Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 07252000 Meeting Sheet IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII 100568 Box: 17 Folder: CC PACKETS 1999-2001 Document: CC PACKET 07252000 _H.R.A. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING _ REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. CITY OF ST. ANTHONY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA July 25, 2000 7:00 PM Council Chambers PAGE(S) I. CALL TO ORDER. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. III. ROLL CALL. IV. APPROVAL OF JULY 25, 2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS ................................................... 1 • A. Appreciation plaque will be presented to Jim Wilke, Patriots Marching Band. ......................................................... 1 VI. COMMUNITY FORUM. Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. VII. CONSENT AGENDA ......................................................................... 2 - 15 These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. VIII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL ................................. 16 - 26 A. Resolution 00-058, re: Support of Northwest Youth and Family Services .................................................... 16 - 17 B. Ordinance 2000-003, re: Amend ordinance relating • to lot coverage and building to land ratio (3rd reading) ..... 18 - 21 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda July 11 , 2000 • Page 2 PAGE(S) C. Ordinance 2000-004, re: Juvenile curfew (3rd reading) ..... 22 - 26 IX. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF .................................... 27 - 83 A. Planning Commission Meeting - July 18, 2000 ................. 27 - 71 1 . Frontline Church; for 2654 Kenzie Terrace; zoning ordinance amendment (Resolution 00-059) ... 39 - 54 2. Hadi & Roger Abou-Mourad; for 3801 Stinson Boulevard; conditional use permit for a car wash at 3813 Stinson Boulevard (Resolution 00-060) ...... 55 - 71 B. Engineering Issues (Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, will be present). ............................................................ 72 - 84 1 . Sale of houses on Pahl Avenue (Resolution 00-063) . 72 - 74 • 2. House demolition and Pahl Avenue P and con- struction (Resolution 00-064) ................................ 75 - 80 3. Flood Relief Grant Program .......................................... 81 4. Silver Lake West Evaluation Report ........................ 82 - 84 X. PUBLIC HEARINGS ........................................................................ 85 - 125 A. Amendment to Tax Increment Financing District#3- Ramsey County (Resolution 00-061) ............................... 85 - 93 B. Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Area #3 and on the Proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District #5-Ramsey County (Resolution 00-062) ..................................................................... 94 - 125 XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS ... 126 - 127 XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. • XIII. ADJOURNMENT. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS AREA TTACHED. • V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS. • Appreciation plaque for Jim Wilke • i 6ilat hou i rcfrtt-� 04 f or outstanding community service is hereby awarded to JIM WI EKE PAT'R I OTS MARCHING BAND N Ulna,/` Al A.VO ky c T AIAN JcL2y 25 , 2000 D.-ITF. VII. CONSENT AGENDA. • Regular Council Meeting Minutes - July 11 , 2000 • Licenses/Permits • Verified Claims • • 1 - CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 3 JULY 11, 2000 4 7:00 p.m. 5 I. CALL TO ORDER. 6 Mayor Cavanaugh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 8 Mayor Cavanaugh invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 9 III. ROLL CALL. 10 Councilmembers present: Mayor Cavanaugh; Councilmembers Sparks, Horst and Hodson 11 Councilmembers absent: Councilmember Thuesen 12 Also present: City Manager Michael Morrison; City Attorney William Soth. 13 IV. APPROVAL OF JULY 11,2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. 14 Motion by Hodson to approve the July 11, 2000 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda as 15 presented. 16 Motion carried unanimously. •17 V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS. 18 VI. COMMUNITY FORUM. 19 Cavanaugh called for input from the audience and hearing none, moved forward with the agenda. 20 VII. CONSENT AGENDA. 21 Motion by Sparks to approve the Consent Agenda which consisted of: 22 1. Regular Council Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2000; 23 2. Licenses and Permits; 24 3. Claims. 25 Motion carried unanimously. 26 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 27 None. 28 IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. 29 A. Resolution 00-057 re: Authorizing BRW, Inc.to Prepare Final Design for Improvements 30 to Central Park 31 Cavanaugh requested background information from City Manager Michael Morrison. �32 Mornson reported much of the work has been completed for Task I on Central Park and that 33 $8,500 is needed to complete Task II of the Master Plan. He noted after Task II was completed City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 11, 2000 • Page 2 1 the Council would be addressed for construction of the park. 2 3 Horst asked what the funding would cover. Morrison stated this would cover the Task II Central 4 Park plan and give the Council an idea of how Central Park would be designed. He noted there 5 was still some uncertainty with the future financing and construction of the park at this time. 6 Horst asked if the Council would be addressed for the final plan or if the Park Commission 7 would be in charge of this item. Sparks noted this was only the beginning of the process and that 8 the Council would have numerous opportunities for input. She indicated the Park Commission 9 would like to display the park plan at Village Fest for the community to review. Hodson stated 10 he would be in favor of having the community review this plan to gain additional suggestions. 11 Cavanaugh reiterated that at the joint meeting of Council and Park Commission the Park 12 Commission was asked-to draw some closure on a plan and bring it to the Council. He explained 13 they were working on this plan and then Council would be responsible for funding before the 14 park were to go through. 15 Motion by Sparks to approve Resolution 00-057, a Resolution Authorizing BRW, Inc. to Prepare •16 Final Design for Improvements to Central Park. 17 Motion carried unanimously. 18 B. Ordinance 2000-003, re: Amend Ordinance Relating to Lot Coverage and Building to 19 Land Ratio (2nd Reading) 20 Cavanaugh noted this was the second reading of this Ordinance. 21 Motion by Sparks to approve the second reading of Ordinance 2000-003, an Ordinance Relating 22 to Lot Coverage and Building to Land Ratio, Amending Sections 1605 Subd. 44(a) and 1615.05., 23 Subd. 8 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances. 24 Motion carried unanimously. 25 C. Ordinance 2000-004 re: Curfews (2nd Reading). 26 Cavanaugh explained that this proposed Ordinance is simply a rewrite and update of the City's 27 existing curfew ordinance. This rewrite is being done in order to bring the City's curfew 28 ordinance into compliance with the Hennepin County Ordinance. Cavanaugh further explained 29 that a local resident brought the discrepancies between the two ordinances to the Council's 30 attention. 31 For the benefit of the audience, Sparks reviewed the essential elements of the Ordinance and •32 noted this was a second reading: City Council Regular Meetirig Minutes July 11, 2000 tPage 3 1 * Juveniles under 12 years of age have to be home weekdays by 9:00 p.m., and Friday and 2 Saturday,home by 10:00 p.m. 3 4 * Juveniles ages 12-14 have to be home 10:00 p.m. on weekdays, and home by 11:00 p.m. 5 on Friday and Saturday. 6 * Juveniles ages 15-17 have to be home by 11:00 p.m. on weekdays and home by midnight 7 on Friday and Saturday. 8 Motion by Hodson to approve the second reading of Ordinance 2000-004, an Ordinance Relating 9 to Juvenile Curfew, Amending Section 1105 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances. 10 Motion carried unanimously. 11 X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF. 12 .A. Scott Tankenoff—Hillcrest Development-Apache Plaza Redevelopment 13 Scott Tankenoff spoke regarding the Apache Plaza redevelopment. He noted his company was 14 ,trying to receive TIF funding as well as scheduling a review committee for his project. He noted •15 he is looking for preliminary approval at the August 8, 2000 Council meeting. He noted his 16 company is under a time constraint with limited resources. He noted his company is willing to 17 answer any questions or concerns so this project is able to move through the City approval 18 process. 19 Horst stated concern for the broad definition for the parameters as to what can be placed within 20 the Plaza. He asked what kind of latitude would be needed where the City could still be 21 protected. Horst indicated he feels the parameters needs to be greater defined before the City 22 moves forward on this issue and what the limits would be. He noted the City is willing to work 23 with Hillcrest to make this redevelopment work. 24 Mr. Tankenoff stated this has been kept in mind and that the $70 per foot range is what Hillcrest 25 Development is wanting to do. He noted the ownership in place has no back up plan at this time 26 and that Hillcrest wants to make the redevelopment successful. 27 Mr. Tankenoff explained if clients were not attracted to the new design, the minimum would be 28 provided but that Hillcrest will not take the position of operating losses. He noted a parameter of 29 uses would be something that would make the City proud to keep this site in use. Mr. Tankenoff 30 stated ideally the space should be used for office/commercial space. • City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 11, 2000 Page 4 1 Mr. Tankenoff noted if his company is not able to meet the high parameter, which his company 2 has always done, he does have to.have a back up plan for development of the site. He stated he is 3 being up front with the City on the future development if the high parameters are not met. Mr. 4 Tankenoff noted his company would do poorly if the site does not gain the higher parameters. 5 Cavanaugh noted there was a development meeting last week and out of this meeting came an 6 agreement to perfect the development plan and make a recommendation to the Planning 7 Commission. He explained the level of certainty of the project has been greatly discussed and 8 defined by this committee. Cavanaugh stated that because this is a one shot thing the Council 9 needs to discuss this project and define it to their needs. He indicated the fall back plan leaves 10 the City with less certainty on the redevelopment. He noted the certainty has to be known and 11 how the TIF money will be used before this comes before the Council for approval. 12 13 Horst stated he is not looking for certainty but expectation because the tenant mix cannot be 14 absolutely known at this time. He noted Mr. Tankenoff will perform to the best of his ability to 15 be profitable and that the Development Committee is going to have to tie up loose ends for the 16 City. 17 •18 Mr. Tankenoff noted the issues of certainty at this time as being that the storm water would be 19 worked on, there would be new fascia based on whom is attracted to the building,the size of 20 windows, the landscaping, and a new signage. He indicated the items of uncertainty are whom 21 will.occupy, who much they will occupy and when they will occupy. 22 Mr. Tankenoff noted these factors will drive him to meet the needs of potential tenants. He 23 explained that once the City designs the rules, it will still be difficult for him to meet only office 24 and hi-tech office without offering commercial uses. Mr. Tankenoff indicated the City needs to 25 decide what uses they are comfortable with and which uses the City is not comfortable with. 26 Horst stated he would not like to see warehouse or storage at this site. 27 28 Hodson stated he sees the TIF money as a goal for Hillcrest to meet the best interests of the 29 community and for them self. He noted he is glad that they have a contingency plan for this use. 30 Cavanaugh noted this plan may not be in the best interests of the Village because it would not be 31 at the highest and best level of development. He indicated the contingency plan will list the uses 32 permitted within the Plaza that the community finds are the best and highest uses for the site. 33 34 Horst stated there is never going to be complete certainty on this issue. Cavanaugh stated there • City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 11, 2000 Page 5 1 would not be complete certainty but that the uses would have to be acceptable within the City. 2 Hodson stated he would be interested in offering light-industrial if it brought in high paying jobs 3 into the community, which the Council needs to consider. 4 5 Mr. Tankenoff indicated this issue will be greater defined at the development committee meeting 6 on July 22, 2000. He noted they are looking for compatibility with the community and Hillcrest, 7 and define the uses. Mr. Tankenoff noted 95%of the space would be simple to fill but that there 8 may be 5% that would need special consideration. 9 10 Cavanaugh asked how long a temporary fix could be placed at the site if the site were not filled 11 immediately. He indicated this would need to be covered within the development agreement. 12 Cavanaugh stated at the next developers committee meeting he would like to see all issues 13 discussed before hand to allow for closure with the developers agreement. He indicated the 14 parties involved need to be productive for the time between now and the next meeting. 15 16 Horst stated he would like to see the redevelopment completed and doesn't want the City to be 17 getting in the way of itself. He asked how Hillcrest was doing with Saks. Mr. Tankenoff noted •1.8 Saks was willing to talk with Hillcrest and responded to.a correspondence. He indicated he is 19 having difficulty reaching them and noted they may have trouble getting a kiosks within the mall 20 with Herberger's present. 21 Mr. Tankenoff noted he is having a difficult time dealing with Herberger's to discuss their future 22 at the Plaza. He stated he is still working on this at this time, and hopes they come to grips with 23 the fact people shop at their store in Apache Plaza and at Rosedale Shopping Center. 24 25 B. Update on St. Anthony Shopping Center-Dick Krier 26 Mornson explained Dick Krier was present to review the Village Green Project due to the fact 27 there was new TIF laws and new Councilmembers to review this plan and make 28 recommendations. 29 30 Dick Krier reviewed there were four parts to this redevelopment being, 1)Village Green, 2)the 31 Bowling alley, 3)the hitching post; and, 4) the shopping center. He noted Hennepin County was 32 willing to grant the City right-of-way but would not be granting any funding to the City. Mr. 33 Krier stated a design team could be hired only if the Council was ready to move forward with 34 this issue. 35 36 Mornson noted an 8,000 square foot green space easement was gained from Dairy Queen along • City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 11, 2000 • Page 6 1 with a 26,000 square foot easement from th e Hitching Post. He indicated the City would get 2 money back if future development is not completed on the Hitching Post site. 3 4 Krier reviewed all the potential right-of-way easements near the proposed site. Morrison noted 5 the renovations would be roughly $1,200,000. He stated the project could be terminated prior to 6 improvements but that the Hitching Post is looking for improvements on their green space before 7 time has expired on the agreement. 8 9 Cavanaugh noted this would be a commitment the City needs to meet since an agreement was 10 reached with them on January 1, 2000 as this site is moving away from the redevelopment. The 11 Council concurred. 12 Cavanaugh stated the site is degenerating due to lack of care. Horst noted the Council could take 13 time to discuss this with the landlord as to the maintenance around the center. He stated he 14 would like the Hitching Post site completed. 15 16 Horst asked if any grants were available for this project. Mr. Krier stated he has explored grants 17 from the County, DNR and BRW and that none have fit to date. Cavanaugh indicated he would 1018 like preliminary numbers for the Hitching Post development for the green space renovation. 19 20 Sparks stated she would like additional background information on this issue. Mr. Krier 21 indicated the purpose of this project was to provide for a green space corridor within this 22 commercial project. He indicated at the Hitching Post site,the City would be responsible for 23 providing a pathway,trees and grass after removing the existing parking lot. 24 25 Mornson stated this site would make the neighboring properties more appealing. He noted he 26 would speak with the City Attorney to gain what obligations the City is under with the Hitching 27 Post, gain minimal bids for the site work at the Hitching Post and report back to the Council at a 28 future meeting. 29 B. City Manager. 30 1. City Manager Morrison reported the building inventory by SEH, Inc. and staff is currently 31 underway. He noted a report would be ready by mid-October. 32 2. Mr. Todd Hubmer, WSB and the City Manager would be selecting an appraising firm, 33 probably Evergreen Land Consultants, to start the negotiations for the easements for 34 Harding holding pond. • City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 11, 2000 • Page 7 1 3. The Mayor and the City Manager met with School representatives and Springsted, Inc. to 2 explore funding:options for Central Park. The options will be presented to the Council on 3 July 25, 2000. On July 27, 2000 there will be a third meeting with Superintendent and 4 the School Board Chair. A joint meeting with the School to discuss, and possibly agree 5 on a funding plan,will be in August or September. 6 4. Home removal/demolishing bids for Pahl and 301 will be on July 25, 2000 as well as 7 landscaping plans for the Pahl lots. 8 5. The Silver Lake evaluation would be provided by Todd Hubmer through an executive 9 summary. 10 6. The Hillcrest PUD process change was noted as follows: 11 August 1 Planning Commission Special Meeting 12 August 8 Council Review Preliminary Plat 13 August 22 Approval of TIF, Final Development Plan, 14 Business Subsidy Agreement �5 7. The Proposed 2001 City Budget is to be completed by Monday, July 17, 2000. 16 8. It was noted National Night Out is August 1, 2000. A Block List would be handed out at 17 the next meeting. There would be 12 to 15 block parties within the Community and the 18 Council would need to divide the list of parties to assure representation at all parties. 19 XI. REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS. 20 Hodson noted the St. Anthony/Spring Lake Park Marching Band took grand champion in a 21 festival in Colorado. He explained the marching band is doing a wonderful job this summer and 22 that the director would be retiring after this year. 23 Horst indicated on June 25, 2000 he attended a meeting at the Met Council regarding sewer 24 connections. He noted Met Council implied the rates would be raised for all communities in the 25 near future. ' 26 Sparks noted she attended the Parks Commission meeting last night and will have a plan for 27 Central Park before the Council in September but would be at the Village Fest as well. She 28 indicated the Park Commission is interested in pleasing all members of the community. Sparks 29 indicated the skate park is staked out at this time and the plans are in but not final. • City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 11, 2000 ® Page 8 1 Cavanaugh indicated the fire department gave a large escort to the marching band after their 2 return from Colorado. He explained volunteers are still needed for Village Fest. .Cavanaugh 3 added that a group is looking for interest in concerts in the parks and will be holding a meeting 4 on Monday at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. 5' -X111. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 6 None. 7 8 XIII. ADJOURNMENT. 9 Motion by Hodson to adjourn the meeting at 8:19 p.m. 10 Respectfully submitted, 11 Heidi Guenther 12 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. •13 14 Mayor 15 ATTEST: 16 City Clerk 10 Saint Anthony Village DATE: July 25, 2000 Approval: TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval: Heating Contractor License: Dependable Indoor Air Quality, Inc., Coon Rapids, MN Reliant Energy Minnegasco, Anoka, MN P.R.S. Mechanical, Inc., St. Anthony, MN • General Contractors License: Hage Construction Company, St. Louis Park, MN Superior Paving, Rogers, MN 11 Saint Anthony Village DATE: .. July 25; 2000. Approved: TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval: Temporary 3.2 Beer and Wine Permit: Church of St. Charles Borromeo/Fall Cookout/ September 16, 2000 • 12 - C--FINANCIAL--SYSTf]M --'___-__-_---___--SI°-ANTHONY VILLAG /18/2000 15: Check Register GL540R-V06.27 PAGE BANK'-_--__--_\/E]Nl}{}R-------_-__------'---_______-__- CHECK#�. _I)ATE_ -_ AMOUNT LIQR LIQUOR CHECKZNG ACCOUNT ' ` '---- `_---- - - ' __ U08�I1 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRZ` 17051 07/26/OO 47 . 85 004225 ALLIANT FOODSERVICE 17052 07/26/00 1 ,826.65 ' - -' DO4O1z ALLIED--PAPER- CO. .--- '_-17{)53_07/26/00 - - 36 ^61 0 0 4293 BELLBOY CORP. 17054 07/26/00 2, 672.28 004080 CHZSAGO LAKES DIST. CO. , 17055 07/26/00 5,543. 95 <}04O87- _ _.170_56__C)_7./26_/0'0 _ 468.00 _ 004095 COCA COLA BOTTLING 17057 07/26/08 17732.25 004107 COMPTON 'S COMMERCIAL CLN 17058 07/26/00 2, 445. 95 - OO41O6 CREATIVE-MARKETING ' 170`9 07/2c"3/00 159 . 5O 008557 DAILEY DATA & ASSOCIATES 17060 07/26/00 1 , 257.55 008437 DIRECTV 17061 07/26/00 37 .36 _OO412O EAGLE-WINE CO 1.7062'_D7/26/.00 _ - 3' 127^ 16 � DO4125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 17063 07/26/00 48,068 ; 81 008563 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASS 17064 07/26/00 85.00 004142 FOCUS' 17O65'O7/26/OO 397 ^ 95 OO8647 FRATTALLONE 'S HARDWARE 17O66 O7/26/OO 14.53 004141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC . 17067 07/26/00 5,336 . 17 OO1O3O G & K SERVICES 17O6B O7/26/OO 1O1 . 87 � � �_���� �� � � � � � 004172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC . 17069 07/26/0 0 699 . 00 004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC . 1 7070 O7/26/OO 7, O87. 14 OO42O1 HEGGIESPI7ZA 17O71 O7/26/nO 146 . 2O - ' ' -'- - ------ - - -- - ' - 0 0 420 7 HOHENSTEIN 'S , INC 17O72 07/26/00 8,956 . 75 OO8252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 17O73 O7/26/OO 35 . 24 008547 INTERNATIONAL CIGARS, IN 17O74 O7/26/OO 68O. 83 OO422O JOHNSON' Bi ]S.- -3Q. - - 17O75 'O7/26/OO 40,O52 . 53 004218 JOHNSON PAPER & SUPPLY C 17076 0 7/26/0 0 426 . 49 00 1"230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 17O77 O7/26/OO 44,789 . 49 _ _ 002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 17078 07/26/00 200.00 OO4265 MARK VII SALES INC 17079 0 7/26/0 0 30 7 007 . 94 OO4266 MARKET MECHANICAL 17O8O 07/26/00 945.00 � � 004271 MEDIA ONE 170 81 07/26/0 0 154 . 21 008671 MENGELKOCH CO. 17082 07/26/00 12.00 OO4272 METZ NG CO 17083 07/26/00 119.77 004312 MINNCOMM ' 17084 07/26/00 490. 75 007120 MINNESOTA UC FUND ' 17085 07/26/00 ^ 64 .10 004299 MPLS. OXYGEN CO. 70 07/26/00 9.29 � ` � 004334 NORTHEASTER 17087 07/26/00 930 . 60 002680 NORTHERN STATES POWER 1708B 07/26/00 4,873.61 OO4339 NTN COMMUNICATIONS INC 17O89 O7/26/OO 679.00 000045 OFFICE DEPOT 17090 07/26/00 40.81 004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 17091 07/26/00 99. 12 004354 PAUSTIS & SONS 17O92 O7/26/OO 2, 784.O5 ��_�_�������_�_��__�� . - OO4355 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 17O93 O7/26/OO 232 .35 004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 17094 07/26/00 21 , 147.96 004376 PRIOR WINE CO 17O95 07 2,455. 65 - ---- OO4385 QUALITY WINE CO 17096 07/26/00 13,345.24 008597 R.D. HANSON ASSOC . , INC . 17097 07/26/00 115.75 00238O RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASC 17098 07/26/00 366.87 ' _--_----'--- _-_ 13 FINANCIAL SYSTEM _ _ --- ----------.._....-------.-----.ST.. _ .ANTI-IOt.i`r - VIL.I_.AG /18/2000 15: Check: Register GL540R--V06.27 PAGE BANK VENDOR DATE AMOUNT LIAR LIQUOR. CHECKING. ACCOUNT 004393 RON'S ICE 17099 07/26%00 2,027 .89 004466 SYSCO-MINNESOTA 17100 07/26/00 1 , l,-24.58 __-C. 044.65_-_--TOTAL_ REGISTER SYSTEMS 1.7-101 07/26/00 46 .85 008670 TWIN CITIES BLUES NEWS 17102 07/26/00 65.00 004480 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE 17103 07/26/00 113 .86 004492 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1.7104 ")7/26/00 7'5.01; 008219 US WEST DE=X' 17105 07/26/00 627 . 40 004490 VAL-PAK OF MINNESOTA 17106 07/26/00 1 ,500.00 .0000.1-- -- ,V_IC.K/B�Jka.------ - - _. _ 1.71.07._C?7./c. -.� � . 386. 00 004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 17108 07/26/00 327.A.3; 008316 WINE COMPANY/THE 17109 07/26/00 535 .71 0_{x,3:310 ------ WINE MERCHANTS INC - ------.----171,10 07/26/00 574.36 - - - 003840 ZEP MFG COMPANY 17111 07/26/00 210°96 LIQUOR C;FIECKInIG ACCOIJhIT 2637882.26 #x.. 14 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLA -__�7719-!2000-ice: Check e g s i e r GL54C R-V06.27 PAGE BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING - 082 16 A _ OIOE 2077 26/00 11.41 008666 ALLEGRO 12245 07/26/00 36.67 008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 12246 07/26/00 764.00 -- 0082b8�l�ERTCAI�PAYME`�fT�;E�TE�f 12247 Q7�26/00 18.9@ - 005028 AMERICAN SEMI-PARTS INC 12248 07/26/00 12. 18 000115 AMES PHOTO FINISH 12249 07/26/00 14.42 0086b� ASPEhT EN�T�R011M 12250 07%26/OC) 008678 BARBAROSSA & SONS, INC. 12251 07/26/00 70,807.30 008505 BATTERY CITY INC . 12252 07/26/00 275.32 .0000 E�O�IDWAI�PIZ�A 12253 07/26/00 102.93 008153 BOB 'S PERSONAL COFFEE SE 12254 07/26/00 72 .97 000610 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANS SVC 12255 07/26/00 40.79 - 008500 -CHER-ORE 1225c_07/26-/0U .00007 COUSINS 12257 07/26/00 190.92 -- 007178 D-ROCK CENTER & SMALL EN 12258 07/26/00 13.05 004Fi-I DATA c-TELL-URMUKII-C-T'f0 _1_2_25_19_0_77Z6/_00______ 162.50 008429 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF 12260 07/26/00 510. 00 005193 DEPT LABOR & INDUST CED 12261 07/26/00 40.00 -- -000-807-----DIAMOIqD-VQGEI-P-ATll - 008007 DICTAPHONE 12263 07/26/00 144.00 000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY 12264 07/26/00 1 ,842.52 --__005r22 I)RUSOT 7DO_NAED_ 12265217726/00 -"-1__,_2 5-0_._0 0 --.00001 EAGLE ENGRAVING 12266 07/26/00 70.65 000200 EARL ANDERSON ASSOC 12267 07/26/00 1 ,023.08 --- 0'08284--E=CTTON-SVSTEKS SOFT i_2268 07726700_____---2;-130.-56 008513 ELE.C:TRIC PUMP WALDOR GRO 12269 07/26/00 1 , 154.50 008265 FIRSTAR CORPORATE TRUST 12270 07/26/00 70,746.88 008221_­- ;WENITZELt-HEDIFAC-K,--- 1.-2271-07/26700- - --3�000.00 - 008647 FRATTALLONE 'S HARDWARE 12272 07/26/00 128 . 15 " 001025 G & K SERVICES 12273 07/26/00 162.84 00-rO30-----g-&--F-SERVTCES -------122T --077-26TOO---------- "--384-58 - 001145 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD 12275 07/26/00 65.97 - 001230 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 12276 07/26/00 115.20 0085-67 GREENER-FA-STURES 1-2277-07722-6100 _.247.-4-ti--- -- 001420 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 12278 07/26/00 504.93 .00002 HCMC EMS EDUCATION 12279 07/26/00, 36.00 008376- HENNEPIN-CNTY-SHERIFF? 122 //eb 'CT----200-.8E3-__ 005017 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE 12281 07/26/00 _ 603.47 008365 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE 12282 07/26/00 29.52 00-1"580 HYD"R-ATJ=C-SPECTALTTV-C 12283 OT726700-""-- ---78 76----- 008658 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, I 12284 07/26/00 63.00 007510 JEDL.ICKI , INC . /F.F. 12285 07/26/00 11800.00 -OGO-03 KIN-C�TSTRl UT 28�07726�0 47-73 -- 000742 KROEPLIN/CONNIE 12287 07/26/00 36.21 002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 12288 07/26/00 119.45 CT8255 CCTC: INC 26 25.50 25.50 002395 M T I DIST CO 12290 07/26/00 43.75 - 008228 MACH MEDICAL INC . 12291 07/26/00 185.25 15 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. - ANTHONY. VIL_ L T-077 9/�b(SO 1 Check Register GL540R-V06.27 PAGE BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT - FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING 0 C)21-60- AFtSACO�C.RE E PROD . 12292 07/26/00 2,04 .34-- - 008197 MCI WORLDCOM 12293 07/26/00 97.88 004271 MEDIA ONE 12294 07/26/00 3.50 008279 ETR0�O�CIL E VIR SERV 12295 07/26/00 1 ,089.00 008245 METRO FIRE 12296 07/26/00 106.32 007835 METROCALL 12297 07/26/00 25.62 -- 0087+6,7 hTY-D-GJA�FZ]RD 12298 077-26/00 319.48 002280 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP 12299 07/26/00 39.46 -- 008280 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURE 12300 07/26/00 687 .98 .00004 MOE+ILE PHONE COMPANY 12301 07%2600 201 .01 007076 MOODY 'S INVESTORS SERVIC 12302 07/26/00 3,250.00 008430 MPLS DEPT OF HEALTH-FAMI 1.2303 07/26/00 46.40 .O.00SOICC-FiETII�G-S�R�I�ES 12304 07/26/00 555.00 002'600 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL C 12305 07/26/00 760.00 002680 NORTHERN STATES POWER 12306 07/26/00 13,394.94 -0-0-7:5-f7--- hfORTHEF2N WATER WORKS SUP 12307 07%26/00 50.86 - 000045 OFFICE DEPOT 12308 07/26/00 1 ,331 .46 - 008640 OSELL 'S CUSTOM FRAMES 1.2309 07/26/00 12.67 608-523 P4CF--ANALL TI-C.AE-8-5-RV-I-C-ES 1231C) 07%26/OC) 285.00 - 008594 PETERBILT NORTH 12311 07/26/00 7.20 007057 PRAXAIR 12312 07/26/00 88.40 008463--R--D-Pi Vl' S-PAOT(J` iA-l:s 23-13 07/26/00 ---- ---- -72.42 - - 008462 RAMSEY COUNTY 12314 07/26/00 6,013.47 008571 RAMSEY COUNTY ATTORNEY 'S 1.231.5 07/26/00 171 .40 -' ---"--- --002380 RF_LIANT-ENERGY-MINNE�ASC 123f6-0-772-67/00------------2,339.64 003065 ROAD RESCUE INC 12317 07/26/00 10.65 - 005293 ROAD RUNNER 12318 07/26/00 21 .47 - --- ---008653----"--ROSEVIl=LE-FIRE-G*RUUN ].2319 C)7%26�00 15.00 - 005270 ROSEVILLE RADIO 12320 07/26/00 35.48 .00006 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MN 12321 07/26/00 278.00 -- 0-03350- SEF--IBC 12322 07726100--------2,435.98 - 003315 SERCO LABORATORIES 12323 07/26/00 180.00 -- 008199 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS, INC . 12324 07/26/00 535.28 .00-Go5 STATE-TRE�-T5ORER'OF 1 325-07726-100 ----85-70- - 003490 STREICHF_R 'S 12326 07/26/00 439. 15 008679 SURFACE/MIKE 12327 07/26/00 110.00 - TA-SC FiLF SRY�-50N 328�772�10 C _102-i - 0032-60 -- 007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 12329 07/26/00 379.38 003560 TRACY PRINTING 12330 07/26/00 118.50 O044e-1 TWIN-CITY TF41\1ITOR�-SOFP i R33-1-07-726T00-- ----l-97-.82-- 008372 U S WEST INTERACT SERVIC 12332 07/26/00 56.61 008010 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 12333 07/26/00 515.75 - -9027007-Utj WEb I UNTC"ATI.O 1;--334-07T2-67-00 5'72.35- - 008227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEV 12335 07/26/00 735.74 004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 12336 07/26/00 260.77 000830--ZEE-MEUIC USER 12337-0T12&f(T0 59.98- - FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING 200,898.50 VIII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. • Resolution 00-058 • Ordinance 2000-003 (3`d reading) • Ordinance 2000-004 (3`d reading) Northwest Youth 16 *�J�' & Family Services 3490 Lexington Avenue North, Suite 205 • Shoreview, MN 55126 • Phone (651) 486-3808 • Fax (651) 486-3858 June 21, 2000 Michael Morrison, City Manager City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418 Dear Mr. Morrison: I am contacting-you on behalf of the Board of Directors of Northwest Youth and Family Services, regarding funding for our Ramsey County Corrections Contract which enables us to provide diversion services to juvenile offenders from your community.. We have recently learned that the County Manager, Paul Kirkwold is proposing a 50 percent cut to these funds in his 2001 budget. We presently.receive $43,455 through this contract. Such a reduction would seriously impact our ability to provide diversion services to your youtk.unless alternative funding--is found. • At its meeting on June 15, 2000, NYFS' board passed a resolution similar to that attached .which is being-sent to the county manager and all county,commissioners. We are asking you to present this matter to your council with the hope that they will adopt the attached resolution. The full budget will be presented to the commissioners near the end of July, so acting on this in a timely manner i.s critical. I have attached the 1999 year-end statistics on the number of young-people served by this agency. You may want to note the specific numbers of young people served through the diversion services. We are all aware that early intervention with juvenile offenders is extremely.cost effective and produces positive results in decreasing future delinquent involvement. I have also enclosed an article that speaks of the importance of diversion services. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. If there is additional assistance that I can give your please feel free to call me. Our continuingpartnership . serving kids and their families in your community is high on both of our agendas. Sincerely,. Kay Z. Andrews, LICSW F,XP.Cj itimR Direeto _ 17 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY SOLUTION 00-058 A RESOLUTION REGARDING RAMSEY COUNTY CORRECTIONS CONTRACT WHEREAS, Northwest Youth and Family services has been providing Diversion Services to juvenile offenders for the past 25 years; and WHEREAS, these services have consistently been provided in a cost effective, community- based model involving collaboration with local law enforcement departments, the Ramsey County Corrections Department and the Ramsey County Attorney's Office; and WHEREAS, the recidivism rate for young persons served through this program is consistently around 16 percent; and WHEREAS, 329 young people and their families were served by this program in 1999 and 360 young people and their families were served in 1998; and WHEREAS, local municipality monies are provided to supplement the cost of these services; • and WHEREAS, a Youth Intervention Program Grant is received from the State to additionally fund these services; and WHEREAS, we wish to continue to have these issues addressed in a timely manner with emphasis on early intervention with a community-based setting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby strongly encourages the Ramsey County Manager and the Ramsey County Board to provide funding at the same level in 2001 as in 2000, the Diversion Services provided through Northwest Youth and Family Services. Adopted this day of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • Reviewed by Administration: City Manager MEMORANDUM 1� • DATE: 6/9/00 MEETING DATE: 6/20/00 TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: City Manager Mornson FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom RE: Public Hearing. An Ordinance amendment relating to lot coverage and building to land ratio, amending sections 1605, Subd. 44(a) and 1615.05, Subd. 8 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances. This item was brought before Council on 5/9/00 for action. No action was taken. Mayor Cavanaugh directed City Manager Mornson to fast return the Lot Coverage.Amendment to the Planning Commission for approval. If the Commission approves the Ordinance,then it will be returned to the Council on June 27. Staff Recommendation:Motion to approve Ordinance 2000-003. Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin • 19 To: St. Anthony City Council From: St. Anthony Planning.Commission Re: Recommendation to change lot coverage ordinance. Background In the fall of 1999, the Planning Commission heard two very similar variance requests in consecutive months. They were both requests for variances of the lot coverage maximum. Both were undersized lots in area-and width: 'Both had garages located in the back yard with the driveway running from the street in front (i.e., no alley). ..Both were above the maximum 35% lot coverage limit with 20-25% of the coverage made up of the driveway and garage. Both listed the non conforming lot size and width as the hardship in their variance request. There.are 439 lots under the current 9000 square foot minimum, about 25% of the city. We suspect that most, if not all, of these lots are already above the 35% limit and many will be seeking variances as people seek to enlarge theirRarages or improve their homes. Rather than looking at the requests on a case by case basis,.the Planning Commission wants to set criteria that can'be applied consistently, allowing. improvement of the homes in St. Anthony withputadver5-ely affecting_the-storm.water -control efforts. The go,�j of tl q ordinance change is to reduce the number of yariance requests to only thoskthat_rpresent extraordinary circumstances. Recommendation We recommend that-the Ipt coverage ordinance be charged as follows: 1. Change Section 16Q5,;,ubd. 44(a) Lot Cov�ge to clarify the definition-of "impervious surface" W ex e d -as long as the surface below the dark is ..not fmpeMous. Lot Coverage. The area of a lot covered by impervious surface. An impervious surface is any material that substantially reduces or prevents the infiltration of storm_ water.into- previously.undeveloped land. Impervious surface'shali laclude all.b0.1dings, driveways (paved or.gravel),'sidewalksand-parkiir�as. A surface*that.has . _ been compacted or covered with a iayer of.material so that it.is highly resistant to.infiltration by water will be*considered impervious. Impervious surface shall not include decks as-_long as the surface beneath the deck is'not impervious. Note: The-definifion d.a deck-should a1so:_4e:changed to ensure that the deck itself is-notimpervious. 2. Change Section 1615.05, Subd. 8 to create a two tier system for lot coverage limits. Lots with area 9000 square feet or over would retain the 35% limit. Lots with area less than 9000 square feet would have an increased limit of 40%. 3. Add a storm water retention plan to the building permit application. The 20 applicant must submit a short paragraph outlining what steps are being taken in connection with the project to retain storm water on the property. An educational brochure would accompany the application to give people ideas of what can be done. The intent is'to create education and incentives for.people to take these steps rather than requirements and.enforcements. Rationale ExcludbcL Decks Under current interpretation, decks.are counted in determining lot coverage because they are structures. This does not seem in line with the intent of the ordinance to limit storm water runoff since water can run through the spaces and permeate into the ground below. Two Tier Lot Coverage Limit We believe-the 35% lirnit.is not reasonable far lots-under the current minimum lot size of 90QO square feet. Todd Hubner of WSB reported to us.that increasing the lot coverage-limit for these lots w.Quld.not affect the storm water retention in St, Anthony. The two tier system would allow property owners to improve their property without. going.through the variance process, leaving variance requests for only extraordinary circumstances. The 35% limit for lots.of 9000 square feet-and above is in line with other communities and we.believe it provides adequate room for development in the majority of cases. Richfield has s similar two tier system. Water detention Plan We bQlieve most people would be willing to make simple changes to their building plans to help alleviate fit Anthony's storm water problem if they were given ideas and encouragement to do so. Examples include directing gutter down spouts into the yard rather thant dawn the driveways and sloping.par'king.'are.as taward.the yard.-rather than toward the street. If things like this were done on a city-wide basis, there is potential for a significant-favorable impact to the storm water control efforts. Attachment: Summary of other communities'.lot coverage requirements. 21 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ORDINANCE 2000-003 AN.ORDINANCE RELATING TO LOT COVERAGE AND BUILDING TO LAND RATIO, AMENDING SECTIONS 1605 SUBD. 44(a) AND 1615.05, SUBD. 8 OF THE 1993 ST. ANTHONY CODE OF ORDINANCES The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 1605.01, Subd. 44(a)is amended to read as follows: Lot Coverage and Building to Land Ratio. (a) Lot Coverage. The area of a lot covered by impervious surface. An impervious surface is any material that substantially reduces or prevents the infiltration of storm water into the ground. Impervious surfaces shall include all buildings; driveways (paved or gravel), sidewalks and parking areas. A surface that has been compacted or covered with a layer of material so that it is highly resistant to infiltration by water will be considered impervious. An impervious surface shall not include decks as long as the deck is pervious and the surface beneath the deck is pervious. • Section 2. Section 1615.05, Subd..8 is amended to read as follows Lot Coverage. The lot coverage for residential structures on lots with an area 9,000 square feet and above may not exceed 35%. The lot coverage for residential structures on lots with an area less than 9,000 square feet, may not exceed 40%. First Reading: June 27, 2000 Second Reading: July 11, 2000 Adopted: July 25, 2000 Mayor , ATTEST: City Clerk Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin • 22 • MEMO DATE: May 10, 2000 TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager FROM: Capt. John Ohl SUBJECT: Curfew Ordinance On December 20, 1994, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners adopted a Juvenile Curfew Ordinance. This particular curfew ordinance was amended on June 27, 1995, and has been static ever since. The Hennepin County Ordinance essentially indicated that: i • Juveniles under 12 YOA had to be home weekdays by 9:00 p.m., and Friday and Saturday, home by 10:00 p.m. i . • Juveniles ages 12 — 14 had to be home 10:00 p.m: on weekdays, and home by 11:00 • p.m..on Friday and Saturday. • Juveniles ages 15 — 17 had to be home by 11:00 p.m. on weekdays, and home by midnight on Friday and Saturday. The Hennepin County Ordinance was different from our curfew ordinance (1105.01 & .02) in essentially two ways. The St. Anthony Ordinance governed persons under 16 YOA, and set the curfew at 10:00 p.m. on any day of the week. Our ordinance did not restrict 16 and 17 year olds. Minnesota State Statute 145A.05, Subd. 7A allows for a County Board to adopt a county- wide curfew for unmarried persons under the age of 18. Minnesota State Statute 145A.05, Subd. 9 allows governing bodies of cities or towns to adopt ordinances related to public health, however, these ordinances must not conflict with or be less restrictive than ordinances adopted by the County Board within who's jurisdiction the city or town is located. This statute gives the County Board the right to supercede our curfew ordinance. Our department has been enforcing the Hennepin County Curfew Ordinance, however, our city curfew ordinance was never taken off the books. It has now been suggested that we formally adopt the Hennepin County Curfew Ordinance. The'Police Department • would be in favor of adopting the Hennepin County Ordinance, as we have already been enforcing the ordinance since 1994. 23 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ORDINANCE 2000-004 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO JUVENILE CURFEW, AMENDING SECTION 1105 OF THE 1993 ST. ANTHONY CODE OF ORDINANCES The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 1105 of the 1993 St. Anthony code of Ordinances is amended pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 145A.07, Subd. 7A, to read in its entirety as follows: SECTION 1105 - CURFEW 1105.01 Findings and Purpose. In recent years there has been a significant increase in juvenile victimization and crime. At the same time, the crimes committed by and against juveniles have become more violent. A significant percentage of juvenile crime occurs during curfew hours. Because of their lack of maturity and experience, juveniles are particularly susceptible to becoming victims of older perpetrators. The younger a person is, the more likely he or she is to be.a victim of crime. While parents have the primary responsibility to provide for the safety and welfare of juveniles, the City has a substantial interest in the safety and welfare of juveniles. • Moreover, the City has an interest in preventing juvenile crime, promoting parental supervision, and providing for the well being of the general public. A curfew will reduce juvenile victimization and crime and will advance public safety, health, and general welfare. 1105.02 Definitions. Subd. 1. Juvenile means a person under the age of 18. The term does not include persons who are married or have been legally emancipated. Subd. 2. Parent means birth parents, adoptive parents, and step-parents. Subd..3. Guardian means an adult appointed pursuant to Minn. Stat. 526.6155 or 525.6165 who has the powers and responsibilities of a parent as defined by Minn. Stat. 525.619. Subd. 4. Responsible adult means a person 18 years or older specifically authorized by law or by a parent or guardian to have custody and control of a juvenile. Subd. 5. Public place means any place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access and includes, but is not limited to, streets, highways, and the common areas of schools, hospitals, apartment houses, office buildings, transport facilities, and • shops. 24 Ordinance 2000-004 Page 2 Subd. 6. Emergency means a circumstance or combination of circumstances requiring immediate action to prevent property damage, serious bodily injury or loss of life. Subd. 7. Serious bodily injurX means bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes death, serious permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss of impairment of the function of any body part or organ. Subd. 8. Establishment means any privately-owned place of business to which the public is invited, including but not limited to any place of amusement, entertainment or refreshment. Subd. 9. Proprietor means any individual, firm, association, partnership, or corporation operating, managing, or conducting any establishment. The term includes the members or partners of an association or partnership and the officers of a corporation. 1105.03. Prohibited Acts. Subd. 1. It is unlawful for a juvenile under the age of 12 to be present in any public place or establishment within the City of St. Anthony: • a. any time between 9:00 m on an Sunday; Monday; Tuesday; Wednesday; or P Y Y Y Thursday; and 5:00 am of the following day. b. any time between 10:00 pm on any Friday or Saturday and 5:00 am on the following day. Subd. 2. It is unlawful for a juvenile, age 12, 13 or 14, to be present in any public place or establishment within the City of St. Anthony: a. any time between 10:00 pm on any Sunday; Monday; Tuesday; Wednesday;; or Thursday; and 5:00 am of the following day, b. any time between 11:00 pm on any Friday or Saturday and 5:00 am on the following day. Subd. 3. It is unlawful for a juvenile, age 15, 16 or 17, to be present in any public place or establishment within the City of St. Anthony: a. any time between 11:00 pm on any Sunday; Monday; Tuesday; Wednesday; or Thursday; and 5:00 am of the following day. b. any time between 12:01 am and 5:00 am on any Saturday or Sunday. 25 Ordinance 2000-004 Page 3 Subd. 4. It is unlawful for a parent or guardian of a juvenile knowingly, or through negligent supervision, to permit.the juvenile to be in any public place or establishment within the City during the hours prohibited in Subds. 1, 2, and 3 of this Section. Subd. 5. It is unlawful for a proprietor of an establishment within the City to knowingly permit a juvenile to remain in the establishment or on the establishment's property during the hours prohibited in Subds. 1, 2, and 3 of this Section. If the proprietor is not present at the time of the curfew violation, the responding officer shall leave written notice of the violation with an employee of the establishment. A copy of the written notice shall be served upon the establishment's proprietor personally or by certified mail. 1105.04. Defenses. Subd. 1. It is an affirmative defense for a juvenile to prove that: a. the juvenile was accompanied by his or her parent, guardian, or other responsible adult. b: the juvenile was engaged in a lawful employment activity or was going to or • returning home from his or her lace of employment. P c. the juvenile was involved in an emergency situation. d. the juvenile was going to, attending, or returning home from an official school, religious, or other recreational activity sponsored and/or supervised by a public entity or a civic organization. e. the juvenile was on an errand at the direction of a parent or guardian. f. the juvenile was exercising First Amendment rights protected by the United States Constitution or Article I of the Constitution of the State of-Minnesota. g. the juvenile was engaged in interstate travel. h. the juvenile was on the public right-of-way boulevard or sidewalk abutting the property containing the juvenile's residence or abutting the neighboring property, structure, or residence. Subd. 2. It is an affirmative defense for a proprietor of an establishment to prove that: • 26 Ordinance 2000-004 Page 4 a. the proprietor or employee reasonably and in good faith relied upon a juvenile's representations of proof of age. Proof of age may be established pursuant to Minn.Stat. 340.503, Subd. 6, or other verifiable means, including, but not limited to, school identification cards and birth certificates. b. the proprietor or employee promptly notified the responsible police agency that a juvenile was present on the premises of the establishment during curfew hours. 1105.05. Penal 1y. Subd. 1. Violation of Section 1105.03, Subds. 1, 2, or 3 will be prosecuted pursuant to Minn. Stat. 260.195 and will be subject to the penalties thereon. Subd. 2. Violation of Section 1105.03, Subds. 4 or 5 is a misdemeanor and will be subject to the penalty set forth in Minn. Stat. 609.03. Section 2. This ordinance will become effective as of the date of its publication. • First Reading: June 27, 2000 Second Reading: July 11, 2000 Adopted: July 25, 2000 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin • IX. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF • Planning Commission - July 18, 2000 • Resolution 00-059 (Frontline Church zoning amendment) • Resolution 00-060 (Fuel Mart Car Wash, 3813 Stinson, conditional use permit) • Engineering Issues. • Resolution 00-063 (sale'of houses on Pahl Avenue) • Resolution 00-064 (demolition and Pahl Avenue pond construction) • Flood Relief Grant Program • Silver Lake West evaluation report 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ("') 27 U- U 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES •3 JULY 18, 2000 4 CALL TO ORDERIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 5 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Chair 6 Bergstrom. 7 ROLL CALL. 8 Present: Chair Bergstrom; Commissioners Tillmann, Hanson, Thomas, 9 Melsha, Hatch, and Stille. 10 Commissioners absent: None. 11 Also present: Spencer Isom, Assistant City Manager 12 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE 13 FOLLOWING ITEMS: 14 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom noted that there were some additional items to the agenda 15 and those items would be distributed to the Commissioners later in the meeting. 16 I. PUBLIC INPUT. 17 Chair Bergstrom called for input from the audience on items that were not listed on the agenda, 18 and hearing none, moved forward with the agenda. 109 II. APPROVAL OF JUNE 20, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES. 20 Motion by Melsha, second by Tillmann, to approve the June 20, 2000 Planning Commission 21 Meeting Minutes with the following modifications: 22 Page 7, Line 2, add: "The proposal is subject to the changes intentionally made by the 23 Development Review Committee." 24 Motion carried unanimously. 25 III. COMMUNICATION FROM CITY COUNCIL. 26 None. 27 IV. REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENTS OR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATIONS. 28 1. Public Hearing. Hillcrest Development's Preliminary Development Plan for the Apache 29 Plaza. 30 Chair Bergstrom requested a report from Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom. Isom reported 31 that Hillcrest Development's preliminary development plan for the Apache Plaza includes a 32 rezoning from "C" district to a PUD. The applicant has requested the public hearing be 33 postponed until after a special meeting of the Planning Commission can be held. The 34 Commission at said special meeting would hear Hillcrest's Final Development Plan. The 35 Development Review Committee has asked that a special meeting be held on August 1, 2000 or 40 6 at such time thereafter as deemed appropriate by the Development Review Committee. 37 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Thomas,to approve the request by Hillcrest Development for 38 the postponement of the public hearing until after a Special Meeting of the Planning 39 Commission to be held on August 1, 2000. This motion also approves the Special Planning Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 28 July 18, 2000 Page 2 • 1 Commission meeting for August 1, 2000. 2 Motion carried unanimously. .. 3 V. NEW APPLICATIONS /PUBLIC HEARINGS. 4 1. Public Heariniz. Petition for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance (Frontline Church. 5 Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m., and requested a report from Staff. 6 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom reported that Pastor Bill Arrigoni, representing the 7 Frontline Church and Outreach Center, is asking the City to consider adding a Church as a 8 conditional use in a commercial district. Presently, Churches are a permitted conditional use in 9 all R1, R2, R3, and R4 districts citywide. If this petition were approved, then Churches would 10 also be a permitted conditional use in "C" districts citywide. 11 Mr. Isom continued by stating that the Frontline Church has entered into a purchase agreement 12 for the property located at 2654 Kenzie Terrace in the City of St. Anthony. If the petition would 13 be approved, the Frontline Church would subsequently submit an Application for Conditional 14 Use. 15 Mr. Isom stated that the City has received a completed Petition for Amendment to Zoning 16 Ordinance. Staff recommends that the Commission either approve or deny the petition. If •7 approved, then Staff would prepare'the necessary Ordinance in preparation for the next City 18 Council meeting. 19 Chair Bergstrom introduced Pastor Bill Arrigoni and invited him to address the Commission. 20 Mr. Arrigoni noted that the Church is currently located at a different site, but would like to 21 relocate to St. Anthony and is interested in purchasing the building at 2654 Kenzie Terrace. This 22 process would allow for the Church to grow and to become a part of the community in St. 23 Anthony. Mr. Arrigoni stated that the.Church has much to offer the community and provides 24 ministry to all ages. The heart of the Church, Mr. Arrigoni stated, is to help people and become 25 a positive icon within the community. 26 Mr. Arrigoni said that he has been working with the architect and made sure that the Church 27 could offer the City an easement to allow for a walking path that would coincide with the City's. 28 plans for green space. This was incorporated into the plans after the Concept Review with the 29 Planning Commission in June 2000. Mr. Arrigoni noted that the walking path would be four feet 30 wide. Additionally,the parking would be skirted around to the rear of the building to allow for 31 better traffic flow. 32 Chair Bergstrom invited input from the audience, and hearing none, closed the Public Hearing at 33 7:23 p.m. Bergstrom requested comments from the Commissioners. 4 Bergstrom stated that he has reservations about any noncommercial use in that district. Melsha 5 stated that this is an issue that does not have anything to do with the Frontline Church, but is 36 more of a public policy issue. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 29 July 18, 2000 Page 3 • 1 Stille noted that it is painful to deny the request, but stated that he would like to clarify that the 2 City has a specific policy and although the Church would be an excellent addition to the 3 community, allowing a noncommercial use would change the City's policy and have an affect on 4 similar future issues. 5 Tillmann echoed Stille's comments and stated that to change the City's policy would not be 6 acceptable. 7 Thomas noted that if the Commission allowed this use, they would be opening up the policy 8 citywide. In other words, the issue could present future problems if the policy was changed. 9 However, he would encourage the Church to continue working with Staff, and he would direct 10 Staff to work in conjunction with the Church to find alternative parcels for their relocation to St. 11 Anthony. Thomas noted that, unfortunately, the property located at 2654 Kenzie Terrace would 12 not be the correct site for the Church and felt that the Commission did not have many options. 13 Hatch commented that the Comprehensive Plan wished for the property in that area to be 14 commercial. Plus, the fact that City would need the tax base that would come from a 15 commercial building in order to keep the community as it is. 16 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Stille, that the Petition for Amendment to the Zoning 17 Ordinance is denied due to the following findings of fact: r18 1. Current P ermitted uses for that area are commercial and do not include Churches; 19 2. The City has put forth a significant amount of energy into re-energizing the St. Anthony 20 Shopping Center and would like to continue along the same path; 21 3. The City does not allow non-commercial uses in the St. Anthony Shopping Center; 22 4. The Church would not directly support other commercial entities in the District; 23 5. The conversion of taxable property to nontaxable property would remove a high tax- 24 generating income for the City; 25 6. The changed zoning would have an affect on all commercial properties in the City,.which 26 would be undesirable for all commercial uses. 27 Motion carried unanimously. 28 Bergstrom noted that Pastor Arrigoni had a fine organization within the Church and encouraged 29 him to work with Staff in finding an alternative location. 30 He reminded Mr. Arrigoni that this issue would be before the City Council on Tuesday, July 25, 1 2000, and he encouraged him to be present. 32 2. Public Hearing Application for Conditional Use Permit(Nadi and Roger Abou-Mourad) 30 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 18, 2000 - Page 4 • 1 Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m., and requested a report from Staff. 2 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom noted that the applicants, Hadi and Roger Abou-Mourad, 3 seek to build a Fuel Mart Car Wash on their property at 3813 Stinson Boulevard NE. According 4 to City Code, their project requires a permit for conditional use. A concept review was held 5 before the Commission on June 20, 2000. The applicants have taken the Commission's 6 comments into consideration and resubmitted a complete application to Staff. 7 Chair Bergstrom introduced Mr. Chuck Habiger, HKS Associates, consultants for the applicants 8 and invited him to address the Commission. Mr. Habiger noted that the applicants own the 9 property in question, which is adjacent to the current business. The applicants would like to 10 construct an automated car wash facility to work in conjunction with their gas station located on 11 the adjacent property. Furthermore,the property is currently zoned commercial and all 12 surrounding properties are as well. Mr. Habiger stated that there is currently an abandoned free-. 13 standing restaurant on this site, and this would be demolished and the new facility would be 14 constructed in its place. 15 Mr. Habiger noted that the landscaping had been improved after the Concept Review at the 16 Planning Commission meeting in June 2000. He noted in detail the landscaping proposed. 17 .Additionally, his clients would like to have a future expansion of the property to house a service 18 facility (such as oil changes and repair) and such application will be made at the time they IS 9 propose to go forward with the construction. This is anticipated to take place in approximately 20 one year. 21 Melsha inquired about the hours of operation. Mr. Habiger responded that the facility would be 22 open from 6:00 a.m. to 1 1:00 p.m., and 7:00 a.m. to 11 p.m. on Sunday. 23 Mr. Habiger clarified for Bergstrom that a pylon sign would no longer be used for the facility. 24 Additionally, Mr. Habiger addressed the issue of noise, and stated that a lawnmower would be 25 more audible than the noise from the facility. 26 Hanson inquired about the surface of the future expansion. Mr. Habiger stated that initially,the 27 surface would be grass. 28 Thomas noted that the City is going through.the Village and choosing decorative lighting and 29 inquired if the applicants would be willing to consider some decorative lighting to soften the 30 appearance of the facility. 31 Mr. Habiger felt that it would be possible to tie in the facility's lighting with a master plan. 32 Bergstrom inquired if Mr. Thomas would be willing to coordinate some of the lighting 33 requirements with the applicant. 34 Hanson suggested that Staff be directed to work with the applicant in tying in the lighting issue �5 with the rest of the City's plan. 36 Stille noted that the applicants have enhanced the landscaping since the prior Concept Review, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 31 July 18, 2000 - Page 5 • 1 and inquired if the applicants could tie in the style and coloring with the renovation of Apache 2 Plaza. 3 Bergstrom noted that the final plans'for Apache have not been presented at this time; however, 4 Tillmann noted that much of the'appearance of the proposed car wash facility seemed to tie in 5 with the Apache Plaza plans as noted to this date. 6 Thomas wondered if the Commission could incorporate into the permit application an upgrade to 7 the existing building. Additionally, he inquired if Mr. Habiger had met with the Silver Lake 8 Homeowners Association and Mr. Habiger responded that he spoke with Mr. Douglas Jones (a 9 member of the Homeowners Association) by telephone. Mr. Jones at that time did not see the 10 need to meet with the neighborhood as a whole. 11 Bergstrom introduced,Douglas Jones, 2505 Silver Lane NE, and invited him to address the 12 Commission. Mr. Jones noted that the applicant's facility would be the fifth such facility in the 13 area. His concern is that the City and community should control the facilities that are added to 14 the community. However, Mr. Jones noted that Roger and Hadi Abou-Mourad are excellent 15 businessmen, and would work well with the community. 16 Additionally, Mr. Jones noted that the Planning Commission and City Council should at some 17 point consider the need for sidewalks in the area. He believed it would be appropriate to set •8 aside land for a sidewalk use so that signage and curb cuts are allowed for in the area. He 19 continued by stating that there is two-lane traffic on the street close by, and that there are not any 20 sidewalks. 21 Mr. Jones clarified that he would like to see sidewalks on the East Side of Stinson. 22 Jim Higgins, 2712 St. Anthony Boulevard, spoke to the Commission and stated that he would 23 like to see the Planning Commission require certain green space in all future projects. 24 Mr. Jones noted that Mr. Higgins made an excellent point and stated that it might be a good idea 25 to drain the impervious area in the applicant's facility into a grassy area because the storm sewer 26 that runs along that area goes directly into Silver Lake. 27 Chair Bergstrom requested additional input from the audience, and hearing none, closed the 28 public hearing at 7:57 p.m. and requested comments from the Commissioners. 29 Tillmann noted that she was concerned about the hours of operation of the proposed facility. 30 Additionally, she approved of the idea of sidewalks in the area. 31 Thomas noted that he agreed with the sidewalk suggestion and that the existing property be 32 upgraded and that some type of decorative lighting be incorporated into the facility. Thomas 33 believed that the attractiveness of the area needed to be improved. •34 Stille noted that because the facility is enclosed,he believed there were certain requirements the 35 facility would need to meet with regard to water issues. Additionally, Stille agreed with Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 32 July 18, 2000 - Page 6 is 1 Tillmann that sidewalks need to be implemented. Bergstrom responded that sidewalks have 2 typically been installed during major street reconstruction. Stille noted for the audience's 3 benefit, that the City has applied to the Metropolitan Council for a grant which would assist the 4. City in being more envisionary with regard to the site around Apache Plaza. 5 Hanson expressed concern about the hours of operation of the facility. 6 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Tillmann, that the Planning Commission recommend approval 7 of the Conditional Use Permit for Hadi and Roger Abou-Mourad for the property located at 3813 8 Stinson Boulevard NE for the following reasons and with the following conditions: 9 Reasons 10 1. The proposed use is listed as one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the zoning 11 district in which it is to be located; 12 2. The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general 13 welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property values or 14 improvements in the vicinity; 15 3. The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to provide a 16 service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to 07 the general welfare of the neighborhood or community. 18 Conditions 19 1. The hours of operation may be from 7:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m., but subject to change if 20 noise issues arise from either residents or other occupants in the area; 21 2. The applicant must consult with City Staff regarding compatible decorative lighting, 22 once that pattern is established, and then arrive at a proposal that would be approved by 23 the Public Works Director; 24 3. The applicant must consult with the Public Works Director to design appropriate 25 infiltration of the stormwater on the site; 26 4. That the applicant repair or refurbish the front of the existing building in concert with the 27 design presented at the July 18, 2000 Planning Commission meeting; 28 5. That the applicant replace the dumpster enclosure to the existing building as the current 29 structure is in disrepair; 30 6. That the design construction is compatible with the design drawings submitted with the 31 packet dated 6/29/00 as presented in the Commission's agenda package. 02 Votinrz on the Motion:Bergstrom, Tillmann, Hanson, Thomas, Melsha, and Stille voted aye. 33 Hatch voted nay. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 33 July 18, 2000 Page 7 • 1 The motion carried. 2 Bergstrom noted that this issue would be before the City Council at the July 25, 2000 meeting 3 and he encouraged the applicants to be present at that meeting. 4 VI. POSTPONED APPLICATIONS. 5 None. 6 VII. REPORTS,PRESENTATIONS and/or CONCEPT REVIEWS. 7 1. Concept Review. Murphy's Service Center, 3501 29th Avenue. 8 Chair Bergstrom asked for a report from Staff. Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom reported 9 that the applicant, Richard C. Graff, is seeking to replace the business sign at his Conoco gas 10 station located at 3501 29th Avenue NE. The gas station is a commercial business located in an 11 L 1 zoning district. The proposed sign exceeds allowable dimensions for L 1 zoning. However, it 12 is within the allowable dimensions had his land been zoned Cl. The land has been used for a gas 13 station since 1958. Mr. Graff has owned the business since 1973. Therefore, the use is 14 "grandfathered." Staff has discussed this matter with City Attorney William Soth and it was 15 decided that the conditions supporting a variance existed. 16 Bergstrom introduced Mr. Richard Graff and invited him to address the Commission. Mr. Graff 17 reviewed for the Commission the background of his request, and then reviewed the details of the IV,8 proposed sign. 19 Mr. Graff felt that the current requirements for signage should not apply because his business 20 was grandfathered in many years ago. Mr. Graff reviewed for the Commission that on Memorial 21 Day Weekend, it was noticed that the price sign was bent and split. The St. Anthony Police were 22 called and it was determined that the corner of the sign had been hit by a truck sometime after 23 closing. Mr. Graff noted that the sign cannot be repaired, and that Conoco has several sign 24 designs to go with the new image program. Mr. Graff was present at the Commission's meeting 25 to request a variance for installation of a new sign. The new sign would be installed in the same 26 location and would not be detrimental to other businesses in the surrounding area. 27 Mr. Graff directed the Commission's attention to photographs in the agenda packets which 28 depicted the current sign. 29 Thomas inquired of Mr. Graff if he had any other options with regard to potential signs that 30 Conoco offers. He mentioned this in light of the fact that Mr. Graff s station is so visible within 31 the community. Mr. Graff responded that a certain type of sign is needed for his business, and 32 noted that the proposed sign is an attractive sign and would be appropriate for his type of 33 business. 34 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr. Graff for presenting the Concept Review and he suggested that 35 Mr. Graff work with Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom in going forward with this request. •36 2. Presentation. WSB & Associates Will Present a Selection of Decorative Lighting for 37 29th Avenue. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 34 July 18, 2000 Page 8 • 1 Chair Bergstrom introduced Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, and invited him to address the 2 Commission. 3 Mr. Hubmer reviewed for the Commission that the City Council has approved the installation of 4 decorative street lighting on 29th Avenue. The decision for which type of lighting to be installed 5 has been referred to the Planning Commission for consideration. Therefore, Mr. Hubmer stated 6 that a representative from NSP Outdoor Lighting would be making a presentation to the 7 Commission and would discuss alternatives available for the installation of street lighting. In 8 addition, the City has advertised to the public that this issue would be discussed at the Planning 9 Commission meeting in order to obtain public input and comments from those residents that may 10 be affected by the street lighting. 11 Mr. Hubmer stated that it is anticipated that the Planning Commission will recommend a street 12 lighting style to the City Council for consideration at the July 25, 2000 City Council meeting. 13 However, if additional time for consideration is needed, then the issue would be presented at the 14 City Council meeting on August 22, 2000. 15 Mr. Hubmer continued by presenting a sketch of the proposed area for decorative lighting. 16 Additionally, he directed the Commission's attention to letters dated July 10 and 11, 2000 signed 17 by Mr. Hubmer, which reviewed the background of the issue as well as a time frame for :8 consideration. 19 Mr. Hubmer introduced John Hygrell,NSP Outdoor Lighting, and stated that such department is 20 fairly new for NSP (since the last 7 years). Mr. Hygrell reviewed the options that NSP Outdoor 21 Lighting provides to cities in relation to certain light levels and decorative lighting. Colored 22 photographs were presented to the Commission which.depicted various types of outdoor 23 decorative lighting. 24 Questions were fielded to Mr. Hygrell from the Commissioners regarding the best option for 25 lighting in connection with the existing lighting and lighting levels needed in the particular area. 26 Mr. Chris Padush, 3227 Edward, spoke to the Commission and wished to note that none of the 27 pictures presented at the meeting depicted any overhead wiring. However, as soon as overhead 28 wiring is instituted, the appearance of the decorative lighting is significantly decreased. Mr. 29 Padush noted that he would suggest that the Commission bury the utilities to'improve the 30 appearance of the lighting. 31 James Higgins, 2712 St. Anthony Boulevard, spoke to the Commission regarding the lighting 32 issue. He was concerned that only one person would be choosing the appropriate pedestrian 33 lighting. However, he stated that he was impressed with the aesthetics that NSP Outdoor 34 Lighting had presented at the meeting. Mr. Higgins would like to have citizen input regarding 35 the final outcome of the proposed street lighting. � 6 Mr. Hubmer clarified that the meeting was published to approximately 200 residents asking for 37 public input regarding choosing appropriate street lighting and he had anticipated a larger 38 turnout of residents for the meeting. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 35 July 18, 2000 Page 9 1 Mr. Higgins continued by stating that he hoped that the residents could have input to the decision 2 of decorative lighting. Melsha noted that the way for residents to get involved with the decision 3 is to attend the meetings and to speak to the.Commission to provide input and opinions. 4 Thomas mentioned that soon there will be a citywide neighborhood get together, and that such 5 night out could be an excellent time to promote discussions regarding the street lighting. 6 Hanson inquired if the Commission had a deadline for a final decision on the design. Mr. 7 Hubmer responded that a final decision would be optimal for presentation to the City Council at 8 the August 22, 2000 meeting. 9 Hatch mentioned a possibility of putting up a display at the VillageFest celebration to provide 10 for public information and input. 11 Tillmann mentioned that the Parks Commission was planning on putting up a display for the 12 current proposed plans of the redevelopment of Central Park. She mentioned the possibility of 13 putting the lighting display close to the Parks Commission's display. 14 Mr. Hubmer suggested a consensus on the type or style of the lighting and to continue from that 15 point. However, he wanted to caution the Commission about providing for too much light in the 16 residential areas. He has noted concerns from residents regarding lights close to the house and 07 providing for disruption in the residential areas. 18 Mr. Jim McNeely, 2921 33rd Avenue, stated that he was disappointed that the notice that was 19 mailed to the residents invited the residents to attend the meeting at 7:00 p.m., and noted that the 20 lighting issue was placed nearly last on the agenda. Additionally, Mr. McNeely noted that there 21 was not adequate seating for the residents that did attend because of high attendance for another 22 issue at the meeting. He stated that if the Commission wished to encourage attendance for input, 23 that the item be placed closer to the beginning of the meeting as well as provide for appropriate 24 seating. 25 Mr. Hubmer clarified that all the residents on MSA state-aid roads were invited to the meeting to 26 provide input, and he noted his appreciation of the input the Commission has received from the 27 residents in attendance. His hope was that the lighting chosen for 29th Avenue would be 28 incorporated into the plan for the rest of the City. Mr. Hubmer stated that this was the beginning 29 phase of considering options for the City and noted that this was an open format to express input. 30 Mr. Hubmer noted that it would appear an extra meeting would be in order to address this issue. 31 Some residents from the audience noted that lower-level lighting was the preferred choice. 32 One resident inquired about the deadline of August 22, 2000 and how the Commission was 33 planning on obtaining input that the lighting chosen would be the lighting of choice for the entire 035 4 community. Bergstrom responded that a possible mailing would be in order announcing a public meeting about street lighting. 36 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 18, 2000 • Page 10 1 The issue of burying the utility lines was discussed, and Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom 2 noted that-he was not aware of any provision in the City's Code that mentioned any requirements 3 of burying the cables. He would look into the issue and determine if there was such a mention in 4 the City Code. 5 Bergstrom reviewed that the consensus appears that there needs to be more meetings or 6 additional information. Mr. Hubmer noted that a public information hearing should be held, a 7 notice would be sent to residents, and that a representative from WSB,NSP Outdoor Lighting, 8 and some representatives from the Commission would be present. A display board would be 9 available to present the possible options for lighting. 10 Bergstrom asked Staff to submit an article to the Bulletin newspaper announcing the meeting. 11 The next date would be approximately July 19, 2000 for the Bulletin. 12 13 Tillmann noted that the format for the public information meeting needed to be planned 14 appropriately. Thomas offered to work with Staff on coordinating the meeting, as well as with 15 WSB & Associates. 16 Mr. Hubmer suggested the public information hearing be held on Wednesday, August 9. Then, 0 1 7 the results of that meeting will be discussed at the August 15, 2000 Planning Commission 8 meeting and then referred to the City Council at the August 22, 2000 meeting. The consensus 19 was to have the public information hearing on Wednesday, August 9, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. 20 Thomas mentioned that he believed it would be a good idea to review the City's codes and 21 consider changing the Code to require underground burying of cables. Bergstrom agreed that it 22 was an excellent suggestion. 23 VIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS. 24 1. 2000 Local Water Resources Management Plan Grant Ap12licati6n. 25 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom noted that there was information provided in the 26 Commission's agenda packets regarding this subject. Mr. Todd Hubmer, WSB, noted that the 27 City did not apply for funds from the Met Council 2000 Local Water Resource Management 28 Grant money. The focus of these funds was for the drafting of,ordinances, wetland functions and 29' value assessments, and lake assessment projects. 30 The City might wish to apply for a grant for erosion and sedimentation control associated with 31 construction sites, and the grant would be available again in 2001. Currently, it had been 32 determined that the grant was not necessary for 2000. 33 2. Report from a Representative of the City's Consulting Engineer(WSB) Regarding 34 Stormwater Issues for 37th Avenue Area/Street Reconstruction Program Update. 35 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom noted that there had been some discussion from residents 06 surrounding Mr. Sperry's prior application for a variance to construct a new home. A citizen had 37 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 18, 2000 • Page 11 1 inquired about the plan for all stormwater runoff, and in this respect, Isom invited Todd Hubmer, 2 WSB & Associates,to address the Commission. 3 Mr. Hubmer directed the Commission's attention to a letter and attachment dated July 10, 2000 4 which addressed the issue of street reconstruction and provided an update to the program. 5 Bergstrom confirmed that the City has been on record as supplying 100-year flood protection to 6 the residents. 7 Bergstrom requested that Commissioner Hatch be the representative to the City Council meeting 8 on July 25, 2000. 9 Bergstrom also reviewed that a special meeting would be held on August 1, 2000. 10 IX. COMMISSION INPUT. 11 1. Commissioners Comments. 12 Stille inquired about the Livable Communities Grant. In that respect, Assistant City Manager 13 Isom distributed some follow-up information regarding the grant. Isom requested that a 4 volunteer attend an upcoming meeting with City's Consultant, John Shardlow, regarding this 5 issue. The meeting is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. on Thursday, July 20, 2000. Thomas 16 volunteered to attend the meeting. 17 Hatch thanked Isom for following through on the issue of stormwater runoff. 18 Melsha noted that there was a provision on the enforcement of sign ordinances and he stated that 19 it might be a good idea to consider such in the future. 20 Tillmann noted that one of the residents had been told that, with regard to the street 21 reconstruction,that they would be able to get in and out of their driveways and that has not been 22 possible. She felt it was important that the promises be kept to the residents. 23 Tillmann noted the prior mention regarding green space requirements. She understood that 24 Minneapolis has instituted some green space requirements and she suggested possibly 25 considering the same for.St. Anthony. 26 Tillmann mentioned that it would be an excellent idea to have a book of conditional use permits. 27 Such book-- as indexed--would assist with issuing new permits, and enforcing current ones. . 28 Bergstrom inquired if the Planning Commission had been invited to be in the parade. Assistant 29 City Manager Isom noted that he had not been involved in the planning of the VillageFest. 00 City Council member Dick Horst(from the audience)mentioned that the City Council is Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 18, 2000 • Page 12 1 expecting to participate in the parade and he would encourage the Planning Commission to . 2 participate. Tillmann volunteered to coordinate-the effort for the Planning Commission as Chair 3 Bergstrom would be out'of town for that week. .4 Bergstrom noted that he was not comfortable with the process of the street lighting decisions, 5 such as holding a public hearing at the Commission's regular meeting to obtain input. 6 Hatch inquired if the Commission had decided to discuss types of restrictions for 7 telecommunications towers or declaring a moratorium. Bergstrom stated he remembered that 8 Isom would research the issue. Isom responded that he is currently researching the issue and 9 would report back to the Commission as soon as the research was completed. 10 Horst announced that the City Council appreciates all of the excellent work that the Planning 11 Commission had accomplished. 12 X. ADJOURNMENT. 13 Motion by Hanson, second by Stille, to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 p.m. 14 15 Motion carried unanimously. 06 Respectfully submitted, 17 Sue Selseth 18 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. MEMORANDUM 39 • DATE: 7/11/00 MEETING DATE: 7/18/00 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom RE: Public Hearing. Frontline Church and Outreach Center. Petition for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance. Pastor Bill Arrigoni, representing the Frontline Church and Outreach Center, is asking the City to consider adding a "Church" as a conditional use in a commercial district. Presently "Churches" are a permitted conditional use in all R1, R2, R3, and R4 districts citywide. If this petition is approved/accepted, then "Churches" will also be a permitted conditional use in "C" districts citywide. The Frontline Church has entered into a purchase agreement for the property located at 2654 Kenzie Terrace in the City of St. Anthony. If this petition is approved, the Frontline Church will subsequently subifiit an "Application for Conditional Use Permit." Staff Recommendation: A completed "Petition for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance" has been received by the City. Staff recommends the Commission either approves or denies the petition. If approved, then Staff will draft the necessary Ordinance in preparation for the next City Council meeting. • Cc: City Clerk Kroepli.n 40 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 18, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, for the following purpose: Applicant: Frontline Church, 2819 Hamline Avenue, Roseville Address: for 2654 Kenzie Terrace • Request: Petition for amendment to the City's Zoning Ordinance to add "Churches" to the list of conditional uses in a Commercial district (C). Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at said time and place. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to the Management Assistant 789-8881. Auxiliary aids are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk at 789-8881 to make arrangements. Spencer Isom Assistant City Manager Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin July 5, 2000 • 41 Date: Fee: $100.00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY- Petition for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Applicant: C_L rcj�k -r r ��� .•'�c Address: 'IRkc� t�o.�.�►n 1 t�os�� �` 111f� Phone: Co5"I-�3�O-d2S9 b 55113 Request for change regarding: (check appropriate item(s)) Restrictions upon buildings, structures, or amenities Permitted uses Conditional uses Affected zoning district: Proposed change(s) and reason(s) therefor: ��lrGh Q SS t�6 t Q►�� �045� ►"��n� O I G�S<° 0%.. A-1, Q e o L"=4 twl L-V L;� /PICA CPA) n� (use additional sheet, if necessary) • Signature of pplic 42 • June 29, 2000 Frontline Church and Outreach Center Spencer Isom Assistant City Manager 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 Dear Spencer, We are submitting this letter in preparation for concept review and public hearing. Frontline _ Church& Outreach Center has signed a purchase agreement for the property located at 2654 Kenzie Terrace in St. Anthony Village. We are aware that it is zoned commercial and requires a petition for amendment to zoning ordinance and permit for conditional use in a commercial district for the building to be used as a church. If the City Council would be so gracious as to accept us in to the community of St. Anthony, we would like to use the facility for the purpose of church assembly on the main floor and we would lease the basement level to a storage company. • We established this church in March of 1994 and we have been leasing from Krause Anderson at the Hamline Shopping Center for over five years. It has always been our desire to remain close to the heart of the city since so many churches have moved out into the suburbs because of the necessity growth brings. This facility would work well for us and we feel that we could be a very positive addition to your fine community. Our plans for this facility would be to make a complete renovation on the interior and exterior before occupancy would take place. Our goal is to close November 1, 2000 and move in on February 1, 2001. We will submit plans for new sidewalks,handicap ramp,parking lot resurfacing, new signage, and beautiful landscaping that will compliment the St. Anthony "Green-space Plan." We plan to spend approximately$75,000 on the exterior and$180,000 on the interior. . I would like to thank you and the Committee Members for the time and consideration that you afforded us at the Planning Committee meeting on June 20, 2000. Enclosed you will find more detailed information on our organization and our plans. Thank you once again for your consideration. Sincerely, • Bill Arrigoni, for Frontline Church&Outreach Center 2819 Hamline Avenue.Roseville MN 55113 Frontline Church & Outreach Center 651.636.2594 Frontline Midway Church&Outreach Center 1571 University Avenue.5t Paul MN 55104 651.659.0151 43 Narrative I. Profile of Frontline-Church Senior Pastor: Bill Arrigoni graduate of Rhema Bible Training Center Tulsa, OK, licensed and ordained with World Revival Network Kansas City,MO. Pastor for six years, associate youth Pastor at Living Word Christian Center Brooklyn Park five years. Staff Two full-time and six part-time employees Established: March 1St 1994 Membership: 150 people (45 families) Socioeconomic: Primarily middle to upper middle class, racially mixed, per capita giving is 50% above national average. Demographic: Majority of adults 25-60, married with 3 children, youth group of 25, • residing in suburbs (Maplewood, Blaine, Ham Lake, Hastings, Champlin, Brooklyn Park, Ramsey, Savage, Woodbury). Subsequent Establishments: We established Frontline Midway Church and Outreach Center on University Avenue in St. Paul January of 1999. This Outreach Center was established as a church and a place of humanitarian activity for our entire organization. Many of those whom we have helped are now faithful members of our Midway church. II. Activities on site at 2654 Kenzie Terrace General Services: Fridays at 7:00 pm & Sundays at 10:00 am We would use this facility for church assembly, this would include music in the main sanctuary where adults would assemble followed by a Biblical message. We simultaneously provide ministry for all other ages (infants, toddlers, children,pre-teens, and teens) in different meeting rooms throughout the facility. Prayer Services: Thursdays at 7:00 pm The whole congregation assembles together in the main sanctuary for corporate prayer where we pray for our cities, nation, leaders as well as prayer requests from anyone in the community. 1 44 Youth Meetings (ages 13-18): Friday evenings at 7:00 and one Saturday per month at 7:00 pm Youth participate in worship and then hear a gospel message. .Vacation Bible School: Usually in June or August for ages 7-12 Children are invited from the community as well as our church and they join many fan Bible oriented activities which teach them about God and how to live right. This is a five day program which inspires children to follow the Lord and live godly lives. Daily: Office hours are from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm We normally staff the church offices Monday through Friday with two to three people throughout the day to take care of general church business as well as ministry work. III. Community Outreaches Picnics: We would like to do concerts in the park if permissible as well as open house picnics for the Village of St. Anthony residents. Thanksgiving & Christmas: We.have had the privilege to spread good will to those in need on these special Holidays by giving them plentiful food baskets which have been provided by our church, community businesses and other churches. Last year we distributed 200 food baskets at Thanksgiving and Christmas. We were also a Toys For Tots distributor at Christmas time for families in need, many of which were local residents. Helping Hands: This ministry is somewhat of a spiritual S.W.A.T. Team. When someone in our community informs us that they need any kind of help, spiritual or practical (food, transportation, shelter, clothing, ect.) our team springs into action immediately to help and to pray with people whether or not they have even visited our church. Last year this ministry spent over$7000.00 in meeting these types of needs throughout Roseville and St. Paul, yet we plan to further expand this ministry. This type of work usually takes place at the recipient's home or apartment, hospitals and nursing homes. Community Involvement: We are very interested in getting involved in community events since we consider community relations to be a very important part of our purpose as a church. • 2 45 IV. Organizational Vision Church Planting: We plan to continue to plant more new churches in areas where they needed throughout the Twin City Metropolitan area. Our,motto is "Bring the church to the people". Evangelistic: We have been very active in making a difference in our communities in which we have been located. It is not our goal to transplant people but as I said"bring the church to the people"to those who need or want a church. We do not believe in a style of outreach which"outreaches its welcome". We seem to have plenty of God's work coming to us and we simply respond. Our outreaches in St. Paul have brought us before thugs, drug addicts, alcoholics, prostitutes and some very moral people. We have worked with other ministries, one of which is a ministry to prostitutes in St. Paul (Breaking Free) and we have seen some phenomenal results. Our ministry in St. Anthony Village will take on a flavor and form of its own, because we will simply respond to the needs of this community. Frontline has no interest in drawing any of those whom we have and are helping in the Midway area to the St. Anthony Village. We simply would like to have the opportunity to be accepted into this great community where we can take our place as a beacon for hope and good for all to see. • Missions: We have been heavily involved in oversees missions work. We have brought three teams to India during the last fifteen months, we ministered to children, pastors, and thousands of people. The mission activities consisted of conducting meeting and distributing to the needs of the people. We intend to continue to maintain and increase our missionary activities. Stated Purpose: The purpose of the church as we see it, is to first minister to the spiritual and if necessary physical needs of the membership, to bring them to a place of maturity in Christ Jesus. Secondly we must provide the inspiration, training, and means to reach out to others. This is the heart of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. 3 46 V. Site Plan Storm Water retention and drainage: Although we will be doing quite extensive work on the exterior.of the building we will not be affecting the grade of the lot. The site has very adequate storm sewer access at the south side of the property as indicated on the site plan: The property has a steep grade which will carry water swiftly to the storm sewer. The north side of the lot drains towards Kenzie Terrace. We have no intention of introducing any new elements which would encumber the flow of drainage water. Demolition: We intend to remove the following items from the property. 1. Sign and pole near front entrance. 2. Sign pole at north west corner of building 3. Sign and pole at southwest corner near the rear of site.. 4. Awning above front entrance. Materials: 1. New awning made of canvas (color yet to be determined) 2. Parking lot resurfaced in asphalt. 3. Fence at rear southwest wood split rail. 4. Dumpster enclosure brown treated wood with colored fence gate. 5. Signage brick base identical to brick on front of building, letters metal (color to be determined). Logo Flame & Sword sculpted metal. 6. Diamond shaped accents to soldier course in brickwork, metal (color to be determined). 7. Additional brickwork on northwest corner of building brick identical to existing on front. 8. Sidewalks made of cement. 9. Landscaping walls on various planting beds constructed of landscaping block in Buff color matching that in the rear of the property on truck ramp. 10. Foliage for planting beds will be a variety of shrubs plants,flowers and . ornamental trees which will blend nicely with the existing landscaping of adjacent properties and the St. Anthony"Green-space Plan". Easements: Frontline Church is willing to offer the city of St. Anthony an easement for a four-foot walking path running down the westerly side of the property adjacent to the apartment building. • 4 07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI PAC COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT • Date: may 30 2000 RECEIVED OF Frontline Church and Outreach Center the sum of one thousand oll Kenzie Terra e DOLLARS as earnest money and in part payment for the purchase of property at 2654 situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Lot 002 Block 002 St. Anthony Vills A ("MRl CTR Addn No. 1 Pro ID: 0702923240020 and 0702923240021 together with the following personal property: NIA all of which property the undersigned has this day sold to the Buyer for the sum of: Six hundred and vent -five thousand dollars ($625.000.00)DOLLARS, which the Buyer agrees to pay in the following manner: earnest money herein paid as 100000 upon lease signature and 9�„,000.000 , upon removal of contingency#3 (See Addendum#1) as addit6bnal earnest money and 57.000.QO, cash on or bcfuie Scvtcmbcr 1, X001, the date of closing and the balance of$558.000.00 by financing as shown on the attached addendum. 1. DEEDlMARKETABLE TITLE-. Subject to performance by the Buyer, the Seller agrees to execute and deliver a general/marketable Warranty Deed conveying marketable title to said premises subject only to the following exceptions: (a) Building and zoning laws, ordinances, State and Federal regulations. (b) Restrictions relating to use or improvement of the premises without effective forfeiture provision. (c) Reservation of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota. (d) Utility and drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements. (e) Rights of tenants as follows: **See Attached Addendum • 2. REAL ESTATE TAXES. Real estate taxes due and payable in the year of closing shall be prorated between Seller and Buyer on a calendar year basis to the actual date of closing unless otherwise provided in this Agreement. Real estate taxes payable in the years prior to closing shall be paid by Seller. Real estate taxes payable in the years subsequent to closing shall be paid by Buyer. 3. SPECIAL A Q n rr . r • '1e-eut n THE P A ^Ii' GLOSING S�,lEl� LL PA rSk4keeot��r =04 A RL+/r SE T LSD C i 1 PAY GN DD t -13— Y'tYY'�I71C139'LTG'�r7Ct�',7 cox. z :CV:,:1a.rL BASIS 0 special assessme by the Givt4Geuneil ef-ether-gevemmeHtd assessing aethefi es. (Seller's pr-&Yisien fef payment shaH be A and before the date ef elesia& for-payrapent -M Seller-shall pay en date of eleAng any defeffe(keal estate • 4. PRORATIONS. All items customarily prorated and adjusted in connection with the closing of the sale of the property herein including but not limited to rents, operating expenses, interest on any debt 07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI R 48 COMMERCIA ANDUSTRIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT • 2,654 Kenzie Terrace Page 3 of 5 assumed by Buyer, shall be prorated as of the date of closing. It shall be assumed that the Buyer will own the property for the entire date of the closing. 5. DAMAGES TO REAL PROPERTY. If there is any loss or damage to the property ty the between party e hurcuf and the date of closing, for any reason, the risk of loss shall be destroyed or substantially damaged before the closing, this Purchase Agreement shall become null and void, at Buyer's option_ Buyer shall have the right to terminate this Purchase Agreement within 30 days after Seller notifies Buyer of such damage. Upon said termination, the earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer and Buyer and Seller agree to sign a cancellation of Purchase Agreement. 6. EXAMINATION OF TITLE. Within a reasonable time after acceptance of this Agreement, Seller shall furnish Buyer with an Abstract of Title or a Registered Property Abstract certified to date including proper searches covering bankruptcies and State and Federal judgments, liens and levied and pending special wscsslllents. Duyer shall have 10 business days after receipt of the Abstract of Title or Registered Property Abstract either to have Buyer's attorney examine the title and provide Seller with written objections or, at Buyers own expense, to make an application for a title insurance policy and notify Seller of the application. Buyer shall have 10 business days after receipt of the commitment for title insurance to provide seller with a copy of the commitment and written objections. Buyer shall be deemed to have waived any title objections not made within the applicable 10-day period set forth above, except that this shall not operate as a waiver of Seller's covenant to deliver a Warranty Deed, ® unless a Warranty Deed is not specified above. If any objection is so made, Seller shall have 10 business days from receipt of Buyer's w.citten title objections to notify Buyer of Seller's intention to make title marketable within 120 d4ys Ervin Seller's receipt of such written objection. If notice is given,payments hereunder required shall be postponed pending correction of title, but upon correction of title and within 10 days after written notice to Buyer the parties shall perform this Purchase Agreement According t.n its terms. If no such notice is given or if notice is given but title is not corrected within the time provided forth, this Purchase Agreement shall be null and void, at option of Buyer; neither party shall be liable for damages hereunder to the other and earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer; Buyer and Seller agree to sign cancellation of Purchase Agreement. If title to the property to be found marketable or be so made within said time, and Buyer shall default in any of the agreements and continue in default for a period of 10 days. Then and in that case the Seller may terminate this contract and on such termination all the payments made upon this contract shall be retained by Seller as liquiddtW aauiagoN, tinge being of the essence. This provision shall not deprive either party of the right to enforce the specific performance of this contract provided this contract has not been terminated and provided action to enforce such specific performance shall be commenced within six months after such right of action shall arise. 7. POSSESSION.Seller shall deliver possession of the property on the date of closing. 8. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. See attached addendum. 9. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE FOR ALL PROVISIONS OF THIS CONTRACT. 10. WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There are no wells. BUYER AND SELLER INITIAL: Buyer(s). Seller(s) 11. ADDENDA.Attached are(2)addenda,which are made a part of this Agreement. 07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI PA =. 49 COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT 2654 Kenzie Terrace • Page 3 of S 12.NMCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: (a) Survival. All of the warranties, representations, and covenants of this Agreement shall survive and be C1tf0rceabl0 after the.closing- (b) Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the parties and supercedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties regarding the property. There are no verbal agreements that change this Agreement and no wctivul of any of its terms will be effective unless in a writing executed by the parties. rovicions of this Agreement shall be binding (c) Succesburs turd Assigns. If this Agreement is assigned, all p.. on successors and assigns. 13. ACCEPTANCE DEADLINE.This offer to purchase,unless accepted sooner, shall be null and void at 11:59 PM June 5_ 2000 and in such event all earnest money shall be refunded to Huyer. NOTICE Jim Stimmler Kraus-Anderson Realty Represents Seller (Agent) (Company Name) Represents (Agent) (Couipway N,mx) • THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD,SEEK coMPETENT ADVICE. Dated:_�2Ls�1yo .. Dated: SELLER BUYER SELLER BUYER Selling Agent • 07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI PA 5® COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT 2654 Kenzie Terrace • Page I of 5 ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT#1 Dated: May 30,2000 Property Addrm: 2654 Kenzie Terrace Property ID: 070292324002.0 and 07029232-40021 OFFER SUBJECT TO: 1. Obtaining successful bank tmancinga cc,ePAabtiL k c 2. Building appraises for purchase price. 3. Obtaining special use permit for buyer's use; church and storage on bottom floor, as leme space. 4. Inspection by qualified professional on roof,foundation, mechanicals, electrical and plumbing. Seller will bring into satisfactory working condition if any repair. are needed to comply with all local codes and ordinances. 5. Subject to Buyer's and Seller's attorney's approval of purchase agreement within 10 days after Buyer's and Seller's signatures of Purchase Agreement. 6.. Buyer's review and acceptance of a well disclosure statement. .7. Upon removal of Contingency#3 (obtaining a special use permit from the city of St. Aultiouy for said use)Buyer will deposit an additional$9,000.00 earnest money in a Kraus-Anderson trust account within 10 business days of completion. Said bust ac:uuunt shall be an interest bearing account. 8. Upon signatures of Buyers and Sellers of this Purchase Agreement dated May 30, 2000, shall void Purchase Agreement between same Buyer and Seller dated April 7, 2000, April 1 R, 2000, and May 4, 2000, and earnest money of Purchase Agreement dated April 7, 2000 shall be applied to purchase agreement dated May 30, 2000. 9. Property shall remain on the market for sale until all contingencies have been removed. However, any or all subsequent offers or purchase agreements shall be subject to cancellation of this agreement agreed up on by the buyer. 10. Seller shall grant buyer the first right of first refusal on the sale of the second mortgage on the same terms as acceptable to other purchaser. 11. Buyer will indemnify Seller for any costs/assessments to Seller related to the application to the City for a special use permit. cco�qq__( " 12. First Right of Refusal: For.69"days after the date of this agreement,Seller will not enter into another purchase agreement that activates Buyer's first right of refusal before September 1, 2000. Thereafter, upon written notification to buyer that seller has received another acceptable offer,buyer shall remove all contingencies(within 5 business days) and proceed to closing within 60 days or this purchase agreement shall become null and void and all earnest money shall be returned to buyer with any accumulated interest. The above closing date of 60 days after notification is contingent upon buyer being released from its present lease at the Hamline Shopping Center, otherwise closiug date shall occur September 1,2001. Seller shall pay all special assessments levied and including or payable prior to September 1, 2000. Buyer shall pay all special assessments levied or pending after September 1, 2000 as ordered by the City Council or other governmental assessing authorities. Buyer and Seller shall prorate as of date of closing,real estate taxes due and payable in the year of Closing. 07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI PAG 51 COMMEKCIAL-j DUSTRIAL PYJK HASE AGREEMENT • 2654 Kenzie Terrace page 5 of 5 ADDENDUM TD PURCHASE AGREEMENT#2 Dated: May 30,200a Property Address; 2654 Kenzie Terrace Property ID: _ 0702c1232400m and 0702923240021 FINANCIAL ADDENDUM: Purchase Price: $525.000.00 Cash ai Closing: 57,000.00 Bank Financing: 41 9N O-00 Seller Financing: 150,000.00 by second mortgage, 5 year term. Payments to begin 90 (Note at a.rate of 8-1/2% for days after closing, however, interest will accrue as of dale of 15 year amortization with a closing: • balloon at end of 5"year.) *Earnest money to be held in trust account by Kraus-Anderson (upon removal of contingencies, earnest money to be transferred to interest bearing trust account)_ • GSM , ry =ITLE SURVEY / �r DETAIL ' - � ��+O�S � c`'s � " I ''I �t-'' ,w� .��__.wr�r •r rte.. ` pJ �d1� � ty Y S1` I Cw w�•�-^a1r r.L1 r��.ar• - 1': J � �� :A , �0� ,�A,•• Z _ I w_.ya .._ate_-tea..wr L A ��pa{••Q S ,�' i l i 4I _ S i�/ � I r.......r a..s • ? _ a o.r.�r a rrr 2 I I I _ �•VS.�?G''. r°•'°�„��..��..r�`�.rr�fir' . pigiii:. S •\ Y? i �\'Old I I ��9�'1 = � ° YA-iY•1.. ._ I.�.r�M�rrr�_.�e..•�r�rw... 4.■,. a .. . ':'.:�:,•-:- y •.; \ � , (� Al- 2Z^.:.�. w wr.-n'1..•r F 4-r rr w...._,r(r'1r Itb +.` MCI07Y MAP .::� • .r•r rw r.r.�.�.w rte...�._ INKITI •qm N,m _ _ _ _ j. •'i.' � \ • V�4 L � V m • µ vii.�u r��r raF _�r� # 'r,e �{•q-+rte yy�� \ /� �•, 5 � � !. S b r_wr_w..r_nrr■gr R_rrp � •,,:c+.':i �'.e-..-,'Y a tir.•.r r .a_a r r.-..Sw•r :�, w.■ r rrn.n fin, �•� �' .1 �.,'RY1Z:�'�i',_ 'rr�.._.��r y _ r_._.r�r.a i G S TE —■sao ro- r..s rrm r am M en ;'L;: s11.x* (nq.i�•.�i 7S mro.e.r. rru s•.m w u•e.rw do ' >,;�`? - .71� WE rtcM.m■ m.e zx>o(.n o . SI —�•••°•rm _°C' Hakanson ABTA ACSM SURVEY +�* —I-ra.a ■ r ■�■ Anderson roa t •�"•. "B ?¢ Assoc.,Inc. CUSTOM UOUIDATORS INC. w 4.:'� - __ ®e tea^:•, .~ - - a.�.•a-••�r-^� ST. ANTHONY• MINNESO cRc TA 1 �,� :.:}.. _ .. .. �• Q - m rr■..L.�•tea•�+ y. ■ioan> rue i��y A�• ^�, en •�g.�zArS; y'';k G� DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT SITE AREA iii 739 5F.(N.56 ACRES) ,+ x3.}. •'� -9 e =211A.REFN AREA c4,a s.1. I.66 ACRES) L..•1, ;; �?7 _ O SITE AREASTORE 77,57&5 F. 1.76 m SdACES . � PARKING SPADES „� - NOTTN RETaLL&GOING 50,150 S.F. h-3 ''F` EXIST0IG 9AL061G AREA 15,Ya0 S.F. EXPANSION BORDIK.TEA 4,00 pR1VE-TNRO PNAfd'GLLT ADDED N 50UTN RPTAIL BIALpNG 50,550 S.F. EXISTING 8111L00G AREA 99,%1 S.F. Ep)E(pSATNA9U10N p(1LQ AREA SEATS) 10O S.F. -11074 CA OT7 MEIN I SS 5F p(PANSNR/SILLQNG TEA b00 S.F. NLRTIW.OfIN RETAIL PARKING MO SPACES �ryf �''fd LEA (U`9PKlS/1000 S.F.OF RETAIL AREA) vz 4r NEST RETALL BJADIN6 I&,700 S.F. a�P DAYCARE SPKE 10,0.70 S' - ST.ANTNOFY PORE STATION 6,700 S.F. - If PARKING SPKES N 9PKC9 (1.&SPACEW=SF OF RETAIL NROIRK P097 EIALOWG SI 000 5 F f y r PARK0G SPKES (7Z SPACESq=SPACES OF RET?� IEAR `� 1•`'? f- f I'---` CIA,it II II I II II I II II III_I-I_�Ill . 'A+ � Iiely6 uq" _ fl IQ� 0--l'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� N f� EV J �•�. �� � I I I I I I ' �'• r::z., ,. ,�, ... Lao. p I I I I •r• EC! SAINT ANTHONY r =� SHOPPING u {� . L� ` CENTER SAINT ANTHONY,MINNESOTA ' _ y �.'• c -s PREPARED TOR REPUBUC INVESTMENT COMPANY ;-0 J -e' Tuv is M A o.ly Inc. ' P 5 M 5T R01 AN – PTfF 7700 EAG woup%icy. '601 *16 a ow.Aq a olo 55&33 54 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY RESOLUTION 00-059 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST TO TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission to consider a request from Frontline Church, for the commercial property located at 2654 Kenzie Terrace, to amend the City Zoning Ordinance to add "Church" as a permitted conditional use in a "C", commercial zoning district; and WHEREAS, following due consideration, the Planning Commission recommended Council denial of said request. NOW., THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that in agreement with the findings of the Planning Commission at their July 18, 2000 meeting, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby denies the request for the zoning ordinance amendment submitted by Frontline Church. Adopted this day of 92000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed by Administration: City Manager 55 MEMORANDUM DATE: 7/12/00 MEETING DATE: 7/18/00 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom RE: Public Hearing. Application for Conditional Use Permit for a Fuel Mart Car Wash on the Commercial Property at 3813 Stinson Blvd. NE. The applicants, Hadi and Roger Abou-Mourad, seek to build a Fuel Mart Car Wash on their property at 3813 Stinson Blvd. NE zoned C. According to City Code their project requires a permit for conditional use. A concept review was held before the Commission on 6/20/00. The applicants have taken the Commission's comments into consideration and resubmitted a complete application to staff. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Commission review the minutes from 6/20/00 and the application found in the Commission's packet and either approve or deny said application. Please note, when making a decision, that a conditional use, for practical purposes, is the same as a permitted use. However, the City can require the applicant to construct according to reasonable conditions placed upon said applicant by the City Council. Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin • 7671 at pagD eS post-it®Fax Note From 70 ICo./Dept. Co.phone I phone# Fax# Fax# 56 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 18, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, for the following purpose: Applicant: Hadi and Roger Abou-Mourad, 3813 Stinson Boulevard • Address: 3801 Stinson Boulevard Request: Conditional use permit for a Fuel Mart Car Wash at 3813 Stinson Boulevard Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at said time and place. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to the Management Assistant 780-8881. Auxiliary aids are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk at 789-8881 to make arrangements. Spencer Isom Assistant City'Manager Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin July 5, 2000 • 57 -)ate: Fee: $130.00 • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Applicant: P6U Phone: W2—" 70 Address: Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc.): © � Street address and/or legal description of property in question: Zoning district in which property is located: Lin P4 W eR4?4A --- Conditional use proposed: tt'11 q ce5rip c ` Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied before a conditional use may be authorized. Please respond to these conditions, using additional sheets, if necessary. 1) The proposed conditional use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the zoning district in which it is to be located. C N'\ O-AP--- LAG+�t& LIM 2) The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of Qersons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property values or improvements in the vicinity. 3) The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general we"Ifev t he neig boyhood or munity._ y�S Signature of applicant: - - - CIVIL ENGLNEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 50 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES URBAN PLANNLNG CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PROJECT NARRATIVE: June 30, 2000 On behave of Hadi & Roger Abou-Mourad, the owners,they respectfully request that the City of St. Anthony grants a Conditional Use Permit to construct an automated tunnel car wash on the property site at 3801 Stinson Boulevard Northeast, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55421. PROPERTY ZONING: The property is currently zoned Commercial and all surrounding adjacent property is also zoned Commercial. Automotive uses are permitted as a Conditional Use under this zoning classification. SITE AREA AND EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is 28,143.64 square feet or .646 acres in area. The site currently has a freestanding fast food restaurant building located on it, which would be demolished, and all other site improvements removed if approval is received from the City. LANDSCAPING: The existing over-story boulevard trees surrounding the site are proposed to remain. Additional landscaping is proposed as screening and enhancements in the islands at each end of the car wash building,.along the north foundation of the car wash building, along Stinson • boulevard, and several over-story trees at the north west edge of the site. FUTURE EXPANSION: The owners will request approval from the City next year to construct a 30 foot wide by 109 foot long, 6 bay service facility attached to the south of the car wash structure. PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT: The Owners propose to construct a 108' — 8" long by 30 foot 8 inch wide car wash structure totaling 3,343 square feet. The proposed height of the - structure will be 14 feet 8 inches. It is proposed that a 55 gal. Trash cart will be stored inside the electrical service room and only placed outside for weekly pick-ups. OPERATION: The operation of the convenience car wash'will be in conj unction.with the owner's existing Conoco service station & convenience store business located on the adjacent property immediately to the north of this site. It is proposed to construct an internal connection between the two sites to facilitate vehicular circulation from the gas station to the,car wash facility. It is proposed that the car wash will have the same hours of operation as the Conoco fuel mart. The facility will be fully automated with out the need for on-site employees. HICS ASSOCIATES INC • 821 RAYMOND AVENUE SUITE 100 ST.PAUL,MN 55114 PHONE 651/659-9732 F.4X 651/659-0891 E-Mail:info @hksassociares.cum • ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES: The building is proposed to be constructed with brick and `rock face' unit masonry facade, a 4 foot high pre-finished metal facia and cap flashing. Colors of the metal facia and cap flashing will be copper. The owners plan to upgrade the facade of their existing building; in conjunction with several other improvements to their existing building, with a new pre-finished metal canopy of the same color. The `rock face' unit masonry will be tan in color at the base 4 courses and alternate with a dark brown brick coursing. Refer to Architectural drawing A-2 for detail of the proposed coursing. SIGNAGE: The Owners propose to install signage at the north and south facades of the building with the text to read"CAR WASH". Refer to Architectural sheet A-2 for specific locations. There will be two monument directional signs located on the site for traffic flow and signage on each end of the building designating entrance and exit for customer information. PARKING: It is proposed to pave the lot excluding the future expansion area. 9 parking stalls are proposed to service the car wash facility including one Handicap stall. • • PUN SYMBOLS: GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS n4­m a I ...4sm4 u...na.r v va,w.— 'Fr C WWVAnaa f0„004$n=C.'as w10079 A R¢ 1MWR 7.1"1 4PR ft SfSOClrK"I—A CVAa. []nSI1MG O,.Y46n . PUN SHEET.INDEX aNe�co1w SHEET NAME SHEET / - Iwnw 1RIt SHEET CI maw ___ ___ FUEL MART CAG CONDITIONS AND afarnfo is BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAN — PRELIYINARY REMOVAL PLAN CS •u.4.o -------- PRELMINARY STE LAYOUT PLAN C4 o.a m,o,x ""INART GRADING.ORAINACE CS 00'EROSION CONTROL PLAN CAR WASH PREwu+ARY ITIRIIY Pun Cs —a-- ® c .....r PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PUN L1 ca a o.o PREUYINARY FLOOR PLAN At PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS A7 uaiwa Ow•:am0 =_tom THIS PUN SET CONTAINS 9 SHEETS SAINT ANTHONY, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: ate, HADI & ROGER ABOU-MOURAD . 3813 STINSON BLVD. N.E. PROJECT LOCATION ST. ANTHONY, MN 55421 UTILITY SYMBOLS: nn '. Pnnnosfn swu.m.w+ :{. • � + + i� I TINE a r PREPARED BY: ✓ ® CIVIL RNGLNSeRUNG aI UtlOSCAPE A ® CrURE unn4 -I ' ImLRONMENTAL SERVICES -~a me r4 .0.N +_ca,no u. .... ; URBAN PUNNING .............._ consmcnoN SE RVICES yi i 571 RAT M6 D AYUNT 100 1+ wnt Nul,u9NamA 5 vn, LSI-53-75Y7 YAL•651-631-01191 EkAL1 16a30CA1¢ Y , ,. aaw c a 1+++ ? PROJECT NAPE AND LOCATION: FUEL MART ggTT ® CAR WASH NTHot�.IY= �� �-q� •. SAINT ANTHONY, MINNESOTA LOCATION MAP *,.— NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION maaa�a = a HKS PROJECT NUMBER: 10316 wrpamml —:._- SUBMISSION DATE: 6/$9/00 —.i.- C1 i CUSTOG COWIM MOTEL 1. �amoo-.R fwgmMM�M IOPd 90141-. .� mm w C Ali VR111 to="11TH or MM T MNC PC_ A OF�.�k MO to K naA Mild r l..®.6811 cmGT xmL IO Q 16G OIIID Nm1 10 �m o .<� umm A.L. m 17,4 17,4 Sllf�v�'Y.• WwsTBYC o a +.. W1 1.RM 1.W01 RAX%.m7O16 A M=M=FW m Yl .ra LOT 7 BLOB J, .fPlCNB-pVZ4r RU'S67 4911A73; .I✓N, " w."m m "--WWI FUEL MART • ;#3803-3813 CAR WASH 1 I I I S BLOCK 1 i BLDG. ; � 3801 STINSON BLVD. ;+ ;-% ' "• ,v i _ + ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 55421 ` 1iP ----�yaM gal l"[r� 3 s• ��I y'p _;_ �"' � 0- HADI & ROGER � . ABOU—MOURAD , # 3801 3813 STINSON BLVD, N.E. { ; 1 STORY BRICK 8 ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA a 1 R w eirr I i BUILDING i$� 55421 •; EXISTING l., o.9 ro. � ���,,, � j , t ,� q11 • ; CONDITIONS a�,ri ________�_••`____hatC Si00IrrJ=_____...�_.__�__ 1_ J; AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAN Z je .7J9[h .! 7X Nd — — ' ! - -- - I T7 r:2Si47 3:�.(_. ...':e SJ.4 4.:7......,. - TH.'S IS %I C:.7i!%! ­AT -­IS r,4a 4'/,7 T:-_ - ' VSI �IT IS 945-:' V_7=rot- i 4CCC7_4•._ - I'TN �.'N.i"U4 STF/i:4,7i rrA:! •S- - ^' as"G rraaar as •y i.T k K':.:'.G tr'+acrs• %••:7 F:T41ACS.M n4.':_ UTL=S:14'/EYS: JDI'- / — ir•kir:r ra3..•..ar r x r:::J.7¢ =i•;; a;.:�c...rr X'•rr_:%s r'.a.+.-.•r. 'r :, =Sr49_ISH_D 4.Y- 4._aTe_ 91 44 7E 4. .r+ra:•.•r-�-ca.cv.-:_.::rt r ra r.-•s s..a,•.^:n :Y 15524 7 jl,Ir rA:-r l:£..S!,44,7A,73,, - 17 4;:t 7C F 743::4 '�_.?_:%, F,`;7 — ::ryq.T• P;;7sua.•;r r� ;rte,4C_:,:74:i sr4�it4zs c:4 s -- ' - �i' Jas Nu IQ1N ' •SSS pa5'••'m .� lsalc •.A' NOT FOR CONSIRUCDON 03101Y 14ra CMMtC.sue mmm%Me va O[Qw..n.no m111p1 ro ocammsam01.c1oL mI mm=ma m ma m4 MA 0 O=a1 lcu. -1-0Y2I-IIY ool�b�Tea .. - a m ECM XUM.Im..aa&Whit Q3MR om.a 'am mmmlmmlm . - le.mam mm ma.0 am umm[am u 9"seat x�. . 1-m O"(a111 cm W 9ML E"m O of m mmtas>o1 1ARMC.R.IIC'EUMM WL IMm alro m101112 - minmol(YORAL mmnco 11n COM maa pmw sm E I w IMwm as Yaw rW1 me „Z SUFCCOM calls m1C11m11 mmnla LIZ-- .'a m al1�flY 6 NLL 101 YII. Im YI-�FOYI nwt OE114 wa on °4`°m""p11 FUEL MART m4�m� N380BLOCK ; CAR WASH NO Op1p1 �1 S BLOCK 1 LelDC.- ---J 3801 STINSON BLVD. ' ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA �.�. 55421 1144 Iame I.mm Km Co410 I"!9� II>a ARAB aS fir 01.4 bvf aN.W 1.000 TOR: n mmmcr/xolosm Iuum .Ir..(.n.: - ro a loam m a noam -, A----I HADI & ROGER' n ABOU—MOURAD, —' 1 N 3BOI ��( 3813 STINSON BLVD, N.E. I sInmo� I STORY BRICK �� ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA j I nmalacr anima I� i BUILDING „ 55421 C.9K mm roE814.0) r 1 o 1 I' ------------ , AEWK V I , j• • 06111E 1:6 2nQ 1 I n E WWMQ j 1 . I � amm R�11$L111 PRELIMINARY I REMOVAL PLAN 1 'Imlon mm1C aaww MIMIC aM1c I - I uaxa a n Roo ro E n1FQm I6a0 uR I I sum lwx " MO 1 C„ o, _Dw_ I Im11 on. IAI/E. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C3 Ch _ L eg.MWW SM Mao W40%=4K CAL.III)WO 004 11p D�.OImF'm6itL>bl 1a VM1 UIWCQ.t•p431000 eolat�r.Iao IRMOMYI Fs610 90[M01 WI m6 UW.IM 60Q 41D 14 oM s0 Osm D K mD0[all trm wo OMIT smmsllvrtA zlll`D UssM IWUUMG a st a06D6 D q0[cm Wm Imm 0110-& canla�ynu4 smKa I QwKcm s"MA III l M L==6 All)01Dm6 00 DOW wil.41ou ISM M r0-su-Ira U6a0 YO w mms:RMIm 01b1 D sm 00 in wA K M a 1�.L IOI YII� 01u YIyF1Yl m0UL4m 904E Ismv¢/W"M Umml O sn 060Ynm m WWp6 mm PL a FUEL MART 83803-3813 ; CAR WASH 1 S BLOCK � ;BLDG. 3801 STINSON BLVD. n ---ym----� � uao' ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA an -- 55421 � --gym- ----- ---- -- �---- � k pi I . �eu .-..' '.. .'..PROPOW,BUILONG.: taLC 1 utl volt 0 .7_- ..... .11 -. .. ...i. u HA & ROGER. ABOU-MOURAD , I kI ,,,• , 3813 STINSON BLVD, N.E. tlO"a a"'d FUNFE EXPANSION ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA k murz&a �t Saar 55421 am 0000[sm i...... ...-. _.. ....,... ..1 �______._-.. 1 v .I . yoy........ : ..:.... �{.......... , k � `w PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PLAN w,mr —29b— It it — — tl —— o-... a r NOT FOR CONSnrJC110N �.. C4 Al W a/aaa.FLO"CWWX ports; I, .mono m t cc m1a w m M. " no maf.o1m aeall m s.-= R mLOOI 101 unm ma" ItIL nw ma mm rw,t w-®a mialm I-0o-m-lua mo L oxnw a WW 1m%Orr n[latum"anum OF . cape anaa ra ta=AC rtmm w m sun CF= .ara mlcammle a1o1c n[mnwna swu Yr?1m.mm of mm aom SILKIX aFt Y�IaCTYY - _ - of 1x.C60O.M a%alYroa mmerc.ru m.m L gym=91 161ML"0®a cwm Kam 1001 m ams.a FLAMM cm ocmw Mawe a-umulo Ma YIIaM u11a ML 1R.ai WNlIWmcx sane= "M m nL TR na®1 ern0m y�hi.r L.Y A saw mwc WML 9x11 aasm or Ll Sa Omwm a 0.F•.L p MI. ho YI-YFaI rw=rn1=® or rwsx a®4 sc D ut" L ra om uw)w wum =wu Tw5ft W Ws m ru Y LW.Aro6 afLlm n CM.Rlm L lama C=vmW.Ul<6on=YcalMm1 FUEL MART acwm m M?ww ra smm vlmm 0[m Wmw SED'a x3803-3EI13 �.,�.MID 1�K�pl.� CAR WASH !1 S BLOCK ..m vCOe a o[.om1e venal. - �p =s► L-----------je L mamoa 0na.aa s a WF�rn Ow wa 3801 STINSON BLVD. rpa loans FILL Yell coal affWa tan m mr FM r 0amasoll mK. FU"m MM mime Wn o[LLL FOR _ ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA @67AUADN v mm.a 55421 `ail ➢ r �— — r. ; 1. manna 9w auam a(e�a OWAClm)m 10 Ll *449 PROPOSED WILDING off " ;e4% m�lrale*a wu s lmaeaz ra�u wwnn+10%onyx FOR: p tb I FFE=960.50 saw L a nrm um".an,aam vrwa emm enlL ra HADI & ROGER- _T_ ----1_17 aFUq - . 1 , a11,s --- 0a rmvarr or ne osva.clY wa srl s onus.or an n[ ---- - - aolsm ABOU—MOURADI II i y IL MUTO OF s¢arwa 04AMOG sou RMLT r u WA 3813 STINSON BLVD, N.E. I ( sue alam m vw1 MM"aM=f.0AM4 Fm MA s H I ° ovuwa er W=m 0a 4w¢CM&m%wrs n[Fx c ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA L0 NO a1►.an 1R.n sWU s arz,.am m 1pMG m n[Sa w wen F. mn==onw 1a Irc ra um OF 55421 lmUraa MOM sanva: I. Imw m sm FLm Fa MW CAXV HMMA 0.oaoa ra i sm wwl. ILwvtoU1mFLm 1aYMImRXIWRYmvAmSINM PRELIMINARY ara (l.Srac I• , �I'' �' i i / wale as UV M.a dime ao saxnva SMU L •FLfYr:a II f' I. 11 ,Lsw orwmAKm Tw OF mom aam uc GRADING W aiw.vi® I �•i 1�� usm law ancw�st ' 11 DRAINAGE AND aCrrr Gruo ` p ��,a ° =�1`'` .� •'' EROSION CONTROL PLAN . e' s ..._ � '� •ice— —r� SO roa �� •... I ii IV IF a.. yam - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION s_. C5 1.a11■K=9wl aama%ma 9m ac al'.n.e9 Jae am Mal Q cu.10.41m■smL to aam 1=,90& r aa] KDm Ke al ms an MLaiR 1433-252-11Y L 03l0a0 914 TD 4964 M 1=ma W II1I1110a 01 CWM 646 91awstMI VW=W IVmwe 1faU0 Ma m 9rf O 9a aDaaR ni. ' am cm 914 C).w■N1 nc pum aoml a'M 1 1■DlCJ►s LKMR61aQ 099OWa 0­=a 1161 Rl91 KKVU "smlrn 1 wmmc O sm ww M a0 0 Q WNW Y.Oa■1nuC 0 a PY■■IIIa Jae■n 91 D4 WM m 91aa am.WM aal sL■L aR rn■919urno■l0191CO 1 KUM KW a10K■L =03AM 0 9MM am.•10/0 Ha wig/IY ��r T.h ahY►11at AL■L IClae 100.91 Q aa{■a®n190a MOOn,a:IWO 6 A h•L 101 Yl.• M YI-r-OYI 9004 P_Co"Q YIa■."W sw. 9'ml wln9 COl[ m omlc ua ymunc W■/orlon o 9T.wDa r■alan. a 0!110[10 9■L 161.6.m Cl■1"uw W 1004 IK K=W - gma Ia we a®Al K1 awl[awn Was W 92"90LL FUEL MART m.o■ ...■o,ac 1nD w"m mmm mwK 03803-3613 ; r"� Im 1 S BLOCK L IK m91e 9n6■oa 0900n 9161 a 9,aD■ICala J CAR WASH =__ �94aluloa 1 `--------_-J L 0e am MIT"„,,,V,1 LW sml:,mw/r.1„n 3801 STINSON BLVD. 0■Dna r=9I91Y WM LK"196 O■taa 99u 0:■a® ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA ■01 nc a7 mc=a my Jac a 9.m1 O.xi x"xm OL k- 55421 1 1X 1 r. WIN 10 alms Wria W U00 0XM ew r0=W 9.0 1 I>i vw W albm6 ca sons I �'I PROPOSED BUDDING lavall�m 9a■.w ml Imo O/0m1I..alsorta SR O1D60a■e vCrc Iw rnoel „~-1• . 9- I fFE=960.50 , u aa/m 9w1 a aa>AL'lsn■K4awla m nc aas wm H A D I & ROGER. 1 FFE=981.17 T anal 0 9WMa 94an.ma W OM IUM W/0 994 MWC ®° ABOU-MOURAD m Dame PA c 0: $nom c ms 09u■C n[Epmnm.910L K9u W■uAe n4wa Iwa n[°"�a°oti®""°"• 3813 STINSON BLVD, N.E. ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA °r�■1 _ I� j atawe mYa a a r om 9w1 a wa■Kmmaa.n 55421 �,.as m.,=m on9oe �" Iw9 as swag Ylml SIM LII am161.�e �.c 1Wm1 Z3 6on w"` 1 M0 m C19@ Kn ) M0 m ai61Ac901 i w '1 - i i /afiw w� E m I : i Ecru. azn "°"" 'I -----b PRELIMINARY. UTILITY PLAN ———— ———— lip is � II -- .. - II - - y,•,,; el/a Oe.v 1/}1/m _ sear I•.1D' C • •y NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ... C 6 01 Cif L—VAK PA�3101MAL oa.o..s tln IIR 0"M nlcmmOne CamC.R . - .u...a+la., ,_,n• ra p1Y0t011Y0RLL mnea Uwe Funxn9 ..It.11w e.a ,_�/; w cexsnurno0 mvlcn ;, 1 Yu/�W �r M tl11�ntl I t h.L 101 YII. h.tl1tiY-Ctll I y � x19D.m0 ,mom 9F®m w Y �F FUEL MART r wal alrt i 03803-3813 i o m�eeo � Dior' ,r ,m 1 S BLOCK I 1 CAR WASH i BLDG. 1 3801 STINSON BLVD. OCK+� ! �Tiru ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 55421 mom mic. sl to C flm J '.PROPOSEO.BOOBOIO Fos: wxm M960.50 HADI & ROGER- u rFE=961.17. - ABOU—MOURAD n n V I "� uxowPF Fuxmlc xorzs 3813 STINSON BLVD, N.E. t 1. U097H m.m/n0.9W VW 0<9rt lam m 96m16 9G m ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA FUTIJRE E%PAHSIO9 am.F rxnwl■w 9rt mrm9la 9c wmart ma.lnw 9WL MADMOOD !I s f a r �o 7 ! am.e m amc of �m�'0a�mom.`�.rt ITSImrwa�maK 55421 Olm ' 9 :�:or flrw) a l II 0 it P l0 1 "KW Ymw ll u COW -TOT lK AbCVw ASTOO" 1 0 9'..Ow wouff"m m 1 9wl a 0 91WI 9mR F�Ml MIM ora MAM•a im nc K� 9a00m OTC p-L 9c rw� L p 9w1 m.9.. emu 00/ MG WwY010."t-r OV IWmTTOO)9MOm PRELIMINARY I —0mc=a"I.Q09.EuxFla= Ofm""o9W BE � waa n mF-1/!\49Csrnwoc LANDSCAPE • .. :, ,••�••_�•• W.1 Gva 9w1 a u.l.101 m mmtl[mnc Ubm ' `% w ..v CNOK.lL a[9'.9IDt0 10 AlWfl..1 uN(C(5/AI IOIP/M 6 OF __ — PLAN mma vwrtn oosOC mFn '• wr-.t I I, � ou.lc m�a+oa+ot 1 9au a ve NI > ..Tw In c I a - - V I F.e.w: Imu me FnF/ou _ s..r 1•.10' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ®1 �1 rumen urrBroervo - - arracnraTY.St.V= ou°nanauc cw°rwrnoa amrM l.i. '11�— FUEL MART i -- --, r--- CAR WASH I I 3801 STINSON BLVD. I I ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA ro,1 lo,I GAR WASrI i o a� 55421 OA DL I TUNNEL -- --J L--- roa: r4 r w-v HADI & ROGER ABOU—MOURAD, n4 r,�- ff4 � 'I ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA c.' BOILER WA511 EQUIPMENT ELECTRICAL 55421 w c4 ROOM ROOM ROOM La , II Ki � 11 � ' PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN =7 FUTURE EX�ANSI^Pv 30'-0' x 108'-8" II -------------------- I = _ MIS n FLOOR PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �.� Al - 2{IJl-YM T4 Ialn1 1M6Y fJl,0'Y 0000 f/IOI. �1RrrTi[0 TY GV _ CO'Irt A LOIOI 1!L 645 fR IIIO 1118 � I4YG:G IO NIG IaYL� CR OrGPfiN110 141[f/Om1Y r(aa MlrmrJrG IKRIRTit{ pvp�ll�r}LL�Q11C0 CAR WASH cnNco rnlaurnon Gevlco 4 h.L 101 YIU r...Yl-rf-eYl FUEL MART CAR WASH 3801 STINSON BLVD. I o7. W ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA ------- ------ -- -- - ---- - -- ------ - - - -- ----- ---- 55421 NORTH ELEVATION Goa FOR: HADI & ROGER' �,.�. ABOU-MOURAD' 3813 STINSON BLVD, N.E. 00➢f171 ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 55421 � 1 = ! ........._...... ........_......... ._T.................. — .......__........=.... --... _............_....-._ 0':—Y:1.._1.0_1..-..._T..._-....T..._+....�_..L...._........_...................... ..............._... _ PRELIMINARY --------------- -- ELEVATIONS -..-- ... - " . . SOUTH ELEVATION fl T-MM KIX Il'AI IYCS- ftR Kln aY 1•V11C afrd' O0rK1f1 001101 F GSOf MJfla 10 Niel 11YL WI 1RIJ IY UK- a0.r+t1 xan ralQ n1r u arnn YYOt ..........__. ...—_...............................__....—...... eau r aau—----------- . au Haul .r...T...._ ....... T._ o ...._....._....;_..._.._ ... la'47t,10-011 i--•-y � � �,rY!n� —_ _ __ ___— 60'1,IP-0T __—_ 0n 0001 .—.— Yf11 ..�• OR aCOI C � J a.•cur ck ll ml. :4P fi MAD 14K 'NEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NOT FOR CONVRUMON n n �� A2 #3803-3813 i 1 S BLOCK • — — — i BLDG. HAPL E PINE PANE "IL E Aso' I _ _-,.,._- --------------- --------- --- -------- SOD DISTURBED AREAS III III � arm-, ASk III = 6W( 5 :BOI�.I�kNG: a III I -FFE=960.50 I III III �y E - ' • . . III � s �t.�. :� ��1*E���9�1:1���• III III I � z � Y III NY, � h UD Lc III SOD Q III III m :FUTURE EXPANSION �� cn Co III III SOD ¢ i o EDGE OF BITUMINOUS �m w III III , Q III ° • ��y a III � III � Fo Ln CD co III III � . III j ' , CD �� ��� _ __--- --- SOD DISTURBED AREAS — -- -- -- -- --_— 1 CD III ( MAPLE `\j MARL E J — vYsr U MAPLE MAPLE III III � III 8 t1 fl FT. IV S III m III io H x �ll�L Jf%fF C24P AWSff co CD w SITS,pf" HADI & ROGER Mai STfiYSONlyL�'D. ABOU—MOURAD sT A*TffoAT, cn 3813 STIHSON BLVD, N.E. WYY SOTA .5N21 cD ST. ANTHONY. MINNESOTA 55421 H -oW.14 a821 ioa Ago— faL 8u�w-vra� ac w., nr 00114 nz est-doo-am — cr ■ — . 0 1'� 1 • 1 ' ' 1 ' 1 •� ' �• i 111 1 • • • • • up • X1!1 !1 !1 1 CD IS 11 li _i- � 1 1 1 1 1111 11 11 1 _ � 111 11 11 1 1111 11 11 1 ili li li i lili li li i 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 111 11 11 1 111 11 11 1 1111 11 11 1 win 11 1 1 1, 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 j ' Ijl jl jl 1 1111 11 11 1 E 1 111 11 11 1 �I�I �1 �1 1 w. , � 1 111 I j I j j 111 11 11 1 1. 1. 1 111 11 11 1 1111 11 11 1 111 11 11 1 111 11 li 1_ ,: 1111 11 11 1 111 1! 11 1 111 11 11 1 1111 11 11 1 111 11 11 1 1111 11 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 111 11 If 1., _ 1111 11 11 1 ` 111 11 11 1 :_.•� 1111 11 11 1 _ \ 111 !1 11 1,; ,; 111 !1 11 1`:..,��'`'' 1111 11 11 ! � � � 111 11 11 1 1111 11 11 1 .. ♦ _ Ijl jl jl 1 �1�1 �1 �1 1 1 11 11 1 111 11 11 1 111 11 11 1 11� 11 1 111 11 11 1 111 11 11 1 11�. 1• 11 1 � 111 11 11 1 111 11 11 1 1111 11 11 1 - 111 11 11 1 111 11 11 1 11.1 ■1 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1' 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1� _ _•1• !1 !1 i iii �i �i i �i-�i i f 1 111 11 li 1 �� 11 1 ili li li i lili li li e 1 �1 ili li li i �1-�1 1 - 111 11 11 1 - Ilj _ 11 1 �i i �i 1.1 .1 .1 1 .1.1 .1 .1 1 #3803-3813 I 1 S BLACK r -h m v o i BLDG. --- I - I /taP[C � PI/F v/uPL SazY " SOD DISTURBED AREAS T d , ' : PROWQSR�,BU1LDrNG z e II *t� II II �t s� SOD �aa II I m &ms nYt I _ FUTURE EXPANSION II II I °o ��{�e�p4sx r°�r' •c EDGE OF BITUMINOUS n � y p q r�tt`rdd + t Fl —1 m/ II IIx '!-t "�'t `�',.i y Fr ."'altiiyt+ = rS} +' '4raiF �^ Y?tit a'^ �FJ C fr 11 t� s-C>,.. d�' S t N 1 II II � , �� x�� ��t n•Z^r�y �'�'R�,���fJ V�'°�F .:i "` �, ° � , f ..,lx f n y\� ,�� �-s �;r. � c, �,t ,� '�' lEy.ad `� n��,i�7'�•.y sb�...�x�},.s v�.. � ` _ �"� III� 1 � �'�. �� .r�-a. ,..a .,aYy.� i';�s'{• ..1�,9:. '' !-:�v''�" r 't-e�� �.t4;� _.�-7 � 1 ` --- �t \ _—__ SOD DISTURBED AREAS _ . .r II � II IN II tN II tN 3 B th 4 Yh: Ar �I MCALE.1 II �'l f ART Cff #4 ff .STTB PL�iV HADI & ROGER seal sms°,vai�o. Aa.B urlxU o rt.MImOUR AD , NG'�YN6 S�aT/O5r5�/2/ Nv--s� �-m- .S.... imr/s mro �'Fags -. ----------- ------------ ---- ---------------------- CI w ILI,.y_ '- = _ - V V • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY RESOLUTION 00-060 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 3813 STINSON BOULEVARD WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission to consider a request for a conditional use permit for a Fuel Mart Car Wash to be located at 3813 Stinson Boulevard; and WHEREAS, Following due consideration, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that in agreement with the findings of the Planning Commission at their July 18, 2000 meeting, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves the request for a conditional use permit at 3813 Stinson Boulevard. Adopted this day of 2000. • Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed by Administration: City Manager • AL 8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350 B.A.Mittelsu WSB Minneapolis, MN 55426 Bret A.Wring, Peter R.Willenbring,P.E. • Donald W.Sterna,P.E. tel: 763-541-4800 Ronald B.Bray,P.E. &Associates, Inc. fax: 763-541-1700 July 18, 2000 Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o Michael Morrison, City Manager City of St Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 Re: Pahl Avenue Purchase & Removal of Houses City of St. Anthony, MN WSB Project No. 1065-271 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Bids were received for the above-referenced project on July 17, 2000 and were opened and read aloud. A total of three bids were received. Please find enclosed the bid tabulation • indicating the.high bidder as Otting House Movers, Lakeville, MN for a total amount of $11,200.00. We recommend sale of 2700 and 2704 Pahl Avenue to Otting House Movers for the amount indicated above. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Todd E._Hubmer,-P.E. Project Manager Enclosures c: Otting House Movers nm • M i n n e a p o l l s ° S t . C i'{&W$11lQdS-27ISp.eUi..seRemavaArecmmdn-alts-hmc.wpd Infrastructure Engineers Planners EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 73 • BID TABULATION Pahl Avenue Purchase and Removal of Houses City of St.Anthony, Hennepin County, Minnesota WSB Project No. 1065-271 Bids Opened: July 17,2000 2700 Pahl 2704 Pahl 2713 Pahl 2809 30th Contractor Avenue Avenue Avenue Avenue Total Otting House Movers $3,600.00 $7,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11,200.00 Prodger Housemovers $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,000.00 'Semple Building Movers" $100.00. $0.00 .$150.00 $0.00 $250.00 r " Bid Rejected-Contractor stipulated conditions I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on July 17, 2000. Cif �J6` Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. • F:\wpwin\1065-27\Excel\Bidtab.xls\House Removal Bid Tab e4 CITY OF ST.ANTHONY HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 00- 0 6 3 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SALE OF HOMES FOR RELOCATION WHEREAS, as a part of the City of St.Anthony flood mitigation program, the engineering firm of WSB&Associates,Inc.,recommended properties be purchased by the City and the structures on said properties be relocated; and WHEREAS, two of said properties,2700 and 2704 Pahl Avenue,have been purchased by the City and bids for sale and relocation of the structures located on said property have been sought, received, and reviewed. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of St.Anthony hereby_. approves the sale and relocation of the structure located.at 2700 and 2704 Pahl Avenue and awards the . sale of said properties to Offing House Movers in the amount of$11,200.00,which bid is deemed to be in the best interests of the City. Adopted this day of , 2000. Dennis Cavanaugh,Mayor ATTEST: Connie Kroeplin, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: Michael Mornson, City Manager • FAWPWIM1065-27TSpec\House RemovaAresoludon.wpd 8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350 B.A.Mittelste: WSB - Minneapolis, MN 55426 Bret A.We...., Peter R.Vdillenbring,P.E. Donald W.Sterna,P.E. tel: 763-541-4800 Ronald B.Bray,P.E. &Associates, Inc. fax: 763-541-1700 July 18, 2000 Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o Michael Morrison City Manager City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 Re: Pahl Avenue Pond Construction City of St. Anthony, MN WSB Project No. 1065-271 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Bids were received for the above-referenced project on July 17, 2000 and were opened and read aloud. .A total of eight bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical • accuracy and tabulated. Please find enclosed the bid tabulation indicating the low bidder as G. L. Contracting, Inc., Medina, MN in the following amounts: Base Bid $55,982.00 Base Bid + Alternate No. 1 $79,782.00 We recommend award of the contract to G. L. Contracting, Inc. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures c: G. L. Contracting, Inc. nrn M i n n e a p o l is S t C l F6WVV iV065-2A47=lEuavationl-w—dnalu-hmc.wpd Infrastructure Engineers Planners EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 76 BID TABULATION Pahl Avenue Pond Construction City of St.Anthony, Hennepin County, Minnesota WSB Project No. 1065-271 Bids Opened: July 17,2000 Denotes corrected Base Bid+ Contractor figure Bid Security Base Bid Alternate No. 1 G L Contracting Inc X $55,982.00 $79,782.00 Land Recycling Svc Inc X $55,192.50 $81,984.50 Doboszenski & Sons Inc ** X $62,300.00 $84,300.00 ® _ Arnt Constr Co Inc ** X $62,803.00 $96,803.00 Don Zappa & Son Inc ** X $66,673.00 $97,633.00 Rybak Exc& Contracting X $75,524.00 $101,524.00 Jay Bros Inc X $117,700.00 $177,700.00 Landworx Excavating Invalid Bid - No Bid Security $48,001.57 $65,103.57 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on July 17, 2000. Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. Extension of Bids WSB Project: Pahl Avenue Pond Construction Project Location: City of St.Anthony,Hennepin County,Minnesota Checked By:N.Marshall Project Nos: WSB Project No.1065-271 Date: 07/17/00 Denotes corrected figure Low Bidder 2nd Low Bidder 3rd Low Bidder 4th Low Bidder Base Bid $55,982.00 $55,192.50 $62,300.00 $62,803.00 Base Bid+Alternate No.1 $79,782.00 $81,984.50 $84,300.00 $96,803.00 G L Contracting Inc Land Recycling Svc Inc Doboszenski&Sons Inc Arnt Constr Co Inc Line Item Estimated Unit Estimated Unit Unit Unit No. Number Description Unit Quantity Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Surface Improvements-Base Bid Addendum No.1 not acknowledged 1 2021.501 Mobilization(2%Max) Lump Sum 1.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $800.00 $800.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,070.00 $1,070.00 2 2101.502 Clear Trees Each 12.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 $225.00 $2,700.00 $175.00 $2,100.00 $175.00 $2,100.00 3 2101.507 Grub Trees Each 12.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 $175.00 $2,100.00 $50.00 $600.00 4 2503.541 15"RC Pipe Design 3006 Class V LF 42.00 $52.00 $2,184.00 $66.50 $2,793.001 $35.00 $1,470.00 $62.00 $2,604.00 5 2506.602 Furnish&Install 15"RCP Apron w/Trash Guard Each 2.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $865.50 $1,731.00 $690.00 $1,380.00 $1,475.00 $2,950.00 6 DIV 2 Foundation Removal and Site Clearance Each 4.00 $750.00 $3,000.00 $1,800.00 $7,200.00 $1,800.00 $7,200.00 $3,025.00 $12,100.00 7 DIV 2 Disconnect and Remove Utilities Each 4.00 $1,850.00 $7,400.00 $450.00 $1,800.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 8 DIV 2 Pond Excavation CY 4,700.00 $7.59 $35,673.00 $7.52 $35,344.00 $8.50 $39,950.00 $7.32 $34,404.00 9 DIV 2 Seeding(Incl.Topsoil,Mulch&Fertilizer) Acre 0.75 $1,500.00 $1,125.00 $2,166.00 $1,624.501 $1,200.00 $900.001 $2,900.00 $2,175.00 Total Base Bid $55,982.00 1 $55,192.50 $62,300.00 $62,803.00 G L Contracting Inc Land Recycling Svc Inc Doboszenski&Sons Inc Arnt Constr Co Inc Line Item Estimated Unit Estimated Unit Unit Unit No. Number Description Unit Quantity Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Alternate No.1 -Demolition of Building 10 1 DIV 2 1 Building Demolition �E�ach4.00 $5,950.00 $23,800.00 $6,698.00 $26,792.00 $5,500.00 $22,000.00 $8,500.00 $34,000.00 Total Alternate No.1 1 $23,800.00 1 1 $26,792.0011 1 $22,000.0011 1 $34,000.00 Total Base Bid+Alternate No.1 $79,782.00 $81,984.50 $84,300.00 $96,803.00 F:\Wpwin\1065-27\Excel\Bidtab.xis Page 1 of 3 Extension of Bids 0 WSB Project., Pahl Avenue Pond Construction Project Location: City of St.Anthony,Hennepin County,Minnesota Checked By.N.Marshall Project Nos: WSB Project No.1065-271 Date: 07/17/00 1 Denotes corrected figure Low Bidder 5th Low Bidder 6th Low Bidder 7th Low Bidder Base Bid $55,982.00 $66,673.00 $75,524.00 $117,700.00 Base Bid+Alternate No.1 $79,782.00 $97,633.00 $101,524.00 $177,700.00 G L Contracting Inc Don Zappa&Son Inc Rybak Exc&Contracting Jay Bros Inc Line Item Estimated Unit Estimated Unit Unit Unit No. Number Description Unit Quantity Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Surface Improvements-Base Bid 1 2021.501 Mobilization(2%Max) Lump Sum 1.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,360.00 $2,360.00 2 2101.502 Clear Trees Each 12.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 $180.00 $2,160.00 $125.00 $1,500.00 $300.00 $3,600.00 3 2101.507 Grub Trees Each 12.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 $180.00 $2,160.00 $120.00 $1,440.00 $300.00 $3,600.00 4 2503.541 15"RC Pipe Design 3006 Class V LF 42.00 $52.00 $2,184.00 $40.00 $1,680.00 $40.00 $1,680.00 $50.00 $2,100.00 5 2506.602 Furnish&Install 15"RCP Apron w/Trash Guard Each 2.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $925.00 $1,850.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $675.00 $1,350.00 6 DIV 2 Foundation Removal and Site Clearance Each 4.00 $750.00 $3,000.00 $2,166.00 $8,664.00 $1,250.00 $5,000.00 $11,500.00 $46,000.00 7 DIV 2 Disconnect and Remove Utilities Each 4.00 $1,850.00 $7,400.00 $600.00 $2,400.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $2,700.00 $10,800.00 8 DIV 2 Pond Excavation CY 4,700.00 1 $7.59 $35,673.00 $8.15 $38,305.00 $12.32 $57,904.00 $9.95 $46,765.00 9 DIV 2 Seeding(Incl.Topsoil,Mulch&Fertilizer) Acre 0.75 $1,500.00 $1,125.00 $10,872.00 $8,154.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,125.00 Total Base Bid $55,982.00 $66,673.00 $75,524.00 $117,700.00 G L Contracting Inc Don Zappa&Son Inc Rybak Exc&Contracting Jay Bros Inc Line Item Estimated Unit Estimated Unit Unit Unit No. Number Description Unit Quantity Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Alternate No.1 -Demolition of Building 10 DIV 2 1 Building Demolition Each 4.00 $5,950.00 $23.800.001 $7,740.00 $30,960.00 $6,500.00 $26,000.00 .$15,000.00 $60,000.00 Total Alternate No.1 $23,800.00 $30,960.0011 $26,000.00 $60,000.00 Total Base Bid+Alternate No.1 JE $79,782.00 $97,633.00 $101,524.00 $177,700.00 F:\Wpwin\1065-27\Excel\Bidtab.xis Page 2 of 3 Extension of Bids WSB Project: Pahl Avenue Pond Construction Project Location: City of St.Anthony,Hennepin County,Minnesota Checked By:N.Marshall Project Nos: WSB Project No.1065-271 Date: 07/17/00 Denotes corrected figure Low Bidder Bid Rejcted-No Bid Security Provided Base Bid $55,982.00 $48,001.57 Base Bid+Alternate No.1 $79,782.00 $65,103.57 G L Contracting Inc Landworx Excavating Line Item Estimated Unit Estimated Unit No. Number Description Unit Quantity Price Cost Price Cost Surface Improvements-Base Bid 1 2021.501 Mobilization(2%Max) Lump Sum 1.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $750.00 $750.00 2 2101.502 Clear Trees Each 12.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 3 2101.507 Grub Trees Each 12.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 4 2503.541 15"RC Pipe Design 3006 Class V LF 42.00 $52.00 $2,184.00 $86.23 $3,621.60 5 2506.602 Fumish&Install 15"RCP Apron w/Trash Guard Each 2.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,035.00 $2,070.00 6 DIV 2 Foundation Removal and Site Clearance Each 4.00 $750.00 $3,000.00 $1,839.99 $7,359.97 7 DIV 2 Disconnect and Remove Utilities Each 4.00 $1,850.00 $7,400.00 $125.00 $500.00 8 DIV 2 Pond Excavation CY 4,700.00 $7.59 $35,673.00 $6.50 $30,550.00 9 DIV ISeeding(Incl.Topsoil,Mulch&Fertilizer) Acre 0.75 $1,500.00 $1,125.00 $1,000.00 $750.00 Total Base Bid $55,982.00 $48,001.57 G L Contracting Inc Landworx Excavating Line Item Estimated Unit Estimated Unit No. Number Description Unit Quantity Price Cost Price Cost Alternate No.1 -Demolition of Building 10 DIV 2 Building Demolition Each 4.00 $5,950.00 $23,800.00 $4,275.50 $17,102.00 Total Alternate No.1 $23,800.00 $17,102.00 Total Base Bid+Alternate No.1 $79,78270 $65,103.57 F:\Wpwin\1065-27\Excel\Bidtab.xls Page 3 of 3 so CITY OF ST. ANTHONY HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 00-.0 6 4 A RESOLUTION APPROVING DEMOLITION.OF PROPERTY AND AWARDING BID FOR DEMOLITION AND POND CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, as a part of the City of St. Anthony flood mitigation program, the engineering firm of WSB &Associates,Inc.,recommended properties be purchased by the City and the structures on said properties be demolished; and WHEREAS, two of said properties,2713 Pahl Avenue and 2809 30'b Avenue have been purchased by the City and bids for demolition of the structure and construction of ponds located on said property have been sought,received, and reviewed. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of St.Anthony hereby approves the demolition of the structures located at 2713 Pahl Avenue and 2809 30'Avenue and awards the bid for said demolition and pond construction to G. L. Contracting, Inc., at a cost of$67,882.00, which bid is deemed to be in the best interests of the City. Adopted this day of ) 2000. Dennis Cavanaugh,Mayor ATTEST: Connie Kroeplin,City Clerk Reviewed for administration: Michael Morrison, City Manager • F:\WP WIN\1066-27\Spec\Eseavadon\reeoludon.wpd A 8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350 B.A.Mittelstea �l WSB - Minneapolis, MN 55426 Bret A.Wei:_,_. Peter R.Willenbring,P.E. Donald W.Sterna,P.E. tel: 763-541-4800 Ronald B.Bray,P.E. &Associates, Inc. fax: 763-541-1700 July 20, 2000 Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff c/o Mr. Michael Morrison City of St Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 Re: Funding Recommendations for the City of St. Anthony 1999 Flood Relief Grant Program WSB Project No. 1065-362 Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff: The City received a total of four applications to participate in the 2000 Flood Relief Grant Program. Each applicant was contacted either by phone or in person to discuss the water problems they have experienced, and to determine their eligibility-for participation' in the Flood Relief Grant Program. The primary source of water entering the home for all applicants was through the foundation,floor and walls. Upon review of the problem it was recommended that the applicant install basement drain tile systems and/or provide positive drainage away from the walls and foundation of the home. These activities are currently not funded by the Flood Proofing Grant Program. Therefore, all of the applications received in 2000 have not met the qualifying criteria for participation in the program. If you have any questions, please call me at(612) 541-4800. Sincerely, WSB &Associates,Inc. Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. Project Manager rim • M i n n e a p o l i s • S t C l o u d F:\WPWlN\1065-36\072000-mm.wpd Infrastructure Engineers Planners EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350 B.A.Mittelsteac WSB � Minneapolis, MN 55426 Bret A.Weiss,P.;r. Peter R.Willenbring,P.E. Donald W.Sterna,P.E. • tel: 763-541-4800 Ronald B.Bray,P.E. &Associates, Inc. fax: 763-541-1700 July 20, 2000 Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff c/o Michael Morrison, City Manager City of St Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 Re: Review of Silver Lake West Evaluation Report WSB 1065.01 Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff: As requested, we have completed our review of the Silver Lake West Evaluation Report dated May 11, 2000. This report was completed by the Ramsey County Public Works Lake • Management Program in cooperation with the Silver Lake West Homeowner's Association and the Rice Creek Watershed District. The objectives of this study were to: • Monitor the inflow to Silver Lake to determine nutrient and water loads • Measure in-lake water quality during the growing season • Evaluate lake management activities to improve water quality • Facilitate the prioritization and implementation of lake management activities The watershed of Silver Lake is 629 acres in size and is broken up into 10 subwatersheds. Six inlets and outlets within the watershed were monitored*in 1999 for volume of water, total phosphorous, and total suspended solids. The Lake itself was also monitored in two locations at four depths for phosphorous content, secchi depth, chlorophyll a content,,and the'presence of . phytoplantkon and zooplankton. The results of the study indicated that the total phosphorous and total suspended solids loading is very high to Silver Lake West. Results indicated that the Lake has a very high nutrient and solids content. The major phosphorous and suspended solids contributor to the Lake is the Stinson subwatershed. This subwatershed is also the largest (192.8 acres). The second largest pollutant contributor to the Lake is the 42nd Street subwatershed (82.1 acres), although this watershed is smaller than the Apache subwatershed. The Apache subwatershed has the second M i n n e a p o l i s • S t C 1 o u d FAWPWM106M1\072000hmc.wpd Infrastructure Engineers Planners EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 83 Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff c/o Michael Morrison, City Manager City of St Anthony July 20, 2000 Page 2 largest drainage area at 132 acres. Direct Runoff from land adjacent to Silver Lake and the Apache subwatersheds are the 3`d and 4' largest pollutant contributors. The study shows that water quality of Silver Lake West has improved between 1986-1999. The report indicates that this can be attributed to a variety of factors, including the ponding improvements within the Apache subwatershed and the treatment ponds constructed in the northern portion of the watershed. While the water quality of the Lake has generally improved over the past 13 years, the water quality is still poor. The report provides recommendations for the future management of the Lake. These recommendations include evaluating and implementing Best Management Practices in the watershed, sweeping streets,public,education programs,pond maintenance, evaluating the use of lakescaping techniques along the shore, and continued monitoring. The complete listing of recommendations is included with this letter for your review. This concludes our review of this study. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free • to contact me at (763) 277-5782. Sincerely, WSB &Associates, Inc. Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. Project Manager attachment am • F:\WPW A1065-01\072000hmc.wpd 84 RECOMMENDATIONS • The project results have identified several lake management activities for Silver Lake West. Future meetings and discussions should address the priority of these and other activities, as well as implementation roles and funding sources. Watershed Management • Identify possible ponding locations for untreated portions within the Stinson, 42nd St. and Apache subwatersheds. • Evaluate current Best Management Practices by cities and other local agencies including street sweeping methods and frequency and catch basin cleaning • Implement Best Management Practices in accordance with the Rice Creek Watershed District rules including infiltration practices to reduce water and pollutant loads to the lake o Ensure implementation of maintenance agreements with commercial property owners for pond cleaning, litter removal and impervious surface cleaning • Maintain ponds developed by Ramsey County and others. Shoreline and Aquatic Plant Management • Conduct shoreline survey to identify current landscaping practices and identify areas of sediment deposition, erosion or other problems • Evaluate potential lakescaping and erosion control opportunities • Map aquatic plants 2 times during 2000 • • Evaluate plant management options to provide a more diverse native plant community Fisheries Management and Lake Use • Evaluate results of 2000 fish population assessment and proposed DNR fisheries management plan, including stocking, in order to maximize water. quality as well as recreational impacts • Operate aeration system each winter as indicated by dissolved oxygen monitoring • Conduct a lake use survey to determine the types and extent of current lake uses Public Education • Convey the results of this project to residents within the watershed and local government staff • Develop an education program.to repetitively communicate basic messages regarding Silver Lake West and beneficial housekeeping Best Management Practices Lake Water Quality Monitoring • Continue annual water quality monitoring 17 L X. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. Resolution 00-061 B. Resolution 00-062 85 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Michael Morrison, City Manager FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE: . July 19, 2000 RE: Establishment of TIF District No. 5 At its meeting on July 25' the St. Anthony HRA and the St. Anthony City Council will be considering the elimination of certain parcels from the existing Apache Plaza tax increment financing district and the establishment of a new tax increment financing district containing these parcels. The new tax increment financing district is proposed to include the tax parcels which contain Apache Plaza Shopping Center, and the adjacent property consisting of the site of the former New Market store and the Taco Bell. Since a portion of these parcels are presently included in a tax increment financing district established by the HRA in 1992 it will be necessary to remove these parcels • from the existing tax increment financing district prior to including them in the new tax increment financing district. The tax increment financing plan for the new tax increment financing district authorizes the expenditure of tax increment revenue to be derived from the district to pay costs related to the redevelopment of the property in the district. Such tax increment may be used to pay such costs directly, to pay debt service on bonds issued to finance such expenditures or to reimburse the redeveloper of the property for payment of such redevelopment costs. It is important to note that by the approval of the tax increment financing plan is not a commitment by the City or HRA to provide tax increment financing assistance for the redevelopment of Apache Plaza Shopping Center. Such commitment requires a further action of the HRA approving the execution of a redevelopment agreement with the redeveloper of such property under which agreement the HRA agrees to provide tax increment assistance for the redevelopment of the shopping center to the redeveloper. The HRA is not being asked to take such action on July 25`h The tax increment financing plan to be considered by the HRA and City Council provides the new tax increment financing district is a"redevelopment district" under the TIF Act. The basis for this determination is the report as to the condition of buildings in the district prepared by an outside consultant. This report is attached as an exhibit to the financing plan. • DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 86 The financing plan also includes estimates of costs,bonded indebtedness to be incurred, increment to be produced and duration of the district. This information is required to be contained in the financing plan by the TIF Act. The financing plan provides that the City elects to make a"qualifying local contribution" with respect to the new tax increment financing district. Since the district is a redevelopment district the qualifying local contribution is 5% of the increment. By making this election the option is preserved that if such contribution is made to the redevelopment of the shopping center by the City or HRA from other than tax increment funds, the City will avoid a reduction in state aid as a result of the district. At the present time it is proposed that the HRA apply funds to pay a portion of the cost of the storm sewer improvements. The adoption of the financing plan does not commit the HRA to provide such funds. Such commitment would be made in the redevelopment agreement with the redeveloper of the shopping center. A draft of the tax increment financing plan was provided to the St. Anthony School District and Ramsey County 30 days prior to the July 25'public hearing for their review and comment as required by the TIF Act. JPG:cmn • -2- DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP AMENDMENT TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 -RAMSEY COUNTY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA APPROVED JULY 25,2000 88 I. INTRODUCTION The Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony, Minnesota(the "HRA") and the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota(the "City"), have previously approved a tax increment financing plan designated as the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-Ramsey County (the"Financing Plan")which establishes a tax increment financing district designated as Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-Ramsey County (the "District"). Certain property in the District has not as yet been redeveloped in a manner which meets the objectives and purposes of the Financing Plan. In order to provide for the redevelopment of such property the HRA desires to eliminate such property from the District and include such property in a new tax increment financing district to be established by the HRA. The parcels to be eliminated from the District are identified in Exhibit A hereto (the "Eliminated Parcels"). By this Amendment, the Commissioners of the HRA eliminate the Eliminated-Parcels from the District. This Amendment is approved by the Commissioners of the HRA and the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4. II. AMENDMENT TO FINANCING PLAN The Financing Plan is hereby amended to reduce the geographic area of the District by eliminating the Eliminated Parcels from the District. III. FISCAL AND ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF ELIMINATION OF ELIMINATED PARCELS FROM DISTRICT Upon their elimination from the District the Eliminated Parcels will be included in anew tax increment financing district to be established by the HRA. The estimated fiscal and economic implication of the elimination of the Eliminated Parcels from the District and inclusion of such Eliminated Parcels in such new tax increment financing district is set forth in the tax increment financing plan of the HRA for such District which is entitled"Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-Ramsey County," which provisions are by reference incorporated herein. IV. DETERMINATIONS IN ORIGINAL FINANCING PLAN The determinations made in the Financing Plan with respect to designation of the District as a Redevelopment District, the impact of the establishment of the District and the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan (as defined in the Financing Plan) and undertaking of the Redevelopment Project(as defined in the Financing Plan) and the captured tax capacity of the District upon the redevelopment thereof are not affected by this Amendment and such determinations remain in full force and effect following the adoption of this Amendment. 89 • V. ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS TO PLAN The City and the HRA reserve the right to further amend or modify the Financing Plan by their joint action, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. VI. ORIGINAL FINANCING PLAN The Financing Plan, except to the extent provisions thereof have previously been explicitly amended or supplemented and are explicitly amended or supplemented by this Amendment shall remain in and be in full force and effect. • • -2- 90 • EXHIBIT A ELIMINATED PARCELS The Parcels containing the following-property identification numbers: 31-30-23-33-0002 31-30-23-34-0015 31-30-23-34-0016 • • A-1 91 • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 00-- 061 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3-RAMSEY COUNTY, AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of St. Anthony (the "HRA") and this Council by resolutions adopted August 25, 1992 approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3-Ramsey County (the "Original Redevelopment Plan"), and a redevelopment project as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 14, to be undertaken pursuant thereto, designated as Redevelopment • Project No. 3-Ramsey County(the "Original Redevelopment Project"); and on March 23, 1993,.the HRA and the City Council approved amendments to the Original Redevelopment Plan and Original Redevelopment Project (the Original Redevelopment Plan as so amended is herein called the "Redevelopment Plan" and the Original Redevelopment Project as so amended is herein called the "Redevelopment Project"). In order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, the HRA has approved a tax increment financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, designated as Tax Increment Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-Ramsey County(the "Financing Plan"), which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, designated as Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-Ramsey County (the"District"). The HRA has requested that this Council approve an amendment to the Financing Plan following a public hearing thereon to reduce the geographic area of the District by eliminating certain parcels therefor. The HRA has furnished to this Council a copy of the Amendment to the Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-Ramsey County (the "Amendment to the Financing Plan'), and this Council on July 25, 2000, held a public hearing on the same after notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City, not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. All persons desiring to be heard were heard. 2. The Amendment to the Financing Plan is hereby approved. 3. This Council has previously found that the District is a redevelopment district • within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10,on the basis that there is reasonably distributed throughout the District the following conditions: (i) parcels consisting of 70% of 92 the area in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and (ii) more than 50% of the buildings (not including outbuildings) are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. The Amendment to the Financing Plan does not change such prior findings of the Council. 4. Based upon the reasons and supporting facts set forth in the Original Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, this Council has hereby found that: (A) For reasons stated in Section 3 of this Resolution, the District is a Redevelopment District as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10. (B)The proposed redevelopment to be undertaken in accordance with the Original Redevelopment Plan in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. (C) The Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. (D)The Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the. sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the District by private enterprise. (E)The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 3,clause (a). The Amendment to the Financing Plan does not change such prior findings of this Council. Passed by the Council this 25'day of July, 2000. Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Manager • -2- - 93 • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the City Clerk. • -3- 94 2000-1 AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 3-RAMSEY COUNTY and TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5-RAMSEY COUNTY July 25, 2000 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA • 95 TABLE OF CONTENTS This Table of Contents is for convenience only and is not part of the Redevelopment Plan or the Tax.Increment Financing Plan. Page I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A. Statement of Need and Statutory Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II 2000-1 AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 A. Statement of Need . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 3 B. Statement of Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 C. Inclusion of Additional Property in Area Subject to Redevelopment Plan; Undertaking of Redevelopment Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5-RAMSEY COUNTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 A. Statement of Objectives and Redevelopment Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B. Property to be Included in Tax Increment District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 C. Estimated Public Redevelopment Costs, Property to be Acquired Contracts and Development Expected to Occur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . 5 D. Payment of Public Redevelopment Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . 6 E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . . 8 G. Qualifying Local Contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 IV. AMENDMENTS TO PROJECT AND PLANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 EXHIBITS A. List of Parcels in Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-Ramsey County . . . . . . . . A-1 B. Present Estimate of Public Redevelopment Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 C. Report of Tom Goodoien, Consulting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 D. Estimate of Tax Increment to be Received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1 E. Estimate of Impact of District on Other Taxing Jurisdiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1 • 95 I. INTRODUCTION A. Statement of Need and Statutory Authority. On August 25, 1992 the Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony,Minnesota(the "HRA") and the City Council of the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota (the "City"), approved Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3-Ramsey County (the "Original Redevelopment Plan") and Redevelopment Project for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3-Ramsey County(the "Original Redevelopment Project") to be undertaken pursuant thereto, and on March 23, 1993 the Commissioners of the HRA approved certain-amendments to the Original Redevelopment Plan and- Original Redevelopment Project(the Original Redevelopment Plan as so amended is herein called the "Redevelopment Plan" and the Original Redevelopment Project as so amended is herein called the "Redevelopment Project"). It has been proposed that the additional property consisting of the parcel located at 3704 Silver Lake Road on which the Taco Bell restaurant is located (PID#31-30-23-34- 0018) be included in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan (the"Additional Property"). The Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project relate to the redevelopment of Apache Plaza Shopping Center(the "Shopping Center") located at 37`h Avenue North and Silver Lake Road in the City and certain adjacent property. Since the approval of the Original Redevelopment Plan and Original Redevelopment Project by the HRA and the City a portion of the Shopping Center has . been redeveloped by the demolition of certain buildings and the construction of a new grocery store. It has been proposed that the remaining portion of the main center of the Shopping Center and surrounding property be substantially renovated and remodeled and that various public improvements including storm water drainage improvements be undertaken. The property proposed to be so improved is in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project. The proponent of such redevelopment has represented to the City and HRA that such redevelopment will not occur unless financial assistance is provided by the HRA and the City. The HRA has determined that such proposed redevelopment of the Shopping Center is in the best interests of the residents of the City and that the HRA and the City may be able to assist in such redevelopment of the Shopping Center. In order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be paid or incurred by the HRA and the City pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, it is proposed that the HRA adopt a tax increment financing plan (the "Financing Plan"), which provides for the creation.of a Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-Ramsey County (the "District").. This Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project and the Financing Plan is approved by the Commissioners of the HRA and by the City Council of the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and 469.74 to 469.179. B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined in this Section shall for all purposes of the Redevelopment Plan and the Financing Plan, have the meanings given to them in this Section B. • 97 "Bonds" means the tax increment bonds, notes and any other obligations issued by the City, the principal of and interest on which are payable in whole or in part out of the Tax Increment, to finance or provide for the payment or reimbursement of the Public Redevelopment Cost. "Bond Resolution" means any and all resolutions, ordinances, trust indentures and other documents under which any Bonds are sold, issued or secured. "Captured Tax Capacity" means for the District that portion of the Tax Capacity in excess of the Original Tax Capacity as adjusted from time to time, if any. "City" means the City of St. Anthony, Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, Minnesota. "District" means the Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-Ramsey County, established pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing Plan. "Financing Plan" means the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-Ramsey County as approved and as supplemented and amended from time to time by the Board of Commissioners of the HRA. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony, Minnesota. "Original Tax Capacity" means the Tax Capacity of all taxable property.in the Tax Increment District as most recently determined by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota as to the date of certification thereof by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177 and as thereafter adjusted and certified by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177. "Outstanding" when used with respect to the Bonds, means Bonds which have not been paid, redeemed or discharged in accordance with their terms or the terms of the Bond Resolution. "Parcel" means a lot, parcel or tract of plat of land comprising a single unit for purposes of assessment for real estate tax purposes, as of the date of adoption of the Financing Plan. "Public Redevelopment Costs" means the total amount expended and to be expended by the City on Redevelopment Activities as provided in the Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan. "Redevelopment Activities" means all actions taken or to be taken by the City or HRA in establishing, implementing and carrying out the Redevelopment Project. -2- 98 "Redevelopment Plan" means Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 3- Ramsey County, as approved on August 25, 1992 and as amended on March 23, 1993 and as hereby amended, and as further amended from time to time by the HRA pursuant to law. ... "Redevelopment Project" means Redevelopment Project for Redevelopment Project Area. "Redevelopment Project Area" means the Land area or parcels included in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan. "Shopping Center" means the Apache Plaza Shopping Center located within the Redevelopment Project Area. "Tax Capacity" means the net tax capacity of all taxable property in the District as determined from time to time pursuant to state law. "Tax Capacity Rate" means with respect to taxes payable in any year the lesser of(i) the local taxing district tax capacity rates for taxes payable in such year or(ii) the "original tax capacity rate" for the District as defined and calculated in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision la. • "Tax Increment" means that portion of the ad valorem taxes generated by the extension of the Tax Capacity Rate to the Captured Tax Capacity of taxable property in the District. H 2000-1 AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Statement of Need. There is a need for redevelopment of the Shopping Center and surrounding area which will result in the increase of employment opportunities for residents of the City, the increase of the value of property subject to taxation by the City and other local government units, and the increase of general economic activity in the City, all of which will reduce unemployment, improve living conditions, promote desirable redevelopment of land, a portion of which is presently occupied.by buildings which contain defects in structural elements or,a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, including, access to public sewer, light and ventilation and fire protection, layout, which defects or deficiencies are of total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance, and a portion of which is presently occupied by buildings which require substantial renovation or clearance because of conditions such as inadequate street layout, unusual grade conditions, incompatible uses or land use relationships and obsolescence to the extent such buildings are not suitable for improvement or conversion at a cost reasonably related to the public purpose to be served without major residential clearance and with full consideration of the preservation of beneficial aspects of the urban and natural environment, prevent the emergence of blighted property and areas, • -3- 99 and encourage and enhance the general health and welfare of the residents of the City. The actions herein proposed to be taken by the HRA and the City with respect to the Redevelopment Project are necessary to secure the redevelopment of the property included in the Redevelopment Project Area, at this time and in the manner which will meet those needs. B. Statement of Objectives. The objectives sought to be accomplished by the HRA and the City in establishing and carrying out the Redevelopment Project and in financing of the Public Redevelopment Costs thereof, as specified herein, are to meet the needs specified in Paragraph A: a. by promoting and securing the renovation of the property in the Redevelopment Project Area in a manner consistent with applicable governmental comprehensive plans and with a minimal adverse impact on the environment, a portion of which property is not now in productive use; b. by promoting and securing additional employment opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding area, thereby improving living standards and reducing unemployment; c. by correcting storm water run-off problems from the property in the Redevelopment Project Area; and • d. by halting the decline and securing the increase in value of property subject to taxation by the City, Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 282, and other local government taxing jurisdictions, in order to better enable such entities to pay for public improvements and governmental services and programs required to be provided by them. C. Inclusion of Additional Property in Area Subject to Redevelopment Plan; Undertaking of Redevelopment Project. By this Amendment to Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, the Additional Property is included in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan. To meet the objectives set forth in paragraph B, the HRA and the City will undertake the Redevelopment Project. Pursuant to the Redevelopment Project, the HRA will assist with the renovation of the Redevelopment Project Area. Pursuant to the Redevelopment Project, the HRA and the City will either directly or through financial assistance to third parties assist in the land acquisition, renovation or remodeling of an existing building and construction of public improvements which are necessary to meet the needs specified in paragraph A. Such Redevelopment Project is expected to occur over a number of years due to the nature of the property in the Redevelopment Project Area and the continuing evolution and changes which are expected to occur with respect to retail shopping facilities. • -4- 100 III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5-RAMSEY COUNTY A. Statement of Objectives and Redevelopment Project. See paragraphs B and C of the Amendment to Redevelopment Plan. B. Property to be Included in Tax Increment District. The Parcels located in the City of St. Anthony, Ramsey County, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit A shall constitute the Parcels in the District. C. Estimated Public Redevelopment Costs Property to be Acquired Contracts and Development Expected to Occur. 1. Capital Proceeds. The capital proceeds of the project, comprising the proceeds of sale of any land acquired by the HRA or the City to private developers, are expected to be $0.00. 2. Public Redevelopment Costs. The present estimate of Public Redevelopment Costs are expected to be as set forth on Exhibit B,plus interest to be paid on the Tax Increment Bonds during their term (other than interest paid from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds). • 3. Property to be Acquired. If necessary to provide for the redevelopment of the area in the Redevelopment Project Area may acquire all or a portion of the property in the District. Such acquisition may consist of the taking by eminent domain of all or a portion of the property interests of tenants in the District. In addition, it is expected that the HRA will provide financial assistance to the acquisition of land in the District by third parties on which improvements will be constructed. 4. Development Contracts. No contracts have been entered into for future development activities proposed to take place in the Redevelopment Project Area. 5. Development to Occur. The development which the HRA reasonably expects to occur in the Redevelopment Project Area consists of the acquisition and renovation of the main center of the Shopping Center; the building of storm water improvements to accommodate storm water run-off from the Shopping Center and site improvements and other improvements of a public nature related to the renovation of the Shopping Center. Such redevelopment is expected to occur within the next three years. • -5- 101 D. Payment of Public Redevelopment Costs. 1. In General. All Public Redevelopment Costs will be paid from Tax Increment either directly or indirectly by payment of debt service on Tax Increment Bonds issued to finance such costs or reimbursement for items of Public Redevelopment Costs paid directly to the HRA, City or the owner of the property in the Redevelopment Project Area. 2. Issuance of Bonds. It is presently expected that all or a portion of the Public Redevelopment Costs will be financed by the issuance of the Tax Increment Bonds. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued by the HRA or the City under authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and Sections 469.174 to 469.179. The principal amount of the Bonds is estimated to be $6,250,000. The actual principal amount of the Bonds, however, may be less than or exceed this amount, and the right to issue the Bonds in an amount greater than $6,250,000 to finance such Public Redevelopment Costs is reserved. 3. Security For Bonds. The Bonds are expected to be issued as revenue bonds of the HRA or the City payable only from Tax Increment from the District. Such revenue bonds are expected to be issued to the owner of property in the Redevelopment Project Area to reimburse it for Public Redevelopment Costs paid by such owner. 4. Bond Terms. The terms of the Tax Increment Bonds are expected to be as set forth • below; however, the right is reserved to adjust any and all terms of the Tax Increment Bonds to secure the best interest rate obtainable and to insure that the entire principal of and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds will be paid when due from the sources specified in paragraph 3. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued in one or more series, in,the aggregate principal amount of$6,250,000, will mature over a period of approximately eighteen (18) years from the date of receipt by the City of the first Tax Increment from the Tax Increment District, will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, will bear a fixed rate or rates of interest from date of issue to maturity, with interest payable semiannually commencing approximately six months after the issuance thereof, and will be sold at public or private sale. E. Deten-nination and Use of Tax Increment. 1. District Eli ig_bility as a Redevelopment District. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174; subdivision 10 defines a"redevelopment district" as a tax increment financing district consisting of a project or portion of a project in which there is reasonably distributed throughout the district parcels consisting of 70% of the area in the district which are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and more than 50% of the buildings (not including outbuildings) are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. • -6- 102 Based upon a report of Tom Goodoien, Consulting, Bloomington, Minnesota attached hereto as Exhibit C, the HRA believes the District is a "redevelopment district" since the conditions set forth in the preceding paragraph are satisfied with respect to the District. 2. . Orijzinal Tax Capacity. The Tax Capacity of all taxable property in the District as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 2000 with respect to the Tax Capacity of such property as of January 2, 2000, is $150,894. Since the request for certification of the Original Tax Capacity is expected to be filed after June 30, 2000 and prior to June 30, 2001, it is expected that such amount will be the Original Tax Capacity. 3. Current Tax Capacity. The current Tax Capacity of the property in the District is $150,894. 4. Captured Tax Capacity. It is expected that the Captured Tax Capacity of all taxable property in the District, upon completion of the renovation of the property in the District described in the Redevelopment Plan (taxes payable in 2004) in the District, will be $508,468, computed as follows: Estimated Tax Capacity at Completion $659,362 Less Original Tax Capacity at.Completion 150.894 • Estimated Captured Tax Capacity at Completion $508,468 .5. Tax Increment Calculation. Assuming the anticipated renovation of the property in the Redevelopment Project Area occurs as described and provided in the Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan, it is estimated that the Tax Increment to be received each year for the duration of the District will be as set forth in Exhibit D hereto. The estimated amount of Tax Increment set forth in Exhibit D is based upon a Tax Capacity Rate of 140.142%. 6. Duration of the District. It is estimated that the District will remain in existence until 25 years from the date of receipt by the HRA of the first Tax Increment from the District, or until the City's obligation to pay the Tax Increment Bonds and interest has been discharged in accordance with the Bond Resolution. 7. Use of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 2, the City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the Captured Tax Capacity of property located in the District, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived therefrom, for the entire duration of the District. 8. Excess Tax Increment. The Tax Increment received from the District in any year not needed to pay debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds coming due on or before August 1 of the =7- 103 following year, shall be used to prepay or discharge outstanding Tax Increment Bonds or any additional Public Redevelopment Costs. F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions. The local government units other than the City which are authorized by law'to levy ad valorem property taxes and in which the District is located, are Independent School District No. 282, Ramsey County, the HRA, and various metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (the local government units). The taxing jurisdictions encompassing the District will continue to receive taxes as if the Original Tax Capacity of the District were unchanged. This precludes the jurisdictions from benefitting from the portion of the increase in Tax Capacity which results from the improvements to Parcels in the District or other development set forth in Exhibit E is an estimate of the impact of the creation of the District on the taxing jurisdiction of the taxable property within the District. G. Qualifying Local Contribution. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, subdivision 6(d) the District will be exempt from the Local Government Aid/Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid" reduction under • Minnesota Statutes,Section 273.1399 if a "qualifying local contribution" is elected to be made by the. City at the time of approval of the Financing Plan. For the District the local contribution is 5% of the increment. Pursuant hereto and pursuant to the resolution of the City Council approving this Plan the City elects to make a qualifying local contribution with respect to the District. IV. AMENDMENTS TO PROJECT AND PLANS The HRA reserves the right to amend the Redevelopment Project and the Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. The HRA specifically reserves the right to enlarge the geographic area included in the District, to increase the Public Redevelopment Costs and the principal amount of Tax Increment Bonds to be issued to finance such Public Redevelopment Costs,by following the procedures specified in Section 469.175, subdivision 4, if and when it is determined to be necessary for the payment of additional Public Redevelopment Costs. -8- 144 EXHIBIT A PARCELS IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5-RAMSEY COUNTY 31-30-23-33-0002 31-30-23-34-0015 31-30-23-34-0016 31-30-23-34-0018 • A-1 105 EXHIBIT B ESTIMATE OF PUBLIC REDEVELOPMENT COSTS Site Acquisition $3,300,000 Demolition 550,000 Environmental Remediation 1,750,000 Public Utility and Site Improvements 2,970,000 Relocation 145,000 Professional Fees 470,000 Administrative 770,000 Subtotal $ 9,955,000 Interest(including capitalized interest) 8,250,000 TOTAL $18,205,000 • • B-1 1®6 EXHIBIT C REPORT OF TOM GOODOIEN, CONSULTING • C-1 06/15/00 15:48 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. 1®7 ]UNly 2000 APACHE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER, CITY OF ST.ANTHONY, MN. Tom Goodoien,Consulting 9620-137H Ave S. Blootnington,MrL 55425 Ph.888-6450 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL ANALYSIS Scoping-out the existing building condition of the Apache Plaza Department Store located in the Apache Plaza Shopping Center,City of St Anthony,Mn_ in an existing Tax Increment Financing District • FEASIBILITY STUDY Re: Apache Plaza Mall and Shopping Center City of St. Anthony,Mn. Subject:Building Condition Analysis and findings Subject property is essentially a one story retail commercial building constricted in circa 1960's with renovation in subsequent years located near the intersection of Silver Lake Road and County Road D in the Village of St Anthony[the buildings are not easily observed from the nearby arterial roadways].Building components consist of masonry structural components,brick veneer walls,built up root concrete/metal columns,file floors,forced air heating, ventilating and air conditioning system, and grid ceiling with at grade access for both levels of the department stoi-e(there is a lower basement level beneath the mall area). Herberger's Department Store seems self contained with access to the upper floor level in the atrium of the shopping center.The building is not a barrier fi-ee design with many inaccessible areas and the facility lacks an elevator for the physically impaired The building,(including a small hair salon)is totally situatc within the envelop of Apache Plaza Shopping Center Complex • 06/15/00 15:48 FAX 6512233002 _ SPRINGSTED INC. Win" 1®8 • The structural(inverted hyperbolic umbrella design)columns are spaced approximately 60 feet on a square grid system;a combination wet/dry automatic fire sprinkler system protects all areas of the retail space;and the height of the mass of the building is over 14 feet(clear span)above grade at the front foyer.Generally the building assemblies are experiencing a significant lank of normal maintenance and in marginal condition. The building conditions were analyzed to ascertain if certain qualifiers pertinent for a Redevelopment Project are present The load bearing capacity of the structural components were not analyzed to determine their capacity to support the imposed loads.(however the roof system is continually leaking because the super structural components constitute a design defect)The reconnaissance and abbreviated building analysis was conducted in May and June of 2000 and concludes the retail space is obsolete for it's present or continued use,is not designed for an adaptive reuse and is very difficult to find or access by the retail customer.(this building is located the farthest distance from the vehicular access point of entry to the Apache Plaza Shopping Center). According to Laws of Minnesota Section 469.002 subdivision 11 (The Housing and Redevelopment Authorities Act) Blight is defined as "any area with buildings or improvements which by reason of dilapidation, obsolescence,overcrowding,faulty arrangement or design,lack of ventilation • light or salutary facilities,excess land coverage, deleterious land use,or obsolete layout, or any combination of these or other factors,that are detrimental to the safety,health morals, or welfare of the community" Physical and Functional Obsolescence The condition of the Apache Plaza Mall was found to be structurall y substandard in terms of the Statutory Criteria of the Redevelopment Statute Section 469.174 and contains substantial construction defects to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance and is not detemuiied structurally standard There are a number of design defects,out dated mechanical equipment,and lacking certain mechanical equipment for public health and hygiene.The estimated total cost of necessary repairs(Approx.S8,000,000)to comply with the new building code would exceed the required State Statutory threshold of 15%of the buildings replacement value.(see formula below) Of more concern is the obsolete layout and faulty design of this over 325,000 square foot retail facility.The general retail customer is reluctant to walk more than 200 feet to the front entry of a shopping complex from their automobile and certainly not 600 feet from one Major retailer to another with no intervening retailer stores The center also lacks access between the adjacent Cub Food Store and the Apache Plaza Shopping Center. The most in dissolvable problem is the lack of retail exposure to the buying public. This former Department Store building is oriented to the westerly elevation or approximately 2 blocks Westerly of the access point of Silver Lake Road in the City of St. Anthony. • 06/15/00 15:48 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC.. f� 1®9 • Many of the surrounding businesses are also vacant or abandon(obviously sending a message of vacancy to the potenti al retail customer]. And finally,most glitzy up scale shopping centers have double loaded corridors assembled around open atriums offering the retail customer a wide variety of shopping opportunities.The Apache Plaza Shopping Center has only single loaded corridors with long distances between retail stores and various°vacancy's" and vacant space discourages shoppers.(the atrium is very wide and spacious but the long distances between shops and major retailers is an inconvenience to customers). The above obsolete features of the building are unavoidable due to its character and cannot be concealed or retro5t}ed to a alternative or adaptive retail reuse(e.g. suggest office or light mamufacWrring).The interior spatial arrangement of the partitions, arrangements, structural elements,utilities,means of servicing,means of exiting, are obsolete to provide ease of access to all spaces of this retail facility, when this complex is compared to similar occupancy classifications. The City of St Anthony is proposing to decertify the existing Tax Increment Financing District and re certify the area as a new Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District. Existing Conditions This report is preliminary and does not address environmental issues such as • pollution,contamination,fugitive spills,asbestos containing materials,PCB. containing transformers(that do exist in the Apache Plaza Shopping Center),or other unknown physical or geo-technical problems. A more thorough examination of the building with the owners permission pursuant to the Statutory requirement of making such effort to conduct ax)interior inspection of the property to support a reasonable conclusion as to structurally substandard, would not reveal a different conclusion because I basically viewed 80%of the structural elements(I did not examine the inaccessible mechanical or electrical systems)and it is with reasonable certainty further examination would not cluge the conclusion.However,based on my preliminary review of the accessible spaces of the.Apache Plaza Shopping Center it is with reasonable certainty the building is structurally substandard under the State Statutory criteria,and further that there exist many observable substantial combination of defects that are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance and this building does qualify as eligible under the statutory fortnulas.(e.g.The cost of retail replacement is estimated at S45 dollars per square foot(not including land.value)times 325,600 sq. feet equals approx.$14,625,000 replacement cost with the estimated cost of repairs and renovation exceeding$8,000,000 therefore exceeding the threshold complying with the statutory formula of cost of renovation or repairs over 15%of replacement cost). 06/15/00 15:48 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. zoos 110 conclusion The fundamental design defects of the subject property generates instability for retail/commercial operations,hinders viability of adjacent retail shops, and results in uneconomic return for the owners investment The site plan is an ill conceived convoluted scheme,difficult to access,and involves long distances that constitute an obstacle that adversely impacts feasible retail development and convenience shopping expected by the retail customer. cc: Springsted Development Corp. C/O Paul Steinman Nick Scaricb • • 06/15/00 15:48 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. MEMORANDUM i To:Paul Steinman,Planning and Community Development, Springsted Corp., From Tom Goodoier),Consulting Subject:Feasibility of Creating a Redevelopment District in the Area of the Westerly frontage of the intersection of County Road D and Silver Lake Road Located in the Municipal boundary lines of the City of St. Anthony,W. Proposed creation of a new Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing District( Tom. ]Eligibility Analysis For Apache Plaza Shopping Center Development Project Pursuant to my reconnaissance of the Proposed decertified/re certified Redevelopment Project Area of the City of St. Anthony,Mn,generally described as follows: geographically along the westerly frontage of Silver lake Road and County Road D including the Apache.Plaza Shopping Center and the Taco Bell Fast food Store. The proposed project boundary could be classified as a blighted area in accordance with the statutory criteria for finding a Redevelopment Project area described as follows: • Essentially the subject property appears to conform with the statutory criteria for a Redevelopment Project in accordance with the Laws of Minnesota Section 469.002. Subdivision 11(The Housing Redevelopment Authorities Act)wherein blight is defined as"any area with buildings or improvements, which by reason of dilapidation,obsolescence,lack of sanitary 'facilities ,excess land coverage or vacant land,deleterious land use,or obsolete layout,or any combination of these or other factors,that are detrimental to the safety,health morals or welfare of the community". The property that may be treated,includes the above parameter of property described with reasonable specificity,and exhibits the deficiencies that warrant substantial renovation or clearance that were found and that could qualify the area for the proposed redevelopment activity in the Plan. The proposed project meets the area wide specific test in as much as the deficiencies found are reasonably distributed throughout the entire project area and after deliberate in depth analysis the Municipality could adopt a Redevelopment District after establishing a finding of structurally substandard for Redevelopment-Tax Increment Financing District(T1F) The additional documentation has been prepared in accordance with eligibility contained in the Redevelopment Act.(see below*) The conclusion reached is the approximately 1,500,000 square feet(35.5 acre) property site is structurally and environmentally blighted,effected by a major trafficked County Hwy.and the design defects inherent in distressed buildings(cantilevered hyperbolic inverted umbrella type supporting columns)and that these vacant uses are incompatible with fundamental land use patterns. (general commercial uses is the predominant land use identified on the City's Comprehensive Plan). • IAnnmp-Wa Canmunity OwdloP-ont Agency 06/15/00 15:48 FA% 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. lei 112 Subject buildings are generally one to one and one half story masonry/metal frame assemblies built in the 1960-80 era and currently partially occupied The remaining parcels are commercial or vacant but improved land with City streets,utilities,and other improvements (infrastructure)but as vacant,is under utilized or inappropriately used land which constitutes an uneconomic use of inner city real estate. The scope and purpose of this report is to document the condition of this area of City of St.Anthony, Mn. in which the buildings were constructed in the late 60's to 80's and are adequate for today's occupancy loads but obsolete, lacking proper foundations,upgrading to modern standards for commercial space,including improving the mechanical, electrical , structural,life safety constituents, American's with Disabilities Act and state energy conservation standards consistent with modern commercial occupancies. DISCUSSION All property(regardless of the metbod of sale,eminent domain or source of funds used)must be located within a project boundary as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.002 or treated under the"Spot Renewal"provision of the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Authorities Act (the old Section 462 of Minnesota Statutes)The purpose of the above statutes is to eliminate blighting influences by acquiring and clearing or rehabilitating properties that the city finds have caused or will cause the value of properties in the area to decrease or that will increase the probability that properties in the area will be allowed to physically deteriorate,etc. • This area of City of St. Anthony,Mn. does.not promote a diversity of business and shopper interest,ensure a pedestrian-friendly commercial development,insure adequate park-in g,and include architectural materials and techniques demonstrating compatibility with neighborhood buildings.(for example buildings should be oriented so the principal entrance to the structure faces a public street or sidewalk and multiple entrances should be encouraged). Note: the blighting influences of this area are characterized by the following defects; Physical and Functional Obsolescence In terms of the Apache Plaza.Shopping Center,the interior arrangement of rooms ,partitions,and structural elements and/or the utilities,stairs,means of egress and means of servicing,or emergency exits are not lawful,obsolete, and inadequate.The lack of necessary features (elevators to serve all levels and handicapped accessibility for the physically impaired)and inadequacies of the plan or layout impose a hindrance to the efficient use of the building and property, limit the use of the property or require abandoning part of the property to achieve safety.Many areas of the Apache Plaza Center are locked off for purposes of security and lack legal egress and side door clearance. The restructured roof system is differentially torguing and placing tension action on the structure that has resulted in roof leakage that happens with discouraging regularity. • 06/15/00 15:49 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. fj 113 Incompatible use or Land Use Relationships The use of the property and the structures adversely affects the predominant commercial use and character of the area primarily due to deterioration and vacant buildings, street hazards or inaccessible properties,congestion of streets due to inadequate space for the use,its parking and servicing needs:traffic,service trucks,parked cars,or type of activity generated or attracted by this commercial use in appropriated sited in this location. These features of the use are unavoidable due to its commercial character. The existing property cannot be converted to a use compatible with the commercial surroundings because of the site, or building design or because of economic or building code restrictions. (eg. Too much of the former shopping center,namely Penny's Department Store,was demolished to make space for the Garb Food Store but resulted in excessively vacant land). Hazard to Health or Safety The structure and property without benefit of a full retail intensity are necessarily obsolete for the present,permitted or future use and are marginal in terms of current code and energy conservation requirements . Vacant buildings or those buildings indicating a lack of normal maintenance have a proclivity for causing declining values of adjacent properties. (some buildings appear open to the elements and others indicate hazardous occupancy). Major renovation or reconstruction of the structures or portions thereof would be required to t eliminate building code problems,however,removal of a portion of the building(already performed without benefit to the shopping center)would remove essential space or facilities needed for continued operation or use of the property,while the cost and nature of the reconstruction or repairs would be prohibitive or could not be accomplished within the restriction of local codes or ordinances.Deterioration of the roof systems and wasted energy will continue and result in,ultimately,the relocation of the occupant in order to construct the proper roof assembly or insulate the building to thermal standards. Generally speaking,the area proposed for redevelopment could qualify as a Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District because the building conditions are marginal ,in most cases substandard, and after further detailed analysis it is with reasonable certainty the above described deficiencies could result in a finding of Structurally Substandard for over 50%of the buildings (not including out buildings). Also under the 70%Occupancy Test For TIF District; in order to meet the eligibility criteria established in the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act for redevelopment tax increment financing districts"parcels consisting of 70%of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets utilities or other improvements,(Section 469.174, Subd 10(a)(1). Individual parcels are considered"occupied by buildings,streets, utilities or other improvements" if "15 %of the area of the parcels contain improvements". (section 469.174, subd.10 (c) In the case of a parcel on which the building has been demolished,remaining utilities or other improvements would still permit the parcel to be considered occupied as long as the utilities or • UU/.15/00 15:49 FAX 6512259002 SPRINGSTED INC. 114 • other improvements(eg sidewalks,parking space, former building footings etc) remain on the or near the parcel. *Finally,the condition of the subject property was analyzed to determine if there was sufficient MiLf to meet the test of the State Statute,Laws of Minnesota Chapter or section 469.174 Subd 10. (a)clause 2 that states that"more than 50%of the buildings(not including out buildings)must be Mound to be structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance"The proposed area includes the above described property which exhibits over 50% of the buildings(2 out of 2 buildings) with deficiencies warranting substantial renovation or clearance and appears to qualify the proposed area eligible for TIF district interpretation under the Redevelopment Statute. Also the statute stipulates a building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15% of the replacement cost of constructing a new structure of similar square footage and type of building on the same site. The city may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, sucb as size ,type, and age of the building,the average cost of plumbing and electrical,or structural repairs or other similar reliable evidence(public construction permit activity). If the evidence supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is not disqualified as structurally substandard,the city may NOT make such determination without an interior inspection of the property. If denied entry after the municipality has used it's"best efforts"to • gain entry for an interior evaluation a reasonable conclusion as to structurally substandard may be-supported by other available evidence(record of permits,public records of police and fire departments,etc) The Proposed creation of a T1F District includes 5 parcels of land with 2 buildings and approx. 34.5 acres of land, described as follows(aka_ Apache Plaza Development) Area Tabulation. Property.Id# LAND (sq Building Improved Structurally ]Footage) (yes/no) (1.5%) Substandard A4 1500000 yes yes yes Apache Plaza A-2 20980 yes yes yes Taco Bell • 06/15/00 15:49 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. Q(, 115 Conclusion As an outside consultant I have analyzed the condition of the subject buildings and the evidence . is reasonable and the evaluations are based on the estimated cost of code(building)compliance for the structural,mechanical, electrical,heating HVAC,life safety,egress,occupancy loads, Americans with Disabilities Act,and energy conservation requirements needed for compliance. The subject property located in the City of St.Anthony,Mm is an area of troubled buildings requiring substantial renovation or clearance and may exhibit deficiencies in other categories such as utilities,facilities, light,ventiWion,fire protection,(or lack thereof)egress, interior partitions and unknown factors(there exists PCB containing transformers in this building)such as asbestos abatement,pollution,lead based paints and the need for thermal energy conservation to comply with the building code. Findings Therefore the cost to modify the existing buildings, determined by the aforementioned statutory formula,exceeds the 15%cost of constructing a new building on the some site and with reasonable certainty qualifies the subject properties according to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174 Subd 10.(a)as described above and concludes the finding that more than 50% (2 out of 2 buildings or 100%) of the parcels with buildings are structurally substandard . Reconnaissance was conducted in May and June of 2000 and did include an informal interior view of those buildings open to the public. The City of St Anthony sent letters to all owners requesting an interior evaluation of their ownership. As you are aware the City of St Anthony must create a District pursuant to a determination on the"But for"question and"Public Purpose"requirements inherent in all Redevelopment Districts. There are two different approaches to utilize TIF funds to finance future public redevelopment costs that impact this site. The statutory constraints and short term of the existing district may undermine project feasibility and inhibit redevelopment. The alternative method is to decertify the parcels from the existing district and establish a new TIF district to finance new project costs and that is the perspective in which I have analyzed this project assignment Since the shopping center has been predominantly vacant for many years it is reasonable to assume that the consent for TIF approval could be obtained from the City of St. Anthony. Calculations A typical (example)calculation of a commercial building would contain 1000 square feet times S45 dollars per square foot for replacement cost(Marshall Swift Replacement Cost not including land value)equals S 45,000 times 15%equals approximately$6750 and the cost of necessary renovation was estimated at$15,000 to 20,000 thousand dollars,thereby exceeding the threshold ($6750)of the statutory formula and qualifying the subject properties structurally substandard in accordance with Laws of Minnesota 469.174 Subdivision 10 Clause 2 a. (an example of a commercial/retail type building calculation) This concludes my analysis-Call me if I can be of further assistance to your redevelopment needs at(612)724-4843 or 888-6450 cc Nick Scarich, Springsted Corp. 06/.15/00 15:49 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. 116 i MEMORANDUM to the File June 2000 Subject: Redevelopment District-Tax Increment Financing District Apache Plaza property -Tinto SELL Re: Building Condition Analysis, Blight Test Findings For Proposed Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District Apache Plaza Shopping Center area Documentation and condition Analysis of Taco Bell Subject Property consists of essentially one story commercial type building constructed circa 1983. Building components consist of masonry walls, built up roof of pitch and gravel, concrete floors and at grade access. Most of the original building components have not been renovated in the past 6 years. The building conditions were analyzed to ascertain qualifiers pertinent to Minnesota Statutes*(see below) The commercial spaces are not necessarily obsolete for their • present or continued use but are functionally obsolete for retail spaces serving the public patron and lack certain life safety factors , elements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and obsolete mechanical systems essential for public health and hygiene. According to Laws of Minnesota Section 469.002 Subdivision 11,(The Housing And Redevelopment Authorities Act) blight is defined as"any area with buildings or improvements which, by reason of dilapidation , obsolescence , overcrowding, faulty arrangement or design, lack of ventilation, light and sanitary facilities, excess land coverage, deleterious land use, or obsolete layout, or any combination of these or other factors, that are detrimental to the safety, health, morals, or welfare of the community". Discussion All property (regardless of sale , eminent domain, or source of funding) must be located within a project boundary as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.002 or treated under the Spot Renewal" provision of the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Authorities Act(the Old Section 462 of.Minnesota Statutes) The Activities planned for the proposed project area consist of new office and or mixed light manufacturing uses and includes approximately 34 acres of land. The deterioration of the vacant commercial uses undermines the value of the adjacent property. The use constitutes a repository for debris, and a fire hazard. 06/15/00 15:49 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. 117 • The condition of the property was analyzed to determine If there is sufficient evidence to meet the test of State Statute ,-Laws Of Minnesota Chapter 469.174, Subdivision 10.Clause (a) definition:" 70% of the area of the parcels in the district must be occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other.improvements, and more than 50% of the buildings, not Including out buildings are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. The proposed area includes the above described property which exhibits 100% of the buildings( two out of two) with deficiencies warranting substantial renovation or clearance, and qualifies the TIF District (approximately 34 acres) as eligible , under the Redevelopment District Statute. Note: All the parcels in the proposed.District exceed the required 15% improvement clause which stipulates the area must be occupied by buildings, streets , utilities, covering over 15% or more of the site , Area contains 5 Property Identification Numbers Also the Statute stipulates a building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15% of the cost of constructing a new structure of similar square footage and type of building on the same site. The City may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as size, type and age of building, • the average cost of plumbing, and electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar reliable evidence. If the evidence supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is not disqualified as structurally substandard, the City may NOT make such detennination without an interior inspection of the property- If denied entry after the municipality has :used its' " best efforts", a reasonable conclusion as to structurally substandard may be supported by other available evidence(eg. County Data Sheets, public records, permits etc.) The City's evidence is reasonable and the evaluations of structurally substandard are based on the estimated cost of code compliance for the structural , mechanical, electrical, heating/HVAC systems, American's with Disabilities Act, life safety issues, egress, occupancy loads, energy conservation and public health code requirements. Next the estimates were compared to the cost data referenced in Marshall/Swift Valuation Service Guide. NOTE: The Marshall/Swift Valuation Service Guide is the foremost authoritative publication used to establish the cost approach to value and has been used in the appraisal profession for over 50 years_ The valuation service contains modifiers for location and time. Only parcels containing improvements (buildings) totaling 15% or more were quantified. Using the Marshall/Swift Valuation Service Guide ,all the above described building components for the subject properties were valued in terms of constructing the same building new on the site. Land values were not included in the summation, nor was economic obsolescence , which was evident in the evaluation of the subject buildings. • 06415/00 15:50 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. 013 118 • There were many significant dysfunctional elements in the subject building that need attention: some of the buildings lack fire suppression systems or need updating of the mechanical systems for food service facilities. The food preparation process for poultry, beef, and vegetables must be separated between tables used for the different foods. Also food preparation personnel must have separate hand lavatory equipment dedicated to each of the different types of foods served to insure proper hygiene. Lastly , the water dispenser equipment must have special wastes that are separate from the usual waste plumbing system. This applies to both drinking water dispenser and coffee making equipment. Also this fast food outlet must comply with the American's with Disability's Act (for commercial facilities serving the general public.) (Also there is no second means of egress directly to the exterior to a street or alley that is separate or remote) Estimated cost to cure the above deficiencies would exceed $45000 and would require the business to close for the renovation. The interior spatial arrangement or the partitions, and structural elements, utilities, means of egress and means of servicing or exits, are obsolete to provide lawful access to all spaces of this commercial/retail facility, that are commonly found in similar occupancy classifications. The above combination of deficiencies qualifies the buildings located in the proposed Redevelopment District in accordance with the statutory criteria described above because the conditions are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic proposed project area of the re certified Redevelopment District. • The City's evidence is reasonable and the evaluation of structurally substandard is based on the estimated cost of new code compliance for the structural, mechanical electrical, heating/ventilating/HVAC, American's with Disability Act, life safety , .egress, and energy conservation components or lack thereof at subject properties. *Therefore, the cost to modify the existing buildings determined structurally substandard or not in compliance with the new building code exceeds 15 % of the cost of constructing a new building on the same site (using replacement value) and qualifies the subject property under Laws Of Minnesota Section 469.174 subdivision 10 clause (a). (The housing and Redevelopment Authorities Act) to meet the test of Therefore the unsafe ,obsolete , faulty design, or any combination of these or other factors of the buildings, that are determined to be detrimental to the safety, health, morals, or welfare of the community ,essentially conclude the subject properties are blighted and structurally substandard. Existing Conditions This report does not address environmental issues (eg. pollution, contamination fugitive spills, asbestos, PCB containing transformers, or other unknown physical problems). CONCLUSION: The fundamental design defects of the subject property generates instability for commercial operations, hinders viability of adjacent property and results • in uneconomic return for the owners investment and adverse effect on the adjacent 06/15/00 15:50 FAX 6512233002 SPRINGSTED INC. 0 - 119 The Findings More than 50% of the buildings are found structurally substandard due to a combination of defects that are of sufficient total significance,to justify.substantial renovation or clearance and qualifies the buildings'as eligible under the statutory criteria and formula for Tax Increment Financing District Funding. Example of a Typical Calculation would estimate$75 dollars per square foot for commercial/retail food service use replacement cost times 15 % equaled the formula threshold and when the cost of necessary renovation exceeded the amount of the 15% cost of replacement the calculation concluded thereby qualified the building as structurally substandard in accordance with Laws of Minnesota. Cc Springsted Corp. • • 12® EXHIBIT D ESTIMATE OF TAX INCREMENT TO BE RECEIVED Assumptions Repo City of St.Anthony,Minn"ota Tax Increment Financing Dlsrrlct No.if ApachelHillcrest Protect Scenario H Type of Tax Increment Financing District Redevelopment Maximum Duration of TIF District(1) 25 years from 1st increment Certification Request Date a6/0710o Decertllleation Date 12101127 (26 Years of Increment) 1999/2000 Base Estimated Market Value 55,029,800 Times_First 5150,000 3.00% 4,500 Excess 3.00°1. 1,16.$G4 Original Net Tax Capacity $150.894 Assessmeni/Collection Year 2000/2001 2001/2002 2002/2003 20031004 Base Estimated Market Value(5MV) $5,029,600 $5,029,800 $5.029.800 55.029,600 Decrease in EMV $O s0 so $o • Increase In EMV 0 0 0. O Increase In EMV(Future Development) Phase 1 ($7,000,000-pay 2002) 0 7,000,000 7,140,000 7,282,800 Phase It ($7,000,000-pay 2003) 0 0 7,000,000 7,140,000 Phase 111 ($7,000,000•pay 2004) 0 0 0 7,000,000 Phase IV 0 0 0 0 Phase V 0 0 0 O Phase 1 ($=,Sol Land-pay 2002) O 534,335 545.022 555,922 Adjustment O (5,029,800) (5,029,800) (5,029,800) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Estimated Market Value $5,029,800 57,534,335 $14,685,022 $21,978,722 'rimes:First 5150,000 3.00°1. 4,500 4,500 4,500 d.500 Excess 3,001,6 146,394 221,530 436,051 654.862 Total Net Tax Capacity $150,894 5226,030 $440,551 $659,362 Base Inflation Factor NA Loral Tait Capacity Rate 140.142%1999/t10 Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District 0.00000/0 1996/99 - Administrative Retalnage Percent(maximum=1096) 5.00% Pooling Percent 0.00% City Tax Rate(Only if Loral-Effort TIF) NA Inflation Rate 102.0% %of TIF applied to Developer Note 100.0% %of TIF applied to debt service on bonds 0.0% Bonds Nole(PaV•As Yau-Gol Bonds Dated 08/01/00 Note Dated 06/01/00 First Interest Date 02/01/01 Note Rate 9,50°/ Underwriters Discount 1.5096 • I.GA/HACA Loss: Will Annual Local Goninbution Be Made(Yes or No)? yes I.S.D 4191 Equalized Tax Capacity Rate 43.11% 1998199 I.S.D 0191 Sales Ratio 92.70% 1998199 City Sales Ratio&Taxable Net Tax Capacity NA NA Present Value Date&Rate 06MI/oo 9.50%, Assumes new assessed value of$70 per square foot (Inflation factor of 2% • • Projected Annual Tax Increment City of St.Anthony,Minnesota Tax Increment Financing District No,x Apache/Hillcreal Project - Scenario H Less: Less: Retained Times: Less: Less: Plus: Cummulailve Annual Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual Slate Aud. Admin. Annual Local Annual Period Net Tax Net Tax Disp. i9 Net Tex Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Relelnage Nei Tax Conlribullon Net Ending Capacity Capacity 010000% Capacity Rate Increment 025% 5.00% Increment 5.00% Revenue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 12/31100 150,894 150,894 0 0 140.142% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 12/31/01 150,694 150,894 0 0 140.142% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12/31/02 226,030 150,894 0 75,136 140.142% 105,297 263 5,252 99,782 5,252 99,782 99,782. 12/31/03 440,551 150,694 0 289,657 140.142% 405,931 1,015 20,246 384,670 20,246 384,670 464,452 12/31104 659,362 150,894 0 508,468 140.142% 712,577 1,781 35,540 675,256 35.540 675,256 1,159,708 12131/05 672,549 150,894 0 521,655 140.142% 731,056 1,828 36,462 892,768 36,462 692,768 1,852,476 12/31/06 686.000 150,894 0 535,106 140.142% 749,906 1,675 37,402 710,631 37,402 710,631 2,563,107 12/31/07 699,720 150,894 0 548,826 140.14210 769,136 1,923 38,361 728,852 38,361 728,652 3,291,959 12/31/08 713,714 150,094 0 562,620 140.142% 788,747 1,972 39,339 747,438 39,339 747,436 4,039,395 12/31/09 727,989 . 150,894 0 577,095 140.142% BOB,752 2,022 40,337 766,393 40,337 766,393 4,805,788 12/31/10 742,548 150,894 0 591,654 140.142% 829,156 2,073 41,354 785,729 41,354 785,729 5,591,517 12/31/11 757,399 150,894 0 606,505 140.142% 849,968 2,125 42,392 805,451 42,392 805,451 6,396,968 12/31/12 772,547 150,894 0 62103 140.142% 671,197 2,178 43,451 825,568 43,451 825,566 7,222,536 12/31/13 787,998 150,894 0 637,104 140.142% 892,850 2,232 44,531 646,087 44,531 846,087 8,068,623 12131114 600,758 150,894 0 652,864 140.142% 914,937 2,287 45,633 867,017 45,633 867,017 8,935,640 12/31115 019,833 150,894 0 668,939 140.142% 937,464 2,344 46,756 888,364 46,756 688,364 9,824,004 12/31/16 836,230 150,894 0 6B5,336 140.142% 960,444 2,401 47,902 910,141 47,902 910,141 10,734,143 12/31/17 852,955 150,894 0 702,061 140.142% 983,882 2,460 49,071 932,351 49,071 932.351 11,686,496 12/31/18 870,014 150,894 0 719,120 140.142% 1,007,789 2,519 50,264 955,006 50,264 955,006 12,621,502 12/31/19 887,414 150,894 0 736,520 140.142% 1,032,174 2,580 •51,480 978,114 51,460 978,114 0 12/31/20 905,162 150,894 0 754,268 140.142% 1,057,046 2,643 52,720 1,001,683 52,720 1,001,683 0 12/31/21 923,286 150,894 0 772,372 140.142% 1,082,418 2,706 53,986 1,025,726 53,986 1,025,726 0 12/31/22 941,731 150,894 0 790,837 140.142% 1,108,295 2,771 55,276 1,050,248 55,276 1,050,248 0 12/31/23 960,565 150,894 0 809,671 140.142% 1,134,689 2,837 56,593 1,075,259 56,593 1,075,259 0 12131124 979.777 150,894 0 828,683 140.142% 1,161,613 2,904 57,935 1,100,774 57,935 1,100,774 0 12131/25 999,372 150,894 0 848,478 140.1429'0 1,169,074 2,973 59,305 1,126,796 .59,305 1,126,796 0 12131/26 1,019,360 150,894 0 968,466 140.142% 1,217,086 3,043 60,702 1,153,341 60,702 1,153,341 0 ' 12P31/27 1,039,747 150,894 0 888,653 140.142% 1.245,656 3,114 62,127; 1,180,415 62,127 1,180,415 0 12/31/28 0 0 0 0 140.142%1 01 0 0 0 01 01 0 $23547144 S58,869 $1,174,417 $22,313,858 $1,174,417 22313858 $0 (12) Does not Include the local oonlrlbulion. N Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurlsdictlons Report City of St.Anthony,Minnesota Tax Increment Financing District No,x > Apache/Hlticrest Project M Scenario H 0 Without Project or TIF District With Project and TIF District > Hypothetical H Projected YPbl � 1999100 1999/00 Retained New Hypothetical Hypothetical Tax Generated Q Taxable 1999/00 Taxable Captured Taxable Adjusted Decrease In by Retained Z Taxing Net Tax Local Net Tex Net Tax Nei Tax Local Local Captured C7 Jurisdiction Capacity(1) Tax Rate Capacity(1) + Capacity(3) _-Capacity Tax Rate(') Tax Rate(') N.T.C.(') l'n City of St.Anthony 5,141,361 30.359% 5,141,361 3688,853 6,030,214 25.884% 4.475% 230,071 Ramsey County 299,096,490 44.865% 299,096,490 888,853 299,985,343 44.752% 0.133% 397,780 Z O 171 IS M2,St.Anthony 6,194,793 57.624% 6,184,793 888,853 7,083,646 60,393% 7.231% 447,823 Other(2) _-- 7.274% — 888,853 -- 7.274% -- — Totals 140.142% 126.303°0 11.839% 0 • Statement 1: If the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to each of the taxing jurisdictions above,the result would be a lower local tax rate(see Hypothetical Adjusted Tax Rate above) which would produce the same amount of taxes for each taxing jurisdiction. In such a case,the total local tax rata would decrease by 11.839%(see Hypothetical Decrease in local Tax Rate above). The hypothetical tax that the C7 Retained Captured Net Tex Capacity of the TIF District would generate Is also shown above. Slatemenl 2; Since the projected.Retalned Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District is not available to the taxing jurisdictlons, Z then there Is no Impact on taxes levled or local tax rates, (1) Taxable net lax capacity=total net tax capacity-captured TIF-fiscal disparity contribution. (2) The Impact on these taring jurisdictions Is negligible since they represent only 5.19%of the total lax rate. (3) Projected retained captured net tax capacity=total projected net tax capacity-original not tax capacity(based on pay 2000 values)-fiscal disparities, N 123 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 00-0 6 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING 2000-1 AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 3-RAMSEY COUNTY AND THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5- RAMSEY COUNTY, AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of St. Anthony (the"HRA") and this Council by resolutions adopted August 25, 1992 approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, • designated as Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3-Ramsey County(the "Original Redevelopment Plan"), and a redevelopment project as defined in Minnesota Statutes, .Section 469.002, subdivision 14, to be undertaken pursuant thereto, designated as Redevelopment Project No. 3-Ramsey County (the "Original Redevelopment Project"), and on March 23, 1993, the HRA and the City Council approved amendments to the Original Redevelopment Plan and Original Redevelopment Project (the Original Redevelopment Plan as so amended is herein called the "Amended Redevelopment Plan" and the Original Redevelopment Project as so amended is herein called the "Amended Redevelopment Project"). The HRA has approved an amendment to the Amended Redevelopment Plan and Amended Redevelopment Project designated as 2000-1 Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3-Ramsey County (the "2000-1 Amendment," and the Amended Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 2000-1 Amendment is hereinafter referred to as the"Redevelopment Plan," and the Amended Redevelopment Project as amended by the 2000-1 Amendment is hereinafter referred to as the "Redevelopment Project"). ,The 2000-1 Amendment includes additional property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan and provides for additional redevelopment activities to be undertaken by the City and HRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Project. In order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, the HRA has approved a tax increment financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, designated as Tax Increment Plan for Financing District No. 5-Ramsey County(the"Financing Plan"), which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, • subdivision 9, designated as Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-Ramsey County(the "District"). The HRA has requested that this Council approve the 2000-1 Amendment and Financing Plan 124 following a public hearing thereon. The HRA has furnished to this Council a copy of the 2000-1 Amendment and of the Financing Plan and the written opinion of the City Planning Commission as to the 2000-1 Amendment and Financing Plan, and this Council on July 25,2000, held a public hearing on the same after notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City, not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing., All.persons desiring to be.heard.were heard. 2. The 2000-1 Amendment, Financing Plan and establishment of the District are hereby approved. 3. This Council finds that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, on the basis that there is reasonably distributed throughout the District the following conditions: (i) parcels consisting of 70% of the area in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and (ii) more than 50% of the buildings (not including outbuildings) are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. In making this determination the City Council has reviewed and is relying on the report of Tom Goodoien, Consulting, included in the 2000-1 Amendment and Financing Plan, and information otherwise available to the City. 4. Based upon the reasons and supporting facts set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.028, it is hereby found that: • (A)The land located within the project area subject to the Redevelopment Plan would not be made available for redevelopment without financial aid sought; (B)The Redevelopment Plan for the area within the City included therein will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of such areas by private enterprise; and (C)The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. 5. Based upon the reasons and supporting facts set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, it is hereby found that: (A) For reasons stated in Section 3 of this Resolution, the District is a Redevelopment District as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10. (B)The proposed redevelopment to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through is -2- 125 • private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the property included in the District that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result form the proposed redevelopment after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the Financing Plan. (C)The Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. (D)The Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the District by private enterprise. (E)The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 3,clause (a). Passed by the Council this 25°i day of July, 2000. Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Manager The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the City Clerk. • -3- X. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS. 126 • ain �le hen illa Administrative Offices 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-169'9 , (612).789-8881 FAX (612) 781-9323 July 20, 2000 \ T O f� S�e Ms. Kathy Knapp, Community Services D' 3301 Silver Director N n d Q� � o er Lake Road St. Anthony,MN 55418 Dear Ms. Knapp: This letter is to inform you that the City of St. Anthony will be applying for a major ($:100,000) from the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission grant Central Park Redevelopment project. We_need our help! We received thewranthe notification, and the City will need to pull together a great deal of information on the Programs, budgets and capabilities of its partners: Community Services, the school district, and Sports Boosters, before the application deadline of August 15" • The following outline describes the contents and organization of the grant application. You are invited to a meeting, on Wednesday, July 26,at 2:00 p.m., at the City offices, to begin assembling this material. Please notify Bob Kost at 373-6421 as to whether you will be able to attend. y As the City's parks consultants, we are assisting in preparation of the rant What we need from you is the following: g application. • A list of the activities and services that your organization provides • Additional activities and services you'll provide at this facility • Documentation of the number of participants, especially children in grades 4 through 8 Any evidence of need or demand for facilities (i.e. fields)and the City's inability to meet them without thisprolect. Your annual budget, if available. We recognize that volunteer groups such as Sports Boosters will have less financial budget information—we'just need the basics. . and Also from Community Services or other school district source, we need information on children within the district receiving freelreduced price lunch,if available. We also need a description of the collaborative efforts between City, school distiict, and other entities • or agencies. i 127 Page 2 _ ® July 20,2000 We recognize that this seems like a lot of information! In many will be sufficient. If you have questions,please contact Bob Kostases, a brief description Thanlcs.for your help and for your ongoing support of this project.meeting with you next Wednesday. p We look forward to Bob Kost Parks Planner Suzanne Rhees Community Planner P.S. Please excuse the lack of signatures; we are sending this by e-mail through the City. cc: Mike Momson, City Manager • MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS • MEMORANDUM DATE: 7/11/00 TO: City Manager Mornson FROM: Assistant City Manager RE: UPDATE OF THE CRITICAL PATH FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ORDINANCE/PROCESS AND HILLCREST DEVELOPMENT'S REDEVELOPMENT OF APACHE PLAZA PROPERTY To date the"Critical Path"is amended as follows: Critical Path/Important Dates Tar et Complete Task 4/18/00 .4/18/00 Planning Commission meeting. Commission approved an amendment to.the Comprehensive Plan. Commission to ask Hillcrest to withdraw their request for zoning map change and zoning code amendment 4/25/00 4/25/00 City Council meeting. Council to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. 4/27/00 4/26/00 Planning Consultant Consultant to submit"Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment"to Metropolitan Council. Planning Consultant to facilitate the approval . • of said amendment. 5/2/00 5/2/00 Planning Commission work session. Commission to hold work session with Planning Consultant,stn.$and Hillcrest to discuss the draft PUD ordinance and process. 519/00 5110/00 Planning Consultant Consultant to submit final PUD ordinance and related forms applications,etc.to staff Said ordinance and related documents shall be"approved as to form"by City Attorney Soth. Additionally,Consultant to work with Hillcrest to prepare them for the PUD process. 5/15/00 5/15/00 City Council work session. Council to hold work session with Planning Commission Representative,Planning Consultant,star and Hillcrest to discuss PUD ordinance and process. 5116100 5/16/00 Planning Commission meeting. Commission to hear.PUD ordinance. Commission, Consultant,and staff to hold/hear Hillcrest Development's"Application Conference' and"Sketch Plan." 5123/00 5/23/00 City Council meeting. City Council to hear the PUD ordinance(one reading). 616100 6/6/00 Planning Commission work session. Commission to hold work session with Planning Consultant,star and HilIcrest. • 2 6!20100 620100 Planning Commission meeting. Commission to hear(Public Hearing)"Preliminary Development Plan"(PUD/site spec)and make recommendations for approval or denial of said plan Commission also to hear(Public Hearing)plan for Tax Increment Financing(TIF). 627100 6/27/00. City Council meeting. Council to hear Preliminary Development Plan (PUD/site specific). NOTE: Council referred Preliminary Plan back to the Planning Commission. 7/18/00 --- Planning Commission meeting. Applicant will request that the Commission hold a special meeting August 1, 2000 to re visit, via public, hearing, the Preliminary Development Plan(PUD/site specific)to include rezoning of the Apache Plaza from "C'district to PUD designation. The applicant also requests that the Commission also review the Final Development Plan during said special meeting. 9/l/00 ---- Planning Commission"special"meeting. Commission to hold public hearing on the Preliminary and Final Development Plans to include rezoning of the Apache plaza from"C"district to PUD designation. 8/8/00 --- City Council meeting. Council to rehear Preliminary Development Plan(PUD/site specific) to include rezoning of the Apache Plaza from "C" district to PUD designation. 8//22/00 — City Council meeting. Council to hear Final Development Plan(building specific), • findings of fact consistent with approval/denial,and final PUD agreement. The Development Review Committee for this project has been expanded to include:Mayor Cavanaugh,Mike Mornson, Doug Bergstrom,John Shardlow,Bill Soth and me. John Shardlow is the point of contact for this project and is working with City Attorney Soth,Hillcrest,and staff to meet all target dates. It should be noted that the"Critical Path/Important Dates"may change depending on the outcomes of the Council and Commission meetings. Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin Planning Consultant Shardlow City Attorney Soth MEMORANDUM DATE: July 20, 2000 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers Spencer Isom, Assistant City Manager FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager ITEM: CRITICAL PATH/IMPORTANT DATES FOR APACHE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING - UPDATE Ta_arg_et Complete Task 4/27/00 4/27/00 City Manager meets with Jerry Gilligan, Dorsey & Whitney, and Bob Thistle, Springsted, Inc., to review tax increment financing • (TIF) request from Hillcrest Development. 5/2/00 5/2/00 City Manager, Gilligan, Thistle meet with development team to discuss TIF request with Hillcrest. 5115100 5115100 Work session with City Council. 5/17/00 Letter sent to Ramsey County on TIF plan. 6/13/00 6/13/00 City Council/Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) calls for a public hearing on new TIF District and decertify old TIF District. Review business terms with Hillcrest. 6/14/00 6/20/00 . City notifies School Board and County Boards about new TIF District. 6/20/00 6/20/00 Planning Commission reviews TIF plan and makes recommendation to HRA. 6/27/00 6/27/00 Public hearing to adopt business subsidy policy. 7/7/00 7/7/00 Notice of 7/25 hearings faxed to St. Anthony Bulletin. • 7/12/00 7/12/00 Notice of 7/25 hearings P ublished in Bulletin. 7/25/00 Three public hearings by HRA: (1) new TIF District (2) decertify parcels from existing District (3) specific business subsidy agreement with Hillcrest 8/8/00 Council to rehear Preliminary Development Plan (PUD/site specific) toinclude rezoning of the Apache Plaza from "C" district to PUD designation 8/22/00 Council to consider developers agreement, final plan and business subsidy agreements with Hillcrest • • General Fund Budget to Actual Report: June 2000 Expenditures: Mean Average 50% 06/30/2000 Percentage Remaining Budget Y-T-D Balance Scent Budget Mayor/Council $58,000.00 $37,262.35 $20,737.65 64% 36% Intergovernmental Relations $17,450.00 $3,787.53 $13,662.47 22% 78% Cable Franshise $20,500.00 $14,466.12 $6,033.88 7.1% 29% General Management $114,400.00 $56,802.31 $57,597.69 50%.. 50% Elections $22,800.00 $5,004.66 $17,795.34 22% 78% Finance/Insurance $271,700.00 $108,858.80 $162,841.20 40% 60% Finance/Assessing $37,000.00- $1,241.18 $35,758.82 3% 97% Legal $59,800.00 $24,033.60 $35,766.40 40% 60% Engineering/Planning/Zoning $9,100.00 $462.99 $8,637.01 5% 95% City Buildings $98,900.00 $24,420.27 $74,479.73 25% 75% Civil Defense $40,900.00 $18,826.80 $22,073.20 46% 54% Police Protection $1,010,700.00 $459,232.34 $551,467.66 45% 55% Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $474,300.00 $216,109.34 $258,190.66 46% 54% Fire Protection $494,300.00 $227,712.78 $266,587.22 46% 54% Inspections/Building Permits $66,300.00 $24,763.87 $41,536.13 37% 63% Animal Control $5,700.00 $1,160.84 $4,539.16 20% 80% Public Works $420,700.00 $147,544.74 $273,155.26 35% 65% Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $117,400.00 $43,507.17 $73,892.83 37% 63% Tree and Weed Care $30,700.00 $7,455.06 $23,244.94 24% 76% Parks $81,800.00 $38,787.40 $43,012.60 47% 53% Transfers to other Funds $75.000.00 $37,500.00 $37,500.00 50% Total Expenditures $3,527,450.00 $1,498,940.15 $2,028,509.85 42% 58% Stormwater Fund#702 .06/30/2000 Projeted Revenues: Funding Source Revenues-to-Date Street Improvement Bonds $1,700,000.00 $420,152.55 MSA Bonds $400,000.00 $0.00 DNR $3,540,000.00 $1,834,032.97 FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00 Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Storm Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $385,207.61 Storm Sewer City Bonds $1.540.000.00 $0.00 Total Project Budget $8,530,000.00 $3,489,393.13 Other Project Activity: Reserves/Transferfrom Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00 State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27 Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $3,516.75 Met Council $20,000.00 $5,000.00 Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00 Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $29,457.95 Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work $0.00 $26.035.87 Total Revenues $8,831,000.00 $3,853,158.97 06/30/2000 Expenditures: Expenditures-to-Date WSB-Engineering Services $337,367.75 Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35 Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $24,134.19 Purchase of Flood Homes $936,623.13 Flood Relief Grant Program $50,386.30 Private Homes-Dumpsters $1,774.15 Sump Pump $246.64 1999 Street Improvement Project $1,008,832.77 2000 Street Improvement Project $122,772.73 Richard Knutson,Inc-Silver Point Park $1.441.981.41 Total Expenditures $3,926,828.42 Project Balance -$73,669.45 Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70 Total Cash on Hand $109,509.25 EXPENDITURE REPORT 06/30/2000 WSB: Flood.Rellef Grant Program: Project Description: Expenditures Project Description: Expenditures Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 Dennis/Penny Gault.. $10,000.00 Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek- $10,000.00 Stonmwater Task Force $29,243.00 Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE $5,280.00 Stonmwater Engineering $22,011.86 Castle Building&Remodeling-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00 Flood Problem Analysis $27,178.98 L.N.Soding-3460 Penrod Lane $600.00 MCES Grant Application $1,475.25 J&D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00 DNR/FEMA Grants $6,820.50 St.Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00 Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 RlteWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue $390.00 Park Design $147,995.10 Pine Cone Nursery-3460 Penrod Lane $9,222.80 Harding Street Design $32,938.13 Twin Cities Glass Block-2521 W.Armour Terrace $292.50 1/1 Study $20,601.00 Total Flood Relief Program $50,386.30 Flood Grant-1998/1999/2000 $21.297.50 Total WSB $337,367.75 Private Homes-Dumpsters Barr Engineering: Project Description: Project Description: Waste Management $391.65 District#6 Watershed Study $2.709.35 Nancy Myhran $259.50 Total Barr Engineering $2,709.35 Linda Gonler $198.00 Susan Kozarek $925,QQ Dorsey&Whitney: Total Dumpsters $1,774.15 Project Description: Legal Services for Flooding Issues $18,071.16 Legal Services-Comdenation of Homes $1,930.00 Sump Pump Legal Services-Harding Street $1,252.80 Project Description: Legal Services-Pahl Avenue $2.880.23 Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Line $131.00 Total Dorsey&Whitney $24,134.19 Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $115.64 Total Sump Pump/Mist. $246.64 Purchase of Homes: Project Description: 1999 Street Improvement Project Network Title,Inc. $255.00 Project Description: Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 WSB-Engineering Services $168,977.77 Demolition $9,156.00 Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85 Taxes $839.61 Northdale Construction $816,772.32 Legal Services-Dorsey&Whitney $225.00 Treemendous $460.00 Check for Asbestos-Abatement Services $365.00 Moody's Investment Services $3,250.00 Seal&Cap Well $1,450.00 Dorsey 8 Whitney $2,911.55 . Purchase of 2713 St.Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 Bond Issuance Expense $7.625.28 Demolition $11,258.00 Total 1999 Street Project $1,008,832.77 Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Recording Deed/raxes $2,506.98 2000 Street Improvement Project Title Insurance $946.00 Project Description: Seal&Cap Well $1,420:00 WSB-Engineering Services $112,665.54 Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,067.10 Buchen Environmental Services $2,248.99. Purchase of 2700/2704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45 Lillie Suburan Newspaper/Construction Bulletin $232.93 Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $205,528.49 Bond Issuance Expense $7.625.27 First American Title $375.00 Total 2000 Street Project $122,772.73 Evergreen Land Services $3,369.47 Total Purchase of Homes $936,623.13 Silver Point Park/Construction Project Description: Richard Knutson,Inc, $339,159.22 Richard Knutson,Inc, $300,593.77 Richard Knutson,Inc, $130,084.79 Richard Knutson,Inc, $305,667.27 Richard Knutson,Inc, $56,486.88 Richard Knutson,Inc, $50,176.49 Richard Knutson,Inc. $140,028.70. Richard Knutson,Inc, $109,601.19 Trillum Park $10.183.10 Total Payments to Contractors $1,441,981.41 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA July 25, 2000 PAGE(S) I. CALL TO ORDER. II. ROLL CALL. Ill. APPROVAL OF JULY 25, 2000 H.R.A. AGENDA. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ........................................................................... 1 - 6 These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed else_ where on the agenda. • V. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A. ........................................ 7 - 16 A. PUBLIC HEARING - Granting of business subsidy to Hillcrest Development for the redevelopment of Apache Plaza and surrounding parcels ............................................................. 7 - 12 B. Amendment to Tax Increment Financing District#3- Ramsey County (HRA Resolution 2000-008) ........................ 13 - 14 C. Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Area #3 and on the Proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District #5-Ramsey County (HRA Resolution 2000-009) ............................................... 115 - 16 VI. STAFF REPORTS. VII. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS. VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. IX. ADJOURNMENT. IV. CONSENT AGENDA. • Regular HRA Meeting Minutes - June 27, 2000 • Verified Claims 1 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 102 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES 3 June 27, 2000 4 I. CALL TO ORDER. 5 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Cavanaugh at 10:53 p.m. 6 II. ROLL CALL. 7 Commissioners present: Chairman Cavanaugh, Vice Chair Thuesen, Commissioners Sparks 8 Horst, and Hodson. 9 Commissioners absent: None. 10 Also present: Executive Director Michael Morrison. 11 III. APPROVAL OF JUNE 27,2000 H.R.A.AGENDA. 12 Motion by Horst to approve the H.R.A. Agenda of June 27, 2000 as presented. 13 Motion carried unanimously. 14 IV. CONSENT AGENDA. 15 Motion by Horst to approve the Consent Agenda, which included: 06 1 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes of June 13, 2000; and 17 2. Claims for the H.R.A. 18 Motion carried unanimously. 19 V. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A. 20 A. Public Hearing. H.R.A. Resolution 00-007 re: Business Subside 21 Mayor Cavanaugh called the public hearing to order at 11:03 p.m. and requested a report from 22 City Manager Michael Mornson. 23 Morrison reviewed for the Commission that a business subsidy is defined as a"state or local 24 government grant, contribution, subsidized loan, tax or fee reductions or deferrals, any loan or 25 lease guarantee or any preferential use of government facilities." 26 Statute requires governmental agencies awarding business subsidies to establish specific public 27 purpose goals for the subsidies (business subsidy policy) including a wage floor. Morrison 28 directed the Council's attention to a draft business subsidy policy for the St. Anthony H.R.A., 29 which establishes a wage floor of$8.01 per hour. 30 Mayor Cavanaugh called for any response from the audience, and hearing none, closed the public 31 hearing at 11:06 p.m. 02 Motion by Thuesen to approve H.R.A. Resolution 00-077, a Resolution Adopting a Business 33 Subsidy Policy, wherein the St. Anthony Housing and Redevelopment Authority hereby adopts 2 Housing and Redevelopment-Authority Meeting Minutes June 27, 2000 Page 2 1 the City of St. Anthony Business Subsidy Policy attached hereto and on behalf of the City of 2 St.Anthony. 3 Motion carried unanimously. 4 B. Review Business Terms with Hillcrest on Tax Increment Financing Issues. sues. 5 Executive Director Michael Mornson introduced Paul Steinman, Springsted, Public Finance 6 Advisors, and invited him to address the Commission. 7 Mr. Steinman directed the Commission's attention to his memorandum of June 20, 2000, a copy 8 of which is included with the Council's agenda package. 9 Mr. Steinman reviewed the memorandum, which outlined the deal points regarding the Hillcrest 10 redevelopment proposal for the Apache Plaza. Previous discussions with the developer and 11 H.R.A. have resulted in a conceptual project package, which was identified in the memorandum 12 in detail. 13 Various discussion ensued between the Councilmembers and Mr. Steinman regarding the details 14 of the redevelopment proposal. 465 Executive Director Michael Mornson handed out information regarding the Tax Increment Plan, 6 which will be reviewed and considered by the Council on July 25, 2000 at a public hearing. 17 Cavanugh inquired if, as a general practice, a summary or a cover letter of sorts could be 18 included with a document of substantial size in order to guide the Commissioners through the 19 document. 20 Bob Strakoda, an appraiser, approached the Commission and reassured the members that 21 . Hillcrest is working towards the best possible solution and performance for the redevelopment. 22 VI. STAFF REPORTS. 23 None. 24 VII. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS. 25 None. 26 VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 27 None. 28 IX. ADJOURNMENT. 29 Motion by Hodson to adjourn at 11:25 p.m. �0 Motion carried unanimously. Housing and Redevelopment-Authority Meeting Minutes June 27, 2000 • Page 3 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 Sue Selseth 3 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.. • Following are the claims for the July 25, 2000 HRA meeting: 1. Dorsey & Whitney... ...................................$2,240.00 Apache Plaza TIF Matters 2. Dorsey & Whitney... . ..............$1,525.40 Hillcrest Development - Apache Plaza 3. Springsted, Inc.... .......................................$72686.09 Apache Development Study - 2000 4. Firstar Corporate Trust.... ........................... $62,915.00 Apache TIF Bond Payment 5. Firstar Corporate Trust.... ............................... $717.50 Walbon TIF Bond Payment 6. Firstar Corporate Trust.... ........................... $462700.00 Community Center Bond Payment • 7. Midwest Planning & Design...............................$21.25 Review Tuschie Bill 8. Dahlgren Shardlow & Uban.... ........................$5882.97 Comprehensive Planning - Apache Plaza 9. Dahlgren Shardlow & Uban.... .......................$3,408.57 Comprehensive Planning - Apache Plaza 10. Raymond A. Hellickson.... .......................... $10,810.86 TIF Payment to Developer - Hellickson Dental 11. Norwest Investment Services.... ....................$34,006.19 _ Evergreen TIF - Final Payment • • MEMORANDUM DATE: July 14, 2000 TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director ITEM: HELLICKSON ADDITION/TIF PROJECT In July of 1993, the St. Anthony Housing and Redevelopment Authority (H.R.A.) entered into a redevelopment agreement to upgrade an area of the City known as the Hellickson Addition. The intention of the H.R.A. and the City was to assist with redevelopment of the property located at 3901 Silver Lake Road. The objectives of the project included: A. Securing prompt renovation of the property which at the time • included a portion, which was not in use. B. Secure additional employment opportunities. C. Increase the valuation of the property which decreases the tax burden. Pursuant to the contract, the H.R.A. issued a Limited Revenue Tax Increment Note in the amount of $130,000.00 at an interest rate of 9% per annum. Under the terms of the agreement, on August 1st and February 1st of each year, the H.R.A. is to make payment to the developer from tax increment monies generated by the district. The note will mature February 1, 2005 or until payment of the bond is completed. In July, the City received the first half tax settlement for 2000, which included tax increment revenues from the district totaling $12,012.07. Based on the contract the H.R.A. entered into, a payment is now due the developer. Jerry Gilligan from Dorsey & Whitney has confirmed the terms of the agreement. It should be noted that it is recommended that 10% of each year's revenues be retained to cover administrative expenses associated with the project. Recommendation: • The Housing and Redevelopment Authority approve payment to Raymond A. Hellickson in the amount of$10,810.86 ($12,012.07 less admininstration retainage = $10,810.86). MEMORANDUM DATE: July 14, 2000 TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director ITEM: TAX INCREMENT/EVERGREEN TOWNHOMES. In September of 1989, the St. Anthony Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the developer entered into an agreement to develop an area of the City now known as Evergreen Townhomes. Soil correction was financed by tax increment at a cost of$267,000 plus interest. Pursuant to the agreement, any year in which the tax increment should exceed the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the TIF, the H.R.A. shall (commencing 1/1/93) use the excess amount to pay for the cost of the soil correction note. Upon receiving the 2000 first half tax settlement, the TIF District's excess increment totals $33,361.29 and is payable per the agreement. Jerry Gilligan from Dorsey & Whitney has confirmed the terms of the agreement. Total payments included: $ 25,932.00 in 1993 $ 50,173.09 in 1994 $ 59,058.24 in 1995 $ 64,199.17 in 1996 $ 68,260.59 in 1997 $ 69,771.33 in 1998 $ 66,695.58 in 1999 $ 34,006.19 in July - 2000 $438,096.19 Recommendation Council approves the final payment to Norwest Investment Services, Inc. in the amount of $34,006.19 ($1,755.34 interest and $32,250.85 principal). The Evergreen District expires in year 2001. Since the debt will be defeased with this payment, there will be a year and 1/2 of increment remaining for the City to pool the money into the TIF Budget. • VIII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE HRA. • Granting business subsidy to Hillcrest Development • Resolution HRA 2000-008 • Resolution HRA 2000-009 • i 85 E.SEVENTH PLACE,SUITE 100 SAINT PAUL,MN 55101-2887 - 651-223-3000 FAX:651-223-3002 SPRINGSTED Public Finance Advisors VA MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Mornson, City Manager, St. Anthony FROM: Paul T. Steinman, VP Housing & Economic Development DATE: July 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Apache/Hillcrest Redevelopment Project You asked me to analyze the Hillcrest proposal based upon St. Anthony Resolution 95-038 which establishes guidelines for providing monetary assistance for development and redevelopment projects. This analysis'is as follows: PARAMETERS — ST. ANTHONY MONETARY ASSISTANCE RESOLUTION • $10,000 in assistance per$100,000 of new or retained value • $ 5,000 in assistance per full time job created PROPOSED APACHE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT • $20,000,000 in new and retained value projected • Developer could qualify for up to $2 million in assistance • 1,500 potential full time jobs • Developer-could qualify for up to $7.5 million in assistance • SAINT PAUL,MN • MINNEAPOLIS,MN • MILWAUKEE,WI OVERLAND PARK,KS • WASHINGTON,DC a DES MOINES,IA Apache/Hillcrest Redevelopment Project July 14, 2000 Page 2 • Additionally you asked that I provide an analysis of the ratio of public to private funds being proposed for this development. This analysis is as follows: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE FUNDS • $19 million Total project costs • $4.75 million Tax increment (public funds) $14.25 million (private funds) • 1:3 Ratio of public to private funds Generally a 1:3 ratio of public to private funds is appropriate in a redevelopment project that is substandard to the degree of Apache Plaza. That said, the mayor and council, as policy makers, need to determine their level of comfort using this ratio as only one additional piece of data in a very complex project structure cc: Robert D. Thistle, Executive Vice President kli.Mornson —Apache Parameters • • 85 E. SEVENTH PLACE,SUITE 100 SAINT PAUL,MN 55101-2887 651-223-3000 FAX:651-223-3002 SPRINGSTED Public Finance Advisors MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Mornson, City Manager, St. Anthony FROM: Paul T. Steinman, Vice President, Housing & Economic Development CC: Bob Thistle,Senior Vice President DATE: July 17, 2000 SUBJECT: Hillcrest Business Subsidy Agreement • At its n June 27 2000 the Mayor and City Council approved, upon the holding of a 9 � Y Y PP P 9 public hearing, the City's Business Subsidy Policy. Such policy described the circumstances under which the Mayor and Council would approve business subsidies. This action was taken, in part, in anticipation of an incentive being provided as part of the Hillcrest/Apache redevelopment project. The Business Subsidy Agreement will actually be a part (Exhibit D) of the overall Redevelopment Agreement with Hillcrest. Attached to this memo is a draft of the Business Subsidy Agreement. The Business Subsidy Agreement closely mirrors the Business Subsidy Policy, other than describing in detail the actual project anticipated — the Apache Plaza project, in this case. The attached agreement outlines the following major points: • What the proposed subsidy is planned to be used for ➢ Acquisition, environmental remediation, building demolition and storm sewer improvement costs • The amount of the proposed subsidy ➢ $4 million plus an amount yet to be determined to complete storm water improvements as part of the overall project (approximately $500,000? - $750,000?) • SAINT PAUL,MN • MINNEAPOLIS,MN • MILWAUKEE,WI • OVERLAND PARK,KS • WASHINGTON,DC • DES MOINES,IA Hillcrest Business Subsidy Agreement �® July 17, 2000 Page 2 • Public purpose of the proposed subsidy ➢ To redevelop blighted property • Job and wage goals related to the business subsidy ➢ As provided for in the business subsidy law, jobs created and wage levels can be determined by the mayor and council to NOT be a goal of providing the business subsidy—therefor job and wage goals are proposed to be set at zero The fourth bullet point above describes an issue that should receive consideration by the mayor and city council. The issue is: • Should specific job creation and wage goals be set as part of this agreement? The recommendation being set forth in this memo indicates that no specific job and wage goals should be applied. We believe the highest priority is to redevelop the blighted property to achieve the highest and best use. The proposed redevelopment could hardly occur at all without creating significantly more jobs.than are currently located in the facility. Additionally, job and wage goals in this case, which are to be guaranteed by the developer, lie outside of the control of the developer. In the case of the Apache redevelopment, Hillcrest will have little or no control over the number of jobs or wage levels their tenants create within the facility. The mayor and council also may not wish to place these types of goals on the developer because the "high job creation" types of tenants Hillcrest may end up seeking don't • necessarily provide for the highest and best use (and generally higher value) of the property. • 11 EXHIBIT D • BUSINESS SUBSIDY AGREEMENT This Business Subsidy Agreement (this "Agreement") is made as of the day of 2000,between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony,Minnesota(the "Grantor") and Hillcrest Development, (the "Recipient"). In order to satisfy the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sectionsl 16J.993 through 166J.995 (the "Act"), the Recipient.acknowledges and agrees.as follows: 1. Description of the Business Subsidv (a) The Project. The Recipient will be undertaking the following project within the Grantor's area of operation: The acquisition and renovation and rehabilitation of Apache Plaza Shopping Center and related site improvements(the "Project"). (b), Type of Business Subsidy. The Business Subsidy consists of the following assistance to the Recipient for the Project: Tax Increment Financing contribution for land acquisition, environmental remediation and building demolition and assistance for costs of construction of storm sewer improvements(the"Business Subsidy"). (c) Amount of the Business Subsidy. The amount of the Business Subsidy granted to the Recipient under this Agreement has a value of$ . This is based upon a $ Tax Increment contribution, for Public Redevelopment Costs related to the Project and $ for storm sewer improvements to be constructed as part of the Project. (d) Type of Tax Increment Financing District. The Tax Increment District in which the • Project is located is a "redevelopment district" within the meaning of the Tax Increment Financing.Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179. 2. Public Purpose for the Business Subsidy. The public purpose of this Business Subsidy is to redevelop blighted areas. 3. Why the Business Subsidy is Needed. The Business Subsidy is needed because the Grantor is desirous of Recipient undertaking the Project in order to redevelop blighted property in the Grantor's area of operation and the Project is not economically feasible for the Recipient to undertake without the Business Subsidy. 4. Job and Wage Goals for the Business Subsidy. Following a public hearing the Grantor has determined that the creation or retention of jobs is not a goal of providing the Business Subsidy and the wage and job goals for the Business Subsidy are zero. 5. Continued Operations. The Recipient agrees to continue its operations at the location of the Project for at least five years after the Benefit Date. As used herein "Benefit Date" means the date the Business Subsidy is received. The Business Subsidy is for improvements to property, therefore the Benefit Date refers tot he earliest date of either: when the improvement is finished for the entire Project; or when the Recipient occupies the property. 6. Financial Obligation of the Recipient if Does Note Fulfill this Agreement. If the Recipient does not fulfill this Agreement, the Recipient will repay all of the Business Subsidy to the Grantor plus interest ("Interest") set at the implicit price deflator defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.70, Subdivision 2,accruing from and after the Benefit Date,compounded semiannually. D-3 12 Page 4 • 7. Reporting Requirements. (a) The Recipient agrees to furnish to the Grantor on or before March 1 in each year the report required in Section I 16J.994, Subdivision 7 of the Act on forms developed by the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. (b) If the Grantor does not receive the reports, it will mail the Recipient a warning within one week of the required filing date. If within 14 days of the post marked date of the warning the reports are not made, the Recipient agrees to pay to the Grantor a penalty of$100 for each subsequent day until the report is filed up to a maximum of$ 1;000. 8. Parent Corporation. There is no parent corporation for the Recipient. 9. Other Grantors. The following is a list of all financial assistance to be provided by all grantors for the Project:None. 10. Term of Agreement. This Agreement will be in full force and effect until the earlier of the Recipient meeting all of its obligations hereunder or the provisions of the Act no longer apply to the Grantor,the Recipient or the Project, in which case this Agreement will be terminated. The Grantor and Recipient have executed this Agreement as of the date written above. Grantor: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. ANTHONY • By Its Chair By Its Secretary Recipient: HILLCREST DEVELOPMENT By Its adoption: Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its HRA RESOLUTION 2000-008 RESOLUTION RELATING TO AMENDMENT TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3-RAMSEY COUNTY; APPROVING AMENDMENT TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3-RAMSEY COUNTY BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota(the "HRA"), as follows: 1. The HRA and City Council (the "City Council") of the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota (the "City") have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3-Ramsey County (the "Original Redevelopment Plan"), and a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 14, to be designated as Redevelopment Project No. 3-Ramsey County (the "Original Redevelopment Project"), and on March 23, 1993, the HRA and the City Council approved amendments to the Original Redevelopment Plan and Original Redevelopment Project (the Original Redevelopment Plan as so amended is herein called the"Redevelopment Plan" and the Original Redevelopment Project as so amended is herein called the "Redevelopment Project"). In order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, the HRA has approved the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-Ramsey County (the "Financing Plan"), pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, to be designated as Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-Ramsey County (the "District"). It has been proposed that the HRA approve amendments to the Financing Plan designated as "Amendment to Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-Ramsey County" (the "Amendment"), a copy of which has been presented to this Board. The Amendment reduces the geographic area of the District by eliminating certain parcels from the District. 2. The Amendment is hereby approved. 3. The HRA has previously found that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, on the basis that there is reasonably distributed throughout the District the following conditions: (i) parcels consisting of 70% of • the area in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and (ii) more than 50% of the buildings (not including outbuildings) are structurally substandard to a degree requiring 14 substantial renovation or clearance. The HRA finds that the Amendment does not affect such prior finding. 4. The Amendment shall be presented to the City Council for a public hearing on the Amendment pursuant to Minnesota'Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3. Dated the 25' day of July, 2000. Chairman Attest: Executive Director • • -2- 15 Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: HRA RESOLUTION 2000- 009 RESOLUTION RELATING TO 2000-1 AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 3-RAMSEY COUNTY, AND THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5- RAMSEY COUNTY; APPROVING 2000-1 AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 3-RAMSEY COUNTY AND THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO, TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5- RAMSEY COUNTY AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5-RAMSEY COUNTY, AND REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL • BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota (the "HRA"), as follows: 1. The HRA and City Council (the "City Council") of the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota(the "City") have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3-Ramsey County (the"Original Redevelopment Plan"), and a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 14, to be designated as Redevelopment Project No. 3-Ramsey County (the "Original Redevelopment Project'), and on March 23, 1993, the HRA and the City Council approved amendments to the Original Redevelopment Plan and Original Redevelopment Project(the Original Redevelopment Plan as so amended is herein called the "Amended Redevelopment Plan" and the Original Redevelopment Project as so amended is herein called the "Amended Redevelopment Project'). It has been proposed that the HRA approve an amendment to the Amended Redevelopment Plan and Amended Redevelopment Project designated as 2000-1 Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3-Ramsey County (the "2000-1 Amendment," and the Amended Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 2000-1 Amendment is hereinafter referred to as the "Redevelopment Plan," and the Amended Redevelopment Project as amended by the 2000-1 Amendment is hereinafter referred to as the "Redevelopment Project'). The 2000-1 Amendment includes additional property in the area subject to the Redevelopment.Plan and 16 provides for additional redevelopment activities to be undertaken by the City and HRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Project. In order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, it has been further proposed that the HRA approve a tax increment financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, designated as.Tax Increment Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5- . Ramsey County (the "Financing Plan"), which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, to be designated as Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-Ramsey County (the "District'). 2. The 2000-1 Amendment, the Financing Plan and the District are described in the attached documents entitled "2000-1 Amendment to Redevelopment Plan For Redevelopment Project No. 3-Ramsey County and Tax Increment Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5- Ramsey County," and the Redevelopment Project described in the Redevelopment Plan are hereby approved. The Executive Director is further authorized and directed to request the appropriate authorities of Ramsey County to certify the original net tax capacity of the District pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177 following approval of the Financing Plan and District by the St. Anthony City Council in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3. 3. The HRA finds that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, on the basis that there is reasonably distributed throughout the District the following conditions: (i) parcels consisting of 70% of the area in the District • are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and (ii) more than 50% of the buildings (not including outbuildings) are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. In making this determination the HRA has reviewed and is relying on the report of Tom Goodoien, Consulting, included in the 2000-1 Amendment and Financing Plan, and information otherwise available to the HRA. 4. The 2000-1 Amendment was transmitted to the St. Anthony Planning Commission (the "Commission") for its review and opinion. The Commission delivered to the HRA its written opinion on the 2000-1 Amendment. 5. The 2000-1 Amendment, the Financing Plan and the District, together with written opinion of the Commission, shall be presented to the City Council fora public hearing on the 2000-1 Amendment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes;Section 469.028, subdivision 1 and the Financing Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3. Dated the 25' day of July, 2000. Chairman Attest: Executive Director -2-