HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 04272004 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIII IIII
102917
Box: 29
Folder: CC PACKETS 2001-2004
Document: CC PACKET 04272004
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community,
a walkable village, which is safe and secure.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
April 27, 2004
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, Discussion, and Possible Action on All of the Following Items:
I. Approval of the April 27, 2004, City Council Meeting Agenda. Action requested.
I1. Proclamations and Recognitions.
A. Presentation of plaque to City Clerk.
III. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere
on the agenda.
A. Approve April 13, 2004, Regular Council meeting minutes. (pp. 1-12)
B. Licenses and permits. (pp. 13-14)
C. Claims. (pp. 15-17)
IV. Public Hearings for Improvement Project for 39th Avenue NE and for Said
Assessments for the Project. Todd Hubmer, WSB &Associates, Inc., will be present.
Action requested.
A. Resolution 04 - , re: Ordering street and utility improvements. (pp.18-19)
B. Resolution 04 - , re: Confirming assessments. (pp. 20-21)
C. Resolution 04 - , re: Award construction bid. (pp. 22-24)
V. Reports.
A. Presentation of Police Department 2003 Annual Report by Police Chief
Engstrom.
Page 2
B. Presentation of Fire Department 2003 Annual Report by Fire Chief Hewitt.
VI. General Policy Business of the Council.
A. Resolution 04-035,.re: Adopt a hazard mitigation plan. Fire Chief Hewitt will be
present. Action requested. (pp. 25-26)
VII. Reports From City Manager and Councilmembers.
VIII. Community Forum.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular
agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on
the form at the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk's record, and limit
their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on
items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report
or direct that the matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
IX. Information and Announcements.
X. Miscellaneous-Informational Documents.
XI. Adjournment.
' 1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 01
2
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
4
5 APRIL 13, 2004
6
7 CALL TO ORDER
8 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
9
10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
11 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
12
13 ROLL CALL.
14 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Stille, Thuesen, and Faust.
15 Absent: None.
16 Also Present: City Manager Mike.Mornson.
17
18 CONSIDERATION,DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
19 ITEMS.
20
21 I. APPROVAL OF APRIL 13, 2004, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
22 Motion by Councilmember Horst, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to approve the City
23 Council Meeting Agenda of April 13, 2004.
24
25 Friendly amendment by Councilmember Faust to add item 6B, Sister City Stone Sculpture
26 Symposium, and item 6C, Central Park Dedication. Councilmember Horst and Councilmember
27 Thuesen accepted the friendly amendment.
28
29 - Motion carried unanimously.
30
31 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
32 None.
33
34 III. CONSENT AGENDA.
35 A. Approve March 23, 2004, regular Council meeting minutes.
36 B. Consider licenses and permits.
37 C. Consider payment of claims.
38
39 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to approve the Consent
40 Agenda.
41
42 Motion carried unanimously.
43
44 IV. REPORTS.
45 A. Ramsey County Commissioner Jan Wiessner will present Ramsey County matters.
46 Ramsey County Commissioner Wiessner stated she had attended the Bulldozer Bash and
47 complimented Council on"a great event." She added people had many fond memories of
48 Apache Plaza and it was "kind of sad"to see It being demolished.
49
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2004 02
Page 2
1 Commissioner Wiessner provided Council with informational packets, explaining what types of
2 material were included. She indicated she would give highlights regarding the provided
3 information; however, she wanted Councilmembers to have further details available for review at
4 their leisure.
5
6 Commissioner Wiessner stated the budget challenges were the biggest news item, as major
7 decreases in State and Federal budgets, grants, State aid money, etc., had been realized. She
8 noted a summary budget including further details was provided in the packet.
9
10 Commissioner Wiessner indicated the public had a hard time understanding the problems, as
11 Ramsey County had decreased its budget by$20 million; however, its levy was increasing
12 approximately 5.6%,which was caused by the decrease in revenue sources against obligations
13 that had to be funded. She noted significant cuts were made in discretionary items.
14
15 Commissioner Wiessner explained that the County was the arm of the state and responsible for
16 implementation of State laws. She indicated approximately 90% of the County's activities were
17 mandated by State law, which left 10%that was discretionary. She added, unfortunately, much
18 of the discretionary spending went toward preventative items and important services to the
19 communities.
20
21 Commissioner Wiessner stated she wished to remind Council of the services provided by the
22 County, indicating approximately 2/3 of its budget was human services and corrections. She
23 added she "wanted to brag" about Ramsey County's receipt of a Triple A rating and the
24 compliments given to the County for its fiscal management.
25
26 Commissioner Wiessner noted the County had decreased approximately 300 positions; however,
27 it had only experienced 20 layoffs. She added approximately 300 more people working with
28 non-profit organizations lost jobs because of less County spending.
29
30 Commissioner Wiessner indicated she wanted to mention awards received by the County. She
31 stated the County's library system had been recognized as one of the top eight in the nation in
32 communities of similar population. She explained the rating was based on best practices, cost
33 per capita, books per capita, number of employees, etc. She also stated the County's Parks
34 Department was recognized by a national organization as being one of only three Parks and
35 Recreation Departments in the State of Minnesota that was accredited.
36
37 Commissioner Wiessner noted one of the new services available was the acceptance of yard
38 waste in compost sites. She indicated the closest sites for residents of St. Anthony Village were
39 located in Mounds View and Arden Hills.
40
41 Commissioner Wiessner indicated the County's HRA had received a request from Saint Anthony
42 Village for$350,000 and noted the County's staff would be recommending the County provide
43 $350,000 for the new development to be located on the Apache Plaza site. She added the
44 meeting would take place on May 4.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2004 03
Page 3
1 Commissioner Wiessner stated the County continued to work on welfare reform. She explained
2 the government changed all the rules approximately five years earlier; therefore, welfare was no
3 longer an entitlement program but a work program. She indicated those seeking public
4 assistance must be seeking work and they were encouraged to work while receiving training.
5 She added the economy made it difficult for welfare clients to maintain jobs and the decrease in
6 the childcare subsidy program had also been an issue.
7
8 Commissioner Wiessner indicated a handout was in the packet that gave details regarding the
9 2004 road construction projects; however, only a draft was available for the 2004-2005 projects.
10 She noted the County was just finishing its sixth year of work with the Silver Lake Road project,
11 which she added was almost complete.
12
13 Commissioner Wiessner noted the County recently opened its new law enforcement center and
14 was in the process of converting the old one into new market-rate housing apartments, along with
15 development at street level that would include restaurants and retail on Kellogg Boulevard.
16
17 Commissioner Wiessner stated the new jail was open and about one month after it opened the
18 sheriff came to one of the County's Board meetings and announced it was already full. She
19 noted the County had built the jail with a lot of expansion room and had intended to lease out
20 beds. She explained there were no plans to expand the jail, as the County was trying to live
21 within the available space. She added there was a lot of pent-up demand and, once the space was
22 available,judges began sentencing people instead of giving probation.
23
24 Commissioner Wiessner indicated another development in progress was the public works facility
25 on Highway 96, which was scheduled to open in October. She explained the County had
26 collaborated with the Mounds View School District, City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County library
27 system and the Watershed District; and each of these entities would be sharing space in the
28 building. She added a new sheriff's patrol station, which was a"little controversial,"would also
29 be at the new building. She stated this was a$36 million project that was "on time and under
30 budget." She noted some of Council had visited the County's old site on Rice and 694 that was
31 "past the point of needing to be replaced."
32
33 Commissioner Wiessner noted facts and figures regarding the Corrections Department were in
34 the provided packet. She stated the County was proud of its low recidivism rate.
35
36 Commissioner Wiessner indicated information was also included regarding the new suburban
37 court facility, which had been controversial for many years. She explained there were five
38 suburban court locations until a negotiated agreement was made that Ramsey County would
39 consolidate the courts from five to two. She stated, over time, the suburban facility had been
40 overcrowded and during the past year judges were suggesting the suburban facility be
41 eliminated; however, the County convinced them it would be good to keep the locations but
42 make improvements to the facility. She indicated a more central location was currently being
43 sought.
44
1 1
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 04
April 13, 2004
Page 4
1 Commissioner Wiessner stated the County was looking for a community to donate land to the
2 County for the suburban court. She added she was not sure if St. Anthony Village had received a
3 request. She noted a location had not been identified at the present time.
4
5 Commissioner Wiessner encouraged County residents to go to the County's website at
6 www.co.ramsey.nin.us.
7
8 Councilmember Faust stated he wanted to echo Commissioner Wiessner's information about
9 bringing yard waste to a compost site location. He added residents could now take branches to
10 the sites for recycling, which would save each homeowner approximately$65 per year.
11
12 Councilmember Faust indicated he had served on a jury within the last month and felt the
13 process was handled in a great manner, which included excellent security, coordination and
14 cooperation. He stated it was a good experience and asked Ms. Wiessner to inform the County
15 staff that they had done a wonderful job. Commissioner Wiessner responded she would pass on
16 Councilmember Faust's praise and noted, as of July 1, the employees would be State employees
17 rather than County employees.
18
19 Commissioner Wiessner stated one of the County's budget challenges had been additional
20 courthouse security after September 11, 2001. She indicated the County Board discussed
21 removing security from every door; however, the judges gave the County a court order
22 demanding the security be left intact. She added this was one of those mandated items the
23 County had to provide as a host of the court system.
24
25 Mayor Hodson thanked Commissioner Wiessner for her thorough presentation.
26
27 Mayor Hodson asked Commissioner Wiessner if she had followed the .08 designation in the
28 Legislature. Commissioner Wiessner responded it appeared there was a bill in both the House
29 and Senate and the County's position was to support the .08 designation if funding was provided
30 to enforce it, as more people would be arrested and supervised by the County. She added the
31 County felt it was a good law but it would add additional costs to the County.
32
33 Commissioner Wiessner indicated Senator Marty had introduced a bill to have the money
34 transferred from a tax on liquor sales set to sunset in 2005 to local governments for chemical
35 dependency treatment and implementation of enforcement laws. She stated she understood the
36 Senate was supportive and the House was not, as the House saw the transfer as a new tax. She
37 noted the transfer was only the continuation of an existing tax. She added it appeared the House
38 and Senate would pass the .08 designation and the question was what year it would be
39 implemented.
40
41 Mayor Hodson stated he thought a funding source should be provided, as transportation funds
42 could be lost if the law was not enforced. Commissioner Wiessner responded the Federal
43 government was currently withholding transportation dollars. She added it was suggested some
44 of that money be used for enforcement; however, it was specifically slated for highways. She
45 noted the State did use some of those funds for troopers but, unfortunately, none of the money
46 would"trickle down" to local governments.
1 1
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2004 05
Page 5
1
2 Commissioner Wiessner noted one of the things with which she had been involved was trying to
3 "put our finger in the dyke"to keep more demands from coming to the County. Councilmember
4 Faust responded Council would like to give its support to any mutually interesting issues and
5 suggested Commissioner Wiessner allow it to help by possibly bringing "force to bear" at critical
6 points.
7
8 Commissioner Wiessner indicated one issue that had just surfaced was inverse condemnation,
9 which stated if a City decided to go with organized collection for garbage it would have to
10 reimburse all the deposed haulers for any potential business they had lost. She added cities
11 currently had the authority to make these decisions on their own and she felt this item took too
12 much power away from local governments.
13
14 Commissioner Wiessner indicated there was legislation that stated a city would have to pay the
15 opposing legal fees when using eminent domain if there was a difference of 15%to 20%
16 between the City's appraisal and the appraisal of the property owner. She stated she was
17 concerned the outcome would be an automatic increase in the_property owner's appraised value
18 so the City would have to pay attorney fees.
19
20 Councilmember Thuesen noted,regarding refuse haulers, the City explored if it was better to
21 contract with one hauler or let residents make their own choices. He stated he was amazed at
22 how emotional the issue of hauling trash could become.
23
24 Councilmember Thuesen indicated he wished to comment on the Silver Lake Road process, as
25 he commiserated with those who drove it on a regular basis. He noted it would be a great
26 roadway, however, when completed. Commissioner Wiessner responded it had been a"long
27 road, so to speak," as last year whatever could go wrong did go wrong. She added she was
28 pleased it was nearly done.
29
30 Commissioner Wiessner stated she wanted to encourage those with questions to call, as Ramsey
31 County had an excellent staff that was very responsive and eager to help the local communities.
32 She added the County would like to find a way to help St. Anthony Village with the Apache
33 Plaza issue, if possible.
34
35 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
36 A. Review proposed 2005 City budget.
37 Mayor Hodson noted Council typically did an early review of the next year's fiscal budget.
38
39 City Manager Mornson noted this was the fifth year the City had conducted an early review, as it
40 wished to receive public input at an earlier date. He indicated the following points of interest in
41 the 2005 budget: 2% increase in salaries/wages adjustments, higher health insurance
42 contributions in two of the three unions, the City had not reached a settlement with its police
43 union, capital equipment funding was stable because liquor stores were out of service and most
44 of the proceeds from the liquor store paid for capital equipment.
45
46 Mr. Mornson indicated additional expenditures were summarized as follows:
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13,2004 06
Page 6
1 1. With the opening of Central Park, the City could incur increased costs that might require
2 additional funds be allocated to Parks. Costs for maintenance,ballfield lights and higher
3 usage could impact the Parks budget.
4 2. The City agreed to fund a portion of the recreation costs that Community Services
5 provided. Previously, the school levied for this funding; however, recent legislation
6 eliminated the school from doing so. Mr. Mornson estimated a cost of$52,175.
7 3. The 2004 street project would reflect an increase in the road levy, which would be
8 collectible in 2005.
9
10 Mr. Mornson noted the following changes in City revenues:
11 1. Lease with Sprint Communications for$16,200.
12 2. During the construction phase of Apache, revenues from permits could significantly
13 increase. Mr. Mornson indicated consideration could be given to using this revenue for
14 capital equipment or reduction of the levy.
15 3. The City currently received $76,800 per year in lease revenue from Tires Plus; however,
16 after September 1 the City would no longer receive those funds.
17 4. The profits from the liquor store by New Market were minimal. He explained Liquor
18 Operations contributed$100,000 toward the funding of capital equipment in previous
19 years; however, this amount had been reduced to reflect the change in the liquor stores
20 and the funds would not be available for use in 2005. He added the opening of the new
21 SAV I was scheduled for May/June of this year with projected 2004 profits from
22 operations of$175,000. He noted the amount of these profits would cover the 2004
23 general fund transfer.
24 5. The City had not used much of the revenue from the Tires Plus lease; therefore, the HRA
25 fund balance had been increased. Mr. Mornson stated there was a possibility that some
26 of the money could be transferred to help balance the budget. He added consideration
27 was also being made to use the money to pay for the electronic signs, if the City did not
28 get the money from organizations from which it was soliciting.
29
30 Mr. Mornson proposed the following calendar dates:
31 1. Staff would have until July 1 to plan their budgets and present those budgets to Finance
32 Director Larson and Mr. Mornson.
33 2. On August 10 staff would present the 2005 budget to Council. Mr. Mornson noted a
34 work session might be held prior to the regular meeting.
35 3. On September 14 resolutions would be passed setting the proposed 2004 tax levy and
36 budget and setting public hearing and reconvening dates.
37 4. Truth-in-Taxation hearings would be needed in December.
38
39 Councilmember Thuesen asked if Mr. Mornson felt there would be problems for the Fire
40 Department to have its budget ready by July, as its fire chief was leaving. Mr. Mornson
41 responded he did not think there would be a problem, as the majority of the budget was the
42 personnel needed to respond to service calls.
43
44 Mayor Hodson opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 07
April 13, 2004
Page 7
1 Councilmember Horst asked where the money for the protected costs for Central Park would
2 come from the 2005 budget. Mr. Morrison responded money was available in a Park
3 Maintenance, Tree and Weed Fund, along with the Public Works budget. He noted staff would
4 be monitoring the park use in the evenings and electric costs would probably be billed to the
5 street lighting funds within the Public Works budget.
6
7 Councilmember Horst stated it was his understanding the cost would be an additional $25,000
8 per year. Mr. Morrison agreed.
9
10 Councilmember Horst indicated the Public Works and Maintenance budgets did not reflect that
11 amount, as they only showed an increase of approximately$13,000. Mr. Morrison responded the
12 $13,000 amount was "thrown in there for discussion purposes." He indicated staff was not sure
13 of the costs now that the park was open. He added he had been informed the Community
14 Director was adding a fee for use of the lights when tournaments were held or groups used the
15 facility.
16
17 Mayor Hodson noted the majority of events would be baseball or soccer games and lights would
18 not be needed until toward the end of the games. Mr. Morrison added he believed there was a
19 curfew with a timer on the lights; however, he was not sure when that was.
20
21 Mayor Hodson asked if any residents wished to address Council regarding this issue. No one
22 came forward.
23
24 Mayor Hodson closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m.
25
26 VI. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
27 A. Agreement with School District for a recreation program.
28 City Manager Morrison noted this Agreement was between the City and School District for the
29 operation of recreation programs. He indicated the points to note in the Agreement were as
30 follows:
31 1. An Advisory Council would set the direction of Community Services and a City
32 Councilmember would serve as liaison to the Advisory Council.
33 2. Community Services would be responsible for the scheduling and administration of the
34 program.
35 3. $52,175 per year commencing January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2006, would be
36 paid to the School District.
37
38 Mr. Morrison stated the City had been working on this Agreement with the School District for
39 almost six months. He explained the School District had been allowed a grandfather levy from
40 the State for the last 30 years; however, due to budget cuts, the School District no longer had the
41 ability to levy the $52,175. He added Council was agreeing to provide funding for 2005 and
42 2006 fiscal years and the School Board would entertain the Agreement the following Tuesday.
43
44 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Horst, to approve the
45 Agreement between St. Anthony-New Brighton School District#282 and the City of St. Anthony
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2004 0$
Page 8
1 Village to provide an annual payment of$52,175 commencing January 1, 2005, through
2 December 31, 2006.
3
4 Discussion:
5
6 Mayor Hodson suggested available options should be explored with adjoining communities, for
7 example.
8
9 Councilmember Faust asked if this had ever been explained to the public. He requested
10 Councilmember Horst give an explanation.
11
12 Councilmember Horst indicated 30 years ago cities across the State entered into an agreement
13 that the State would allow school districts to levy for park and recreation programs,which were
14 handled through the School District and Community Services; however, during budget cuts the
15 Governor disallowed that levy authority. He stated the City was asked to "fill in the gap,"which
16 it did. He added the City was currently asked to provide funding for an additional period, during
17 which time the City would explore if the funding should be made available on a permanent basis.
18 He stated different options would be investigated that could accomplish the same thing.
19
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21
22 B. Sister City Stone Sculpture Symposium.
23 Councilmember Faust explained the Sister City Association entered into an agreement with
24 International Sister City and State Sister City to do a stone sculpture symposium next summer.
25 He indicated a letter was received in February from the City's Sister City Association indicating
26 they had decided last fall to participate with the State City Association and the Sister City Stone
27 Sculpture Symposium in 2005. He noted the sculptures would be placed in public places in
28 sister cities statewide.
29
30 Councilmember Faust indicated the City's sister city, Salo(?), Finland, would be asked for a
31 master stone sculptor and St. Anthony Village would be asked to find a location for the
32 sculpture. He noted a motion needed to be made agreeing to find a site yet to be determined,
33 which would allow Councilmember Horst to go to the Sister City Association with the message
34 that the City would find a place for the sculpture.
35
36 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to affirm to the Sister City
37 Association that the City of St. Anthony would identify a site for the installation of a sculpture
38 completed through the Sister City Stone Sculpture Symposium.
39
40 Discussion:
41
42 Mayor Hodson noted the City had several options. Councilmember Faust suggested a site not be
43 chosen at this point, as only an affirmation that the City was going to find a site was needed. He
44 indicated his motion was only committing to a space of land on public property for the sculpture.
45
1 1
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 09
April 13, 2004
Page 9
1 Councilmember Stille asked if the City had any input regarding what the sculpture would be. .
2 Councilmember Horst responded it would be tasteful and made by a master sculptor from
3 Salo(?). He added he did not think the City would have trouble finding an appropriate location. :
4
5 Councilmember Faust stated his experience with the Sister City indicated the sculpture would be
6 modernistic and represent the Country of Finland and the United Stated, specifically Salo(?) as it
7 related to St. Anthony Village. He noted the City did have a Council representative on the Board
8 of Directors who would have input.
9
10 Motion carried unanimously.
11
12 C. Central Park Dedication.
13 Councilmember Faust noted the Parks Commission and Council held a joint meeting the
14 previous evening and both bodies felt it was appropriate to plan some form of dedication for the
15 nearly completed Central Park project. He stated Council was asked to move that the Central
16 Park Dedication be held on Tuesday, June 29, 2004, and the Parks Commission must submit a
17 plan, for approval, to Council not later than May 31, 2004.
18
19 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to approve scheduling
20 the Central Park Dedication for Tuesday, June 29, 2004, and requiring the Parks Commission to
21 submit a plan, for approval, to Council not later than May 31, 2004.
22
23 Discussion:
24
25 City Manager Morrison asked if June 29 had been set as a firm date at the joint meeting.
26 Councilmember Faust responded it was a firm date now.
27
28 Councilmember Thuesen indicated his sense from the Park Commission was that June 29 was an
29 appropriate date.
30
31 Councilmember Stille added the only thing he heard was that the Commission wanted to be sure
32 the pavilion was available on June 29. He stated he doubted Tuesday night would be busy and
33 noted the date could be changed if June 29 did not work.
34
35 Councilmember Thuesen indicated he hoped Commissioner Wiessner would have a free hour
36 that evening.
37
38 Motion carried unanimously.
39
40 VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
41 City Manager Morrison reported the following:
42 ■ Barb Suciu had been appointed the new City Clerk and she would begin her duties on
43 May 3, 2004.
44 ■ Joel Hewitt, Fire Chief for the last four years,had resigned to take a position with the
45 Moorhead Fire Department. Mr. Mornson stated he was currently conducting an internal
46 posting with the Fire Department.
1
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2004 10
Page 10
1 City of Lauderdale and City of Falcon Heights would approve the new police contracts
2 for 2005 and 2006 in April, which indicated the City of St. Anthony Village would
3 provide police protection for the two cities. He added this issue would come before
4 Council in May.
5 The new Public Works facility would be completed by the end of April and dedicated in
6 June. Mr. Morrison added it was currently 90% complete and would probably be
7 occupied by the end of April.
8 Construction of the new Fire Station was underway and November 1 was the estimated
9 date for completion.
10 ■ Completion of the first new liquor store would be approximately May 20, with the
11 customer appreciation/grand opening scheduled for June 21 to June 25. Mr. Morrison
12 indicated a dedication was being considered for June 24. He noted the restaurant permit
13 application had been made, with a scheduled completion in May. He added the Amcon
14 Agreement was not yet signed by Spectators and explained Amcon would build the shell
15 of the building and Spectators would complete the interior. He noted the City would be
16 going through its first liquor license application and each individual application would
17 require a public hearing.
18
19 Mr. Morrison indicated the following activities related to Silver Lake Village:
20 ■ 39th Avenue bid opening was April 20, which would include sewer and water
21 improvements. He explained the project would be completed in two phases due to the
22 money flow.
23 ■ Property owners meeting was April 22. He indicated the majority of the funding came
24 from the developers; however, those who benefited from the improvements would be
25 assessed.
26 ■ Public hearing was April 27.
27 ■ Design meetings were scheduled every Tuesday at 1:00 p.m. He explained the reason for
28 the meetings was to review the site plan and building materials when a building permit
29 application was received to make sure the materials met City standards and the design
30 guidelines put in place.
31 ■ Office staff meetings were scheduled for every Tuesday at 2:30 p.m.
32 ■ Full development meetings were scheduled for every other Thursday at Ehlers and
33 Associates.
34 ■ Final plans for the second liquor store were basically complete. He explained a Purchase
35 Agreement would be signed, as the development team was going to buy the Tires Plus
36 building from the City and, in return, would build anew store with a pad,which would be
37 tax exempt because the pad would be owned by the City.
38 ■ Pratt/Hunt and Dominion would appear before the Planning Commission for the final
39 PUD in June or July and housing construction could begin in October. He asked
40 Commissioner Wiessner to let staff know about the mentioned $350,000 as soon as
41 possible, as it would impact the City's budget.
42 ■ Demolition began on April 8.
43 ■ Four separate public meetings regarding condemnations would be needed in May.
44
45 Councilmember Horst stated he had no report.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 7 7
April 13,2004
Page 11
1 Councilmember Stille noted the Huskies' baseball team had its home opener on May 8, 2004.
2 He indicated the City would also be dedicating the park on May 8, which would include the
3 baseball field, with some form of opening ceremonies. He asked for calls to Dave Halstengaard
4 at 612-781-7619 suggesting names for consideration to throw the opening ball. He added the
5 game started at 2:00 p.m.; however,he was not sure what time the ceremony would start.
6
7 Councilmember Thuesen stated he had no report.
8
9 Councilmember Faust noted residents would be receiving the spring Village Notes within the
10 next few days and he encouraged everyone to read it cover to cover. He stated he wanted to
11 compliment City Manager Mornson and the City's staff on the great job they did providing
12 information to the public. He added the newsletter was bi-monthly and recapped everything that
13 happened at the City Council meetings.
14
15 Councilmember Faust indicated May 1 was Cleanup Day. He noted the Village Notes gave the
16 rates and Cleanup Day provided a"good way to get the City cleaned up and looking good."
17
18 Councilmember Thuesen stated he was glad Councilmember Faust had mentioned the newsletter.
19 He indicated the information was presented in an excellent manner and was the "best newsletter
20 put out so far."
21
22 Mayor Hodson stated this was a busy time, especially with media"up and down Silver Lake
23 Road." He thanked those who were answering calls and"putting it all together" and noted he
24 had heard many complimentary comments regarding the redevelopment of Apache Plaza. He
25 indicated the City had a lot of"hard lifting"in the next few months and thanked staff and
26 Council for being so well prepared. He added this would be well worth the effort in the long run.
27
28 VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM.
29
30 Mayor Hodson noted he continued to receive e-mails, along with many questions from residents.
31 He encouraged residents to continue asking questions, as communication was a critical piece of
32 what the City was trying to accomplish.
33
34 No one came forward to address Council.
35
36 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
37 None.
38
39 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
40 None.
41
42 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
43 Mayor Hodson adjourned the meeting at 8:12 p.m.
44
45
46 Respectfully submitted,
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 12
April 13,2004
Page 12
1 Respectfully submitted,
2
3
4 Marjorie R. Jenkins
5 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
6
7
8 Mayor
9 ATTEST:
10 City Clerk
1 '
13
Saint Anthony Village -
DATE: April 27, 2004 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
General Contractors License:
Pioneer Tree& Landscaping Inc.,Pierz, MN
Kemling Aluminum Products, Ottertail,MN
Leroy Signs,Brooklyn Park, MN
Pascual Signs, Maple Grove,MN
Heating and Air Conditioning License:
Quality Refrigeration, Richfield,MN
14
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: April 27, 2004 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Liquor Licenses &Permits for Approval:
Temporary 3.2 Beer Permit:
Therres/Graduation Party
Central Park
Sunday, June 6, 2004
10:00 a.m. —5:00 p.m.
Ennen Family Picnic
Central Park
Sunday, September 5, 2004
Noon—6:00 p.m.
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
04/21/2004 10: Check Register GL540R-V06.60 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
000020 AA BATTERY CO 22403 04/28/04 42.55
008964 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 22404 04/28/04 146.24
008471 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 22405 04/28/04 54.06
008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 22406 04/28/04 1,515.00
009057 ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC MA 22407 04/28/04 20.00
008255 AVAYA, INC. 22408 04/28/04 29.32
000320 BEISSWENGER APPLIANCE 22409 04/28/04 68.93
009060 BLAINE LOCK & SAFE INC. 22410 04/28/04 434.75
007253 BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHO 22411 04/28/04 56.00
007157 BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC 22412 04/28/04 38.52
00001 BRUNACINI/ALAN V. 22413 04/28/04 3,632.15
000520 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS 22414 04/28/04 287.93
002360 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNE 22415 04/28/04 1,261.80
00002 CHRISTENSON/MICHAEL 22416 04/28/04 6.84
009056 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 22417 04/28/04 10,764.80
008577 CITY OF ST. PAUL 22418 04/28/04 202.48
008950 COMCAST 22419 04/28/04 4.68
007371 DISCOUNT STEEL, INC. 22420 04/28/04 63.14
000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY 22421 04/28/04 2,830.65
008825 ED M. FELD EQUIPMENT CO. 22422 04/28/04 122.00
009061 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TEC 22423 04/28/04 61.77
008153 FILTERFRSH 22424 04/28/04 71.18
008221 FOSTER,WENTZELL,HEDBACK, 22425 04/28/04 5,000.00
008647 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 22426 04/28/04 21.33
00003 FRECHETTE/PHYLLIS 22427 04/28/04 2.19
009055 FREEWAY TOWING 22428 04/28/04 159.76
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 22429 04/28/04 272.37
001110 GENERAL IND SUPPLY 22430 04/28/04 16.61
007059 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERV 22431 04/28/04 525.00
008944 HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT 22432 04/28/04 1,049.41
008342 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE 22433 04/28/04 59.10
008252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 22434 04/28/04 363.64
008658 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, I 22435 04/28/04 76.50
00004 KUBISZEWSKI/JUDY M. 22436 04/28/04 157.00
002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 22437 04/28/04 81.38
008254 LMCIT % BERKLEY ADMINIST 22438 04/28/04 5,609.52
008229 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 22439 04/28/04 248.53
002130 MAMA 22440 04/28/04 18.00
008710 MATRX MEDICAL INC. 22441 04/28/04 100.75
008263 MCLEOD USA, INC. 22442 04/28/04 209.39
.00001 METRO SYSTEMS 22443 04/28/04 320.52
008074 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGE 22444 04/28/04 23.00
008326 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 22445 04/28/04 93.23
008993 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ' 22446 04/28/04 89.74
008820 NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY, 22447 04/28/04 133.13
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 22448 04/28/04 154.64
001230 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC. 22449 04/28/04 87.95
008528 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES 22450. 04/28/04 285.00
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
04/21/2004 10: Check Register GL540R-VO6.60 PAGE 2
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
007366 PARTS MIDWEST, INC. 22451 04/28/04 33.21
008970 PIPE SERVICES CORPORATIO 22452 04/28/04 2,169.30
004492 QWEST 22453 04/28/04 245.79
008462 RAMSEY COUNTY 22454 04/28/04 4,704.84
008963 REED BUSINESS INFORMATIO 22455 04/28/04 275.04
003350 SEH 22456 04/28/04 236.52
003315 SL-SERCO 22457 04/28/04 1,000.00
008214 SNYDER DRUG 22458 04/28/04 65.09
008920 T.C. FIELD & COMPANY 22459 04/28/04 1,305.00
00003 THOMPSON HOMES, INC. 22460 04/28/04 20,239.47
008908 THOMPSON HOMES, INC. 22461 04/28/04 54,308.04
007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 22462 04/28/04 321.40
003560 TRACY PRINTING 22463 04/28/04 3,584.00
004481 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY 22464 04/28/04 159.11
009023 US INTERNET 22465 04/28/04 50.00
008858 VEIT & COMPANY 22466 04/28/04 5,488.71
008227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEV 22467 04/28/04 122.20
009037 VIRGO CATERING 22468 04/28/04 675.00
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 22469 04/28/04 56.71
008273 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. 22470 04/28/04 20,847.65
002680 XCEL ENERGY 22471 04/28/04 11,537.31
007325 YOCUM OIL COMPANY, INC. 22472 04/28/04 1,526.82
008492 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC 22473 04/28/04 285.95
BREMER BANK NA 166,109.64 ***
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
04/19/2004 07: Check Register GL540R-V06.60 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008964 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 23216 04/28/04 59.76
009058 AMERICAN BOTTLING COMPAN 23217 04/28/04 64.00
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 23218 04/28/04 10,200.38
000610 CATCO 23219 04/28/04 136.06
002380 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNE 23220 04/28/04 540.98
004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO., 23221 04/28/04 204.60
008814 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE 23222 04/28/04 23.43
004106 CREATIVE MARKETING 23223 04/28/04 494.87
004120 EAGLE WINE CO 23224 04/28/04 9,824.62
004125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 23225 04/28/04 7,133.50
004172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC. 23226 04/28/04 248.00
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 23227 04/28/04 22,085.44
004207 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 23228 04/28/04 311.50
008860 JCDK TELECOMM INC 23229 04/28/04 370.00
004220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 23230 04/28/04 49,943.81
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 23231 04/28/04 10,551.45 .,
008434 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI 23232 04/28/04 20.00
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 23233 04/28/04 4,685.85
004263 MARKET AMERICA CORP. 23234 04/28/04 240.00
004299 MPLS. OXYGEN CO. 23235 04/28/04 5.07
005232 MURPHY'S SERVICE CENTER 23236 04/28/04 14.38
007159 NAPA AUTO PARTS 23237 04/28/04 6.06
008883 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY 23238 04/28/04 534.00
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 23239 04/28/04 63.02
004354 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 23240 04/28/04 1,060.45
004360 PHILLIPS WINE 6 SPIRITS 23241 04/28/04 23,321.76
004361 PINNACLE DIST. 23242 04/28/04 658.07
004376 PRIOR WINE CO 23243 04/28/04 4,745.42
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 23244 04/28/04 20,861.44
008219 QWEST DEX 23245 04/28/04 196.00
008983 SOULO DESIGN, INC 23246 04/28/04 130.00
008969 STAN MORGAN 6 ASSOCIATES 23247 04/28/04 14,468.03
008470 SUN NEWSPAPERS 23248 04/28/04 1,560.00
008920 T.C. FIELD 6 COMPANY 23249 04/28/04 195.00
.00001 THE DAMA CO. 23250 04/28/04 179.46
009059 VALUEWEB 23251 04/28/04 59.85
008316 WINE COMPANY/THE 23252 04/28/04 244.05
008310 WINE MERCHANTS INC 23253 04/28/04 1,619.79
004499 WORLD CLASS WINES, INC. 23254 04/28/04 198.00
002680 XCEL ENERGY 23255 04/28/04 960.50
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 188,218.60 ***
ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
Public Hearings.
In keeping with Roberts Rules of Order, the following
procedures apply to Public Hearings:
• Mayor/Chair asks for staff report on item and opens item.
for discussion.
• Citizens wishing to speak, should raise their hands and
approach the podium when recognized by the
Mayor/Chair, then clearly state full name and address for
the record. Spokespersons are given more time for
presentations, and groups are encouraged to use them.
• Everyone who wishes, will have a chance to address the
Council/Commission. Citizens must address all questions
and comments to the Mayor, who will then determine who
will answer them. Questions will be answered when all
persons have had a chance to speak. Only one person
may speak at a time. Citizens are urged to be polite and
quiet as comments are made to the Council/Commission.
Applauding or other displays of approval or disapproval
are inappropriate during City Council/Planning
Commission proceedings.
• No one will be given an opportunity to speak a second time
until everyone has had an opportunity to speak initially.
Please limit second presentation to new information and
not rebuttals.
When public comments are completed, the
Council/Planning Commission closes the public hearing
and starts its own discussion. The audience is welcome to
listen quietly to the discussion but is requested not to
make comments.
18
rates,Inc. April 22, 2004
The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff
c/o Michael Morrison
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418-1603
Re: Resolutions for the 39"'Avenue Street and Utility Improvement Project
St. Anthony Village,MN
=rt WSB Project No. 1065-85
Dear Mr. Mayor, City Council, and Staff-
' Following this letter are three resolutions for your consideration at the April 27, 2004 Council Meeting.
The three resolutions should be considered following the public hearing which was ordered at the March
23, 2004 Council Meeting.
The three resolutions for your consideration are:
I. A Resolution Ordering Improvements
This resolution states that the Council has completed the public hearing process and
orders the project to be completed.
II. A Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for the Various Public
' Improvements
Attached to the Resolution are the assessments which have been calculated in
accordance with the City's assessment policy for the 39`h Avenue Street and Utility
:- Improvement Project. This resolution declares the amount to be assessed at$2,205,000
and outlines the assessment process in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter
429.
III. A Resolution Awarding a Bid for Phase 1: 391h Avenue Street and Utility
Improvements
This resolution awards the contract for the Phase 1: 39h Avenue street reconstruction
project to the lowest bidder. A tabulation of these bidders, as well as the low bidder of
Veit&Company, Inc. with a bid amount of$399,999, can be seen in the Council
packet.
. If you have any questions, I will be present at the April 27, 2004 Council Meeting to discuss those with
° - you or please call me at 763-287-7182.
Sincerely,
v
,415 WSB&Associates,Inc.
Me
Suit
i" odd E. Hubmer, P.E.
in Associate
4
Attachments
7 F:\WPWIN\1065-85\Resolutions\042204 Mayor City Staf£doc
763 Minneapolis• St.Cloud • Equal Opportunity Employer
L
19
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-036
A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted on the 23rd day of March 2004, fixed a
date for Council hearing on the proposed improvements:
39`h AVENUE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
This project consists of street reconstruction, new construction, and replacement of water main,
sanitary sewer, and storm sewer on 39th Avenue NE from Stinson Boulevard to Silver Lake
Road.
WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice in advance of said
hearing was given and the hearing was held thereon on the 27th day of
April 2004, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an
opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
approves such improvements as are hereby ordered in the Council Resolution.
Adopted this day of ,
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
F.IWPWINI1065-851Resolutions104-036 ordering improvements.doc
20
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-037
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR
39" AVENUE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for various public
improvements is:
First Year
Years First Year Levy Collectible Assessed
15 2004 2005 $2,205,000
For improvements to 39th Avenue NE from Stinson Boulevard to Silver Lake Road
against every assessable lot,piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly
calculated upon the basis of benefits,without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly published, as
required by law that this Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all
objections, if any, and said proposed assessment has at all time since its filing been open
for public inspection and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to
present their objections if any, to such proposed assessments.
2. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, finds that each of
the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was and is
specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount
of the assessment set opposite the description of each such lot,piece and parcel of land
respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective
lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described.
3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special
assessments for each of said lots,pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the
assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate calculated at 2% over the
prime rate at the time of assessment per annum accruing on the full amount thereof
unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The
total amount of each such assessment not pre-paid shall be payable in equal annual
principal installments extending over a period of years, as indicated in each case. The
first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment for the period of
January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004 will be payable with general taxes for the
levy year of 2004 collectible in 2005, and one of each of the remaining installments,
together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, will be payable
with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid.
4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification, make
payments (partial or full) towards the balance owed. The owner may, at any time after
F:\WPWMI065-85\Resolutions\04-037adoptingconfirming assessments.doc
21
certification,pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, except that no interest be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November
30th of the assessment year.
5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be,prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a
certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each
unpaid assessment set forth separately,to be extended upon the property tax lists of the
County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner
provided by law.
Adopted this day of 32004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
F:\WPWIN\1065-85\Resolutions\04-037adoptingconfirming assessments.doc
dY�sB 22
mites,Inc.
April 22, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
c/o Mike Mornson
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Re: Phase 1, 39th Avenue Reconstruction
:. Storm Sewer, Watermain, Sanitary Sewer and Appurtenant Work
City of St. Anthony Village, MN
WSB Project No. 1065-85
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Bids were received for the above-referenced project on April 20, 2004, and were opened
and read aloud. A total of four bids were received. The bids were checked for
mathematical accuracy and tabulated. Please find enclosed the bid tabulation indicating
the low bidder as Veit& Company, Inc., 14000 Veit Place, Rogers, MN 55374, in the
amount of$399,999.00.
We recommend that the City Council consider these bids and award a contract to Veit &
f
Company, Inc.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
odd E. Hub er, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosures
,5 cc: Jay Hartman, City of St. Anthony
Me Veit & Company, Inc.
Suit
in Sm
in
4
7
763 Minneapolis • St.Cloud • Equal Opportunity EmpM1065-85\recmmdtn ltr.doc
L
23
"�' BID-T�AB�U�L.A�TL`ON`.SU'llllII`��R�Y .:
PROJECT:
Phase 1, 39th Avenue Reconstruction:
Storm Sewer,Watermain, Sanitary Sewer and Appurtenant Work
LOCATION:
City of St.Anthony Village
WSB PROJECT NO.:
1065-85
Bids Opened: Tuesday,April 20, 2004, 10:00 a.m.
Contractor Addendums Rec'd. Bid Security Total Bid
1 Veit&Company, Inc. Yes X $399,999.00
2 Northdale Construction Inc. Yes X $470,256.82
3 Barbarossa &Sons, Inc. Yes X $518,374.42
4 Three Rivers Construction Yes X $557,472.42
Engineer's Opinion of Cost $547,947.00
I hereby certify that.this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on April 20, 2004
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E., Project Manager
Denotes corrected figure
Select link to bring up recommendation Itr to City
Select link to bring up Itr to all hi bidders
Page 1 of 1 F.1WPW1M1065-851Exce111065-85 Bid TabulationSummary
24
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-038
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A BID FOR PHASE 1: 39"AVENUE STREET
AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement as shown on the plan
for the above-referenced project,bids were received, opened and tabulated
according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the
advertisement:
Bidder Total Bid
1. Veit& Company, Inc. $399,999.00
2. Northdale Construction, Inc. $470,256.82
3. Barbarossa& Sons, Inc. $518,374.42
4. Three Rivers Construction $557,472.42
WHEREAS, it appears that Veit & Company, Inc., Rogers, MN is the lowest responsible
bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED of the City Council of the City of St. Anthony:
1. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract
with Veit & Company in the amount of$399,999 in the name of the City of St. Anthony,
Minnesota for the improvement outlined in the above-referenced project according to the
plans and specifications, therefore, approved by the City Council and on file in the office of
the City Clerk.
2. The Engineer, WSB & Associates, Inc., is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful
bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted this day of 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
F:\WPWIN\1065-85\Resolutions\04-038 awardingbidforimprovements.doc
I I I
25
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
TO: MTCAT-MT,J.MORNSON
FROM J=A."IMwM J1.4 - -
S,LIB,)CXL. T4-PNNF.PTN.C()LINTY,MMG&U(.)N.PI AN
DATE: 3/23/2004
CC:
Backbard:.
Hennepin County Emergency Preparedness received a grant from the Division of Homeland
Security and Emergency'Management to write a county-wide hazard mitigation.plan.This.plan
encompasses all cities within the county.
The purpose of the plan is to identify hazards,risks,vulnerabilities and* eaR►*es that will prevent
-loss of life.and.darnage to property while rzducing future risks in Hennepin County. The benefits of
the hazard mitigation-include,-but-are not-limited to:-saving lives-and Yeducing*uries,-preventing-or
reducing property damage,reducing economic losses,maintaining critical facilities in functioning
order,and protecting,critical infrastructure from damage.
Hazards are listed and examined for potential effects on Hennepin County. Capabilities are analyzed
and local,state,and federal resources are identified.
Acceptance of the plau does not inc=direct costs,It involves a paradigm shift from the Emergency
Purr bcia_a:rcactive-plan to-thc-Nfitigation Plan bcir►-a proactive clan.
A copy of the plan is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Action Requested:
For the St.Anthony City Council to approve acceptance of the Hennepin County Emergency
Preparedness division Mitigation Plan.
26
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 04-035
A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT BY ORDINANCE AN ALL
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony participated in the Hennepin County hazard mitigation planning
process as established under the Hazard Mitigation Act of 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Act establishes a framework for the development of a county hazard mitigation plan;
and
WHEREAS, the county, as part of the planning process with the cities, established a public
participation process and local coordination among county and neighboring local units of
government,businesses and other organizations; and
WHEREAS, the plan includes a risk assessment including past hazards, hazards that threaten the
county,maps of hazards,an estimate of structures at risk,a general description of land
uses and development trends; and
WHEREAS, the plan includes a mitigation strategy including goals and objectives and an action plan
identifying specific mitigation projects and costs; and
WHEREAS, the plan includes•a maintenance or implementation process including plan updates,
integration of plan into other planning documents and how the county will maintain city
and public participation and coordination; and
WHEREAS, the draft plan was shared with state and federal agencies for review and comment; and
WHEREAS, the county has notified the public of its intent to adopt the hazard mitigation plan,and
has made the plan available on the Hennepin County website for public comment prior to
final adoption by the City Council and County Board as required by Minnesota Statutes
375.51 and 394.26.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby
adopted by ordinance the Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation plan as part of the City of St. Anthony's
Emergency Operations Plan.
Adopted this day of 52004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
Community/Open Forum.
In an effort to provide for full and open communication with the
public and in keeping with Roberts Rules of Order, the City
Council/Planning Commission uses Open/Community Forum to
gather nformation via public input. The following procedures
apply y o Open Forum.
• The Mayor/Chair will ask if anyone is interested in
speaking at Open Forum.
0 Speakers fill out name and address at podium.
0 Citizens wishing to speak, should raise their
hands and approach the podium when recognized by
the Mayor/Chair, then clearly state full name and
address for the record. Spokespersons are given
more time for presentations, and groups are
encouraged to use them.
0 Each person will be allowed five minutes to speak.
0 . A record of comments will be kept as part of the
official minutes of the meeting.
• Speakers must direct their comments to the City
Council/Planning Commission as a whole and not to one
particular member.
• Speakers may not address topics that are already on the
agenda.
• Speakers are encouraged to comment on any aspect of
City business, but direct or inferred comments on
personality conflicts with City Council, Commission, or staff
members will not be allowed.
• City Council/Planning Commission will not take official
action on items discussed during Open Forum, except to
refer items to staff or Commission for future report.
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS March 15, 2004
Meeting Date Meeting Type Staff Items/Issues
May 11 Regular Ehlers Res., sale of GO bonds for 2004A&B
Police contracts with Lauderdale&Falcon Heights
Chair Jindra-Parks Commission report
Public hearing on condemnation of certain property
in redevelopment area
May 25 Regular Planning Commission issues of May 18th
R. Larson&S. Finance 2003 annual report/2003 audit
Bonniwell
June 8 Regular
June 22 Regular Planning Commission issues of June 15
General Fund Budget to /actual Report: March 2004
Expenditures: Mean Average
25%
03/31/2004 Percentage Remaining
Budget Y-T-D Balance Sent Budge
Mayor/Council $46,900.00 $11,682.32 $35,217.68 25% 75%
Intergovernmental Relations $21,000.00 $8,978.00 $12,022.00 43% 57%
Cable Franchise $22,200.00 $15,767.34 $6,432.66 71% 29%
General Management $80,200.00 $19,165.84 $61,034.16 24% 76%
Elections $25,400.00 $3,185.00 $22,215.00 13% 87%
Finance/Insurance $226,400.00 $45,863.80 $180,536.20 20% 80%
Finance/Assessing $42,200.00 $581.93 $41,618.07 1% 99%
Legal $85,000.00 $16,179.75 $68,820.25 19% 81%
Engineering/Planning/Zoning $2,600.00 $1,160.25 $1,439.75 45% 55%
City Buildings $122,600.00 $20,721.14 $101,878.86 17% 83%
Civil Defense $45,800.00 $13,617.35 $32,182.65 30% 70%
Police Protection $1,095,200.00 $251,498.96 $843,701.04 23% 77%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $584,800.00 $134,235.64 $450,564.36 23% 77%
Fire Protection $589,500.00 $124,154.96 $465,345.04 21% 79%
Inspections/Building Permits $76,400.00 $9,666.65 $66,733.35 13% 87%
Animal Control $4,200.00 $0.00 $4,200.00 0% 100%
Public Works $422,600.00 $82,033.15 $340,566.85 19% 81%
Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $126,100.00 $26,378.16 $99,721.84 21% 79%
Tree and Weed Care $28,200.00 $5,873.42 $22,326.58 21% 79%
Parks $129,100.00 $30,904.59 $98,195.41 24% 76%
Budget Reserves/Non Budgeted $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0% 0%
Total Expenditures $3,776,400.00 $821,648.25 $2,954,751.75 22% 78%
Stormwater Fund - Cash on Hand 0313112004
Projeted
Revenues: Funding Source Revenues-to-Date
Street Improvement Bonds $3,000,000.00 $2,948,173.80
MSA Bonds $950,000.00 $935,008.45
DNR $5,440,000.00 $5,798,197.80
FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00
Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Stone Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $509,645.42
Stone Sewer City Bonds $1.610.000.00 $1.594.271.55
Total Project Budget $12,350,000.00 $12,635,297.02
Other Project Activity:
Reserves/Transfer from Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00
State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $38,422.27
Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $5,060.75
HRA-Streetscape Transfer $0.00 $155,100.00
Met Council $20,000.00 $10,000.00
Stormwater Fees-Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00
Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $126,495.42
Sale of Pahl Avenue Homes(2700&2704) $0.00 $11,200.00
Middle Mississippi Watershed District $120,000.00 $120,000.00
29th Avenue-Water Connection Fees $26,000.00 $26,400.00
Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work 0.00 $244.647.36
Total Revenues $12,797,000.00 $13,653,622.82
03/31/2004
Expenditures: Expenditures-to-Date
WSB-Engineering Services $391,803.62
Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35
Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $39,847.99
Rice Creek Watershed District-Water Study $2,025,00
Purchase of Flood Homes $1,204,862.68
Pahl Avenue Ponding $111,308.57
Flood Relief Grant Program $65,159.32
Private Homes-Dumpsters/Service Master $17,371,44
Sump Pump $246.64
1999 Street Improvement Project $1,128,342,79
2000 Street Improvement Project $2,945,621.37
2001 Street Improvement Project $2,101,162.74
.2002 Street Improvement Project $2,488,872.83
Central Park Holding Ponds $28,961.00
SL Anthony Boulevard Street Lighting $2,174.50
Harding Street Holding Ponds $932,588.61
Silver Point Park/Construction $1.804.504.74
Total Expenditures $13,267,583.39
Project Balance $386,039.43
Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70
Total Cash on Hand $569,218.13
EXPENDITURE REPORT 03/31/2004 -
WSB: Flood Relief Grant Program: 2001 Street Improvement Project +
Project Description: Exoenditures Project Description: Expenditures Project Description:
Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 Dennis/Penny Gault $10,000.00 WSB-Engineering Services $269,395.82
Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek $10,000.00 Lillie Suburban Newspapers $38.75
Slormwater Task Force $29.243.00 Thomas/Susan Hoban $800.00 Hage Concrete Works $2,356.53
Stormwaler/General.Engineering $56,309.98 Julie Sexton $1,004.53 Olson's Plumbing $221,90
Flood Problem Analysis $31,497.23 Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE $5,280.00 Dickson Electric $453.00
MCES Grant Application $1,72425 Castle Building&Remodeling-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00 Sandness Construction $4,650.00
DNR/FEMA Grants $23,934.63 L.N.Soding-3460 Penrod Lane $600.00 Bond Issuance $21,183.48
Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 J&D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00 Park Construction $1.802.863.26
Park Design $156,447.10 St.Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00 Total 2001 Street Project $2,101,162.74
I/I Study $33,064.75 RiteWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue $390.00
Flood Grant-1998/1999/2000/2001/2002 $31,776.25 Pine Cone Nursery-3460 Penrod Lane $9,222.80 2002 Street Improvement Project
Total WSB $391,803.62 Lamere Concrete-Flood Proofing Improvement $4,412.00 Project Description:
McCaren Designs,Inc. $703.99 WSB-Engineering Services $278,472.18
Barr Engineering: Minnehaha Falls Landscaping $5,587.50 Dorsey&Whitney $5,220,89
Project Description: Elgard Excavating $1,245.00 Construction Bulletin $215.16
District#6 Watershed Study $2,709.35 Twin Cities Glass Block t1.312.50 Moody's Investors Service $3,250.00
Total Ban Engineering $2,709.35 Total Flood Relief Program $65,159.32 Springsted,Inc. $13,217.86
Asphalt&Concrete $8,087.00
Dorsey&Whitney: Private Homes-Dumpsters/Service Master Crown Fence&Wire $6,528.10
Project Description: Project Description: Frank Peterson-Misc Repair $152.01
Legal Services for Flooding Issues $17,911.16 Waste Management $391.65 TEK Services-Sod Repair $250.00
Legal Services-Condenation of Homes $17,117.75 Service Master $13,78229 Pipe Services Corp. $5,851.20
Legal Services-4029 Shamrock Drive $1,938.85 Nancy Myhran $259.50 S.M.Hentges&Sons $2.167.628.43
Legal Services-Pahl Avenue $2,880.2 3 Linda Gonier $198.00 Total 2002 Street Project $2,488,872.83
Total Dorsey&Whitney $39.847.99 Susan Kozarek $925.00
Elaine Nelson $1,065.00 St.Anthony Boulevard Lighting
Water Quality Study: Sue Wenker $250.00 Project Description:
Silver take: Berkley Risk/Insuance Claim-Payment $500.00 WSB-Engineering Services $2,174.50
Rice Creek Watershed District $2,025.00 Total Dumpsters $17,371.44 $2,174.50
Purchase of Homes: Sump Pump Harding Street Holding Ponds
Project Description: Project Description: Project Description: Expenditures
Network Title,Inc. $255.00 Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Line $131.00 WSB-Engineering Services $105,888.05
Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,926.90 Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $115.64 Bettendorf Rohrer $30,075.00
Demolition $9,156.00 Total Sump Pump/Misc. $246.64 Second Nature Lawn $278,238.80
Taxes $839.61 Residential Easements $432,183.78
Legal Services-Dorsey&Whitney $225.00 1999 Street Improvement Project Dorsey&Whitney/Legal $32,089.52
Check for Asbestos-Abatement Services $365.00 Project Description: STS Consultants $3,235.00
Seal&Cap Well $1,450.00 WSB-Engineering Services $176,525.71 Evergreen Land Services $19,519.66
Purchase of 2713 St.Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 Springsled,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85 Construction Bulliten $358.48
Demolition $11,258.00 Northdale Construction $928,231.18 Albrecht,Inc.' $20,215.22
Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Treemendous $460.00 Comdemnation Com rnissloners $8,455.10
Recording Deed/Taxes $2,506.98 Chris Addington $50322 Old Republic-Abstract Fees $2,330,00
Title Insurance $946.00 Dorsey&Whitney $2,911.55 Total Harding Street Holding Ponds $932,588.61
Seal&Cap Well $1,420.00 Bond Issuance Expense $10,875.28
Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,067.10 Total 1999 Street Project $1,128,342.79 Silver Point Park/Construction
Purchase of 27002704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45 Project Description:
Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $208,072.00 2000 Street Improvement Project Richard Knutson,Inc, $1,466,031.72
Purchase of 4029 Shamrock $265,366.24 Project Description: Sandness Construction $137,624.44
First American Title $375.00 WSB-Engineering Services $317,044.93 Thompson Homes,Inc. $9,832.50
Forsythe Appraisals/Kozarek $350.00 Barbarossa&Sons,Inc. $2,293,303.47 Muska Electric $40,730.80
Evergreen Land Services $3,369.47 Barbarossa&Sons,Inc.-Settlement of Dispute $66,067.84 Construction Bulletin $160.89
Total Purchase of Homes $1,204,882.88 E-CEL Energy $155,100.00 Lillie Suburban News/Bid Notices $84.27
Buchan Environmental Services $2,248.99 Reed Business Information/Bid Notices $305.76
Pahl Avenue Ponding: Berkley Risk Services $10,000.00 SEH,Inc.-Silver Point Park Building $39,373.88
Project Description: AIIState Insurance Company $312.76 WSB,Inc.-Silver Point Park Building $5,636.62
WSB-Engineering Services $20,967.16 St.Paul Companies $16,8x4.96 Twin City Hydro Seeding $1,298.20
G&L Construction $69,998.42 Lillie Suburan Newspaper/Construction Bulletin $232.93 Romtec $6,500.00
Treemendous $14,460.90 Albrecht,Inc. $891.75 STS Consultants $78,723.55
Pipe Services $3,859.20 Fabyanske&Westra-Legal Cost/Litigation $44,390.49 Metro Hydro Seeding $3,778.76
Crown Fence&Wire $370.00 Bond Issuance Expense $39.143.23 St.Paul Linoleum $3,250.00
Construction Bulliten $1,432.20 Total 2000 Street Project $2,945,621.37 Inter-tel Technologies $370.89
Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $220.69 Twln City Janilory Supply $214.54
Total Pahl Avenue Ponding $111,308.57 Central Park Holding Ponds W.W.Grainger,Inc. $404.82
Project Description: Trillium Park $10.183.10
Veil&Company $28.961.00 Total Silver Point Park $1,804,504.74
$28,961.00
March -2004 City of St.Anthony
Profit&Loss Statement from Operations
Actual Actual
Year to Date Year to Date Increase
SAV I** SAV II 03/31/04 03/31/03 (Decrease)
Sales $0.00 $217,183.00 $617,326.00 $474,172.00 $143,154.00
Less: Cost of Goods Sold $0.00 $170,275.00 $482,349.00 $376,613.00 $105,736.00
Gross Profit $0.00 $46,908.00 $134,977.00 $97,559.00 $37,418.00
Ratio to Net Sales 21.60% 21.86% 20.57%
Operating Expense:
Salaries,Wages, Benefits $0.00 $27,530.00 $77,350.00 $43,568.00 $33,782.00
All Other Expenses $0.00 $20,353.00 $53,263.00 $40,034.00 $13,229.00
Total Operating Expense $0.00 $47,883.00 $130,613.00 $83,602.00 $47,011.00
Ratio to Net Sales 22.05% 21.16% 17.63%
Profit from Operations $0.00 ($975.00) $4,364.00 $13,957.00 ($9,593.00)
Other Income $0.00 $3,068.00 $3,905.00 $1,141.00 $2,764.00
Net Income $0.00 $2,093.00 $8,269.00 $15,098.00 ($6,829.00)
Ratio to Net Sales 0.96% 1.34% 3.18%
March-Net Income $2,093.00
SAV I SAV 11 Y-T-D
YEAR TO DATE 03131/04 $0.00 $8,269.00 $8,269.00
YEAR TO DATE 03131/03 $0.00 $15,098.00 $15,098.00
INCREASE/DECREASE ($6,829.00) ($6,829.00)
*Stonehouse On-Sale Closed 5/30103-Unemployment Liability Still Exists
**SAV I Off-Sale Closed 8/23/03-Anticipated Opening of New Store May/June'04
March - 2004 City of St.Anthony
Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report
SAV I SAV II
Beginning Inventory: $0.00 Beginning Inventory: $322,003.11
Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus:
Transfers: SAV II $0.00 Transfers:. SAV 1 $0.00
Adjustments $0.00 Adjustments $8.30
Returns to Vendors $0.00 Returns to Vendors ($9,953.84)
Add: Receiving $0.00 Add: Receiving $128,376.92
Less: Cost of Goods Sold $0.00 Less: Cost of Goods Sold $170,282.84
TOTAL $0.00 TOTAL $270,151.65
Total per Valuation Report $0.00 Total per Valuation Report $270,292.51
Difference $0.00 Difference $140.86
Beginning April 2004 Inventory $0.00
Beginning April 2004 Inventory $270,292.51
2003 Actual Profits (Un-Audited) 2004 Y-T-D Profits
Y-T-D
SAV I SAV 11 Stonehouse SAV I SAV II Profits Comparison
January $6,588.00 $3,381.00 $2,657.00 $12,626.00 January $0.00 $2,504.00 $2,504.00 ($877.00)
February $4,782.00 $4,181.00 $8,714.00 $30,303.00 February $0.00 $3,672.00 $6,176.00 ($1,386.00)
March $10,491.00 $7,536.00 $10,935.00 $59,265.00 March $0.00 $2,093.00 $8,269.00 ($6,829.00)
April $10,095.00 $5,921.00 $10,938.00 $86,219.00 April $0.00 $0.00 $8,269.00
May $13,695.00 $10,574.00 $8,193.00 $118,681.00 May $0.00 $0.00 $8,269.00
June $12,616.00 $12,675.00 ($6,792.00) $137,180.00 June $0.00 $0.00 $8,269.00
July $11,914.00 $12,453.00 ($3,652.00) $157,895.00 July $0.00 $0.00 $8,269.00
August ($1,166.00) $18,776.00 ($12,599.00) $162,906.00 August $0.00 $0.00 $8,269.00
September ($5,297.00) $12,398.00 ($17,149.00) $152,858.00 September $0.00 $0.00 $8,269.00
October ($750.00) $5,333.00 $229.00 $157,670.00 October $0.00 $0.00 $8,269.00
November ($637.00) $299.00 ($228.00) $157,104.00 November $0.00 $0.00 $8,269.00
December 515.00 $22,820.00 ($7,428.00) $171,981.00 December $0.00 $0.00 $8,269.00
Total $61,816.00 $116,347.00 ($6,182.00) $171,981.00 Total
$0.00 $8,269.00 $8,269.00
Increase/(Decrease) ($6,829.00) ($6,829.00)
Y-T-D By Store
May 2004
Monthly Planner
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Apr 2004 Jun 2004 1
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 9:00 AM
1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 -1:00 PM
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
11 12 13.14 15 16 17 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 CLEAN UP
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAY
25 26 27 28 29 30 27 28 29 30
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
7:00 PM Parks 7:00 PM Council
Commission Meeting
Meeting -
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
7:00 PM
Planning -
Commission
Meeting
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
7:00 PM Council
Meeting
30 31
Memorial Day
Off
Printed by Calendar Creator for Windows on 4/14/2004
June 2®®4
Monthly Planner
. �
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
7:00 PM Parks 7:00 PM Council
Commission Meeting
meeting
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
7:00 PM
Planning
Commission
meeting
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
7:00 PM Council
meeting
27 28 29 30 May 2004 Jul 2004
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 1 2 3
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
30 31
Printed by Calendar Creator for Windows on 4/14/2004
2003 ANNUAL
REPORT
ST ANTHONY POLICE
DEPARTMENT
I �Ir
2003 ANNUAL
REPORT
Introduction
General Department Information
Strength
Budget
Fleet
Crime Statistics
Part I and Part II Crimes
Part I and II Crimes over last 5 years
Average Part I and II Clearances
Calls for Service
Patrol Statistics
Investigations
Significant Cases
Crime Prevention
DARE
Police Officer Training and Education
Training Hours
Police Reserve Program
Community Service Officer Review
2003 Accomplishments
2004 Work Plan
Introduction
Honorable Mayor, Council, City Manager, and St. Anthony residents:
I am pleased to present to you the Police Department's 2003 Annual Report.
2003 saw economic changes that have challenged local government to
provide the same level of service at a lower cost. The police department
continues to do more for less and provide for new and innovating ways to
deliver service to the community. Improving the over all quality of life for
our citizens is one of our goals and a priority in the police department and
we will continue to work towards these ends.
Respectfully,
Richard Engstrom
Chief of Police
ST ANTHONY POLICE DEPARTMENT
2003 ANNUAL POLICE REPORT
The following pages consist of annual statistics, activities, crime reports, investigations,
use of resources, and other initiatives during the year starting January 1, 2003 and ending
December 31, 2003.
Department Authorized Strength
Authorized Actual
Sworn Officers 14 14
Reserve Officers 14 10
Community Service Officers 2 1
Civilian Employees 2 2
Totals 32 30
St. Anthony Police Department Budget
Total for the year 2003 $1,159,200.00 (includes contract cities)
St. Anthony Police Fleet
5 —Marked Squads
1 —Marked Reserve Unit
1 —Marked Supervisor Unit
1 —CSO Truck
1 — Investigators Unit Unmarked
1 —Detective Captain Vehicle Unmarked
1 — Chief Vehicle Unmarked
Total 11 Units
2
Part 1 and Part 11 Crimes
PART I Murder Rape Robbery Agg Burglary Larceny MV'
2003 0 1 2 1 29 274 22 1
2002 0 6 1 2 4 48 1 228 1 17 0
+/- 1 0 -5 0 -3 -19 +46 +5 +1
ART 11 Other Assaul
2003 13 92 1 32
2002 16 64 14 34
+/- -3 +28 -13 -2
Part 1 and 11 Crimes over the past five years
1999 Part I 312 Total 807 Overall Clearances 53%
Part II 495
2000 Part 1 278 Total 588 Overall Clearances 58%
Part 11 310
2001 Part 1 267 Total 552 Overall Clearances 56%
Part ll 285
2002 Part 1 305 Total 614 Overall Clearances 64%
Part U 309
2003 Part 1 330 Total 643 Overall Clearances 55%
Part Il 313
Average Part I and Part II clearance rates for Hennepin County in 2000 were 40%
Average Part I and Part II clearance rates for Ramsey County in 2000 were 33%
Part I Crimes increased by 8% in 2003
Part II Crimes increased by 1% in 2003
The increase in Part I offenses is due to a large increase in motor vehicle thefts and
larcenies.
3
may. 410 , =x
ST. ANTHONY PART I CRIMES
300
250
200
150
❑Murder
100 ®Rape
8 ❑ Robbery
50 9 ❑Agg As It
■Burglary
0
2003 2002 ❑Larceny
❑Murder 0 0 ■MV Theft
®Rape 1 6 ❑Arson
❑Robbery 2 2
❑Agg As It 1 4
■Burglary 29 48
❑Larceny 274 228
®MV Th eft 22 17
❑ 1 0
St. Anthony 2003 Part I Crimes
Homicide Rape Robbery AQg Assault Buralary Theft Vehicle Theft Arson PART I TOTAL
JAN 0 0 0 0 0 21 7 0 28
FEB 0 0 0 0 1 18 2 0 21
MAR 0 0 0 0 0 23 2 0 25
APR 0 0 01 0 1 36 2 0 39
MAY 0 0 01 0 1 16 3 1 21
JUN 0 0 11 0 2 36 1 0 40
JUL 0 0 01 0 5 17 0 0 22
AUG 0 0 1 1 8 25 3 0 38
SEP 0 0 0 0 1 26 1 0 28
OCT 0 0 0 0 2 12 1 0 15
NOV 0 1 0 0 5 19 0 0 25
DEC 0 0 0 0 3 25 0 0 28
EAR TO DATO 01 11 21 11 29 274 22 1 1 330
ST. ANTHONY PART II CRIMES
92
100
90
80
70
60
50 ❑Assaults
❑Vandalism
40
■Terr Threats
30 16 ■Fraud/Forgery
13
20
10
0
2003 2002
❑Assaults 13 16
❑Vandalism 92 64
■Terr Threats 1 14
®Fraud/Forgery 32 34
St Anthony2003.Part H Crimes
Aaeault
ESMIN Fraud Embezzlement Stolen PMLeM Vandallsm Wea o s rostRutlon Other Sex Dru Abuse Gamblln A-alnet Famll DWI LI uor Laws DOC Ve ran Ot er Offenses a a
_
JAN 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 2 0 8 32
FEB 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 a 1 1 0 4 '18
MAR 1 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 '0 1 5 1 0 0 6 23
APR 2 1 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 23
MAY 3 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 1 a 1 1 0 4 22
JUN 0 41 1 01 0 9 1 0 01 3 01 0 2 0 2 0 7 29
JUL 1 2 1 1 1 11 0 00 1 0 0 0 5 1 0 7 31
AUG 1 2 1 0 0 12 1 0 0 1 01 0 4 2 2 0 3 29
SEP 2 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 01 5 5 1 0 13 33
OCT 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 . 0 0 0 01 0 a 1 1 0 11 28
NOV 0 4 4 0 1 1 0 0 t 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 5 A313
DEC 0 2 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 4
YEAR TO DATE 13 18 1a 1 4 92 3 0 1 17 0 3 42 1s tt t 7a
Other calls/incidents of interest in 2003
Domestics 47 Underage Drinking Arrest 21
Disturbance Calls 123 Disorderly Conduct 11
Suspicious Person/Vehicle 317 Assist Other Agencies 113
Narcotics Arrests 17 Medical 435
False Alarms 163 Juvenile Runaway 12
Alarms—No Report 116 Juvenile Tobacco Use 18
Sale of Tobacco to Juvenile 1 Juvenile Curfew Violations 1
Registered Sex Offenders 11 Bike Patrol Duties
*Internal Affairs 0
2002 5329 1069 1524
2003 5331 786 1497
2002 6261 1783 2341
2003 5696 1279 2026
*Internal affairs investigations:
• One case discontinued
• One case not sustained
• Two cases exonerated
8
ST ANTHONY ANNUAL PATROL STATISTICS
Prepared by Lt. Cotroneo
The most important responsibility of the Patrol Unit in a police department
is to be as visible as possible. It's this wide visibility, which makes the
police department accessible to the residents it serves, and acts as a deterrent
to criminal activity.
The patrol officers on the St. Anthony Police Department continued their
consistently high level of activity in the year 2003. The Patrol staff issued
2373 citations in the City. Of the citations issued, 1772 were for moving
violations (with 566 of those for speeding violations). They also arrested
700 individuals during the course of their patrol duties throughout the year.
The patrol staff continues to recognize and follow the Department's
Community Orientated Policing Strategy, which is to:
-Arrest offenders
-Prevent crime
-Solve on-going problems
-Improve the overall quality of life
Their high visibility and activity, together with teamwork, allows the Police
Department to provide the residents of St. Anthony, with the level of service
they've come to expect.
9
2003 INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY TOTALS
• Total Criminal Cases 1097
• Total Cases Cleared 574
• Total Cases Cleared by Arrest 473
• Total Cases Cleared by Other 101
BREAKDOWN BY CITY
ST. ANTHONY
• Total Criminal Cases 676
• Total Cases Cleared 367
• Total Cases Cleared by Arrest 295
• Total Cases Cleared by Other 72
LAUDERDALE
• Total Criminal Cases 164
• Total Cases Cleared 79
• Total Cases Cleared by Arrest 67
• Total Cases Cleared by Other 12
FALCON HEIGHTS
• Total Criminal Cases 257
• Total Cases Cleared 128
• Total Cases Cleared by Arrested 111
• Total Cases Cleared by Other 17
NOTE: - These statistics DO NOT include traffic arrests, warrant arrests, ICR only
offenses, and mysterious disappearances.
10
SIGNIFICANT CASES
Prepared by Captain Ohl
The police department works a large variety of criminal cases.
Commonplace arrests for narcotics violations, theft, assault, and damage to
property are part of our everyday caseload. However, to give the citizens an
idea of some of the more significant cases worked this year, we would
submit the following (this list is by no means exhaustive of the police
department's yearly case load):
• Child Porn (03-15) — Investigated case. Searched computer. Turned
over to other jurisdiction for continued investigation.
• Level III Sex Offender — Offender moved into Roseville just outside
of St. Anthony. Information mailed to 100+ residents of St. Anthony.
• Criminal Sexual Conduct (03-560) — 77-year-old male had non-
consensual contact with adult mentally challenged female. Suspect
charged.
• Burglary of Business (03=2137/2134) — Business burglarized several
times. Arrested 4 adult males and recovered stolen motorcycles.
• Felony Narcotics/Reckless Discharge of a Firearm/Child
Endangerment (03-3403) — Weapon (shotgun) discharged in home.
Responding officers located a felony amount of controlled substance.
1 juvenile male and 1 adult female charged.
• Felony Criminal Damage to Property/Felony Theft (03-3502) — 3
adult males arrested (by squad) who broke into multiple vehicles.
Also cleared cases for Roseville and Minneapolis police departments.
• Felony Narcotics (034087) — Suspect arrested by squads. Search
warrant executed. Suspect charged.
• Possession of Explosives (03-3687) — One juvenile male charged.
11
• Criminal Sexual Conduct (03-5291) — Suspect and victim currently
enlisted in Army. Assisted Army investigator with case occurring in
St. Anthony. Army to charge suspect. -
• Criminal Sexual Conduct (03-8015) — Adult female victim. Suspect
identified and arrested.
• Burglary of Business (03-8677) — Entry made into vacant part of
Apache Plaza. Messages written in blood on walls. Blood tested and
found to be non-human.
• Felony Theft (03-3336) - $20,000 worth of jewelry stolen. Suspect
identified. Search warrant executed. No property recovered.
• Death Investigation (02-84) Death occurring in 2002 now being
reported as a murder. Extensive investigation ensued. Met with ME
and Hennepin County Attorney. Exhumation of body would not
produce evidence necessary for criminal charge.
12
2003 St. Anthony Crime Prevention Summary
Prepared by Officer Mosby
Every member of our police department is involved with crime prevention.
Our community oriented policing strategy allows for every officer to get
involved with individual residents and businesses, addressing their concerns.
There are two specially trained Crime Prevention Officers (Moore and
Mosby) that are assigned specifically to St. Anthony. Their added
responsibilities include setting up new block clubs and performing security
surveys for homes and businesses. In addition, I (Mosby) write the quarterly
crime prevention section that is published in the city newsletter.
The police department's bike patrol was active this past summer. There are
five officers that are trained as "Police Cyclists". Officers generally ride for
at least four hours in the early evening, concentrating their attention on parks
and heavy-traffic retail areas.
The D.A.R.E. program serves as a form of crime prevention as well.
Positive relationships are created between the D.A.R.E. officer and students,
parents and school staff. These groups generally feel more comfortable
approaching police officers to discuss their concerns.
The following is a list of crime prevention related events that occurred
during 2003:
03-03-03: Gave presentation to a Cub Scout Pack at St. Charles Borromeo
03-05-03: Attended neighborhood meeting on St Anthony Blvd reference speed limits
03-15-03: Gave tour of police department to church group
04-17-03: Gave seminar on Criminal Justice System to students at SAHS
04-30-03: Attended Block Party(2517 St Anthony Blvd)
05-13-03: Gave tour of police department to Cub Scout Pack and gave safety seminar
05-30-03: Gave seminar on bank robbery at US Bank
06-06-03: Attended all-night party for SAHS seniors
08-05-03: National Night Out (Approximately 23 block parties attended)
09-27-03: Attended Cub Foods' 350'Anniversary Party—Handed out crime prevention
items and toys for the kids.
10-10-03: Attended SAMS Activity night
10-24-03: Attended Community Services Halloween Party and handed out candy
11-26-03: Gave police department tours to large groups of children from Child Care
13
DARE REVIEW FOR 2003/2004
Prepared by Officer Mosby
This year, a"new and improved" D.A.R.E. curriculum was introduced. Up
until this year, I taught the old 17-week curriculum, followed by a
substantial culmination event. The new curriculum was a condensed and re-
written form consisting of only nine weeks of in-class instruction followed
by an optional culmination. Before the year started, I approached the .
teachers and administration of both Wilshire Park Elementary and St Charles
Borromeo School. The new program was discussed and I gave them several
options to consider for culmination, if any.
I believe that the new curriculum is a definite improvement as to content, but
I don't get to know the students nearly as well as in the past. The
workbooks are much more colorful and it appeared as though the students
contributed more often. I taught approximately 108 5th grade students at
Wilshire and about 44 at St Charles Borromeo.
Wilshire Park teachers and administrators decided to have a pizza party
during the school day as their culmination event in lieu of the nighttime
extravaganza. Domino's Pizza donated half of the pizzas needed and gave
us a substantial discount on the remainder. Fuel Mart (3813 Stinson
Boulevard) supplied the soda pop at a discount as well.
St. Charles Borromeo decided to continue with the evening culmination
event with a guest speaker. The speaker was Minnesota Associate Supreme
Court Justice James Gilbert. D.A.R.E. is close to his heart as he is on the
board of directors of Minnesota DARE.
In addition to D.A.R.E. instruction, I visited several classrooms at the
request of individual teachers. At St. Charles Borromeo, I gave
presentations to the 1't grade classes and talked about police work, personal
safety, and answered their questions. I was a"celebrity" reader for the 3d
grade students at Wilshire Park as well.
Due to the condensed D.A.R.E. season, I had the opportunity to spend two
days a week for ten weeks up at St. Anthony High School/Middle School.
My duties at these schools included general security, handling criminal
violations/investigations, and classroom visits. I was interviewed by a
couple of students who were interested in a career in Law Enforcement. I
14
formed several close working relationships with staff and students alike.
The time spent at the schools was rewarding and the school appreciated my
efforts as evidenced by correspondence received from school officials
15
REVIEW OF MIDDLE SCHOOL D.A.R.E PROGRAM
Prepared by Lt. Cotroneo
The Drug Abuse Resistance Education program (DARE) turned 20 years old
in 2003. The DARE program was cooperatively developed in 1983 by the
Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles Unified School
District. The emphasis of the middle school curriculum is to provide or
reinforce the information and skills to enable students to resist pressure and
other influences in making their personal choices.
In St. Anthony, the DARE Program has continued to be a component of our
Community Orientated Policing. In addition to the elementary curriculum,
taught by Officer Mosby, I've taught the middle school curriculum to 8"
graders in our district. I've taught the 8t' graders at both the St. Anthony
Middle School and St. Charles Borromeo School. Having an officer make
the follow up contact with the students in their middle school years has kept
the lines of communication open with them, parents and school staff.
I met with 2 classes of 8`h graders at St. Anthony Middle School in
March/April of 2003. This completed the 2002-2003 school year. In
October 2003 I was asked to assist and attended an "Activity Night" for
students at the St. Anthony Middle School. In October/November of 2003 I
met with 3 classes of 8t' graders at St. Anthony Middle School. In
November/December I met with 2 classes (combined into one) of 8th graders
at St. Charles Borromeo School. These two groups marked the beginning of
the 2003-2004 school year. All of the students who successfully completed
the work in the program were treated to a pizza party during one of their
lunch hours.
The DARE Program is the nation's largest and best-known substance abuse
prevention program. It's been the beneficiary of an entirely new, state-of-
the-art substance abuse prevention curriculum, thanks to a $13 million grant
awarded by "The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation." The grant recipient,
The University of Akron, developed this new curriculum based on the latest
prevention research. The new elementary curriculum was presented this
year, and the new Middle School curriculum is slated to be presented in the
2004-2005 school year.
16
The Police Department looks to continue its partnership with the schools, for
the continuation of the DARE Program.
17
2003 POLICE OFFICER EDUCATION SUMMARY
Prepared by Lt. Scholl
The year 2003 challenged St. Anthony Police Department's need for a
balanced education program, faced with budget restraints and the loss of
comp time, forced us to carefully examine need verses cost. Officers kept
their composure when certain schools were put on hold. Officers had to
adjust knowing schools will be attended with little to no overtime used.
Many came off their night shift tour and attended training during the day at
straight hourly wage.
SAPD made the best of a financially restricted year. We focused on
attaining grant-funded education offered through county, state, and federal
levels.
We met the goals of the MN Police Officer Standards and Training (POST)
education. All schools increased in costs. All officers met state guidelines in
the following areas:
• Use of Force (liability, hands on, MN statutes, federal case law,
handcuffing, use continuum, verbal skills, ASP, Aerosols, practicals)
• OSHA, through Anoka County Community College
• Pursuit Driving, through St. Cloud State University (classroom, PIT,
and emergency techniques)
• Firearms Training (handgun, shotgun, less lethal, MP-5, 2 SIMS
shoots)
• Emergency Medical Services, through Hennepin County Medical
Center (I" Responder and EMT)
In order to save on costs, we used our well-trained certified instructors to
cover needs in Use of Force and firearms. We conducted OSHA training at
our City Hall and kept costs down by changing certification through Anoka
County Community College. Even though pursuit driving and EMS training
expenses had increased, our researched showed that we receive better
training for a reduced cost then other POST certified options.
SAPD had a good year of training. SAPD was able to conduct 2 SIMS
shoots. Sergeant Diegnau received his management certificate through the
18
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Officer Wychor became a Sig Armorer.
We received and got personal protection equipment and twining. SAPD
also had joint county training in weapons of mass destruction and helped
form a critical response. All POST requirements were met. All officers met
their required POST hours.
Budget restraints will continue in 2004. We will meet our goals and continue
to seek well-balanced educational programs that will maintain our
professional edge.
Our firearms instructors had worked out plans with St. Anthony High School
to conduct an active shooter SIMS shoot for all officers. We are also
looking at the new Ramsey County LEC for low cost POST firearms
training. Law updates and case law training is also being scheduled. We
have eight officers in need of pursuit driving training and are seeking pursuit
intervention technique certification. Officer Sroga seeks his Use Of Force
Instructor Certification. Ground fighting will be an emphasis.
Total Hours POST Credited
2003 Totals* 1055 657
2002 Totals 1414 1149
2001 Totals 1307 1021
2000 Totals 1676 1360
1999 Totals* 1321 900
1998 Totals* 971 710
1997 Totals* 914 694
*Chief totals involved
19
2003 POLICE RESERVE SUMMARY
Prepared by Lt. Scholl
The St. Anthony Police Reserves volunteered 2,272 hours for 2003. These
hours do not include police reserve administration time spent on meetings
and planning. We lost reserves in 2003. Two began their law enforcement
careers. Three left due to life changes. All left in good standing with
SAPD. One person, Jeff Johnson,joined our unit. The St. Anthony Police
Department obtained Mr. Johnson from the Minneapolis Police Department.
All reserves are well trained; including Mr. Johnson. The St. Anthony
Police Department reserve strength currently stands at 10 members with no
one on leave.
Hours attributed to reserve patrol totaled 1286. This time was spent with
patrolling cities, vehicle lockouts, vehicle impounds; minor assists, medicals,
transports, animal complaints, parking enforcement, and other tasks that they
were directed to assist with by sworn officers.
Hours attributed to special events totaled 608. Our police reserves assisted
with school carnivals, St. Charles Mardi-Gras, Villagefest, local parades,
National Night Out, school dances, sporting events, State Fair, and other
events. Event hours nearly doubled 2002 hours and this was done with
fewer officers.
Reserve Sergeant Gary Myrick, once again, led in hours served.
Due to restraints, training was down a bit for 2003. Reserves received
training from the Hennepin County Sheriff's Department. Many reserves
received search and rescue training. We met our EMS training goals
covering both 1't Responder and EMT. All reserves received basic 800 MHz
schooling.
Police reserves assisted SAPD as role players during our in-house Use of
Force and SIMS shoots. Several reserves also testified in court due to
situations, which occurred while on duty.
20
For the first time, our reserve make-up consists of a majority of people who
do not intend to enter the field of law enforcement. Although our total hours
are down, total numbers of individual volunteer hours are on the increase.
Our reserves have formed a cohesive unit and really take pride in being a
professional, well trained, all volunteer program.
Structural changes implemented fully in 2003 helped in obtaining event
coverage. The patrol schedules were completed fii Cher in advance.
Adjustments needed for shift fill were easier to complete.
Goals for 2004 include Jeffrey Johnson's reserve graduation and completion
of field training, assist with active shooter training as role players, update
business key holder information, continue high hours, complete Use of
Force training, conduct in house training, locate 1-3 qualified candidates,
and maintain our positive image in the community we serve.
21
2003 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER REVIEW
Prepared by Sergeant Diegnau
The Community Service Officer Unit, again for 2003, has been a very
resourceful unit. It has been positive and shown to be a great asset to the St.
Anthony Police Department. This unit is designed to allow non-
sworn/civilian officers to respond to non-emergency/community service type
calls. This activity allows sworn officers to remain available for more
serious calls and continue general patrol duties.
This unit consists of one part-time/non-swonVcivilian employee. This
officer works a total of 20 hours per week.
In 2003 the Community Service Officer Unit documented 493 incidents. A
brief description of some of these incidents, which assists our patrol staff,
are as follows:
• Vehicle/Residential Lockouts
• Traffic Control Incidents
• Animal/Wildlife Complaints
• Vehicle Parking Complaints
• General Transports
• Squad Maintenance
• Squad Equipment Inventory
Along with these types of incidents, the Community Service Officer Unit
also assists the front office personnel with data entry, general assistance for
citizen's at the front window, drop off and pick up packages, serve summons
and subpoenas, miscellaneous errands, and pick up needed equipment.
Again, this is just a brief summary and description of the area of
responsibilities that are completed by this unit.
Our goals for the year 2004 are to continue utilizing the unit as we have
done so in the past. We would also like to bring this Community Service
Officer Unit back to full strength by hiring a second part-time officer to join
the unit.
22
In conclusion, our CSO continues to be a great asset to our department. Our
CSO performs many details and errands that would otherwise have to be
completed by a sworn officer or office staff personnel.
23
2003 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
We continue to meet such routine successes as state and federal training
mandates, coding standards, maintaining POST mandated rules and
regulations, and the operation of an effective and professional agency. In
addition to these routine successes, we also note the following for 2003:
• Officer turnover still low. Again,we lost no officers this year. This keeps
trained/experienced officers in St. Anthony.
• Maintained representation in a grass roots community organization
called the Family Services Collaborative.
• Continued work with Hennepin and Ramsey Counties regarding
WMD's/terrorism and emergency operations.
• Completed all POST mandated Use of Force training utilizing our own
instructors.
• Met all State and Federal training mandates.
• Set up link with State Department of Motor Vehicles allowing us to
download state driver's license information including driver's license
photos.
• Set up technology to submit criminal cases to Hennepin County entirely
electronically.
• Received positive air purifying respirators thru grant funds and
implemented training.
• Trained all officers in WMD/terrorism response.
• Received grant funds and implemented an underage alcohol enforcement
program.
• Received grant to conduct alcohol compliance checks.
• Received digital camera from a Best Buy grant.
• Completed a 4-wave saturation patrol for DWI offenders thru a state
"Nitecap" grant.
• Participated in a major WMD critical incident exercise involving multiple
local,-county,state, and federal agencies. The exercise simulated 100
dead and 400 wounded.
• Safely and effectively worked with our new 800 Megahertz system.
• Worked with Public Works on infrastructure security,water supply in
particular.
• Received MARK I Kits and trained all officers in their use.
• Met all minimum training requirements while limiting the use of
overtime.
24
2004 Work Plan
As we find ourselves generating the 2003 Annual Report, we are amidst a
state financial crisis. Unsure budgets and cuts in local government aid will
make for a challenging year. Even as our 2004 budget is in place, we are
looking at trimming it, and making significant reductions.
In many ways, our goal for 2004 could be summed up in one sentence...
"Continue to provide professional quality police service in an unsure
economic environment." This being true, we would respectfully list the
following as realistic goals for 2004:
• Continue planning for response to a terrorist/WMD event and working
with both Hennepin and Ramsey County Emergency Management.
• Conduct immediate action drills at St. Anthony High School.
• Involve our emergency response unit with a cutting edge Hennepin
County Unit specifically trained to work in level A equipment.
• Obtain additional equipment for the department through private
grants.
• Create a working relationship with Ramsey Counties Firearms
Program to augment our current training.
• Create a computer generated uniform report and eliminate hand
written documents.
• Participate with the State's Nite Cap Program. The grant program
pays for additional DWI enforcement.
• Receive grant funds for 100% purchase of officer's protective vests.
• Work with SAFD to update our City's Emergency Operations Plan.
• Receive training on WMD with public works involvement.
25
e Attempt to increase the amount of PPE ensembles for I"Responders.
• Continue to work with, and be apart of the Family Services
Collaborative, which is a volunteer organization that works on
creating positive opportunities for area youth.
• Maintain a positive atmosphere and keep officer morale high.
• Maintain department personnel strength to accomplish our mission
and meet the needs of our citizens.
26
t
i
I
,y
Hennepin
lz
I
S`.
I
I
f
i.
i I
I !.
i
I �
•* -e- ��'�µ �� -� � .��7 ,��• Amy 11�� I-
� .Fk�
� t
8 - i
i
r
I
1
w
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan TOC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
II. PLANNING PROCESS
III. COMMUNITY PROFILE
A. Basic County Infformation
B. History
C. Geography
D. Hydrology
E. Geology
F. Climate
G. Population Growth and Demographics
H. Occupational Breakdown c
I. Income Distribution
7. Industry
K. Land and Development
L. Housing and Community Development
M. Environment
N. Transportation and Commuting Patterns
O. Special Planning Considerations
IV. HAZARD MITIGATION OVERVIEW
A. Definition
1
TT\T.hlP of(`nnt—*.A-
" Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan TOC
B. Goal
C. Benefits
D. Process
V. HAZARD RISK/VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
A. Overview of Risk Assessment
B. Synopsis of Risk Assessment
C. Sector 1 — Minneapolis
1. Risks
2. Vulnerabilities
3. Mitigation Opportunities
4. Current/Completed Projects
D. Sector 2 — South
1. Risks
2. Vulnerabilities
3. Mitigation Opportunities
4. Current/Completed Projects
E. Sector 3 — Lake Minnetonka
1. Risks
2. Vulnerabilities
3. Mitigation Opportunities
4. Current/Completed Projects
F. Sector 4 — North Suburban
2
Tl•\Tw}lo of('nntanta lnr
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan TOC
1. Risks
2. Vulnerabilities
3. Mitigation Opportunities
4. Current/Completed Projects
G. Sector 5 — North
1. Risks
2. Vulnerabilities
3. Mitigation Opportunities
4. Current/Completed Projects
VI. HAZARDS
A. Blizzard
B. Dams & levees
C. Domestic Preparedness
D. Drought
E. Earthquake
F. Extreme Temperatures
G. Fire
H. Flood
I. Hazardous Materials
J. Ice and Sleet
K. Infectious Disease
3
n•\Twhln of(`r..,tPnta Anr.
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan TOC
L. Karst Topography
M. Radiological
N. Solar Storm
O. Thunderstorms
P. Tornadoes
Q. Water Supply Contamination
VII. Goals, Objectives, Strategies
VIII. Priorities
APPENDIX A — MAPS
4
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Executive Summary
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Mission: To identify measures that will prevent loss of life and damage to
properly while reducing future risks in Hennepin County
Hennepin County Emergency Preparedness received a grant from the
Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management to write a
county-wide hazard mitigation plan: This plan will cover all cities within
the county.
The purpose of the plan is to identify hazards, risks, vulnerabilities, and
measures that will prevent loss of life and damage to property while
reducing future risks in Hennepin County. The benefits of hazard
mitigation include, but are not limited to: saving lives and reducing
injuries, preventing or reducing property damage, reducing economic
losses, maintaining critical facilities in functioning order, and protecting
infrastructure from damage.
Hazards are listed and examined for potential effects on Hennepin County.
Capabilities are analyzed and local, state, and federal resources are
identified.
Acceptance of the plan does not incur direct costs. It involves, rather, a
paradigm shift. A relatively small amount of money spent before a
disaster can greatly reduce the damage and expense after it happens.
1
n4l FVGrlrtivP Rnmmnry Anr
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Process
11. Planning Process
A. Mission Statement
To identify measures that will prevent loss of life and damage to
property while reducing future risks in Hennepin County
S. Steering Committee
Hennepin County has developed a countywide local mitigation plan.
The Emergency Preparedness Division (EPD) was responsible for
coordinating and drafting the plan. EPD called together a steering
committee comprised of representatives from each of the five local
planning groups in the county. In addition, state government and
private industry were represented as well as the Metropolitan Airports
Commission (MAC). This group wrote a mission statement and guided
the planning process. Drafts were periodically submitted to the group
for comment and correction. Because of the ease of email
communication and the difficulties of travel during the summer road
construction season, the group met once a month and communicated
electronically more frequently. See Attachment 1 for a list of invited
participants. Some attended meetings and others provided electronic
advice. See Attachment 5 for the proposed project timeline.
C. Public Participation
Five public meetings (one in each planning group) were held in late
May and June 2003, during the drafting stage (see attachment 2).
Public participation was dismal even though a press release was issued
through Public Affairs and the release appeared in the Minneapolis
Star-Tribune, the largest newspaper in the area. The EPD director also
did an extensive radio interview on mitigation at the same time.
However, the emergency management professionals who.attended
had creative conversations about the hazards they face and
brainstormed imaginative solutions. The time was not wasted; the
informal setting allowed many ideas to be brought forth for inclusion in
the plan. Lack of public participation could be because of the lack of a
focusing event. The last Presidential disaster declaration was in 1998,
and the window of opportunity is long past.
Attachment 7 shows the presentation prepared for the public
meetings.
1
nATT Plan ;—Pmrpaa A-
Hennepin County Hazard mitigation Plan Planning Process
Meeting Notes
June 4, 2003 Maple Grove North Planning Group
Major hazards are I94/694/494, a major pipeline, and the schools.
Schools are vulnerable facilities with a volatile population. A lot of new
construction is slab-on-grade townhouses; building codes do not
mandate safe rooms. These developments must consider storm
shelters. The planning area has 92 - 302 facilities. Some industries in
the area have defense contracts that deal with unusual materials. The
medical technology businesses can be politically sensitive. Because
the area is developing so quickly, the likelihood of tornado damage has
increased. 'A tornado 25 years ago would have moved through farm
fields; today it would move through shopping centers and dense
housing. The north area has little flooding. There are some
landlocked lakes that rise in wet years but have not threatened major
structures.
Meeting Notes
June 5, 2003 St. Louis Park South Planning Group
There are 111 — 302 facilities in the south planning group area.
Although the discussion named tornados as causing the most concern,
utility problems were identified as top in the hazard ranking of the
planning group. However, a tornado could cause a cascade effect
where power outages and other utility problems could occur. The
sector has a number of low areas where heavy rains cause urban
flooding. The City of St. Louis Park has an ongoing flood mitigation
project to solve the problem. Because of construction in the south
sector, pipeline breaks are a concern. This area has the Mall of
America and the Minneapolis/St. Paul International airport. The Mall of
America is a venue that represents American capitalism and could be a
target for terrorists. The airport handles international flights that could
carry undesired persons.
Meeting Notes
June 11, 2003 Rogers Northwest Planning Group
p
There are 5 — 302 facilities in the northwest planning group area.
Some are located adjacent to vulnerable facilities. For example, a co-
op in Dayton has large anhydrous ammonia tanks across the road from
a mobile home park. The tanks are a hazard not only because of their
2
TT\TT Pl-;-P-.rl-
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Process
location, but also because people from further into the urban core
come out to steal ammonia to use in meth labs. This causes leaks at
the site. The population is growing. The City of Rogers cannot
capture the benefits of this increase because they are locked into a
levy amount, not rate. The need for infrastructure may be an
opportunity to look at the future and build increased capacity.
Meeting Notes
June 18, 2003 Minneapolis
There are 123 — 302 facilities in the Minneapolis planning area. The
facilities that do not report are a concern because no one knows about
them. Major hazards are freeways, the train yard in NE Minneapolis,
and the new light rail transit. There are many large venues in the city
that could be a target of terrorist attack. Buildings in the city are
aging and are more susceptible to collapse than newer structures built
to stronger code. Tunnels under the streets of downtown Minneapolis
should be inventoried. No one knows exactly what runs in the tunnels,
and waiting until a collapse or a flood is not a wise option.
Meeting Notes
June 26, 2003 Wayzata
The Lake Minnetonka planning area has 31302 facilities.. The area is
primarily residential with some hobby farms. Natural disasters are
feared most by the emergency managers, followed by hazardous
materials spills and gas line breaks. Ice storms have a history of
causing power outages; underground utilities and/or strategically
placed generators are an option. Lake Minnetonka presents challenges
on summer weekends because of the huge increase in boat traffic on
the lake.
A sixth public meeting was held in August 2003 when a first draft was
almost complete. See Attachment 6 for meeting information. This
time, the steering committee invited specific representatives to attend.
People from the banking industry, elected officials, public works,
business continuity planners, and a neighboring county came to talk.
It was a brainstorming session where non-emergency managers were
asked their input on hazards and what to do about them. A recurring
theme was that of personal responsibility and how to communicate the
concept to the public. Approximately 36 people were invited.
3
T)ATT Pla in Prrv. A-
i
Hennepin-County Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Process
Attendees also completed a questionnaire that rated their opinions on
mitigation concerns and strategies. The same questionnaire was made
available to self-selected respondents in the Public Works Facility in
Medina (see Attachment 4).
In January 2004 the Mitigation Plan will be available for final comment
on our website. Public Affairs will distribute a press release indicating
that final comments are requested. The plan is also being distributed
to every jurisdiction in the County for final examination and adoption.
®. Hazard Identification
Each city was given a survey adapted from the FEMA hazard
identification survey (See Attachment 3). It ranked a defined list of
hazards according to probability, magnitude, warning time, and how
severely the hazard would affect continuity of operations.
Respondents also had space to comment on special planning
considerations in the community. These have been incorporated into
the mitigation plan. The State Mitigation Plan was used as a reference
tool.
E. Implementation Strategy
Feedback from the public meetings, steering committee, and
questionnaires will be used to establish mitigation priorities (See
Attachment 4). Implementation of those projects will depend on
mitigation funds available from the Minnesota Department of Public
Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency_Management.
Other funding sources would be investigated and possible partnerships
established with the private sector. When the Hennepin County
Emergency Preparedness Division becomes aware of the availability of
mitigation funds, the mitigation steering committee will be convened to
reexamine and confirm priorities for projects based on cost benefit
analysis at the time. Jurisdictions covered by this plan will consult this
plan for possible mitigation opportunities when considering major
building/infrastructure projects, and when contemplating changes to
water plans, zoning ordinances, and building codes.
A recommendation for the future is to compare mitigation plans with
neighboring counties to see where economies can be enhanced and
overlaps eliminated. . Other plans such as the Metropolitan Council
2030 Draft Regional Development Framework have been examined for
areas of mutual concerrr; however the Met Council was not directly
involved in the Hennepin County mitigation planning process.
4
T)ATT PlanniPmnnae jinn
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Process
F. Formal Adoption
The County Board and the City Councils will adopt the Hennepin
County Hazard Mitigation plan after the Division of Homeland Security
and Emergency Management have approved a final draft. Hassan
Township will also have the option of adopting the plan; they are
currently covered by the county all hazards plan. This will be
completed by the end of March 2004. Public comment will be invited
during this period, at each city council meeting. Documentation from
each jurisdiction indicating acceptance will be kept on file at HCEP and
submitted to the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency
Management.
G. Plan Maintenance
The Emergency Preparedness Division will review the plan annually.
EPD will do this in the context of changing zoning laws, evolving
policies, and other factors that could cause reprioritization of mitigation
issues. Changes will be relayed electronically to the steering
committee for approval. The steering committee will be convened if
there are major changes, or if a county-wide perspective is needed.
Public comment will be solicited using notices from the Public Affairs
Department.
The plan will be reviewed and submitted to FEMA every five years for
approval.
5
MIT PI...i-T), PO A-
� r
Hennepin County Hazard'Mitigatr®n`Plan Planning Process
Attachment 1
R057 ER OF N VffEt)PAR TJTCTR4 A/TS
Rene Maswwa rene.masinda0wellsfarao.com
Michelle Smith michelle.-s.smithe wellsfargo.com Dave Peterson
ChrisTerzich Christopher.I.terzicho_wellsfarao.com 6844 Shingle Creek Parkway
Wayne Brown Wayne.a.brown(a)-wellsfargo.com Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Pat Rath Pat.b.rath(d)wellsfargo.com
_Mark Ber6haFdson mark.bemhardson @ci.bloomington.mn.us
Gene Winstead; qene.wi nstead @ci.bloominaton.mn.us 1
I Charlie Honc_hell j charlie_honchell{,,,,ci.bloomingtommn.usj
Scott Bechthold r sbechthol is i.brooklyn-center.mn.us
Tom Boie; tboie(�ci.brooklyn-center.mn.usi
------...----------_ .._------
C?ff Cracauer ccracauer @edenprairie.oW
Ed Belland 1 edbelland(Mci.medina.mn.us 1
Bob VVaibd bwaibelQci.maple-grove.mn.us
______-._--___-_-____.___ _ ___
Joe Wallin j iWallin0eminnetonka.com
_ Craig ndgAr n –candersonnci_minnetrista.mn.us
Dale Reedy _ _ _ _ dreedOci new-hope mn us i
= ------- --
Al Orsen; alo ftayzata.orq j
Chris Stania _ Chris wavzata.org
_ Ed Povliriski edward.povlinski@.wellsfargo.com i Plymouth Public Works
Cr
_ G._e_—rde_sT' erdesft_.c ci. I mouth.mn.us Pd Y muth Community Develpoment
Mike Goldstein; mgoldstein@ci.glymouth.mn_us
Luke.Stemmer Istemmer stlo_uisp_ark.or4
• _.__..___ John Seifert; _ iseifertO_ci.rogers.mn.us
_Dick Turner' _ _dick.turner@ci.minneapolis.mn.us
Otint Rues CPIRESa stlouispark.orq
—...---�----'--'------'--°---- c d
George Condon GCondonCrDmspmac.org'
Jon Thiel; JonQ!ci.brookll)M-Bark.mn pus
Chad Adams I Ch n-
adadamsCci.medina.mus
_M_issy l atkins melissa.watkins&co.hennepin.mn.us l
Judy Rue Judith.rue _co.hennepin.mn.us
Birch HoItJ_ _ birch.holt c�target.com
Judd freed` _ judd.freedoco.ramsex.mn.us;
Dean Lotter! dlotter@ci.minnetrista.mn.us!
Ben Gozolal bgozola ci.minnetrista.mn.us
_ Chery l Fischer;__ cfischer.CcDci.minnetrista_mn_usl
6
T ITT Plw in Prry .jinn
Hennepin County;'zard l tigetion 'fan planittiing Process
Hennepin County Mews
Public Affairs•612-348-3848 .300 South Sixth Street,Minneapolis,MN 55487-0011
i
May 23;2003 ,
Contact: JudyRue,-Eifiergency Prepai=edriess Division: 763'745-7620
John Knudsen,Public Affairs: 612-348-6883
Hennepin emergency Preparedness to�host pudic meefings
The Heh&pin County Emergency Preparedness Division-is hosting ase�-s-bf inf or al p6lk
meetings throughout the county in June.
The purpose is to gather public comment and participation on the countywide hazard mitigation
plan, which is required by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The hazard mitigation plan examines natural and human-caused threats to Hennepin County and
proposes measures to lessen or eliminate the effects of such events.
The meetings:
W- .6 p.m.,June 4,Maple Grove City Hall,12860"Arbor takes Parkway
■ 6 p.m., June 5, St. Louis Park City Council chambers, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
■ 6 p.m.,June 11,Rogers Community Room, 21201 Memorial Dr.
■ 6 p.m., June 18, Minneapolis City Hall, 350 S. Fifth St., room 220
y6
P.
June 26, Wayzata Community Room,600 nice St.
The Emergency Preparedness Division is responsible for developing plans and programs to
maintain a state of readiness to meet natural, man-made and technological disasters on a local or
countywide basis.
For.more information about the meetings,contact Emergency Preparedness'at 763=745-7625.
7
T)ATT PI...; rt Prnrswa A-
116nnepin County Hazard M-Mg—ati®n Plan Plamiwg-Process
30"
This news release and other news tips and fact sheets are available on Hennepin County's Web site—
www.hnnepin.us—tinder "Public A4f airm"
8
Tl'�TT PIYtm1TR PrMPCQ IIl1(.
Ffennepin--County Haza`rc� Mitigation Fagan Pfannmg Process
Attachment-3
Hazard Anahsis
Basic Information
Name
Title
Contact information
Phone e-mail
Community information
Name address
square miles population
number of employees other
What high profile, political, or symbolic activities take place in the
community? (i.e. courts, controversial industries, etc)
What high risk activities take place in the community? (i.e. handling or storage
of extremely hazardous materials, housing of prisoners)
9
nATT Pl—i—PrM rI-
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Process
HAZARD ANALYSIS BEFIMTIQNS
Probability—choose one
5 Very high Near 1008/o probabihty in the next year-
4 I-ligh Between 60-100%probability in next year,or at least 1 chance in 10 years
3 Medium Between 30-Wlo probability in next year,or at least 1 chance in 20 years
2 Low Between 1-30%probability in next year, or at least 1 chance in 30 years
1 [ Verylow Less than 1%probability, or`1 chance in 100 ears
Magnitude — choose one
5 Very-high, Catastrophic--more"than75A/&-of r-o and/or-staff-is severer affected-
4 High Critical—50-75% of property and/or staff is severely affected
3 Medium Serious—25=-50%-of property, and/or-staff-is-affected
2 Low Limited—5=25% of property and/or staff is affected
1 :Very°Low Neglibtible=less,t an 5°/o'of `ro aad/oF staff s affeeted
Warnirn =timetGnset-of-event=choose-one
5. Very hi N6-warnin
4 High Minimal warning—minutes to hours
3 M6di= -.6-42--hours.warning
2 Low 12-24 hours warning
1 1,Very low- -24+hours warnin
'-Oper tions Continuity--choose-one
5- - Ve lii: " Unable'to continue—cannot provide-75400%of services
4 Hi Sev_erely weakened—cannot. provide 50-75%of services
'3 Medium Weakened—cannot rovide 25-500%'of services
2 Low Somewhat weakened-cannot provide 5-25% of services
1 `1e"4"low -Ne 1 � idle-cannoV rovide 0=5%"of services
Total risk
The ml6er'-t a nuinlier;the greater---a e h'sk
Pl2in first for thase hazards with the highest`score
1`0
il'�Ti PIOnn1T(I PrMneQ r�M.
i
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Process
Community Date
Hazard Probability Magnitude Warning Operations TOTAL Special planning
time continuity RISK considerations see next pa
NATURAL
Blizzard
'Drought
Flood not flash
Hailstorm
Heavy rain/flash
flood
Ice storm
Landslide
Pandemic/epidemic
Severe cold
Severe heat
Tornado
Wildfire
Windstorm
TECHNO
Air pollution
Computer outage
Dam failure
Hacker,virus attack
Haz materials
spills/releases
HVAC outage-
Road closure/access
issue
Telephone outage
Transportation
accident
Utility damage
i.e.sewer backup
Utility outage-
CIVIL/POLITICAL
Bomb,threat
Bomb actual
Civic Events
Civil unrest/protest
rr
i
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Process
Explosion
Fire affects facility
Strikes
Terrorist threat
Terrorist act
Workplace violence
Special Planning Consideralfions
® Proximity to hazardous materials facilities and/or major transportation routes
(including rail)
Vulnerable populations in community
Technology,backup systems, generators, etc. to mitigate effects
Consider relationship between probability and magnitude, i.e. catastrophic event with
low probability versus less serious event with high probability—what will you plan
for first
® Do you have any special circumstances? Please explain.
12
TT\TT Pla-;-Prry-`-
' Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Process
Attachment 4
Questionnaire
This rated how participants felt about certain mitigation issues.
Very Important Somewhat important Neutral Not Very Important Not Important
Protecting private property 10 13 0 2 0
Protecting critical facilities 20 4 0 1 0
Preventing development in 7 10 4 1 0
hazards
Entrancing the function of 5 12 4 2 0
natural features
Protecting historical and 3 10 10 2 0
cultural landmarks
Promoting cooperation among 15 7 2 1 0
public agencies, citizens, non-
profit organizations, and
businesses
Protecting and reducing 14 8 2 1 0
damage to utilities
Strengthening emergency 18 5 1 1 0
services
13
TT\TT Plw inn Prnrpaa Anr.
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan . Planning Process
-Attachment 5
Project Timetable
1103 2103 1 3/03 1 4103 t "3 6/03 1 7!03 8.103 9103 10/03 11103 12.103 1104 2104 3104
Community
Profile
riazara
Identification
Public
Participation
Risk/Vulnerab
ifity
Assessment
Brainstorming
Goals
Brainstorming
Specific
Actions
Write Draft
Plan
Revise Draft
Plan
Adopt f=inal
Plan
Monitor Plan
Implementatio
n
14
T)-kTr Pl—i—Pr—,..'4—.
' Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
III. COMMUNITY PROFILE
Hennepin County is subject to many natural and human caused disasters.
These events could cause injury or loss of life, property damage, and
damage to the infrastructure that would affect the quality of life for its
residents. As development moves west from Minneapolis and its suburbs,
population vulnerability is spread over a wider geographic area. Because
of this, Hennepin County Emergency Preparedness has drafted this
mitigation plan so that hazards are ranked, strategies identified, and goals
set for reducing or eliminating the effects of a natural or human caused
disaster.
Related documents have been consulted to produce this mitigation plan
and are incorporated into this plan by reference: They include:
® Census data
Watershed plans
® FEMA regulations
• Infrastructure maps (sewer, water, etc)
Utility maps
The mapping used in the Hennepin County plan was drawn from the
Hennepin County Transportation Department, the Housing, Community
Works and Transit Department, the Office of Planning and Development,
and the State of Minnesota. Information included is but not limited to
topographies, land use, soils, transportation systems, watershed and
hydrology, and political subdivision boundaries. These sources have
partnered with Emergency Preparedness to provide verifiable data from
original sources.
A. Basic County Information
Hennepin County forms one of the major metropolitan areas in the
United States. It is the largest of Minnesota's 87 counties in
population, budget, and assessed valuation. The 2001 census
estimates the population at 1,114,977 (22.7% of the state's
population), contained in-611 square miles, of which 563 are land and
48 are water. The population center is the county seat, Minneapolis.
The county has 45 cities, one township and 1 unorganized territory.
There are 48 square miles of water in 104 lakes. The lowest elevation
is 680 feet above sea level and the highest point is 1,131 feet above
sea level.
1
Il•\III r:nmmienihr Pmfiln rinr
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
S. History
I
The Dakota American Indians lived in the Hennepin County area long
before European explorers arrived. They were well established in the
culture of hunting and gathering and were skilled in horsemanship.
The main villages were located on the west side of Lake Calhoun and
in Bloomington.
Father Louis Hennepin (for whom the county is named) discovered St.
Anthony Falls in 1680, establishing French ownership. The land
passed from France to Spain and back to France, and in 1803 was sold
to the United States as part of the Louisiana Purchase.
In 1819, Fort Snelling was established at the confluence of the
Mississippi and Minnesota rivers in what is now the southeast corner of
the county. The Territorial Legislature established Hennepin County in
1852, six years before Minnesota became a state. In its early years,
the county was famous for its river industry (lumber, flour milling) but
now has a broad-based economy that includes major retail, financial,
and technological centers (See Industry). The milling industry still has
a strong presence and has branched out into other multi-national
areas.
C. Geography
Hennepin County is located in the Mississippi and Minnesota River
watersheds. Within those major watersheds are three minor:
Minnehaha Creek, Nine Mile Creek, and Riley Purgatory Bluff. The
latitude at Minneapolis is 45°-00'and longitude is 930-15'.
Hennepin County is bounded by the Mississippi.River on the east and
northeast, the Minnesota River to the south, Carver and Wright
Counties to the west and the Crow River to the northwest.
fl•UII (`.nmmionifv Prnfilo tins,
' Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
1 I I Z
I t y I Counues E'ldiacent to I
1 j I u°v.aiav°viia �
I -
f
I I � riCllllC�ll1
tti:.P.?4L-V
4 y _
FE,
i
�==N� • • •=z � I QhPrhiirna I
a�
1 1
> I I
� I I
7 I 1
Additionally, Lake Minnetonka dominates southwestern Hennepin
County. It is obvious that water plays a huge part in the planning
effort. Land use ranges from the densely urban in downtown
Minneapolis to the farms in the western part of the county. Most of
the livestock is horses.
'q
n
I ,, ,+, ,.�, "�� ,& � -•� !!!iliV! yrnlr!,!!�i!� !!! !'7G!!!!G5.9!!! bi�S,!!1!y
�1 r-1 KAMM O CM�L........
* a . ` •• 1 0 NORTH FORK CROW R
l � I
3
n-%I(1 9.nmmiInifv Prnfilo Me
S t
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
� t
E. Geology
The Grantsburg sub lobe of the Des Moines lobe of the Laurentian ice
sheet, the most recent glacier to cross the state, receded from the
Hennepin County area approximately 11,000 years ago. Till (the
unsorted mix of materials deposited by a glacier) from the Des Moines
lobe is gray-brown and contains matter imported from North Dakota
and Canada. The lakes of Hennepin County are proof of the glaciers'
presence.
The Minnesota Geological Survey maps Hennepin as one of the
counties in the generalized distribution map of geological
characteristics for karst formations.
�{It�V'�N Jh/'►/\T/'� �f!"►U/•1 T 1•tt N�1'ti
IVIIl If I1=-ZIU CI: rXCII 010. r_g MU-1
i -
�.��;e�r�ur„e
I
Cowl*4 K5rR AA' orrwIc-iii 4
4'U ilat
thin 100 t of sadime"t cover.
Tend-lon lSwat Amot 4nde lain by
t I r urhan;1*IWArr!tk ainih�n• IN A.
34 of sediment wirer.
L .. !! lily fLyEUiv elndtidI!rt by
J tt
�d Carver ���±�bedrock i�ltli���
30 fL of sedii'�v" It Lti7Y .
dr. � D
F fin Alevmtdr Jr.r.mW m/Yet011 fate
Mmr he mpmduerA wiTh rtllbtrtm.
r)AIII r:nmmttni}v Prnftln dnr
I
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
Karst landscapes are most likely found where limestone and dolostone
are at or near the surface. Karst formations are a direct path to
aquifers, thus making groundwater vulnerable to pollution. Hennepin
County has a number of springs, but the actual karst features are
classified as covered karst, having more than 100 feet of sediment on
top.
Ile
Marst Features in
Southeastern Min ni;sota
Updated: November 2002
Ankip
_ pr i-
—A—L S m-a'1 iris.
At
N
... -.ate.
F. Climate
The climate in Hennepin County is typical of the Upper Midwest of the
United States. Temperatures vary widely according to season. The
highest recorded temperature (all time daily high) was 108 degrees on
July 14, 1936. The lowest recorded temperature (all time daily low)
was minus 34 degrees on January 22, 1936, and January 19, 1970.
The growing season, or average number of days between freezes, is
157 days. The maximum seasonal snowfall was 98.6 inches in the
winter of 1983-84. The maximum seasonal rainfall was 40.15 inches
in 1911, and the maximum rainfall in 24 hours was 10 inches on July
23-24, 1987.
G. Population Growth and Demographics
5
r)-%111 r.nmmionitr Prnfiln rind,
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
European immigrants settled Hennepin County. The 1860 census
noted 12,849 residents. The population in 1960 was 842,854, and the
most recent census figures for 2001 show 1,114,977.
' a 0 6 0 B 'i • 0
! Undzr 5 ! 73.26i ! 328.594 ! 22.20% !
5-ly 1 lU.) 2D1 20.20/0
20-64 696.937 2,890,368 24.1%
65 and over 122,358 594,266 20.6%
Age of Population by Gender
Female Male
Age
r ,
i!.a79 00 to 134 6 627
!'—t 59S 75 to 79 .H owe
16.6Si4 g 7n to 74 17.748 ICI
1e rr!e ROM btti to 79
.
.i...
L
19.121 6n to FA 17.266
�1a 3-- 55 to 59 7A nnA
'i6..16q ;n to 5A
a�vzst
-15 to na a�z9a
47,16; an±n Ad 47.478
as.r,m act„ 39 a•s�tii
4.c'2g9 in to 14 47.344
Aw G�]C
Z't'to •lu Ae CAA
39.662 20 to 24 39.702
oa acn it,tv l u
36.556 10 to 14 38.553
zR 4F� �.rn 4 7R Rt R
t J
::4 q7R 0 to 4 •. . :q7.2R.I
en Ann Sn nM An nM 7A Af7n 7A AM in AM A n 1 n MA 7A Mn ']n AM An AM Cn Ann GA Ann
rOPUICKIOn
Baby Boomers, Born Between 1945 and 1964:
6
I -im (nmmiinifv Prnfila nine,
9
Hennepin County Hazard litigation Plan Community Profile
!
Bloomington 17,560 24,912 29,342 13,358 85,172
Brooklyn Center 7 31Q 9F369 7 986 4 507 29172
Brooklyn Park 19,430 24,097 20,076 3,785- 61713-8--B
Champlin 7,447 7 671 6 260 815 22193
Corcoran 1,842 1,501 2,032 255 5f630
Crystal 5,091 71-57-5 6-,8-2-8 3 204 22,698
Dayton (part) 1431 1 428 1 605 222 4,686
Dee haven 1,176 708 1,553 416 3,853
Eden Prairie 16,719 17,071 18,434 2,677 54,901
Edina 10 838 9 493 1-6-13-29 10,765 47,425
Excelsior 467 854 705 36-7 27,39-a
Fort Snelling 0 10 156 276 442
Golden Valley 4,172 5,067 7,064 3,978 20,2 1
Greenfield 859 775 813 97 2,544
Greenwood 189 138 332 70 729
Hanover(part) 95 88 132 17 332
Hassan Township 810 668 877 108 2,463
Ho kins 3,360 6,920 41-38-2- 2,483 17,145
Independence 974 724 1,273 265 3,236
Long Lake 454 529 - 652 207 1,842
Loretto 167 189 153 61 570
Maple Grove 15,489 15,425 17,409 2,042 50,365
Maple Plain 604 624 627 233 2,088
Medicine Lake 77 95 157 39 368
Medina 1,291 897. 1,540 277 4,005
Minneapolis 84,169 166 352 97,219 34,878 382,618
Minnetonka 11,873 13,055 19,208 7,165 51 301
Minnetonka Beach 179 98 279 . 58 614
Minnetrista 1,277 981 1,779 321 4,358
Mound 2,252 2,974 3f364 845 9,435
New Hope 4,455 6,50-5 6208 3,705 2-0-1873
Orono 2,062 1,627 3,1 3 676 7,538
Osseo 473 758 677 526 2,434
Plymouth 17,866 2-0-_,0-5-9 22,982 4,98 65,894
Richfield 6,971 11 1951 9,884 5 633 34,439
Robbinsdale 3,068 4,641 3,9 7 2 477 .14,123
Rockford art 28 41 58 17 144
Rogers 1F213 1 1 501 685 189 3,588
Saint Anthony (part) 1,122 1,188 1,780 1 574 5f664
Saint Bonifacius 552 710 490 121 1,873
Saint Louis Park 8,279 16 999 12f 370 6 478 44,12-6
Shorewood 2,339 1,559 2,916 586 7,400
Spring Park 159 549 461 548 1,717
Tonka Bay 384 351 676 136 1,547
Wayzata 794 1,011 1451 857 4,113
Woodland 135 67 221 57 480
wta J.� -. JJ.alY4 '�s ti°Yl w�.sLi ✓'1 A w w i .L � 'SwSxJ .�` i.ri'S)i\; y,�yy:it t �.
7
n-1III r..nmmiinifv Prnfilo rfnr
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
Hennepin County's total population has increased by 14% from 1970-
2000. The cities with the greatest increases face the greatest planning
challenges in housing, development, and transportation.
Percent Increase in Population from 1990- 2000
low
e
I
f
-2S to A%Inerpacp
+ !t ts5 25%.T::a%-_a
�'i�vi m�ii+i nrro�co I
6
50%to 75%Increase
' 7r%O/.to I nnoi.,Tnrrancp
8
fl•\III f:nmm„nifv Prnfilo rinr
' Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
The population is growing older as the baby boomers age. This will
result in changes in housing, the workforce, and health care.
Hennepin County Population Density
Persons Age 65 and over
2000
r s
I nRo ger Da yton I \
Hassa n u I 1 1 I
�y� ti 1 1 I ti
rr Flan
1 I I I Brooklyn Park
f Greenfield i Corcoran i Man la 4 oue
d
d 1 1 1 "' : r
J-1
anima } + 4- j"�--�---#
� 'FF�b'°'I` f � f• �
L A 1'
Tndanondanro "l, I rlymoudl --}Vape4 ,i.•r.-,r�•
4.
LF!a pi
j main
1 1 Ma Alne 1 5 1,�T LC r� f '�
I � x ,I .. I-
olaep-:�a�uey
�61�....:wl,�►_ ,3�J 1 ` tikAS� -�.":l e Mi n n sto n k arr
I• rIj T '.
u —+--��
�. Bonitacws 'z
� Fan �i 4 . tea
I ill '�` 1 �r [ ,r•'+,ti
-�� 'r .:n�•ricw va/ywplvtlibvf '. --may '' ,a r i ':� �•;.'�1 �.
rVUUIdIW 11 Ue11:.4Y VI PCIbV 11]rue VV 11 `,SIPmnr1 )
- - -- - - L- r A, _r f
4C
1 I Eden Prairie
V V
9
fl•\III (:nmmllnily Prn51a rinr•
Hennepin County !Hazard Mitigation plan Community profile
In the last 30 years there has been a large increase in immigrant
populations. These recent non-English-speaking residents present a
challenge; they, too must be provided with county services, notified of
any emergency and told what protective action to take.
Percentage of Foreign-born Residents
}
Hanove } �ilamplin_
Vb i }Brooki�rn Park°
Rac d. . Corcoran
t
i art
1
,. .LGidYtii a
i
Independence.
.Medi^O °aviiti�i st G9�°.0 '
€$.yd�CfTi
A Piairl •+� �r� �.
Lb
} *it EiE+iE2riri ;
ossu3 Uilav� t.3 .
WHO
IMfnnetrlsta ' rqr i�inflaniss +y � k
I'. d }des. Lt per.Cll�.�l . .'LVVis t 3-
{ pR�
Wina
Foreign worn as:: w
percentage.of the
total population In
Henneon.county J
Cities: 2[1003 B}O, ton.... 1.
Eden Prairie : :: .
0 - TY6
S - 10%
No Data
i?l< anal Rivers
10
x)-%111 rnmmionifv Prnfilu Ane
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
Foreign Born Residents of
Hennepin County
J RR !II \ 4
40% 1 Prior to lyyu A i�+uR I-Aro
_ I I
_ I i nnn �nnn icnni�
I
I I
Hennepin County Birth Regions of Persons Born as
Citizens of a Country Other than U.S.
rytirfn,_rn
Amenca
An/
74a/, 36%
❑Europe
}fie, UAM"
-
1(%A/ 1 io
11
n-xIII r.nmmi inrfv Crnfiln einr
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
H. Occupational Breakdown
Hennepin County Occupations
0142% � "� ` �l
Ci 2 99 0/.
0 60/" u ii�io
U Management, rroiessionaL and Reiated Occupations(4i ro)
110 Service Occupations(12%) j
in PrndileAnn Trancnnrtatinn Rr.Material Mnvino Clr(-.nnatinnc(1 1°/n)I
a l.VMLI.ULUUiI� Exit cU'Un oc 1VIUMLOILMUC%JUUUPaUUn,k070)
rainnrim. riwnra n, ruicSi.iv tirinr i
12
n-mi r..nmmroniiv Prnfilo rinr
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
I. Income Distribution
a nm ninnocr inrnma rmcirioni-c pro r-nnrnni-rzoTari in Tnc u#ncTOrn ci ini irnc %nrniio
�•�V ••�y��VV•. ���VV•��V •V`I�iIV��W 4t V VVI•VV��V�MbVV ••� �•�V rtVV\V��• VMVM�VV� •t��••V
the lower income residents live in Minneapolis and the first ring sl tdirks,
1�dord i+i9en�f4 tg^cw - 5 '
t
_ _ l fiat p�yp € a .' r'
ter-__.7..y r
n 4 1Gihft
F t
50 00i - $7.5 000 � b
00MI -$153,891
I YGT{lireMf!�.L�Y7i"�.
0kes'.and Rivers
13
Il•1111 f:nmmiinifv Prnfifa tine
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
Hennepin County Income Distribution
1 I 11
I�<-$10,000 t!
I®$10,000-19,999 !
! SuuUU ! ! T !
n nnn_ o., i!
� �a�
r,-An nnn-Aa aag 11
-,- II
I ai I 1■4114+111 VVU-+9,9a9 ll
I 20000 1 im$60,000-74.999 11
e/1,nnn L uuu u
z iuuv0 : {m$100,000-124,99911
1 1 I -II
! I I®$i 25,vi 14a,0UU 11
[3$150,000-1199,9 991 I
1 11 Il:UllltL 1 I 1
I 1 ri x$200.000 H
li
7 !.�J...L...
J. 11UU1�. tl
i
® al
SY
aLCIIC UI 1.111111CJVlQ ! JIC : UUVCI1111 ICI IL I
United States Federal Government
Government
Target Corporation Retailer
University of Minnesota Education
Mao Foundation Health Care
Allina Health Foundation Health Care
3M Company Manufacturer
Fairview Health Services Health Care
Northwest Airlines Transportation
Wells Fargo Bank Banking
Minnesota N.A.
A number of companies of national and international stature have their roots
in Hennepin County:
of The thermostat, the product that made Honeywell famous, was invented
in.Minneapolis. Today,.Honeywell is an international corporation famous
14
I -un nnil llnifv Prnfila Anr
Hennepin t Hazard-Mitigations Plan C Profile
-
not only for its ubiquitous round thermostats, but also for its leadership in
the avionics industry.
• General-MiNs-started-out as the Minneapolis Milling Company in 1856. The
first flour mill was built near St. Anthony Falls in 1866. The partners,
Cadwaller Washburn and John Crosby formed the Washburn-Crosby
Company, producer of Gold Medal Flour. In 1924 the company lent its
initials to a radio station, WCCO.
• Pillsbury was founded in 1869. The "XXXX"symbol on the flour bags
signified the highest quality. The company merged with General Mills in
2000.
• Target Corporation began in 1902 when George Dayton opened the
Dayton Dry Goods Company on the corner of 7th and Nicollet in
Minneapolis. Dayton's opened Southdale, the first enclosed shopping mall
in the nation, in 1956 in Hennepin County. The first Target store opened
in 1962; there are now 1,107 Target stores operating in 47 states.
• Medtronic, maker of the first reliable long-term implantable pacemaker,
was founded in 1949 in Minneapolis. Today it is one of the world's
leading medical technology companies.
15
Il•1111 C..nmmienihr Prnfila Anr
r r - r ■
■ lr
fit
t. rr' Cry 4'S.
Y,r. ���� - �+'r• fir, +.�"s" #:-J�7i-r—n�;,��y-.
� tar �t'�,��F•T t 4 .�� r � � —- _
u r
■�G' � ��� `" � � � �� �� - #tom=.H:
e
r
'Hennepin County-Hai-ar-d Plan Community Prole
L. Housing and Community Development
Value of Ownerroccttpf Units
1%
20/61 o,
I
TPA,-
a , A,- 17% a
!. I a<$50,000(1%)
I. '14"/0 I II [I,dil�Tfa$99 $(1 In) I T:
I \ I
U.5 I V`v'O is$1 (38°1;6)
l 1
'19$209,000 fO$29_a 9-99 IJAOM TJ
20,10 / /.lfl%n Iu�y�il,wv,vvv��Ov/ II
.F
1G l L1�,7A7 T.-7
r3 or 4
to 9 12,6411 2.�
14 to 19 27,56- 5.9
7.7
der MOM
i
•a_La_ V_�
rrrvurMf-I nun e
jQ�1�6y R1Lg V.VLk, r. 7 i17 i
i
e
17
1)•1111 1'nmmnnifv Prnfiln Anr
Hennepin County Hazan 8 Mitigation Plan Community Profile
Year Structures Were Built
I. 11U,UUU
inn nnn
1
an nnn F` # a 101990 to 1994 �.{.
i u i 4'U u to
In 1070 to 19719
gl�,oi7U. °� "� JO 1960 to 1969 j.i.
1 ..�. �s
M l.''.t1 .+' 11
14v A tG'i959 I I
VT
{ UtJLJ ,- To 1939 or earAer t.r.
S
Butaea, z3rn4 or LP gas ij,10-9. LAF.
` ectricity 49,2 ' �v
A r-7r 4 n
nat nr rnka
lwood 3551 0.11
boar a ie gy 6v t` :u
.het' f!!e! 4,3� 1.,,
�O'suet used* . , 0.71
r)-1111 rnmm„nifv Prnfila r!nr '
Hennepin :.o-Unq Hazard mitigation Man CaM..M.-Unity rroMe
1 onbinn nhzn,% jinn f-AAIe+ine- i 012� AA
Il.,b/\,1\I11� \.VIIIYI\.L\. }/14111Y111� 14\.1114\.) 1,JJV V. 1
I arkinn rnmniptP kitrhPn farilitiPs 21126 0-4
---- a..- -- - -
No telephone service ! 3,79"i_ U.
Vehicles in Household
14%n 11°l0
y,4
/ I EI Nnnc+ (110/ l
I j 0 2 (3w"/0/ 11
110>$ (14%, I�
t
.. R.. Environment
Hen nepin:..County has a rich-and-varied environment::.=.The County-:and its
communities are committed to preserving-it for posterity. Examples include.-
e Protection of-the endangered cricket frog population in Nine Mile Creek
in Bloomington (the only site in the state where this species is found)
e Conservation practices for new housing-developments such as Wild
Meadows in Medina-. This-345-acre development includes-prairie and
wetland restoration, a storm water treatment system, and 200 acres of
open space.
0 Study of the structure and flow of the Prairie du Chien and Jordan
Aquifers so that contamination can be tracked and prevention plans
can be developed.
19
x'1.1111 (:nmmlniN Drnfilo`inr
Hennepin Coy art Mitigation-Plan- Community Profile
o Minneapolis Chain of Lakes Lakeshore Restoration Project
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has identified two Scientific
and Natural Are-as(SNA).in Hennepin County:
The-Woisfeld Woods SNA in Long Lake is s-a premier-exarnple of the
original "Big Woods"that once covered south central Minnesota. Very
few-remnants-remain-due to urban-expanses and Industriat-
development.
The Wood-Rill SNA is-another-remnant of the Big Woods-that--runs-over
the steep.hills of the St. Croix moraine. It includes undisturbed old-
growth,forest, a-wet meadow;and.a moist 110wland-foresti
I
Pollution can:have a significant effect on the environment: As-of.August 8,
2003, Hennepin County had no active sites on the National.Priorities-List of
Superfunde sites. Locations that had been on the list-have-been either deleted
or have been mitigated.
The�most-serious of-these-sites was the Reilly Tar-&-Cher-mc-al-Corporation
located in PSt. Louis Parka .Soil and groundwater were contaminated with
predominantly polynucldar aromatic hydrocarbons:
The Prairie du Chien°and'Iordan-aquifers rVvere-contaminated affecting-the
drinking water of 43,000 people. That aquifer also recharges the Mississippi
from which Minneapolis draws its-drinking water.'-
, -Hennepin County has-two air quality monitoring stations that measure ozone
and particulate matter: The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency uses this
data to issue-air-qualiity°'alerts.
302/312 facilities are-mapped -and on file in the County Emergency
Preparedness Office and each individual jurisdiction.
N.''Transportation-6—nd-Corntnuting-Patternt
The-history of transportation in Hennepin County has its roots in its fakes and
rivers. It began with canoes of cedar wood and birch.bark used by Native
Americans and'-by Father Louis Hennepin, who discovered St. 'Anthony-Falls.'-
In 1819 the first keelboats came up the Mississippi followed by the first
steamboat in 1823. Barge traffic continues to be an essential link in the
transportation chain.
The first air passenger service was offered by the Jefferson Transportation
Company (ITC), which operated a tri-motor between the Twin Cities and
Rochester. JTC and Universal Airlines-later merged-with Northwest Airways, a
precursor to Northwest Airlines.
20
8-mi (.nmmainifv Prnfilo rinr
r-lennepin-County Nazard MUgation Plan Community Prefle
Land-transportation developed-as people from the-eastern-states and.Europe:.:
settled the area. In the early 1800s, Red River ox carts made the trip from
what is now the Tway Cities to Pembina, Alberta in-Canada in 75-days. -On
July 2, 1862, the first train rolled into St Anthony; it had been transported by
steamboat,fr-om-La-Cros-se-, Wisconsin. After,World,War I the-automobile-
became affordable and in 1920 a State Highway System of 6,700 miles was
-approved. The,automobile-is the-most-heavily used-mode of transportation
today. The Interstate freeway system serves Hennepin County as well as
state-highways,and county roads.
Tbr,ee quarters-of Hennepin County-commuters drive-to-work alone in an
automobile. In the ten years from 1990-2000, bus and car pool users
declined and the workers-who drive-alone-increased. This-ha-s-an-effect on-
air quality, road congestion, and road construction.
M€tro.Transit, the main mass transit-provider in-Hennepin County, has
increased users by 18% in the last four years. The Hiawatha Light Rail line
wall-be c€inpleted from-downtown'Minneapills-to-the MalW-Arnerica and-the
Minneapofs-St. Paul International-airport by summer 2004:
® o �
v o
-
Drive Alone. 7420/4 74.9%
Carpool 9.8% 9.5%
Bus -7.5% -7-1%
Other 5.2% 4.6%
Worked at Home 13%,
21
M%111 (:nmmiinifv Drnfilo rinr
Hennepin minty Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Profile
Travel,time-to work-for Hennepin County..:
f pts
r
I4 .. �3.,. ® 14%
I C9 I.ACC than.S mini_ltac(70/n) r 110/n
IttI -I�-minutes t "/oj IP fir. $boo
I �1�T 1'T I IOI IULG7`1 J7I1� I
❑15-19 minutes(18%) 0 4n/0 !�
ll D 10-14 minutes(1"`Jo)
1125-29 minubes(8%) # g,' ®2% f
1030-34�(14%)
i®35-39 minubes(311/o) { „ .„n, 1` 19 1`x/0
I I 1 1. 1. �v i '
3r
K 345-59 minims(40/6) I I I f
I� ,__ 1. LLGJ%0 I
�rr$v U7 nm l' 7
ff g nn ..in..�..r „�„ l L 0o, 1
II JV IIIIIIYV..J V1 -..A \i/V/ I V/U
I.
o. Special Planning Considerations
For emergency preparedness planning-purposes the county is divided-into-five`
planning groups:
22
n-%ill (:nmmllnity Prnfilo rinr
Hennepin Ccunq H.-mard mitigation Sian Conei nunit'j rron e
Dayton, Rogers, Corcoraaf, Hassan Township, Greenfield
il Brooklyn C'PntPr Rrnnkivn Park Champlin C'rvctal rnlrlpn
-- --'--r-' --•".,��--1 -- --�-,ice--,' - ---'i --• ---r•--'r -' i----1 -------' �,
RnhhincrlalP St Anthnnv
G",. -t�!Q!eii7�'N odlaff�F,l��fl'I�j�i�;Miifi�f i5it7f�[:.. j
Rnnifarhic Mniinrl rlrnnn/I nnn I alra/Minnatnnk:i
_,,Beaehrpr g-Park-, outh-Lak
Lake _ MinnatnnLn/Fvralcinr/r-raarnnt�n nri/r;hnratnt nnti/Tnnlra Rau
Three-Rivers Park-Distict Va <ataaest
Nannanin/Tnriananrlanra/Manly Dlain
l`II
.
BE: iixg`t ;���n-t'rariri�; �dir��; Hopkins,_M" Ot-ropeiitanx �
Tr-ne-i} r^nmmiccinn Minnn�nnL� Ct 1 n11ic D�rL Dir-hFinlr�
1J e I I4I IJIL VVI 11111/J.JIVI 1, 1 fit 111V1.Wl IMA, .116. VVlA1J 1 411%, 1%§x..111 MANNA
University.'of-Minnesota
U III:T:IIfI 1. %-ILV of 1-11S,Itcu}tvila
Hennepin County has a number of large venues that could be targets for
terrorist attack:
• Mall of America, Bloomington
• Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome
• Target Center
• City/County Government campus
• Minneapolis Convention Center
• University of Minnesota
Minneapolis-St. Paul International airport is one of the busiest in the world
with more than half a million takeoffs and landings per year. Northwest
Airlines has a significant presence in the Pacific Rim, Asia, and Southeast
Asia. Flights to and from those destinations could be cause for concern
because of the possibility of Sudden Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS).
Hennepin County has a number of industries that have sensitive defense
contracts. For security purposes they are not listed here; local plans deal with
them.
23
r)-%111 (`e%mmllnity Prnfit&rinr
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Priorities
VIII. Priorities
Each jurisdiction was given the opportunity to rate every mitigation
possibility mentioned in this plan. The items were put into a table and
the emergency manager rated each one low, medium, or high priority.
The numbers are the total.
Some of the projects affect a small number of people, and the ratings
reflect that. However, when funding becomes available, Hennepin
County and its jurisdictions will look at the possible projects to
determine if the original evaluation is still valid.
Priorities are constantly changing. Budgets, policies, and changes in
elected officials can affect what is considered important. Emergency
managers in Hennepin County are committed to keeping mitigation
itself a priority and will continue to pursue opportunities to lessen or
eliminate the effects of disaster on our citizens and our property.
1
' Hennepin County Hazard Litigation Priorities
Mitigation Priorities
TOTAL 1-15-04
°Il`a �- �y as�� � trsro,CVYRIJ����. •"� .qn,. �;-' .-` 's ,�, 8� �,4",."' s>�T1��',t�
Low Med High
5 5 6 Safe rooms or public shelters in developments with slab-on-grade construction
5 6 4 Inventory contents of tunnels under downtown Minneapolis streets
2 7 7 Public service campaign on personal responsibility in disasters (be prepared, et
6 6 4 Minneapolis Waterworks redundancy
6 7 3 Harden transportation hubs
6 8 2 Improve communications in the Mall of America
1 10 5 Improve storm sewer systems to prevent urban flooding (areas TBD)
8 6 2 Move utilities underground in the Lake Minnetonka area
0 6 10 Purchase generators for critical facilities
9 3 4 Public service campaign on wind resistant construction
6 8 2 Remove repetitive loss structures
5 8 3 Hwy 55 & General Mills Blvd—correct flooding in heavy rain
10 4 1 Osseo—flooding of basements during heavy rain in area of 1 8t Ave NW south to
Hwy 81
8 5 1 St Anthony Blvd and Silver Lake Rd—street flooding during heavy rain
8 7 1 Flooding of homes in Champlin due to ice jams on the Mississippi
11 1 1 Buy out old Mollen residence on Co Rd 144—flooding
11 2 2 Berm 5 house area on the Mississippi in Dayton—repetitive flooding
9 5 1 Medina—Tamarack Rd & Elm Creek—floods during heavy rain
9 5 1 Hassan Twp—Tucker& Bechthold Rd flooding during heavy rain
9 5 1 Hassan Twp—Co Rd 144 &Willandale flooding during heavy rain
8 6 1 Greenfield—Co Rd 50 north of entrance to Rebecca Park—flooding during
heavy rain
9 5 1 City of Rockford—Tower Trailer Park—flooding of mobile homes during heavy
rains
1 Other - Creation of freeway access point along 1-94 between Co Rd 30 in Maple
Grove and Hwy 101 in Rogers. No access point to freeway for hazmat or
multiple vehicle accidents
2
Hennepin County Hard Mitigation Plan Goals, Objectives, &.Strategies
VII. Goals, Objectives, Strategies
Overarching Goal - to identify measures that will prevent loss
of life and damage to property while reducing future risks in
Hennepin County
Some strategies are specific to certain locations; others are more
general. This is because of the nature of the hazard. For example,
floods occur in fairly predictable places and windstorms do not.
It is difficult to prioritize the strategies because Hennepin County has
50 jurisdictions; each jurisdiction will set its own priorities. When
funds are available to do a project, the Mitigation Steering Committee
will have input on county-wide priorities.
A. Goal - to prevent flood damage
1. Objective —to prevent spring runoff flood damage to
property
a. Strategy — identify areas of repetitive loss
L City of Dayton berm building
opportunity
ii. City of Champlin flood areas due to ice
buildup
iii. Hassan Township County Road 116 and
the Crow River bridge
iv.. Hassan Township buyout of residence
on 141St Ave N
b. Strategy— prioritize possible projects within
communities and make initial contact with elected
officials
2. Objective —to prevent damage to property from
flooding due to heavy rain
a. Strategy — Look at areas that flood during
heavy rain
L City of Medina —Tamarack Road and
Elm Creek
1
11 Il/II (:nala rlhierfivoc Cfrafoniae rinr
' Hennepin County Hard Mitigation Plan Goals, Objectives, & Strategies
ii. Hassan Township —Tucker and
Bechthold Road, County Road 144 and
Willandale
iii. City of Greenfield — County Road 50
north of entrance to Rebecca Park,
Vernon and Basswood, Greenfield Road
and 78th Lane, Greenfield Road just
north of Hwy 55
iv. City of Rockford —Tower Terrace Trailer
Park
b. Strategy — prioritize possible projects within
communities and make initial contact with
elected officials
3. Objective —to prevent damage to property from
flooding due to inadequate infrastructure
a. Strategy — map areas of flooding due to inadequate
infrastructure
i. City of St Anthony — Silver Lake Road
and St. Anthony Blvd street flooding
ii. City of Osseo — flooding of basements in
area of 1st Ave NW south to Hwy 81.
b. Strategy — educate citizens about how to avoid this
type of flooding
L Promote installation of backflow valves
in residences
ii. Promote value of elevating furnace,
water heater and other basement
machinery
4. Objective -to prevent damage caused by dam or levee
failure
L Make sure dams and levees are properly
maintained
ii. Ensure that those living in proximity to
dams and levees have an emergency
plan
B. Goal — to prevent wind damage to persons and property from
tornadoes, windstorms, straight line winds, and thunderstorms
2
I'1.1\/II male(lhiortiiioc Cfra4eniac rin�
Hennepin County Hard Mitigation Plan Goals, Objectives, & Strategies
1. Objective —to prevent damage to persons and property
from tornadic activity
a. Strategy — help citizens realize the strength and
danger of tornadoes
L Use Severe Storms Awareness Week to
emphasize the power of tornadoes
ii. Discourage the use of video cameras to
film dangerous storms
b. Strategy — Promote safe rooms
L Get testimonials from those who have
benefited from a safe room
ii. Urge local builders to put safe rooms in
structures with no basements, especially
slab on grade townhouses
c. Strategy — Pass ordinances that require community
shelters in developments that have slab on grade
housing
2. Objective —to prevent damage to persons and property
from windstorms and straight line winds
a. Strategy — educate the public on the dangers of wind
L Put up booths at local celebrations
ii. Hand out brochures at parades
b. Strategy — Promote safe rooms— see 13113ii
C. Goal —To mitigate losses to people and property during severe
winter weather (blizzards and extremely cold temperatures)
1. Objective - Urge public to heed winter weather
warnings and advisories
2. Objective - Promote winter survival kits during Winter
Weather Awareness Week and beyond
D. Goal —To mitigate losses to people and property during drought
or extreme heat
1. Objective - Review community water plans and update
as needed
3
n•tim nAsvia n},IPI}1\/PC C}ra}PAIPC/IA!
Hennepin County Hard Mitigation Plan Goals, Objectives, & Strategies
2. Objective - Check with local social services
organizations to identify those who are susceptible to
heat-related illness
i. Elderly&very young
ii. Identify sources of fans and air
conditioners
iii. Map possible shelters to open
E. Goal —to mitigate losses to people and property in the event of an
infectious disease outbreak or a terrorist incident
1. Objective — to help citizens survive an infectious
disease outbreak
a. Strategy — Plan with public health officials
L Deal with quarantine issues ahead of
time
H. Identify sites for mass clinics and what
will be needed to equip and staff them
b. Strategy — Educate public on precautions to take
2. Objective —to help the community survive a terrorist
incident whether domestic or foreign in origin
a. Strategy — make sure first responders are properly
equipped and trained
L Grant money is spent wisely
ii. Appropriate training is given and
refreshed
b. Strategy — Give the public information on basic
measures that can be taken to protect themselves
L Common sense directions
ii. Simple, easy to follow
iii. Designed not to cause either panic or
ridicule
F. Goal — to mitigate the effects of an earthquake or incident caused
by karat topography
1. Objective —to be aware of geology in each community
and know if these hazards exist there
2. Objective —to avoid placing sensitive structures in
areas where earthquakes or karst features could cause
structure damage or collapse, i.e. sinkholes
4
I'1.1\/II /:Hale llhiortioc Chafanioc Inr
Hennepin County Hard Mitigation Plan Goals, Objectives, & Strategies .
G. Goal — to lessen the effects of solar storms on people and
property
1. Objective — keep current on sunspot cycles
2. Objective — harden sensitive communications
equipment to the effects of a geomagnetic or solar
storm
H. Goal — to lessen the effects of a radiological incident or release
on people and property
1. Objective —to eliminate exposure to radiological
sources
a. Strategy — train first responders on time, distance,
and shielding
b. Strategy — enhance ability to detect radiological
sources
2. Objective —to have a trained cadre to monitor
exposure to radiation
a. Strategy — Community Health Department (CHD) staff
will be trained in radiological monitoring
b. Strategy — CHD will practice at the Monticello Nuclear
Generating Plant reception center drill and exercise
I. Goal — to lessen the effects of a hazardous materials release on
people and property
1. Objective — Know locations of fixed facilities
a. Strategy — Get a 302 list from HSEM every year
b. Strategy — make site visits to those facilities that pose
the most threat
2. Objective — Have copies of 302 facility plans in the
emergency management office and/or the fire
department
3. Objective —work with facility coordinators so that they
are aware of local capabilities and vice versa
a. Strategy— train together
b. Strategy — exercise together, with site-specific
scenario
s
r1.11/II r.nale Miartivac Cfrafaniae Anr
Hennepin County Hard Mitigation Plan Goals, Objectives, & Strategies
J. Goal — to lessen or eliminate negative effects of water supply
contamination
1. Objective — keep water supply safe
a. Lock doors on water facilities
b. Require proper identification or code for access to
water facilities
c. During orange (or higher) alerts, put on extra patrols
d. Safeguard aquifers by maintaining a strong wellhead
protection program
2. Objective — Have alternate water supply
a. Strategy — look into sharing with neighbors
b. Strategy — Identify sources of potable water
3. Objective — conserve water
a. Strategy — update community water plan as needed
b. Strategy — identify triggers for implementation of
water conservation measures
6
n•ani (�nalc(lhiorfivnc Crr�toniec rinr
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
W HAZARD RISK/VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
A. Overview of Risk/Vulnerability Assessment
An essential element of the Hennepin County Mitigation Plan is an
analysis of hazards and the risk they pose. Hennepin County
Emergency Preparedness has divided the county into sectors for
planning purposes. Sectoring,is often used to separate a county into
manageable segments based on local geography and other factors.
Below are the following 5 sectors.
B. Synopsis of Risk/Vulnerability Assessment
Individual hazards were evaluated for each city in the Sectors. The
City Emergency Manager completed a worksheet and evaluated each
hazard's probability, magnitude, warning time, and effect on
operations continuity for their jurisdiction. These worksheets were
then evaluated by sector and tabulated. See Appendix B for
worksheet example.
The scale was 1-5 with 5 the worst case. The highest possible score
was 20. The worksheet was adapted from the FEMA mitigation
guidance and beta tested on the Lake Minnetonka area emergency
managers. They made suggestions and clarifications that were
incorporated into the final document. Numbers were simply added
.horizontally to get the total score.
Vulnerabilities were identified by the local emergency managers. The
EMs looked at critical infrastructure that could be open to attack by
either natural events or terrorist activities. The effect that the loss
would have on the jurisdiction was also taken into account. Threat
and vulnerability assessments done for ODP grant purposes helped this
process along, although that focus was on weapons of mass
destruction and terrorism. At this time, the likelihood of a natural
disaster is considered higher than a WMD/terrorism event. Both,
however, must be planned for.
The map section provides additional general information on
vulnerabilities. A 302 facility map, floodplain map, groundwater, steep
slopes, bridges, and schools and daycare maps tell where vulnerable
populations are located. The zoom feature in Adobe allows individual
assets to be seen. Infrastructure, existing and future buildings, and
critical facilities are too numerous to list specifically in a major
metropolitan county context. The maps must be used as needed.
i
Tl•\V T-T...-1 Rial.Vnlnornhility AaaPCemnnt Inn
Hennepin County Hazard mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
To estimate losses, EPD relies on the County Auditor to provide
overlays of the affected area that provide the assessed value of
structures. It is not practical to do this for the purpose of this plan.
2
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
C. Sector 1 — Minneapolis
The first Sector is the City of Minneapolis. The population of this
sector is approximately 382,618. It is predominantly urban setting.
The Mississippi River cuts through the upper northeast section.
_ 3 i
w
I
`YHA 1
f
6
u a
i
3
T)AV W—rri Riak_Vnln hility 4acnocmont rinr.
• ' ' Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
i. Risks
16 Terrorist act
I I �
16 Utility outage
16 Telephone outage
15 I Haz materials spills
I -4 1 i:aav'RSi-k/Haas i 01100d I
14 Ice Storm
14 1 Tornado 1
14 Explosion
14 1 Utility damage
14 Transoortation accident
1{r 14 Road closure/access issue
1 1J VY IIIUJWrim 1
13 Blizzard
13 r Hacker,virus attack
13 HVAC outage
i r I
13 Fire affects facility
13 Bcmh threat
12 Workplace violence
I iZ Ov-it n-C
12 Terrorist threat
1 11 I Bomb actual
11 Civic events
11 Hailstorm
11 Civil unrest/omtest 1
10 Severe cold
9 Dam failure �
9 Air pollution
9 Severe heat
8 Pandemic/epidemic
f
8 Strikes
7 Wildfire
1 b
Drought
4 Landslide
4
T)AV LTavarA RiO-Viilno Wlav A.—..--t A-
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability .
2. Vulnerabilities
• Water utility — supplies Minneapolis and 7 other communities
• No interconnect with St. Paul
• No way to store many days worth of water
• Waterworks located on the Mississippi where spills are
common
a Vulnerable populations
• Elderly, impaired and disadvantaged
G Concentrated in high rises
■ Possibility of rapid spread of disease
• Immigrant population
• Tuberculosis in recent immigrants
• Difficulty communicating emergency
information to non-English speaking
populations
O Infrastructure
• Major telephone switching facility downtown
• Unknown what is below downtown streets
• Computer systems could be open to attack
• Some storm sewers cannot handle significant rainfall
• Transportation
• Freeways
• In path of airport
• Train switching yard in NE Minneapolis
• Light rail
• University of Minnesota
• Potential for volatile population
• Unknown chemicals on campus
• Politically sensitive, activities
• Large venues
o HHH Metrodome
o Target Center
o Convention Center
o Many large hotels
• 302 facilities (123) see map
5
n.%v W.—.l Ricl_VnlnPrwhility AccvicemPnt A-
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
• Repetitive loss structures (f as defined-by the NFIP)
3. Mitigation Opportunities
• Interconnect Ntinneapotis and, St. Paut water utilities
• Inventory underground utility areas downtown
• Secure transportation:hubs
• Plan, train, exercise and share information with the
University of Minnesota
• Work with facility managers on security measures at large
.venues
• Remove or rehabilitate repetitive loss structures
• Maintain/apgrade-city-forester:program so that trees can
withstand storms
4. Current/Completed Projects
• Planning and exercising with Metro Transit
• Bus
• Light rail
• Planning and exercising with the University of Minnesota
• Major chemical facility has been cleaned up
• Flooding in south Minneapolis was mitigated as a result of
disaster in 1998
• Minnehaha creek mitigation
• Edison High School
• Holding ponds created
• Vulnerable populations
• Halls sprinkled and smoke detectors placed in high
rises and schools
• ECHO (Emergency and Community Health Outreach)
will provide emergency information to non-English
speaking populations
• Large venues
o Two exercises held at the Convention Center with
active facility participation
S. RECOMMENDA77ON
The City of Minneapolis should incorporate mitigation into
other planning or policy-making efforts such as building
codes and zoning ordinances whenever possible.
G
T)AV P.—A Aial_V.ilnPrahility Haar cem�t ing
Hennepin County Hazard mitigation lisktVulnerabiiity
D. Sector 2 —South Suburban
The Second, or South Suburban sector includes the cities of
Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park,
Richfield, a portion of Chanhassen, and the area of Minneapolis/St Paul
International Airport as well as Fort Snelling. The approximate
population for Sector 2-is 334;9517:
tip,
w
�� mar •n�'.: +I° � 1_
5.in r�.Zb 1 9•'
S 1'
1
�L
TT\V N.—d Ric4_V.ilnvrnhility AccPeemnnt A-
Hennepin County hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
13 Utility Damage
13 1 la u
13 Telephone outage
HVAC:outage
13 Haz Mat spills
13 Hacker,virus attack
13 Computer outage
12 Windstorm
12 f Transportation accident
12 Hailstorm
12 —� Fire affects facility..
12 I Explosion
12
12 Bomb actual
w4ma d+•- I
11 Terrorist act
ii Ice S-orm
11 Heavy rain/flash flood
' 10 ' Workplace Violence '
10 Wildfire
10 Road closure/access issue
10 Civic events
9 Terrorist threat
9 Severe cold
9 Pandemic/epidemic
9 l,4nrest prQte&
8 I Strikes
SEyere heat. I
7 Flood
i r i Drought I
7 Air Pollution
5 Landsnde
5 Dam failure
20-17-Very-Higtr 16-13-High-
12-9 Medium . 8-5 LOW
4-A Very Low
8
T)AV N.—A Ria4_V lnPrnhility 4acncamont 1�r
Hennepin County hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
2. Vulnerabilities
• Mail of America
• World famous venue
• Proximity to international airport
• Attracts large numbers
• Politically sensitive businesses
• Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP)
• Serves 34 million passengers annually
• Northwest Airlines has a significant presence in the
Far East, origination point of SARS and swine flu
o Reliever airport Flying Cloud in Eden Prairie
o Most of the South sector is in the flight path of MSP
• 302 facilities (111) — see map
• Vulnerable populations
• Elderly, impaired
• Concentrated in high rises
• Possibility of rapid spread of disease
• Immigrant population .
• Tuberculosis in recent immigrants
• Difficulty communicating emergency
information to non-English speaking
populations
• Transportation
• Freeways
• In path of airport
• Light rail
• Railroads
• Flooding
• Nine Mile Creek
• Pioneer Creek
• Purgatory Creek
• Low-lying areas
• Repetitive loss structures (as defined by the NFIP)
• Bloomington (1)
• Edina (5)
• St. Louis Park (1)
9
T)AV Nn-s M Rid-Veil—hilitu 4t`inn
• Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
3. Mitigation Opportunities
• Mali of America (MOA)
• Improve radio communications between MOA and
local public safety
• Plan, train, and exercise with local public safety
• Work with facility managers and security
• Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport
o Increase coverage of emergency power to protect
critical functions
o Plan, train, and exercise airport disasters with local
public safety
• Improve storm sewer system to prevent flooding in low
areas
• Remove or rehabilitate repetitive loss structures
• Put utilities underground when possible
• Maintain/upgrade city forester program so that trees can
withstand storms
4. Current/Completed Projects
• Planning, training & exercising with MOA (2 in past 12
months)
• St. Louis Park 2002 Flood Mitigation Project
• Superfund site in St. Louis Park remediated (Reilly Creosote)
• Vulnerable populations
o Halls sprinkled and smoke detectors placed in high
rises and schools
o ECHO (Emergency and Community Health Outreach)
will provide emergency information to non-English
speaking populations
• Planning, training and exercising with the Minneapolis/St.
Paul International airport (1 full scale in past 12 months)-
• Minneapolis/St. Paul International airport participated in the
mitigation planning process for Hennepin County
• Minnetonka — buyout of single family dwelling on Minnehaha
Creek near County Road 73
ro
TT\V N.v.,d 1?;QV_Vid�o Nlity 4ea --t A-
Hennepin Country Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vutnerabitity
S. RECOMMENDATION
The cities of the South Suburban planning area should
incorporate mitigation into other planning or policy-making
efforts such as building codes or zoning ordinances
whenever possible.
it
TT\V T-T.—d Rialr_Vnlnnrnhility Aaanaamnnt iinr.
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
E. Sector 3 — Lake Minnetonka
The third sector, or Lake Minnetonka sector includes the cities of
Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood, Independence, Long Lake, Loretto,
Maple Plain, Medina, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, Orono, Shorewood,
Spring Park, St Bonifacius, Tonka Bay, and Wayzata. The approximate
population or Senor, 3 is'6x,335.
1
IwiL -
-
_ 5� ,' 'pan:,. � •��. 4'� y `,:�.
� ���� It •2� t' .„ .a
x y rr�
d z MAI w
_ �� I
y d
12
r)-\V T-T.•s A PW-V,ilnProW14i Aoa —m—t l-
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
1. Risks
1
?�5 I TornadoI
15 Fire affects facility
15 I C... Outer I
14 Windstorm
14 dliiy Outage
14 Transportation accident
14 Telephone outage
14 Haz Mat spills
14 Hacker,virus attack
13 Utility Damage
I I ;
13 Ice Storm
13 Explosion
13 Bomb actual
13 Blizzard
12 Terrorist act
12 I Hg t f! sh ftod
12 Hailstorm
11 Workplace Violence
II I Road closuroac cess issue
11 Civic events
10 I Wildfire I
10 Severe heat
10 Civil unrest/protest
9 Terrorist threat
9. Severe cold
8 Pandemic/epidemic
8 HVAC outage
8 I Flood
7 Strikes
I 7 1 I
7 Drought
I 37 I Air l v t. I
5 Dam failure
20-17 Very High 16-13 High
12-9 Medium 8-5 Low
4-0 Very Loan!
13
r)AV T-T. —4 A---t jinn
e
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
2. Vulnerabilities
• take Minnetonka
0 14,000 acres
o bounded by 14 cities
o Large boating population in summer
• Weather events
• Exurban and rural area
• Tornado — significant touchdown in 1965
• Floods
• Ice storms— lines not repaired for several days
• Warning/notification
• New developments may not be covered by sirens
• People do not react appropriately to sirens
• 302 facilities (31) — see map
• Repetitive loss structures (as defined by the NFIP)
• Tonka Bay (1)
• Wayzata (1)
3. Mitigation Opportunities
• Move utilities underground to avoid outages during ice
storms and summer storms
• 'Purchase generators for critical facilities during power
outages
• Encouragement of use of NOAA weather radios— require in
new developments
• Public education on meaning of sirens and proper action to
take
• Remove or rehabilitate repetitive loss structures
• Encourage wind resistant construction and retrofit
• Enlarge culverts — Example —Tamarack(toad in Medina
(would also affect Elm Creek)
4. Current/Completed Projects
• All cities in the Lake Minnetonka area have agreed to a joint
emergency operations plan
14
nAV W.—d A.--t A-
1
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vuinerability
• In Medina homeowners in new developments are urged to
buy weather radios
® Medina, Maple Plain, and Independence have lift stations
configured identically so that generators can be hooked up
quickly
O Additional safety lane for emergency boats marked on Lake
Minnetonka near Big Island
• Medina — 1400 block of Willow Drive had culvert enlarged to
eliminate flooding in the spring and during heavy rains
S. RECOMMENDATION
The cities of the Lake Minnetonka planning group should
incorporate mitigation into other planning or policy-making
efforts such as zoning changes or building codes whenever
possible.
1
is
TT\V T-TovaM Riclr_VillnPrrnhility 4ecoaamont jinn
• ' ' Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
F. Section 4 - North Suburban
The fourth sector, or the North Suburban sector consists of Brooklyn
Center, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Crystal, Maple Grove, Medicine Lake,
New Hope, Plymouth, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony, Golden Valley, and
Osseo. The approximate population for Sector 4 is 321,453.
4-
tY.• F
° J U
.gip 7vr��% a h 9 11 L v AV
-
m-' .w
16
n-\V W... I R;c1r_Vnlnarah;l;tv A.......t d-
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
1. i Risks
i 14 i Lltxltbr Ott,w i
14 Tornado
i 14 i Fie a€€ecLc€act i
13 Terrorist act
13
12 Workplace Violence,
iz Wiinds:orm
12 Transportation accident
12 Telephone outage
12 Ice Storm
12 Heavy rain/flash flood
12 Hacker,virus attack
12 Explosion
12 Bomb actual
12 Blizzard
11 Utility Damage
11 I Severe cold
11 Hailstorm
11 I Computer outage
11 i Bomb threat i
10 Terrorist threat
i 10 i Sevem heat. i
10 Civil unrest/protest
i 9 'Read ctSw—Wac-cess issie i
9 HVAC outage
17ients i
9 Air Pollution
8 iRdfiire
8 Pandemic/epidemic
8 Drought
7 Strikes
7 Flood
6 Dam failure
5 Landslide
20-17 Very High 16-13 High
12-9 Medium 8-5 Low
4-0 Very Low
17
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
2. Vulnerabilities
® Transportation routes
• Freeways
• Pipelines
o Railroads
• Severe weather
• Tornados — example: Maple Grove 1939, 1965, 1987
■ Area is far more developed now,
• Slab on grade construction common (no shelter)
• Straight line winds — example: Champlin 1987
• Flooding
• Urban
• Riverine
• Land locked lake
• 302 facilities (92) — see map
• Other sensitive industries
o Defense contractors
o Medical technology companies
• Repetitive loss structures
o Golden Valley (8)
o Medicine Lake (1)
• New Hope (1)
• Plymouth (1)
• Other repetitive damage areas:
• Hwy 55 & General Mills— flooding of roadway
• Bassett Creek— flooding of homes
• Champlin — flooding of homes along Mississippi,
caused at times by ice jams at the Coon Rapids dam
• St Anthony= Silver Lake Road and St. Anthony Blvd
street flooding
• Osseo — flooding of basements during heavy rain in
area of 1st Ave NW south to Hwy 81
• Vulnerable populations
o Elderly, impaired
■ Concentrated in senior housing or assisted
living
1s
TIAV N.—A Ridr_V„In hility 4caa+c—t Ai
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
® Possibility of rapid spread of disease
o Immigrant population
• Tuberculosis in recent immigrants
• Difficulty communicating emergency
information to non-English speaking
populations
o Schools
• Located near pipelines and freeways
• Vulnerable and possibly volatile population
3. Mitigation Opportunities
• Provide shelter or safe rooms for developments with slab on
grade construction
• Advocate wind resistant construction
• Plan, train, and exercise with schools
• Move utilities underground to avoid outages during ice
storms and summer storms
• Purchase generators for critical facilities during power
outages
• Encouragement of use of NOAA weather radios — require in
new developments
• Formalize action to take on repetitive loss areas listed
• Remove or rehabilitate repetitive loss structures
4. Current/Completed Projects
• Vulnerable populations
• Halls sprinkled and smoke detectors placed in senior
housing and schools
• Nine fire,drills held in each school during the school
year
• ECHO (Emergency and Community Health Outreach)
will provide emergency information to non-English
speaking populations
® Planning and training with school districts
• Land locked_lake being pumped — Mooney Lake
• St Anthony— Fordham & 39"' — holding ponds built
S. RECOMMENDATION
The cities of the North Suburban planning area should
incorporate mitigation into other planning or policy-making
19
n-%V 14.,arvi A.0 m-t A-
' Hennepin County Hazard mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
efforts such as building codes or zoning changes whenever
possible.
20
T')AV T-T.—i Ric4.Vi,I—W);ty A.a.--t A-
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
G. Sector 5 — Northwest
The fifth sector, or the Northwest Sector, includes the cities of
Corcoran, Dayton, Rogers, portions of Hanover, Rockford, and the
township of Hassen. The approximate population for Sector 5 is
16,843.
�a
i a:7kn.
�� i _•'� s'�� rid�:'Uen.?��� •?1�����k����� �� � •d �tY. }rs39� .:�+' .eLfia
x:
r -
t 'T as
21
T)AV T-T.—A Rie4_Vii,—hi,ity A..---t A--
Hennepin County Hazard mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
1■ risks
-
15 Terrorist act
15
Telephone outage
14 ! Haz materials spills !
14 Fire affects facility
14 ' Computer outage
13 Utility outage
13 ! Transportation accident
F 13 Tomado
13 Terrorist threat
I i3 P.Cad cl^$4re/xcess!$$L'e
13 Ice Storm
13 H`JAC outage !
13 Hacker,virus attack
13 Explosion !
13 Bomb threat
13 ` Blizzard
I 12 I iii orkplace v-Sv�V°.
12 Windstorm
i2 ! Severe cold
12 Heavy Rain/flash flood
I r
12 Hailstorm
12 I Civic events
12 Bomb actual
i 11 i Severe heat
10 Utility damage
r 10 ! Flood
10 Drought _
----------10-----------T-------------- Air P01,1UU01 I --------i
9 Wildfire
r—-- —-- j --------T --- — Pa t idemi c e ideniic --------—�
8 Civil unrest/�rotest
�--- -------o--------- ----------- Strikes ----------�
6 Landslide
4 j Dam failure j
20-17 Very High 16-13 High
12-9 Medium 8-5 Low
4-0 Very Low
22
T)-\V W.—ARicl_ViilnorahilityAaaneomont`—
Hennepin County hazard Mitigation Risk/Vulnerability
2. Vulnerabilities
• Extremely fast population growth
• Vulnerable population
• Elderly, impaired
■ Concentrated in senior housing or assisted
living
■ Possibility of rapid spread of disease
G 500 bed dementia unit coming in Rogers
• Immigrant population
• Tuberculosis in recent immigrants
• Difficulty communicating emergency
information to non-English speaking
populations
• 302 facilities (5) — see map
• Motel fifty feet from a cyanide using industry
• Anhydrous ammonia tank farm across road from
mobile home park
• Ammonia leaks when stolen for meth lab use
• Utilities
• Amoco pipeline
• Transmission lines in Corcoran
• Substation in Hassan
• Severe weather
• No severe tornados since 1912
• Shelter— Rogers has 290 new housing units with no
basements
• Mobile home park in Dayton has inadequate shelter
• Transportation
• Freeways
• Railroads
• Flooding
• Mississippi — affects Dayton
• Crow — affects Dayton and Hassan
• Repetitive road flooding in Hassan and Greenfield
• Community gatherings/special events
• Hennepin County Fair.
• Hamel Rodeo
23
r)AV u.-, A R;.4_v„v,P..h;rn,A ac.+co.rw.r 8—
Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Disk/Vulnerability
• Repetitive loss structures (as defined by the NFIP)
o Dayton (1)
3. Mitigation Opportunities
A Plan, train, and exercise with dementia unit and senior
housing
• Document and formalize procedures for special events
Encourage developers to provide either safe rooms in each
residence or a shelter for the neighborhood
Buy out Mollen residence on County Road 144
O Look at ways to reduce flood damage to roads in Hassan
and Greenfield
9 Berm or buy out 5-house area on Mississippi in Dayton
Remove or rehabilitate repetitive loss structure
• Advocate wind resistant construction and retrofit
4. Current/Completed (Projects
• Vulnerable populations
o Halls sprinkled and smoke detectors placed in senior
housing and schools
o ECHO (Emergency and Community Health Outreach)
will provide emergency information to non-English
speaking populations
Preliminary work has been done on the buyout of the Mollen
properly
• Mallard South housing development is starting to put
basements in units because of market demand
Some commercial buildings in Rogers have safe rooms,
especially large span buildings made of metal
S. RECOMMENDA77ON
The Northwest Planning Group should incorporate mitigation
into other planning or policy-making efforts such as building
codes or zoning ordinances whenever possible.
24
T'WAV T-T....A Riclr_Vilnornhility Accaccmrnt r1M.
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW SHEETS
FF,MA (Region 5
State: Minnesota
Community/jurisdiction name(s): Hennepin County(includes Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park Champlin
Corcoran, Crystal, DaZon, Deephaven, Eden Prairie, Edina, Excelsior, Golden Valley Greenfield Greenwood Hanover Hassan
Township, Hopkins, Independence, Lone Lake, Loretto, Maple Grove, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake Medina Minneapolis Minnetonka
Beach Minnetonka, Minnetrista Mound New Hoe Orono Osseo Plymouth, Richfield Robbinsdale Rockford Shorewood Spring
Park, St Anthony, St Bonifacius, St Louis Park, Tonka Bay, Wayzata, Woodland Minneapolis/St Paul International airport, Fort
Snelling (unorganized)
Date sheets completed by community: January 8, 2003
Local community and State instructions:
Containing the specific criteria of FEMA's local mitigation planning regulation, these review sheets are intended to provide an
outline for meeting FEMA's planning process and documentation requirements. Communities can expedite the State/FEMA
plan review process by filling in the"Cbrresponding Plan Section" boxes with section or page numbers before submitting
- plans for State/FEMA review. The other bo)(es/columns should be reserved for State/FEMA review. Note that official FEMA
review of local mitigation plans occurs after adoption and participation prerequisites are met. We recommend inserting text
(such as section or page numbers) electronically. To do this when viewing in Microsoft Word 2000,just click on a shaded box
and start typing.
State reviewer instructions:
State reviewers should complete the remaining boxes on these review sheets, then sign and date at the end. To check a box
electronically, double-click on box and choose"checked"for default value. All criteria beyond the prerequisites, except
"Additional State Requirements," must receive a score of"Satisfactory" or"Outstanding" for the plan to receive FEMA
approval. A less than "Satisfactory" score on Additional State Requirement subsections may preclude a plan from passing at
the State level and being forwarded to FEMA. Reviewer's comments must be provided for criteria receiving "Unsatisfactory"
or"Needs Improvement" scores.
SCORING SYSTEM
Please check one of the following for each plan requirement.
U—Unsatisfactory: The plan does not address the criteria. Reviewers comments must be provided.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Sheets FEMA-R5,4103 Page 1 of 8
N— Needs Improvement: The plan addresses the criteria, Out needs significant improvement. Reviewer's comments must
be provided.
S—Satisfactory: the plan meets the minimum criteria. Reviewer's comments are encouraged, but not required.
O—Outstanding: The plan exceeds the minimum criteria. Reviewer's comments are encouraged, but not required.
Corresponding NOT
3.1 Prerequisites Plan sections) MET MET Reviewer Comments
3.1.1 Adoption by the Local Planning
Governing Body: Process II F,
The local hazard mitigation plan shall page 4
include documentation that the plan has ❑ ❑
been formally adopted by the governing
body of the ju6s'diction requesting
approval of the plan (e.g., City Council,
County Commissioners, Tribal Council).
3.1.2 Multi jurisdictional Plan Planning
Adoption: For multijurisdictioRal pla s, Process II F,
each jurisdiction requesting approval of page 4 ❑ ❑
the plan must document that it Ilas been
formally adopted.
3.1.3 Multi jurisdictional Planning
Participation: Multi jurisdictional plans Process II B,
(e.g., watershed plans) may be Accepted, page 1
as appropriate, as long as each. ❑ ❑
jurisdiction has participated in toe
process. State-wide plans will riot be
accepted as multi jurisdictional plans.
3.2 Planning Process Corresponding
Plan.$ection(s) U N S O Reviewer Comments
3.2.1 An open public involvement. Planning
process is essential to the development Process II C ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
of an effective plan. In orderto'develop a & G
more comprehensive approach to
Local Mitigation Plan Review Sheets—FEMA-R5,4/03 Page 2 of 8
reducing the effects of natural disaster$,
the planning process shall include an
opportunity for the public to comment on
the plan during the drafting stage and
prior to plan approvel.
3.2.2 The planning process shall include Planr'ing
an opportunity for neighbpring Process II E
communities, local and regional page 4
agencies involved in hazard mitibation
activities, and agencies thot have the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
authority to regulate deveippment, as well
as businesses, academia end other
private and non-profit interests to be
involved in the plannting process.
Community
3.x.3 The planning process shall include Profile III,
review and incorporation, if appropriate, page 1.
of exIsting plans, studies reports and Hazard Risk E] ❑ El El
information. Vulnerability
V, pages 5,
10, 15, 19, 24
3.2.4 [documentation: The plan shall Planning
include documentatibn of the planning Process II C
process used#o develop the plah, E] 11 11 El including how�was prepared, who was
involved in the procass, and how the
public was involved.
3. Risk Assessment Corresponding U N S O
.Plan sections) Reviewer Commente
The plan shall include a risk assessment Hazard Risk
that provides the factual besis fair Vulnerability
activities proposed in the strategy to V B. 11 El 11 El reduce losses from identified hazards.
Local risk assessments mpst pr6vide
sufficient information to enable the
Local Mitigation Plan Review Sheets-FEMXR5,4/03 Page 3 of 8
jurisdiction to identify and prioritize
appropriate mitigation actions to reduce _-
losses from identified hazards.
3.3.1 Identifying Hazards: The risk Hazards VI,
assessment shall include a description of B & L
the type, location, and extent of all natural
hazards that can affect the jurisdiction,
Per reviewer
comments—
local
perspective
on hazards'
Hazards V
A pages 4-5
3.3,2 Profiling Hazard Events: The B Pages 4-6
risk assessment shall include information C page 6
on previous occurrences of hazard events D pages 3-4
and probability of future events. The risk E pages 4-6
assessment shall include a description of G pages 5-8 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the H Pages 7-9
hazards and an overall summary of each I pages 7-8
hazard and its impact on the community. J Pages 4-5
K pages 8-tl
L page 4
M page
N page 4
O P a g es 7-0
P ge a s 6-8
p
Q pages 10-
11
3.3,3 Assessing Vulnerability Maps—302
Identifying Assets: The plan should facilities
describe vulnerability in terms of the V Hazard ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
types and numbers of existing and future Risk-Vulner.
buildings, infrastructure, and critical Page 1,pages
facilities located in the identified hazard 4-6. 8-9. 13-.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Sheets—FEMA-R5,4103 Page 4 of 8
areas. 14, 17';18,
22-23
3.3.4 Assessing Vulnerability` V Hazard
Estimating Potential Losses: The plan Risk Vulner
should describe vulnerability in terms of page 1-2,
an estimate of the potiential dollar losses Executive El El El ❑
to vulnerable structures identified, and a Summary
description of the methodology used to page 2
prepare the estimate.
Executive
Summary
3.3,5 Assessing Vulnerability— page 1-2 V
Analyzing Development Trends: The Hazard Risk-
plan should describe vulnerability in terms Vulner.
of providing a general description of land Page 1,pages ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
uses and development trends within the 4-6, 8-9, 13-
community so that mitigation options can 14, 17-18,
be considered in future land use 22-23,
decisions. Community
Profile page
16
3.3.6 Multi jurisdictional Risk V Hazard
Assessment: For multi jurisdictional Risk'Vulner.
plans, the risk assessment section must Assessment ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
assess each jurisdiction's risks where
they vary from the risks facing the entire
planning area.
3.4 Mitigation Strategy corresponding Plan Section(s) U H S 0 Reviewer Comments
3.4,1 Local Hazard Mitigation Goals: VII Goals,
The plan shall include a mitigation Objectives,
strategy that provides the jurisdiction's Strategies, V ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
blueprint for reducing the potential losses Hazard Risk-
identified in the risk assessment, based Vulner.
on existing authorities, policies, proqrams Paqe 1,pages
Local Mitigation Plan Review Sheets—FEMA-115,4/03 Page 5 of 8
and resources, and its ability to expand 4-6, 8-9, 13-
on and improve these existing tools. This 14, 17-18,
section shall include a description of 22-23,
mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-
term vulnerabilities to the identified
hazards.
3.4.2 Identification and Analysis of VII Goals,
Mitigation Measures: The mitigation Objectives,
strategy shall include a section that Strategies
identifies and analyzes a comprehensive
range of specific mitigation actions and ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
projects being considered to reduce the
effects of each hazard, with particular
emphasis on new.and existing buildings
and infrastructure.
3.4.3 Implementation of Mitigation Planning
Measures: The mitigation strategy shall Process page
include an action plan describing how the 3-4, VII
actions identified will be prioritized, Goals,
implemented, and administered by the Objectives,
local jurisdiction. Prioritization shall Strategies ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
include a special emphasis on.the extent
to which benefits are maximized
according to a cost benefit review of the
proposed projects and their associated
costs.
VII Goals,
Objectives,
3.4.4 Multi jurisdictional Mitigation Strategies
Strategy: For multi jurisdictional plans, page 1, , V
there must be identifiable action items Hazard Risk- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
specific to the jurisdiction requesting Vulner.
FEMA approval or credit of the plan. Page 1,pages4-6,
8-9, 13-14,
17-18, 22-23
Local Mitigation Plan Review Sheets—FEMA-R5,4103 Page 6 of 8
3.5 Plain Maintenance Procedures Ccrresponding U III Reviewer Comments
Plan Sedion(s)
3.5.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and II Planning
Updating the Plan: The plat shall Process page
include a plan maintenance process with 5
a section d escribing tho method an d ] ] ]
schedule of monitoring, evaluating, and
updating the mitigation plan within a five-
year --ycle.
3.5.2 Implementation Thn)ugh II Planning
Existing Programs: The plan Process page
maintenance pro:ess ;,hall include a 4
process by which local governments
incorporate the requirelients of the ] ] ]
mitigation plan into other planning
mechanisms such as comprehensive or
capital improvement plans, when
appropriate.
3.5.3 Continued PuNic kirolvement: II Planning
The plan maintenance process shall Process
include discussion on how the community pages 1-4 ] ] ] ]
will Gmtinue public par:icipat on in-the
plan maintenancea process.
CaiT@spArit�rng
3,f Additit�n��l Stal a RetNttl�ei��etrts - P�:���seat�on(s) U !J a t lt+�vietver Ca��rlrltEnts
6 1 jlilser#
00 9
6 2 jln�erk Stt�ke Regoi oh' :ntj
Local MHgation Ilan Review Shcets—FE:MA-R5. 4/03 Page 7 c f 8
t
ADDITIONAL REVIEWER COMMMENTS •
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN APPROVAL STATUS State FEMA►
Approved. Date: Approved. Date:
Not approved. Date: Not approved. Date:
STATE REVIEWER,
[Insert name above and sign to the right]
FEMA REVIEWER,
[Insert name above and sign to the right]
Local Mitigation Plan Review Sheets—FEMA-R5,4103 Page 8 of 8
WSB = B I OC N�.
a euocla a.!nc
Phase I,39th Avenue Reconstruction,Storm Sewer
Project Name:Watermain,Sanitary Sewer&Appurtenant Work Project No.:01065-85
Client: St Anthony Village 1 hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.
Bid Opening:April 20,2004 at 10:00 am Engineer: Todd E.Humber,P.E., Project Manager
,'"""- 'DENOTES CORRECTED FIGURE Engineers Bidder No.1 Bidder No.2 Bidder No.3
Opinion of Cost Veit&Company,Inc. Northdale Construction Barbarossa&Sons,Inc.
Item
Num I Mat.No. Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
SCHEDULE A-SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION(5%) LUMP SUM 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $16,864.09 $16,864.09 $16,500.00 $16,500.00 $25,800.00 $25,800.00
2 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 975 $5.00 $4,875.00 $4.60 $4,485.00 $2.75 $2,681.25 $4.00 $3,900.00
3 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SO FT 1000 $1.50 $1,500.00 $0.60 $600.00 $0.65 $650.00 $1.00 $1,000.00
4 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SO FT 12690 $3.00 $38,070.00 $0.50 $6,345.00 $1.17 $14,847.30 $0.85 $10,786.50
5 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 2370 $2.25 $5,332.50 $0.70 $1,659.00 $2.75 $6,517.50 $3.00 $7,110.00
6 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN SQ FT 400 $2.00 $800.00 $0.40 $160.00 $1.00 $400.00 $2.00 $800.00
7 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 90 $4.50 $405.00 $1.60 $144.00 $4.50 $405.00 $3.00 $270.00
8 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT(FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 140 $4.50 $630.00 $3.00 $420.00 $7.50 $1,050.00 $4.00 $560.00
9 2105.507 SU13GRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 250 $6.00 $1,500.00 $1.50 $375.00 $3.50 $875.00 $7.00 $1,750.00
10 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW(CV)(P) CU YD 170 $13.00 $2,210.00 $12.00 $2,040.00 $18.75 $3,187.50 $17.00 $2,890.00
11 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V SO YD 500 $1.75 $875.00 $0.45 $225.00 $1.15 $575.00 $2.15 $1,075.00
12 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5(100%CRUSHED) TON 575 $15.00 $8,625.00 $17.00 $9,775.00 $18.50 $10,637.50 $13.00 $7,475.00
13 2340.508 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 95 $36.00 $3,420.00 $63.00 $5,985.00 $66.00 $6,270.00 $60.00 $5,700.00
14 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 25 $2.50 $62.50 $5.00 $125.00 $5.50 $137.50 $5.00 $125.00
15 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 170 $15.00 $2,550.00 $15.75 $2,677.50 $23.50 $3,995.00 $15.00 $2,550.00
16 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00
17 2573.502 SILT FENCE,TYPE HEAVY DUTY(ORANGE) LIN FT 100 $4.50 $450.00 $1.50 $150.00 $3.50 $350.00 $5.00 $500.00
18 2575.505 SODDING,TYPE LAWN(INCL.TOPSOIL&FERT.) SO YD 95 $4.00 $380.00 $6.00 $570.00 $6.50 $617.50 $10.00 $950.00
19 2573.602 INLET PROTECTION EACH 3 $75.00 $225.00 $110.00 $330.00 $125.00 $375.00 $450.00 $1,350.00
20 2565.602 PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6X15' EACH 1 2 $125.00 $250.00 $756.00 $1,512.00 $1,925.00 $3,850.00 $1,300.00 $2,600.00
21 2565.602 PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X6' EACH 2 $100.00 $200.00 $630.00 $1,260.00 $1,375.00 $2,750.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
TOTAL SCHEDULE A-SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $108,360.00 1 $57,101.59 $78,671.05 $80,491.50
SCHEDULE B-SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
22 2104.603 ABANDON PIPE SEWER LIN FT 490 $6.00 $2,940.00 $1.50 $735.00 $3.50 $1,715.00 $8.00 $3,920.00
23 2104.525 ABANDON MANHOLE EACH 3 $300.00 $900.00 $380.00 $1,140.00 $550.00 $1,650.00 $500.007 $1,500.00
24 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE(SANITARY) EACH 2 $250.00 $500.00 $425.00 $850.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $400.00 $800.00
Page 1 of 8 F.IWPWIM1065-851,Exce111 0 6 5-8 5 Bid TabulationBid Tab
WSB
Phase I,39th Avenue Reconstruction,Storm Sewer
Project Name:Waterrnain,Sanitary Sewer&Appurtenant Work Project No.:01065-85
Client: St Anthony Village I hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.
Bid Opening:April 20,2004 at 10:00 am Engineer: Todd E. Humber, P.E., Project Manager
DENOTES CORRECTED FIGURE Engineer's Bidder No.1 Bidder No.2 Bidder No.3
Opinion of Cost Veit S Company,Inc. Northdale Construction Barbarossa&Sons,Inc.
Item
Num Mat.No. Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
25 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE(SANITARY) LIN FT 150 $6.00 $900.00 $15.00 $2,250.00 $4.50 $675.00 $6.00 $900.00
26 2451.601 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING CU YD 525 $20.00 $10,500.00 $2.00 $1,050.00 $0.01 $5.25 $13.00 $6,825.00
27 2503.523 SALVAGE CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 2 $75.00 $150.00 $75.00 $150.00 $100.00 $200.00 $85.00 $170.00
28 2503.601 SANITARY SEWER BYPASS PUMPING LUMP SUM 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,850.00 $1,850.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
29 2503.603 CLEAN PIPE SEWER LIN FT 966 $1.50 $1,449.00 $1.30 $1,255.80 $1.06 $1,023.96 $0.96 $927.36
30 2503.603 HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE(HOPE)PIPE LIN FT 374 $100.00 $37.400.00 $145.00 $54,230.00 $121.90 $45,590.60 $110.00 $41,140.00
(DIRECTIONAL BORED)
31 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 4 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $565.00 $2,260.00 $3,125.00 $12,500.00 $2,100.00 $8,400.00
32 2503.603 8"OUTSIDE DROP LIN FT 35.34 $275.00 $9,718.50 $190.00 $6,714.60 $145.00 $5,124.30 $160.00 $5,654.40
33 2503.602 6"PVC SEWER RISER EACH 6 $100.00 $600.00 $82.00 $492.00 $162.00 $972.00 $20.00 $120.00
34 2503.602 10"X6"PVC WYE EACH 6 $175.00 $1,050.00 $130.00 $780.00 $137.24 $823.44 $130.00 $780.00
35 2503.603 6"PVC PIPE SEWER,SDR 26 LIN FT 300 $18.00 $5,400.00 $21.00 $6,300.00 $18.34 $5,502.00 $20.00 $6,000.00
36 2503.603 8"PVC PIPE SEWER,SDR 26 LIN FT 293 $25.00 $7,325.00 $29.00 $8,497.00 $50.62 $14,831.66 $56.00 $16,408.00
37 2503.603 8"PVC PIPE SEWER,SDR 35 LIN FT 197 $21.00 $4,137.00 $22.00 $4,334.00 $25.00 $4,925.00 $35.00 $6,895.00
38 2503.603 10"PVC PIPE SEWER,SDR 26 LIN FT 843 $30.00 $25,290.00 $29.00 $24,447.00 $72.35 $60,991.05 $60.00 $50,580.00
39 2503.602 CHIMNEY SEALS EACH 4 $250.00 $1,000.00 $210.00 $840.00 $208.12 $832.48 $170.00 $680.00
40 2503.603 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER LIN FT 1649 $1.00 $1,649.00 $0.60 $989.40 $0.68 $1,121.32 $0.62 $1,022.38
41 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 2 $400.00 $800.00 $230.00 $460.00 $338.00 $676.00 $300.00 $600.00
42 2506.603 CONST 48"DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE LIN FT 276.79 $200.00 $55,358.00 $106.00 $29,339.74 $134.50 $37,228.26 $142.00 $39,304.18
ITOTAL SCHEDULE B-SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $186,866.50 $149,614.5411 $199,737.32 $217,626.32
SCHEDULE C-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
43 2104.501 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 570 $5.25 $2,992.50 $4.00 $2,280.00 $5.50 $3.135.00 $6.00 $3,420.00
44 2104.509 REMOVE VALVE&BOX EACH 3 $150.00 $450.00 $190.00 $570.00 $100.00 $300.00 $100.00 $300.00
45 2104.523 SALVAGE HYDRANT&VALVE EACH 1 $425.00 $425.00 $565.00 $565.00 $450.00 $450.00 $500.00 $500.00
46 2504.601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LUMP SUM 1 $5.000.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
47 1 2504.604 4"POLYSTYRENE INSULATION SQ YD 15 11 $26.00 $390.00 $13.00 $195.00 $22.68 $340.20 $18.00 $270.00
48 2451.602 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING TON 600 $20.00 $12,000.00 $3.30 $1,980.00 $0.01 $6.00 $10.00 $6,000.00
49 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $895.00 $2,685.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,400.00 $4,200.00
Page 2 of 8 F.IWPWIM1065-851Exce111065.85 Bid Tabulation Bid Tab
A
WSB
n- Phase I,39th Avenue Reconstruction,Storm Sewer
Project Name:Waterrnain,Sanitary Sewer&Appurtenant Work Project No.:01065-85
Client: St Anthony Village I hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.
Bid Opening:April 20,2004 at 10:00 am Engineer. Todd E.Humber, P.E., Project Manager
FK-;4:N DENOTES CORRECTED FIGURE Engineer's Bidder No.1 Bidder No.2 Bidder No.3
Opinion of Cost Veit&Company,Inc. Northdale Construction Barbarossa&Sons,Inc.
Item
Num Mal No. Units City Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
50 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH 3 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,100.00 $6,300.00 $1,788.79 $5,366.37 $2,200.00 $6,600.00
51 2504.602 6"GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 5 $650.00 $3,250.00 $756.00 $3,780.00 $535.54 $2,677.70 $600.00 $3,000.00
52 2504.602 8"GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 7 $800.00 $5,600.00 $944.00 $6,608.00 $707.27 $4,950.89 $800.00 $5.600.00
53 2504.602 10"GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 7 $1,100.00 $7,700.00 $1,231.00 $8,617.00 $1,035.67 $7,249.69 $1,000.00 $7,000.00
54 2504.603 6"WATER MAIN,D.I.P.,CL 52 W/POLY WRAP LIN FT 125 $28.00 $3,500.00 $16.80 $2,100.00 $22.83 $2,853.75 $22.00 $2,750.00
55 2504.603 8"WATER MAIN,D.I.P.,CL 52 W/POLY WRAP LIN FT 360 $31.00 $11,160.00 $21.60 $7,776.00 $28.01 $9,363.60 $26.00 $9,360.00
56 2504.603 10"WATER MAIN,D.I.P.,CL 52 W/POLY WRAP LIN FT 1420 $34.00 $48,280.00 $26.00 $36,920.00 $25.08 $35,613.60 $29.00 $41,180.00
57 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND 6900 $2.50 $17,250.00 $1.00 $6,900.00 $1.83 $12,627.00 $1.75 $12,075.00
TOTAL SCHEDULE C-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1 $126,997.50 $88,276.00 1 $89,433.80 $105,755.00
SCHEDULE D-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
58 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE IV SO YD 62 $3.00 $186.00 $1.50 $93.00 $2.50 $155.00 $3.00 $186.00
59 2451.602 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING TON 830 $20.00 $16,600.00 $1.00 $830.00 $0.01 $8.30 $10.00 $8,300.00
60 2503.541 15"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 332 $30.00 $9,960.00 $21.00 $6.972.00 $28.29 $9,392.28 $28.00 $9,296.00
61 2503.541 21"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 247 $34.00 $8,398.00 $27.00 $6.669.00 $31.24 $7,716.28 $32.00 $7,904.00
62 2503.541 24"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 87 $36.00 $3,132.00 $28.00 $2,436.00 $33.35 $2,901.45 $36.00 $3,132.00
63 2503.541 27"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 182 $44.00 $8,008.00 $36.50 $6,643.00 $40.44 $7,360.08 $43.00 $7,826.00
64 2503.541 30"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 291 $46.00 $13,386.00 $43.00 $12,513.00 $45.07 $13,115.37 $48.00 $13,968.00
65 2503.541 33"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 176 $52.00 $9,256.00 $54.00 $9,612.00 $51.94 $9,245.32 $55.00 $9,790.00
66 2573.51 RISER STANDPIPE EACH 12 $150.00 $1,800.00 $353.00 $4,236.00 $175.00 $2,100.00 $96.00 $1,152.00
67 2575.513 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 9 CU YD 17 $18.00 $306.00 $33.00 $561.00 $23.50 $399.50 $25.00 $425.00
68 2503.541 60"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 63 $140.00 $8,820.00 $130.00 $8,190.00 $165.55 $10,429.65 $136.00 $8,568.00
69 2503.603 8"PVC PIPE SEWER,SDR 35 LIN FT 225 $21.00 $4,725.00 $10.60 $2,385.00 $19.85 $4,466.25 $20.00 $4,500.00
70 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48- LIN FT 47.1 $275.00 $12,952.50 $221.00 $10,409.10 $153.00 $7,206.30 $250.00 $11,775.00
4020
71 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 54- LIN FT 30.58 $300.00 $9,174.00 $373.00 $11,406.34 $199.00 $6,085.42 $290.00 $8,868.20
4020
72 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 102- LIN FT 9.19 $600.00 $5,514.00 $897.00 $8,243.43 $888.00 $8,160.72 $750.00 $6,892.50
4020
73 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN H LIN FT 22.68 $225.00 $5,103.00 $250.00 $5,670.00 $233.00 $5,284.44 $230.00 $5,216.40
Page 3 of 8 F:IWPW1M1065-851ExceA1065-85 Bid TabulationBid Tab
WSB i IRA
TA
Phase I,39th Avenue Reconstruction,Storm Sewer
Project Name:Watermain,Sanitary Sewer&Appurtenant Work Project No.:01065-85
Client: St Anthony Village /hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.
Bid Opening:April 20,2004 at 10:00 am Engineer: Todd E. Humber, P.E., Project Manager
DENOTES CORRECTED FIGURE Engineers Bidder No.1 Bidder No.2 Bidder No.3
Opinion of Cost Veit&Company,Inc. Northdale Construction Barbarossa&Sons,Inc.
Item
Num Mat.No. Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
74 2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS IV CU YD 38.5 $65.00 $2,502.50 $88.00 $3,388.00 $93.50 $3,599.75 $65.00 $2,502.50
75 2501.515 30"RC PIPE APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $1,294.00 $1,294.00 $1,269.16 $1,269.16 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
76 2501.515 60"RC PIPE APRON EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,116.00 $1,116.00 $1,906.94 $1,906.94 $1,400.00 $1,400.00
F77 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 60"PIPE APRON EACH 1 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $2,340.00 $2,340.00 $1,612.44 $1,612.44 $1,600.00 $1,600.00
TOTAL SCHEDULE D-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $125,723.00 $105,006.87 $102,414.65 $114,501.60
TOTAL SCHEDULE A-SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS: $108,360.00 $57,101.59 $78,671.05 $80.491.50
TOTAL SCHEDULE B-SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $186,866.50 $149,614.54 $199,737.32 $217,626.32
TOTAL SCHEDULE C-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS: $126,997.50 $88,276.00 $89,433.80 $105,755.00
OTAL SCHEDULE D-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $125,723.00 $105,006.87 $102,414.65 $114,501.60
GRAND TOTAL $547,947.00 $399,999.00 $470,256.82 $518,374.42
Page 4 of 8 F:IWPWIM1065-851Exce111065-85 Bid TabulationBid Tab
H SB B� Q D X41-L
Phase I,39th Avenue Reconstruction,Storm Sewer
Project Name:Watermain,Sanitary Sewer&Appurtenant Work Project No.:01065-85
Client: St Anthony Village I hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.
Bid Opening:April 20,2004 at 10:00 am Engineer: Todd E.Humber,P.E., Project Manager
'' jA DENOTES CORRECTED FIGURE Engineers Bidder No.4
Opinion of Cost Three Rivers Const.
Item
Num I Mat.No. Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
SCHEDULE A-SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION(5%) LUMP SUM 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $6,570.00 $6,570.00
2 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 975 $5.00 $4,875.00 $5.00 $4,875.00
3 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SO FT 1000 $1.50 $1,500.00 $0.25 $250.00
4 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SO FT 12690 $3.00 $38,070.00 $0.25 $3,172.50
5 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SO YD 2370 $2.25 $5,332.50 $2.29 $5,427.30
6 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN SO FT 400 $2.00 $800.00 $0.25 $100.00
7 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 90 $4.50 $405.00 $5.15 $463.50
8 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT(FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 140 $4.50 $630.00 $5.15 $721.00
9 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 250 $6.00 $1,500.00 $7.06 $1,765.00
10 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW(CV)(P) CU YD 170 $13.00 $2,210.00 $23.39 $3,976.30
11 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V SO YD 500 $1.75 $875.00 $2.18 $1,090.00
12 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5(100%CRUSHED) TON 575 $15.00 $8,625.00 $14.31 $8,228.25
13 2340.508 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 95 $36.00 $3,420.00 $61.80 $5,871.00
14 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 25 $2.50 $62.50 $5.15 $128.75
15 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER DESIGN 8618 LIN FT 170 $15.00 $2,550.00 $20.60 $3,502.00
16 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,545.00 $1,545.00
17 2573.502 SILT FENCE,TYPE HEAVY DUTY(ORANGE) LIN FT 100 $4.50 $450.00 $5.15 $515.00
18 2575.505 SODDING,TYPE LAWN(INCL.TOPSOIL 8 FERT.) SO YD 95 $4.00 $380.00 $10.00 $950.00
19 2573.602 INLET PROTECTION EACH 3 $75.00 $225.00 $154.50 $463.50
20 2565.602 PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X15' EACH 2 $125.00 $250.00 $1,493.50 $2,987.00
21 2565.602 PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X6' EACH 2 $100.00 $200.00 $1,158.75 $2,317.50
TOTAL SCHEDULE A-SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $108,360.00 $54,918.60
SCHEDULE B-SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
22 2104.603 ABANDON PIPE SEWER LIN FT 490 $6.00 $2,940.00 $10.50 $5,145.00
23 2104.525 ABANDON MANHOLE EACH 3 $300.00 $900.00 $300.00 $900.00
24 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE(SANITARY) EACH 2 $250.00 $500.00 $300.00 $600.00
Page 5 of 8 F.'I WPMAA1085-851Exce/11065-85 Bid TabulationBid Tab
Phase 1,39th Avenue Reconstruction,Storm Sewer
Project Name:Watermain,Sanitary Sewer&Appurtenant Work Project No.:01065-85
Client: St Anthony Village I hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.
Bid Opening:April 20,2004 at 10:00 am Engineer: Todd E.Humber, P.E.,Project Manager
DENOTES CORRECTED FIGURE Engineers Bidder No.4
Opinion of Cost Three Rivers Const.
Item
Num Mat.No. Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
25 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE(SANITARY) LIN FT 150 $6.00 $900.00 $10.00 $1,500.00
26 2451.601 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING CU YD 525 $20.00 $10,500.00 $4.00 $2,100.00
27 2503.523 SALVAGE CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 2 $75.00 $150.00 $150.00 $300.00
28 2503.601 SANITARY SEWER BYPASS PUMPING LUMP SUM 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $22,302.50 $22,302.50
29 2503.603 CLEAN PIPE SEWER LIN FT 966 $1.50 $1,449.00 $1.00 $966.00
30 2503.603 HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE(HOPE)PIPE LIN FT 374 $100.00 $37,400.00 $107.00 $40,018.00
(DIRECTIONAL BORED)
31 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 4 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $9,277.50 $37,110.00
32 2503.603 8"OUTSIDE DROP LIN FT 35.34 $275.00 $9,718.50 $239.25 $8,455.10
r 34
2503.602 6°PVC SEWER RISER EACH 6 $100.00 $600.00 $127.81 $766.86
2503.602 10"X6'PVC WYE EACH 6 $175.00 $1,050.00 $132.10 $792.60
2503.603 6"PVC PIPE SEWER,SDR 26 LIN FT 300 $18.00 $5,400.00 $39.82 $11,946.00
2503.603 8"PVC PIPE SEWER,SDR 26 LIN FT 293 $25.00 $7,325.00 $81.60 $23,908.80
37 2503.603 8"PVC PIPE.SEWER,SDR 35 LIN FT 197 $21.00 $4,137.00 $70.53 $13,894.41
38 2503.603 10"PVC PIPE SEWER,SDR 26 LIN FT 843 $30.00 $25,290.00 $83.62 $70.491.66
39 2503.602 CHIMNEY SEALS EACH 4 $250.00 $1,000.00 $286.88 $1,147.52
40 2503.603 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER LIN FT 1649 $1.00 $1,649.00 $0.65 $1,071.85
41 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 2 $400.00 $800.00 $655.88 $1,311.76
42 2506.603 CONST 48'DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE LIN FT 276.79 $200.001 $55,358.00 $133.09 $36,837.98
IFOTAIL SCHEDULE B-SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $186,866.50 $281,566.04
SCHEDULE C-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
43 2104.501 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 570 $5.25 $2,992.50 $10.00 $5,700.00
44 2104.509 REMOVE VALVE&BOX EACH 3 $150.00 $450.00 $200.00 $600.00
45 2104.523 SALVAGE HYDRANT&VALVE EACH 1 $425.00 $425.00 $300.00 $300.00
46 2504:601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
47 .2504.604 4"POLYSTYRENE INSULATION SO YD 15 $26.00 $390.00 $17.62 $264.30
48 2451.602 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING TON 600 $20.00 $12,000.00 $4.00 $2,400.00
49 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $676.25 $2,028.75
Page 6 of 8 F:IWPWIM7065-851Exce111065-85 Bid TabulattonSid Tab
A
WSB ® p
Phase I,39th Avenue Reconstruction,Storrs Sewer
Project Name:Watermain,Sanitary Sewer&Appurtenant Work Project No.:01065-85
Client: St Anthony Village I hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.
Bid Opening:April 20,2004 at 10:00 am Engineer: Todd E. Humber, P.E., Project Manager
N J DENOTES CORRECTED FIGURE Engineers Bidder No.4
Opinion of Cost Three Rivers Const.
Item
Num Mat.No. Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
50 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH 3 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,779.24 $5,337.72
51 2504.602 6"GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 5 $650.00 $3,250.00 $747.84 $3,739.20
52 2504.602 8"GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 7 $800.00 $5,600.00 $951.68 $6,661.76
53 2504.602 10"GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 7 $1,100.00 $7,700.00 $1,249.54 $8,746.78
54 2504.603 6"WATER MAIN,D.I.P.,CL 52 W/POLY WRAP LIN FT 125 $28.00 $3,500.00 $31.57 $3,946.25
55 2504.603 8"WATER MAIN,D.I.P.,CL 52 W/POLY WRAP LIN FT 360 $31.00 $11,160.00 $35.02 $12,607.20
56 2504.603 10"WATER MAIN,D.I.P.,CL 52 W/POLY WRAP LIN FT 1420 $34.00 $48,280.00 $31.83 $45,198.60
57 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND 6900 $2.50 $17,250.00 $2.11 $14,559.00
ITOTAL SCHEDULE C-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS $126,997.50 $113,089.56
SCHEDULE D-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
58 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE IV SQ YD 62 $3.00 $186.00 $3.74 $231.88
59 2451.602 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING TON 630 $20.00 $16,600.00 $4.00 $3,320.00
60 2503.541 15'RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 332 $30.00 $9,960.00 $28.14 $9,342.48
61 2503.541 21"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 247 $34.00 $8,398.00 $32.22 $7,958.34
62 2503.541 24"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 87 $36.00 $3,132.00 $34.17 $2.972.79
63 2503.541 27"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 182 $44.00 $8,008.00 $41.50 $7,553.00
64 2503.541 30"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 291 $46.00 $13,386.00 $44.62 $12,984.42
65 2503.541 33"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 178 $52.00 $9,256.00 $51.41 $9,150.98
66 2573.51 RISER STANDPIPE EACH 12 $150.00 $1,800.00 $150.00 $1,800.00
67 2575.513 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 9 CU YD 17 $18.00 $306.00 $29.64 $503.88
68 2503.541 60"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 63 $140.00 $8,820.00 $129.42 $8,153.46
69 2503.603 8"PVC PIPE SEWER.SDR 35 LIN FT 225' $21.00 $4,725.00 $16.78 $3,775.50
70 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48- LIN FT 47.1 $275.00 $12,952.50 $245.69 $11,572.00
4020
71 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 54- LIN FT 30.58 $300.00 $9,174.00 $240.34 $7,349.60
4020
72 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 102 LIN FT 9.19 $600.00 $5,514.00 $741.67 $6,815.95
4020
73 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN H LIN FT 22.68 $225.00 $5,103.00 $290.30 $6,584.00
Page 7 of 8 F.IWPWIM1065-851Excel1f065-85 Bid TabulationBld Tab
B
a,u- Phase I,39th Avenue Reconstruction,Storm Sewer
Project Name:Watermain,Sanitary Sewer&Appurtenant Work Project No.:01065-85
Client: St Anthony Village I hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.
Bid Opening:April 20,2004 at 10:00 am Engineer: Todd E.Humber,P.E., Project Manager
DENOTES CORRECTED FIGURE Engineer's Bidder No.4
Opinion of Cost Three Rivers Const.
Item
Num Mat.No. Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
74 2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS IV CU YD 38.5 $65.00 $2,502.50 $76.35 $2,939.48
75 2501.515 30"RC PIPE APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $1,360.72 $1,360.72
76 2501.515 60"RC PIPE APRON EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,383.26 $1,383.26
77 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 60"PIPE APRON EACH 1 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $2,146.49 $2,146.49
TOTAL SCHEDULE D-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $125,723.00 $107,898.22
TOTAL SCHEDULE A-SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS: $108,360.00 $54,918.60
TOTAL SCHEDULE B-SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $186,866.50 $281,566.04
TOTAL SCHEDULE C-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS: $126,997.50 $113,089.56
OTAL SCHEDULE D-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $125,723.00 $107,898.22
IGRAND TOTAL $547,947.00 $557,472.42
Page 8 of 8 F.IWPWIM1065-851Exce111065-85 Bid TabulationBid Tab
1
�'v ��
���
\V`�
I
it
it
�I
i
.. Our Mission Career CCnicer
Firefighters
3 Shifts with 2 per shift providing 247x365 protection
l .
To Serve the Ciry of St. 26 Paid on-call Firefighters
/ _ j • We are all professionally trained in fire and EMS skills
Anthony-by�role,49 lives. 6 New Recruits in training
property andthefenvlronment 3 Engines
throe 'rl uai.lt �d excellence r k
ire-- Fife and.EMS services c P
OMMMV operate from our temp station and ho,e one engine
@ Public works
r,i)I}?I-�!l.11?i1f �il';ill'Jv'I'1C�tl� �
Fie a d. MS Coweiaoe �
�°`.Malntaui.Educancri"and Stata Certlflcations: ,� ° � ' ''` —
I Medical;Hazmat,Fire Tlalning, Instructor { � , = • a e
EquipnientlApparatus Maintenance and Upkezp I �'�, ,
• Business Inspections l8usinessPlePlatis�•.�b.,,;`•'• ^ � .:� +"� `J� I �., i:,- _ -�
• Housing Code Enforcem nt I� ISft `�t ''� .. �� - �� w�' - -�
r...Publlc Eaucatlom 1S21nlnarsllTemonsttations � � ,Il I g.w- ,�.,�' �} l"!',: ✓ � �?h�
•'[5aily''SYation Ni'aintenance ari"iA"Jp'"pkeep
Y
inam
Response Time 4 CPRIEMS Elevator FeS,
TRW
• Water Rescue Bldg Preplanning
• Live Fire Personal Protection
• Drivers Training AVVAIR
• Hazardous Materials Pumping
0 VOOD Foaln Ops
C, x .: �.Q a,,sf�fr
. t ,Rcsnonsc Tim,_ ?fined Sp �rz(hing
.T,au„ng Fitness
t ,
t }
Sigii icantrincidents - z
ox
ao6.
O x-y. {r7�1'3L
°•ff><< ;� m x�� ' n�may;` � oi�,d':;;, ��'�+4q➢►iOfa*fLfv^,-, o��b�d�¢aC"fi��v8�firC]e: s ; �=,'" ..�'r"2 ��`��:
4
Z § S
� b'SU0% 1 9r. p'j uP{,+�' ',e E J�Jr�r�riµ�r�r �l�lJrJ'�t.jtF
-
� :,.;'t�-.1 � J S.-�ct v+..vr`l-'t _ ,i�s��z � -. � 'T-, � C,. '�.' 2•v j b'
= a r `1G r -lri yrlr `Oil
{% 1. h. -+,,� ! r ;49'��!' �,. �!i• �s ` 0 '0 0
Movetl to Temporary Sif Ort
August 9;2003
o ry: y
Yom- ...
i
5
1 F
a o 0 o e 00
l @Vaguagmmgu@@.9�
9 F MAR., ° • c r e 1 pp
a
6
s 0. NTJi JcJ"il� a
,�fin. ,UnY „w� �...'f'-', :c;,,,t p `1^• S_ .� �w „� � `� r—
r rP d - 10 u Drat anal ad
r
e
{eb7un y 2t Yl1tla �
2004 Goals
af
7
Code
_ To each Firefighter
• To the Firefighter's Family � �
• To the City Council r� f
• City Manager
• The Citizens of St.Anthony �' — � r� �
„ = Thank You for the Privileyew�'f serving as ''
-your Fire Chief for the past Four Years