The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC PACKET 05111982 Meeting Sheet IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII 100469 Box: 16 Folder: CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987 Document: CC PACKET 05111982 �T CITY OF ST. ANTHONY COUNCIL AGENDA May 11, 1982 7 :30 P.M. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance. _ 1.30 / L-Br.� Roll Call. at, - 0_ A o _ . (2-rYl — V A roval of April 27, 1982 Council minutes .— Approval of May 4, 1982 Council Work Session minutes._ 4 _ , - Q4 �l1u�G-r►c�t.c..� 1p� Licenses/Permits/Petitions . J__1fApache Merchants Association-Carnival Ride Permit. presentation of Claims. yl_.____Verif ied Claims . ACTION: Recommend approval. �✓`^ equested Public Appearance - State Senator Neil Dieterich. �,,—Reports . Council Reports . Ua,e' Mayor Sundland -� 113 Councilman Marks Councilman Enrooth - Councilman Ranallo - Le� Councilman Letourneau L—.—.—Commissions/Departments/ ommittees . � 4,An--"Fire Department Mont ly Report-Apri"1, 1982. Equipment Exchange Program with Neighboring Cities. j.gwiAnnual Water Report-State Health Department.-//W Vel! Liquor Operation Sales Summary, January-April, 1982 . Lai City Manager. {__a�oltes on May 5 , 1982 Staff Meeting. L,Ja! Proposed Surface Water Management Plan. Status-Hennepin County Public Safety Radio Systems . Redistricting Update. ��,o - �,,,� rr� � - A.M.M. Annual Meeting and Elections . 5 �ublic Hearings . 7: 45 P.M. Amendment of Revenue Sharing Budget. dResolution 82-019 (Resolution transferring $9 ,000 from Special Police Fund to General Fund) . Resolution 82-020 (Resolution transferring $14 ,600 fro Revenue Sharing to General Fund) . �1'1a•��, - rum -2- :00 P.M. Anthony Lane North Assessment Hearing . - '�-,cam New Business . Summer Recreation Report by Tom McMullen. Sunset Memorial Park - St. Anthony Do levard Drid a Underpass/w e q u e s t. - J r-�2 e �-�-� ,� �-2 ' via • County Read "D" Project -'StorM Drainase Situation Update I . Unfini hell Dus in��-ss:- -- c _ C ✓ x� "- 1 _ A*�®rdinance 19P-004 , Relating to Water Rates - 3rd readi Ord'nance l�S2- 0 � tr• •se enca Or dinance - 2nd rea Consideration of Insur nc-e— -, _ ernhard treussner Parking Concerns . jam! roga Service Station . Craig Morris - Fence Completion.-- 7& 4 -- �- , Ad j ou rnmen t. CITY OF ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENV AUTHORITY AGENDA May 11, 1982 7 :00 P.M. A. Call to Order. B. Roll Call. C. Approval of April 13 , 1982 minutes . D. Items of Business . 1. Interview of Northwest Associated Consultants , Inc. Proposal • for Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Management Services . E. Adjournment. • • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES April 13 , 1982 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sundland at 8 : 50 P.M. Present for roll call : Marks , Ranallo, Sundland, Letourneau, and Enrooth. Also present: Dave Childs , City Manager. Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Marks to approve as submitted the minutes for the January 26 , 1982 HRA meeting . Motion carried unanimously. The second in a number of redevelopment management proposals for the Kenzie Terrace area was presented by James S . Holmes , James Lemly and Gary Winter, representing the Holmes and Graves law firm, 470 Pillsbury Center. The Council was brought up to date on the new • legislation which may make tax increment financing of the project more feasible and was especially interested in hearing how developers were found for other municipal projects such as the development of the area around 40th and Central in Columbia Heights . No action was taken. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to adjourn the meeting at 10 : 01 P .M. Motion carried unanimously . Respectfully submitted, Helen Crowe Secretary Mayor ATTEST: • City Clerk CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REOUEST' FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION •------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution May 6, 1982 Ordinance HRA Meeting Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title Redevelopment X Other Management Consultant May 11 , 1982 Informational Proposals ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Childs , City Manager -----.---------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF -SUBJECT: We are reviewing our third. and final proposa 1 for redevelopment management services. Because the proposals themselves take somewhat different procedural and phi'losophi.cal approaches to the process and have somewhat different cost proposals , I will take the next few days/weeks to prepare an analysis of the ,proposals which places them in a format which allows proper comparison and hopefully allow the Council to make a final decision. To do this, I expect to prepare a questionnaire to which the vendors can respond and be rated on an equitable basis. I will then make a final recommendation for you to accept, modify or reject. s FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : • A proposal to the t of St. Anthon y �r ............ . ... /}"iG:{•Y;;:•ti•{:•G$;,+.j}•ii:i?:i}:ii>Si i'r::'r:<i::i: i:. C n .............. ............ ................... . ......... . I: W/ .............. ...+J• ... ................... f {Yid:•+ ............... ............ ......................... : yyyyyy//////��. fort the 10 .......... ........ ... . ....... . 11 . ..... ... •}}Y p....... ......... ..... .. ........ at CiY•: :X ■ :$:vr:; iz r:: ::. ............... .. ......... .................... ........... ............- -....... ............................. ......... . .. ..... .................... ........................................... ..:.:................... l:C�:}S'.y:{:;::{}•.`•:�$:ti:$v?{:•:::}%{ty�$Y::{:;:ii:;�; iSi:{v$i??':i'i•:$ii:�iiiiF:}::$: :•,:�::}:?$`ti��f?iii:i:?{$:Vii::�i�i::�ij'r$j;{:iii'r:•`.�$$$T}i:':}$?'::{v:L�Tii$?�:��::4jii$i: {`vii:`v'r:%`vi$$ii:'?i::`i:}<�::'•. $nr... $$$L'4'v{'�:i�L:•$$)2vv:::::•:::::::::i$:%i$:ti<:}:}:}:.';:Cr} :'^:{ .......,:::•:,:•.v:..•..-:nv:.}}}v.;;:;::;.v:::::::::::•:.}v•.�.�:::.:v:.vyv:::::.�::::::v:::::w:.}}}:;t.y:::•:}:4}}}:•:}:{}?:•}}:4}}}}} ;.•v:v.+....•..:..:.::.+.:... '�f}r%$:•$:ti+�$:4$$$$:•}:�$;5::%}:{`<`:•,.�<:•r:C::•$L$:i�$$:{tii:�:?{:•,:::�.^;.;$:}: :::>':$i?'$frii$':?•`.:•i<:•:�:•:i�:y:{�$}:C:;i:;{::<iiv"r'ri}:�iiiij}:�?:•ii<'.iii.`•:i{i�iij::�'rii}'� i:}$$`:S�i`�:_f:::?+.?::+:$:•:i}�i$r i:$'•$i$i}'r$:}Ci$Y.�}.`•i'rii$$<i$$:4$i}i: ............ ................ .................. ............. ................................. . .. ......... . ... ...... ............ ........... . .................... .......... ........... ..... ... ...... .............................................. .............. .. .......... ..............................- ......... ........................................... ............ .................................. ... ...... ................ .......... .......................................... ......... .... .....................................I- ......... ..... ....................................... ........... ............I.... ................... ........ .................... ................ .............. ................................... ............ .......................... ...... .. ................................. ............. ............................... ............ .............................. ............................. ............................ ....... .......................... ...... ......................... ... .......... .... ........ .... .......... - ....lr. ....v:::.v.•:-.v}.:........,.:}:::::w:::.v:..........:....:::.v::::::w::::::.:�:::::::::::::.::�-.:v•::.::w::w.>.. :::::::.� ......... .....�-... ....:::::::::::.:?}:{L .}::v:::............ ■ I ler�ne+ntateon m p Ad inistration • prepared by NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. 4 May 1982 Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Saint Anthony _ 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418 RE: Kenzie Terrace Revitalization Program - Implementation File No: 802 Gentlemen: This letter forwards our proposal to assist the City of St. Anthony with the implementation and administration of the Kenzie Terrace Revitalization Program. We believe that the personnel team which we would assign to this project are uniquely qualified in this specialized undertaking. We are therefore hopeful that we will be given the opportunity to serve the St. Anthony community and to help the City achieve the improvement of this vital area. • We would like to express our appreciation to Mr. Childs for providing us background and information on the project and for the consideration and time which you devote to the review of our proposal . Respectfully submitted, NORTHWEST ASSOCIA Co's C. David R. Lic , AIC President DRL/nd cc: David M. Childs • 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Operation .Policies/Philosophies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Work Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Work Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ProgramBudget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Program Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Firm Qualifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 . I • INTRODUCTION The improvement and revitalization of the Kenzie Terrace Area has been a long standing goal of the City of St. Anthony. In recent years pursuit of this objective has become a primary focus of attention. Application for housing construction grants, as well as formulation of revitalization and improvement plans have resulted as a consequence. The community now, however, is at a crossroads and critical point in its efforts. The next phase of work involves implementation of plans in order to bring about' actual construction and improvements which will achieve the City's goals. Plans which have been prepared to date indicate that an initial and primary focus is to be directed and concentrated towards reuse and development of the St. Anthony Village Shopping Center. Another significant concern, however, is funding of a proposed Federal 202 Housing Project located to the north of Kenzie Terrace. Finally, and again from an initial first stage effort, there are minor site and area improvement projects which may be pursued. Northwest has reviewed, the area market study, proposed plans and projects, and based upon interest by the City, has prepared this proposal to provide assistance for implementation of what we refer to as Phase I of the revitalization effort. In the material which follows, we have first de- scribed what we believe to be critical operational policies and philosophies of our firm. These fundamental principles of operation which have been gained from extensive experience are ,seen as key elements contributing to the potential success of any project. The next section of this proposal outlines the stages of the work program to be undertaken. This includes a general description of the activities and products to be achieved. The third section of the proposal identifies the proposed program budget. We have attempted to breakdown and detail the basic items and stages in order to provide an indication of the work involved and the resulting costs. The personnel which Northwest would assign to the program are cited in Section Four. In this regard, work responsibilities, as well as related experience of staff is provided. Finally, the last section of the proposal contains a general statement of Northwest's qualifications and experience. 1 OPERATION POLICIES/PHILOSOPHY In undertaking any work. effort, it is extremely important to examine the underlying policies and philosophies which will govern the program. These fundamental guidelines have a substantial impact on the potential success or fa.ilure of a project. Based upon past experience, Northwest has four key policies and philosophies which are the basis of work it performs. At the heart and center of all work conducted by Northwest is- the recogni- tion that the program and product is to be that of the Client and not the Consultant. In this regard, Northwest -views its services as being one of a facilitator, implementing and carrying out the wishes of the community. This form of operation requires constant attention to and recognition of aspects of work which are policy in nature and hence require community . and public official determination. In past and current projects, Northwest has been highly successful in maintaining its proper role and function and not infringing upon the jurisdiction of policy makers. Northwest's recognition and performance of its role necessitates a second operational policy. This is the maintenance of constant communication with City staff and decision makers. Relative to the St. Anthony Kenzie Terrace Program, it is assumed that informal , typically daily contact will be main- tained with the City Manager. Formal written progress reports will also be submitted on a weekly or bi-weekly schedule. At the HRA level , monthly meet- ings at minimum are expected. During times of active policy formulation, meetings would be more frequent. Not to be overlooked or minimized in the communication process are the project area commercial and residential property owners and renters. An open channel of communication is seen as manditory with this group. This will serve to minize conflict and avoid rumors, and in all likelihood reveal implementation opportunities which otherwise might be passed by. As will be explained later in this proposal , the mechansims for formal and informal area property owner/renter communications will be established as part of Stage I of the work program. A third operating policy of Northwest is flexibility. It is believed that overall program success will be largely contingent upon maintaining an open mind and exploring new ideas and alternatives which may emerge as the implementation process takes place. This is not to imply that progress will be halted nor that unnecessary back tracking will be accepted. However, this. basic attitude of flexibility will help insure accomplishment of program goals which are more acceptable to those affected and will in all probability open new opportunities. A final and very critical philosophy of operation is Northwest's view of the de- velopment process. From our experience and perspective, development or redevelop- ment can be partially viewed as a highly technical process, which involves and _ follows legally and professionally established requirements and procedures. • 3 While the importance of these is not to be understated, these may be viewed as "text book" , check list functions. More often than not, it is not the technical aspect which decides the success or failure of a de- velopment program. The factor which is the curcial determination is the human side of development. It must be recognized that development impacts people's lives and the negative aspects of this impact must therefore be minimized. To the extent possible, time must be devoted to this concern and demonstrated care taken. Consideration must also be given to the developer as well . Development must be a negotiated process which takes into account and balances the public and also the developer's -needs. Northwest believes very strongly in this approach and concept of develop- ment and is committed to its realization as part of the work program. i I 4 WORK PROGRAM Based upon our review and evaluation of plans and studies prepared to date, Northwest views the administrative work now to be undertaken as the first phase of the implementation process. This phase involves re- development of the Village Shopping Center, assistance with the 202 Housing Project and construction of minor site improvements in the area. It is expected, however, that as Phase I is undertaken, other possible projects will be identified and pursued simultaneously as subsequent phases of work. In undertaking Phase I Implementation of the Kenzie Terrace Revitaliza- tion Program, Northwest has identified four progressive stages of work plus a number of continuous on-goi.ng activities which must be completed. These stages which are outlined and described below are purposely struc- tured into a process which minimizes the City's overall expense exposure and allows step by step decision-making. Should the City elect to termi- nate the effort due to unexpected, problems, it will not be committed to expenses. beyond that which has been actually performed. STAGE I - PROJECT FEASIBILITY/ORGANIZATION The initial stage of effort involves organizing the administration and policy aspects of the project and verifying the feasibility of the undertaking. The work tasks involved are: A. Contact property owners whose land is 'to be purchased for re- development. This task is necessary to determine the property owners' needs, concerns, timing requirements and is intended to establish a working relationship. Through these discussions, initial negotiations will take place and purchase price and terms will be identified. B. Review and update cost estimates of development and area site improvements. In order to verify the financial feasibility of the Phase I development, the construction and related costs of the projects will be updated. C. Prioritize development and area improvements. Based upon past plans and the update of construction and project costs, a listing of projects will be established. These will be presented to the HRA for a determination of priorities. With this policy aspect of the program established, a basic framework for administration of the program will be provided. • .6 • D. Calculate financial feasibility. With the costs and developments to be undertaken established, the financial feasibility of the project.(s) will be calculated. This will provide an indication to the HRA of what in fact can be accomplished as part of Phase I . Again, due to the policy aspects and implications resulting from the findings, they will be reviewed with the HRA in detail . E. 'Draft operations/administrative policies. In order to have a clear direction and for all involved to have thorough understanding of not only what is to be accomplished, but also how things are to be accomplished, operations and administrative policies will be drafted. These will include, but not limited to, definition of operation on property acquisition relocation, developer selection, land deposi- tion, rehabilitation, codes and ordinances, and public/area parti- cipation. This information will be presented to the HRA for review, finalization and enactment. ' F. Define development specifications and standards, and developer quali- fications. With the projects to be completed identified and with the implementation policies established, development specifications and standards will be defined. ' Additionally, desired developer qualifications will be identified in order to direct solicitation of proposals. STAGE II - PROJECT NEGOTIATION Assuming Stage I is successfully completed, work will be directed towards establishing the foundation of specific projects which are to be accomplished. A. Secure property purchase option. - The timing, terms and conditions of the property to be redeveloped will be negotiated. In anticipation of agreeable terms, the HRA will execute a property purchase option to be exercised at a later date. This process will involve continued review and advice of the HRA as well as the City Manager and HRA Attorney. B. Finalize and forward project specifications and requests for develop- ment proposals. The detailed standards and specifications will be assembled and made available to prospective developers. Requests for proposals will be directly forwarded to firms which are known to qualify. Additionally, a general announcement of the request for proposals will be made in the City's legal publication, plus other sources, such as Finance and Commerce, Corporate Report, etc. 7 C. Screening of developers and proposals. Following sufficient response time, proposals and qualifications will be reviewed and investigated. A summary form will be prepared listing evaluation criteria and pertinent comments on how developers and their proposals meet the criteria. D. HRA developer selection. The qualifying developer proposals and -evaluations will be presented to the HRA. These will be discussed and reviewed in detail with the staff and Commissioners. Following the HRA's acceptance of the proposals:, developers will be asked to make formal presentations and attend interviews. Based upon the written and verbal information, the HRA will proceed to select a • developer and authorize the negotiation of a development contract. STAGE III •- PROJECT ESTABLISHMENT A. Negotiation and sign development contract. With the assistance of the HRA staff and attorney, -a development contract will be drafted and submitted to the preferred developer. Points of the contract will be negotiated and refined, and upon general acceptance by HRA repre- sentatives and the developer, will be reviewed by the Commissioners. Assuming acceptance on the part of the HRA, the contract will be signed by the developer and subsequently by the HRA. B. Preparation and enactment of legal requirements. In conjunction with the HRA attorney and bond consultant, the required background informa- tion, exhibits and documentation will be established for the tax increment procedure. This material will be processed through re- quired hearings and meetings of the HRA, Planning Commission and City Council . Subsequently, the required documentation will be recorded and established with the County. C. Bond sale. Primarily within the jurisdiction of the HRA bond consultant, bonds for the project will be advertised and sold. STAGE IV - PROJECT IMPLMENTATION A. Exercise property purchase option. Upon receipt of capital , a first step of project implementation will be to secure the property for re- development and improvement. This task will be largely the responsi- bility of the HRA attorney. Northwest would assist as necessary. B. Organize and implement relocation. Those persons and/or businesses to be displaced would be recontacted and arrangements made for their orderly relocation. It is expected that. relocation would be phased and scheduled based upon the development and construction plans. Much of this work should, however, be a formality, as contact with the concerned individuals would be maintained throughout the entire process beginning with Stage I of work. 8 C. Authorize developer to proceed. With the property available for demolition and construction, the HRA would authorize the developer to proceed with his plans and improvements. Other minor area site improvements would also be scheduled and authorized. D. Project inspection/contract compliance. As construction and improve- ments proceed, constant inspection of progress and code and contract compliance would take place. Northwest would assist the City's Building Official in this regard, plus be responsible for develop- ment contract items which are beyond his typical jurisdiction. Periodic reports would be provided to HRA staff and Commissioners in order to keep them abreast of progress, as well as problems. E. Tax increment program administration. As the construction and improve- ment program continues, periodic reports and documentation must be prepared. A schedule of these requirements will be established and necessary work performed and submitted. ON-GOING ACTIVITIES The preceding stages and steps in the work program are orderly and pro- gressive tasks which must be accomplished. There are, however, a number of tasks and responsibilities which transcend the entire Phase I program. These items are highlighted below. A. Communications with area property renters/owners. As noted in the preceding chapter of the proposal , the maintenance of communication is viewed as critical to the success of the program. Throughout all stages of work, constant communication with area property owners/ renters is seen as necessary. It is expected that a formal means to achieve this objective will be to .continue the program task force which will hold periodic meetings. An "area" newsletter is also a concept which is -suggested' for total contact. On an informal basis, Northwest would also be available for phone calls to discuss individual.'s specific concerns and questions. Finally, continued personal , although informal meetings and contact would also be made with those persons- likely to be displaced by improvement projects. B. HRA communications. In order that proper policy direction is established and achieved, plus to assure accomplishment of the community's objectives, constant contact will be .maintained with the HRA Commissioners. This will occur through monthly written and oral reports, plus necessary meetings and briefing sessions. On an 'informal basis, Northwest would be available on a daily basis to respond to specific questions or problems. Typical daily and, at minimum, weekly contact will be made with the City Manager. This will keep him updated on work, plus 9 facilitate his coordination of City personnel and services which contribute to the project. The HRA attorney and bond consultant will also be continually advised on the program status so that their participation and contributions can be maximized. C. Federal 202 Housing Assistance. - Due to the critical need for housing in the community, Northwest will assist where possible and necessary .with securing the Federal 202 Housing Grant. Work in this regard will be coordinated with the City Manager and subject' to the review and approval of the HRA. D. Investigation of improvement opportunities. Beyond the specific work involved in Phase I of the implementation effort, attention must con- stantly be directed towards exploring what additional opportunities arise for improvement of the area. As these possibilities surface, they will be reviewed and analyzed and presented to the HRA. Should these new and additional projects appear acceptable and feasible, they will be organized and programmed into subsequent phases of the implementation effort. 10 • WORK SCHEDULE Past efforts on the part of the City of St. Anthony have established the basic ground work for implementation of the Kenzie Terrace Revitalization Program. While continued pursuit of this objective will require con- siderable work, it is believed necessary to target for construction during the 1983 season. In order to achieve this optimal date, major delays and difficulties must be avoided and all involved must commit the necessary time to complete the necessary policy and work items. Assuming work will be authorized in late May or early June of 1982 and also anticipating that the target construction date of late spring or summer of 1983 is desired, the parameters of the work schedule and timing of the various stages becomes evident t. Proceeding on this basis, we have identified the following completion dates for the stages of work involved: Work Stage Completion Stage I - Project Organization/Feasibility August 15, 1982 Stage II - Project Negotiation November 15, 1982 Stage III - Project Establishment March 1, 1983 Stage IV - Project Implementation (To be determined) To be emphasized is that these dates are a preliminary estimate of the time necessary to accomplish .the tasks and requirements of Phase I implementation. Northwest is open to revise and establish a time table which is in line with City objectives. Additionally, as work proceeds, Northwest would keep the HRA advised of progress and advise the Commissioners if advancements or delays were being encountered. Lz PROGRAM BUDGET (PHASE I - IMPLEMENTATION) In recognition of the work program outlined in the previous chapter, Northwest has assembled a preliminary budget of expenses associated with its administration of the program. We have identified the anti- cipated time and cost for the -first three stages of work and would propose to complete the tasks within each stage on a time and materials basis with a total cost not to exceed the maximum estimate for the respective stage. Due to the uncertainty which exists at this time in regard to the work items involved in Stage IV, we have not provided an estimate for this effort. We would be willing to define the expected costs for Stage IV at a later date and would be willing to'work on a percentage basis. We would caution the HRA, however, on the percentage approach. If working on a percentage basis, the Consultant has an interest to drive up the density or intensity of activity. This may work against objectives which the City may have. In the budget summary which follows, we have estimated and would commit to the budget maximums identified for each stage. In this regard, however, the number of public working meetings per stage are also in- dicated. As the Consultant has limited control over the number of formal working meetings, the number of meetings indicated are a maximum within the budget for each stage. Any meetings beyond this limit would be attended at a cost of $150 per session. Another point to be made is that attorney and bond consulting fees are not included. City services and salaries are also not calculated. To be noted is that to the extent possible; these services will be relied upon for copying, typing, etc. It would be expected that within the overall Phase I budget, these cost items would be included. It is also recognized that all administrative costs throughout the entire program cannot exceed the newly established legislative limits of ten percent. BUDGET SUMMARY Stage I 1.20 hours and expenses, plus 4 public $4,000.00 meetings (this includes computer analysis costs) Stage II 100 hours and expenses, plus 2 public meetings 3,000.00 Stage III 200 hours and expenses, plus 4 public meetings 7,000.00 Stage IV To be determined On-Going Activities - Stages I-III 1,500.00 14 . It is proposed that the various on-going activities would be completed for a flat $500 fee per stage. These activities would be typically completed .at a rate of $35.00 per hour. The average hourly charge would be $25.00 per hour for the balance of activities. Again, a point to be emphasized is that this is a preliminary budget, reflective of the work which Northwest presently anticipates. If work can -be reduced or if present City staff can assume some of the admini- stractive factors, overall consultant fees can be reduced. It is our sincere hope that this perspective of negotiation is maintained and recognized: We would greatly prefer to be selected for the program based upon qualifications rather than estimated budget. To a signi- ficant degree, all consultants charge approximately the same per hour of services. Costs therefore are typically reflective of work and expenses which are anticipated in delivery of a product. 15 PROGRAM PERSONNEL The St. Anthony Kenzie Terrace Revitalization Program is a challenging undertaking requiring diverse, plus unique and specialized talents. Northwest believes it has the qualified staff available to meet this need and to provide the necessary assistance which will facilitate a realiza- tion of the community's objective. Those individuals who would be the primary participants in the St. Anthony Program are identified in the following paragraphs. Mr. Daniel H. Wilson, Northwest Associate, would be assigned as the Program Manager. This assignment is based upon Mr. Wilson's thirteen years of pro- fessional work concentrating in housing and redevelopment, and tax incre- ment financed projects. This experience has span the full range of redevelop- ment activities, from planning through relocation, construction and real estate management. As an example, he currently serves as property manager for 120 private and public residential units. Additionally, he has recently or is currently involved in redevelopment, relocation and implementation programs in Watertown, Maple Plain, Chaska, Savage, Waconia, Lakeville and Scott County. As the Kenzie Terrace Program Manager, Mr. Wilson would hold primary responsibility for the project. He would be actively involved on a daily basis in all phases of work, plus supervise and coordinate all aspects of the program. Mr. David R. Licht, President of Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. , would participate in the program as a Senior Advisor. Mr. Licht has fifteen years of professional experience in serving local units of government in planning, redevelopment and administration. Relative to -the requirements of the Kenzie Terrace Program, Mr. Licht's experience with building con- struction at the University of Minnesota is highly relevant. Additionally, he has participated in redevelopment and tax increment projects in Iowa City, Iowa, Lakeville, Robbinsdale, Oak Park Heights, Delano and Breckenridge. In the Kenzie Terrace Program, Mr. Licht would assist Mr. Wilson and the City in all phases of work, but especially property owner/renter communications, property negotiation, and construction coordination. During building and improvement construction, Mr. Bradley J. Nielsen, a Northwest staff person who is a Certified Building Official , would assist with project inspection. As noted previously, it is anticipated that the City Building Official will be responsible for general plan review and con- struction inspection. Mr. Nielsen would, however, coordinate with the City's Building Official and provide back-up as needed. Additionally, he would undertake additional project inspections to insure general building code compliance. He would also, however, provide inspection service to insure compliance with specifications unique to the project and development contract which are typically beyond requirements of the Uniform Building Code. 16 A fourth primary participant in the Kenzie Terrace Project would be Alan Brixius. Mr. Brixius is a Northwest staff member with three years of professional work. Mr. Brixius would serve as Mr. Wilson's primary assistant on the project. It is anticipated that the four individuals identified above would be the primary Northwest personnel members involved on a constant basis in the Kenzie Terrace Program. Other specialized Northwest staff people are, however, available to participate in the Program, should it be necessary. Landscape Architects and Site Planning Specialists are, for example, avail- able to plan, critique, program, supervise and inspect major and minor building and improvement projects which may be undertaken and pursued within the revitalization area. The combination of these individuals is seen as providing the City of St. Anthony with a qualified team of specialists which is necessary for a comprehensive implementation and administrative effort. Resumes of the key Northwest personnel to be assigned to the Kenzie Terrace Program are contained on the following pages. • 17 DANIEL H . WILSON ASSOCIATE EDUCATION: University of Minnesota, Bachelor of Science-Marketing University of Minnesota, Graduate Work in Marketing, Finance, and Economics EXPERIENCE: 1979-Present Consultant - Providing Professional Assistances on Housing Research, Development and Management 1976-1979 Executive Director, Waconia Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1972-1976 Assistant Executive Director, LeSueur Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1970-1972 Loan Officer, Minneapolis Housing and Redevelop- ment Authority-Jordan Code Enforcement Project 1969-1970 Planning Intern, Minneapolis Housing and Redevelopment Authority-West Broadway Project AREAS OF SPECIALTY: Housing Projects: Planning, development and implementation of sub- sidized and market rate housing projects. Market analysis and residential improvement/development/ redevelopment plans. Rehabilitation Projects: Residential and commercial rehabilitation loan programs and historic preservation district projects. Tax Increment Financing: Project feasibility analysis, financing plan pre- paration and district development and management. Market Research: Market feasibility studies for housing and commercial developments. Grantsmanship: Prepare grant applications for Community Development Block Grants, industrial development, park projects, housing programs and redevelopment projects. Project Management: Carry out project administration and implementation of public and private development projects with specialty in relocation assistance. 18 DAVID R. LICHT, AICP President E DUCAT ION: University of Iowa, Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Social Science University of Iowa, Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning EXPERIENCE: 1973-Present: President and Principal, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. 1974-1980: President and Principal, Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. 1970-1973: Assistant Director, Office of Physical Planning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 1969-1974: Coordinator-Instructor, Urban Planning Technician Program and Community Services Program, North Hennepin Community College, Minneapolis, Minnesota 1970-1973: Planning Consultant: City of Robbinsdale, Minnesota; City of Crystal, Minnesota; Dakota Street Improvement Association, Aberdeen, South Dakota; University of South Dakota Student Ecology Committee, Vermillion, South Dakota 197.1 71973: Consultant-Instructor for St. John's University Micro City Project for the Community Official Planning Education Program 1969-1970: Senior Planner, Division of Planning and Development, City of Minneapolis, Minnesota 1967-1969: Planner, Department of Planning and Urban Renewal, City of Iowa City, Iowa AREAS OF SPECIALTY: Comprehensive Planning: Consultant services to units of local and regional government on development programming and management of comprehensive plans, policy planning,, land use and environmental regulations, and implementation. Redevelopment Planning: Administrative and technical assistance to local agencies on residential and commercial renewal efforts including specialized background on tax increment financing procedures. Institutional and Supervision and execution of comprehensive campus-wide, sub- Campus Planning: area and building projects and programs for educational institutions. Transportation Planning: Supervision, analysis and implementation of comprehensive and subelement transportation plans and programs, with special emphasis on transit and parking. Administration: Technical and managerial assistance to local units of government with emphasis on grant-in-aid application, general administration and inter-governmental relations. 19 DAVID R. LICHT Page Two Citizen Participation: Organizing and administering citizen, neighborhood and interest group involvement and participation in the planning and development process. Planning Education: Consulting and teaching services in the organization and conduct of public official and citizen educational programs regarding the comprehensive planning and implementation process. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Institute of Certified Planners - Member American Planning Association - Member Minnesota Chapter of American Planning Association - Member Minnesota Society of Architects - Professional Affiliate American Institute of Architects - Professional Affiliate Minnesota Planning Association • 20 BRADLEY J . NIELSEN Senior Planner EDUCATION: North Hennepin Community College Urban Planning/Architectural Technology/Building Inspection Curriculum EXPERIENCE: 1980-Present: Senior Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. 1978-1980: Community Planner, Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. 1977-1978: Director of Graphics Department, Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. 1974-1977: Graphics Technician/Planning Aide, Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. 1974: Environmental Inspector, Robbinsdale, Minnesota 1973: Graphics Technician, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. AREAS OF SPECIALTY: Municipal Planning: Conducting field research, compiling inventory data and translation to graphics as well as written form. Technical assistance to local units of government in the areas of compre- hensive planning, -policy planning and administering municipal instruments of plan implementation. Site Planning and Design: Preparation and evaluation of site plans and preliminary plats with emphasis on residential development. Inspection/Zoning Municipal building inspection, environmental and building Administration: condition surveys and analysis, code and ordinance enforcement. Graphics Arts: Design and preparation of maps, charts and related graphics used in the visual presentation of comprehensive plans, ordinance development, market research and urban study projects. Photography: Promotional slide presentation, architectural and graphic copy work. Photo lay-up and mounting. CERTIFICATION: Minnesota State Certified Building Official No. 0606 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Minnesota Planning Association • 21 ALAN BRIXIUS Planner EDUCATION: St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota, B.A. Urban Affairs Specializing in Urban Planning EXPERIENCE: Present: Community Planner with Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. 1979-1980: Community Planner with Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. AREAS OF SPECIALTY: Comprehensive Planning: Assist the communities'in the preparation of comprehensive plans in accordance with the Mandatory Land Planning Act. Involved with baseline data and formulation of proposed plans for land use, transportation, natural resources and housing. Development Evaluation: Analyze and evaluate proposed development plans, with regard to the community's comprehensive plan, ordinances, and potential environmental impacts. Inventory and Research: Data collection and analysis, housing condition survey, traffic • sign inventory, population and housing statistics. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS : Minnesota Planning Association 22 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. GENERAL STATEMENT OF THE FIRM'S QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. is a private planning consulting firm officed in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St. Paul , Minnesota. The company was formed in 1973. The company provides land use planning and development services in both the public and private sectors. This balance provides awareness and experience in the development process, in addition to the structure of community development. The company offers an integrated set of services in real estate analysis, community planning, and urban design. We have the technical competencies, experience and commitment to provide comprehensive analysis and identification of solutions for client planning problems. Principals are in direct professional relationships with clients on a regular, as needed basis. Specific services provided by the firm are listed below by general category: ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND FINANCIAL PLANNING: ® Land Use Market Feasibility and Absorption o Site Location and Facilities Planning • o Attitudinal Surveys and Consumer Needs Assessment O Project Cash Flow Simulations - Fiscal Analysis o Tax Impact Studies e Economic Feasibility Studies o Market Penetration Studies, Consumer Surveys COMMUNITY PLANNING: • Planning Tactics - Policy Issue Evaluation ® Preparation of Comprehensive Plans - Cities/Counties/School Districts o Project Planning and Implementation ® Housing Needs Analysis ® Central Business District Redevelopment ® Traffic and Parking Studies e Mass Transit Planning o Annexation and Consolidation Studies ® Land Use Code and Ordinance Development o Capital Improvement Programming ` o Technical Assistance to Local Government • 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN: o Ecological Analysis and Resource Management Studies ® Environmental Assessment Impact Statements ® Parks, Trails and Recreation Systems ® Landscape Plans URBAN DESIGN: a Project Planning and Concept Design • PUD Site Planning and Implementation a Prelimi.nary Plats ® -Central Business District Image Studies e Park Systems and Park Design e Campus and Institutional Site Planning In support of the professional services, principals assist public and private clients in programs of community information, expert witness testimony and on-going retainer relationships to implement specific planning programs and objectives. Clients are accepted with defined mutual agreement on objectives, scope of work and anticipated benefit of services in relation to the cost. Fees are related to the scope of assignment, including the compensation of time, direct costs and other company resources as may be required. Charges may be time-billed against a maximum appropriation, or a fixed fee may be set for detailed work specifications. Retainer relationships are available for extended assignments, or areas in which a continued preferential staff assign- ment is requested. The confidential nature of assignments and data is strictly preserved at the request of the client. The growth and continued success of NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. is directly dependent upon the effectiveness we have in meeting client objectives and seeing projects successfully implemented. Our corporate objectives are thus to maintain the highest professional standards and technical skills to meet the increasing demand for comprehensive planning services. In addition to the philosophy of offering a multi-disciplined, comprehensive consulting service covering all planning and development concerns, Northwest has formulated and operates on the basis of several . fundamental and professional service concepts. On any project undertaken by the firm, a principal is assigned to and assumes responsibility for the work and product involved. This active participation by Northwest's senior personnel provides the client with the highest possible quality of service and expertise available. ,CITY OF ST. ANTHONY COUNCIL AGENDA • May 11, 1982 7 : 30 P.M. A. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. C. Approval of April 27, 1982 Council minutes . Approval of May 4, 1982 Council Work Session minutes. D. Licenses/Permits/Petitions . 1. Apache Merchants Association-Carnival Ride Permit. E. Presentation of Claims . 1. Verified Claims. ACTION: Recommend approval. Requested Public Appearance State Senator Neil Dieterich. F. Reports. 1. Council Reports . a. Mayor Sundland d. Councilman Marks b. Councilman Enrooth. e. Councilman Ranallo C. Councilman Letourneau 2. Commissions/Departments/Committees .. a. Fire Department Monthly Report-April, 1982. b. Equipment- Exchange Program- with Neighboring Cities. C. Annual Water Report-State Health Department. d. Liquor Operation. .Sales Summary,. January-April, 1982 . 3. City Manager. a. Notes on May 5 , 1982 Staff Meeting. b. Proposed .Surface .Water Management Plan. C. Status-Hennepin County. Public Safety Radio Systems . d. Redistricting Update. e. A.M.M. Annual Meeting and Elections . G. Public Hearings . 1. 7 : 45 P.M. Amendment of Revenue Sharing Budget. a.. Resolution 82-019 (Resolution transferring $9 ,000 from • Special Police Fund to General Fund) . b. Resolution 82-020 (Resolution transferring. $14 ,600 from Revenue Sharing to General Fund) . -2- 2 . 8 :00 P.M. Anthony Lane North Assessment Hearing . H. New Business . 1. Summer Recreation Report by Tom McMullen. 2 . Sunset Memorial Park - St.. Anthony Boulevard Bridge Underpass Request. 3. County Road "D" Project - Storm Drainage Situation Update. I. Unfinished Business. 1. Ordinance. 1982-004, Relating to Water Rates - 3rd reading/ adoption. 2. Ordinance 1982-003, Proposed Fence Ordinance - 2nd reading 3. Consideration of Insurance Bids. 4. Bernhard P.reussner Parking Concerns . 5. Sroga Service Station - License. 6 . Craig Morris - Fence Completion. J. Adjournment. 0 • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY COUNCIL MINUTES • April 27 , 1982 Mayor Sundland opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance at 7 : 30 P .M. Present for roll call : Marks , Ranallo, Sundland, Letourneau and Enrooth. Also present: Dave Childs , City Manager; Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant; William Soth, City Attorney ; and Larry Hamer, Public Works Director. Motion by Councilman Enrooth and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to approve as submitted the minutes for the Council meeting held April 13 , 1982 . Motion carried unanimously. The Council had tabled the license for the Sroga Standard Station , 3201 Stinson Boulevard, at their April 13th meeting and had invited Mr. Sroga and his neighbors to air their differences regarding the appearance of the service station at this meeting. The Mayor reported Mr. Sroga had called him that evening to -report his inability to be in attendance but willingness to attempt to satisfy suggestions from the neighbors which are economically feasible. Two residents , Roman H. Seid.e , 3117 Stinson Boulevard and Wayne E. Thompson, 3721 Foss Road, had accepted the invitation. Mr. Seid e indicated his disappointment upon moving to St. Anthony , "a well kept community" to having a .station near his home which is "continuously an eye sore and a detriment to the neighborhood" . He reported the dumpster on the site is constantly overflowing and there are always cars parked on the right-of-way, some with "For Sale" signs on them. The fenced in area is underutilized, according to Mr. Seide . Mr. Thompson 's only comment was that many of the cars being sold belong to neighbors of the Sroga's and said he was one of those who availed himself of that service. Mr. Seid� said he was disappointed, but not surprised , so many of the neighbors who have the same concerns were not present. He speculated, "they like Joe and his father and don ' t want to cause them .problems , but do want the station cleaned up" . His assumption was shared by most of the Council members who also. did not want a confronta- tion between Mr. Sroga and his neighbors , but rather preferred that the differences be mediated by the Manager on an individual basis in an attempt to work out some acceptable agreement before the next Council meeting. Mr. Soth indicated the City can hold up the license on the station at least until Mr. Sroga agrees to provide some solution to the problem and., if that is not possible , the legal alternatives would have to be considered on the basis of previous agreements between the City and • Mr. Sroga. Councilman Marks recalled that when he was on the Planning Commission it took almost six years for the City to get fencing installed so vehicles parked on the site would be screened from the neighbors ' properties and Stinson Boulevard. Councilman Letourneau reminded the -2- Council that a good number of the vehicles which are for sale on the property have been towed there at City Police request and selling them . is the only way Mr. -Sroga -has of getting them off his property . Council- man Enrooth indicated his determination to get the site cleaned up in any event. Staff will research Council and Planning Commission minutes for references to agreements with Mr. Sroga. Motion by Councilman Enrooth and seconded by Councilman Marks to table action on the renewal of the service station license for the Sroga Station at 3201 Stinson Boulevard until the Council 's next meeting, May 11th. Motion carried unanimously. State Representative John Rose introduced himself as the City 's new legislator under the redistricting of St. Anthony into District 63A. He offered to be available to answer any City concerns regarding legislative action, but indicated it has been his policy to stay out of local conflicts such as closing of schools and street improvements . The legislator distributed copies of his memorandum to local units of government which he said- addresses legislation in -the 1982 Omnibus Tax Bill H.F. 1872 which he believes may be significant to the cities in his new district. Councilman Marks who has been endorsed to oppose Representative Rose in the next election, introduced himself to him and they both promised to take "the high road in the coming campaign" . Mr. Childs told Councilman Enrooth that comparisons of prosecution ® costs and fines collected by the City have been made and he recalled the fines amounting to $65 ,000 with legal fees being $18 ,000 . He added that a good percentage of the balance is eaten up by the costs of incarcerations , which the Mayor commented were more than if the prisoners would be housed in the Northgate Motel. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to approve payment of $2 ,145 . 25 to the Dorsey firm for legal services during January, 1982 . Motion carried unanimously. Bernard Preussner, 3209 Skycroft Drive , had requested he be permitted to appear before the Council to seek their help in a longstanding pro- blem he is having with his neighbors across the street who park in front of his house "twenty-four hours a day, every day" , and prevent the street in front from being swept the first time the crews come around. Conversations with the Kellys have failed to correct the situation, and Mr. Preussner wondered if the City has some ordinance which can be enforced. He reported the Minneapolis Police Department has a law on the books which they can enforce if a resident files a complaint. Mayor Sundland indicated he would like to find out if the City has other references to time parking limits than winter restrictions , since he sees involving the Police in neighbor disputes as a "no win" situation. Mr. Hamer said he could have his crews post paper signs when they are sweeping that street and Councilman Marks requested staff research how other communities handle problems of this type. The Public Works Director then reported problems he is encountering with this year' s branch pickup with some materials being imported from out- side the City , and so much material other than branches left out to be -3- picked up. He is especially concerned with the bushes people leave out because the dirt which adheres to them can ruin the chipping blades • which cost $90 a piece , and .warned it will "take a major hauler to clean up all the materials left out this year" . Councilman Enrooth believes the City is being taken advantage of and is concerned with fire hazards if the unacceptable materials are left in the right-of-ways and it doesn' t rain. The consensus was that the crews should adhere strictly to the restrictions published in the Newsletter. Councilman Marks said he agreed with the Mayor that this is a highly visible service , appreciated by the residents but seeing the misuse of the service and the fact that "we can' t afford to clean up the whole City" , suggested the service be closely scrutinized in the next budget and certainly placed in a lower priority than Police and Fire Service. Mr. Hamer then told the Council that it is his Department's custom to replace any sod which has been displaced by the snow plows , if it cannot be saved in any other way. The March Financial Report was discussed with Mr. Childs and that report as well as the March Police Report and minutes for the April 13th meeting of the Chemical Abuse Information Committee were accepted as informational. Judy Makowske reported the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held April 20 , 1982 . She explained the Commission' s reluctance to make a recommendation related to the tanning salons proposed for . Apache Plaza Shopping Center since the matter had not gotten on the agenda for the meeting and they had no opportunity to study this new . concept. The Mayor commended the Commission for giving the applicant the courtesy of hearing his proposal since they were not required to do so. Mrs . Makowske told the Council the Commission members had found the discussions they had with Senior Federation Representatives very helpful in deliverations on the variances to City ordinance requirements which will be necessary for the senior housing proposed on Kenzie Terrace. She said they were especially interested to see the HUD guidelines which govern the size of the units and to hear the explanations of why a service access to the rear of the building will be required off Wilson Street and how parking will be handled when there is a conflict in activities for the senior building and the Legion Club next door. Two Federation members , Archie Fjeld and Robert Giere were again present to discuss the proposal as was Caroline Olson, who serves on the Greater Minneapolis Metro Housing Corporation. Mr. Fjeld reported there has been no confirmation that Hennepin County is willing to provide a crossing light for pedestrian access to the St. Anthony Shopping Center across Kenzie Terrace which was one of the reasons he believes the proposal failed to become a HUD recipient the first time around. Mr. Berg confirmed the City can probably use CDBG funds to provide the light if Commissioner Sivanich is unsuccessful in getting Hennepin County to fund it. Mr. Soth asked the financial consultant what assurances the City has that the building will remain senior housing. Mr. Giere told him he would anticipate the apartments will be available to only senior citizens for at least 20 years and , if HUD should decide to change the occupancy complexion of the project, it would probably only be for handicapped. -4- He also pointed out that the sponsoring organization is Augustana • Homes who only provide senior housing. Ms . Olson urged City officials to write to HUD officials indicating the City is attempting to. adhere to all the HUD guidelines but believes the project would be more successful with only one bedroom units . Mr. Giere added, that he hopes "HUD' s advertisement of the project the coming weekend won't include efficiencies for the project" . Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to grant the variances to the City Zoning Ordinance requirements necessary for the construction of a 60 unit senior building, as proposed, on the vacant lot currently identified as Plat 63507 , Parcel 7620 by the Northeast Senior Federation, with funding from the HUD 202 program including: (1) building height from 35 to 372 feet for a 22 foot variance ; (2) from 30 to 60 dwelling units for a 30 unit variance ; and (3) unit floor area efficiencies, up to 25% efficiencies , from 500 -to 415 .square feet, for a total variance of 86 square feet; up to 100% one bedroom units , from 650 to 540 square feet, for a total variance of 110 square feet. The Council finds that: ® (A) Because of the location of this site and the surrounding properties , this property is particularly well suited to use for senior citi- zen housing, which is economically feasible only with public funding. One of the requirements of this funding is that smaller efficiency units be included. (B) The purpose of the variances are not merely to increase the value of the property. (C) A hardship is caused by the City 's ordinance in combination with the public funding requirements and not by the persons having an interest in the land. The Council also agrees with the Planning Commission that: (.A) The proposed building is designed and intended to serve only senior citizens . (.B) The proposed building is designed and intended to utilize public funding. (C) The City of St. Anthony has no other similar non-profit senior housing facilities . (D) The City of St. Anthony has a strong demand for provision of • non-profit senior housing facilities . (E) Sufficient distance and screening in the plan (as labeled and included in this recommendation) reduces any potential negative impact from building height or density on the adjacent property owners . -5- (F) Similar senior housing projects in Minneapolis and Columbia Heights have similar; ' or, in fact, smaller dwelling units ; greater or equal number of dwelling units per square foot of land area (density) ; are built higher; and have fewer parking spaces .per dwelling unit and less landscaping/screening that this proposal. (G) Real estate taxes produced by this development will be far greater than those produced by the vacant land. (H) Site access and neighboring homeowners ' concerns have been adequately addressed. (I) The City of St. Anthony has no specific or adequate zoning regula- tions for senior housing. (J) The City foresees this project may spur further Kenzie Terrace redevelopment and rejuvenation. (K) No adverse input was received during the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. Staff was requested to write to HUD officials indicating the City 's interest in having only one bedroom units for the project. Craig Morris , proprietor of the hairstyling salon at 3909 Silver Lake Road, appeared to discuss his non-conformance with landscaping and fencing requirements of the Hedlund PUD which were set when he was granted a Conditional Use Permit and as modified by the Council, Nov- ember 24 , 1981. Because these improvements had not been provided as agreed to, the Commission had recommended the Letter of Credit guarantee- ing conformance be cashed in and the proceeds used to construct a fence and install the shrubbery , if these improvements are not made by Mr. Morris in a reasonable time , according to the Planning Commission. representative. Mr. Morris indicated the chain link fence would be in by the following Friday and said the plantings have been delivered to the site to be planted as soon as the Johnson property to the north of him is graded. * The salon owner said because of lack of commercial money, he has been unable to assume ownership of the property , but assured the Council "I will be here for a long time"'. Mr. Morris then indicated he could see the necessity for a fence between his property and that of Ken Lee behind him, but not for the side fencing, which in his opinion "has no usefulness" . When Mr. Morris said he believed the fencing had been his idea in the first place , that assumption was corrected by the Mayor and Councilman Marks who recalled the original PUD requirements were for an eight foot opaque fence to screen the commercial uses which were anticipated for the west side of the site from the residential development to the east. The requirement was modified to a six foot fence when the townhouses were approved for the Silver Lake Road side of the site. Mr. Lee was present and indicated he has agreed to pay half the cost of O a heavy gauge chain link fence (up to $250 . 00) between his and Mr. Morris ' property rather than have the fence Mr. Morris had started to install which, in his opinion , would last only a few years at best. -6- He agreed with Mr. Morris that slatting the fence was not necessary and had no interest in whether or not side fences were provided on the • Morris property. Councilman Enrooth indicated he believes as long as Mr. Lee, who has to look at the fence , doesn ' t see the need for slats , an opaque fence at this stage of development for the PUD is probably not necessary , especially since this type of fencing has not proved very durable in the past. There was Council agreement, however, that the two side fences should be provided by Mr. Morris. Mr. Lee disagreed with Mr. Morris that the fence could be installed sooner than two weeks , and, since the City would lose the Letter of Credit proceeds if it is not revoked before May 1st, the Mayor indi- cated he believed the document should be revoked April 30th and the cash retained to put in the improvements if they are not provided in a satisfactory manner within a reasonable time by Mr. Morris, with the remainder returned to Gordon Hedlund when the improvements are in. Mr. Soth asked Mr. Morris whether he had a monetary interest in the Letter of Credit proceeds and the shop owner indicated he did not. The Attorney then told the Council he believes the proposed fence would be keeping with the PUD, since the original requirement had been for a chain link fence. Mr. Berg said Sid Johnson had indicated to him that he proposes to landscape his property adjoining Mr. Morris ' as soon as possible so he can put the townhouses up for sale. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to direct staff to draw on the Letter of Credit #1091 for $3 ,200 held• at the First State Bank of New Brighton before its expiration date , May 1 , 1982 . Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to indicate Council agreement that the chain link fencing to be installed between the Craig & Company property at 3909 Silver Lake Road and Lee property to the east on Penrod Lane and on the sides not be required to be slatted. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Morris admitted he had not kept his agreement to have his place of business lit only during working hours but said he will have a timing system installed in two weeks . Mrs . Makowske reported . the Commission recommends the proposed fence ordinance should be changed to require fences be constructed at least six inches behind the property line because it is often difficult to tell exactly where the lot line is without an expensive survey . Mr. Hamer indicated the reason he did not include this requirement in the ordinance was because there is often a maintenance problem where fences are built away from the lot line and said some of the fences in the City are set back as much as four feet. The City inspection when a (license or building permit) is granted will assure the fence is • constructed on the owner's property . for. Childs told Mrs . Makowske the City has the equipment for identifying buried stakes . Mr. Hamer said he believes requiring neighbor agreements for fences is not realistic, since some neighbors are unable to discuss this -7- subject. Mr. Soth said he sees legal problems with joint ownership of fences and recommended fences be installed on one property and construction costs shared, if desired. The Public Works Director stated that fences which are grandfathered in will be permitted to remain as they are the same as signs and non-con- forming lots until the use or structure is substantially altered. Mr. * Childs said the Fire and Police Departments in the cities he previously served had reported problems with fences higher than six feet and said the swimming pool ordinance requires fences "not less than six feet high" . Mrs . Makowske indicated the irregular configuration of some lots in the City might permit a six foot fence being built. right in front of a neighbor's picture window. The Council agreed this would be a reasonable amendment. Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to approve the first reading of Ordinance 1982-003 with the following addition to the wording of Subdivision 3 of Requirements on the second page: "and no fence in the front yard shall be over four feet in height with the height of all fences measured from the natural grade of the property. " ORDINANCE 1982-003 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO FENCES; REQUIRING ® BUILDING PERMIT; REGULATING LOCATIONS; PROHIBITING CERTAIN FENCES; AMENDING THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING A SECTION Motion carried unanimously . Keith Grewe , 1001 Orchard Lane, whose request to operate a tanning salon in Apache Plaza Mall percipitated the proposed City ordinance amendment which would permit such an operation as a conditionally permitted use in the City, appeared along with Tom Van Meter, Presi- dent of Tan Me, Inc. , the franchise under which Mr. Grewe proposes to operate, to discuss their request with the Council. Mrs . Makowske reiterated that the Commission had not acted on the request because it was not on the Commission agenda which is posted throughout the City and through which interested residents could have been alerted to attend the meeting. Mr. Grewe and the franchise official repeated their belief that the health aspects of the salons should fit them into a category already established in the City Ordinance for a similar use. Mr. Van Meter addressed the "massage image" he believes people perceive for this unfamiliar business but speculated many of the exist- ing businesses in the City already offer tanning services to their clients . He invited Council members to visit his own salon in Maplewood to see for themselves what type of operation they can expect if they approve the salon for Apache. • Mayor Sundland told them he agrees with the City Attorney ' s opinion that the tanning salons do not fit into an existing category in the City Ordinance and the proposal will have to be presented at a public hearing before the Planning Commission as an ordinance amendment which is required to be given .three readings by the Council , and, finally , considered for Conditional Use Permit under the ordinance amendment , if it passes . He explained that the same procedure had been followed when a video center was permitted to operate at Apache and when auctions were permitted to be in the City . The Mayor personally can see the last two readings being waived by the Council if the Commission has no problem with the proposal and the application for a Conditional Use Permit considered at the same meeting as the first reading. Any health problems or perceived illicit operations can be addressed within the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit. Councilman Ranallo indiciated he had little or no opportunity to study the proposal and cautioned the applicant that there is no assurance that the normal procedure for approval would not be followed. Mr. Soth confirmed that the City could accept the application fee which would have to be returned if the amendment or Conditional Use Permit is not approved. Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Marks to schedule a public hearing before the Planning Commission May 18 , 19821, where the proposed ordinance amendment precipitated by the request for a tanning salon to be operated in the Apache Plaza Mall will be con- . sidered, and based on a Commission recommendation of approval, to permit a parallel process whereby the application for a Conditional Use Permit -can be considered along with the ordinance amendment by Council. Motion carried unanimously. Doug Woods gave a slide presentation on landfill alternatives being ® considered by the Ramsey County Environmental Health Committee. Accepted as informational were the schedule of the Friday morning meetings sponsored by Ramsey County Commissioner Salverda; AMM re- actions to the Metropolitan Council proposals for a Surface Water Management Plan and the notes on the April 21st staff meeting. Mr. Childs requested Council input before the Metro Council meeting April 29th and reminded the Council that the legislative body established to over- see the Metropolitan Council will hold its first meeting outside the Capitol in Shakopee May 5th and this will be another opportunity for the Council to express their views on the Metro Council. The Council accepted as an agenda addendum the resolution submitted by Mr. Hamer for Council approval of taking of bids on the St. Anthony Bridge project. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to adopt Resolution 82-017 and approve the plans and specifications submitted by the Public Works Director for the St. Anthony Bridge rebuilding project. RESOLUTION 82-017 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ST. ANTHONY BOULEVARD BRIDGE AND APPROACH Motion carried unanimously. A Council work session with the Police Department and a request regard- ing a proposed development concept was scheduled for 7 :00 P .M. , May 4th. s -9- Neither staff nor Council members have received calls related to the proposed raise in water rates . OMotion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to approve the second reading of Ordinance 1982-004 . ORDINANCE 1982-004 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO WATER RATES; AMENDING SURDS. 2 AND 3 OF SECTION 550:00 OF THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY Motion carried unanimously . Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to appoint Roger Salsbury, 3412 Highcrest; Ron Hanson, 2704 32nd Avenue. N.E. ; Dick Timmer, 3617 Belden Drive , to serve along with Larry Hamer and Councilman Enrooth on the Skating Rink Study Committee , with a goal of August 10 , 1982 set for the final committee report on the future ice skating needs and services for St. Anthony. Motion carried unanimously . Ray Nelson, Liquor Operations Manager, had proposed a wide-screen for television showing of sports events be purchased as a method. of promo- tion of the liquor operation and Mr. Childs reported quotes which had been taken and recommended which should be accepted. Mr. Soth con- firmed that any capital expenditure of more than $1 ,000 requires OCouncil approval. Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to adopt the resolution which authorizes the awarding of the bid for a Kloss T.V. System to Digital Den for $3 ,441. 45 and to accept the rec- commendation that .a VCR type system be purchased at a later date to enhance the capabilities . The Council also agrees that live music should be terminated with the addition of the video system. RESOLUTION 82-018 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE AWARDING OF THE BID FOR A VIDEO TELEVISION SYSTEM Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to approve Change Order #1 for the repair of Well #4 which will permit the replace- ment of 18 sections of column pipe at $4 ,518 and use of stainless steel shafting to make necessary repairs costing $1,012 . 50 to be paid from the City Water Funds , as recommended by the Public Works Director. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to adjourn the meeting at 10 : 50 P .M. OMotion carried unanimously . -10- 0 Respectfully submitted , Helen Crowe Secretary Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 0 O CITY OF ST. ANTHONY CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES May 4 , 1982 The work session was called to order at 7 :10 P.M. , Tuesday , May 4 , 1982 in the City Administrative offices . Present: Mayor Sundland and Councilmen Enrooth, Letourneau , Marks and Ranallo. Absent: None. Also present: City Manager Childs and Police Chief Hickerson. 1. The first item of business was an informal discussion with the Chief of Police , Don Hickerson, about questions and concerns of the Council. a. The St. Anthony Fun Center was discussed. Some Councilmen related the substance of calls and complaints they have received over the years . . Many times substance may be lacking in the complaints and they may only be parents who are unable to keep their children out of the Center and away from the games . It was generally agreed that the Manager runs a clean operation and .he himself calls the police frequently to handle • problems and attempts to work closely with them. As a side discussion , the use of complaint forms was discussed as a means- of recording and classifying calls. This is a good recordkeeping function as well as a method to determine if a particular problem really has had "lots" of complaints . b. Chief Hickerson reported that there are two Police Reserves , that they will be receiving their final four-hour training session on Saturday, May 8th and will try to be scheduled for introduction to the Council at their May 11th meeting. He also stated that a possible additional Reserve Officer has expressed interest, but lives in N.E. Minneapolis . The Council generally agreed that such applications should be brought on a case-by-case -basis but that this particular one would -probably be favorably considered. Mayor Sundland also felt that Jim Schwartz (St. Anthony Bulletin) should be contacted for pub- licity on the new Reserves completing training. C. The use of MAPSI (animal patrol) services was discussed. Councilman Ranallo had a discussion with one of the MAPSI officers and. found that they pick up virtually no animals when on patrol. More often, they will pick up injured animals or those which have already been captured. It was felt that perhaps the Police could watch at-large animals more closely and issue tags when ownership can be proven. -2- d. The progress of Crime Watch was discussed. Training of staff persons is nearly complete . To date , minor -interest has been Sshown by residents (even those who have been burglarized) but efforts will continue. The Apache Mobile Station has agreed to participate in a premises security check. Press coverage in that process (.since they are the first) was also thought to be desirable. e. Chief Hickerson also reported on burglaries for 1982 . Although burglaries are down, many are concentrated in a small neighbor- hood and seem to be attributable to two or three specific groups , all of whom are known, but have to be pinned to the crime site. f. The bike patrol program and bike safety programs will be starting soon and the group also discussed a recent training session for Public Works employees - as part of the Crime Watch program. 2. The Council discussed a request from Sentinel Management Company regarding the acceptability of constructing single family housing on Silver Lane north of the Equinox Apartments . They state in their memo that the maintenance of the berms north of the apart- ments is a tremendous burden and would like Council reaction to the proposal. The Council asked the City Manager to contact the company to get some specifics regarding their proposal and then to contact some of the current residents on Silver Lane to get • their reaction to such a proposal. 3. The Council approved a motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to allow a beer permit to Shirley Nordahl for beer in Central Park on Mother' s Day , May 9th. The motion carried on a 4 to 1 vote. The meeting adjourned at 10 :10 P.M. Respectfully submitted David M. Childs , City Manager Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution May 5, 1982 Ordinance Licenses/Permits-1 Date Action Requested, X Formal Action/Motion Title Apache Merchants Other Association - Carnival May 11 , 1982 Ride Permit TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: We have received a request from the Apache Merchants Association for a permit to allow Don ' s Amusement Enterprises , Inc. to operate rides at Apache Plaza from May 25 - 31 (seven days) . The license fee (.$225.0.0),, clean-up deposit (.$250.00) and the required Certificate of Insurance have all been received. • FISCAL IMPACT: i ALTERNATIVES : RECOMMENDATION: Approve as submitted. i • CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : �CLI ST ANTHONY A/N CHECK REGISTER D A T F , CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT 10687 DAVID CHILDS 137.67 10688 S/A PETTY CASH FUND 45. 12 10689 CAROL B JOHNSON 13.20 10690 JOYCE MELCHER 32-00 10691 GIBBS ADVERTISING 128.25 10692 WENOELLS 87.61 10693 TREAS HENNEPIN CTY 290.00 10694 HENNEPIN CTY SHERIFF 1.29.46 10695 HENNEPIN CTY FINANCE 2, 197.50 10696 S/A NATL BANK 249803.68 10697 S/A NATIONAL BANK 5, 445. 13 10698 CITY CTY CREDIT UN 1, 807.00 10699 STATE TREAS SOC SEC 3,650.27 • 10700 M 0 I A I 20.00 10701 S/A NATL BANK 130.94 10702 AFSC LOCAL 57 150.00 10703 LOCAL 49 123.90 10704 MN TMSTRS LOCAL 320 88.00 10705 AMER BANKERS INS 113.00 10,706 THORP CREDIT 44.00 10707 MINN BENEFIT 88.48 10708 MN MUTUAL LIFE 785.00 10709 ICMA REfIREMENT 104.86 10710 CITY CTY CREDIT UN 50.00 10711 AETNA LIFF G CASUALf 381 . 50 • 10712 TWIN CITY FEDFRAL 35.00 10713 PERA 5,659.25 y 3o -Y:2 Sf ANTHONY A/P CHECK REGISTER 0 A T F CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT 10716 NW BELL TELEPHONE 63.00 10717 N S P CO 1. 213. 31 10718 ARTHURS 582.00 10719 STEPHEN KOES 156.00 10720 JOE BARSTAD 100.00 10721 INSTY—PRINTS 168.40 10722 DONALD HICKERSON 46.25 10723 MAPS.I 108.00 10724 NW BELL TELEPHONE 170.68 10725 NSP CO 519.36 10726 UNITGG RENTAL 210.00 10727 ASSOC AMER RAILROADS 10.00 10728 S/A NATL BANK 21 .752.29 10729 S/A NATL BANK 69034. 16 10730 CITY CTY CREDIT UN 19807.00 10731 COMM OF REVENUE 51003.88 10732 CITY CTY CREDIT UN 50.00 10733 AETNA LIFE E CASUALT 381.50 10734 MINN MUTUAL LIFE 785.00 10735 ICMA RETIREMENT 104.66 10736 S/A NATL BANK 150.00 10737 THORP CREDIT C THKFT 44.00 10738 TWI."d CITY FEDERAL 35.00 10739 UNITED WAY 48.00 10740 VERA 5 . 731.98 • 10741 COMM OF REVENUE 317.81 10742 RICHARD JOHNSON 9.60 ST- ANTHONY A/P CHECK REGISTER DATE 0 'CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT 10146 N SUB CABLE COMM 21000.00 10744 SUPERIOR PROD 58.00 FINAL TOTAL 94 ,200.90 # • ST ANTIICNY A/N CHECK REGISTER DATE 05- 11-82 CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT • 02964 A A BATTERY 100.98 02965 ACRU MINNESOTA INC 80. 22 02966 AMERICAN LINEN 37. 78 02967 ARSENAL SAND E GRAVE 19.00 02968 BOYER FORD 1 ,294.46 02969 BRIGHTON AUTO ELECTR 41.49 02970 BROWN PHOTO 156. 19 02971 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS 306.60 02972 BUDS WELDER SPLY E T 33.55 02973 R L CHRISTEN TRUCKIN 158.48 029T4 CROWN RUBBER STAMP C 17.11 02975 DAVIES WA,TF_R EQUIPME 15.86 • 029,76 G E G BODY SHOP 14.23 02977 GARELICK STEEL CO 36. 10 02978 GATEWAY HARDWARE 63. 11 02979 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 210.07 02980 HENNEPIN CTY FINANCE 1069.90 02981 C G HILL E SONS 429.56 02982 HOOVER WHEEL ALIGNME 17.95 02983 ITEN CHEVROLET 7.53 02984 ,1 C AUTO SUPPLY 68.86 02985 JOHNSON PAPER SUPPLY 250.53 02986 JCNES CHEMICAL 198.00 02987 J H LARSON ELECTRICA 65.21 02988 M B SUPPLY CO 34.07 02989 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT C 521. 33 02990 MELS VAN 0 LITE 52.62 Sf AN (I+ONY A/I' CHECK REGISTER DATE 0.5- 11-32 CHECK VENOOR AMOUNT • 02991 METRO WASTE CONTROL 19. 563.41 02992 MIDLAND COOP 23.08 02993 MIDWAY TRACTOR F, FCU 11.80 02994 MINN COMM 27.50 02995 MINNESOTA GAS COMPAN 19837.89 02996 MUNITECH INC 436.35 02997 NELSON OFFICE SUPPLY 2.50 02998 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDIC 15.50 02999 NORTHERN AUTOMOTIVE 32.61 03000 NORTHERN STATES POWE 3, 105.06 03001 NW BELL TELEPHONE CO 473. 12 03002 DAVE OLSON RADIATOR 38.50 03003 PENNSYLVANIA OIL CCM 40.44 • 03004 ROSEDALE CHEVROLET 14. 19 03005 SILVER LAKE CLINIC 29.00 03006 SPRING LK PK LUMBER 28.89 03007 DON STRETCHER GUNS 1 51.75 03008 TSB COMPUTER CENTER 825.56 03009 TWIN TIRES 9.75 03010 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 429.45 03011 ZFP MFG CO 20.40 03012 CATCO PARTS SRV 45.00 03013 AUTO TECH 6 EQUIP 7.00 03014 HCMELITE TEXTRON 44.95 03015 HENN CTY CHIEF POLIC 300.00 03016 LYNN PEAVEY CO 147.38 • 03017 EDDY BOkS CO 805.90 ST ANTHONY A/P CHCCK REGISTER DATE 05- 11-132 CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT 03018 GEORGE RYBOK 75.00 03019 STERLING ELECTRIC 8.65 03020 COAST MKT GROUP 198.90 03021 AUTAO TECH C EQUIP 7.00 03022 CUMMINS DIESEL SALES 1. 37 03023 A C H .CARTAGE INC 8.50 03024 ROCKET CRANE SRV 88.00 03025 OLD DOMINION BRUCH 17.56 03026 RAYMOND BJERKEBEK 15.00 03027 THOMAS R KNIGHT 50.00 03028 KIWANIS CLUB 84.25 03029 MN CITY MGT A-SSOC 25.00 03030 I NTL ASSOC FIRE CFI IE 60.00 FINAL TOTAL 349607.06 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST .FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ----------------=------------------------------------------------------- Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution May 6, 1982 Ordinance Reports-2a Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title Monthly Fire — X Other May I 1 , 1982 Informational Report-Al2ri l , 1982 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: Lee Entner, Fire Chief ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Activity Hours for the Month Fires Medicals Blood Pressure Checks 1 hr. 56 min. -9 min. 72 Speci"al Duty Inspection 2 hr. 18 min. 32 hr. 38 min. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Medical Breakdown 3 chest pain calls 1 intoxication call 1 drug reaction 1 cut hand 1 fainting 1 sick boy FISCAL IMPACT: 1 broken ankle 1 back injury 1 heart/high blood 3 heart attacks None pressure 1 sick woman 1 chlorine accident 1 personal injury accident 1 neck injury ---------------------------------------------------------------- There were 3 CPR/First Aid classes held by the Department for a total time of 11 hours 10 minutes for April . ALTERNATIVES: ---------------------------------------------------------------- None There were 3 automobile fires during the month totalling $1 ,100.00 in damage. --------------------------------------------------------------- At present we have addressed the following organizations and the outlook seems favorable for donations to assist our needs and budget. They are: RECOMMENDATION: 1 . St. Anthony Kiwanis None 2. American Legion 3. St. Anthony J.C. 's 4. St. Anthony Lions --------------------------------------------------------------- • CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS: fn ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPARTMENT COMPANY�S'PU — �'/ -�j7- - 9 D MONTHLY REPORT RUN DATE LOCATION LOSS REMARKS AT FIRST SPECIAL COMPANY NO. FIRES AID ')UTY INSPT. HRS MIN HRS IMIN HRS 1MIIN HRS MIN Pi c.K 7 G/ T r -✓.Wl9�/ � �D BAST tiDt �a'� ffvN�'/fovfc PA1?sc,46- Aar L / Q AN-o LEST Ail 0,ugsi `l 'q 15" al� 8 C L 4 <ST c p G sbv CA z p 2-LD Ph6H -C C►-o- CPR- CI, o y LID ZZ2 y-Z9S 1IT y- I NTH rsco Z I STATi ofl( M D ICAxL-- CAs,-�$r ppo,j 12 -e ner4 re tou -r W �-S s y 3� Y r I i I t ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPARTMENT PZONTHLY REPORT cot�PANY ��$o-�'1 -Q2- 90 RUN DATE LOCATION LOSS REMARKS AT FIRST SPECIAL COMPANY NO. FIRES AID .)UTY INSPT. HRS YIN HRS MIN HRS 1�IITd HRS MIrJ lqq ,aM yasCjj S L c� 3oS ;l O/ -,,X 3 ad y y-dy o GE 80 Zg v,,v cc 30 cp 0 u,,ocp M cu &4 L_ V3 ao o ,c_ oo a� ;y_a SETuP j�c,r. up J92F c4gss S c 10995 aIS a13 !Iy'a'7 fT Gf/v/rG/f� My Fo/r -0- AC t So/iorcC.?,f � J ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPARTMENT , MONTHLY REPORT C014PANY� yyO - �%��-�/ -� f90 RUN DATE LOCATION LOSS REMARKS AT FIRST SPECIAL COMPANY NO. FIRES AID ')UTY INSPT. HRS IMIN HRS IMIN HRS MIN HRS IMIN ef - 3 V jd Avt /41 e_,4 i1` g� -/ s L. -CU-r##AJ10 ACNICAL (66-CAL du i s ti- s-a S 61 G N rS I Clig 0 c, 30 / 3.309 " 19 , y-20 ZONL T� SL 1In15P�L-rco�v z �^. 1qZ -ZA ZONE 71I c►T� I N5 on1 M Z !d St 3 P L'V8LA- 1pex S y a I c. A7 CPA .30 oo a o,? 7 a ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT C014PANY � 98v - �1 - 9-A - 90 RUN DATE LOCATION LOSS REMARKS AT FIRST SPECIAL COMPANY NO. FIRES AID ')UTY INSPT o I() HRS MIN HRS MIN HRS MIN HRS MIN / 600.00 Oo oW ` Sf7ae GV - .•G� I o�� ib6 - 10 o - o - s / .70 41-43 c 0 S p& E o? 3S ' �- w Lt-i Ci7 'IS y-/S �PAGH L•9 PE„� .... F ,►T .Sfs /S S P C 2 OuE2 eLi� 3 l -/S SAO c17- GL mh;tc coPE / SS o 4Do 02 1 L- 4,00.1 30 ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT COMPANY 6y g U g -� �y Pei L o 8,-�i RUN DATE LOCATION LOSS REMARKS AT FIRST SPECIAL COMPANY NO. FIRES AID ')UTY INSPT. HRS MIN HRS MIN HRS MIN HRS MIN J /Lis I 1 `1 Ll - v p.-TN, D a0 i�o y-z N� PA'S �P -tai .Z 1 30 151 y-Z G-cy 5k)PS Rib- f-165 : Co 1SZ y-7 , -11g, Y1 pek Z va iS3 y-3 vL G v - NGGK aZ� i 4PA C.Iq E, I L tq V91 INSFUrl (AGILIT16i I NO I J.SS 'J 6,t4 SCi 0U 6 C.f r Apaoqlc A j.s P6 G I 3J S o -Gii e - - O q(O � C/2 ' O ' i %G o y- �S AA/ �✓Y A 4 * —SOOT o� CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ • Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution Reports-2b. May 5, 1982 Ordinance Date Action Requested V Formal Action/Motion Title Equipment Exchange Other Program with Neighbor- May 11 , 1982 Informational ing Cities ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: We have discussed the exchange of equipment and manpower with neighboring cities in recent months. This has actually been done on an informal basis at the Public Works Director level for some years. Now, in this time of recession/depression , cost saving measures and intergovernmental cooperation is- a necessity more than a convenience. The attached memo demonstrates initial efforts to formalize the exchange program and is presented for your information. FISCAL IMPACT: Actual dollar calculations of savings are difficult and examples are the main way of showing benefit. If Roseville were to hire a contractor to televise their sewers, the cost would be around $100.00 per hour. If St. Anthony were to need a jet rodder and hire a contractor, the cost would be similar. Since we have a sewer television setup and Roseville has a jet rodder, we can exchange the equipment for a short time at double savings. Similar savings could be shown in other similar exchanges. ALTERNATIVES : RECOMMENDATION: Staff will be proceeding with the program and hopefully expand it into other areas: We will periodically report our progress and successes/ ,ailures. 'CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : 20 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TELEPHONE 484-3311 rcosevilleMINNES.OTA SS 113 April 20, 1982 Larry Hamer City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418 Re: Equipment Exchange Between Communities Dear Mr. Hamer: On April 15, 1982. . representatives from Fridley, St. Anthony, Columbia Heights, Shoreview and Roseville met at the Roseville city hall to follow up on earlier meetings concerning the potential for communities exchanging equipment. At this meeting, it was the consensus that the concept of such equipment exhanges .was • approved and it had the potential to be mutually beneficial . The following is a brief summary of the items discussed: (1) The process should be kept as informal as possible, minimizing paper work. Effort should be made to balance the exchange of equipment, rather than sending bills, if at all possible. \ (2) Short-term imbalances were not a particular concern as long as it was reasonable to assume that within the next year or two, these would be brought back to general equality. (3) Coverage of the equipment and employees sent with it to work in the other community would continue to be provided through the insurance provided by the sending community. (4) The exchange should- be open for use by any department of the involved cities, not just the Public Works Department. (5) The number of cities involved in this format may be expanded and, in fact, it is desirable that this occur. If any additional cities wish to partici- pate, then t}iey should be encouraged to do so. If they do not turn out to be in close proximity to your particular community, or you do not actually utilize their facilities, then nothing has been hurt. Having the information available, however, to aid in the event of needed use has considerable potential . (6) Each .city should provide the oth-ar communities with a list of avail- able equipment and it 's uses. In addition, include a listing of the names, work and home phone numbers of the proper people to contact. These are people who have authorization to send out the equipment and/or manpower. April 20, 1982, page 2 • (7) In the event the piece of equipment breaks down when being used . in another city, a common sense approach to repair or maintenance should be followed. Simple maintenance techniques could be done in the shop of the city where the work is being done, but more extensive repair should be coordi- nated with the owners of the equipment. In particular, those repair items which are not specifically related to the work being done in the second city, should not be charged to that second city. Other items such as flat tires, which are directly traceable to the work being done in that location, should be absorbed by the second city. (8) If it is a burden on the city who owns the equipment to send it with an operator, because that person is needed for the day for different. work for the city; an effort should be made by the user city to send someone to replace him. This. may not always be possible because of the type of work being engaged. Manual-type functions, however, would seem to be replaceable. (9) Communiti.es should keep a general tabulation of work being done for others to ensure overall fairness; but, once again, the concept of help- ing a fellow suburb in distress or having an overall economical exchange system with several communities is deemed as being more important than having exact equality with every community. (10) In the event out-of-pocket costs for equipment parts, gasoline, etc. , are encountered by the lending community, the recipient community should provide replacements or general compensation. (11) If it is necessary to send personnel out on an overtime basis, or one which results in additional costs to the lending agency, then,they should be repaid by the user agency on a direct payroll basis or an actual oft-of-pocket expense basis, rather than adding fringe or overhead factors. If you have any corrections in this listing, or if important items were omitted, please contact me so ,that this can be provided to the various cities. If your com- munity has not as yet sent out the equipment list and person to contact lists to each of the involved communities, it is requested that you do this at once. Thank you for your cooperation and I hope this will prove to be a fruitful undertak- ing for all concerned. Yours truly, Charles V. Honchell, P.E. Public Works Director CVH/c CITY OF ST. ANTHONY . REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ • Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution Reports-2c May 5, 1982 Ordinance Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Annual Water Re- Other May 11 , 1982 Informational port-State Health Dept . ----------------------------------------------------------------------..._ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: Larry Hamer, Public Works Director ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: I rece,i v.ed the annual water report taken by the state of Minnesota State Health Department. The City received 98% out of a possible 100%. It is well known that no City receives 100% from the State. The recommended corrections on the report are almost standard in every report we have had in the past. The Water and Sewer men have to be commended in mai.ntaining the system to this high degree. I am enclosing the results of this report and if you have any questions , please ask. FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES : RECOMMENDATION: CITY NAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY Name of Water Supply PWS ID Number St. Anthony Municipal Water Supply 1270048 Street Telephone Numbers: 3301 Silver Lake Road 789-8881, City State Zip Code City' 788-7654 (shop) St. Anthony MN Operator: County District Engineer: Hennepin Metropolitan Other: 574-7437 (supt. ome) Water Superintendent Classification Plant Classification Owner Type Larry Hamer B(G) C Municipal Other Operators Classification Plant Type Plumbing Permits and ® E-1 Jim Lorbeski B Community Inspections Required Yes No Lauren McClanahan C Date of Previous Survey Date of Survey Arvid Johnson B Herman Weber B August 12, 1980 November 13, 1981 City Engineer SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS: L'I Municipal ❑School or College ❑Recreation Area ❑Mobile Home Park ❑Hotel/Motel ❑Campground ❑Company Town ❑Resort ❑Housing Development ❑Institution ❑Restaurant ❑Other Population Served Service Connections Storage Capacity: 8 000 (List Separately) 250,000 gal. elevated Design Capacity (gal/day) Average Daily Production (gal/day) 2,000,000 gal. ground 1,000,000 lopmergency Capacity (gal/day) Highest Daily Production (gal/day) 1,400,000 2,700,000 Total: 2,250,000 gallons TREATMENT WELL DATA c c c a c o U c o o c v w t a v _> o 0 0 o a o — O v c O O m c O m a J G O o� 3 > y l a y O a� ry C cz O C a� C�- J O m m E o- .° rn c ac O c E u 3 a m m E o L E _ m.` Source Name �° Q p Q cj to LL U in in H Q LL O } tj U to � 3:CO LL in O i Well 02 G E 1954 10 28.0 500 S1,Jf ne 125 25 3n Well #3 G P Dc Ap Fa a 1958 24 321 541 'M t�i 210 15 ASO Well #4 G P Dc Ap Fa V& 1960 16 467 540 Jordan 210 35 11no Well #5 G P Dc va 1961 16 387 475 Jordan 139 32 0 marks: David Engstrom Surveyed by: Richard Clark Approved by: St. Anthony Municipal water Supply - November 13, 1981 • Recommendations: 1. The continued use of well 03 which -has ungrouted construction through the Shakopee-Oneota dolomite, will depend on the continued satisfactory sanieary quality of the water. If a deterioration in water quality occurs, recon- struction or abandonment of the well will be necessary. 2. Chlorine rooms should have: a. Switches for the exhaust fan and lights located outside the chlorine room, preferably near the inspection window. 3. The primary potential health hazard to the municipal drinking water supply is the presence of cross-connections on the distribution system. All municipal systems have cross-connections and City personnel should be . constantly alert for them. Tine City should promote an aggressive cross- connection program.and designate a full time individual to provide super- vision and execution of the followings a. The detection and correction of cross--connections to unsafe water supplies. b. The education of the public on the dangers of cross-connections.. c. The installation of vacuum breakers on all threaded hose bibbs in new and old buildings. d. The replacement of defective plumbing in older buildings. • e. Periodic cross-connection inspections of potentially hazardous industries and commercial establishments. 4. The City should continue to provide the opportunity for additional training in the water supply field to all of the operators. Attendance at�.water- works operators seminars should be promote David Be Engstrom' Public Health Engin er Environmental Field Services Approved s;. Richard D. Clark, P.E., Supervisor Engineering Unit i - ii i �\1\�.vvir uCi Ai% iri C i\ OF iiLn iI Section of Water Supply and General Engineering Sanitation Safety Rating of St. Anthony Municipal Water Supply • Date November 13, 1981 Perfect As As See Recommendation No. Score Found Recom anded In Attached Report (A) Source Sanitary Safety 20 20 20 1 Adequacy of treatment Bacteriological Quality 10 10 10 Physical quality 2 2 2- Chemical quality 4 3 3 Biological quality 2 2 2 Adequacy of quantity 2 2 2 Sub-total 40 Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total 40 39 39 I (B) Prime Moving Equipment Well or intake 8 g g Pumps 7 7 7 Pipling arrangement '5 5 5 Reservoirs 7 7 7 Equipment housing 3 3 3 2 • Sub-total 30 Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total 30 30 3n (C) Distribution System Street mains 5 5 5 Building services 2 1.5 1.5 Plumbing 3 2.5 I 2.5 Hydrants 1 1 1 Storage 4 4 4 Pressure 2 2 2 Tap water quality 3 3 3 -------------------------------------•--•----------------•-------------- -------------------- --------------------------•---------------•- -------------------------•------------_---------- Sub-total 20 I Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total 20 (D) Operation and Operators Control of system 3 2 3 3 i Condition of system ! 2 2 2 Operator qualifications 5 5 5 4 - -- --------------- - ---------- ........................ ------------------•----------- ---------------•--•-•---------•-------------------- }b'-total 10 Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total 1 10 • GRAND TOTAL AND RATING 100 97 1 98 HO and upward - high degree of safety. Watchful maintenance needed.. 85 to 83 - moderately high degree of safety. Correction and maintenance program continued. 70 to 84 - poor to dangerous condition. Prompt corrective action urgently needed. 69 and lower - very dangerous condition. Fknergency measures necessary. iVIIIVIVc:JUI A LJti inn 1 MEN T Ur ritAL I H DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ANALYTICAL DATA Samples Collected By David Engstrom Report To _Metro Field Number Town, County, Etc. Sampling Point and Source of Sample a St. Anthony,. Hennepin Well #3, P.D. b Well 4 P.D F . Id Plant Effluent Wells' #3 & 4 Well #5, P.D. e Public Works Garage, S.T. f Fire Hall, S.T. This line for Lab. use only. a b c d e f Sample Number 17891 17892 17893 17894 . 17895 17896 Date Collected Time Collected Temperature of Date Received by Lab. Coliform ( M.P. N.per 1.00 ml. group }() Con. Cbmp. o organisms M. F.C.per 100 ml. I Solids Turbidity Color Total hardness as CaCO3 Alkalinity as CaCO3 pH value Iron 4005 4005 Manganese fl 77 4001 Chloride Residual Chlorine Free(Field) 07 Sulphate Fluoride Total Phosphorus Nitrite Nitrogen Nitrate Nitrogen +Nitrite 404 Methylene Blue Active Sub. as ABS Calcium as CaCO3 Sodium c Potassium Spec.Cond.ymhos/cm @ 250C.: pHs @ 50 oC. Arsenic u 1 Barium ug/1 radmillim 11q./1 Results are in milligrams per liter except as noted. Mii\ VLou i A DarAri i iviriv i ur MLAL i n DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ANALYTICAL DATA Samples Collected By David Engstrom Report To Metro Field Number Town, County, Etc. Sampling Point and Source of Sample a St. Anthony, Hennepin Johnson Nursery, S.T. b c Id e f This line for Lab. use only. LL b c d LL f Sample Number 17897 Date Collected 11-13-81 Time Collected Temperature OF Date Received by Lab. Coliform M.P. N.per 00 ml. <2.2 group Con. }1] Comp. ❑ organisms M. F.C.per 100 ml. al Solids Turbidity Color Total hardness as CaCO3 Alkalinity as CaCO3 pH value Field 7.4 Iron Manganese Chloride Residual Chlorine Free (Field) 0.6 Sulphate Fluoride Total Phosphorus Nitrite Nitrogen Nitrate Nitrogen Methylene Blue Active Sub. as ABS Calcium as CaCO3 Sodium Potassium Spec.Cond.ymhos/cm @ 250C. pHs @ 50 oC. Results are in milligrams per liter except as noted. X - VOLATILE HALOG-ENATED Budget No. HYDROCARBONS IN WATER Code No. C llec.ted By ��/G�i�p/Y� _ Report To / Tr�y Collection Tovn/Count7 Sampling Point Date -and Time I0:I O An^ A) B) LX/9/-� �4- PT,� 10:Z,0A 10,30-AM V my r E) Date Received i /� Aj 7903 B)? 90 y C/ 7 90S / 7Q�60 E) Methylene Chloride`- <I-0 <J-(7 Trichlorofluoror:.ethane < 1,1-Dichloroethylene° < I, 1,1-Dichlcroethzre° 0. < I.O V-D Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene• < I,D <1.0 Chloroform' (I.D < I.0 <I•D < I ,�D ,2-Dichlo:oethare° <I.L�. < I.O I.D 0-0 •d 1,1,1-Trichloroethane° ! < 1.0 LD 0 -0 .d Carbon Tetrachloride <�.� f�,D <I.b < I.0 _. Bromodichloromethane' <I b <-/.D <(b < I 1,2-Dichloropropane' I,D 1.D 1,1,2-Trichloroethylene° < I < 1,1,2-Trichloroethane° D 0-D-D < 1.0 <I.O Dibromochloromethane° < I < I,D 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether' �),� �l,D < 1.D 0,0 Bromof orm' <I I < I.p < I.p 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane° < <f,D <q,0 D <y.0 Tetrachloroethylene° < 14.0 <LI.O <y.D < 9.0 Chlorobenzene• < I p < I.D 1,_i.-Dichlorobenzene° 1,2-Dichlorobenzene* 1,4-Dichlorobenzene° peck q& deird", 1Jdr A i r,3 °Fh O.0 1r,, D>• t�� l �? f CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution May 6, 1982 Ordinance Reports-2d Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Liquor Operation Other May 11 , 1982 Informational Sales Summary-Jan.-April ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager ------------------------7------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Attached .i is the sales summary for the months of January - April for the Liquor Operation. Combined sales are down nearly $22,000 in the first four months. Most of the decline is the result of a 13.5% drop in sales at the on-sale operation at the Stonehouse. As you may note, the Speakeasy is up 27.6% for the period and both operations at Apache are up from last year. FISCAL IMPACT: The good news is that according to preliminary figures, even though combined sales for January, February and March are down by about $16,800 compared with 1981 , the net profit is up ap.proximately $6 ,000 to about $99,000 for the first quarter. The full quarterly report will be available at the next meeting , but this definitely-shows that our profitability was up sharply over the 1st quarter of last year even in light of lower sales figures. Ray Nelson and his people are to be commended. ALTERNATIVES: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Informational . • CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : T �Lr,� � ,l .1/I�L�C.I�• r SALES SUMMARY APRIL 1982 STORE ONE STORE. Two COMBINED ON SALE OFF SALE SPEAKEASY ON SALE OFF SALE SALES - APR IL 182 - 211 ,959.88 39,767.06 73,831 .10 4,617,34 24,098044 69,645.94 SALES - APRAL 181 216,970,39 46,676.27 74,638031 3,942.53 22,320074 69,392654 INCREASE 5,010.51* 6,909.21# 807.21* 674.81 1 ,777.70 253.40 INCREASE % 2..13%* 14080%* 1.08% 17,12% 7.97% o.36% SALES — 4 Mos. 182 786,291 .97 148,96o.58 271 ,086.45 17,899.37 84,742,51 263,603.06 5ALES — 4 Mos. '81 808,122.32 172,164.86 277,278,,90 14,024,19 83,606.89 261 ,047,48 INCREASE t 21 ,830,35* 23,204,28* 6,192045* 3,875.18 1 ,135.62 2,555058 INCREASE %, 2.70%* 13.48%* 2.23%* 27,63% 1 .36% 0.980 * DECREASE I� Agenda Item Number Reports-3a Status Informational MEMORANDUM DATE: May 6 , 1982 TO: Dave Childs , City Manager Department Heads Ron Berg,- Administrative Assistant Lila Johnson, Billing Clerk FROM: Connie Kroeplin, Secretary SUBJECT: Notes on May 5 , 1982 Staff Meeting - --------------------------------------------------------------------- The meeting opened at 9: 35 A.M. Those present were : Dave Childs , Ray Nelson, Lee Entner, Don Hickerson, Ron Berg, Carol Johnson , Larry Hamer and Connie- Kroeplin. No one was absent. Mr. Childs opened the meeting with discussions on some of the items which will be on the Council' s May 11th agenda. (1) The B. Preussner parking problem. Mr. Childs will recommend no parking signs be put up whenever Skycroft will be swept. Mr: Hamer thought this recommendation might be misconstrued as being "selective" and suggested he (Mr. Hamer) could meet with Mrs . Kelly (Mr. Preussner' s neighbor) to tell her when the street will be swept. The least acceptable alternative would be to pass a law. (.2) Sroga Service Station. . Mr. Childs and Mr. Hamer have met with Mr. and Mrs— Sroga regarding the neighbors ' complaints . They both came .away from that conversation feeling Mr. Sroga intends to be as cooperative as much as is economically feasible. Mr. Sroga stated he wishes to expand the holding area and also erect a cedar fence along the front of the lot. He has already ceased to sell cars , which he stated he would do. (3) Craig Morris . The Irrevocable Letter of Credit has been cashed in. The fence has not yet been constructed as of May 6 , 1982 . (.4) Don's Amusement Enterprises , Inc. Chief Hickerson will discuss security and any problems which could arise with Ruth Welch of Apache Plaza. C5) The bids for the St. Anthony Boulevard Bridge project will be opened the latter part of May. It is anticipated work can then begin by the middle or latter part of June. Sunset Memorial Cemetery is requesting permission to construct a roadway under the bridge and parallel to the railroad tracks . This w veld allow • them to close off their two accesses at the intersection of St. Anthony Boulevard and Highway 88. -2- • (6) The last management consultant to be interviewed for the Kenzie Terrace H.R.A. project (Northwest Associated Consultants , Inc. ) will be present at 7 :00 P.M. Ray Nelson will proceed with the purchase of a wide-screen video television system for the Stonehouse . Lee Entner has sent out a memo regarding the procedures which will be used in the event of severe weather. He felt this was necessary because the warning siren at 35th and Silver Lake Road is still inoperable. The siren has been sent to be repaired. There was another lengthy discussion on the City' s branch chipping program. The program will be a week to two weeks behind because it appears that a resident included a piece of iron with his branches and as a consequence the entire - drum and bearing structure was damaged severely (:about $1,000 to repair) . Staff proposes that the branch program not be budgeted for in 1983 . Mr. Childs reminded staff that at the Christmas party interest was expressed to have a City staff picnic this summer. A June 27th date was tentatively agreed upon and plans will proceed. He would also like to begin acknowledging years of- service City personnel have accomplished (:5 , 10 , 15, 20 , 25 , etc. ) . Meeting adjourned at 11:15 A.M. cjk • Agenda Item No. Reports-3b Status : Informational. • MEMORANDUM DATE: April 30 , 1982 _ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David Childs , City Manager SUBJECT: Proposed Surface Water Management Plan I attended the Metro Council Public .Hearing regarding the proposed surface water management plan. During the lZ hours of the after- noon session the following cities/groups spoke against the plan because of its financial considerations and its efforts to exceed the requirements of the newly passed state law. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Cities of New Hope, Bloomington, Moundsview, . Plymouth, Brooklyn Park, Oakdale , Eagan, Minnetonka, Coon Rapids , Wayzata Dakota .County 5 Watershed Districts Fred Silberman - Professor of Water Resources Management, University of Minnesota Speaking in favor of the plan were : The League of Women Voters The Ramsey/Washington -Watershed District The attached letter has been submitted which I believe summarizes the feelings of the City Council as I perceive them. It appears at this time that there is a good chance that the Metro Council will amend their plan to conform with state law, but I have an uneasy feeling that the Metro Council is planning to make a strong pitch to amend the law in the next legislative session. We should oppose those efforts if they materialize. DMC/cjk • 0� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES• 3301 SILVER LAKE ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418 • PHONE 789-8881 CITY OF sT anTHong May 4 , 1982 Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul , MN 55101 Re : Public Hearing on Surface Water Management Plan (to be entered into the hearing record) Dear Sirs , The City of St . Anthony took a strong position in opposition • to the recently adopted State Surface Water Management Act (Chap- ter 509 ) . Our opposition to the law was , of course , contrary to the position of the Metropolitan Council in advocating even more stringent regulations . The State Legislature is in a position of mediator between these conflicting interests . We feel that the resulting legislation at least repreSenL_o a sincere effort by our elected officials to provide an overall compromise which addresses the issues fairly and reasonably . Chapter 509 has become law and the City of St. Anthony must abide by it. We feel that the Metro Council is also honor-bound to do the same . We cannot accept efforts to "enhance" the law and we go on record strongly opposing any language in your draft plan which does not conform strictly to the State law. We are a community about 3 square miles in size which is about 95% developed. We are located in two counties (Hennepin and Ramsey) , two Congressional Districts (the 5th and 6th) and in two watershed districts (Rice Creek and the Middle Mississippi River) . Because we are fully developed , we find that efforts to require further planning and regulation are of limited benefit and apparently unlimited cost. We are unable to resolve this obvious conflict between cost and benefit , and continue to oppose ongoing efforts • to "simplify" the planning and implementation processes . Metropolitan Council May 4 , 1982 Page 2 We will also strongly oppose efforts to amend the law in the next legislative session and respectfully request that you not waste precious taxpayers dollars mounting such an effort. Sincerely , Robert Sundland Mayor RS/cjk CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution Reports-3c May 6, 1982 Ordinance Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Status-Hennepin Other County Public Safety May 11 , 1982 Informational . Radio System ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Considerable discussion has taken place in re- cent months and years about emergency. dispatching in Hennepin County. As you may be aware, over half of the cities -in the County utilize the County for dispatching. A substantial number, . however, -have their own dispatching operations and any discussion of a total county-wide system has met with severe opposition. The attached memo indicates that for the time being, we will not be charged for dis- patching and describes some system improvements which we find very welcome. FISCAL IMPACT: We have been concerned, in the past, that the County would start charging for dispatching services. Their action not to charge the cities for the operation is a welcome financial relief.. ALTERNATIVES : N/A RECOMMENDATION: The proposed procedural and operations changes are very desirable and Commissioner Salverda should be informed about our appreciation for these developments. CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : 0A..L*A rn ,ad&� OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR r Center A-2300 Government Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 FW1:MK1VP1N ij U May 3, 1982 Mr. David M. Childs St. Anthony City Manager 3301 Silver Lake Road Minneapolis, MN 55418 Dear Mr. Childs: The purpose of this letter is to serve as a progress report on the upgrading of the Hennepin County Public Safety radio communications system that is operated by the Sheriff's Department. The Hennepin County Board Resolution (82-3-84R) that established emergency public safety radio communications as a County function and responsibility, without charge for emergency dispatching services, was passed on March 16, 1982. Since that time, members of the Sheriff's Department, Information Services Department and the Office • of Planning and Development have been meeting to provide preliminary implementation plans for the various directives in the Resolution. Specific progress that has been accomplished to date includes the following items: • In an attempt to eliminate the congestion on the main law enforcement dispatch radio channel(155.61 MHz), the County has been divided into a North dispatch zone and a South dispatch zone, with Highway 55 serving as the approximate North-South dividing line. The south dispatch zone will continue to use 155.61 MHz as the dispatch channel; the north zone will use 154.8 MHz as the dispatch channel. Both segments will use mobile relay (repeater) type of operation, a network of satellite receivers and a receiver voting system. All base equipment is now installed and operational; most of the mobile radios are also installed and operational. Captain Donald Vodegel of the Sheriffs Radio Division advises that operational tests on the new north repeater channel will begin by June 1, 1982. When the second dispatch zone is fully operational (in a few months), the radio traffic load on 155.61 MHz will be cut in half. This impending improvement will do much to eliminate the serious problem of overcrowding on the main public safety radio dispatch channel. 9 As directed by the Board Resolution, representatives of the Sheriff's Radio Division and the Communications Division of the Information Services Department are developing an Action Plan to remove administrative radio traffic from the main public safety dispatch channel, which is intended to further reduce congestion on the main • radio dispatch channel(s). HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer -2- • The process for the development of a Users Advisory Committee for the County radio network is being drafted for municipal review including recommendations for the determination of policy, membership and duties of the committee. County staff will be reviewing this process with municipalities in the near future. • Procedures are being developed to remove most of the Sheriff's Department communications from the existing car-to-car channel (Channel Two, 155.805 MHz), thereby eliminating much of the competition on the frequency. I have directed staff to provide you with this.type of periodic progress report on the public safety communication, upgrading project. If you have questions about this report or about any aspect of the project, please contact Mr. Roy Pasquarette at 348-3190 for additional details. Y rs truly, -. Dale A. Ackmann County Administrator cc: Police Chief Don Hickerson . Hennepin County Commissioners Sheriff Don Omodt Agenda Item No. Reports-3.e Status Informational • association of metropolitan municipalities NOTICE OF ANNUAL IEETING DATE: Wednesday, May 26, 1982 PLACE: Sheraton Inn - Northwest I-94 & Hwy. 52 Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 5: 30 to 6: 30 P.M. 6: 30 to 7: 30 P.11. 7: 30 P.M. Social Hour Buffet Dinner Annual Business Meeting (sponsored by Miller Entree: & Schroeder Munici- Roast Round of Beef pals, Inc. ) and Baked Turkey COST: $15. 00 per person BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order -- James Krautkremer, President . 2. Introduction of -Guests and Retiring Board Members. 3. Keynote address: Representative John Brandl , Chairman of the Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Governance. "What are we learning from the study of Metropolitan Governance". 4. Annual Report : President James Krautkremer. 5. Election of Officers and Directors - 'Dick Asleson, Nominating Committee Chairperson (Committee report enclosed). 6. Comments: 'President Elect 7. Announcements. ' 8. Other Business. 9. Adjournment . PLEASE NOTE: A. Each City should send at least one delegate to cast its vote. Citie: are encouraged, however, to send as many additional representatives as possible. Spouses and guests welcome. B. Dinner reservations must be confirmed to Carol Williams at the AMM • office (227-56.00) by noon on Monday, May 24th. C. This notice is being sent to Mayors, Delegates and City Administrati Officials. 300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street,st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222-2861 • May 5, 1982 TO: Member City Officials FROM: Dick Asleson, Chairperson,. Nominating Committee RE: Nominating Committee Report Pursuant to Article IX, Section 3 of the By-Laws, a Nominating Committee was appointed by the AMM Board of Directors on Harch 4, 1982. The Committee has completed its work and has nominated the below listed persons for consideration at the Annual Meeting S on May 26th. For President : Mary Anderson, Councilmember, Golden Valley For Vice-President : Jack Irving, Manager, Crystal For Board of Directors: Two-Year Terms- (8 to be elected) : Ron Backes, Councilmember, St. Louis Park Bill Barnhart , Senior Planner, Minneapolis Jerry Dulger, Manager, Anoka Laura Fraser, Councilmember, Lake Elmo Jim Miller, Manager, Minnetonka Jackie Slater, Alderman, Minneapolis James Spore, Manager, Burnsville Bob Sundland, Mayor, St. Anthony One-Year Terms (2 to be elected) : Gary Bastiab , Councilmember, Maplewood Neil Peterson, Councilmember, Bloomington * Additional candidates may be nominated by any voting delegate from the floor at the Annual Meeting. (over) i Member City Officials Hay 5, 1982 Page 2 Board members whose terms expire May, 1983: Greg Blees, Budget Director, St . Paul Bea Blomquist , Mayor, Eagan Bill Sandberg, Mayor, North St . Paul Dennis Schneider, Councilmember, Fridley Joanne Showalter, Councilmember, St. Paul Bob Thistle, Manager, Coon Rapids . Members of the Nominating Committee: Dick 'Asleson, Administrator, Apple Valley Tim Flaherty, Legislature Liaison, Minneapolis Jack Irving, Manager, Crystal Don Masterson, Mayor, Spring Lake Park Carl Meissner, Administrator, Cottage Grove Connie Morrison, Councilmember, Burnsville Bill Sandberg, Mayor, North St. Paul Tom Spies, Councilmember, Bloomington • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION I Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution New Business-2 May 6, 1982 Ordinance Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Sunset Memorial Other Park-St. nt ony ou e- May 11 , 1982 vard -Bridge Underpass Request i ------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT_: Mr. Fred Ossanna III of Sunset Memorial Park met with arry Hamer and myself to discuss a proposal to construct a roadway parallel: to the Burlington Northern Railway under-the proposed St. Anthony Boulevard Bridge. We -have checked with ,our engineers andmthe State and no problem is fore- seen. Sunset will bear all costs for the change and construction of the roadway will allow them to close off their gates at Highway 88 and- St. Anthony Boulevard, j thus alleviating a serious traffic problem. See attached letter and sketch plan. I - FISCAL IMPACT: All extra costs to -be- borne by Sunset. s i ALTERNATIVES: I i f I RECOMMENDATION: Staff seeks a motion to approve the change order and to proceed with an agreement between the applicant and the City regarding the costs. 1 i i I CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS: i (y) C��-� I f I l � I Selection You Desire-Service You Demand • Chapel & Mausoleum ° . Complete Crematory & Niches • • Burial Vaults & Memorial Markers MEMORIAL PARK The Council of the City of St, Anthony Village City Hall 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony Village, MN 55418 May 5th, 1982 Re: A Request for an Easement under the Proposed Burlington Northern Overpass Bridge, parallel to the Burlington Northern Tracks. Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: Please allow me to introduce myself: I am Fred Ossanna, III, Vice President and General Manager of Sunset Memorial Park located at 2250 St, Anthony Blvd, across from the Francis Gross Golfcourse. The purpose of this letter is to request the granting by St, Anthony Village to Sunset Memorial Park of an easement under the proposed railroad overpass bridge which would parallel the tracks operated by Burlington Northern Railroad on the • northern side of those tracks. The easement would not cross or impinge upon the right-of-way of those tracks, Two goals come to mind at Sunset in making this request: First, to connect the two separate sections of the Park; the older section to the south with the newer section to the north of the Boulevard, which would eliminate delays and dangerous exposure of funeral processions crossing between the two sections via the entryways located adjecent the traffic island at the intersection of the Boulevard and Minnesota Highway #88; Second, to close off and remove these above-mentioned entryways in order to gain more control of traffic through the Park and to increase overall security on the grounds. I have been in contact with both Mr. Larry Hamer, Director of Public Works, and Mr. Steve Campbell, P,E. , Short-Elloitt-Hendrickson, Inc. , the consulting engineers retained by St. Anthony Village, to determine the feasibility of such an easement. Preliminary inspections of the old bridge, the railroad right-of- way, Sunset' s grounds and the blueprints of the proposed new bridge have indicated that no engineering or construction problems would exist. The project of connecting the two Park sections, it was felt, should phase in smoothly with the construction of the bridge and would in no way delay or necessitate any change of the bridge construction as now anticipated by the State of Minnesota, Furthermore, Sunset Memorial Park has retained Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. • as consulting engineers for this project in order to insure that continuity exists in the phasing of the total bridge project and the execution of the requested easement, 2250 St. Anthony Blvd. N.E., Minneapolis, MN 55418 (612) 789-3596 page two i We, Mr. Hamer, Mr. Campbell and myself, see several advantages accruing to St. Anthony Village in the granting of the easement, and thus allowing the connection of the two Park sections: First, the two entryways at the intersection of the Boulevard and Highway 88 would be permanently closed and removed, thus eliminating a very hazardous multiple-access condition currently existing at that intersection; Second, our funeral processions would always be using the main entrance of Sunset Memorial Park, thus allowing a consistent routing and hence better traffic flow and, perhaps, more parking allocation; Third, Sunset would assume all costs of construction involved with the easement and connecting roadways, and all costs involved with the future maintenance of the bridge area adjacent to that easement; Fourth, Sunset would gladly cooperate in all ways possible with St. Anthony Village in the phase of the project concerned with the widening and beautifcation of the Boulevard and its right-of-way. On behalf of Sunset Memorial Park, thank you for your audience. I am Si ereI,y, i///r,�? w� - /" • F e AI �sanna� ; 111 Vice President & General Manager FAO/nc CC: Mr. Larry Hamer, Director Department of Public Works Village of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony Village, MN 55418 • A.A �-t �p8 , Ar ' a �y 0, -O N r 10 n n c .p N s i .... Z9 ��7: :::,.;rig::;::. � ' � +�''Yi.•p;rr:•. .gyp t•1%Ir Z In a J . 00 • SA a CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION -----------=------------------------------------------------------------ • Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution May 5, 1982 X Ordinance Unfinished Business-2j Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title Proposed Other May 11 , 1982 Fence Ordinance ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Childs , City Manager ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: The attached ordinance contains the amend- ments approved at the April 27, T982 City Council meeting. As you recall , considerable discussion took place regarding this matter. Please call me prior to the meeting if you have any questions. • FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Pass the ordinance in its present form.. 2. Make changes you desire. 3. Decide not to pass any ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the second reading of the Fence Ordinance as presented (includes amendments made on April 27th) . CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : • ORDINANCE 1982-003 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO FENCES; REQUIRING BUILDING PERMITS ; REGULATING LOCATIONS ; PROHIBITING CERTAIN FENCES; AMENDING THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING A SECTION THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter III of the 1973 Code of Ordinances is amended to add a section to read as follows: 340 Fences. 340: 05 Building Permits Required. A building permit shall be required for the construction or alteration of a fence, and for any additions to a fence. The permit shall be obtained in the name of the owner of the property on which the fence is or will be located. Application shall be made on forms provided by the City, and the applicant shall provide the Building Inspector with a set of plans and specifications for the fence . Permit fees shall be paid in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. • 340. 10 Requirements. Subd. 1. Location. Any fence constructed or altered after the effective date of this ordinance shall be located entirely upon the private property of the owner to whom the building permit was issued, and ownership of the permit shall pass with ownership of the property. The fence shall be set back a distance from the owner ' s property line sufficient to avoid encroachment onto adjoining private or public property or public right of way. Subd. 2. Abutting. Public Property. If a fence is or is to be adjacent to a street, alley, public right of way or other public property, the City may require the applicant for the permit to locate and mark the property line abutting the public property by having a registered surveyor place permanent survey pins or stakes on the property line . If the survey information is not available and • the applicant elects not to establish the property line by survey, the permit shall not be issued unless the applicant signs an affidavit stating that the applicant is the owner of the premises upon which the fence exists or is to be located. Subd. 3. No fence shall be over 6 feet in height, and no fence in a front yard shall be over 4 feet in height. Height shall be measured from the natural grade. Subd. 4 . No fence along a public street shall be constructed or altered sous to visually obstruct the view from a vehicle on that street of approaching traffic on that street or another street. Section 340: 15 Construction and Maintenance. Every fence shall be constructed in a substantial manner and of substantial material, reasonably suitable for the purpose for which the fence is intended. Every fence shall be maintained in a condition of reasonable repair and shall not by reason of age, decay, accident, or otherwise, be allowed to become or remain in a state of disrepair so as to be or tend to be a nuisance to the injury of the public or any abutting property. Any fence which is dangerous by reason of its construction or state of disrepair or is otherwise injurious to public safety, health or welfare is hereby declared to be a nuisance. . Section 340: 25 Prohibitions. It shall be unlawful for any person to construct and maintain or allow to be constructed or maintained upon any property located within the limits of the City of St. Anthony any barbed wire fence or any fence which is charged or connected with electrical current in a manner as to transmit current to a person or animal which might come in contact with the fence . Section 340 : 30 Penalty. Violation of this Ordinance shall be a penal offense and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable as in this code provided for each such offense. Each day that the violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. -2- • First Reading : April 27 , 1982 Second Reading : May 11 , 1982 Adopted.: Robert Sundland, Mayor ATTEST: Carol B. Johnson, Clerk Published in the St. Anthony Bulletin on , 1982 . • -3- I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ iDate Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution May 5, 19.82 Ordinance Unfinished Bus i Hess-3 Date 'Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title Consideration of X Other May 11 , 1982 Insurance Bids f ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Mayor and Councilmen I FROM: David M. Childs , City Manager --------------------------------------------------------------- ---- SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: As you recal 1 , we advertised for bids on City insurance to be opened on Monday, May 10, 1982 at 10:00 A.M. As of the date of this memo I expect only two major bidders (the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust and the Home Insurance Company) . • FISCAL IMPACT: Competitive bidding of insurance can and has resulted in substan- tial savings. Another factor which can have along-term effect on stabilizing costs is to do just the opposite and inform bidder that if costs remain reasonable, we do not expect to rebid for three years. We are attempting to use both of '\these strategies in our process this year. ALTERNATIVES : To be submitted May 1 1 , 1982. i i RECOMMENDATION: To be submitted May 1 1 , 1982. • CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : t PART A CALL FOR BIDS CITY OF ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA INSURANCE Notice is hereby given that sealed bids will be received by the City of St. Anthony , until 10:00 A.M. , May 10, 1982, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud . Bids are being requested on the following insurance : (,l ) Workmen ' s Compensation (2) Property Insurance ' (3) Inland Marine (4) Crime Coverage (5) Comprehensive General Liability (6) Comprehensive Automobile Liability (a) Liability (b) Collision (7) Umbrella Liability (8) Public Employees Blanket Bond (9) Boiler and Machinery (10) Liquor Liability in accordance with specifications on file with and available from the City • Manager' s Office, City Hall , 3301 Silver Lake Road , St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418. All bids shall be submitted on the forms provided, together with the specifications . A specimen copy of the policy and endorsements must be included with all proposals . The alternate must be submitted with the proposal . \ The City of St . Anthony reserves the right to waive any informalities lin the bids ; to reject any all bids or parts of bids and to make any award which it considers to be in the hest interest of the City. It is not required that all coverages be with the same company. Quotations for additional coverages or policy extensions will be considered , but these costs should be indicated separately. The underwriting , loss data and other information furnished by the City has been compiled from statistics and files which we believe to be reliable. The City reserves the right , however, to amend values and report exposure changes . Any additional information provided to one bidder will be provided to all bidders. It is the intent of the City of St. Anthony to establish a long term relationship with its agent or broker and insurance companies. The City also intends to manage its insurance and maintain positive loss control measures in all operations. Should cost and service be considered satisfactory, the City does not plan a sub- sequent bid procedure for at least three years. m, David M. Childs City Manager i - CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION -------------------=---------------------------------------------------- • Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution May S, 1982 Ordinance Unfinished Business-4 Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion TitleBernhard Preussner Other May 11 , 1982 Parking Concerns ---------------------------------------------------------------•--------- TO: Mayor and Councilmen F ROM: David M. . Childs , City Manager ------------------------------------------------------------------------ .. SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Staff has reviewed the request from Mr. Preussner to rectify the parking problem in front of his home at 3209 Skycroft. He has submitted the attached copy of the City of Minneapolis Ordinance with respect to parking. He states that the law is on the books , but is enforced only when a complaint is received . ® FISCAL IMPACT: N/A ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Post signs on Skycroft in advance of sweeping. This will -be a little extra work and would not solve the problem the rest of the time when sweeping . is not imminent. It does, however, avoid passage of an ordinance. 2. Pass an ordinance similar to Minneapolis' . A determination would then have to be made about selective enforcement. 3. Let the neighbors resolve the problem between themselves. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that alternative #1 be chosen for this summer. The. signs could have a longer term effect than one day and we feel that it is a good compromise between the two parties. .CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : •roar'^' � .. . ... - - .. y4� § 478.100 TRAFFIC CODE (q) No person shall move a vehicle not owned by such person into any prohibited area or away from a curb such distance as is unlawful; (r) No person shall, for camping purposes, leave or park a house trailer on or within the limits of any street or highway or on any street or highway right-of-way, except where signs are erected designating the place as a campsite; (s) No person shall park a vehicle so as to block a fire escape or the exit from any building; (t) No person shall stop or park a vehicle on a street or highway when directed or ordered to proceed by any peace officer invested by law with authority to direct, control or regulate traffic; (u) At any place on public property which is not at the time o �• pen for the use of vehicular traffic; (v) At any place where official signs prohibit stopping standing or parking; (w) On any portion of a street or highway \ property between the roadway and ab ttin other public g ProPQrtY; (x) Between any adjacent roadways which are part of a street or highway; (Y) At any place on any pathway, sidewalk area for pedestrians or other portion of any public property which is not intended for the use of vehicles; (z) At any place where marked and signed fire lanes have been established by authorization of the city council. (Code 1960, As Amend., § 411.090; Ord, of 9.28-73, § 2) State law reference-rSimilar Provisions, Ivi.S. § 169.34. 478.100. General time limits for parking. (a) No person shall park a vehicle or permit it to stand u street in the congested zone fora Pon any 81�Y (60) minutes during Period of time longer than 6:00 p.m., except on Sundays and legabetween ys. a.m. and 3331 Will lip P}4 § 478.100 MINNEAPOLIS CODE (b) No person shall park a vehicle or permit it to stand upon any street for a period of time longer than sixty (60) minutes between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of any day, except physicians on emergency calls. (c) No person in charge of a vehicle shall park or permit it to stand upon any street or highway in the city for more than two (2) consecutive hours, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., unless otherwise designated on signs erected and installed. (d) No person shall park a vehicle or permit it to stand upon any street or highway in the city for more than six (6) consecutive hours between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m., except in an emergency or unless otherwise designated on signs erected and installed. (e) For the purpose of the regulations relating to limited parking, any vehicle moved a distance of not more than two (2) blocks during the limited parldng period shall be deemed to have remained stationary. (Code 1960, As Amend., § 411.130) Annotation—Code of Ordinances, section 411.130(c), from which the above section was derived, prohibiting parking in public streets for more than two hours between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., has a valid public purpose. • State u. Perry, 130 N.W. 2d 343 (1964). 478.110. No-stopping zone. No person shall stop or halt a vehicle, even momentarily, in any place on any street or highway where official signs prohibit stopping, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the direction of a police officer or traffic-control sign or signal. (Code 1960, As Amend., § 411.150) 478.120. Removal of vehicles for street mainte- nance, snow removal. Whenever the city engineer or any of his assistants shall find it necessary, for purposes of facilitating street maintenance operations, such as the removal of snow, ice or street wastes, to move any vehicle standing on any highway, the city engineer, or assistants, 3332 �� CITY OF ST. ANTHONY REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution Unfinished Business-5 May 6, 1982 Ordinance Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Sroga Service Other May 11., 1982 Station - License ------------------------------------------------------------------••----- TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Ch.i l ds , City Manager ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - SUMMARY OF SUBJECT: Attached is a memo regarding the Sroga Station _ and its visual appearance. Also attached are copies of minutes regarding dis- cussions about the original construction of the fence. It appears that the license cannot be denied on the basis of those discussions and that his recent assurances are such that , if he does what he proposes to do, there should be no future problems with this property. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Approve the license and review progress. in the fall when the towing license expires. 2. Deny the license (not an action which would be very legally defensible) . 3. Table the license for more- study and discussion. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 . CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : a • MEMORANDUM DATE : April 30 , 1982 TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David Childs , City Manager SUBJECT: Sroga Station --------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thursday , _ April 29 , 1982 , Larry Hamer and myself met with Mr. and Mrs . Joe Sroga regarding the visual appearance of their service station on Stinson Boulevard. The conversation lasted approximately 1 hour and 20 minutes . I found the Sroga' s very cooperative and anxious to learn what they can do to satisfy recently voiced concerns about their business . We reviewed damage caused by the City during construction of the sewer- diversion last fall and made arrangements to fulfill the responsibility of the City regarding repairs to the service station and adjacent properties : During this discussion we also discussed the possible enlargement of the automobile holding area which would allow parking of some of the tow trucks behind the fence as well as all towed cars and, if space is available , those cars owned by local people which have been dropped off for repairs . We discussed concerns about advertising cars for sale on the front boulevard. He stated that this is something that he allows his customers to do and does not make any money from it. He agreed not to continue the -practice in the future . Mr. Sroga intends to paint the station later this summer and to install a board on board cedar-type fence across the front of the storage lot. Ground disturbed by the City during construction last fall will be re-seeded by Mr. Sroga in the next few weeks and he increased his clean up activity to improve general appearance of the property . He states that because he lives across the back from the property he is also concerned about its appearance and will continue to try to improve it. Because of high interest rates , Mr. Sroga will be unable to install the new fencing until July or August, but states that he fully intends to do so. I recommend that the service station license be granted and that Mr. Sroga be given time to comply . If adequate progress is not completed through the summer , the towing license is up for renewal in September. I am currently researching our position with respect to the license and will report to you in the near future . I believe that Mr. Sroga is a man of his word and we probably can expect that things will be much better by September. DMC/cj k C • November 12 , 1976 'O: PLANNINr, BOARD MEMBERS ROM: JIM FORNELL, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Sroga Service Station met with Mr. Sroga earlier this week and he reviewed his plans o improve the appearance of his station at 3201 Stinson Boulevard. e said he intended to extend the fenced area behind his station o the south and east, as shown on the enclosed sketch. The south ense line would line up with the south property line of his home t 3204 Roosevelt; the east fence line would be alone the east eda_ e f his service station property extended parallel with Stinson oulevard to the south property line of his home . Some of the fenced rea would encroach upon a City owned sewer utility easement in St. nthony Boulevard, vacated but he is willing to remove the fence as eeded. It would be almost impossible for him to fence a reasonable rea for storage without encroaching on the easement due to the rregular shape of the lot. The fencing on the south and east sides ill be opaque slot board of a six foot height, minimum: '\ The north nd east sides will be chain link for security reasons . r. Sroaa also intends to sod. or seed the area tc, the south of the fenced area, leaving only a small area for cars -ith leaking gas tanks or oil leaks . All other vehicles except those being worked on ould be stored in the fenced area. He also said he painted the % station recently and will be making other minor future improvements as his time and finances permit. . JF/b j p • 3 ivixtr - DN[1 ATLANTIC 3002 O URTH AV: J . E. HILL NuE So - RESIDENCE Lo COLONY BLDG. CIVIL ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR 7138 FIFTH AVE 6o, ■[OICT[w10 YNO[■4-- Of TN[ •T,T[ OF NINNI/OT. T[L[wMON[I REGENT 7O�[ LICINw[D•T OND'N,NCI Or CITY OI YINNI,wOLI[ MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA f ifira tr ... .,� IRON W�r G rM;c s�• '• 3 • � w - - 35 a 000 4J 'n 3z L 1 W i V � 1 / 6+ S1 A board c? X\' opigut A$ r 0p. Pa ,rklih S �.�� , $v C/O 3.6 I Hereby U �c an d qirti fy 5 C'X''That the above plat is a true and correct plat of a survey of: Lob 9 Mook 3 Clark & King o 6 F-mm onin GRrd@ae T 1 i, an addition to Minneapolis, Minn. as surveyed by F me this 16 day of A.D. 194 i October w[GOr[w[o ,NO•y.r�TM , CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Nover^ber 16 , 1976 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bowerman at 7 : 35 P.1-i.. Present for roll call : Marks , Letourneau, Hiebel , Bowerman and Johnson Absent: Rymarchick and Cowan Also Present: Jim Fornell, Administrative Assistant Motion by Mr. Hiebel .and. seconded by Mr. Marks to approve the ninutes of the October 26 , 1976 Board meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Dick Krier, Planning Director of the City of Richfield, illustrated through a slide presentation the manner in which Richfield has planned to redevelop the deteriorating Lyndale-Hub commercial and residential neighborhood. He gave the steps taken to achieve a workable mix of commercial. and residential development with adequate buffering between the two. The planner discussed with the Board similar problems to those the City has encountered in the upgrading of the St. Anthony Shopping Center which Richfield has overcome in the five years they have been working on the problem.. d t was his contention that such a redevelopment can only be achieved through the involvement of business and residents alike in the planning at all stages. He said the impetus for the redevelopment had come from the banking interests and senior citizens groups as well as owners of residential properties which were losing value with the deterioration of the commercial development. The nucleus of the development will be a promotional department store with an entertainment center as a drawing card and HRA financing. :.Jeff Nielsen of Gay Realty spoke of the plans of Trucker-Sheehy Con- struction to build a 26 , 2)0 square foot warehouse/office building on lots 3 and 4 , Block 3 , St.. Anthony Office Park Addition. Mr. Nielsen said , however, that the only tenant who had been lined up, a John Deere, Inc. franchise, had failed to secure adequate financing, but because- of the marketability of this type of building he still sought a building permit for its construction for speculative pur- poses . He said the Sheehy's twin building next door already had 75% occupancy even though it is not yet completed. Several Board members questioned making, the 50 parking spaces only 9 feet wide, a foot less than that required by the City ordinance. Mr. Hiebel and Mr. Johnson were concerned with the minimum of greenery allowed .around the building wondering whether the park Planners had abandoned their efforts to provide the landscaping originally agreed to. Mr. Hiebel said he saw "only a concrete building in a sea of blacktop" . Both agreed that the building was too tight a fit for the lot especially because of its central location in the park where the project sould be more attractive. It was felt an overuse of the land could hinder development of adjacent properties . Mr. Hiebel also questioned whether the John Deere, Inc. business with a showroom fit into the office park concept of the development, say- ing he did not see the park as a high traffic area. �Ir. Fornell said the proposal could be allowed with a liberal intrepretation of usages permitted under the zoning ordinance. qtr. Johnson said he liked the truck bay design and felt the backside of the building was more attractive than the front. Saying he would be very uncomfortable granting a building permit for a proposal with so few specifics , fir. Hiebel said he would move for recommendation o.f disapproval of the building permit based on a need for more specific building, landscaping, elevation, lighting and signing plans as well as a desire for more relaxed parking plans . Before a second was obtained, Mr. Nielsen withdrew his request asking for more time to work the plans over in an effort to incorporate the Board's suggestions into a mroe acceptable proposal. Fir. Hiebel then withdrew his motion. Mr. Fornell 's memo of November 12th regarding Mr. Joe Sroga's plans to improve the appearance of his Standard Station at 32,01 Stinson Boulevard was discussed with Mr. Sroga after fir. Hiebel explained how the Board' s reauest for such information had resulted from atten- tion which had been focused on that neighborhood when the Board was considering the proposal for rebuilding Uie Jiffy riarket a block away. Mr. Sroga said he did not want to completely enclose the area in which the City's impounded or abandoned cars are stored because he wanted to be able to see that area from his home at 3204 Roosevelt Street N.E. for security reasons . He defended erecting an opaque slot cyclone fence rather than a wood fence comparing the maintenance costs of each and pointing out the successfuly use of such a fence for ten years by the Clark station down the street. He said he would be willing to donate the land to the south, which he has cleaned up, for use as a mini Park if the City is willing to take over its maintenance. Mr. Sroga also said only the farthest east end of the City ' s sewer easement would be affected by the erection of the fence. He also mentioned the good relations he enjoyed with his neighbors attributing (2) • it in part to the fact that he closes the station at 7nOO P.m. thus eliminating bright lighting and noisy operations . Poor economic conditions for small businessmen especially gas station operators were the basis for Mr. Sroga 's inability to make' any more expensive improvements of the property . He said the small garage next to the station is used for hobby purposes by his father. Mr. Marks will represent the Board at the next Council meeting. Motion by !°?r. marks and seconded by Mr. Johnson to adjourn the meet- ing at 9 : 50 P.N. A:4� Motion carried unanimously. i I.A .MA I 1 • - i .3 (3) CITY OF ST. ANTHONY • COUNCIL !•1INUTFS Voverl-er 23 , 1976 The reetinc was calle(I to orter by ? avor IqiP.e:,tke at 7 ?5 P.?I. Present for roll call - Sauer, I,,-i(--rltke an,0 Tlail- Pbsent7 Sunelane and Staiiffer Also Present - Jernr Mal(' ar . City Vlana(,Ter Larry Vickrey . City Attorney I .C. Comstoc]- ., City Fncineer (arrives' at ?�otion by Councilman Sauer and seconded by Councilman Fai), to approve the r-i'nute's" of the Nover-ilbpr 1..6 , 1976 Counci 1 �'eetina- Motion carries'. unanir-ously. George ('.arks discussed the rinutes of the r7ovey-her 16 . 1.976 PlannincT Board meeting.' I I - ' ..e told of the 'Presentation r,.a( e !,y Pick Yrier, Planninc- Director for the City of Richfield , of that City 's nlans to reeevelo.r) the Oeteriorating Lyndale -- 66th and Vicollet (Hub) cormercial and residential neighborhood.. The PoarO fount' that much of the 'n1an could )-.e applies' to the C'ite' s efforts to uncrarle • the St. Anthony Shonnin(7 center, accor0incT to P'r. ?Iarl-s who is a member of the task force formed to stuOv such action. This aroun is scheduled to meet after the first of the vear, Councilman SunOlan(l arrive O at 7 - 40 P.PI. Councilman Stauffer arriverl at 7 -A2 P.P% No recommendations were made by the Foars' reaareina the say Fealty proposal for a • 26 ,260 sauare foot ,.Yarehouse/off.i.ce/shovrroor- to he erected in the St. Anthony Office Park since the rerTuest for a building Perr-it was withdrawn by its raker . Jeff Mielsen , vho will .Otterpt to rework the plans to meet the Foarri ' s objections . The Planning Board representative then told of the nroposal made by Mr. Joseph Sroca.,Jr. to improve the annearance of .his Standard :. Station at 3201 Stinson Boulevard . The Board will consider any firm proposal which Mr. Sroaa ray make re(-ar(q_inrT the portion of his lane iihich the station operator ha.0 inr:licated an interest in donating to the City for a mini park , considering at that time "at access could be provided to the area among other points brouaht UT) by the Council members . ?Ir. Dulaar advised Mr. Plarks that a planner anfl sian corroany rb:,',... oresentative would attend their next r-eetinrT to Oiscuss' -th e no s s i ] le • quidelines which right be incorporated into th e City 's sic n or Oin ante for free standing signs. Steve Chairson of the Morthqate P-lotel was nresent to discuss licenses for the restaurant and bottle cluL- which are associated with the Morthgate hotel . CITY OF ST. ANTHONY I REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ • Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number Resolution ' May 6 , 1982 ordinance Unfinished Business-6 1 Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Craig Morri s- Other May 11 , 1982 Information/Action as Necessary Fence Completion TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager ------'------------------------------------------------------------------ .. SUMMARY DISCUS_ SION OF SUBJECT: The Letter of Credit for the Craig Morris pro- ject was cashed in on Friday, April 30th, so we now hold the $3,200. The fence is not complete as of this writing, but Gordon Hedlund has informed me that it will be done. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A ALTERNATIVES : RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends waiting, since we have their money, to give them some additional time to install the fence (figuring shipping delays , etc.) . If no progress by June 8, staff will return with a recommendation to install the fence. i l i CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : P-1 . 01-d / I&WA-A i EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 339-8291 (AREA CODE 612) File: Financial Specialists: Ehlers and Associates, Inc. Please distribute to governing body members May 1, 1982 Newsletter The bond market struggles to come back, but with even a modest improvement the pent up demand for long term funds surfaces and interest rates head up again. There is no doubt that our concern of ages ago was justified: Overuse of tax exempt financing has DOW JONES MUNICIPALS diluted the interest saving inherent in tax exemption. ° WEEKLY AVERAGE OF TWENTY 121 117 20-YEAR BONDS 11 LAST WEEK 13.88% 0 PAEV.WE K 13.81% IDBI 1082 J A 5 0 N D J F M ]Ui THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Monday, April 12, 1982 * * * * * * * * * * Minnesota general obligation municipal bond interest rate limits are now one percent above the Bond Buyer Index of 20, 20 year bonds, rounded to the next highest full percent, as determined by the • Commissioner of Finance on the 20th of each preceding month. G.O. bonds payable from special assess- ments [sic], as well as non-G.O. bonds, have a one percent higher limit (15% for April). * * * * * * * * * * New ideas keep entering the tax exempt bond market such as "puts", letters of credit, insurance, stepped coupon bonds, zero coupon bonds, mandatory call term bonds, each of which is said to be a "sure" way to reduce interest rates. Some have promise, but, as with some old "new" ideas, such as deep discount bids there are apt to be trade-offs. We tend to stay with proven ways until a clear advantage is shown from novel approaches. * * * * * * * * * * Eden Prairie, Minnesota, completed its $18 million tax increment financing. Unique not only because of its size (for tax increment projects in this area, at least) and because it was insured (first AMBAC insured G.O. bonds in Minnesota), the financing is particularly noteworthy because of its pur- pose. The City will now complete an extensive complex of Federal , Interstate, State, County and City highway interchanges for which funds had dried up which will greatly improve traffic flow, public safety, the prosperity of the City's major commercial center and the City's own economic base. * * * * * * * * * * Ehlers and Associates will have an interesting seminar on May 5 on coping with city revenue problems. Invitations were limited to twelve counties in and around the metro area but some openings may remain when this newsletter is received which will be available on a first come first served basis. The cost is $15 to cover lunch and materials. This meeting will be repeated if there is a demand. Very truly yours, WEhlers . • it SUMMARY OF AREA BOND SALES Net Dow Municipality Date Type of Bonds Amount Maturity Rate Jones Rating MINNESOTA • Buffalo 2/22/82 G.O. Municipal Building Bonds 895M 1984-96 11.04% 13.66% A Karlstad 2/23/82 G.O. Short-Run Nursing Revenue 500M 1984 9.53% 13.66% NR Bonds Mpls.-St. Paul Metro 2/16/82 G.0 Tax Anticipation Area (Metro Council) Certificates of Indebt. 530M 1983 8.04% 13.81% MIG-1 Ostego 2/22/82 G.O. Improvement Bonds 255M 1983-92 11.05% 13.66% NR Eden Prairie 3/2/82 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 18,000M 1985-2000 11.99% 12.41% A Eden Prairie 3/2/82 G.O. Improvement Bonds 4,300M 1984-95 11.38% 12.41% A Chippewa County 3/3/82 G.O. Drainage Bonds 410M 1983-97 10.78% 12.41% A South Washington 3/9/82 G.O. Aid Anticipation County ISD No. 833 Certificates of Indebt. 2,830M 1982 8.99% 13.21% NR Winthrop 3/16/82 G.O. Water and Sewer Bonds 300M 1984-88 10.06% 13.44% Baa-1 Albany 3/15/82 G.O. Improvement Bonds 67M 1983-92 11.53% 13.44% NR Dilworth 3/24/82 G.O. Building Bonds 225M 1984-92 10.97% 13.71%' Baa Elk River ISD No. 728 3/30/82 G.O. Anticipation Certificates of Indebt. 460M 1982 9.01% 13.76% NR Elk River ISD No. 728 3/30/82 G.O. Tax Anticipation Certificates of Indebt. 1,100M 1983 9.20% 13.76% NR Nashwauk 3/30/82 G.O. Temporary Construction Bonds 625M 1983 9.12% 13.76% A Ramsey 3/30/82 G.O. Metropolitan Watershed District Improvement Bonds 5,290M 1984-93 10.50% 13.76% Aaa Washington County 3/30/82 G.O. Metropolitan Watershed District Improvement Bonds 1,490M 1984-93 10.71% 13.76% A Mahnomen 4/5/82 G.0 Grant Anticipation Bonds 170M 1984 9.29% 13.81% Baa St. Paul ISD No. 625 4/6/82 G.O. Tax Anticipation Certificates of Indebt. 10,050M 1982 8.94% 13.81% MIG-1 Willmar 4/7/82 Municipal Utilities Revenue Bonds 2,700M 1984-96 11.65% 13.81% A Willmar 4/7/82 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,445M 1984-98 11.26% 13.81% A Willmar 4/7/82 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 850M 1985-95 11.40% 13.81% A WISCONSIN • La Crosse 1/28/82 Hospital Facilities Revenue Bds. (St. Francis Hospital) 4,000M 1983-91 12.59% 13.96% A Grafton 3/2/82 Promissory Un. Tax Notes 1,600M 1983-91 9.00% 12.41% A Clark County 3/3/82 G.O. Health Care Facility Revenue Bonds 8,650M 1983-91 11.62% 12.41% AA Dousman 3/3/82 Special Assessment "B" Bonds 240M 1983-91 12.62% 13.41% NR West Allis 3/16/82 Promissory Unlimited Tax Notes 13,530M 1983-92 12.08% 13.44% Al Rice Lake 3/23/82 Sewerage System Mortgage 2,000M 1984-93 12.13% 13.71% NR Bonds Holmen 3/30/82 G.O. Sewage Treatment Bonds 800M 1985-94 12.50% 13.76% Baa-1 Kenosha 4/5/82 Promissory Unlimited Tax Notes 4,240M 1983-91 11.78% 13.81% A-1 La Crosse 4/6/82 Corporate Purpose Bonds 3,530M 1984-94 11.14% 13.81% Aa Wauwatosa 4/6/82 Corporate Purpose Bonds 2,485M Promissory Notes 200M 1983-94 10.65% 13.81% Aaa Madison 4/6/82 Promissory Notes 5,400M 1983-92 10.27% 13.81% Aaa NORTH DAKOTA Grand Forks 3/15/82 Refunding Improvement Bonds 3,650M 1984-97 10.78% 13.44% Aa SOUTH DAKOTA So. Dak. Housing Development Authority 3/16/82 Multi-Family Revenue Bonds 13,595M 1984-95 13.57% 13.44% A-1 2013 & 2022 Sioux Falls 3/30/82 G.O. Coupon-Water Reclamation Bonds 3,150M 1984-1994 10.92% 13.76% Aa-1 Belle Fouche 4/5/82 G.O. Water Bonds 595M 1988-94 11.91% 13.81% 9aa-1 IOWA • Marshalltown 2/24/82 Medical Clinic Revenue Bonds 6,660M 1983-93 10.06% 13.66% Aa-1 Waverly 3/22/82 Electric Revenue Bonds 7,100M 1983-97 12.93% 13.71% A Sac City 3/15/82 Sewer Improvement Bonds 375M 1983-94 10.48% 13.44% NR