developer of new and existing commercial buildings. Position: Project Manager. Spancrete Midwest Company, Osseo , Minnesota. May, 1983 to October, 1985. Business of Company: Manufacturers and erectors of precast and prestressed concrete products. Position: Sales Representative. Metro Building Systems, Inc . , Minneapolis, Minnesota. May, 1978 to May, 1983- Business of Company: General Contractor specializing in design/ build and pre-engineered building systems. Position: Project Manager/Sales. EDUCATION • Dunwoody Industrial Institute , Minneapolis , Minnesota. Architectural Drafting and Construction Estimating Degree. Graduated April , 1978• Special Honors: Attendance Award. Resume `Jeffrey F. Shea Page 2 St. Paul Vocational Institute, St. Paul, Minnesota. Certificate in Drafting and Design. Irondale Sr High School, New Brighton, Minnesota. Graduated June , 1971. PERSONAL INFORMATION Marital Status:- Married, wife-'.s name-Vicki. Children: Two, Kerri-14 years (attends St. Anthony High School) and Sharla-2-°years. l Residence : Own home at 3121 Edward Street. REFERENCES Will be furnished upon request. � . 1 St . Anthony City Council Administrative Offices 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony Village, Mn. 55418 RE: Application for City Planning Commission I Would •Idke to be considered for a position on the Planning Commision Board for St . Anthony Village. I have lived in St Anthony for just over one year and as a new resident I am quite interested in issues facinq the city. Attached is a brief resume outlining my education and word: experience. I believe my past experience will allow me to be an effective member of the planning commission. • I would be happy to meet with you and discuss my qualifications and interest in greater detail . Sincerelyo UV,W4 C . Dennis E. Murphy. 3412 Downers Drive DENNIS EDWARD MURPHY ' Home Address: 3412 Downers Dr . St . Anthony Village, Mn. 55418 Home Phone: 612-789-5723 Business Phone: 612-540 `9344 EXPERIENCE Present ITT CONSUMER FINANCIAL CORPORATION, MANAGER MARKETING RESEARCH. Responsible for all corporate research projects including site location studies for corporate branch offices and strategic plans for market expansion. Responsible for monitoring and reporting key business trends for the corporation. Manages research staff of four people. April , '85- DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION, MARKET ANALYST. July, 'e7 Conducted site location research for Department stores including - word: for Target , Dayton's, Mervyn's (California based) and Lechmere (Boston based) . Extensive travel throughout the United States, meeting with city planners and economic development agencies in each city studied . July, 783- ITT CONSUMER FINANCIAL CORPORATION, MARKET ANAYLYST. April , '85 Conducted site location research* foi- corporate branch offices throughout the United States. Corporation operates in 34 states. Tracked key business®. indicators and monitored marketing programs. Jan. , 781 K.BORDNER CONSULTANTS, DIRECTOR OF MARKET RESEARCH July, 'e3 Responsible for all research reports, on land development including residential , retail , industrial , and other commercial land use. Firm provided con- sultina services to municipalities and private devel- opers. 1978-198t? U.S. PEACE CORPS VOLUNTEER, MANILA,PHILIPPINES. Trained Philippine nationals' in cartography. Worked directly with the United Nations Development' Project "Sail and Land Resources Appraisal . " INTERNSHIPS City of Bloomington; Minn. State Planning Agency; City of St . Peter EDUCATION Master of Arts. Arizona State University Geography/Land Use Planning Bachelor of Arts. Gustavus Adolphus College Geography/Social Studies • DATE : December 2 . 1987 TO: City Council Members FROM: Don Hickerson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Purchase of Marked Squad Vehicle The 1987 Chevrolet Caprice we purchased for use as a marked squad has given us excellent service: The Caprice, again this year, was tops in the Michigan Police vehicle testing and averaged 2 miles per gallon better in overall fuel economy than the other full-size vehicles tested. I recommend that we purchase a 1988 Chevrolet Caprice, for use as a marked squad, on the Hennepin County bid. (The deadline for ordering from this bid is December 21, 1987 . ) Thane' Hawkins Polar Chevrolet, -White Bear Lake, MN was low bidder. The price including the ,desired options is $12, 006 . • • 1 RESOLUTION 87-041 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ST. ANTHONY CHIEF OF POLICE TO EXECUTE THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 282 AND THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the Minnesota Laws 1987 , Chapter 295 , requires the establishment of a pre-assessment team for each school within the District and, further requires the adoption of a Memorandum of Understanding between the District and the Police Department providing for an exchange of information in order to further the District ' s policies for the prevention, detection, and treatment of chemical abuse and to facilitate mutual capabilities for addressing criminal activity by students involved with. drugs . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Anthony City Council hereby authorizes the Chief of Police to execute said Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the City of St. Anthony Police Department. Adopted this day of _ 1987 . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for administration: City Manager • • DATE: December 1, 1987 TO: City Council Members FROM: Don Hickerson; Chief of Police SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding The Minnesota State Legislature in its 1987 regular session enacted Chapter 295," which deals with Controlled Substances, Chemical Abuse and Contraband; establishing Chemical Abuse and pre-assessment teams and community advisory teams; requiring teachers to report possession, use, - and transfer. of Chemical substances by students. It also requires that a:vtitten memorandum of understanding be developed between school .personnel - and law enforcement agencies , identifying when the school shall notify the local law enforcement agency that a violation . of its drug and alcohol. -policy- has occurred, and when the law enforce- ment' agency shall notify the school chemical abuse pre-assess- ment team of incidents occurring off the school premises involy- ing . chemical abuse by students enrolled in that school pursuant to the possession or purchase of alcohol in violation of section 340A. 503, Subd. 2 or 3, or in the' case' of controlled substances, a violation of section 152 . 09 , Subd. 1. • The Hennepin County Attorney met with the Hennepin County' Chief' s of Police and School authorities and came up with the attached memorandum- of understanding. The final draft of the memorandum was reviewed with .our school authorities and will be going to the School Board for approval.. I' would ' request that the City ,Council review and approve the memorandum of understanding to be. signedby the school and the Police Department. • ' THOMAS L.JOHNSON PHONE vIN COUNTY ATTORNEY c?��oGy (612)348-3091 g P• • 4jNIVES OFFICE OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY 2000 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNE OTA 554$7 Novemter 2 , 1987 Chief Donald Hickerson St . Anthony Village Police Department 3301 Silver Lake Road. St.. Anthony, MN 55418 Dear Don: I have enclosed a proposed Memorandum of Understanding which we. believe is in accordance. with the provisions . o.t . Minnesota Laws of 1987 , Chapter 295, and which we hope can be -quickly adopted by Hennepin County School Districts and- . Law Enforcement Agencies . The Memorandum has four objectives : 1 . To expand the information that school districts and law enforcement agencies can share with one another concerning drug use by juveniles; • 2 . To allow school districts to have the first opportunity to deal with drug use by students; and 3 . To use Hennepin County Juvenile Court as the back- up to the school ' s effort to deal with drug abuse on a voluntary basis . 4 . To ensure stiffer consequences for juveniles who use drugs and engage in other criminal activity. We are very grateful for all the help we have received in drafting the enclosed proposal . Many school and law eArorc`e iCe l"i: rcl_)Lesentatives a�lended meetings, shared information, and raised questions, all of which was invaluable to us . Your continued help is needed, however . Please review the enclosed Memorandum and determine whether your department can agree to its terms--I certainly hope this will be the case . If you can, please communicate your support to the school superintendent for your community and to Sonya Steven, an assistant county attorney in our office ( 348-7916 ) . We will ask you to sign the Memorandum once the Community School Advisory Team has taken supportive action. To assist in moving this process along, Sonya is available to meet with you, your officers or community representatives • to discuss the Memorandum and to answer questions . HENNEPIN COUNTY IS AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 4 • Our goal is to gain . county-wide . approval of the Memorandum of Understanding, so that each Hennepin County law enforcement agency and school district can fully cooperate with one ' another in seeking to achieve the purposes of Chapter 295 . Thank you in advance for your help. Sincerely, THOMAS. L. OHNSON Hennepin County Attorney TLJ: cm • I 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WHEREAS, Independent School District i. (hereinafter, District) and the Police Department --Tor the -City of , (hereinafter., Department) recocnize that there i.s a rug problem among our youth' that interferes with their behavior, learning, and fullest possible development;- and WHEREAS, the District "has implemented' - a Drug and Alcohol' Policy a and chemical health'program- of prevention, intervention, referral and aftercare, thereby assisting in the prevention of chemical abuse among students and providing appropriate services to those students who become involved with drugs; and WHEREAS--recognizing that chemical dependency is a treatable • illness--student drug problems should be handled in the first instance within the school or community rather than through court intervention, unless the drug use is accompanied by other criminal activities; and WHEREAS, Court-ordered treatment of juvenile chemical abuse should be reserved for those individuals who commit crimes in conjunction with the use of drugs or who require Court intervention to enhance the likelihood of successful treatment; and WHEREAS, enhanced prosecutorial efforts are appropriate where juveniles having a history of chemical abuse commit criminal acts other than drug or alcohol use, and thus an awareness of a student's repeated chemical use is a relevant factor for law enforcement to consider in evaluating cases presented to them for investigation; and . WHEREAS, Minn. Laws 1987, Chapter 295, requires the' establishment of a pre-assessment team for each school within the District and, further requires the adoption of a Memorandum of Understanding between the District and the Department providing for an exchange of information in order to further the District' s policies for the prevention, detection, and treatment of chemical abuse and to facilitate mutual capabilities for addressing criminal activity by students involved with drugs; 1 • BE IT HEREBY AGREED between the District and the Department that, in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Laws 1987, Chapter 295, the following exchanges of information are agreed upon and authorized: I. The school administration representative on each school pre-assessment ' team ..shall give written notice to the Department with jurisdiction at the site -'of the school and -'to the Taw enforcement- agency with jurisdiction- at the '' student' s residence, if different agencies are involved, of all violations of the District Drug and Alcohol Policy involving the unlawful use, possession,. or sale of drugs or alcohol . - II: The Department shall give written notice to the District for the student' s school pre-assessment team whenever an incident occurs off school premises in which a student is involved in a violation of: • A. The provisions of Minn. Stat. Section 340A. 503,, Subd. 2 or 3, regarding the possession or purchase of alcoholic beverages, or B. The provisions of Minn. Stat. Section 152.09, Subd. 1 , regarding the possession or sale of a controlled or simulated controlled substance, or C. The provisions of other statutes which are specified as reportable to the pre-assessment team in future-enacted amendments to Minn. Laws 1987 , Chapter 295. These violations shall be reported to the appropriate school ' s pre-assessment team regardless of whether the incident will be referred to Hennepin County Juvenile ' Court by Department personnel III. With regard to a matter reported to the Department by a school pre-assessment team, upon a determination that probable cause exists and unless the interests of i justice require otherwise, the Department shall refer the matter to the Hennepin County Attorney's Office in •. the following instances: 2 • A. Any case involving the illegal sale or distribution of drugs, simulated controlled substances., or alcohol. B. Upon a. student's third • violation of school regulations concerning use or possession of. drugs or alcohol on school premises or at school-sponsored events C. Upon a student' s second . violation of such . regulations if there has been a previous . . failure of the student to cooperate with the District' s drug and alcohol , policies, or if other circumstances dictate Juvenile Court intervention to facilitate assessment ;or treatment. D. Upon a student's first violation of such regulations when, within the previous year'' the student has. n bee adjudicated delinquent with '.regard to one felony-level offense or two or more misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor level. offenses. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Memorandum has been signed on the dates below-indicated by the following District and Department representatives, and will continue in effect until superseded by a new Memorandum or specifically rescinded in writing: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT # POLICE DEPARTMENT By: By: Its: Its: Dated: Dated: 3 J 1 1. RESOLUTION 87-042 �I I A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT ; WHEREAS, pursuant to motion of the Council passed July 22 , 1986 , a report has been prepared by Rieke Carroll Muller Associates , Inc . (RCM) with reference to the improvement of St. Anthony Boulevard between the Burlington Northern Bridge and the southern City limits line to reconstruct the existing roadway with a new bituminous roadway ' with new curb and gutter and replacing' existing catch basins and leads, and this report was received by the Council on January 27 , 1987 . NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA: .l . The Council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improve- ment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an esti- mated total cost of the improvement of $440 , 000 . 00 . 2 . A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 12th day of January, 1988 , in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8 : 00 P.M. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted this day of 1987 . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for administration: City Manager Decision Resources Ltd. TO: Dave Childs, City Manager FROM: Bill Morris DATE: December 4, 1987 SUBJECT: Several Observations about the Draft . of the City Survey First , let me assure- you that the questionnaire is not too long. We have been very successful in administering even longe.r. surveys in other suburban areas. . - Having had extensive experience in product , politi.cal ,. and consumer telephone studie.s,. we have -found that quality of life surveys -are in a class- of their own. Most respondents are pleased, An fact, eager , to be contacted and . asked for their opinions about- their community. In our last two studies in. Roseville, with a s.imilar age structure to Saint • Anthony, and Cottage Grove, with a somewhat distinctive age mix , our refusal rates were minimal -- less than two percent . _ Each survey was also longer that your current draft . Again, let me assure you -'without qualification that the residents will not rebel at the length of this draft ! The survey can be conveniently broken down into several topical areas. The objective of the study is to .measure citizen satisfaction on a series of issues facing- the city : from basic . services to future plans. In ' addition, throughout the instrument , tax and assessment cost considerations have been explic-itly discussed to provide a. more rea-listic basis for evaluation. DEMOGRAPHICS. These questionn .are. -used'--to not .-.only establish a - profile of the residents, but to- permit breakdowns by various groups (e.g . , seniors, long-term- res-idents, etc . ) of the answers to other queries. Questions #1-10, #104-112. QUALITY OF LlFE .- This set measures general satisfaction with the - city and its direction. A perceived high quality of life is normally a precondition for a satisfied • citizenry . When discontent is detected in these questions, it normally revolves around a more complex policy direction (e.g . , development ) than a single municipal issue. Questions -#11-24, #63, #64 . • CITY SERVICE ` CUTS AND TAXES. - . - In an era of tight budgets and rising costs, many cities are faced with the dilemma of either increasing , taxes to maintain services or cutting selected 3128 Dean COLAI e Minneapohs, \-linnesota 55416 ® (6,1 2) 920-0337 categories. The •specificity . of the options given, citizens 'w.il l' 1.- 1' provide very useful data for future decisions. Questions CITY SERVICES. Both general satisfaction- with services, as well as specific aspects of several selected services , are obtained in this section of the study. Questions #34-42, #65, #86-88. POLICY OPTIONS. Citizens were asked their views on a set of developing issues within Saint Anthony: recycling and garbage, water , street maintenance, codes, parks and recreation, flooding , the municipal liquor stores, and fire/police services. Questions #47-54 , #61-63, #66-69, #73-79, #80-85, #89, #90, #95-99. CITY GOVERNMENT . Residents were asked about their degree of knowledge and evaluation of city government . Questions #43, #44 . CITY STAFF. Saint Anthony residents were asked to evaluate the personnel side of government service provision, both in City Hall and on the street . Questions #45, #46, #55-60, #91-94 . CITY HALL. Citizens` were asked for guidance about future municipal facilities. Questions #70-72. COMMUNICATIONS. The means and effectiveness of information dis- semination.. ' have consequences 'for the long-term integ- ration of the population. Questions .#100-103. The analysis .of the results of. this . study will not "only provide a complete p..i-cture of the current satisfaction and dissatisfaction in the city, but also unbiased data for future policy planning in a number of areas. One observation: `the order of the questions has been deliberately . " jumbled" to maintain the interest of the respondent . In all cases, though , questions which call for a top-of-the-mind conclusion from the interviewee precede closed- ended fixed response inquiries on a similar topic . I hope this memorandum satisfactorily explains the intent of the draft questionnaire. I will be happy to respond to any questions, comments, or suggestions you and the Council may have ' at the next Meeting . We are very pleased to be working with you ! DECISION RESOURCES, LTD. SAINT ANTHONY CITY SURVEY • 3128 Dean Court City Services/Policies/Demos Minneapolis , Minnesota 55414 Draft 2 . 1 Hello , I 'm of Decision Resources, Ltd . , a nationwide polling firm. We're talking with people in Saint Anthony today and would like to ask you a few questions on a confidential basis . (DO NOT PAUSE) 1 . Approximately how long -have you LESS THAN TWO YEAR. . . . . . I lived in Saint Anthony? 2 - 5 YEARS. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 6 - 10 YEARS. . . . . . . . . . . .3 11 - 20 YEARS. . . . . . . . . . . 4 21 - 30 YEARS. . . . . . . . . . .5 OVER THIRTY YEARS. . . . . . .6 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .? 2. In what city and/or state was your immediate prior residence located? ------------------------------------------------------------ 3. As things now stand , how long in LESS THAN TWO YEAR. . . . . . 1 the future do you expect to live 2 - 5 YEARS. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 in Saint Anthony? 6 - 10 YEARS. . . . . . . . . . . . 3 • OVER TEN YEARS. . . . . . . . . .4. REST OF LIFE (VOL. ) . . . . .5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .6 Could you please tell me how many people in each of the following age groups live; in your household. Let 's start oldest to youngest . 4. First , persons over 65? 5. Other adults? 6. College students? 7. High school aged (grades 10-12) ? S. Junior high aged children (grades 7-9) ? 9. Elementary school aged (grades K-8) ? 10. Pre-schoolers? 11 . How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . I life in Saint Anthony -- excel- GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 • lent , good , only fair , or poor? ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 5 1 12: Over the�next five years, do you DECLINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 expect the quality of life in REMAIN ABOUT THE SAME-2 • Saint Anthony to decline , remain IMPROVE. 3 about the same, or improve? DON.' T * KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 4 � 13. What do you like MOST about living in Saint Anthony? ------------------------------------------------------------ i 14 . What do you like LEAST about living in Saint Anthony? ------------------------------------------------------------ II 15. Do you think that things in Saint RIGHT DIRECTION. . . . . . . . . I 4 Anthony are moving in the right WRONG TRACK. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 direction or do you feel they DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .3 I have gotten off on the wrong track? IF "WRONG TRACK" IN QUESTION #15, ASK: 16. Why do you feel that way? 1 ------------------------------------------------------- • I ------------------------------------------------------- 17. How much pride do you take in the GREAT DEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Village of Saint Anthony as a QUITE A LOT . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 i place to live -- a great deal , SOME. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 quite a lot , some, or very VERY LITTLE. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 little? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .5 i 18. In general , do you . feel that the YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 City of Saint Anthony is a good NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 place to raise children? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . .3 IF RESPONSE GIVEN IN QUESTION #18, ASK: 19. Why do you feel that way? ------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------. . . . . . ---------------- 20. If you had the chance, would you YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 like to move away from your NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 residence in Saint Anthony? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #20, ASK: is 2 21 . Why would. you like to move? ' • ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- 22. Where would you like to INTO MILAN/ST. PAUL . . . . . . 1 move? WITHIN ST . ANTHONY. . . . . .2 ANOTHER SUBURB. . . . . . . . . . 3 FURTHER FROM DOWNTOWN. . .4 OUT OF MINNESOTA. . . . . . . .5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .6 23. If you were moving to another city, what factor would be most important to you in selecting your new place of residence? - -------------------------------------------'----------------- IF RESPONSE GIVEN IN QUESTION #23, ASK: 24 . How would you rate Saint EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Anthony on that -- excel- GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 lent , good , only fair , or ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 poor? POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .5 25. If it were needed to maintain FAVOR. . : : : � : : : : : : : : : : : . . 1 city services at their current OPPOSE — level , would you favor or oppose DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 an increase in city property taxes? 26. Do you consider property taxes in EXCESSIVELY HIGH. . . . . . . . I Saint Anthony to be excessively RELATIVELY HIGH. . . . . . . . .2 high , relatively high , about ABOUT AVERAGE. . . . . . . . . . .3 average, or comparatively low? COMPARATIVELY LOW. . . . . . . 4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .5 I would like to read you a list of changes in city services which could be made to avoid increases in taxes or special assessments. For each one, please tell me if you would favor that change as an alternative to higher taxes, or if you would oppose that change even if it meant higher taxes . FAVOR OPPOSE D.K . /REF. 27. Increase the time it takes police to respond to a non-emergency call to save funding more positions. 1 2 3 28 . Increase the use of volunteer fire • fighters in order to save funding . 1 2 3 3 i FAVOR OPPOSE D.K. /REF. r' •29. Increase the time it takes to Plow cit,y streets after a snow storm . 1 2 3 30. Decrease the amount of funds spent on the maintenance and upkeep of city parks. 1 3 31 . Reduce the number of street maintenance projects undertaken each year . 1 2 3 32. Reduce the frequency of inspec- tions and response time to com- plaints about violations of city residential codes. 1 2 3 i As you may know, property taxes are divided between the City of Saint Anthony, Hennepin or Ramsey County , and your local public school district . it 33. For each dollar of property taxes UNDER TEN PERCENT. . . . . . . 1 you pay, about what percentage do 10% TO 20%. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 you think goes to city govern- 21% TO 30%. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .3 men t? 31% TO 40'/.. .': . . . . . . . . . . .4 • 41% TO 50%. . . . . . . . . . . .5 51% TO 60%. . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 61% TO 70%. . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 OVER SEVENTY PERCENT. . . .8 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .9 I would like to read you a list of a few city services. For each One, please tell me whether you would . rate the quality of the service as excellent , good , only fair , or poor . I EXC GOOD ONLY POOR D.K. / -i FAIR REF . j 34. Park Maintenance 1 2 3 4 5 35. Snow Plowing 1 2 3 4 . 5 36. . Police Protection 1 2 3 4 5 37. Fire Protection 1 2 3 4 5 38. City Street Maintenance 1 2 3 4 5 I i 39 . Animal Control 1 2 3 4 5 • 40. Storm Sewers 1 2 3 4 5 4 i EXC GOOD ONLY POOR D.K. / • FAIR REF . 41 . Water 1 2 3 4 5 IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR" IN QUESTIONS #34-41 , ASK FOR EACH ONE: 42. Why did you rate ------------ as (only fair/poor ) ? ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- Let ' s talk about Saint Anthony City Government for a few minutes. When many people think about their local government , they think of the elected officials who represent them. . . . 43 . How much do you feel you know GREAT DEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 about the work of the Mayor and FAIR AMOUNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 City Council -- a great deal , VERY LITTLE. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 a fair amount , or very little? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .4 44 . From what you know, do you approve STRONGLY APPROVE. . . . . . . . 1 or disapprove of the job the Mayor SOMEWHAT APPROVE. . . . . . . .2 and City Council are doing? ( WAIT SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE. . . . .3 • FOR RESPONSE ) And do you feel STRONGLY DISAPPROVE . . . . .4 strongly that way? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . .. . . .5 45. How much first-hand contact have QUITE A LOT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 you had with the Saint Anthony SOME. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 - City staff -- quite a lot , some, VERY LITTLE. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 or very little? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .4 46 . From what you have seen or heard , EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I how would you rate the job per- GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 formance of the Saint Anthony ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 City staff -- excellent , good , POOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 only fair , or poor? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .5 Hennepin and Ramsey Counties will soon require all residents to separate recyclables from their trash . The City of Saint Anthony is currently reviewing alternatives to comply with the county requirement . 47. Do you currently separate recy- YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I clables from the rest of your NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 2 garbage? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #47, ASK: Which of the following materials do you recycle? 5 YES NO D.K. REF . 48 . Glass? 1 2 3 4 • 49. -Newspapers and cardboard? 1 2 3 4 50. Metal and aluminum? 1 2 3 4 51 . How and where do you recycle them? ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- One possible approach to meeting the county requirement would be to offer incentives to residents to do their own separation of recyclables from their garbage. . . . 52. Would you favor or oppose the city FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I arranging to base garbage collec- OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 tion fees upon the amount of re- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 fuse a household sets out , so that households which recycle would be charged less? Another approach would be to contract with refuse haulers to separate recyclables for all households AFTER they have picked up the garbage. An advantage is that the county requirement is met with no need for further action by residents. A disadvantage is that all citizens would pay the same additional cost : • 53. Would you favor or oppose t.his FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I approach? OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 As you may know, several refuse haulers serve Saint Anthony. This arrangement has permitted citizens to choose their own haulers and contract directly with them. But , it has also created significant overlap between the haulers and increased noise and congestion on city streets. 54 . Of the following three proposals, PROPOSAL A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 which do you most favor : PROPOSAL B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 A. The City contracts with one PROPOSAL C. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 hauler to serve the entire city. DON'T CARE ( VOL. ) . . . . . . . 4 B. The City contracts with a DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .5 group of haulers, each serving one area of Saint Anthony exclu- sively. C . The present system . 55. Have you visited Saint Anthony YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I City Hall during the past twelve NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 months? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #55, ASK : • 6 a For ' each of the Poll-owing characterist-ics, please rate the • Saint Anthony City Hall facility or- staff as excellent , good , only fair , or poor . . . . I EXC GOOD, ONLY POOR D.K. / FAIR REF . 56 . Waiting time for service? 1 2 3 4 5 57. Courtesy of the staff? 1 2 3 4 5 58. Efficiency of the staff? 1 2 3 4 5 59. Atmosphere of City Hall ? 1 2 3 4 5 60. Cleanliness of the building? 1 2 3 4 5 The water supply for the City was contaminated by waste products from the Twin Cities Army Arsenal facility' in Arden Hills. The federal government has agreed to build a carbon filtration system to purify the city' s water supply . In the meantime, the State of Minnesota has certified that the current purity of the water meets state requirements. 61 . Are you currently using city ABOUT AS MUCH. . . . . . . . . . . 1 water about as much as you did CUT BACK IN USE. . . . . . . . . 2 prior to the discovery of the TAKE PRECAUTIONS ( VOL . ) .3 contamination, or have you cut DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .4 back in its use? 62. Do you feel that the filtration SUFFICIENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I system will be sufficient to pro- FURTHER ACTION. . . . . . . . . . 2 tect the water supply , or should DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .3 the city undertake further action? IF "FURTHER ACTION" IN QUESTION #62, ASK: 63 . What further action should the city undertake? ------------------------------------------------------ 63. How would you rate the quality EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I of education in the public GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 schools in Saint Anthony -- ONLY FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 • excellent , good , only fair , or POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 poor? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .5 7 I'F "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR" -IN ,QUESTION 463, ASK: 64 . Why do you feel that way? • ------------------------------------------------------- ------------=------------------------------------------ Traditionally , the City has provided residents with basic ser- vices , such as police and fire protection, street maintenance, and snow plowing . Some cities also provide social services to their residents, such as Chemical Abuse Programs, Counseling , Day Care, and Senior Services. 65. Would you favor or oppose the YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 City of Saint Anthony expanding NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 its current service provision DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 to include social services? 66. In general , do you feel that the SERIOUS PROBLEM. . . . . . . . . 1 condition and upkeep of city MINOR PROBLEM. . . . . . . . . . . 2 streets is a serious problem in NO PROBLEM. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Saint Anthony, a minor problem, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 4 or no problem at all ? 67 . Street maintenance could be dra- FAVOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 matically improved in the City if OPPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 citizens accepted an additional DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 assessment of $200 per year . Would you favor or oppose this assessment? 68. Do you feel that the City is too TOO TOUGH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 tough , about right , or not tough ABOUT RIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 enough in enforcing the City Code NOT TOUGH ENOUGH. . . . . . . .3 regarding residential property DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .4 maintenance for weed control , outdoor storage, junk cars, animal control , " and noise? IF "TOO TOUGH" OR "NOT TOUGH ENOUGH" IN QUESTION #68, ASK: 69. Why do you feel that way? ------------------------------------------------------- There has been some discussion lately about the need to evaluate the adequacy of current city facilities. As you may know, City Offices and the Police Department are contained in the former Parkview Elementary School Building , which is still owned by the School District . Space remaining in the building is used by both • the School District and other organizations. The Fire Department is located in the Old Fire Station in the southern part of Saint 8 . Anthony , - which will require -extensive renovation in the near • future. i i There are three courses of action which the City could follow: A) Continue to rent space from the School District and modernize ' i the Old Fire Station; in other words, basically keeping everything as it is. B) Buy the Parkview Elementary School Building , remodel the facility into a Community Center , containing City Offices and the Police Department , space for community organizations, and reno- vate the building to permit the Fire Department to move into it . C ) Build a new City Center facility , separate from the Parkview j School site, to house city offices, the Police and Fire Departments, and community rooms to meet residential needs. I 70. Of these three proposals, which PROPOSAL A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 do you most favor? PROPOSAL B. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 PROPOSAL C. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 3 NONE OF THE ABOVE. . . . . . .4 DON'T CARE (VOL. ) . . . . . . .5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .6 IF PROPOSAL CHOSEN IN QUESTION #70, ASK: • 71 . Why did you select Option -----? ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- Some actions taken by the City may require the passage of a bond referendum. 72. How much would you be willing to NOTHING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I pay in additional property taxes $20. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 to support renovations and/or $40. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 construction of new city facil- $60. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 ities. ( START WITH A RANDOMLY $80. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 SELECTED CHOICE FROM #1 - #8) $100. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Let 's say, would you be willing $120. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 to pay $------ per year? (MOVE DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .8 TO NEXT CHOICE UP OR DOWN/REPEAT) I would like to read you a brief list of parks in Saint Anthony. For each one please tell me if you or members of your household visited or used the facilities at . . . . YES NO D.K . /REF . • 73. Emerald Park? 1 2 3 74 . Central Park? 1 2 3 75 . Silver Point Park? 1 2 3 9 IF RESPONDENT REPORTS VISITING ANY PARK IN QUESTIONS #73- #75, ASK : I, would like you to rate the facilities in those parks with which you are familiar . Please rate each as excellent , good , only fair , or poor . First . . . . EXC GOOD ONLY POOR D.K . / FAIR REF . 76. Playground equipment? 1 2 3 4 5 77. Tennis courts? 1 2 3 4 5 78. Picnic shelters? 1 2 3 4 5 79. Skating rinks? 1 2 3 4 5 The City of Saint Anthony owns and operates two package or off- sale liquor stores . 80. During the past year , have you YES. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . I or members of this household , 'NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 purchased any products? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . ... .3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #81 , ASK: • Were the staff. . . . YES NO D.K . /REF . 82 . Courteous? 1 2 3 83. Helpful ? 1 2 3 84 . Knowledgable about their products? 1 2 3 85 . Are there any improvements in the facility, staff , or product selection that you would like to see made? ------------------------------------------------------- I would like you to rate the appearance of each of the following areas in the city. Please tell me if you find their appearance pleasing , neutral , or displeasing . . . . PLEAS NEUTR ­ DISPL D.K. / REF . 86. City Parks . 1 2 3 4 87. Entrances to the community . 1 2 3 4 10 PLEAS NEUTR DISPL D.K . / • REF . 88. Commercial areas. 1 2 3 4 • 89. How serious a problem is the MAJOR PROBLEM. . . . . . . . . . . I flooding after storms of streets MINOR PROBLEM. . . . . . . . . . . 2 and homes in Saint Anthony -- a NOT A PROBLEM. . . . . . . . . . . 3 major problem, minor problem, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 4 or not a problem at all ? The Saint Anthony Fire Department is currently half full-time employees and half part-time volunteers. 90. Do you feel that the City should MORE FULL TIME . . . . , . . . . . I rely more heavily on full-time • CURRENT MIX ADEQUATE. . . .2 employees, or is the current mix DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 adequate to serve Saint Anthony? For each of the following departments, please tell me if you have had personal contact with employees from that Department during the past year . For those employees you have encountered while they were working , could you tell me if you felt the personnel were courteous and helpful , or not? • NO FAV UNF D.K . CON CON CON REF . 91 . Saint Anthony Police Department Employees . 1 2 3 4 92 . Saint Anthony Fire Department Employees. 1 2 3 4 93. City Public Works Employees on street and road projects 1 2 3 4 94 . City Building Inspectors 1 2 3 4 95. Are you aware of the Saint NOT AWARE... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Anthony Crimewatch Program? AWARE/NOT MEMBER. . . . . . . .2 (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Are you AWARE/MEMBER. . . . . . . . . . . .3 a member of that program? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 4 96. Do you feel that the amount of TOO LITTLE . . . . . . . . : . . . . . 1 police patrolling in your neigh- ABOUT RIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 borhood is too little, about TOO MUCH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 right , or too much? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .4 IF "TOO LITTLE" IN QUESTION #96, ASK: • 11 97. Would you favor or oppose FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I ` 'the hiring of more police OPPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..2 • officers to expand patrols, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.-. . . . .3 even if it meant an in- crease in property taxes? 98. In general , do you feel that YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I city. streets are adequately NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 lighted? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 IF "NO" IN QUESTION #98, ASK: 99. Why do you feel that way? Do any locations come to mind? ------------------------------------------------------- 100. What is your principal source of information about city government and its activities? ------------------------------------------------------------ 101 . Does your household currently YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 receive cable television? NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #101 , ASK: • 102. If City Council and other VERY LIKELY. .. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 board meetings were tele- SOMEWHAT LIKELY . . . . . . . . .. 2 vised , how likely is it NOT AT ALL LIKELY. . . . . . . 3 you would occasionally watch DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 4 -- very likely, somewhat likely, or not at all likely? IF "NO" IN QUESTION #101 , ASK : 103. Is there a particular reason why you don' t subscribe to the service? ------------------------------------------------------- Now, just a few more questions for demographic purposes. . . . 104 . Do you own or rent your present OWN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 residence? RENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 105. Which of the following best SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. . 1 describes your residence? APARTMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 (READ CHOICES) TOWNHOUSE/CONDOMINIUM. . . 3 OTHER. .4 • OTHER : DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .5 ------------------------ 12 106. What is your age, please? 18-24 . i . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . I • (READ CATEGORIES) 25-34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 35-44 . . 3 45-54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 55-64. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 65 AND OVER. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 107. What is the occupation of the read of this household? ------------------------------------------------------------ "Snowbirds" are Minnesotans who take their vacations in the Winter and go to warmer places. 108. Are you and your household "snow- YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I birds"? NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 109. What is your present marital SINGLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 status, please? Are you pre- MARRIED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 sently single, married , divorced DIVORCED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 or widowed? WIDOWED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 IF "MARRIED" IN QUESTION #109, .ASK: • 110. Do both spouses work outside YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 the home? NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 111 . Can you tell me approximately BELOW $10,000. . . . . . . . . . . 1 what is the level of income for $10,001-$20,000. . . . . . . . .2 all members of your household $20,001-$30,000. . . . . . . . .3 before any taxes? Is the total $30,001-$40,000. . . . . . . . .4 annual income: $40,001-$50,000. . . . . . . . .5 (READ CHOICES #1-#7) $50,001-$60,000. . . . . . . . .6 $60,001-$70,000. . . . . . . . .7 OVER $70,000 . . . . . . . . . . . .8 DON' T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 112 . Sex ( BY OBSERVATION: DO NOT ASK) MALE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 FEMALE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Thank you very much for your time. LIST - -------------------------------------- PHONE NUMBER ------------------------------ • INTERVIEWER ------------------------------- DATE ----------------------------- 13 C 2 TY O�' S T . ANTHONY � HOU S =N G AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHOR�TY AGENDA ' D E C EMB E R 8 , 1 9 8 7 1 . Call to Order. 2 . Roll Call. 3 . Approval of November 24, 1987 H.R.A. Minutes. 4 . Claims . a. Dorsey & Whitney - $2 , 294 . 29 . 5 . Update from Dick Krier on Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project. 6 . Adjournment. : cjk • C = TY (D IF ST m ANTHONY H OU S =N G AND RE D.EVE L O PMF NT AUTHOR2 TY M2NUTES .. �-'. NOVEMBER 24 , 1 3'8 7 1 The meeting was called to order at 5 : 40 P.M. by Chair Sundland. . 2 Present- for- roll call: Sundland, Vice Chair Enrooth, Secretary/ 3 Treasurer Marks , and Commissioners Ranallo 4 and Makowske. 5 Also present: David Childs, Executive Director 6 William Soth, H.R.A. Attorney 7 Richard Krier, Development Advisory Services, 8 H.R.A. Planning Consultant 9 NOVEMBER 10 , 1987 H.R.A. MINUTES 10 Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Marks , to approve as presented. 11 Motion carried unanimously. 12 Guidance Sought, Re: Alternatives for Moving Final Phases of Kenzie WTerrace Redevelopment Project Ahead 14 Mr. Krier reported on discussions with Mr. Alan Hamel, Gaughan 15 Company President, regarding the problems his firm faced on October 16 19th when they received a dramatic raise in both the rated and 17 unrated interest rates for the Revenue Housing Bonds and bank charges 18 for backing their Letter of Credit. Mr. Krier indicated the problem, 19 as he saw it, was that the City now had a redeveloper who had the 20 capability for putting up his own Letter of Credit or getting financ- 21 ing if any one could, but for business reasons, he decided to delay 22 executing the redevelopment Agreement with the H.R.A. until he had 23 first secured either an acceptable FHA conditional commitment or 24 letter of credit backing like that being negotiated with the Des 25 Moines Midland Bank, as reported in Mr. Hamel' s November� 23rd letter 26 to the H.R.A. , distributed before the meeting. 27 Mr. Krier indicated he had to assume further financial help from the 28 City to move the project along was not an issue with the Gaughan 29 Companies, but rather , had to agree with Mr. Soth' s assessment that 30 the redevelopers had the financial strength to do the project by .31 themselves but the interest rates had gone so high the numbers no 32 longer worked for them to make a profit on the project. The Attorney 33 then suggested the City should try to get Arkell completely out of 34 the, picture by offering a settlement which, because of his present 35 situation, he might be tempted to take. • 1 Mr. Soth' pointed oat that'�'$23 , 000 , 000 had always- been more than was 2 needed when compared to• the $8 , 500 ,000 -in project costs, so the 3 $11 , 500 , 000.,. whic'h ,� remain in revenue bonds after December 1st, . should 4 certainly be..adequate to get the project done. 5 He was instructed to- teli the Gaughan Companies the H.R.A. wanted to 6 schedule meetings - with them every two weeks, starting with a meeting 7 after the Council ' s December 8th. meeting, so they could keep track 8 of their financing progress and was requesting the lines of communica- 9 tion be kept open between meetings. The planner indicated the only 10 reason the redeveloper was not present for that meeting was- because he 11 had requested they not come. He said he really believed both 12 Gaughan and Piper Jaffray, who were placing the bonds, were working 13 hard on the deal; but having the redeveloper report back every two 14 weeks might apply pressure on Piper to get the financing package put 15 together as soon as possible. 16 It was agreed that further contact with the other developer who had 17 proposed to do the project would not be completely foreclosed in the 18 meantime because the H.R.A. wanted the Gaughan Companies to understand 19 the City intends to get the project done one -way or another since 20 they have not signed the agreement as scheduled. 21 It was further agreed that the Mayor and Mr. Childs would broach Mr. 22 Arkell regarding a settlement. Mr. Arkell would be advised that the 23 H.R.A. needs the extra $300 , 000 now that the drop in prime rate had 24 created a problem with getting another redeveloper and the landowner 25 was threatening to sue the City for that failure. 26 The H.R.A. meeting was adjourned at 6: 35 P.M. with the Council meeting 27 opening at 7 : 30 P.M. , as scheduled. 28 Respectfully submitted, 29 Helen Crowe, Secretary 30 :cjk 2 • DO-RSEY & WHITNEY 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST NIINNF'APOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (012 1 :340-2000 (Internal Revenue Account No. 41"0223337) STATENIFNT OF ACCOUNT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES November 30, 1987 Mr. David NI. Childs Executive Director Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 Re.: Housing- and Redevelopment- Authority For legal services rendered from October 1, 1987 , through October 31, 1987, including: Attend HRA Meeting on October 13, 1987: $ 74 . 00 Gaughan Companies : Revise Redevelopment Agreement; compute City ' s out-of-pocket costs to be paid by Arkell and prepare statement ; send letter to P. Brinkman re same; • telephone Gaughan attorney; telephone R. Krier; inter-office conference with J. Gilligan re replacement of Arkell on housing bonds ; revise Redevelopment Contract ; review and finalize Redevelopment Contract and Guaranty, and prepare Resolution re approval of same ; send letter to the Mayor and Councilmembers ; telephone conference R. Krier re Redevelopment Contract; inter-office conference with J. Gilligan and P. Brinkman ,re termination of Arkand Redevelopment i Contract, matters regarding pay off of one bond issue, handling of arbitrage, and new Agreement with Arkand; telephone conference with P. Brinkman re bill for HRA costs; conference with J. Gilligan re Agreement with Arkand; telephone attorney for Meta; send letter to Gaughan attorney re title insurance; telephone conferences with P. Brinkman and J. Gilligan re revision of Agreement with Arkand; meet with Title Company, Surveyor, Gaughan attorney and D. Childs re title matters ; telephone P. Brinkman re closing; . telephone calls with P. Brinkman, J. Gilligan and D. Krier re signing with Gaughan and Arkand; "telephone conference with D. Childs : $2 , 127 . 50 i r TOTAL FEES $2 , 201. 50 • PLUS DISBURSEMENTS (as per attached sheet) 92 , 79 TOTAL FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS $2, 294°29 WRS :gle 615 178820 : 74 , 81 Disbursements made I'm Four aCCllUnt, for which hills have not yet been received,will appear on a late, statenlellt.