HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 05221984 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
ioosm
Box: 16
Folder: CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
Document: CC PACKET 05221984
I �
H.R.A. IIUIEDIATELY FOLLO?SING
j REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING.
• CITY OF,_e°ST: �ANMHONY
COUN.CfiiSJ'�,AGENDA
June '"1'994
7: 3,0"P.M.
A. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Roll Call.
C. Approval of June 1.1, 1984 Council Minutes .
D. Licenses/Permits/Petitions .
E. Presentation of Claims .
1. Verified Claims.
2. East Bethel Landfill - $5 , 386 . 50 (this item is also listed
with the verified claims) .
3. AMM, 1984-85 Dues - $1,406 . 00 .
F. Reports .
1. Council.
• 2 . Planning Commission - Commissioner George Wagner.
a. Minutes , , June 19 , 1984 .
b. Lot Split/Varriance - Mike McGinn, 4017 Fordham Drive.
C. Setback Variance - Mike Pribula, 3231 Roosevelt Street.
d. Setback Variance - Ed Brown, 2702 - 33rd Avenue N.E.
e. Elmwood Lutheran Church - Mobile Home for Temporary
Classroom Space.
3. Departments and Committees.
a. Chemical Abuse Information Committee Minutes - May 7, 1984 . .
b. Financial Report - February, 1984.
4. City Manager.
a. Staff Meeting Notes - June 19', 1984 .
b. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Request for Water
Connection to Roseville.
C. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Request for Sewer
Connection to Minneapolis .
d. Supplemental 1984 Local Government Aid Notice.
G. Public Hearings .
H. New Business.
I . Unfinished Business.
J. Adjournment.
r
CITY OF ..ST. ANTHONY.
` . COUNCIL MINUTES
June 11, 1984
The meeting, which had been rescheduled from. June•:12th ..was opened 'at. -
7: 30 ..P..M. with the Pledge :of --Allegiance led. by Mayor Sundland.
Present for roll call: Ranallo, Sundland, Enrooth,. and_Makowske.. .
Absent: Marks.
Also present:' David- .Childs., City Manager; 'and Larry. Hamer, Public
Works Director.
During the discussion of the May 22nd Council -meeting :minutes,,-, 'Counci,lman
Makowske indicated she :wou-ld never have voted for the motion .on Page 7
which authorized the City's support for' the acquisition of a Doppler ,
Radar system- for testing by the National Weather service, but, rather,
had perceived that motion- had only authorized the City Attorney 'to jo.ok
further into the matter. - Councilman Enrooth had told- her- he -had
seconded the motion, fully .understanding ,that' Mr. Soth had already
indicated that he saw no problem with the City lending its non-profit
tax identif ication for donations: for the.'..purchase of the equipment. -to.-..
be made in the City's name •and that the motion approved such an . action
while authorizing. the details to be resolved -to the -satisifaction' of
the attorney. Mayor Sundland and Councilman Ranallo indicated they
had based their .vote of approval on the same assumption. Mr. Childs
added that. he had found out that the upgraded Doppler system recently
announced by Channel 5 was still not the equipment with a single
computer assisted display system, which the Kavouris Company had
proposed be tested by the Weather Service. _
Councilman Ranallo modified, with the approval of, the others, the ,word
ing of Paragraph 8, ' Page 3, to. indicate- the Counci.l 'and the .Mayor had
only authorized the Fire and Police Departments to look- into the
feasibility of writing a new ordinance to require partitions between
every two stalls in apartment garages . The Councilman' said he was
concerned the restrictions might apply to the -Kenzington garages , but
Mr. Hamer told him he understood -the State Uniform Building' Code :would
-be making an exception for that structure..due to the ..construction . . ' .
materials used.
-The following -amendments and. changes -were accepted- for:-the •May 22nd
minutes :
-Page 1, para. 6: Correct the spelling of "Councilman"' in line 1.
Page 3, para. 8: Substitute "investigate the -feasibility" for "parti�
cipate in the development" in lines 1 and 2.
- Page 4, para.. 5: Substitute "a number of" for "numerous" in line 1:
Page 5, para. 4:' Delete "business" in* line 11.1.
G
-2-
Motion by Councilman Makowske 'and seconded by Mayor Suhdland to approve.,. .-
as - amended the minutes for the 'Council meeting held May 22, 1984.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion -by. Councilman Ranal to :and seconded, by -Councilman Enrooth.-to .-.
approve ,`the -minutes -for, the Board -of .,Review •held May -.22,. 1984...after_
correcting the spelling 'of '"owed" in line 4 of paragraph 6.
Motion carried unanimously:
Motion by Councilman Makowske and seconded by Councilman Ranallo: to
grant the following . licenses- and permits listed .in._:the Ma .22, 19.8.4
Council agenda:
; Multiple Housing Permits
Wesley Robertson, �3605-15. 37th-Avenue N.E. ;
John Krohn (Apache Manor) , 3817 Macalaster Drive;
-Michael Fannon, 30.42 .Old Highway -8; .
Frances .-Sandberg, 3820 Macalaster Drive; and
Sheldon Mortenson (Caravelle) , 3713- 3800 .Foss Road.
Heating Licenses
A-ABC Appliance and Heating; and .
Equipment_ Supply, -.Inc.,
Contractors Licenses
Erco, Inc. , Columbia Heights;
Minnesota Lumber & Wrecking, St. Paul;
Kloster-Madsen, Inc. , Bloomington;
Shelter Construction, Inc. , Minneapolis;
Benoy Bros : :Construction Co. , Spring .Lake Park;
Design Consultants of Minneapolis,• .Inc. , St. Louis Park;
Michels Construction Co. , Roseville;
Bjergo Construction, Blaine;
George W. Lovgren &, Sons, New Hope,;
D. •W. Harstad Co.., Inc. , .Fridley;
Redalen' s Masonry, St. Paul;
Denny Thorn Construction, Stacy, MN;
Father & Son Construction, Minneapolis;
A-1 Quality Construction- Co. , New- Brighton;
George Janick Construction, Minneapolis;
Neeser Construction Co. ,. Excelsiorr
Danielle Properties, White "Bear Lake;
Bill Niesen Construction Co. , Hopkins;
Dav-Ko' Home..Improvements,_-Columbia Heights-; ,and
Widlund Construction, Arden Hills '.
-Motion carried unanimously. ..
-Motion by Councilman Ranallo .and. seconded. by Councilman Enrooth to. •
grant a temporary 3.2 beer permit to= .Carl Olson, 3611-37th Avenue N.E. ,
for the consumption, not sale,, of beer during a family picnic to be.
held in Central Park from 12:00 to 7:00 P.M. , Judy 14, 1984.
-3-
Motion carried unanimously.
A number of: questions were -raised related to,.,the temporary 3..2 beer
permit- x
requested* for' the LeDou •-s Corner 'N.E. :softball tournament..to
be held in Central . Park,. August. 11th--and- 12th, ;for which $200 .a..day, in-,
..rental fees were -to be charged.
Motion by Councilman Ranallo- and seconded by Mayor Sundland.' to: table
action on the application for a temporary 3.2 beer permit from Thomas
Brama -for,"the softball tournament to -be held August 11th and 12th, .until
staff has investigated further the applicant's home address and whether
the applicant proposed the -sale of beer. -
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by -Courici'lman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to
approve_ payment of all verified claims listed for May 31, 198.4 In the'
May 22, 1984 Council agenda; as well as $1, 393.65. t6 Dorsey & Whitney.
for legal services during April, 1984.
Motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Ranallo indicated he was very encouraged to see the City:°s
Marketing Committee would be looking '*irito ways of aiding young families.
to purchase homes in St. Anthony. He was also pleased to find that
• the Committee intends to -cooperate in the grand. reopening of the Silver
Lake Mall (,Apache Plaza) and it wa's noted that the garden clubs would , -
be working with the, mall management to improve the aesthetics of the
area around the -center.
Councilman Enrooth-reported attending a recent meeting of the Silver -
Lake Home Owners Association at the Salvation Army campgrounds and said
he perceives the lake to be areal asset to the City, one which may have
previously- been overlooked-. Vhe 'Councilman indicated there had been a ..
great deal of discussion about-:the-misuse of the lake- and a Columbia - .
Heights Police Officer who was in attendance had told the residents
their complaints about racing boats, etc. , should be directed to- either
the Ramsey or Anoka County Sheriff 's Offices. The Mayor said he had
investigated and found Ramsey County -is responsible for policing the
lake and had suggested to them that it might: be beneficial to have
the water patrol to make, an occasional appearance .on .the lake.
Councilman Makowske said she had received. a call related to the City's
Channel 11 T.V. advertising for the new liquor warehouse which the
caller had termed 'as. "very tasteless". Ray Nelson had received many
complimentary comments about the same television spot, according to the
Manager,. -
The January financial report and. the .May fire department report and
liquor- operation---summary were -accepted- as informational-' following a
brief discussion;�'of 'the latter. in which- Mr. Childs advised that the. .
auditor-' had 'indicated. the next report might give a more accurate profit
picture for the new warehouse operation. He•.also said the insurance
carried on the Apache -operation.-had not 'been _settled yet and- could also
affect_.the final figures.
-4-
The Manager said the request from the Minneapolis Park and Recreation
Board for Minneapolis water and sewer connections for the Gross Golf
Course Clubhouse would be deferred to the next Council meeting, June 26th
Mr ' Hamer had submitted a lengthy report on the operations of the City
water system and he advised it would probably be necessary for the City
to implement an odd/even sprinkling ban for the City this summer,
especially since Superfunding would be available to the City only if
water conservation measures are taken.
Motion by Councilman Makowske and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to
authorize the City Manager and Public Works Director to take whatever
water conservation measure they believe necessary for the summer.
Motion carried unanimously.
In his June 11th memorandum, Mr. Childs had listed the actions which
the Council should take to implement the Roseville water connection.
Mr. Hamer had tabulated the four bids for the watermain connection
construction on 29th Avenue N.E. which had been taken June 4th and
advised that the lowest had been for $127,090 from R. W. Moore. The
Public Works Director said the engineers had underestimated the cost
of the meter manhole and had estimated the project cost to be $105 ,000,
which, Mr. Childs said, could probably be offset somewhat, if the City
is able to rent or borrow a meter from St. Paul, which the R. W.
Moore company has agreed to modify their bid to exclude. Councilman
Ranallo commented that the final cost would be much lower than an •
earlier proposal from the water softener companies to rent their
equipment. Mr. Childs indicated state officials had urged the City to
apply for state superfunds with an adjustment to be made later for
any federal monies , if such funds are made available to the City.
Motion- by Councilman Enrooth and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to
adopt the resolution which accepts the proposal from Short-Elliott-
Hendrickson, Inc. for the preparation of plans and specifications for
the construction of the watermain along 29th Avenue N.E. to provide
temporary water service to a portion of St. Anthony from the Roseville
system at a cost of $7,000 , which would be reimbursed from the state
Superfund.
RESOLUTION 84-028
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A PROPOSAL FOR PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A WATERMAIN INTERCONNECTION
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Enrooth and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to
adopt the resolution which awards the contract for the watermain con-
struction on 29th Avenue N.E. to R. W. Moore for an amount not to
exceed $127,090 with the total project cost not to exceed $134 ,090,
plus attorney's fees, if the City is unable to rent or borrow an 8 inch
meter manhole from St. Paul, and subject to St. Paul and Roseville agree-
ing to the connection of the Roseville water system to a portion of
St. Anthony, as proposed.
-5-
• RESOLUTION 84-029
A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF A WATERMAIN INTERCONNECTION
Motion carried unanimously .
The Manager reported St. Paul would be willing to sell water to the City
at the same rate they charge their high tier cumstomers, rather than
the lower rate charged to Roseville, but he said he anticipated a lower
rate than 75fi could be negotiated with St. Paul if the Roseville Con-
nection were to become permanent. Mr. Childs said the City would
have to pay out about 45G per hundred cubic feet more for St. Paul
water than is charged the City users under the new water rates.
Mr. Hamer reported encountering no problems with negotiating the seven
easements necessary for the watermain construction.
A rough draft of the agreement with St. Paul and Roseville for the
water connection had been included with the Council agenda and Mr.
Childs told the Council there had been no problem with the concept at
the City, Roseville, or St. Paul staff level. He said the final
document to be drafted by the attorneys for the three parties would be
submitted for the St. Paul Water Board approval , June 20th.
Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Mayor Sundland to adopt
• the resolution which authorizes the City Manager and Mayor, and to be
reviewed by the City Attorney, to enter into an agreement with Roseville
and St. Paul for Roseville to provide water to St. Anthony for a period
ending October 31, 1985 , in accordance with the rough draft presented
to the City Council and Mayor, June 11 , 1984 .
RESOLUTION 84-030
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO
ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITIES OF
ROSEVILLE AND ST. PAUL FOR A WATERMAIN
INTERCONNECTION ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Motion carried unanimously.
The Manager had several encouraging reports related to City properties .
He said the home at 3012 Silver Lake Road, which had been so poorly
maintained had been foreclosed by the VA and the Clark Oil Company
property on the corner of 33rd Avenue and Stinson Boulevard had been
sold to a neighbor. He also indicated the adjoining property owners
to the Walbon property on Old Highway 8 seemed to be generally agree-
able to having that property developed for a 32 unit townhome project
in spite of one strong objection from one neighbor.
Mr. Childs said H.U.D. officials would be in the City to investigate
the request for 202 funding for the Kenzie Terrace senior housing
• project which the Manager reported had tied for first place Metropolitan
Council rating with a Rogers, Minnesota project.
In his June 8th memorandum recommending Council approval of the police
contract negotiated with AFSCME, Mr. Childs had recommended funding a
-6-
5% increase for non-union -personnel in keeping with settlements. in other •
communities . There was an indepth' discussion of this. request, with
Councilman •Ranallo: indicating he would like to have the dollar amount
involved rather than tying the raise to union wage increases . Topics
which were also covered were the anticipated requirement for setting
the criteria for comparable work ,values and the provision in the 1984
budget for salary increases negotiated this year with the liquor as
well as public works and fire department employees . Councilman Ranallo
iridicated. the former would be addressed at the League of Minnesota
Cities conference in Duluth that week and the Manager said the Metro
Area Managers Association .had agreed to bid on a proposal for a . study
to establish a common denominator on which the criteria for comparable
work values might be set for all the cities involved.
Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Mayor Sundland to adopt
Resolution 84-031.
RESOLUTION 84-031
A RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE 1984 AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY AND AFSCME LOCAL 57, REPRESENTING , THE
ST. ANTH014Y POLICE DEPART14ENT AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE
AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Mayor Sundland and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to adjourn
the meeting at 9 : 25 P.M.
Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Helen Crowe, Secretary
Mayor
I
i
i
ATTEST:
City Clerk
i
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST :FOR CITY COUNCI.LT30TWN -
• ---------------------------------------------- -----------------------
Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution Licenses/Permits
June 20, 1984 Ordinance
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title. Licenses/Permits
Other .
June 26., 19.84 for Council Approval
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: Lila Johnson, License/Billing Clerk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT:
MULTIPLE HOUSING REGISTRATION HEAT ING,'.L'CE'NSES-: (certificates on file)
Equinox Properties , c/o Sentinel Care Air =f4nd.it.ioning S Heating, Inc.
Management Frank's Heaving & ,Air Conditioning, Inc.
Diamond 8 Apartments, c/o Dependable Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
Kleinman Realty Northeast Sheet Metal
Fred Vogt & Company
CONTRACTORS LICENSES (.cert. on file) Owens Services Corporation
X-Pert Roofing, White Bear Lake S B S Mechanical , Inc.
Robert Weber Homes, New B.righton Suburban Air Conditioning Co.
Bryan Kingsriter, St . Anthony
Air Comfort, Inc.
Carlson-Lavine, Inc. , Minneapolis Ray N. Welter Heating Co.
Modern Insulation, Inc. , Osseo Superior Contractors , Inc.
Barkley Construction Co. , Minneapolis Golden Valley Heating & Air Conditioning/
Century Roofing, Maplewood Richmond >; Sons Electric, Inc.
Wilcox Services, Inc. , Hudson, WI Suburban Heating & Air Conditioning , Inc.
Jer-den Builders, Inc. , St.. ,Paul Nielsen Sheet Metal , Inc.. .
Standard Heati-ng & Air Conditioning Co.
Blaine Heating & Air Conditioning
Yale, Inc. ,
TEMPORARY 3.2 BEER PERMIT
Carl Branger, Village Originals
(This group usually meets every year in
our park. We have had no problems
in the past)
Patricia Fagerlee, for family picnic
Thomas Brama-LeDoux's Corner N.E. Softball
Team (This was tabled at previous
meeting)
CITY- MANAGER'S -REVIEW: COMMENTS :
i
i
I
± ' CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING/PERMITS
The following is application for use of liquors, including non-toxicating malt
liquor 0.2 Beer) in City parks.
FULL NAME OF APPLICANT
ADDRESSl'�:'`1� �
AGE
certify that I am a resident of St. Anthony/or work in City of St. Anthony.
1 am r onsible for conduct of his/her group.
Signature of applicait
NAME OF GROUP
$50.00 0 O
Cleanup Deposit Jt'Q• -��"8y) NO.
PARK LOCATION_
Received by;
ANDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.282
Community Services Department
'3301 Silver Lake Rd• St. Anthony, MN 55418 • Phone: 781-5021
• Facilities Reservation Form Permit No. _Q.,�Y_ •
Name ` ���- �/�/J,/z'. .X_ Home Phone /A� 5 9 Bus. Phone ��-s�`����
Address jya'y �3���y� /✓/= Date
Name of Group or Organization
Intended Use
Date(s) wanted J�� OT T Day(s) Su M T W Th F ®(circle) o
Building:
9
High School Auditorium 1
Park View Community Center Cafeteria I
Wilshire Park Elem. School Classroom(s) #
_Other T.0 Gymnasium (If High School, circle one:
OLD NEW
Kitchen
Other
Doors to open am pm Expected attendance:
Activity begins am 2, pm Admission: Free Charge j
•tivity ends am _& pm Will merchandise be sold?
i
x Special arrangements needed (chairs. cooks. AV equipment, etc.):
�i
I�
1 hereby certify that I am an agent of the above named group or organization and am authorized to accept in their
name the responsibility for observance of the rules and regulations of the Board of Education, Independent School
District #282. As a group or organizational agent,l will attend this function,and I will be solely responsible for giving
any and all instructions to the custodians or other support personnel.Presentation of this permit to the custodian on
duty is necessary for admittance for the initial date. In accepting this arrangement, rentee agrees to hold harmless
I.S.D. 282 and its representatives from all claims incurred in use of the facility.Rentee waives all rights and claims for
potential damages incurred in this rental arrangement. /
(signature of responsi person)
Bill to:
(name) (address)
---------------------------------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY------ -------------- -----�--
Class Ins Approved by , Date 1 Sr
i
arges: Rental Custodial
Cooks Other charges:
Note:
WMT!—Coomelty 8 le.e OMeo CWr CANARY—Suehuee OIIIeo Copy PINK—Cuotoaar Copy GOLD—Appllgnt'o copy
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING/PERMITS
The following is application for use of liquors. including non-toxicating 'malt
liquor (3.2 Beer) in City parks.
,
FULL NAME OF APPL 1 CAN . t
'°� • ADDRESS
AGE
1 certify that i am a resident of St. Anthony/or work in City of St. Anthony.
1 am responsible for conduct of his/her group.
Signature of applicant
" !j ; NAME OF GROUP
: . altHER slot
NO. 6,5 OF PAMi LT
$50.00 •
�� ! Cleanup Deposit �O �`Sd
PARK LOCATION �-�-
_'� , Received by;( l� ) PIGN1c-
!; W-
ii�'F
• O.r•r•_• b•.Y•Ir•. • %0'VOOVVa• 60OUI6 f10V4 IV We 46W496
Community Services Department
3301 Sllirifr Lake Rd a St. Anthony.MN 55418 is Phone:781-5021
. FacillUes Reservation Form Permit No.
• _
Name Home Phone e
Bus. Phon
Address D Date I A 14
Name,ol Group or Organization
Intended Use
Date(s) wanted Day(s) Su M T W Th F Sa (circle)
Building:
High School Auditorium
Park View Community Center Cafeteria
Wilshire Park Elem. School Classrooms) ft
Other Gymnasium (If High School. circle one:
Kitchen OLD NEW )
Other
Doors to open am pm Expected attendance:
Activity beginslu-IJ7%am ?:n pm Admission: Free Charge
Activity ends am pm Will merchandise be sold?
• Special arrangements needed (chairs. cooks. AV equipment, etc.):
I hereby certify that 1 am an agent of the above named group or organization and am authorized to accept in their
name the responsibility for observance of the rules and regulations of the Board of Education. Independent School
District#282.As a group-cr-organizational agent,l will attend this function,and I will be solely responsible for giving
any and all instructions to the custodians or other support personnel.Presentation of this permit to the custodian on
duty Is necessary for admittance for the initial date. In accepting this arrangement, rentee agrees to hold harmless
I.S.D. 282 and its representatives from all claims incurred in use of the facility.Rentee waives all rights and claims for
potential damages incurred in this rental arrangement.
(signature of responsi0 'son)
Bill to:
!name) (address)
•---------------------------------------------FOR OFFICE SE ONLY�..�___�_____._�_..
Class Ins Approved by Date
Charges: Rental Custodial
Cooks Other charges: '
•
Note:
wNA!�lewuwu•M►t�.niew dlie.Cew ��IUM—ewe...•Oil1c•Errr OIMR�GwrN�w Pw� eel0��f11 OMO
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY-
.:' DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING/PERMITS •
The following is application for use of liquors, including non-toxieating malt
liquor 0.2 Beer) in City parks.
FULL NAME OF APPL I CANT` , - n ,� V,
ADDRESS 0 St 1v•v j.K GA .
AGE
I certify that I am a resident of St. Anthony/or work in City of St. Anthony.
a 1gnaresponsible for conduct of his/her group.
ture of appl cant ...
NAME OF.GROUP
$50.00
Cleanup Deposit PARK LOCATION
Received by;
:`INDEPENDENT-SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 282-
Community ServWes Department
3301 Silver lake Rd a SL Anthony, MN SS418 a Phone: 781.5021
or Facilities Reservation Form Permit No. .Q>r.
NameOIf1f12nvv
� Ls,flcM (Home Phone Bus. Phone
Address - 2 ��� � �-�lTsl'�A&) " 'Cyt4�M1io� sslapate ...(oil
Name of Group or Organization �r� 1i S C [�►'k/' /V� �lot`�t �1 1 uet '�^_
Intended Use lr ` ��y.ti.r"►�i "
Date(s) wanted / `�`tl '" �•� Day( Su M T W Th Fe (Circle)
Building:
Nigh School Auditorium
Park View Community Center Cafeteria
Wilshire Park Ele . Sch i Classroom(s) 0
Other .{�„s . . GV. � Gymnasium (If High School. circle one:
OLD NEW )
Kitchen
Other
Doors to open $am pm Expected attendance: tuAs
Activity De-ins IQ _pm Admission: _ Free _Charge
�ctivity ends am ---I---Pm Will merchandise b io
Special arrangements needed ,cnaifs. cooks. AV equipment. etc.):
I hereby certify that I am an agent of the above named group or organization and am authorized to accept in their
name One responsibility for observance of the rules and regulations of the Board of Education. Independent School
District 0282. As a group or organizational agent,l will attend this function.and 1 will be solely responsible for giving
any and all instructions to the custodians or other support personnel.Presentation of this permit to the custodian on
duty Is necessary for admittance for the Initial date. In accepting this arrangement, rentee agrees to hold harmless
I.S.D. 282 and its representatives from all claims incurred in use facility.Rentee Ives all rights and claims for
potential damages incurred in this rental arrangement.
(signature of respon is person)
Bill t0: C< d21i:.� a.� C.Qi'Jlf'�� (YL�
(name! (awn") •
------NN--NN----�----------------- • NMI•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY _
Class Ins Approved by y•��'- Date
•Charges: Rental Custodial
Cooks Other charges:
Mote.
' •• MNII!—CAM"hWq aaae•.ON"C4" CAKMT—&AMON ON"Ca" 01*9—CwbAkw CMr GM0—Aprrwnf.CM
.i Y O F S- T A .N T H •L. N'• Y•'
P/E 6/26/64 A L C U u: iV •T S: P- A . Y-- A . 6 L: E 'PAGE 1
VENUUR•. .. NAME CHE(:K GHEGK .. CHECK
NO. TYPE DATE NO* AMUUNT ,
OOU•20 A A 6ATTEKY k 6/2b/84 U0663 98.24
G0120 AMERICAN LINLN R. 6/26/64 06664 45.18
00140 AMERICAN STEEL L IND SUP A . 6/26/84 06665 73.08
CU200 ANUEkS61i ASSOCIATES, EARL R 6/26/84 06666 _863.50
OU235 AT&T INFORMATIWi SYSTEMS R 6/26/ 84 U6667 301.03
00430 6RIGHTUN AUTO ELECTRIC R 6/26/64 06668 98. 77
GU46U 6RU-TEX ING R 6/26/84 06669 27.50
CU460 6RUWN PHUTU R, 6/26/64 0667U 24.99
C-0610 CATCU CLUTCH .& TRANS SVC . k, .6/26/84 06671 59.50
uob25 LGPY DUPL .PRUOUCTS iNG R 6/26/ 84 , 06672 188.44
00725 COMSERV k 6/26/84 06673 348.72
0078U GYS MEN BEAK R 6/26/84 06674 246.25
ouauu DAMES 6ATEk EQUIP INC R 6/26/84 06675 21 ,985.40
00810 i)IGKSLN .ELECTAILP M P A 6/20/64 06676 1. 567.00
Gu98u FLEXIBLE PIPE TUGL GO ' R 6/26/ 84 06677 744.92
01030 G & K SEkVILES k 6/26/84. 06678 217.20
010bu UAKELIGK STEEL LO K b/2b/84 06679 15.31
G1080 GATEWAY hAkUwAkE R 6/26/ 64 06680 68. 15
Cll�u GENUINE PARTS CO k 6/26/.84 06681 28.95
u12u0 uUHPER BEARING k 6/Zb/.84 06682 100.86
L1260 GREENTkEE ENGRAVING R 6/26/84 06683 5.50
U1285 GKirFIS UXYGEv R- -6/26/84 06684 8.'80
C14dQ HEALY LAb6kATLkiES k 6/26/64 06665 30960
01500 HLNNEPIN LTY FINANCE JIV R 6/26/84 U6686 499.50
C15U5 riENty CJ SHEk1FF t< 6/26/ £4 06687 449.67
OlbdO J L Ai;TU SUPPLY k 6/26/84 06688 . 197.22
01760 .TUNES CHEMILAL k 6/26/ 84 06689 .220s00
L177U KA,MPA TIRE LL A 6/26/ 84 06690 16.UU
u2+J4U LILLIE SUbUkbAN NE6SPAPE < R 0/2o/ 84 U6691 59.62
(.12obu ri B SUPPLY Lu R 6126/ b4 06692 110.22
L-214U MAP SI k 6/26/ 64 U6693 314. 10
�;22[u hEL S VAiv 6 LITE K 6/20/ d4 06694 91. 79
C2280 M1u:iEST ASPHALT LLkP k 6/26/84_ . Ub695 318.31
02320 MINAR FURD !NL k 6/26/84 06696 29.55
02340 M1 NN COMM R 6/26/84 06697 27.75
C2380 MINNEGASCO INC K 6/26/84 06698 632.07
02520 NATICNAL MUWER GU R _ 6126/84 06699 217.35
0264U NORTH STAk DUDGE R 6/26/84 06700 58.39
02660 NUR THFIELL) COMPANY R 6/26/84 06701 35. 50
02680 NORTHERN STATES POKER R 6/26/ 84 06702 5, 117.63
02700 NW BELL TELEPHGNE CC R 6/26/84 06703 325. 18
02720 Nw NATIONAL BANK OF MPLS R 6/26/84 06704 5,847.20
02805 PENNSYLVANIA OIL COMPANY R 6/26/84 06705 61.49
02960 POWER BRAKE EQUIP CC R 6/26/84 06706 25.60
03100 KOSECALE CHEVROLET R 6/26/84 06707 13.06
03290 -SHIELY CONCRE-TE MATERIALS R 6/26/84 06708 29239.49
03315 SERCO LABGRAT-URiES R 6/26/84 06709 - 141.00
• 03460 SPRING LK PK LUMBER CO R 6/26/84 06710 . 87.28
03485 ST TREAS SURP PROP FUND R 6/26/ 84- 06711 17.88`
C349U STREIGHER GUNS ING • DCN R 6/26/84 06712 95015
f
C I T Y O F S T A. N 1 H 0 N Y
P/E 6/26/84 A C C.':U -U• N• T , S P. A Y- A V. L. E PAGE 2
VLNUUk NAME CHICK . CHECK CH
�
tiU. TYPE OAT E NU. AMItTNT
03560 (RACY PRINTING k 6/26/84 06713 477.25
- 03645 TWIN CITY JAINITOR SUPPLY k 6/26/84 . 06714 227.93
03670 UNIFCRMS UNLIMITED K b/2b/84 06715 185.85;
03735 WARNER - 1NU •SUPPLY INC" R 6/26/ 84 06716 22. 18
03740 WATER PkODUCTS CU R 6126/84 06717 119,205.80
0675U FLASH F010 , K 6/26/84 06718 10. 05
66751 JACK HALEY R 6/26/84 06719 149.38
06752 DEPT OF •PUbLIL SAFETY k 6/26/84 06720 102020
66753 DEPT OF '-PUbLIC SAFETYL R• 6/26/64 06721 : 120.00
G6754 HAU ENS TEIi� L BuRNMEIS7ck -k- 6/26/84 06722 17.28
-06755 1NT 'L; TkUCKS INC k 6/26/64 06723 3.40
06756 LAND O' LAKFS INC R 6/26/84 06724 55.50
06757 EAST BETHEL LANDFILL k 6/26/ 84 06725 5.386.50
06758 BkLLK-WHITE LO R 6/26/ 84. 06726 47.80
06759 MINN SURV E ENGK SGCIETY R 6/26/84 06727 10.00
0676U MIDWEST 86LT & SUPPLY CU R 6/26/84 06728 40. 32
06761 HAZARD MONTHLY R 6/26/ 84 06729 19.00
U0' 762 AI RLLMM . INC R 6/26/84 06730 175. 30
06763 kEED SALtS •L SERVICE k 6/26/84 06731 459.94
06704 MAPLE GROVE HEATING R 6/26/84 06732 2v792.00
66765 NUR THRUP-KING R 6/26/ 64 06733 139. 11
U6766 CL-EVELANC LOTTLN PRLDOLTS k 6/20/84 06734 13 5
06767 LUNG LAKE- FORD TKACTUR R. 6/26/84 06735 4 0
Go7b8 SATELLITE iNL R 6/2b/ 64 06736 478.00
C-6769 YARNING LIT ES CF MINN 0L k .6/26/ 84 06737 100.20
66770 INTL CITY MGM ASSLC k 6/20/84 06738 236._44
06771 ED jASI MSK I R o/26/ 64 06739 15.00
0671L Arl'ER iLAN PLANNING ASSOC k o/26/64 06740 85.00
06773 Mu'E-OSUih LONSTRUCTILN R 6/26/84 06741 206.50
• '- Ob774 VOTING MACHINE SEkViLE it 6/26/84 06742 23.68
- 06775 CUMMINS OIESLL SALES k 6/26/ 04 06743 42. 22
Cd7"lo THOMAS HILL R 6/26/84 06744 50.00
06777 LENTURY ROUF1NG R 6/26/ u4 06745 46. 50
06778 SROGA'S STANDARD R 6/26/ 84 06746 40.95
Ob779 NORTHERN MU6ILE SUPPLY R 6/26/84 06747 9.90
4)678U INTL TRUCKS- INC. R 6/26/84 06748 .3.24
U6761 RUAL MACHINERY L SUPPLIES R 6/26/84 06749 39.03
TYPE TCTAL 67. 597.59
TGTAL 67,597.59
EAST BETHEL LANDFILL
SVLVESTER BROS.
i.• R. R. Bo: 255C
Cedar, Minnesota 55011
:.•F Phone 434-7473 or 434-5627 u �
a —V �` a
411 Charge Acct's Due 10th of Month After Invoice Date
1% Per Month -- 12% Per Tow Added On The 20th of Month After Invoice
Z. DATE REFERENCE CHARGE CREDIT BALANCE
I
I i
i
f
PLEASE PAY LAST A>IOUNT IN THIS COLL'.1N
k.
_ •l
- -;r�i. .,• .�tt�: .- ,,cam:."'
Board o.Directors
President
John T. ;;ving
Crystal as ociatlon of
Vice President me ropolitan
Ronald Backes June" 1, 1984 municipalities
St. Louis Park
Past President
Mary Anderson Mr. David M. Childs
Golden Valley City Manager
Directors 3301 Silver Lake Road
Miehad Baldwin Mpls., MN. 55418
Charnp!in
Dear Mr. Childs:
Wiliiam Barnhart
ezpaiis
I am privileged as the new president -of the Association of.- Metropolitan
C ry B;_tiara Municipalities- (AMM) to write this, letter which.-transmits your dues
statements, The AMM is our.-organization. It 'was 'formed by.-Metro- Area
Ci.ty.-Officials and is directed by .Metro Area City Officials•. The AMM
is-now beginning its second decade of.-service .to:...metro area cities and
we are united by our interest in preserving. the:. -ability.to-serve our .
constauents--and their-needs in the most effective,- efficient., .and-
-<: responsive "manner. All cities in the metro area have many-significant,
common concerns -and'- it is vital for cities to -work together to preserve
the opportunity -for local decision making.
The AAM is a leading force in lobbying- to, preserve .-local. control. We
are tested continuously by the Legislature and Metropolitan Council -in
many areas..- .Whi1e-.,it- is true that the area cities- may differ among
themselves: on some issues, it is important to identify the issues of
commonality (103 policy positions in 1983-84 for,example) that we.-may
work towards jointly, and attempt compromise on others or at least
_ identify 'those' areas that- cities- need- to concentrate what effort_ they-
can on their own.
—on Reinke
ji'dkODc�
The---AMM- is the. vehicle through--which we can share the costs to provide
:: cs Scheibel important information .and-data :which would be too expensive on an individual
c. Paul bases but is -useful to.:-all- cities-. i.e,., Metropolitan Area Salary Survey,
Mary Schwei;er Municipal Fee ,Survey:
St. Paul
I'look- forward ,to working wi th-you. and all member ci ty- officials and -your
)ackie Slater commitment is needed to succeed.., We.need-participation,by individual
Minneapolis officials�on..our- policy. committees and we .need -financial commitment as
IamesSpore reflected in the dues. The return we get as local officials and cities is
Burnsville -both measurable-.and vital . We cane better serve our constituents by
working. together;-thru the-AMM; :our organization.
obert Sun.dland
. Anthony Si erel y;. -
Robert Thistle
Coon Rapids -
Pon Backes-- St: Louis_ Park, Councilmember
Director F XiI'JtiVl'
Association of.Metropolitan-Municipalities President
`,'L�rn P,-tcrion 183 university avenue east, St. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-5600
I
ASSOCIATZON OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
DUES STATEMENT
Fiscal Year 1984 - 1985
June 1, 1984
ST. ANTHONY
City
183 University Avenue, East St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
By action of the.Board of Directors, 'the--dues schedule for membership in the
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities -has been set at 46ro of the annual dues
to the.,League of Minnesota Cities (total rounded to.the nearest dollar)
or $100, whichever is greater.
y
The membership dues in the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities for the,
year beginning June 1, 1984 and ending May 31, 1985 are $1,406.00 for the City of
St. Anthong (LMC dues $3,056 x 46%)•
I declare under the penalties of law that .the foregoing amount is just and correct
and that no part of it has been paid.
Vern Peterson , Ex6cutive Director
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
The records indicate that Clarence Ranallo -is the designated delegate .
and George Marks is the designated alternate to the Association
of Metropolitan Municipalities from your city. Please inform us if 'our records are
incorrect; or-if your city desires to make a change in your designated delegate/alternati
status. -_
ST, ANTHONY CHEMICAL ABUSE INFORMATION COMMITTEE'
May 7, 1984 -
Present: ' ,Karen Thoresen-Quinn, Pat Beaubien, Don Hickerson, Jan,Stroom,. Tom'
Lindskog, Evelyn Holthus, Joe Malrick, Barbara Malrick, Robert. Oliver
Glen Seefeldt, Ron Taylor..
Absent: Jean Klosterman, George. Marks and Katherine- Maxwell
.1. 'Jim Malrick, a student at-St..- Anthony asked for money to attend Partners in
Prevention this summer. The -cost is $425 and he is soliciting funds from
several sources. His presentation explained how he would use his skills as •a
teacher's aide to .Mrs. Freeman. , The committee passed. a motion to give
- $200.00 to Jim for the class with a check made out to Partners in Prevention-
and Jim when he had raised his total.
2. Roar Taylor .gave the Service Bureau report. He is continuing to see one new
family a week. The service will -continue over the summer.and at this point .
it appears St. Anthony will have, funding to be Youth Service Bureau members
next year..
.3. Secretary's report —approved.
4'. Tgeasurer's report $1,338.93 balance, (incl'udes check for- $1,100 from the City
Council for this year's funding)
5. A letter has-bean prepared by.-tve-lyn .Holthus requesting the budget for 1985
to be put on regular schedule for city budgeting. It will be sent tomorrow. ..
6. "Drinks for Driving" books will be sent to graduates along with a letter.
The letter-was- approved and signatures of committee members were added.-
7. Sports, Kids and Drugs program- for early fall was discussed. Cost of the .
. program will be $475.00 plus $1.00 per booklet, "My Parents Think I Don't-
Drink Because I'M In Sports." Tentative time and date was. selected as
7:00 P.M. on Thursday, September 7, 1984. It was decided to solicit funding
- for the purchase of the books..-.- A .letter will be sent to- selected businesses
and service organizations along with a. sample book. Follow up calls will be
made by the Committee before the next meeting (Tuesday, June 5th) . The
Committee unanimously recommends required attendance by students and strongly
urged attendance by parents. &-phoning system will be implemented at the
next meeting for parents to call parents. Evelyn Holthus will meet with all
coaches and staff under Minnesota State High School .League rules- on Thursday,
May .17th at 7:15 for exchange. of information and ideas. It was decided we
needed to meet once more to tie up some details of next fall=s program. Evelyn
�.wi11 bring a suggested invitation to be mailed to parents at -the -next meeting.
80_ All committee members were asked .to' decide whether or not they wished m be
.considered for re-appointment w St. Anthony Chemical Abuse Information
Committee. If you Will not be at the next meeting, Call Karen (633-7377
evenings) with your decision.
Meeting Adjourned at 9:00.
Next meeting - June 5th, Tuesday, in the Library.
Respectfully submitted,
� L\ .
I7v+--
Tom Lindskog
I
• I I
1
r
S T. A N T H O N Y
S L P P A R Y 8 U O G E T R E P O A T
• FEDRUARY 29. 1984 �
• GENERAL fUNO REVENUE •
BUDGET 1309c00.cc '270000.00 24091ce.6c, :70 .�0. .0C 445000C.6 442.500.00 158592c0e00
C MONTH .Oc 19931.CC 41,193.65 .CO .00' .00 20084.@0 .CO 892C9e69
Y T 0 .00 20167.15 li293'65. .CO .00 .00 2s8B3.00 .c0 120444.1b
ENCUMB 0C .0 .00 .CO .00 .00 .00 CO 00
BALANCE- 1301,000.00 240732.75 2330406.1'1 .CO .00 .00 1429111.00'- !420500.00 151297!5.'84
• GLP,EAAL FUND EXPENSE •
PAYOR - CCUK IL
BUDGET 14v85C.0C 50.00 49400.00 .00 15000C.00 .00 .00 .00 340300.00
C MONIH IiII3.SE- .CC 646.35 .el 70731.00 .00 .00 .CO 99650093
Y T 0' 2.404.18 .00 10109.2! .c0 70731.00 .00 eco .CO 110244.53
ENCUMS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ..c0 .c0 000
BALANCE 120445.82 50.00 3929C.6•. .CO 7.269.00 .00 .00 000 2300:5.47
GENERAL MANA(EPEN1
BUDGET 590525.00 .00 4.475.6C .6F1 900 .00 .00 .00 640000.00
C MONTH 49463.16 .00 10935.03 .CO. .00 .00 .co .CO 6.398.19
Y.T 0: 00222.31 .00 29090.(13 .CO .00 .00 .00 eco 101,312.34
ENCUMB .00 .CC .^E .C) .00 .00 .Co .00 . 000
BALANCE 510302.65 .07 20384.97 .00 -.00 .00 .00 ico 530687.66
ELECT7(NS
-BUDGET 2i40C.00 150.00 750.00 .00 .CO .00 .co 000 30300.00
C .MONTH e0C .CC .Cc .CO .00 .00 .CO .c0 .ieo.
Y T 0 .00 .00 .0C .00 .00 .00 .c0 .00 000
ENCUPS; .CC .CC .Cc .06 .00 .o0 .CC .00 .000
BALANCE 2'9400.00 150.00 75C.Gc .Co- .00 .00 .c0 000 393co:e00
FINANCE/INSLRAKCE/ACCOLNT.ING
BUDGET 339600.00 6.COD:00 61,500.Cc .CO. .00 .00 .00 .00 l0lelc0a00
C. MONTH 2.956.14 5.449:69- .CO V .QO .0C .CO .C9 2o1E0i26-
Y T 0 50205.65 313;4,9 1.139.ES- .M . .30 '.00 .GO .CO 4.379.25
`ENCUMB. .Oc '.CO .00 .CO .00 .00 ..CO .00 000
BALANCE 289394.35 59686.51 620639.84 .1.10 .00 .00 .CO .00 96020.15
FINANCE - ASSESSING
BUDGET 3oC30.00 30.00 17e215.0c .00 .00 .00 .CO *Co. 209215.00
-C MONTH 195.12 . .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 .CO 195.12
Y T 0 341.46 .00 .CC .CO .00 .Oc .00 .00. 341.46
ENCUMB .00 .CC .CC .00 .CO 000 .CC 000 .00
BALANCE 20688054 30.00 170215.0c .CO 000 .00 .00 _ .00 199933.56
E
.. r
PAGE 2
S 1. A N I H C N V
S L N w A R V B U D G E T R E P O R T
FEBRUARY 29. 19d4
• GLKERAL FUND EXPENSE •
LEGAL
BUDGET .00 .00 270000.00 .00 .00 .00 .c0 .00 21.000.00
C MONTH .CC .CC .0C .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
IF T O .00 .00 .00 .CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
ENCUMB .CC .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 000
BALANCE .00 .00 216000.t[ .00 .00 .00 .CO .00 219000.00
ENGINEERING/PLANNINGilCNING
BUCGET .00 100.00 30150.CC .00 .00 .00 .00 000 3.210.00
C MONTH .00 .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .00 .00
Y T 0 .(I C .00 .CC .01) .00 .00 .00 .CO 000
ENCU048 .0C .CC .00 .CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
BALANCE .00 100.00 3.150.0C .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7.250.00
CITY BUIL01AGS
BUDGET 239250.00 650.0C 809700.00 400.00 .00 .00 .CO .CO 105•X0.00
C MONTH 10665.26 67.90 6.915.31 179.95 .00 .00 .00 .CO 0.846.42
Y T 0 3.042.90 67.90 11 803.39 119.95 .00 .00 .00 .00 1S•OS4014
ENCUMB .CC .00 .0C .00 .00 .00 .CO .00 .00
BALANCE 200207.10 T82.10 !8.896.61 22C.C5 .00 .00 .00 .00 90910.86
CIVIL OEFENSE
BUOGET 18060.00 250.00 2.34C.0C 675.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 21.625.00
C PGNTH 19482.0C .00 94.60 200.00 .00 .00 .00 .C9 !•716.60
Y 1 O 2.891.30 .CC 111.3C 225.10 .00 000 .00 .00 3.226.60
ENCUMB .CC .CO .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
BALANCE 159468.7C 250.00 2.219.70 450.00 .00 000 .CO .CO LO OSB.40
POLICE PROTECTICN
BUDGET 433.57C.01 89303.00 289733.00 1#344.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 471.950.00
C MONTH 28913t.11 345.61 1.349.1` .00 .00 .00 .00 .CO 29430.81
v 1 0 559227.41 19175.61 1.444.15 .CO .00 .00 .CO .00 57.847.23
ENCUMB .00 .CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO 000
BALANCE 3780342.53 7.127.39 219286.85 1.344.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 414.102.77
1
l
1 '
1
l
s
PAGE 1
S 1. A N I H O N v
S L " M A R v B U O C E T R E P O R 1
FEBRUARY 299 1984
j • GLAERAL FUND EXPENSE •
BUDGET .CC .00 .00 .00 .00 000 000 9c0 000
C MONTH .00 .CC .CC .CO 00 .00 .OD .00 .00
v 1 O .9c .00 .CC .00 .00 .Oc .00 .00 .00
ENCUMB .00 .00 .CC AO .10 .00 .CO .CO 000
BALANCE .00 .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO 000 .00
FIRE PROTEC71Ck
BUDGET 245.540.00 5.535.00 11922C.00 89680.00 .00 900 .00 .00 270.975.00
C MONTH 15.453.38 950.27 839.16 151.90 .00 .00 .00 .CO 17.394.11
9 T O 27.9C3.SQ 950021 19039.16 151.90 .00 .00 .00 .CO 30045.23
ENCUMB .00 .00 .CC .00 .CC .00 .00 .CO .00
BALANCE 217.636.10 40564.73 109180.84 89520.10 00 .00 .00 .00 240.929.71
INSP-BLOG/PL EC/FTG/FEALIh
BUDGET 12010C.00 75.00 475.0C .CO .00 .00 .CO .c0 12.6SO.00
C MONTH 801.13 .00 55.0C .CO 000 .00 .00 .CO 926.13
v T 0 10885.23 .00 55.CC .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.940.23
ENCUMB .CC .00 .CC no .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
BALANCE 100214.77 75.00 470.CC .CO .00 .00 .00 .CO 10.7C9.71
ANIMAL CONIRCL
BUDGET .Oc 50.00 1•100.cc .CO .00 .00 .00 000 1.150.00
C MGNTH .Oc 35.15 96.75 .CO .00 .00 .CO .00 132.SO
v T 0 .0c 35.75 96.75 no .00 000 .00 .CO 132.50
ENCUMB .00 .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 .CO .Co '00
BALANCE .00 14.25 10603.25 .C? .130 .00 .CO .00 1.617.50
PUBLIC WORKS
BUDGET 162.lOC.0c 490150.00 36.500.0C .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 261.750.00
C MGNTH 1396C5.6C 69117.86 3420.64 .CO .03 .00 .00 .CO 23.344.30
v T 0 25.040.68 6.717.86 5,512.12 .CO .00 .00 .c0 .00 37.270.67
ENCUMB .0C .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .60 .00
BALANCE 1570059.32 42.432.14 30.981.87 co. .00 .00 .00 000 230.419.33
t
l ..
t.
L _ i
T _ _
PAGE 4
S I. A N I H D N Y
,S L r A R r B U D G E T R E P O R I
FEBRUARY 29. 1984
e G1ACRAL FUNO EXPENSE •
PUBLIC bORKS-PAIKT/RfPeIR ECOP
" BUDGET 30061500 46esc0.00 4.1CO.CC 10750.00 .01 .00 *CC eco 63.325000
C"MONTH 2.262.0.1 1.318.23 10CI9'.SC .CO .00 .00 000 '.CO 4.640.64
V T D 30d86.7E 1.378.23 1•[19.9( .^0 .CO .00 .CO .00 692E6.91
ENCUMB .C!' .00 .CC •:00 .00 .00 000 eco 000
BALANCE 26.786.22 459421.11 3.080.1[ • 1075C.00 .00 .00 000 .00 179038.09
TREE. C NEE[ CARE
BUDGET 149650.00 500:[0 1.250.0E 65C.00 .Oc .00 .00 .00 119050.00
C MONTH 703.68 .cc - 121.0[ .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO 824.68
Y T C 1.208.94 .CC 121.C( .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 19329.94
•ENCUMB .00 .00 .CC .00 .CC .00 900 000 .00
BALANCE 139441:ot 500.00 1.129.00 650.00 000 000 000 .CO 159120.06,
PARKS•
BUGGET 210C5C.00 20850.00 3.8CO.CC 19000.00 .00 00 .00 eco 3497CO.00
C MONTH 10053.42 44.2.5 375.41 .CO .00 .00 .00 Soo 19413.08
-V T D 2.329.59 44•.25 315.41 .CO .00 .00 900 .CO 2e749.2S
'ENCUMB At .CC .CC .CO .09 .00 .00 .00 .07
BALANCE 240720.41 20805.15 3.424.55 1000C.00 .00 .00 .CO .CO 319950.15
TOTAL EXPENCIIURES
BUDGET 3700100.00 930693.00 480608.00 140499.00 150000.00 .00 1459000.00- 4429500.CO- 4S9000.00-
C ,MONTH 730991.65 70922.36 10024.72 531.85 10731.00 .00 20084.E0- to 95.116.82
v T-O 1390592.39 80416.11 169342.75 556.85 70731.00 .00 210883.00- 000 1699756.14
ENCUMB .00 900 .00 .00 .00 .00 .CO .00 .00
BALANCE 2310107.61 850276.89 320265.21 130942.15 70269.70 .00 142.117.00- 4429%OC.CO- 2149750.14-
• GEALRAL RESERVE SPECIAL FUW0 REVENUE 0
BUDGET .CO .00 '.CC- .CO :00 .00 .00 .00 000
C MONTH CC. .CC .CC ^0 .00 .00 .CO .CO .07
1 T 0' .00 .CC .CC .c0 .00 .00 .CO .00 900
ENCUMD .00 .CC .CC .00 .00 .CC .00 .CO .00
BALANCE .CO .CC .CC .70 .00 .00 .00 .CO .00
• GENERAL RESERVE SPECIAL FUND EXPENSE •
TOTAL EXPENETTLRES
BUDGET .0C ..00 .0C .00 .CO .00 .CO .CO 000
C MONTH .^C .CG .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .00 .00
♦••T D .00 .00 .CC .00 .00 000 .CO -.00 .00
EF:CUMB .00 .00 .CC .CO .00 .co :CO .00 000
BALANCE - .0: :00 .0C .CO .00• .00 .CO .CO .00
( • REVENUE SHARING FUND REVENUE •
(
-BUDGET '.00 331000.00 .0C .00 .: .00 .00 .CO 110000.00 449000.00
C 'MONTN .'OC .00 .CC .00 .00 At .CO :00 000
Y 9 0 .00 .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
ENCUMB .00 .00 .00 .CO .07 .00 .CO .00' .00
BALANCE. 9oT 33900C.CC .CC .00 .00 ..00 .00 11.000.00 449000.00
• RE4kNUE SHARING FUND EXPENSE •
BUDGET .00' .07 .0C .00 .00- .00 .CO 000 909
C MONTH .0C .CO Of .00 .C7 .00 :00 .00 -000
Y T 0 .00 .CC .CC. .07 .�0.>; .00 .00 .00.,.1; 000
f
S 1. A N I H O N V
S, l M 10 A R V ® L 0 G E T R E P C P T
FEBRUARY 290 I1.84
REVENUE SHARING
BUDGET .00 on BCC, .00 44.006a00, 000 e00 .00 440000.00
C MONTH .CC .00 .cc .00 .OQ, .00' .CO .,co, 000
.00 ".CC .CC .CO• .79;' .00 .00 .00 .00
ENCUMB .Oc .00 .00 .00 000 eC0 .CQ .CO .015
BALANCE e0C .00 .CC .00 449000.00 .00 000 oC0 440000000
TOTAL EXPEAGIILRES
BUDGET" .o o; 23.0ce-ce- .CC .00 440000.00 -• 000 .00• 11000Oe00- 000,
C MONTH •OC cc .00. .CO .00' 000 .00 000 .00
v 1,0" .O Q' .00 000` .c l! .cc .00 .CO eC0 •00
r. ENCUMB .0C "ice'- .CC. .00 .00 .00 .CO. Co o 000
BALANCE .00 330000.00- .CC .CO 4400.00:00 .00 .Carr ll•000.40- .00
• MS• CONSTUCTIW FLAO REVENUE •
BUCGET .00 .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .00' .CO .00
C' .0
MONTH .00 .00 .00 .CO .00• 000- .00 0 .00"
V.T-O .00 .00 .CC .00 .03 .00 .CO e00 .06
ENCUMB .CC .cc .00 .CO .00 .Oar' .00 .CO 400
BALANCE- ' .cc .00 .CC .CO .CO .00 .CO .00 e00
• OSA CGNSTUCIION FUNO EXPENSE 0
TOTAL EXDENCITLRES `
BUCGET .9C ..CC .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .00 .03
C'•MONTH .00 .00 .00 CO. .09 .00 eCO .CO .00
V. T'-0 . .QC .00' .CC, .00 .CO 407 oC0 .CO 400
ENCUM$ .0C .00 .CC .00 .00 .cc .00 000 .00
BALANCE •CO .00 .CC .JO .30 .00 oCc .CO .09
• CChM OEV BLOCK'GkANT FUND REVENUE •
BUCGET `.09 .CO• .00 .CO .00 .00 000 400 000'
C MONTH .00 .00 .CC : .00 .00 .00 CO• '.00'
r T,
.cc .CC .00 .0? .90 .00 .CC eC0 .00
ENCUMB' - ' .00 .0[ .CC :CO' ic0 .00 .CO .CO .00
BALANCE .00 .cc .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO .CO .00
• CCFP DEW BLOCK GRANT FUND EXPENSE •
BLOCK GRANT _
BUDGET .00 •.00 .CC :CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
C MONTH .00 00 .00• .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 AD
T T 0 .00 .00 :OC .00' .00 .00" .00' .Cc .00
ENCUMB 00 .00 .00 .CO .00 ecc .00 .00 .00
( BALANCE .00 .00 .CC .C7 .00 .00 oCC 0Cc 000
TOTAL-EXPEACITURES
1 BUDGET .0C .00 .f+c• .CO .OR .00 .CO .CO .00
C MONTH eOC. .cc .CC .00' .00 .00 .00 4Cc -eO0
T T 0 .00 000. .O C. .CO' .00 .00 .00' .00 .00
1' ENCUMB .00 .00 .CC 000 .00 o00 .CO 4Cc .09
BALANCE 000 .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 .00. .00• 007
_•`,HRA FUND REVENUE 0
'` 1
BUDGET 7.SCO.cc ".cc .00 .CP .00 .Oc- :CO .CO` 7o900.00
! C MONTH .00 :00 I....CC. .CO .00' .00 000 .CO 000
V-•T O .00 .00 .CC .!`0 .013 .00 .CO`' Cc
PAGE ti = rte.
s T. A K 1 H C, N Y •-
S L M ►I A R V e 6 U G E 1 R E P C A T
FEBRUARY 29. IS84
- • HRA FUKO EXPENSE • '
-PERSONAL SERVICES
BUCGEI 59000.00 .011 20500.CC .c0 .00 .00 •.00 .00 79500.00
C MON114 .11c .co 10.0c .^0 .00 .00 .c0 000 10.00
V I.0 .CC .CC t0.cf .0^ .0o 1.00 .00 .CO 10.00
ENCUMB 600 .CO .00 .CO .00 ; .; ,•, �.,.00 .CO a00 e00
BALANCE 5.000.0^. .00 20490.CC .c0 .70 .00 oC0 oC0 7.490.00
GENERAL LECAI !
BUDGET .011 .00 .00 00 .cc -.00 .CC 000 '•.00
C MONTH .00 .CC .CC .00 .00 .00 • .00 .CO •.00
V 1 0 .oC .00 .CC .CM .00 .Oc .c0 .00' .00
ENCUMB .^C .CC .00. .00 no .00 .CC .t0 .00
BALANCE .00 .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .'00
• r 1
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
BUCGET 20500411- .00 29500.CC .00 .00 .00 .00 .CO .00
C MONTH .00 .00 10.00 00 .00 • .00 .00 .00 10000
V T 0.. 000 .CC 10.Oc .'90- .00 11 .00 .CO .00 10.00
ENCUMB .011 .CO .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO -.00 .00
BALANCE 205CC.00- .00 2.490.CC .CO .00 .00 .co .CO -10.00-
• CAFITAL EQUIPMENT FUND REVENUE •
BUCGET .00 .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 859000.00 040 85.000.00
C-MONTH .0c ".0c :O0 .00 .00 .00 .CO .00 .00
V I'D .0c .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .001 eco 000
ENCUMB .0c .00 .00 .CO .00 .00 .00 .c0 .00
BALANCE .CC .CC .00 .00 .00 .00 859000.tO .c0 85.060.0')
•.CAFITAL EQUIPMENT FUND EXPENSE,•
ANTICIPATED REVENUE
BUOGET .0c .00 .00 .CO .00 .00 -.00 .00 .00.
C MONTH .JO .00 .cc .`CO ;.00 .00 :[O .00 1;00
:CO .CC ':CO' ''.00 .00 .CO .c0 ..00
ENCUMB .00 .00 .00 .c1 .00 •.00 .CO .00 .00
BALANCE .CC .00 .CC .QO .,)0 .00 .CO .110 40
APFRCPRIATICNS
BUDGET .011 .CC -.Of .110 .00 .00 .Cc .00 .00
C,PONTH .00 ..0c eCc 834.75 .00 .00- .00 .00 834.:75
V,B,D a
00 .00 .CC 834.75 •00 .00 .c0 .c0 83405
ENCUMS .00 .00 .00 .co -.03 .00 .00 .CO 000
BALANCE .00 -.00 ..00 834.75- .00 ,.CC to .00 834.1s-
TOTAL EXPENCITURES
BUDGET .00 .00 .011 .00 :CO .00 85.000:00- .00 8500c0.00-
1 C,.MONTH ACC .00 .00 834.75 eC0 .00 oC0 •CO 8D4.75
,V:T ,0 .00 .CO .00 : 834.15 .00 .00 .00 .00 834 is
ENCUMB e0C .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .00 oto :OA
l BALANCE •.011 *cc .Oc 834.75- 000 .00 as.000.00-. .c0 850834.75-
^• .OEE1. SERV FUND CERT INDEB7 REVENUE •
BUDGET .00 .00 .CC .c0 :.00 .00 .00 e00 .00
C.MONTH .0! .CC .00 .00 .10 `�00 .CC eC0 000
V T 0 .Oc .CC .CC .CO ..00 ,. .00 .00 .c0 .00
ENCUMB -00 .cC ..Cc .CO .0o .00 :CO .00 .00
• • P� r j
a T. A N i H G N v
S l P P A R V B L 0 6 F 1 R E P O F 1
FEBRUARV 199 IS84
• LEET SIRV FUND CERT INCE81 EXPENSE •
TOTAL EXPENCIILRFS
BUDGET .00 ..Cf .cc .CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
C MONTH .00 .CC .CC .CO .00 .CC .CO .CO .00
V 1 0 .00 .CC .CC .00 40 .00 .CC .CO 000
ENCUM8 .Oc .CC .Cc .CD .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
BALANCE .0C .00 .CC .00 .00 .CC .00 .00 000
• IPFMCVEPENTS - HIGHCREST REVENUE •
BUDGET .00 .CC .CC .CO .00 .00 .CO .00 .00
C MONTH .00 .00 .00 .c0 .00 .6o .CO .M .00
V 1 0 .0' .CC .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
ENCUMB .0C .CC .Cc .Co .CO .00 .00 .00 .00
BALANCE .00 .00 .CC .SO 00 .00 .CO .00 .00
• 1'FRCVE PENT S - HIGHCREST EXPENSE •
TOTAL EXPENOIILRES
BUDGET 000 .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
C PONTH .Oc .CO .CC .!0 .110 .00 .CO .CO 000
V T 0 .0f .CC .CC .CO .00 000 .00 .Co .00
ENCUMB .0c .00 .00 .c0 .00 000 .00 .00 000
BALANCE .CC .00 .cc .(11) .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
• IMPROVENENIS bCNOS-1963 G 1968 REVENUE •
BUDGET .0C .CC .cc .CO .0o .00 .CO .00 .00
C MONTH .cc .00 .^c .00 .00 .00 .c0 .EO .00
Y T 0 .CC .CC .Cc .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
ENCUMB .00 .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 .CO AO .00
BALANCE .CC .00 .CC .00 co. .00 .CQ .CO .00
• IMFROVEMENIS OCNOS-1963 G 1568 REVENUE •
BCNOS - 1967 C IS68
BUDGET .0C .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .co .00
C MONTH .CC .CC .CC 00 .00 .CC .CO .CO .00
V T 0 .00 .Cc .CC .CO 000 .CO .CO .CO .00
ENCUMB .cc .00 .0C .C^ .00 .CC .00 .CO .00
BALANCE .00 .CC .CC .00 .00 .00 000 .00 .00
TOTAL EXPENOIILRES
BUDGET .00 .QO .CC .01) .00 .Oc .00 .CO 000
C MONTH .00 .oC .00 .CO .00 .00 000 000 .00
r V T 0 .00 .00 .CC .Cl) .00 .00 .CO .CO .09
( ENCUMB .00 .CC .CC .00 .00 .00 .00 .c0 .00
BALANCE 000 .00 .CC .CO .00 000 .CO 000 000
1 • IPFRV-18.01 S.A OFFICE PARK REVENUE •
(
' BUDGET .0c .CC .Oc .c0 000 000 .00 .CO .00
( C MONTH .00 .00 .00 .CO .00 .00 .00 000 .00
V T O .CC .00 .CC .10 .00 .00 .CO .Co .00
ENCUMB .00 .0C .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 ".00 .00
1 BALANCE 000 .00 .CC .10 000 .00 .00 600 .00
PAGE B
S T. A N T H D N v
S 'L V M A R v B U D G E T R E_P 0 R T
FEBRUARY 299 1984 -
• IMFRV-78.01 S.A OFFICE PARK EXPENSE •
TCTAi EXPENCITLRES
BUDGET eCC .00 .CC .00 000 000 eco 000 000
C PCNTH .00 .CC .CC .CO .00 .00 .CO 000 000
v T IF .00 000 .CC .CO :00 .00 oCO oCo 000
ENCUMB'. eCC eCC .9C " .CO 00Q .00 000 *Co. 000
BALANCE 900 .00 eCC .00 000 000 .00 eco 000
• I"FRCVEME'NI 8ONOS - 1913 REVENUE •;
BUOG�Ef .00 .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO• 000
C MCNIM •0C e0C .CC .CO .00 o00 .CO ecol 000
v T• 0 .0^ .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO Coi 000
-ENCUMB eCC Oct) .00 .00 .00 000 .00 0co, :00
BALANCE' •00 000 .CC .CO 000 •00 000 000' 000
0-IMFROVEPENT BOAOS - 1971 EXPENSE R
BUDGET .cc 000 .CC .00 .00 000 000 eco 000
C MONTH 000 ' .00 eCC .CO. .00 000 000 .co .00
Y,T 0 .00 .00 ,c .00 .00 .Cc :CO CO'. 000
ENCUM9 .00 .00 .0 .CO 400 000 .00 oCIO 000
BALANCE 000 000 .CC .00 40 .00 000 000 000
BONOS.- 1913
BUDGET .00 .00 .GC .CO .00 .00 .00 000 .00
C MONTH .00 .00 117.45 68.471.25 .00 eCC .CO .00 68.508:70
Y.1 0' e0C .CC 111.4°. !@.471.25 ic0 •00 eCO 0.00 600SEBe'10
ENCUMB 000 .00 .CC .CO -.00 .CO .CO .CO .00
BALANCE .cc 000 117.45- 68.471.25- .00 000 eC0 000 600508010-
TCTAL EXPEhCITLRES
BUDGET .00 •.00 :0C .00 .00 -.00 .CC .CO', 000
C MONTH one .CO 117.4 t8.471.25 .00 000 000 000 68.508010
vij 0 • .0C .00 LIT.45 680411.25 .o0 .00 .CO 000, 60.588077
ENCUMB 000 .00 .CC .00 .co .00 .00 .CO .00
BALANCE .0C .CC 117.45- t80471:25- .00 000 .00 000 680500.70-
• IMFROVEMENTS - 1916 REVENUE •
BUDGET .00, .00 :OC .00 :00 000 eco .CO .00
C.-MONTH .00 .00 .00 .CO 000 .00 .CO o00 .00
v T'0 ' .CC' -.00 .00 .00 .00 000 000 000 000.
ENCUMB .00 .0[ .CC .CO .07 .00 .CO .00 000
BALANCE .0C .00 :C( .c0 'rC .00 .Cc. .00 000'
e IMFROVEMENTS -4976 EXPENSE •
TOTAL EXPENCITLRES
BUDGET .0C .CC .CC :06 .73, .00 .CO .CO 000
C MONTH .00 .00 ecc , .CO .00 000 000 .00 .00
t v T D .Oc AC .00 .00 000 000 000 ♦00 •00
ENCUMB .0C .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 000 sco 000
BALANCE .00 .00 ..CC. ` .CO .00 .00 .CO 000 .00
l • REVOLVING IMPROVEMENT FUND REVENUE .•
PAGE 9
A N I H � N >+
S L M M A R B U O G E I R E P 0 R 1 ,
iLCRUARY 19. 1984
BUDGET .0C .CO .CC .00 .00 .00 eco .00 000
C MONTH .CC .CC .0C .CO .00 .00 .00 .CO .00
v 1 0 .GC .00 .CC .C7 .00 .CC .CO .CO .00
ENCUM8 .0c .CC Of .j0 .00 .CC .c0 .CO .00
BALANCE .00 .CO .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 o00 .00
• REWUIYiNG IMYRCYEMENT FUND EXPENSE •
^-
• BUDGET .CC .00 .C[ � .00 .00 CO .CO .00
C MONTH .CC .CO .CC .CO .00 .00 oco .CO 000
V Y D ' *cc .10 L, .CC .CO .011 .00 .CO .CO .00
ENCUMB .CC .CC .CC .00 .00 .CC .c0 ocb .00
BALANCE .00 .CC .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 000 .00
t
BUCGET .00 .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 .CO .CO 000
C MONTH .00 .00 .CC .CO .03 .00 .CO o00 .00
v 1 0 .CC occ .CC .00 .91 .00 .CO oco 000
ENCUMB .0; .CC .CC .CO 000 .00 000 .00 .00
BALANCE CC .CC 00 .00 .CC .CO .CO .00
� i•
/ BUDGET .00 .00 .CC .oQ .DO .CO .00 .CO .00
C MONTH .00 .CC .CC .00 .10 .00 .CO .CO 000
Y T 0 .Oc .CC .CC .CO .00 .CC .00 .00 .00
ENCUMB .CO .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
BALANCE .^t .CC .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 .CO .00
BUCGET .00 .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .00 oC0 .00
C MONTH .AC .CC .0C .CC .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
v 1 0 .0C .CC .CC .rn .131 .00 .c0 .t0 .00
ENCUM8 .CC .00 .00 .CO .00 .00 .CO .CO .CO
BALANCE .0C .00 .CC .CO .Cc .100 .CO .00 000
BUDGET .00 .00 .0C .CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
C MONTH .CC .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 oC0 .CO 001)
v t c .CC .00 .CC .00 00 .00 .00 .CO 000
ENCUMB .0C .00 .00 .CO .0C .00 .CO .00 .00
BALANCE •Ci .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO 000
l i
1 - i
l �
PAGE 10
s T. A N I a 0 N v
"S L M M A R V B U D G E T R E P D P T
FECRUARY 2So 1584
• RE%ULVING I.MPRCVEMENT FUND EXPENSE •
BUDGET .00 .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
C MGNTH .CO .0C or .00 .CO .00 22e877.CO .CO 22.871.00
tl T 0 .0: .CC .CC .CO .00 .00 229877.CC .CO 22.871.00
ENCUMB 000 .00 .0C .CO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
BALANCE .00 .00 .CC .^.0 .00 .00 229CII.CC- .CO 22.877.00-
TCTAL EXPENCITLRES
BUDGET .00 .00 :OC .00 .00 .00 - eco .CO 000
C PCNTH 000 .CC .CC oco 009- .00 22.811.CO 000 22.837.00
tl 0 0 .1317 . .0^ . .CC .CO .0C .00 220877.00 .CO 22471.00
ENCUMB .00 .00 ^C .^O .00 .00 .CO .00 .00
BALANCE 000 .00 .CC .QO .09 .00 22.817.00- .00 229871.00-
• SEWER FUND REVENUE •
BUDGET .00 .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 3050640.00 .CO. 305.640.00
C MONTH .00 at .CC .CO .00 .00 .DO 000 000 '
tl'T D .07 .00 .CC . .
00 00 .00 .CO .CO .00
ENCUMB .CC .CO .CC .co .00 .00 .CC .CO .00
BALANCE .Oc .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 3059640.00 .00 3039640.00
• SEWER FUND EXPENSE •.
I
APPACPRIATICKS
BUDGET 5196 75.CC 60350.00 33lo650.00 .00 .00 to .CO .CO 3899615.00
I C MONTH 40009.59 .55 966.41 . .CO .00 .00 .00 000 69916.55
AI ,4.0. 7.178.31 .55 10Sd6.7S .CO .00 eCC .CO .CO 89705.73
ENCUMB .0C ACC .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 .000 600
BALANCE 449496.61 60349.45 3300063.21 .^.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 380.909.27 �
MAL EXPENCITURES I
BUDGET. 5lo675.0C 69350:OC 3319650.CC .CO .00 .00 3059640.00- 000 849035.00
-C .MONTH 40CCS.5S •.55 966.41 00 :01) .00 .CO CO): 40916055
tl 1 0 79178.31 055 10586.75 :CO 00 .00 600 .CO 80165.13
1 ENCUma, .00 .00 .^0 .^.0 .00 .00 .CC 000 .00
BALANCE 440496.E1 19349.45 3300063.21 .70 00 .00 305064O.CO- .CO 159249.21
• MAIER FUND REVENUE •
f BUDGET .00 .00 .CC .CO .CC .00 215965C.CO .00 21508•.0..00
C MONTH ..00 .00 .CC .00 .00 .00 3S.CQ .CO 35.00
V T D .00 .OD :0c . .CO 00 000 35.00 000 35.01)
ENCUMB ..00 40 .0C .CO .00 000 - :c0 .CO .00
l BALANCE .00 oOC :OC :CO .00 .00 2150815.00 '000 2150815.00
•
WATER FUND EXPENSE
C :. APPRDPRIATACKS
-,BUDGET •B5o595.0o 130510.00 1010190.00 60000.00 .03 .00 .00 .00 2060355.00
y C. 04CNTH 60455.SE 591.42 10312.22 19682.16 .00 •00 .CO .CO 169C41e18
/ ( tl T O 130543.15 591:42 120L.t.3.21 s 19682.16 .00 - .00 .CO .00 27.829.94
I ENCUMB .00 :CO :Cr .00 :00 ' .00 .CO :C0 .00
BALANCE 729051:85 129978.5E ago I76:'75 40)17.84 ' .00 ; t. .00 DO .00 1180525.06
I
TOTAL EXPENCITLRES'
-BUDGET' 850595.00 130510.0C 1019190.0C 6000C.CO .oa 2159850.00- .00 904i5.00-
L C MGNTH 69455.9E 591.42 70112.22 1*682.16 .00 .00 35.CO- .CO 16000608
tl T O 130543.15 591.42 12.C17.21 1.682.16 .00 - .00 35.00- .00 27.794.94
PAGE Il
S T. A N T H O N Y
S L M P A A V B U 0 i E t R E P O R T
FEBRUARY 29. 1986
• 106%ESTME%l FU%C REVENUE • r
BUDGET .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 r, .CO .00 r
C MCNIN .00 .CC .CC co. .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
V t 0 00 .CC .CC .Cc .00 .00 .co .00 .00)
ENCUMB .00 .00 - .00 000 .@? .00 .CC .00 .00
BALANCE .00 .00 .CC 900 .00 .00 .00 .CO 000
• INYESTPENT FUND EXPENSE •
TOTAL EXPEADIILRES
BUDGET .0c .CC .Oc .00 000 000 000 .CO 000
C MONTH .0C .00 .CC .CO .00 .00 .00 .CO 000
V T 0 .0C .CC .00 .CO .0? 000 .CO .CO .00 •-
ENCUMB .QS .CC- *CC .CO .00 000 .00 .CO 000 r
BALANCE .00 .00 .CC .CO .00 000 .00 .00 .00
• PEIIAEMENT FUNC REVENUE •
BUDGET .CC *cc .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
C MONTH .0C .CC .CC .CO .00 .CC .CO .00 .00
V T 0 .^" .GO .CC .00 .00 .^.0 .CO .CC .00
ENCUMB .0c .CC .CC .Co .00 000 .00 .00 .00
BALANCE .0C .00 .CC .CO .O0 .00 .00 .Co .00
• REIIREPE14T FUNC EXPENSE •
TOTAL EXPENCITLRES
BUDGET .0C .CC .CC .;0 .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
C NCNIH .l)0 .CC .CC .00 .00 .00 .CO .CO .QO
Y T 0 ^= .07 .0c .00 .00 .CC .CO .c0 .00
ENCU148 .CC .CC .GC .CO .00 .00 .00 .CO .00
BALANCE .co 000 .CC .CO .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
• CC►01NEC TOTAL REVENUES •
BUCGET 73105CC.0C 6C.000.00 24C.700.0C .00 .00 .00 751x490.00 45395CO.CO 2243@190.00
C MCNTH .0C 1.931.00 4.L93.8S .CO .00 .00 29119.60 .00 8.244.69
Y T 0 .0: 2@267.25 71293.BS .CO .10 .00 2091E.00 .c0 12.419.14
ENCUM8 .0: .CO .CC .CO .00 000 .CC .CO .00
BALANCE 73795CG.7C 57.732.75 233.406.11 .CO .00 .00 7489512.CC 453@50040 2230.110.86
• CC08INE0 TCTAL EAPENSES •
SUGGET 1242 @97C.0C 14C.613.CC 7249648.00 20.499.^.0 59.000.00 .00 .CO .CO 2187.730.00
C MONTH 84 @457.26 10 0445.33 1ti.624.65 71052C.C1 7.731.70 .00 229877.Co .CO 216.655.29
Y 1 0 160.317.93 11@215.33 379364.13 71.545.01 7@73100 .00 22@077.00 .co 3110106.40
ENCUM8 .00 .CC .CC .CO .00 .00 .CO .CO .00
BALANCE LC82.656.C'1 129 0331.67 607 9283.87 519046.01- 51.269.00 .00 226877.00- .CO 1876.623.60
t
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
i PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES-
June 19 ,-, 1984
1The meeting was called to order at 7: 30. P.M. by Chairman. Zawis.lak.
2
- 3Present for roll call : Jones, Bowerman, Zawislak, Franzese, Bjorklund,
4 Hansen,. and Wagner..
5
6Also present: David Childs , City Manager
7
8flotion by Commissioner Franzese and seconded by Commissioner Bjorklund
9to approve as submitted the minutes for the Planning Commission meet-
10ing held May 15, 1984.
11
12Motion carried unanimously.
13
14 Commissioner Wagner will report the June 19th Commission minutes to the
15Council at -their June 26th meeting.
16 .
17The Cha=irman explained the .procedure-,,,which would be -followed that even-
18ing in conducting the public hearings listed on the agenda.
19
20At 7: 35 P.M. , he opened the hearing on the request from Mike McGinn
21to subdivide without platting and the variance necessary for a lot
22width less than the 75 feet required by the City Zoning Ordinance, for
23Lot. 9 , Block 4 , Moundsview Acres .
24
25The Chairman read the notice of the hearing which had been published
26June 6th and mailed to all property owners of record within 350 feet of
27the subject property. - No one present reported failure to receive the
28not.ice or objected to its content.
29
30Because the land description of the two 62 . 25 feet wide. by 296 feet
311ong lots which would result from the split would be simple and uncom-
32Plicated, Mr. Childs anticipates the County wouldn' t require the property
33to be platted. The Manager reiterated that .a precedent for this type
340f lot split- had:'been established. in the- Mounds View Acres- area,
35including . the . adjoining property.
36 -
37The . applicant said he--had gone to all the homes in- the - 4000 block of
38Fordham- Drive. and .gotten the signatures-- on a 'document favoring the lot
3.9split and variance.. Mr. -McGinn assured.- the. Commission members. that
.40all other setbacks would be in conformance with the City Ordinance,
41except the width which the- ordinance requires would be 75 feet wide.
42
4-3Walter Bochnack, who owns the lots to the rear of the subject property,
• 44Was. present and indicated he would not- oppose 'the lot split as proposed.
4.5-He- was asked whether he planned-to develop that property..and the response
46was . that. "there was_ a problem inrthat he didn't own. the property in
47the, middle".. Mr: Bochnack was urged by the Commissioners to work with
48staff to see if some method of developing the lots he owns coul-dn' t
49be worked out.
f
-2-
1 Mr. McGinn was accompanied- to the meeting by two neighbors who chose..
2 not to speak on the request. The Manager indicated receiving no calls •
3 on the request and the hearing was closed at 7: 45 P.M. for Commission . t
4 consideration. f
5 f
6 Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Jones .to
7 recommend Council approval of the request from Mike McGinn, 4021 Fordham ' .
8 Drive, to subdivide .without platting, .Lot .9 , Block 4 , Mounds View Acres ?
9 (*described as 4017 Fordham-Drive) into two single family residential
10 lots, approximately 62. 25 feet wide by 296 feet in length, totalling !
11 18, 400 square feet each, and to grant the necessary variance to' the `City
12 Zoning Ordinance which requires a minimum lot width of 75 feet, finding
.13 that: ;
14 � 1
15 1. No opposition to the request was demonstrated at either the May 15th
16 or June 19th considerations or through communications with City staff. ',
lg2. The applicant had secured the signatures of his neighbors on a docu
19 ment which indicated approval of the proposed lot split and variance.
20
21 3. The unique physical attributes of this property and the adjoining I
22 lots, as well as the fact that the property to rear remain un-
23 developed along with the fact that a precedent for similar lot
24 splits exist in Mounds View Acres and on the adjoining properties
25 where quality homes have been constructed by the applicant.
26
27 4. Platting the property would be expensive and cumbersome. • .`
28
29 Motion carried' unanimously.
30
31 At 7: 53 P.M. , the Chairman read the notice of the hearing to consider
32 a petition from Mike Pribula, 3570 Buchanan Street N.E. , to allow the
33 construction of a 36 foot wide single family home on the 50 foot wide
34 by 125 foot long vacant lot at 3231 Roosevelt Street N.E. , which would
35 require a one foot sideyard variance to the City Ordinance requirement
36 for 15 foot sideyard setbacks . The notice had been published June. 6th
37 and mailed to all property owners of record within 200 feet of the
38 subject property . No one present reported failure to receive the notice
39 or objected to its content.
40
41 Mr. Childs confirmed that the lot is a vacant lot of record which is con-
42 sidered by the City to be buildable under Section 12, Subd. 1. 2 of the
43 Zoning Ordinance . The Manager reported receiving no objections to th_e _
44 request, except a call from the neighbor to the south who felt much
45 better when she learned of the 10 ' setback on the south side and that' ,
46 the garage .would also be on the north side. Mr. Pribula indicated he
47 was building the home for his own use.
48
49 The sideyard setbacks would -be 10 feet on the south, leaving- 15 feet
50 between houses, and 4 feet on the north, leaving 19 feet between houses,
51 according to Mr. Pribula who indicated there is a .house across the
52 street very similar. to _the one he wants to.build. He also told the Com-
53 missioners that the existing trees on his property. would not interfere-
54 with his constructing the home as he proposed. .. Mr. Childs indicated'' the
55 proposed structure would be in alignment with the homes on each side
56 which are approximately 25 and 22 feet from their front property lines.
t
i
-3-
• 1 There was� no one present to speak .either for or against. the proposal,
2 and ,the Chairman closed the hearing at 8:02 P.M. , for the Commission-
3 consideration and action.
4 -
5 Motion,.by .Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Jones- to.
6 recommend the Council grant a one foot sideyard setback variance which
7 would allow Mike Pribula - to construct the single family dwelling he
8 proposes on the vacant lot at 3231 Roosevelt Street N.E, , finding that:
9
10 1. The proponent had developed a proposal which would conform to the
11 wishes of his neighbor to the south related to the placement of
12 his garage.
13
14 2 . There was no other opposition from adjoining property owners.
15
16 3. Several lots and homes of the same size have been developed on that
17 street.
18
19 4. The unique characteristics - of this lot with the extended shape and
20 no street address would appear to constitute a hardship for the
21 applicant to . construct his home according to the Ordinance requirements ., ll
22
23 Motion carried unanimously.
24
25 At 8 :07 P.M. , Chairman Zawislak opened the hearing to consider a petition.
26 from Edwin and Alyce Brown for a variance to the City Zoning Ordinance -
27 requirements which would allow them to reconstruct. their home at. 2702
28 33rd Avenue N.E which was severely damaged in the April tornado, with
29 an entryway which would be two feet closer to Belden Drive than its
30 existing distance of 14 . 2 feet. He read the notice which had been
31 Published June 6th ,-and mailed to all adjoining property owners of
32 record within 200 feet of the subject property. No one present reported
33 failure to receive that notice or objected to its content and the
34 Manager reported receiving no objections to the request.
35
36 Gary Brown, 1317 Hillside Circle, Chaska, -MN, who had accompanied his
37 parents to the meeting, presented their request, saying they wanted to
38 replace the old entryway with another which would be two feet longer
39 and which would not be' so steep. The Manager confirmed that this would
40 require a two foot variance from the setbacks established when the home
41 was built long before Belden Drive was constructed. In his June - 15th
42 memorandum, ' Mr. Childs - had recommended the variance be approved .per-
43 ceiving that the existing corner lot which is only 42 . 2 feet wide could
44 not accommodate a standard size house, anyway, and said there are
45 several other substandard lots and homes- in the same block which were
46 also grandfathered. in with the City Zoning Ordinance.
47,
48 The applicants ' son assured Commissioner Jones that the existing driveway
49 .ended 'at the front door and that there would be no objections to having
50 it removed if 'there was a concern that it might be used to drive around .
51 the house.. The new garage fronts on Belden, he added. .. .
•53 Commissioner. Jones indicated he perceives the reconstructed- home- would
54 be a real asset to the neighborhood and he believes this to be just
55 another- instance of where the extra setback size. required for. corner
56 lots is not necessary.
y
-4- {(
f
1 lo .t
tion by � Commissioner .Franzese and seconded by Commissioner Jones o
2 recommend the - Council:-grant a two foot sideyard se.tback. variance= to the •
3.. City Zoning requirement for corner. lots to Edwin and Alyce Brown, which
4 would allow them to reconstruct their single family home at 2702-. 33rd ..
5 Avenue N.E. , to. within 12. 2 feet of their property line on Belden..Drive .
6 finding that:
7
8 -1. The existing lottand building prceded the- 1973 : Zoning Ordinance- .and
9 the construction of Belden Drive.
10
11 2. Many of the homes and lots in the same block are as small as the-
12 Brown's .
13
14 3. The applicants would suffer a hardship if they are forced to replace
15 the steep entryway on their existing home.
16
17 4. There was no demonstration of opposition to the request from.- the.
18 neighbors.
19
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21
22 Motion by Commissioner Franzese and seconded by Commissioner Bjorklund
23 to remove the consideration of the request for signage for the St.
24 Anthony Court Homeowners Association from the table.
25
. 26 Motion carried unanimously.
27
28 In his June 15th memorandum, the Manager had recommended that in- place
29 of the two signs the City had permitted .to identify the townhomes over
30 the winter months , a single two-sided sign would be allowed on. the -
31 existing berm north of the main entrance, which Mr. Childs perceived
32 would better meet the intent of the Sign Ordinance and adequately .
33 identify the property.. Because of the close P .U.D. tie-in with the
-34 signage on the barber shop next door; the Manager. had .referred to that
35 signage as another issue which could affect the decision on the town-
36 home si,gnage. He read aloud the letters he sent to Craig Morris I--lay 21st
-37 and June 7th, urging him to be in attendance at the hearing which would
38 be held at 8: 30 P.M. that evening. There had been no response to -
39 either request that Mr. Morris bring in plans for a permanent sign to
40 replace the temporary sign in front of his shop which had been _damage,d
41 by the tornado and the Manager suggested the discussion of the .St.
42 Anthony Court signage be deferred until after 8: 30 P.M.
43
44 Motion by Commissioner Jones and seconded .by Commissioner Bjorklund to
45 move the agenda, to item 7A.
46
47 Motion carried unanimously .
48
49 At 8-:22 P.M. , the hearing was opened to consider the request from .Reverend
50 Joseph- A. Valtinson, Jr. , Pastor of Elmwood Lutheran Church, for place-.
51 ment -of a 12' foot X ..65 -foot mobile• home on the north -end of the church
52 Property at 3615 -Chelmsford Road N.E. , which could. be utilized as
53 -temporary Sunday -School -classrooms during the time, not to exceed three •
54 Years, during which . time the. congregation would be conducting a drive
55 to raise $95',0:00 with which - to construct a sanctuary/classroom addition
56 on that- side of- the existing church structure. - .The notice_ of the hearing
s
c=
-5-
l which had been published -June '6th, and. mailed to all property-- owners of
2 record within 200 feet of� the subject property; was read by -.Chairman
3 Zawislak. No one present reported failure to receive the notice or
4 objected to its content . . Copies of the petition request for the
- 5 temporary .structure and the explanation of the ,church'-s proposal had
6 been included in the- Commission- packet along with a copy of the May 24th
7 letter- from Erling M-. Weiberg, spokesman for the group of neighbors who
-8 had participated -in the previous planning for an- addition on the south -
9 side of. the -church, indicating that the neighbors were in favor of the
10 church. being permitted 'to utilize the trailer for classrooms until the .
11 northern addition could be built.
12
13. In -his June-,15th memorandum, fir. Childs had recommended approval for a:
14 period of three years on the condition the trailer is skirted-and- tied
15 down. -He also indicated the .church representatives had agreed to place
.-16 the mobile home ten feet from .their building to meet the fire code.
17 fir., Childs indicated there had 'been- no calls about the request. ,
18
19 Commissioner Bjorklund indicated he perceived this request did not
20 differ much from schools who erect similar structures to accommodate
21 classes while they wait to see whether their student -popu1a_tion would
22 go down. Commissioner Jones: -indicated he was not 'in favor of granting
23 permission for the interim addition for as long as three years , per-
24 ceiving the -church should know '.whether, they would be able to build the
25 structure within two years , and, at that time, they could request an
26 extension of their. permit until the.-addition' is up. Commissioner. Wagner
27 was concerned that the structure would be sturdily constructed and
28 suggested it might not be needed until October .`
29
30 -Reverend Valtinson indicated the church would be renting space in the
31 Wilshire school building for 100 pupils this summer but said it, was
32 difficult to get the -little ones to- the school in the winter . He'
33 indicated there would be no plumbing in the structure and said' some
34 of the church Council members had not been too impressed with the trailer
35 the church. had first considered which had' been used by Control Data
36! for business purposes.
37 =
38 Donald Esau and Larry Antczak, 3505 and 3501 - 36th Avenue N.E: , the
39 neighbors--who .live- closest to the church, were present and Mr. Esau
40 indicated he was speaking on behalf of Mr. Weiberg who had been unable
41 to attend. He reiterated that all the neighbors on 36th Avenue and
42 Mr. Hastay on. Chelmsford had been contacted and' all supported the new
43 plans of the church and their request for a structure to use as temporary
44 classrooms until the new addition is completed. . He said,, since the
45 meetings on the south: -addition, communications had been kept open between
46 the church and the neighbors and, although, there was still some concern
47 about the slope of the land between the church and the neighbors" pro-
48 perties, - the church had been keeping that area mowed. this summer. He
49 attributed the change in feelings between the parties to the efforts of
50 the City Council, staff, and Planning Commission. fir. Esau also
5.1.confirmed -that none-of the neighbors were against, permitting the church
• 52 to use the mobile :home for three. years .
53 -
54.Commissioner Bjorkl'und, indicated 'he believed two winters should be
55 enough and that staff should be authorized 'to veto any'.:structure. which
-6-
1 does not meet the standards of that residential neibhborhood. 'Com- �.
2 missioner Bowerman said .he agreed that some restrictions--.had..to •be put
3 on the request, but did not believe the Church should. .be- forded. to
4. undertake a $9.5,00:0 .project sooner than is fiscally responsible. . Com
5 missioner. Franzese• said she recognized that the church should be. able i
6 to keep .the trailer long- enough -to make it worth -their cost and would. :
7 also be in favor: of not imposing stringent conditions on the approval.. ►
8 The Chairman indicated- he was. puzzled .that•, now that the neighbors were
9 in accord with the church's plans, the Planning. Commission was the-
10 party in opposition. He sided with the neighbors, -believing the .-City
11 should let them work things out with •the church.
12
13 : Commissioner Jones said he could .foresee many problems arising from the f
• 14- use of the trailer which the neighbors might not see at- this point. He
15 wanted the City Fire Marshall, to check out the facilities before so '..
16 many children are -permitted - to use them .and wanted assurance the' exterior •, I
17 of the structure would be well maintained while it was in use, which. i
18 Commissioner Bowerman questioned the City could force , citing several
19 instances of poor maintenance the City has not been able to control-. °
20
21 Reverend Valti-nson indicated the congregation's concern for the welfare
22 of the children would- prompt them to .have a fire inspection made. He .. .
23 said the church would. need to have the new . classrooms in place early I
24 in August so. preparations could be• made- before the fall sessions "began:- f
27 E
26 Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Jones' to
27 recommend the Council grant a variance to the Elmwood ,-Lutheran Church
28 which would allow them, to install a mobile home to be used for class-
29 rooms , to the north of their existing church at 3615 Chelmsford Road °
30 N.E. , August, 19.84, for a period .not to exceed two years , ,with provision
31 for the extension of that permit subject to the review and determination
32 of the City staff. In recommending- that the variance be granted, the
33 Planning. Commission finds that:
34
35 1. A proposed church addition to the existing church building, which
36 meets the approval of the neibhbors, . is in the planning stages , .and
37 that project is the reason the temporary structure is needed.
38
39 2 . The -temporary structure would be in an area. where it could not bb -
40 easily seen.
41
42 3. There was no opposition to the proposal but was instead supported
'43 in writing by the neighborhood spokesman- and in person by the- two
44 closest neighbors . -
45
46. 4•. , A .precedent for allow such structures had been established in the
47 City, prior to this request.
48
49 Motion carried unanimously.
50
51=.Commiss-ioner .Bjorklund- questioned :whether- the propane tank!. in front-. of
52 the American -Monarch building on- 37th, Avenue N-.E... could pose a hazard
53 for the residents -across the street in the event another. destructive
54 wind passes ;through the. City.. Mr. Childs indicated- he would check with
55 the - Fire Department about the possibility-, although he .is-•.cer-tai�n. they
56 know the tank is there.
1 At' 8z35 P.M. , the hearing on- the St. Anthony Court signage was resumed.:
2 with Mr. Morris 'having- failed to make an appearance. Chester Krumm,
3 President of the Homeowners Association, had resubmitted the application
4 for the two signs they were allowed over the winter with his • Niay 24th
5 letter to which he had attached a rendering . of. the Pine Cone Nursery
6 in Coon Rapids, illustrating the landscaping and plantings which would.,
7 be bermed up in such a manner that the. legs. of .the existing signs would
8 be concealed.
9
10 Nor. Krumm and another Homeowners Association member,. Edward T. Mattson, t
11 reiterated that they perceived the signs were important to distinguish ' `
12 their- driveway- from the Silver. Lake Road and- to prevent vehicles. coming. 4
13 from Apache from driving right into their property -or making U. turns
14 off Silver Lake Road on the driveway. Their property needs to be
. 15 identified as private property from both directions on Silver Lake Road,
16 Mr. Mattson said. Mr. Krumm also told the Commission the townhome
17 owners were also considering barricading the northern entrance to their
18 property because of the number of cars and semis who drive on their i
19 roadway and break down the curbs .
20
21 Commissioner Jones noted there is a street named Silver Lake Court not i
22 too far away and he wondered if maybe the use of "court" on the sign
23 C"St. Anthony Court") might have contributed to the' confusion. Com- �
24 missioner Franzese suggested the Manager might contact Ramsey County I
25 to see if signage could not be put up in front of the townhomes
26 prohibiting U turns.
28 Commissioner Bjorklund indicated he recognized the homeowners' need to
29 identify their property but told them .he considered the signs that were
30 up now to be cheap and not of the same quality or 'appearance as is
31 required by the City's Sign Ordinance. He cited several instances of .
32 commercial signs which more closely matched the type of construction
33 St. Anthony prides itself as demanding.
34
35 Commissioner Bjorklund indicated he had heard that the owner of the
36 barber shop at 3909 Silver Lake Road was going to sell his business and
37 he wanted the City to take immediate action regarding the signage for
38 that business which was damaged in the recent storm because he believes
39 Mr. Hedlund still owns that parcel. The Commissioner believes one good
40 quality sign for the townhomes should be the only identification sign
41 permitted for both properties in accordance with the P .U.D.
42
43 Commissioner Wagner questioned the value of signs which were probably
44 covered with snow most of the last winter. Mr. Mattson indicated he
45 believed- the. berming be about 22 to 25 inches above present ground level. .
46 -Mr. Krumm said the snow storage had been somewhat of .a problem with the
47 exceptional snows we had this winter, but the homeowners -had kept them
48 pretty well plowed out, he added.
49
50 •-Commissioner Franzese indicated she saw no need for two signs and agreed
51 .the- quality of_ the signage should be improved over what is there now.:
.52
53 Commissioner Wagner said he would rather see orie .well. designed. sign
54 replace the two signs that are in front of the townhomes now.
55
8.
1' Commissioner Bowerman had no objections to two signs as long as they are
2 easy to 'read ' from both directions. He hated to seethe City put undue
3 restrictions on the signage which the Association might not be able. to
4 afford.
5
6 - Commissioner Jones said he' would make a motion to expedite. matters but
7 still believed. two signs were needed to define the' townhome location.
8 However, ' he -would be willing to put off a , final decision .until staff
9 has had an opportunity to work with the Association representatives on
10 signage which would meet the criteria set in the Sign Ordinance. .
12 .The 'Chair indicated. he would also like to see staff meet with the
13 applicants. to get a better sign and he liked the idea of having the
14 County sign. the road ..in front of the townhomes to alleviate some of the
15 problems the owners have said they have.
16
17 Commissioner .Bjorklund indicated. he wanted to protect the interests. of
18 the neighbors in that area who had toiled away so many years to .get a
19 suitable project for that property.
20
21 Commissioner Hansen said. he would prefer one sign which could be well -
22 designed so it could be' seen from both directions on Silver Lake Road.
23 He suggested that if only one sign were .developed, the money invested
24 in two signs could be applied to even better landscaping than proposed.
25 He wondered if a "V" shaped sign might be more effective and opposed
26 voting on a motion without assurance that the quality of the signage., •
27 would be improved.
28
29 Motion by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Franzese to
30 recommend the Council grant the St. Anthony Court Homeowners Association.
31 a variance to the Sign Ordinance which would allow them two signs to III
32 identify their property , which would be 10 square feet each, and to i
33 recommend the City staff work with the Association representatives . on
34 the final plans for the signs which should be ground hugging; well
35 landscaped, as proposed; and of substantial materials to conform to
36 the quality of. the construction of the townhomes .
37
38 Voting on the motion:
39
40 Aye: Jones and Bowerman.
41
42 Nay: Bjorklund, Zawislak, Franzese, Wagner, and Hansen.
43 _
44 Motion not carried.
45
46 Motion by Commissioner Jones- and seconded by Commissioner Bjorklund to
47'-table -action on the variance request for 30 days to give staff sufficient
48 time to work with the townhouse representatives to develop adequate ,.
49 but quality signage to identify their property and (to recommend) the
50 homeowners be granted an additional 60 days to use the existing signs
51 while the new signage is-being developed.
52
53 Motion carried-unanimously.
54
55
•
-9-
1 The discussion of - the Morris sign,.' resumed: with Commissioner Bowerman
2. saying,:. it- was definite in. •his=_:mind,.,that the Craig.. Morris sign-was_ -
3 intended. to be only tempora-ry- dn. na-ture- and that it was permitted: .in
4 lieu -of- permanent signage for--the- rest of the P.U.D. project, -when, or
5 if, .such a project was developed for the rest- of the : Hedlund- property
6 along Silver Lake Road. The Commissioner stated further that the Morris
7 sign didn' t come anywhere -close to the criteria set for a commercial
8 business.
9
10 Motion by Commissioner Franzese and seconded by Commissioner Bjorklund
11. to recommend the Manager ,be authorized to follow .the course. of action -
12 stated in. his June 7th letter, -to- Mr.. Morris if the barber shop pro-,
13 prietor fails to take down the sign which is in violation of --the
14 ordinance (within 30 -days) staff be directed to remove it, after con-
15 sulting with the City Attorney.
16
17 Motion carried unanimously.
18
19 There were four proposals listed in the agenda for which the Commissioners
20 were asked to give concept reviewal and recommendations to the proponents.
21 Commissioner Bjorklund indicated �he believed four at one meeting were
22 too many, especially in view of, the number of hearings which had been
23 scheduled for the same evening. Mr. Childs said he would keep that
24 ,in mind in the future.
25
� 26 The first was a req.ues,t._from.-Mr. and Mrs . Eugene DeKanick;- 3109 wilson--
27 Street N.E. for some direction regarding their proposal to expand their
28 dining area on the south side of their home out two feet at -the same time
29 they construct a three season porch on the back of the house on. the .
30 same side, which would require no variance from the City . Mr. DeKanick
31 indicated they wanted a larger dining room to accommodate .large, family
32 dinners and he could not see why his neighbor to the south objected to
33 the expansion because the-dining room only faces the neighbors ' garage.
34 This neighbor was the only one who did not sign the letter of approval
35 he took around the neighborhood, Mr. DeKanick said, Mr. Childs had
36 verified in his June 15th memorandum on the request that the neighbor
37 in question had strongly objected. to their proposal to come, within` 3
38 feet of the property line.
39
40 The Commissioners were polled for their preliminary reaction. to the.
41 proposal.
42
_43Commissioners Hansen and Wagner had no objections to the proposal .
44
45 Commissioner Bjorklund said he _had walked between the properties at
46 3109 and 3107 and perceived it was : a tight-fit in that area and that
.47.the .expansion- might be . considered . a privacy encroachment and could make
48 access.-between the houses-.difficult. . He perceived there no -real hard=
49 ship but only .an-inconvenience for the -applicant if the -request i's. -denied.
50
'•5;1 Commissioner Franzese °believed the Commission should seriously consider
•52 the neighbors ' objections and perceived the applicant had not- satis
53factorily addressed the three -conditions under which such a variance can
54 be granted.
55
f
-10-
1
1 Chairman Zawislak had also seen for himself that the new addition would ;
2 face only the neighbors ' garage and suggested that the neighbor might .-:
3 be encouraged to change his/her mind.
4
5 Commissioner Jones believed the neighbors ' objections should be taken
6 seriously by the Commission.
7 '
8 Commissioner Bowerman said he had not experienced the same sense of `
9 tightness when he walked between the homes in uestion. He
q pointed out
10 that the porch which cuts down somewhat on the neighbors ' recreational
11 area in the backyard can be built without coming to the City at all and i
12 the dining room addition would only protrude into the area which faces
13 a garage wall. f
14
15 In his June 15th memorandum, the Manager had advised that the City
16 Ordinance does not address a business like Bumper Boats, which Dale
17 Broberg, 3336 Arthur Street N.E. , is proposing he would install some-
t
18 where in the Apache Plaza complex. He explained how the activity would i
19 be run in the letter included in the agenda packet along with pictures !
20 of a similar operation in another locale .
21
22 The Commission reaction was mostly negative.
23
24 Commissioner Bjorklund - doesn' t belong in a community like St. Anthony,
25 better suited to an amusement park. !
26
27 Commissioner Hansen - probably become a hangout, possibility of a gas !
28 hazard.
29
30 Commissioner Wagner - agreed not for St. Anthony, better in larger
31 amusement area.
32
33 Commissioner Franzese - would detract from image of a successful retail
34 center which Apache hopes to create with the
35 rebuilding.
36
37 Commissioner Zawislak - foresees objections from the elderly residents
38 in Heights Manor on Stinson Boulevard.
39
40 Commissioner Jones - probably not addressed in the City Ordinance because
41 not perceived to be an appropriate use for a
42 community like St. Anthony.
43
44 Commissioner Bowerman - wouldn't vote for, for the same reasons.
45
46 There was unanimous agreement that Gary Dooner, 2920 Silver Lake Court,
47 would not need a variance for all but one of the additions he proposes
48 to construct since the Commission interpretation is that the east side
49 setback should not be interpreted as a street side, which would require
50 30 feet. The neighbors have all indicated they would not oppose the
51 .12 foot front yard protrusion because it is at the end of the street •
52 and would provide a barrier for them from the Silver Lake Road noises
53 and because the average front yard setback in the area is much less than
54 30 feet.
55
c>
i.
• 1 Walter mSentyrz; 2609 California Street, N.E. , was also told ..there would
2 be no Commission., opposition-,to. his proposal, to, place,. a 62._ foot, wide .
3 home on the 75 foot wide - vacant. lot on Highcrest, just north of M.
4 33rd Avenue N.E. , as long as there is no neighbor opposition, .The
5 proposal would require a .2 ..foot sideyard variance.. to the...Ordinance
6 requirement for 15 foot sideyard setbacks," but the. Commission noted
7 there would be 19 feet between homes on one side and 14 feet on the
8 other and that the home could be expected to . be. of -high .quality. since
9 the design had won three Reggie Awards in the Parade of Homes... .
10
.11 Commissioner Bjorklund said he had noticed there was another "night
12 crawler for sale" -sign which had been up for a few months at 3106 .
13 33rd Avenue N.E. The Manager indicated the young person who had
14 erected the sign understood it could only be there on. a temporary
15 basis .. ;
16
17 Mr. Childs told Commissioner Franzese the bank had allowed Arkell to
18 go ahead with the construction of the Kenzington with 40 percent of
. 19 the units sold. He said the decision regarding the 202 project would
20 be made some time in September and he showed the Commissioners the
21 plans for a 32 unit development on the Walbon property at 33rd and
22 Highcrest, which the neighbors seemed to like.
23 r
24 Motion by Commissioner Bowerman and seconded by Commissioner Wagner
25 to adjourn the meeting at 10:29 P.M.
9 6 E
7 Motion carried unanimously.
28
29 i
30 Respectfully submitted, it
31
32 Helen Crowe, Secretary ! �
33 j
34
35 t
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43 I
44 j
45
46
47
48
49
50
�1
53
54
55
CITY OF S.T_..-�XNTUONY
REQUEST FOR CITY CO.UNCIyl. ACTIDN
• ----------------------------------------__----------------------------- ---
Date Submitted Type of Action-�Regjuewte ..1 Agenda. Item Number
Resolution Aeports-2b
June 22, 1984 Ordinance
Date Action Requested X Formal -Action/Motion Title Lot Split/Variance
Other Mike McGinn, 4017 Ford-
June 26, 1984 ham Drive
e
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David Childs, City Manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: This is a request to split Lot 9, Block 4,
r Moundsview Acres 017 Ford am Drive) into two single family lots. The applicant,
Mike McGinn, 4021 Fordham Drive, proposes that the existing house would be removed
r and two new single family homes would be built on ,tbe resulting 62.25 X 296 foot
lots. In addition to this request- for subdivislon.,!w.ithout platting, a variance is
s: required for the narrower lots since the City code_•hvequi�.res a 75' lot width. Since
they would be 18,400 square feet .each, no variance swneEded for lot area (9,000
r square feet are required) .
F
3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on'�the.xequest on June 19, 1984 and
• have recommended approval with reasons as presentd': i;n "t#�e i r minutes , including
numerous.. similar lot splits previously allowed;:by-,jt' e' C`ity in the Moundsview Acres
subdivision. No objections were received at the' lann;in.g Commission hearing.
ALTERNATIVES': Approve, modify or deny.
S
RECOMMENDATION: Because 1 would be purchasing a home to be built on the north lot
resulting from the split, l will not be making a recommendation on this request.
CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
1 �
YTon.
Was t • A
to°a ` I UaR PQ6PERt1C-s t11V1^E'w°�•' y a
WtTq. Nnaatrw LOTS ' u
10
IL
•-,r c• tt •.I• s.ls o••rs,
g
—Si '
E
340 Do RN .n ;>> 0 .t { - L�lfr •�.N 3 _ - 141P 4.
14SKE :s t g �o �� �' al �• II ,� '�s 1
N
120 t1 � • � -I ♦ �� � � Ir
• so' 2s6. tGc rv__ _ lases
w
n ? r, R �, • "'; , o�v 3 llJOl.71-11 0 `04 .42 ai. N yj
1 r •♦ . -Ills I&A-7 . _
IDS QT'
T
�. I _ ! g v les.l� roy-9 0��: 4 g6s� 3 � • r
z e ti IT rP
e a ok�tlow . 0 � 14
3•-� Q� L �,� . $ • ara.oe�eb� I Q► t3s.e� _ _ sos _ _ _
:.
} saw u�I +o . 1� ..`jl
0 s j OV • O -IZiSt gt •
� a � .1 V � a
Q s 15 t
C O
P N r
v
10 � Z1 = •.+s L��OS�MY� - 9 v lAA a I.'! _ l9 '^ ts�:.34 A*
= I♦ O • I $ ^b Vl• O •
•L4 `�
d+lva-M ►•�o•
• Ij
Q r
�- a o., c � .1 r,.• I�s.o ., a —1 � f r� 2 ti• Q- �
r' �� • .fi _rG _,/C of `'�..: r LL
fl Cl
wo.
Ioo a 1 Ib 5 = 194 2'!`213 of *I e+t I:� • "1 i 'f0� /S� �` s . a���8�
lb
t5l 04
Q
MIN;
MW
� QROr01C0 LoT 9rL+T.
FOR : M\Ke MC 6+NN
34101 Smwrm LAKE Ra.
M\NNCAPO+.\i Mw. 55421
i 0�
Leaw� Dest�+rT�oN
Lev \dlovw06 V%CUA AaRC• 3aaewo
AOO�TION, RAMiI.'I GOYNT`�i M�pK�sOtA.
I
z q s 87• P4AT
OL
4
iL4 M
' e PA it C C_9-
� c �...,.• sM�s,.., A Id
t9�.00'
--- - - +inn
tj :77
Ov Ho...• M ��.
i 1► N \1 1
i,
Z9S•6e PLAT
s sJ'
FAR E1, A
T%a q Now rw GL.rs f'«.V O R t oy' 9, B VeeK L4 Mouwv•
�ItW AtrrGS SCCBNO AOY�T.oN RAMS�Y Oo�w�v� M�NNS•�*'�..
ZvA.3+CC-t T. E.►a R N+arwtsm, 01 Ra�owv I� A►wv. _
OFAICCCt $ _'
Ler �l Q.RCSrZ' TKa Nowr94 G2.L5 f"6tT d�e.�a 4 M��+rP• s
V106W A4L R OIL f Stt.w.0 ^osslTt-mM, RAM�tY C.�raTr� M.NNSa.Tw.
.2%y+l�i�T TO 1•AO�Mf.MT� OI RsC�RO, T r ANY.
_ x
SCALD
•
0464m,Tas istow Mew.�wnaw� �OYhO
O OdLIiITf.s +RIq SILf 44 C/rfwrLP R`� 1GasZ
1 hereby certify that this survey,plan plat preliminary plat or report was preparcd•by me or under
my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Survevor under the laws of the State
of Min!e;sota. A.
,,.
�083Z �iiAt l/ �j/ K?OG
Reg. No. Date Job No. Book No.
- -
CITY OF.;ST.- ANTfif)NY
REQUEST FOR -cl I-T"Y',{UNCIL;'.1ACTION
Date Submitted Type of Action 'Re ueslted A etd-a 1Item Number
Rests ln't i on
June 22, 1984 Ordinance lte�carts�2c
Date Action ' Requested X Formal Action/Mot ion T ,,t1e..Settack Variance
Other - MiiCe!q.Pribayla, 3231
June 26, 1984 Roosevelt
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Thewexi.sti ng 1;ot at 3231 Roosevelt is 50' X 120'
in size and is buildable in accordance wt:t-h Section 12, Subd. 1 .2 (page 26) of the
Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Pribula proposes �to construct a 36 foot wide house on the
property for use as his residence. The ;,Zoning Ordinance requires a total sideyard
setback of 15 feet (5 and 10 feet) meani-ng-=a 1 foot variance is required to build
the house. He proposes a home nearly identical to the one recently constructed
across the street. He has addressed thericen ce.rns of the neighbor on the south by
placing the garage on the north and the largest ;setback on the south. No other
concerns or objections have been presented by,�---an,y of the neighboring property
• owners. The Planning Commission held a publiicMMearing on this request on June 19,
1984 and recommends approval with reasons asp.re.sented in their minutes.
ALTERNATIVES : Approve, modify, deny. i
RECOMMENDATION: In absence of neighbor objections, I recommend approval . ,
I
CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: . COMMENTS :
LWI/I .4
n.
/
--i,6-T9ii1-'tvEY-S- COMPANY
clay 0; — November
i
CITY OF 'ST- --AhT O:NY
REQUEST FOR CITY -COUNCIL 7ACT-7.O,N
-------------------------------------------- — ------------------------
Date Submitted Type of Action --Regu4s:ted = ':a-Agend-a Item Number
Resolution Reports-2d
June 22�, ' 1984 Ordinance
Date Action Requested x Formal Action--/ otion Title Setback. Variance
Other Ed Brown, 2702 --33rd
June 26,. .1984 :.Avenue N.E.
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David M. Childs , City Manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: I n recons t ruct i ng h i.s .home damaged i n the Ap r i 1
26th tornado, Mr. Brown is requesting permission to locate the entry on his home
an additional 2 feet closer to Belden Drive. The existing setback is 14.2 feet and
the new setback would be 12.2 feet. (Since it is a corner lot, a 30' sideyard is
required. ) The existing narrow lot is 42.2 feet wide and does not allow a standard
sized home. With a 5' west side setback and a 30' east side setback, a home could
only be 7.2 feet wide without a variance. No objections to the request have been
received. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 19, 1984 and has
recommended approval with reasons as presented in the minutes.
ALTERNATIVES : Approve, modify, or deny.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval .
• CITY .MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
IL
oxm
Lill -
ilT
cr&
.. r
Y'
l
C4 Pep
bnUs> 1ril
-
gn+t�rnM ln� n 'f14Art �l ,I /a ;�l�
---------------• 1 '� �•{►ot 1 �I of t� .- ---- - o'
IF-
-
-� "'stn
ti
t-
,f
1
CITY (YF';ST-: -.,A- 1T—H0NY
REQUEST FOR: C,1TY. COUNCIL ,ACT.-1ON
-------------------------------- --- ------ -- ---- ------.----.
Date Submi.tted Type Number
Resoaut3,on -.Reports-2e
June 22. 1984 OrdInance
Date Action Requested X Formal zActi•on .14otior `Title Elmwood Church
Other 44obi le Home for Temporary
June 26, 1984 aassr.•oom-Spa ce
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David M. Childs , City Manager
-------------,----------------
SUMMARY/DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Since our previous actions, the Church has
decided4their sanctuary on the north instead of as approved by the:-Louncil in a more
southerly location. Until they can raise the money to do so, they are requesting
placement of a 12' X 65' mobile home on the north end to be used for temporary
classrooms for a period not to exceed 3 years. The neighbors have submitted the
attached letter and appeared at the June 19, 1984 Planning Commission public hearing
to speak in favor of the request.
The Planning Commission has recommend approval for 2 years with adequate skirting and
• tie-downs as described in their minutes.
ALTERNATIVES : Approve, modify, or deny.
RECOMMENDATION: I concur with the Planning Commission recommendation.
•
CITX MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS:
ran
�Y
x .
The- Nei=ghbor Group .
• 3po keman_
ERLIhG:=:M. WEIBERG
- 3409-36 Ave: N.E..
Mpls., Minn. -55418
May 24, 1984
Pastor Joseph Valtinson
Elmwood Lutheran Chruch
St . Anthony
Minnesota, 5548
Dear Sir:
You visited with me, I think, on 1hursday, May 170 19840
about the current building plans of' your chruch. I thank you
for calling on me lo:-dicuss the building goals of your chruch.
I have discussed with the neighbors on the east end: of
36 Ave . NE and wits. Mr. Hastay on Chelmsford Road your in-
tentions to c-natruct a temporary building on the north side
of your present structure. 'he neighbors approve this action. .
Our .group,.- would. appreciate receiving from you an a _pearar.cc
sketch or draw_ng of the temporary structure, when it would be
available.
In our prevIz,is discussions in 1983 about the chruch
property improveme::t5, I report that the owners of lots
2-3-4 and 5 are awaiting a proposal from the chruch as to
the landscaping of the 'slope' and correction of the drainage
problem. The chruch and the neighbors, as I remember, do .
wish to move away from the, task of cutti- g grass on the slope.
To cut the- grass on the slope is a tough job and hazardous
for each of us .
-We request, aat your earliest convenience, a dialogue
on this latter subject.
IVV
. . Sir cerely,
Erling/ M Weiberg�
Ho r,n e
MINIOLOIDJ N
I•. 1
MID
rs
ffxr
GH U on
000 A
N �
•��',: a '�` 111 , �t�! t D
--
•
Agenda Item: Reports-4a Status: Informational
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 19 , 1984
TO: Department Heads
David Childs , City Manager
FROM: Connie Kroeplin, Administrative Secretary
SUBJECT: Staff Meeting Notes - June 19, 1984
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The meeting began at 10 : 15 A.M. Those present were Dave Childs ,
Ray Nelson, Don Hickerson, Larry Hamer, Carol Johnson, Lee Entner,
and Connie Kroeplin.
Larry Hamer indicated due to the April 26th tornado, several of the
Public Works ' projects are behind schedule, but he expects to be
• caught up in the near future . Seal coating will be done in August,
west of Silver Lake Road from 27th Avenue to 33rd Avenue. They will
seal coat as much as funds allow.
Mr. Hamer also expects to secure all the easements for the Roseville
waterline connection by the end of this week (6/22) . The City of
St. Paul has agreed to lend the Village an 8" meter needed for the
connection, which will save the Village about $8,000 . The project
is expected to commence about Thursday, June 21st, following a public
hearing for approval as required by the EPA on Wednesday, June 20th.
The new police squad has been promised to be ready by June 28th by
the Ford Company. Mr. Hamer had discussed the delays in the purchase
at a Hennepin County purchasing meeting. He said he received very
little cooperation from that group. The new plow truck purchased
by the Public Works Department will also be ready soon.
About a thousand dead fish had been found floating in Silver Lake.
Mr. Hamer- contacted the DNR about the cause and that agency found it
was caused by a bacteria only harmful to small blue gills and crappies .
There is no health threat to humans.
Carol Johnson had recently attended a purchasing conference in Duluth
which she felt was a very good one. She will attend a Finance
Officers meeting on microcomputers and local government June 20th.
Mrs. Johnson has and will attend election meetings. She indicated
there is a new state law requiring the City Hall be kept open the
_ T2-
Saturday ;and Monday .before the elections for absentee ballot voting,.
She also -said ' the •Ci'ty''s 1983-'audit went smoothly and is "nearing
completion.
The Grand Opening for the -liquor warehouse was- held last .week.
Mr. Nelson indicated the weather was a detriment,. but the liquor
operations - as a whole are up for the last month. He has been. in
contact with the insurance company regarding reopening the .Apache
site, but found Dennis Cavanaugh,. of C. G. • Rein, 'is .in Europe and
progress will be minimal until his return. Mr. Nelson noted business
at the Stonehouse bar is doing very -well,'- but the Stonehouse off-safe .'
business is down. He is, therefore,' examining the entire situation
-to determine the feasibility of. keeping the Stonehouse off-sale open.. .
- Lee Entner has checked into emergency lighting at_ City Hall and other .
City buildings and has 'obtained.,cost figures ($50-$75) .
Documentation of time when using the workout room and/or physical
exercise by the police and fire departments was stressed by ' Mr. Childs .
He also reminded those department heads that the fitness program is
mandatory and that documentation. of exercise and other 'activities-' is .
required.
Mr. Childs indicated the Police Department's 1984 salaries%union 'contract
had been approved at the last Council meeting. He is working on a •
"package" to submit to the Council 'regarding non-union personnel. '
The plans for Midwest Federal are at City Hall.
The meeting adjourned at 11': 00 A.M,.
cjk _ ..
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
• ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution Aeports-Ab & c
June 22, 1984 Ordinance
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Gross Golf Course
Other
June 26, 1984 Water/Sewer Hookups
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: St. Anthony has had long-standing understandings
with our neighboring communities that one City will not allow hookup of water/sewer
by a property owner in another community without approval of that City. An
example is St. Anthony supplying sanitary services to MSM Co. in Roseville.
Here we have a request from the Minneapolis Park Board to connect their sewer lines
with Minneapolis and buy water from Roseville.
•
FISCAL IMPACT: St. Anthony would not receive revenues from water sales or sewer
discharges , nor would they be responsible for provision of those services. Since
they are a heavy summer water user, they could possibly put a strain on our water
supply at peak demand periods.
ALTERNATIVES : Approve, modify, deny. Roseville probably would not allow them to
connect wit out your approval .
RECOMMENDATION• Per Council . have attached a cost estimate for St. Anthony
ou evar econstruction, which, although not directly related, has been an
issue of concern to the City.)
CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
L_—
10
Agenda Item: Status;.
Reports— 4b Per Council
MINNEAPOLIS
PARK&RECREATION BOARD
June 6, 1984
Dave Childs
City Council
City of Saint Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
Saint Anthony, Minnesota 55418
Dear Council Members:
The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board respectively requests your
• permission to connect our new Gross Golf Clubhouse Building to the
City of Minneapolis sewer system. The basic reason for this request
is that after studying several routes to obtain a sewer service for our
building, the most economical is one which goes to Minneapolis.
If I can be of any further service in this matter please call me at 348-
2220.
Yo s jtruiy,
�,ti r
Dennis J. Ryan X
Director of Engine ing
President:
Patricia Hillmeyer DJR/bjs
Vice President:
Walter Bratt
Commissioners:
Nancy L Anderson
Patricia D. Baker
Tom Baker
Dale W."Skip"Gilbert
William Holbrook
Naomi Loper
Scott Neiman
Secretary:
A een
ntendent:
David L Fisher
310 South Fourth Avenue
Minneapolis,MN 55415
Phone 1-612-348.2142
Adjenda Item: Status: ..
• Reports- 4c Per Council
MINNEAPOLIS
PARK&RECREATION BOARD
May 25, 1984
Dave Childs
City Council
City of Saint Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
Saint Anthony, Minnesota 55418
Dear Council Members:
The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board respectively requests your
• permission to connect our new Gross Golf Clubhouse Building to the
City of Roseville's water system. The basic reason for this request is
that after studying several routes to obtain a portable water supply
for our building, the most economical is one which goes to Roseville.
If I can be of any further service in this matter please call me at 348-
2220.
Yoprs truly,
1
Dennis J. R �
Director ofdg� �
ine
President:
Patricia HWmever DJR/bjs
Vice President:
Walter Bratt
Commissioners:
Nancy L Anderson
Patricia D. Baker
Tom Baker
Dale W."Skip"Gilbert
William Holbrook
Naomi Loper
Scott Neiman
Secretary:
Den
Su tendent:
David L Fisher
310 South Fourth Avenue
Minneapolis,MN 55415
Phone 1-612-348.2142
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
• ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • CHIPPEWA FALLS.,WISCONSIN
G�
October 19, 1983 RE: PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
��r.TTUnrry an[ii F�7ART1 -
ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA
SEH FILE NO. 83067
Larry Hamer
Public Works Director
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Dear Larry:
In accordance with our recent telephone conversation, we are
hereby providing a preliminary cost estimate for the
complete reconstruction of St. Anthony Boulevard from south
of the BNRR bridge to the south corporate limits of St.
Anthony. The length of this segment is approximately 3100
feet and the proposed road width is 36 feet. We have
prepared the estimate using approximated per foot costs as
follows:
Grading & Removals $18/LF = $ 55,800
Storm Sewer $12/LF = 37, 200
Base Construction $22/LF = 68, 200
Curb & Gutter $11/LF = 34, 100
Roadway Surfacing $20/LF = 62 , 000
Sidewalk $18/LF = 55, 800
Restoration $ 6/LF = 18,600
SUBTOTAL $331, 700
PLUS 10% CONTINGENCIES $365,000
PLUS 15% OVERHEAD & ENGINEERING $420,000
We would caution that this estimate has been prepared for
preliminary discussion purposes only. A more detailed
estimate should be prepared for any serious consideration or
negotiation.
If you have any questions concerning the project please feel
free to call.
Sincerely,
Steve Campbell
jcj
200 GOPHER BUILDING • 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 • PHONE (612) 484-0272
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AIDS AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
P. 0. BOX 6444.6
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55164
PHONE: (612) 296-2286
SUPPLEMENTAL 1984 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID NOTICE MAY 23, 1984
CITY MANAGER
CITY HALL
ST ANTHONY CITY OF
3301 SILVER LAKE ROAD NE
ST ANTHONY MN 55418
A LAW PASSED IN THE 1984 LEGISLATIVE SESSION HAS RESTORED THE 1984 LOCAL
GOVERNMENT AID THAT YOUR CITY.AND. O.THERS LOST AS A RESULT -OF THE REDUCTION FOR
THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PREVIOUS LAW. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AID IS EQUAL TO
THE AMOUNT OF THE PREVIOUS REDUCTION FOR YOUR CITY AND WILL BE PAID AS PART OF
YOUR TOTAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID IN SIX MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS FROM JULY TO
DECEMBER OF 2984. THE FIRST MONTHLY INSTALLMENT WILL BE PAID JULY 15, 1984.
THE NEW SUPPLEMENTAL 1984 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID FOR YOUR CITY 15 S 12,952 .
THE TOTAL REVISED 1984 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID FOR YOUR CITY, INCLUDING THE
SUPPLEMENTAL AID, IS S 205.107 .
THE SAME LAW THAT ENACTED THE SUPPLEMENTAL 1984 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID ALSO
PROVIDES AN ADJUSTMENT TO YOUR 1985 LEVY LIMITATION.
THE AMOUNT OF SUPPLEMENTAL AID PAYABLE IN 1984 THAT EXCEEDS THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN YOUR ACTUAL LEVY SUBJECT TO THE LEVY LIMITATION AND YOUR LEVY LIMITATION
FOR 1984 WILL BE USED TO REDUCE YOUR CITY'S LEVY LIMITATION FOR 1985.
FOR EXAMPLE: IF YOUR SUPPLEMENTAL AID IS $50.000 AND YOU LEVIED UP TO YOUR
LIMITATION FOR 1984, ALL OF THE $50.000 WILL BE DEDUCTED. IF YOUR CITY LEVIED
S20 .000 LESS THAN ALLOWED FOR 1984. $30.000 WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM YOUR LIMITATION
FOR 1985.
THE AMOUNT TO BE DEDUCTED FROM YOUR LEVY LIMITATION, FOR 1985 IS S 30051 .
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS LETTER, PLEASE CALL ME AT (612)
296-2286.
VERY TRULY YOURS,
RICHARD B. GARDNER, SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AIDS AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
C I T Y C F S T A N T H O N Y L I Q U O R
P/E 5/31/84 A C C C U N- T S P A Y A B L E PAGE 1
VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK
. NC. TYPE LATE NO. AMOUNT
044CC- ST ANTHCNY LIQUOR #1 M 5/C3/84 06297 175 .00
0441C ST ANTHCNY NATL BANK M 5/03/84 06298 - 159000.00
040C4 AT 6 T M 5/03/84 06299 35.23
04009 AETNA LIFE 6 CASUALTY M 5/C3/84 06300 288.00
C4014 AMERICAN BANKERS INS M 5/C3/84 06301 26.40
04025 APACHE PLAZA M 5/03/84 06302 1,577 .23
0408C CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION M 5/03/84 06303 65.00
C 4 1 C C COMMISSICNER OF REVENUE M 5/03/84 06304 818.19
04106 C 6 D TRICKING M 5/C3/84 06305 1,442 .50
C412C EAGLE WINE CC M 5/03/84 06306 19426.74
C4175 GRIGGS COOPER 6 CO INC M 5/03/84 06307 110578.72
0421C INTERCONTINENTAL PKG CO M 5/C3/8'4 06308 1,443 .62
C422C JChNSCN ti[ NE CC M 5/03/84 06309 49890.54
04245 LOCAL X17 M 5/03/84 06310 14.50
04269 MEC CENTER M 5/03/84 06311 168.35
04295 MINN BENEFIT ASSN N 5/C3/84 06312 5.00
04311 MINTER-b►EISMAN M 5/C3/84 06313 19462 .11
0434C NW BELL TELEPHCNE CC M 5/C3/84 06314 392.97
C436'_' EPSCO M 5/03/84 06315 2,091 .00
04365 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN M 5/C3/84 06316 19342.36
C437C PICNEER CETECTIVE AGENCY M 5/03/84 06317 173. 10
0437E. PRIOR NINE CO M 5/03/84 06318 256.45
• 0438C PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMNT M 5/C3/84 06319 1 ,545.66
04365 QUALITY DINE CO M 5/03/84 06320 4, 5C5.12
04401 ST ANTHCNY LIQ Al P. 5/C3/84 06321 54 .49
04410 S•T ANTHCNY NATL BANK M 5/C3/84 06322 1 ,352.36
04411 SAL.ITERPrAN REALTY CC P! 5/03/84 06323 19666 .67
04445 ST TREAS SOC SEC C ONTR FD M 5/C3/84 06324 1,254.00
04475 ThIN CITY FEDERAL M 5/03/84 06325 20.00
^449C ThIN CITY WINE CC M 5103/84 06326 2,801 .43
04491 UNITED bAY M 5/C3/84 06327 18.00
04495 I%ESTERN LIFE INS CC M 5/C3/84 06328 26.40
0420 INETZER E �ELYN N 5/03/84 06329 7CO .00
04235 LECLAIRE DIANE M 5/C3/84 06330 125.00
04325 RAYMOND NELSCN M 5/03/84 06331 160 .00
04120 EAGLE WINE CO M 5/11/84 06334 244.11
04175 GRIGGS CCCPER 6 CO INC M 5/ 11/84 Of-335 15992S.24
04290 MINNEGASC M 5/11/84 06336 1,157.99
04311 MINTER-hEISMAN M 5/ 11/84 06337 950. 17
C436C EPSCC M 5/ 11/84 06338 316.68
0437E PRIOR WINE CO M 5/ 11/84 06339 230.89
04375 -POSTMASTER M 5/11/84 06340 80.00
04004 AT 6 T M 5/17/84 06341 57.56
04100 COMMISSICNER OF REVENUE M 5/17/84 06342 735.83
06179 FUKAS TCBACCC CCRP M 5/ 17/84 06343 13.50
04175 GRIGGS CCOPER 6 CO INC M 5/17/84 06344 39340.76
04210 INTERCONTINENTAL PKG CO M 5/ 17/84 06345 356.14
0422C JOHNSCN DINE CO M 5/ 17/84 06346 876 .26
04311 MI N TER-bE I SMAN M 5/17/84 06347 923 .16
0436C EPSCO M 5/17/84 06348 59966.28
• C I 1 Y O F S T A N T H C N Y L I Q U C R
P/E 5/31/84 A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E PAGE 2
VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK
NO. TYPE DATE NC. AM.CUNT
.34376 PRIOR WINE CO M 5/ 17/84 06349 585.79
C438C PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMNT M 5/ 17/84 06350 Lv468.21
04385 - CUALITY MINE CC M 5/17/84 06351 441.00
06180 RAYS RAOIC C TV M 5/17/84 06352 105.45
0441C ST ANTHONY NATL BANK M 5/17/84 06353 19225.31
04410 ST ANTHCNY NATL BANK M 5/ 17/84 06354 150C`OC.00
04445 ST TREAS SOC SEC CONTR FD M 5/ 17/84 06355 lvl42 .32
04490 TWIN CITY WINE CO M 5/ 17/84 06356 5C7.03
C4144 FRITC-LAY INC M. 5/ 17/84 06357 4.00
06181 MINN POLICE CHIEFS ASSN M 5/24/84 06358 100 .00
C441C ST ANTHONY NATL BANK M 5/24/84 06359 15vOCC.00
C41CC COMMISSICNER OF- REVENUE M 5/24/84 06360 229005.42
04100 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE M 5/31/84 06361 668.81
04120 EAGLE MINE CC M 5/31/84 06362 3,760.62
06182 FULLER VIDEO PRODUCTIONS M 5/31/84 06363 lv249 .00
04175 GR IGGS CCOPER E CO INC M 5/31/84 06364 8v9C5.96-
C42 LC IKIERCCNTINENTAL PKG CC M 5/31/84 06365 743.44°
04220 JOHNSON MINE CC M 5/31/84 06366 1 ,224 .63
04311 MINTER-MEISMAN M 5/31/84 06367 19747.30
C'434C NN BELL TELEPHCKE CC M 5/31/84 06368 166.53
04360 EPSCO M 5/31/84 06369 19770.13
C4376 FRITR NINE CC M 5/31/84 06370 56.63
• C438r PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMNT M 5/31/84 46371 19461 .57
04385 CUALITY WINE CO M 5/31/84 06372- 29864.52
06183 REC MILL MFG CG M 5/31/84 06373 419.46
G44CC- ST ANTHCNY LIQUOR # 1 N 5/31/84 06374 175 .00
C441C ST ANTHCNY NATL BALK M 5/31/84 - 06375 159000.00
C441C ST ANTHCNY NATL BANK M .5/31/84 06376 19232 .53
04445 ST TREAS SOC SEC CCNTR FD M 5/31 /84 06377 1 , 132.71
TYPE TOTAL 190v446.C8
C44C0 ST ANTHCNY LIQUOR #1 R 5/31/84 00001 175.00
0441C ST ANTHCNY NATL BANK R 5/31/84 00002 159000.00
TYPE TCTAL 159175.00
TCTAL 205,6;1.08
•
C I T Y C F S T A N T H C N Y L I O U C R
p/E E/ 14/ P.4 A L C O U IN T S P A Y A B L E PAGE 1
VFNDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK
k)0 TYPE CAT E NO. AMOUNT
04015 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CC R 6/ 14/84 0559 113.21
04033 AUGIES INC R 6/ 14/84 0356^ 232.94
0- 4 055 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING R 6/ 14/84 03561 197 .05
41 Or CCM.MISS ICNER OF REVENUE R (5/ 14/84 03562 17.15
^4117 DOLBLE CCLA R 6/ 14/84 03563 168.95
.')4125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO R 6/ 14/84 03564 16,008.90
0414!' F 6 E SALES 6 SERVICE R 6/ 14/84 03565 10.00
04144 FRITO-LAY INC R 6/14/84 03566 291 .24
0-4145 GANZER CISTRIBUTORS INC R 6/ 14/84 0567 169880.56
7415C GATEWAY hAROWARE CC R 6/ 14/84 03568 47.06
04159 GOLD EAGLE DIST CO R 6/ 14/84 03569 79 .00
04174 GRIGGS SEER CISTRIBUTCRS R 6/ 14/84 03570 S93P7.45
".4195 HAPPYS PCTATO CHIP CC R 6/14/84 03571 71.70
04203 HETZER EVELYN R 6/14/84 03572 200.00
0-4205 HCME JUICE CC R 6/ 14/84 03573 79.44
^4215 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE R 6/14/84 03574 54.00
04218 JChNSON PAPER E SUPPLY CO R 6/14/84 03575 546.32
14230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CC R 6/ 14/84 03576 229357.25
4241 L I LL I E SLBURBAN NE I+SPAPER R 6/ 14/84 03577 84 .00
,4251' LYSTAGS R 6/ 14/84 03578 71.14
:4263 MAPLE GRCVE HTG CO R 6/ 14/84 03579 85.47
• ^4265 MARK VI-I SALES INC R 6/ 14/84 03580 21 ,881 .53
"4293 MINN BAR SUPPLY it 6/ 14/84 03581 1, 3 12.95
` 432,' NELSON OFFICE SUPPLY R 6/ 14/84 ^3582 8 .33
X4345 CLC OUTCF Fr :-jCS INC P, 6/ 14/84 03583 91 .08
4355 PEPSI CCLA/7 UP eOTTLING R 6/ 14/84 03584 1, 717.40
`439^ R E X DISTR. IeUTING CG R 6/ 14/84 03585 149483 .50
1'4395 ROYAL BEVERAGE LIST CC R 6/ 14/84 03586 599.20
'4356 ROYAL CRCWN BEV R 6/14/84 03587 182.15
3443^ SILENT KNIGHT R 6/ 14/84 03588 39.00
°4434 SCLTHSIGE DISTRIBUTING Cti R 6/ 14/84 03589 323.20
1445-
STUART DISTRIBUTING CC R 6/ 14/84 03590 364.95
^4453 SUEURE?AN PAPER 6 PKG CO R 6/ 14/84 03591 239.25
"446;' SUNDERLAND INC R 6/14/84 03592 894.75
~-4465 SURGE WATER CONDITICNING R 6/ 14/84 03593 58.80
X447" TCNBSTCNE PIZZA R 6/ 14/84 03594 71.35
0,448''' Ti, IN CITY FILTER SERVICE R 6/ 14/84 03595 35.00
04493 WGR MARKETING R 6/ 14/84 03596 27.60
^4494 i&ARNER HARDWARE R 6/ 14/84 03597 58.73
^6165 HUFFS REPAIR CO R 6/ 14/84 03598 38 .34
06185 CENTRAL LOCK 6 SAFE CO R 6/ 14/84 03599 45.00
^6166 LAKE bAY SIGNS C DISPLAYS F 6/14/84 0360^ 365.00
'6187 M9 SUPPLY CO R 6/14/84 03601 11 .63
06188 NEI% BRIGHTCN HOWE R 6/ 14/84 03602 90.25
' 6189 ST ANTHChY PAINTS R 6/14/84 03603 72.33
06190 SP LAKE PK LUMBER R 6/ 14/84 03604 154.72
• TYPE TOTAL 1109158.87
TOTAL 11C, 1S8.87
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES
June 26 , 1984
A. Call to Order.
B. Roll Call.
C. Approval of May 22 , 1984 H.R.A. Minutes .
. D. Claims .
1. Dorsey & Whitney - $1, 745 .96 .
2. GME Consultants , Inc. - $1, 095 . 50 (H.R.A. pays half of
total bill)
E. New Business .
1. Metro Council Review of 202 Proposals - Informational .
2. Walbon Property.
a. Springsted Cash Flows .
b. Authorize Appraisal and Relocation Appraisal.
c. Authorize Negotiations for Agreement for Redevelopment
Consultant Service with Dick Krier.
d. Other.
F. Adjournment.
•
4
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES
• ..May 22, 1984 •
. The meeting was called to order-by Chairman Sundland at. 9 :46• P.M.
:Present for roll call: Sundland; Vice Chair Enrooth; Secretary/.
Treasurer Marks; and Commissioners Ranallo and
Makowske.
Also present: David Childs, Executive Director; William Soth,
Attorney; Muffy Gabler of Walker Senior Housing Corpora-
tion; and Steve Yurick of Arkell .Development Corporation.
Motion by Secretary/Treasurer Marks and seconded by Commissioner
Ranallo to approve as submitted the minutes of the H.R.A. meeting held
May 8, 19 84.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Commissioner Ranallo and seconded by Secretary/Treasurer
Marks to authorize the reimbursement of $4 ,000 to Arkell Development
Corporation to cover the costs of demolition of the G & G Autobody
building for Phase 1 of the Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project minus
the rock for the driveway as per their agreement with the H.R.A.
• Motion carried unanimously.
The Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Redevelopers Contract were pre-
sented by staff for H. R.A. consideration. Mr. Childs read the changes
in Page 11 of the Third Amendment and Mr. Soth read the amendment
modifications to the Fourth Amendment which would extend the con-
struction deadline on Phase 1 from June 11 to July 1 , 1984 as requested
by the developer. Mr. Yurick reported the 47th unit in the Kenzington
had been sold that evening and indicated the ground breaking ceremonies
for the project would be held at 11:00 A.M. , Saturday, June 23rd.
Commissioner Ranallo complimented the developer on the fine dinner
reception, which had been given for all those who are purchasing a
condominium and said the ground breaking ceremonies would add to the
credibility of the project.
Motion by Secretary/Treasurer Marks and seconded by Vice Chair Enrooth
to approve the Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopers Contract as pre-
sented by staff.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Commissioner Ranallo and seconded by Secretary/Treasurer
Marks to approve the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopers Contract
which would extend the construction deadline on Phase 1 from June 11th
to July 1, 1984 as per staff recommendation.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Secretary/Treasurer Marks and seconded by Vice Chair Enrooth
to adjourn the Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting at 9:55 P.M.
Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Hp!1 en Crnwe _ gar-ratary
Mr. David M. Childs
Executive Director - MAY 91 19..84..._ .
Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418
IN ACCOUNT WITH
DORSEY 8c WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 44402
(INTERNAL REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. 41-0223337)
IN RE:
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(A separate Disbursement Statement is or will be rendered for our disbursements,if any, for your account.)
To legal services rendered from April 1, 1984- Amount
through April 30, 1984
Attend HRA Meeting April 24 $35. 00
Regarding Kenzie Terrace 202 Project, including
telephone conferences with Steve Yurick, David
Grant, Dick Krier and David Childs; Meetings with
attorneys for Redeveloper and Walker Methodist
Homes and representatives of Redeveloper, Walker
Methodist Homes and Rothschilds; reviewing and
revising Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement; and
matters regarding purchase of restaurant property
from Saliterman. $1, 680. 00
Total Fees $1, 715.00
Plus Disbursements per attached statement $ 30.96
Total Fees & Disbursements $1,745.96
WRS:ln
•
Payment due within 10 days of receipt of statement.
Disbursements made for your account,for which bills have not yet been received will appear on a later statement.
V
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
2083 East Center Circle / Minneapolis. MN 55441 /612/559-1859
May 25, 1984
Ms. Muffy Gabler Mr. David Childs 4f
Walker Methodist Residence Executive Director
and Health Services, Inc. Housing & Development
3737 Bryant Avenue South City of St. Anthony
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409 3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony-, -Minnesota 55415
GME Job #355-A
RE: Invoice for soil report for Elderly Housing for Kenzie
Terrace Redevelopment in St.- Anthony, Minnesota
ENGINEERING
Services of Principal Engineer
I hour @ $70. 00/hour $ 70.00
•
Services of, Senior Project Engineer-
5 hours @ $55. 00/hour $ 275.00
Services of Field Engineer
2 hours @$35.00/ $ 70.00
Services of Secretary or Draftsman
6 hours @ $23. 00/hour $138. 00
SUBTOTAL $ 623. 00
FIELD EXPLORATION
Mobilization/demobilization of crew
and equipment
3 hours @ $80.00/hour $ 240. 00
Boring layout and elevations
2 hours @ $70. 00/hour $ 140.00
Drilling and Sampling
12 hours @ $90. 00/hour $1080.00
SUBTOTAL $1460.00
LABORATORY TESTING
Moisture Content Tests
14 tests @ $8.00/te3t ,0112.00
TOTAL $2195.00
GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS OK DMA
WILLIAM C.KWASNY.P.E. THOMAS P.VENEMA.P.E. WILLIAM E.BLOEMENDAL.E.I.T.
7
Ms. Muffy Gabler & Mr. David Childs
May 25, 1984
Page 2
Invoice (continued)
TERMS: Net due upon receipt
Accounts over 30 days are subject to a finance charge
of 1 1/2% per month
Please indicate GME Job Number and date of invoice on
your remittance
Thank you
NOTE: It is our understanding that each of the addressees will f
pay one-half of this invoice. The amount is $1097.50.
cc: Mr. Gary Tushie
Saunders-Thalden and Associates, Inc.
I
A 04 �� Metropolitan Council
4 300 Metro Square Building
S Seventh and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota.55101
• = Telephone(6121291-6359
June 19, 1984
Mr. Thomas Harren
Minnesota Intergovernmental Review Process
State Planning Agency
Capitol Square Building
St. Paul , Minnesota 55101
RE: HUD Section 202 Program Applications
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 12135-11 thru 12139-1
State Identifier No. 84050801-11 thru 84050805-11
Dear Mr. Harren:
At its meeting on June 14, 1984, the Metropolitan Council considered HUD
Section 202 Program applications. This consideration was based on a report of
the lc, Referral Report No. 84-65. A copy of this report is attached.
• The Council finds the following proposals are, unless otherwise noted,
consistent with the Development Framework and other applicable policies of the
Metropolitan Development Guide and are ranked in priority order based on the
Council 's Housing Review Guidelines:
Referral
Rank Number Project Name Location HUD Project
1 12135-1 Northwest Metro Housing Rogers 092-EH2O8-WAH-L8
2 12137-1 Walker on Kenzie St. Anthony 092-EH2O5-WA8-L8
3 12136-1 Woodhaven Edina 092-EH2O9-WAH-L8
4 12138-1 Red Rock Manor Newport 092-EH207-WAH-L8
5 12139-1 Little Crow Elderly Housing St. Paul 092-EH2O3-WA8-L8
The Council finds the Little Crow Elderly Housing Project, Referral Number
12139-1, conflicts with the Housing chapter of the Metropolitan Development
Guide because of its remoteness from retail services and its proximity to other
assisted housing developments. Notwithstanding these concerns, this project is
ranked number 5 in the event that sufficient funds become available to the
region to fund this and the other ranked projects as well as any projects for
handicapped residents that meet Metropolitan Council policies.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
t►
v
•
The Council has received letters from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
commeting on some of these applications. Copies of these letters are attached.
Sincerely,
Sandra S. Gardebring
Chair
SSG:sb
Attachment
cc: -App icants
acted Municipalities
C.R. Payne, Acting Director of Engineering, MWCC
Wayne Nelson, Metropolitan Council Staff
fT /
•
May 17, 1984
IMr. John Rutf ord
Referral Coordinator
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
RE: Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 12137-1
Dear Mr. Rutford:
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has reviewed
the application for federal housing assistance for
Walker on l- Kenz ie to .be., located in the City-of St.. ::,.
Anthony.
Our review indicates the project is consistent with the
approved Comprehensive Sewer Plan for the City. The
Commission, therefore, has no objection abjection to
this development. The City should, however, revise the
number of new sewer connections estimated to occur in a
five-year period and submit this information to the
Camnission.
Sincerely,
C. R. Payne
Acting Director of Engineering
CRP:EJB:CLL
I
i I
I i
4,
r
For Release: 6/14/P4; a:CO p.m. Bus. Item: 8-4
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
i Suite 300 Metro Square Ruilding, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
291-6359
REPORT OF THE ''c iI ROPOL ITAN AMD C0.'MU'IITY DEVE-LOPt, ;IT CO MMITTEE
Referral Report o. -
TO: Metropolitan Council
SUPJECT: N'JJ Section 202 Program Applications
Referral Reports *12135-1, 12135-1, 12137-1, 12138-1, and 12139-1
DATE: June 6, 1984
3ackaround
The Metropolitan and Cc.�.::,uni ty Development Cc..^i ttee considered ties:
applications during its meeting on O'ay 31, 1q84. The applications are for HUD
Section 202 Program financing of Bevel opmert; for 1 cover income elderly people.
HUD subni tted the applications for review in accord with the prcceeures of the
• vIinnesota Irteryovernrental Review Process.
Tssues and Ccrcerns
Lee ,inn Tal l5ear spoke and gave a slide presentation on behalf of the St. P:.ul
Intar-Tribal Housing Hoard, sponsor of the Little Crow Elderly Hous?ng
proposal . She addres=ad the st3=f"s policy conflict fi rdi ngs re:ar-d i ng her
proposal , Indian preferences for access to services, historical pees-sctiv=s
leading to the es'abiishm- ent and ini.ia.ives of her board, her ' oard s
managame.1t 'l es the need for project approval in prier to d_�ons:rate
cem"etence t0 dzvalop and ma^age housing for the elderly, and admissions
considerations.
The following issues and concerns were raised by the commit-tee:
1) Does an inner-city location relatively close to the broad ranee cf services
available in the downtown area corpensata for a lack of cer-.murri*.y services
in the irtTediata neighborhood?
2) Is the concentration of special needs populations lice elderly
and handicapped people less undersirable than concentrations of gemaral
occupancy housing for %per-income people?
The cc=ittze unanir;ously approved an amnended reconT-end:tion t a` a�dr_sses
these concerns.
Recommrendation as alrended by the ccr nittee: That the Metropolitan Council find:
1. The following proposals are, unless other-dice noted, consistent with the
Development Framework and other applicable policies of the Metropolitan
Development Guide and are ranked in priority order based on the Council 's
Housing Review Guidelines:
Referral
Rank Numrber Project Name Location
1. 12135-1 Northwest Mletro Housing Rogers
1 12137-1 'Walker on Kenzie St. Anthony
3 12135-1 Woodhaven Edina
4 12133-1 Red Rock Manor Newport
5 12139-1 Little Crow Elderly Hous i n3 St. Paul
2. Referral Mw-5er 12139-1, Little Cr-.W Elderly dousing, conflicts with the
Housing chap�er of the Me ropolitan Development Guide because of its
remoteness from retail services and its proximity to other assisted housing
developments. Notwithstanding these concerns, this project is ranted
number 5 in the event that sufficient funds become available to the region
to fund this and the other ranted projects as well as any projects for
handicapped resident,- that meet Metropolitan Council policies,
Respectfully suti tted,
Joan Campbell , Chair
LS9S42
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
• Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul , Minnesota 55101
291-6359
MEMORANDUM May 24, 1984
T0: Metropolitan and Community Development Committee
FROM: Housing and Aging Department Staff - Wayne Nelson and Judy Arends
SUBJECT: HUD Section 202 Program Applications
APPLICATIONS - LISTED IN THE ORDER RECEIVED
SEE RECOMMENOA.TIONS FOR RANKING
Referral Council
Applicant Location Number District
Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. Rogers 12135-1 13
Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. Edina 12136-1 11
',talker Methodist Residence. . . Inc. St. Anthony 12137-1 3
Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. Newport 12138-1 15
• St. Paul Inter-Tribal Housing Board St. Paul 12139-1 2
National Handicap Housing Institute Robbinsdale 12150-1 11
Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpis. St: Paul 12151-1 2
1
I. AUTHORITY TO REVIEW
The local Area HUD Office has submitted these applications for review and
comment through the Minnesota Intergovernmental Review Process although
HUD policy only requires coordination through the Intergovernmental Review
Process for Section 202 proposals larger than 200 units. The time period
for the Council 's review and comment regarding these applications expires
on June 7, 1984. Since staff review, committee deliberations and mailing
to applicants and Council members could not be cor::pieted for the Council 's
May 24 meeting, an extention of the review period to accommodate the
Council's June 14th meeting date has been requested from HUD.
II. BACKGROUND
The purpose of the Section 202 Program is to provide direct Federal loans
to private nonprofit corporations and consumer cooperatives for the
development of new or substantially rehabilitated housing facilities to
serve elderly, physically handicapped, or developmentally disabled
adults. Participation in the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments
Program is required for a minimum of 20 percent of the units in any
Section 202 project. Nor-mally, only proposals for subsidy of 100A of the
�. units are submitted.
Lsnoy
fC l j ..� o-ri-c:j?I pup do jal.;p c; f,,L j LS2d?o ;ti-, Spy 1CSuo:s aLr., (L
:F[1ap ja eq.% .JC1 a^j�?jL2n? 'aa0}tiaS
%�tuilC`JCO 10 SSaua11''m? TUECL jdd? ay: (Z
Suos.ad f 11a:. i a 1C_� „ra PC.td UO L On.:ZSuoO
/=.a:: p;:ppgns P ::;1; f.lsnoji,&.1d ZOu SP4 4'Lan:ILL'CO a;}S aga. .(I
' :fjdd? ;eta•; •
sp-juJC�S Supmol jc; Cif to pia 1vJ �T-E/•i� S" 'Llpd !'ZUO-z?i4 jo 4ulod
2 uoLykt u} ti;z;Sr.s cu-±z i 2 c4 5u}p.D; p..cn jz/,a sa% u.}CFO}ldd? 4oc3
o4pep ja at,: cr4 a jq?112nt
saALTEU_a;; j2 BuLsncy PS'SLss? 04', u: .ffaisaa/.ip 1aLq^, jaaq 2 eq un
jnsal au,_ •spoL_ jc1n; lno .o f.TB L1E/. P X12 ST1O::a uoLto? a/.L�tu:1 L;;t
ci .,jsuas Irpads ;o jEL.ua,od a:;; 1a;;o ;jnE 5u}snob; iegp.,
-1LTUI 1ntd 'I-PS at;. 6�11 S1OSUO:s dnc4 •a.:n;r.4 aL4 UL .}S
losuods r.o10 alp}; a:;T 2521nc�sLp
t o:: I i IA I.O L 10d j}Ou."loo 4+ ;DO j;uCO 40 SJ LPL L; S L4: -eq;, RadO4 S
•20-12 12 poaylcqu5Lau 015ULS xUp
} r } 1, 1 :� , !._, co a:;, o5P.cncos}p put
L C1Cva.1 O.r .Z.l -.I L•�.1.7 j 10 �-LSnv.J, -0 u.+ C..�rr�r
SaiO1100 j p:i:lo� q� d
SUC? •j11ap ja ;4 .1C; 11:4 C.Jd Z✓Z UDpzeS
:Curl-!g a ;O s>;o.jG aSJLr, ULt„�A P:;? a jdoa_ padc?oLpuEy 10; ;.ralp cd
�a.cbO-d ZuZ uo1==9S :Lun-gL ? c; ;Loo?tP? sL •s,Ua:�dolanap Su}snot'
P;^,s 1 S ST ..+;t5 .9 /.�T-L..C1d 2SOjO Ur, c:i5 i1U0 at,. S} aTtS !rl?d l
•S aU
uoo f.;}L'n=:.i p
p:2 ,L'innsai 'f.iaOC..S ? w.-.t1 Zet4KsiOS osI2 s} �j 's vs L1 :.a1
I,ta L1PA PUa 'dot's /..D?ma: d Q w2.1; a 1LW Z/t
Let„ E.J= aq C- s1=-addv a;Ls 1n% •;S au1 •unpLalcya;u SL4-4 c, epuappr u}
fll?np}ALpL} pagclosap a✓? Suo}.aoLjdd? a4-1 •SaaDit-ais c{ Ssaooa ;o Ste183
UL f..t1LgF:Lrs a;ts 1c; P;1a'+}.:o Un'-"LULU s_ jLDUMD ac„ -mu c•, 12adde
�Ls !n?d 'iS agt 'ng 11Y •saLo}lod 5u}L•U21d j TUSW;;o.c}AU? lrouno. t,•;Lx
ToL'~_uoo r, S1Gad..12 a jd.ad Cpiap.la 101 :ZLa dOla:.vp pasodoid OL,.4 ;o aeon
I:�iS�r�SIO 'III
•SUO;-21aP LSUOO u5 LSap
pU? `snotAl2s :o f;Lc•}xO1d `sa;TLiLgzd?o 1osUOds `S;LIMP Lsas .cos a1gplLtAP
se.-,.Ales f;Lunuuoo ;O SsaualM-a 'i.�Llnl •+o� Ot4 UL f,11'vpla at;; 10; Su}snot'
¢o uoj;Dns.suco r.;u pazLp}sans snop.a1d `u?jd uc.. Lly PS?LPLSgnS
s- lLD1nOO a1: '0 suOt;T�kdu4 `su:slad au;couL-Ma j so uoLz?.cTuaouco
acz :0 SDU2pL0A2 put SW-?jq:.Jd j?ZUOWU01L/.U8 S1.0 a?U?p}0/.? 'S0DLA1,?S ;0
iv.aj , 5uL:tla1 fTLlL4ciLns a;}s 1o; ?,,.,jr : Lr.1='}U.uu Lr,Lm aou?Lldc'02
:s:c;oE; LaAas 5U}".ojjo; at,; sa:llor.u} s;aarcld at„ ;o Sui�ut1 OLLL
•s;:.a,o1d p2Sodold ;0
ss L;LZOU ZI se"=4LO? at„ Put j punoO eq-- 0 Sj.lON ay' 4Snc q4 pa L;L,4uap}
eq A= ;ELr. suoL,toLldwj jr uawuojjAua 1c; a;tsuadwoO c; put surld swz3sfs
P"2 sgL:LOd 1QO01 Put leuOiBa1 faua;S}Suoo alnsty 7Z 1pAuassa
`t UOL;?;uo;U; SILI-L •paPLAO.Ad S.' u0L4tu:1O;uL a1Ls Lpun ultaq ;ouuEO
SStoO1d Pa}/.at 1;Uaw laao6.Ja;ul 2lcsauuM 9q' u5nc1y3 sLesodold ase4z
,o uo;,mLeAa s.l}oUnoO ay; -pv4Z pa2wo uL ussq set' 0ni.i •pap}AO1d 'ua8q
,cu Seq uo}:E'u: tml uo}-=:L :Ls aievm suosasd paddeDIpu?y ;o Supnoq
.JO; alp T-ISTZI ;up I-05IZI pua.-p-mu s 1211e a1 'suoL3eo}jdd? atr; ;o cm.L
•;:s a1L4ua at;; :nov5nc.Jt;; SEa1E L'?:L10d01;a:u u} S41un
191 f.j2:?:uLxcudda .co; o1grLien s} Su}pund •sZLun SOZ ;o jrcm, p Ao;
Su}p.•n; SuL%S?S SUOF,?:}ldde Z '".a}I.a1 r j 10; 'paALBn1 S?t{ LpunoO 24.L
4) on a relative basis the site location is situated in close.proximity to
• desirable community services such as shopping, transit, parks and
health services; and
5) design information supports a judgment that the project will be safe,
accessible and psychologically supportive for residents.
The following table shows how each application was rated.
Ser- Spon- Ser-
vice sor vice
Referral First Aware- Capa- Prox-
Number Project - Community Elderly ness bility mitt' Design Total
12135-1 Northwest Metro Hsg.- 1 1 1 1 1 5
Rogers
12136-1 Woodhaven - Edina 0 1 1 1 1 4
12137-1 Walker on Kenzie
St. Anthony
12138-1 Addition to Red Rock 0 1 1 0 1 3
Manor - Newport
12139-1 Little Crow Elderly 0 1 1/2 0 1 2-1/2
Housing - St. Paul
A ranking is reached by grouping the projects that were awarded the same
number of points (beginning with the highest number of points awarded) and
• listing them within groups according to the appropriateness of the size of each
proposal relative to the Allocation Plan elderly housing goal for the site
community. Of course, any proposals found to be in conflict with Council
policies will be deleted from the final priority ranking.
The ranking based an points awarded and the status relative to the community's
Allocation Plan goal for housing of the elderly is as follows:
Number of
Units Over
Referral Points Elderly
Rank Number Project Name-Units Proposed Awarded Goal
1 12135-1 Northwest Metro Housing - 24 5 N/A
1 12137-1 Walker on Kenzie - 45 5 37
3 12136-1 Woodhaven - 38 4 51
4 12138-1 Red Rock Manor - 24 3 22
5 12139-1 Little Crow - 35 2.S within
The final factor to be evaluated is community efforts in support of assisted
housing for low- and moderate-income families. Family housing achievements are
considered because the Council's Subsidized Housing Review Guidelines require
that funding of housing for the elderly should only be awarded to communities
that have made significant efforts to achieve the goals for assisted family
housing specified for therm in the Allocation Plan. Significant effort is
defined as the achievement of a community's current or previous Allocation Plan
goal or the submission of an acceptable plan to achieve the current Allocation
Plan goal . Since only Me of the anticipated housing assistance funding has
actually been committed during the 1980-83 Allocation Plan period, however,
this standard will be applied for the current period.
-The following table contains the data used to detz .,pine the suitability of the
proposals based .on family housing achievements zsccrding to the Council's
Subsidized Housing Allocation Plan.
Current Previous '
Family Family
Referral Goal Goal
Number Protect - Ccr=uni ty Units Achiev. Achievement
12135-1 Northwest - Rogers 24 N/A - no goals for
rural centers
12135-1 Woodhaven - Edina 38 3: 401%
12137-1 Walker on Xenzie 45 040, 453
St. Anthony
12138-1 Red Rock Maror - Newport, 24 205% 1304
12139-1 Little Cr-.,w - St. Paul 35 163: 900
Of the potential site car:.uni ties, Edina and St. Anthony have failed to achieve
the 7:4 standard for the current period or t:,-.e entire Allocation P i an goal Tor
the previous period. Each is submitting a plan to achieve its `air snare of
assisted housing for families. It is anticipated treat these plans will discuss
revenue bond, community development, rehabilitation and other initiatives that
will demonstrate that appropriate effort is underway to address assisted
housing needs. Copse-uently, all of the ccn-t:pities c.mpet•'.ng for the
available Section 202 prcgra.-.i funds aprear z have provided or are taking steps
to provide for their share of affordable housing c;portL:nities for families.
TV. RECOMMENOATION - the Ccuncil 'ands that:
I. The foi 1 owl ng proposal s are cons Is tart ,41 tti the Oevel a;ment F rar._,,nrk
ti
and the other applicable policies of the Metrcpoiitan Development Guide
and are ranked in priority order based capon Lhe Council's Scusing
Review Gaidelines.
Referral
Rank Number Project Mare Location
1 12135-1 Northwest "etro Housing Rcsers
1 12137-1 Walker on Kenzie St. An:.',-_ny
3 12136-1 Woodhaven Edina
4 12138-1 Red Rock Man-r ANewport
2. Referral number 12139-1, Little Crcw Elderly Housing, conflicts with
the Housing chapter of Liz Metropolitan Oevel oilmen, Guide beezuse o`
Its remoteness r'rcm re:ail serr'c:s and its proximity to other assisted
housing deve i cpra_n ts.
Ls:so2
wAHCS2
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
• Name of Project: Northwest Metro Housing Council File No. 12135-1
Municipality Rogers County Hennepin Council District 13
Applicant: Archdiocese of St. Paul Approving Agency (I File No.) HUD (092-EH208-
and Minneapolis WAH-L8
I. Description of Project: -
Program Category Designation: Section 202/Section 8
Number and Type of Units: 24 units: 22-18R, 1-19R for Handicapped, 1-28R
Purchase Price or Monthly Rental : Up to 30% of tenant income: S454-S572
II. Proposed Project Will be Located Within:
Pre-1980 Urban Service Area 1981-1990 Urban Service Area
Freestanding Growth Center Rural Center X Rural Service7—rea _
III. Relation to Local Comprehensive Plan and Review by Local Community:
Yes No
Local comprehensive plan reviewed by Council ....•......... -y-
Local comprehensive plan found consistent ............ .... —R'-
Project compatible with local comprehensive plan .........
Project reviewed by local planning commission ............
All necessary municipal approval granted ................. -'R—
IV. Availability of Services to Site:
• Sewer Service (Central X Individual )
Water Service (Central 'T' Individual —T
Metro highway system enTrance within three miles ......... X
Mass transit within 1/2 mile .................... .........
Park Area within 1/2 to 1 mile ........................... -X-
Shopping centers: —'
Neighborhood (grocery, drug, laundry, gas) within 1/2 mile X
Community (variety, clothing, restaurant) with 2 miles.. -T'
Regional Ctr. (diversified services) within 10 miles....
Day Care within 8 to 10 miles ............................ 1TjA
Health Care facilities within 30 minutes ................. `T-
Y. School capacity adequate. to accommodate additional
enrollment generated by proposed development ...... ....... N/A
VI. Development Will Adversely Affect the Following Policies or Systems:
Yes No
Environmental .... . -'X Development Framework. X
Transportation ... . X Airports ... .......... X
Sewer ............. Other Impacts ........
Parks b Open Space.
VII. Diversity of Housing Type and Costs:
Will project serve most urgent needs of low- and moderate-
income group: ................................ ............ X
Will project serve to diversify housing costs in community? -T"
�
Will project serve to diversify housing type in community?
*See Comments
LS9792
• Northwest Metro Housing
File No. 12135-1
Comments
This proposal is for construction of a 24-unit develop�rant at 12SOS John
Milless Drive in Rogers. The building would have 23 one-bedroon units
(including one for a wheelchair user) and a taro-bedroom unit for a resident
manager. Construction would be financed through the Section 202 Program and
Section 8 funds would be used to .subsidize terant rental payments. One-bedroom
rents are protected to rent at $454 per mcrth and the too-bedrocnt managers
unit at S:72.
The proposal Is consistent wi th the cc.:.pr:hznsive plan that has been r_vle-wed
by the Metropolitan Ccurcii . Central set-ar and water are available and
metropolitan interceptor and treat-ent capacity is adequate.
The site offers good access to residential services. It is adJacent to
neighborhood ccnvenierce and ccsmunity-level sho;pfng. Regional shoppfng is
located within twt-1 minutes. Medical facilities are available nearby-and a
hospital can be reached in less than thirty minutes. post office, librar'I
and grocery are within a blcck of the site.
No negative Impact en the environment or iretropol f ten services is anticipated
if the proposal is Implemented. air and vehicle traffic are rot likely t:
detrimentally affect the intended residentiai site use. Hec}use of its
proximity, about a block frc,-,t Highway I-94, noise levels may exceed stats and
federal stardards for residential use. It is the policy OF the win-esota
Department of Trans;crtation and the Federal Hich-day Acminfstr3:fcn not t:
provide noise abatement for new level epment constructed ad f ac ent to a mail or
transportation facility. The develocnent should analyze the siltation and
provide any necessary measures to mitigate traffic noises such as earth
bearing. ,Mn/DOT will provide guidance in this area u*on request.
It should be noted 465at no grading, surface drainage or sof i suitability
information was pr=ovided for this review. Consequently, alt! cu;h no problems
are anticipated, a-f related issues re?arding this s;ta mere not evaluated
within the scope of this review.
159793
Referral No. 12135-1
Northwest Metro Housing
POINT RATING FOR RANKING PURPOSES
First Project for the Elderly in the Community 1
A point was awarded because this would be the first such assisted new
construction project for the elderly in Rogers.
Awareness of Community Services 1
A point was awarded because services available in the community and the
linkages that have been/will be made between the project and community
agencies are described.
Sponsor Capability I
A point was awarded because the sponsor, Community Development Corporation
of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, has developed and manages
several high quality housing developments for elderly people in the Metro
• Area.
Proximity of Services 1
A point was awarded because the site is adjacent to a coun.unity-level
shopping center that includes a full range of desired commercial services.
Parks, churches, and health care services are conveniently accessible.
Design 1
A point was awarded because the building includes several key design
features such as pass-through counter/table in the kitchen, low window sill .
to facilitate use by the elderly, and adequate storage. Design decisions
were made based upon input frcm potential residents.
Total Points Awarded 5
LS9794
{
C=4ENTS AND RECOMM UDATIONS OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Name of Project: 'Woodhaven Council File' No. 12136-1
Municipality Edina County Hennepin Council District 11 �.
Applicant: Archdiocese of St. Paul Approving Agency (3 File Ho.) HUD (092-
and Minneapolis WAH-L8
I. Description of Project:
Program Category Designation: Section 202/Section 8
Number and Type of Units: 38 units (35.13R, 2.188 SCCP, 1-23R for c, nacer)
Purchase Price or Monthly Rental : Up to 301 of tenant income: 3454 S $572
II. Proposed Project Will be Lccated Within:
Pre-1980 Urban Service Area X 1981.1950 Urban Service Area
Freestanding Growth Center — Rural Center Rural Service-7-raa
III. Relation to Local Comprehensive Plan and Revle-w by Local Corrnunity:
Yes No
Local comprehensive plan reviewed by Council ............. - "-
Local comprehensive plan found consistent ................ -"
Project compatible with local comprehensive plan .. . ...... -T-
Project reviewed by. lecal planning c:m:sissien ...... .... .. " A
All necessary municipal approval granted ................. T
IV. Availability of Services to Site:
Sewer Service (Central X Individual ) �
Water Service (Central -7- individual --7
Metro highway system entrance within three miles ... .. .... X
Mass transit it-hin 1/2 mile ................ ............ .
Park Area thin 1/2 �.o 1 mile ...... .......... ........... �
w
Shopping canters:
Neighborhood (grccery, dreg, laundry, gas) Kittiin 1/2 mile X
C -.-,unity (variety, clothing, restaurant.) with 2 files..
Regional C tr. (diversified services) wl thin 10 miles... . -7-
Day Care within 8 to 10 miles .+7
Health Care facilities within :0 minutes ...... . ..... ..... -r
Y. School capacity adequate to accc=odat_ additional
enrollment generated by proposed development ...... ... ... . NIA
VI. Develc;rent. Will Adversely Affecct the Following ?olicies or Sy stars:
Yes No
Environmental -X Develocr-ent Framework. X
Transportation . .. . —' Airports ............. _ �'
Sewer ....... .. . ... Other Impacts ........ _ -v--
Parks b Open Space.
VII. Diversity of Housing Type and Costs:
Will project serve Trost urgent needs of lour- and mcderata-
income group: . ... .. .... ... .. ... ............ ......... Y
Will project serve tr diver`ify housing casts in ccr;.uni y? x
Wil l prof e=t serve `z di versi`y housing y;e in C=nuni ty? "A
'See Cc�ents
LS9752
• Woodhaven
File No. 12136-1
Comments '
This proposal is for construction of a 38-unit residence on 50th Street, two
blocks west of France Avenue. Construction would be financed through the
Section 202 Program and Section 8 funds would be used to subsidize tenant
rental payments. One-bedroom rents are projected at $454 per month and the two-
bedroom manager's unit at $572.
The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan that has been reviewed
by the Metropolitan Council. Central sewer and water are available and
metropolitan interceptor and treatment capacity is adequate.
The proposed site offers excellent access to residential services. Two regular
transit lines operate within two blocks. The site is adjacent to a supermarket
and a full-service community-level shopping area containing a bank, drug store,
restaurants, medical offices, barber shop, beauty shop, theater, and other
retail. stores.
No negative impact on the environment or metropolitan services is anticipated
if the proposal is implemented. Air and vehicle traffic are not likely to
detrimentally affect the intended residential site use. It should be noted
that no grading, surface drainage or soil suitability information was provided
for this review. Consequently, although no problems are anticipated, any
• related issues regarding this site were not evaluated within the scope of this
review.
LS9753 '
Referral No. 12135-1
Woodhaven
POINT RATING FOR RANKING PURPOSES
First Project for the Elderly in the Co=unity 0
No point was awarded because a subsidized housing develo;ment for older
persons has previously been constructed in Edina.
Awareness of Commun ity Services 1
A point was awarded because services available in the cz.-muni ty and the
linkages that have been/will be made betweeen the project and co=unity
agencies are described.
Sponsor Capability I
A point was awarded because the sponsor, Cermunity Developrant Cor;cratien
of the archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, has developed and manages
several high quality housing devel cpaments for elderly pecpl a in the Metro
A rea.
Proximity of Services 1
A point was awarded because the sit-a is within a block or two of a carplet_
range of desirable c_, rcial ser-tices.
Design I
A point was awarded -because the tu{lding will include several key design
features that will faci 1 ita:a occupancy by older persons.
Total Points Awarded s
LKSC03
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Name of Project: Walker on Kenzie Council File No. 12137-1
Municipality St. Anthony County Hennepin Council District 3
Applicant: Walker Methodist Resi- Approving Agency (b File No.) HUD (092-
dense b Health Service Inc. WAH-L8
I. Description of Project:
Program Category Designation: Section 202/Section 8
Number and Type of Units: 45-18R units
Purchase Price or Monthly Rental : Up to 304 of tenant income:' S466
II. Proposed Project Will be Located Within:
Pre-1980 Urban Service Area X 1981-1990 Urban Service Area
Freestanding Growth Center Rural Center Rural Service'A-rea
III. Relation to Local Comprehensive Plan and Review by Local Community:
Yes No
Local comprehensive plan reviewed by Council -7- —
Local comprehensive plan found consistent ................ "R'
Project compatible with local comprehensive plan .........
Project reviewed by local planning commission ............
All necessary municipal approval granted ................. -7-
• IV. Availability of Services to Site:
Sewer Service (Central X Individual )
Water Service (Central -T- Individual
Metro highway system entrance within three miles ......... X
Mass transit within 1/2 mile ..... ........................ -7-
Park Area within 1/2 to 1 mile ..... ...................... -X- '-
Shopping centers: —'
Neighborhood (grocery, drug, laundry, gas) within 1/2 mile X
Community (variety, clothing, restaurant) with 2 miles.. -r _
Regional Ctr. (diversified services) within 10 miles.... -7- _
'Day Care within 8 to 10 miles ............. ............... ATK _
Health Care facilities within 30 minutes .................
V. School capacity adequate to accommodate additional
enrollment generated by proposed development ............. N/A
VI. Development Will Adversely Affect the Following Policies or Systems:
Yes No
Environmental ..... _ -T Development Framework. X
Transportation .... —' -7- Airports .............
Sewer ............. '— -7- Other Impacts ........
Parks b Open Space. -'R"
VII. Diversity of Housing Type and Costs:
Will project serve most urgent needs of low- and moderate-
income group: ............................................ X
Will project serve to diversify housing costs M community? -T, --'
Will project serve to diversify housing type in community? -'
*See Comments
LS9762
'Walker on Kenzie
File No. I2I37-I
Coements
Walker on Kenzie is a proposal for construction of a 45-unit develop-ment in St.
Anthony at 2626 Kenzie Terrace N.E. —Me plan is for one-bedroon units, five of
which will be wheelchair accessible. Construction would be firarced through
the Section 202 Program and Section 8 money would be used to subsidize tanant
rental payments. Initial rents are projected at $466 per month.
St. Anthony's comprehensive plan has been reviewed by the Metropolitan
Council . This proposal is consistent Nits the comprehensive plan. Central
sewer and water are available and metropoli-"n interceptor and treatment
capacity is adequate.
The site offers excellent access to residential services. Two regular transit
lines operate within two blocks of the site. An adjacent cam-unity-level
shopping center contains a pharmacy, bank, hardware stor:, library, bomlIng
alley and grccerl store. A regional shopping center is lecatad about one and
one-half miles from t!�e site. A park is about a half mile away. Medical and
dental clinics are available nearby and, t7m hospitals can be easily reached in
fi fteen minutes.
No negative impact an the environment or metrapalitan services is anticipated
If the proposal is implemented. Air and vehicle traffic are not likely to
detrimentally af;;ct the intended residential site use. It 'should be noted
that no grading, surface drainage or soil suitability info .nation was provided
for this review. Consequently, although no problems are anticipated, ary :10
related issues regarding this site ware not evaluated within the scope of this
review.
LS976 3
i
N -
Referral o. 12137 1
Walker on Kenzie
POINT RATING FOR RANKING PURPOSES
First Project for the Elderly in the Community 1
A point was awarded because this would be the first assisted new
construction project for the elderly in St. Anthony.
Awareness of Community Services i
A point was awarded because information was provided on the awareness of
community services and the potential linkages to be made between the housing
project and community agencies.
• Sponsor Capability 1
A point was awarded because the sponsor, Talker Methodist Residence and
• Health Services Inc., has developed and currently manages housing for the
elderly including apartments and nursing homes.
Proximity of Services 1
A point was awarded because the site is adjacent to a full-service
community shopping center (including grocery, pharmacy, bank, library, and
other amenities) and is adjacent to a regular transit line. Parks,
churches, and health care services are conveniently accessible.
Design 1
A point was awarded because the building will include several. key
design features that will facilitate occupancy by older people.
Total Points Awarded 5
LS9764
COMMENTS AND RECO,MMENDATIOINS OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Name of Project: Addition to Red Rock Manor Council File Me. . 12138-1
Municipality Hewport County Washington Council District 15 ;..f .
Applicant: Archdiocese of St. Paul Approving Agency (9 File No.) HUD (092-EX207-
and Minneapolis WAN-L8
I. Description of Project:
Program Category Designation: Section 202/Section 8
Number and Type of Units: 24 one-bedroom units
Purchase Price or Monthly Rental: Up to 304 of tenant income: 14S4
I1. Proposed P rcj ect Will be Located Within:
Pre-1980 Urban Service Area X 1981-1990 Urban Service Area
Freestanding Grow`4 Center ._ Rural Center Rural Service'Trra _
III. Relation to Local Comprehensive Plan and Review by Lccal Cerrmunity:
Yes No
Local comprehensive plan reviewed by Council ............. -r -'
Local comprehensive plan found consistent ... ... .......... -T- —'
Project compatible with 1ocai comprehensive plan ......... 'X _
• Project reviewed by 'local planning corrmission .. ..........
All necessary municipal approval granted ....... ..........
IV. Availability of Services to Site:
Sewer Service (Central X Individual )
Water Service (Central -Z- Individual =
Metro highway system en Trce within three criles X
Mass transit within 1/2 mile .. ............ ............. .. -'-
Park Area within I/2 to I mile .. ..... ............. ....... -T-
Shopping cerr tars: '-
• NeigrSorhood (;roeery, drug, laundry, gas) -within 1/2 mile X
C . unity (variety, clothing, ' restaurant) with 2 iriles. . -T-
Regional Ctr. (diversified services) within 10 miles.... -X
Day Care within 8 to 10 miles .. . .. . .... .... . . ... . ...... .. �i
Healty Care facilities within 0 minutes .. ..... . . ...... . . "X
V. School capacity adequate to accommcdata additional
enrollment generated by proposed develo;irent .... .. ....... N/A
VI. Oevelepment Will Adversely Affect the Following Policies or Sy3tams:
Yes No
Environmental . . . .. -" Development F ramero rk. X
Transpor•3tion .... _ Airports ........... .. "-'- -7-
Sewer ... ..... ..... '— -X Other impacts .... .... -'- -7-
Parks b Open Space. -X
VII. Diversity of Housing Type and Costs:
Will project serve most urgent reeds of lcw- and moderate-
income group: .. .. ..... . . ...... .. . .... ....... ..... ........ X
Will project serve to diversify housing costs in community? -T" r
Will project same to diversiry hcusin ?
*Se- Ccrr ants
LS9782 '
• - Addition to Red Rock Manor
File No. 12138-1
Comments
This proposal is for construction of a 24-unit addition to Red Rock Manor, a 54-
unit Section 202 project completed about two years ago at 1421 Tenth Avenue.
Construction would be financed through the Section 202 Program and Section 8
funds would be used to subsidize tenant rental payments. The one-bedroom units
are projected at $454 per month. The construction cost per unit is anticipated
to be 15 - 20 percent less than similiar entirely new projects due to savings
from the use of community rooms, laundary facilities and utilities in the "
existing building.
The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan that has been reviewed
by the Metropolitan Council. Central sewer and water are available and
metropolitan interceptor and treatment capacity is adequate. A conditional use
permit will be required by the city to allow the addition.
The site offers reasonable access to residential services. A bus line,
grocery. pharmacy, beauty shop, bakery, hardware, A A w and a service station
are situated at distances of two to five blocks.
No negative impact on the environment or metropolitan services is anticipated
If the proposal is implemented. Air and vehicle traffic are not likely to
detrimentally affect the intended residential site use. It should be noted
• that no grading, surface drainage or soil suitability information was provided
for this review. Consequently, although no problems are anticipated, any
related issues regarding this site were not evaluated within the scope of this
rev i ew.
LS9783
Referral No. I2I38-I
Addition to Red Rock Manor ' ,"-
POINT RATING FOR RANKING PURPOSES
First Project for the Elderly in the Cc=unity 0
No point was awarded because the proposal is for an addition to an existing
project.
Awareness of Cc=uni ty Services I
A point was awarded because services available in the cc-muni ty and the
excellent linkages that currently exist between the pr-eject and co=unity
agencies are described.
Sponsor Capability I
A point was awarded because the sponsor, Community Development Cororaticn
of the Archdiocese of St. Paul anal jMInneapolis, has developed and manages
several high quality housing develop n-ent's for elderly pecpl a in the Metro
Area.
Proximity of Services 0
No point was awarded because the sit: is somewhat remote from a ccmplete
range of desirable cc=errial services in ccmiparison with competing
projects.
Design 1
A point was awarded because tie building will include several key design
features that will facilitate cccupancy by older persons.
Total Points Awarded 3
LS9i84 ,
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Name of Project: Little Crow Elderly Housing, Council Fite No. 12139-1
Municipality St. Paul County Ramsey Council District 2
Applicant: St. Paul Inter-Tribal Approving Agency (b File No.) HUD (092-EH203-
Housing Board WAH-L8
I. Description of Project:
Program Category Designation: Section 202/Section 8
Number and Type of Units: 35-1BR units
Purchase Price or Monthly Rental: Up to 30% of tenant income: SS40
II. Proposed Project Will be Located Within:
Pre-1980 Urban Service Area X 1981-1990 Urban Service Area
Freestanding Growth Center — Rural Center Rural Service rea
III. Relation to Local Comprehensive Plan and Review by Local Community:
Yes No
Local comprehensive plan reviewed by Council ............. -T'
Local comprehensive plan found consistent ................ -T-
Project compatible with local comprehensive plan ......... -T-
Project reviewed by local planning commission ............
All necessary municipal approval granted .................
• IV. Availability of Services to Site:
Serer Service (Central X Individual )
Water Service (Central -7- Individual
Metro highway system enTrance within three miles ......... X
Mass transit within 1/2 mile .............................
Park Area within 1/2 to 1 mile ........................... —'
Shopping centers: — --
Neighborhood (grocery, drug, laundry, gas) within 1/2 mile X
Community (variety, clothing, restaurant) with 2 miles.. -T" —'
Regional Ctr. (diversified services) within 10 miles.... 'A' '--
ay Care within 8 to 10 miles ............................ 1Tj1C
Health Care facilities within 30 minutes ................. -'R'-
Y. School capacity adequate to accommodate additional
enrollment generated by proposed development ............. N/A
VI. Development Will Adversely Affect the Following Policies or Systems:
Yes No
Environmental ..... Development Framework. X
"�' Airports .............
Transportation .... —'
Sewer ............. Other Impacts ........
Parks b Open Space.
VII. Diversity of Housing Type and Costs:
Will project serve most urgent needs of low- and moderate-
Income group: ............................................ X
Will project serve to diversify housing costs in community? — —"
project serve to diversify housing type in community? 'R' —"
*See Comments
LS9772
Little Crow Elderly Housing Project
File No. .12139-1
C=cents
This proposal is for construction of a 36=unit apartment building for elderly
persons located between Rivoli and Otsego Streets a short distance north of
Lafayette Road. The building would have 35 one-bedroom units initially renting
for S540 per month and a resident manager's unit. Construction would be
financed through the Section 202 Program and Section 8 funds would be used to
subsidize tenant rental payments.
The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan that has been reviewed
by the Metropolitan Council . Central sewer and water are available and
Metropolitan interceptor and treatment capacity is adequate.
The site is near the edge of a residential neighborhood that bord:rs a
eaMecereial/industrial area. It is remate from desirable residential cc=er:tal
services. There is no pharmacy, retail variety shopping, beauty/barber shop,
bank or library within a half-mile and the closest grocery is three
blocks away. The site is near a park and a regular bus line on Lafayette
Road. The remoteness of the site from residential coMrercial services and
particularly a pharmacy conflicts with Council policy for accessibility of
assisted housing to c=ercial services.
The site is adjacent to a 36-unit Section 202 prof e.t of the National Handicap
Housing Institute that is nearing completion. It is within three blocks of
Labor Plaza, a 67-unit Section 202 project for elderly people. Another Section ' :•
202 project in such close proximity to the others would conflict with Council
policy discouraging the concentration of housing for law-income people.
It is hoped that these conflicts with regional policies for the accessibility
and careful distribution of assisted housing will not discourage the sponsor
from finding a more suitable site in the future. A high proportion of
previously selected Section 202 pr:posals were refined over a number of years
prior to being selected.
No negative impact an the environment or metrcoolitan services is anticipated
if the proposal is implemented. Air and vehicle traffic are not likely to
detrin*ntally affect the intended residential site use. It should be noted
that no grading, surface drainage or sail suitability inrornaticn was provided
for this review. Consequently, although no prcblemrs are anticipated, any
related issues regarding this site were not evaluated within the scope of this
review.
LS9774
i
Referral No. 12139-1
Little Crow Elderly. Housing Project Inc.
POINT. RATING FOR RANKING PURPOSES
First Project for the Elderly in the Community 0
� No point was-.awarded because a .subsidized housing development for older -
persons .has previously been constructed nearby in St. Paul.
Awareness of Community Services 1
A point was awarded because services available in the community and the
linkages that have been/will be made between the project and community
agencies are described.
Sponsor Capability .5
A half point was awarded. because the sponsor has documented capability -for
planning and providing social services to various client populations. but
• does not appear to have extensive experience. managing and operating housing
for the elderly. The- sponsor might benefit from a cooperative relationship
with an organization having experience in the operation and management of
housing for the elderly.
Proximity- Services 0
i
No point was awarded because the site is more than three blocks from most
desirable commercial services and more than a half-mile from the following:
retail shopping, pharmacy. bank and library.
Design 1
0
A point was awarded because the building will include several key design
. features that will facilitate occupancy by older persons.
Total Points Awarded 2.5
r
CITY 'OF 'ST.- ,ANTHONY
5 REQUEST FOR:`H..R_A. ACTION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Submitted Type of ,.Action Requested Agenda Ttem hummer
Resolution New Busimess=2
June 22, 1984 Ordinance
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion 'Title Walton Property
Other
June 26' lg84
;} ----------------------------------------------------------
TO: Chairman and H.R.A. Members
FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Attached are three cash flows for the proposed
Walbon redevelopment project at 33rd and Highcrest. Schedule A is for a 32 unit
townhouse development with no land sale proceeds.. Schedule B is for the same
development with land sale proceeds of $4,000 per unit. Schedule C is for a
single family subdivision of 9 lots witty domes valued at $100,000 each, all of
which would be totally completed by January .of 1987.
As you will note, all of the proposals riequIre a 25 year bond issue and all require
a tax levy to cover the debt. Schedule B, however, is very close to being self-
supporting. With a lower land purchase cost and a higher level of land sale
• proceeds, it is our opinion that the project is feasible. We should discuss the
project at the meeting, but based on this information, if you wish to proceed,
several actions are necessary.
1 . Authorize a land and building appraisals of the property.
2. Authorize a relocation appraisal .
3. Authorize the Executive Director to begin negotiations with Dick Krier for an
agreement for redevelopment consultant services.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the appraisals be ordered and that we get
a written agreement with Dick Krier.
CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
�,
0 Rk,
SPRINGSTED.
INCORPORATED
-PUBLIC FINANCE
ADVISORS
21 June 1984
Mr. David Childs,,City Manager
City of St: ,Anthony
330.1. Silver Lake Road '
St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418 a
i RE: •Tax Increment. FeasibiIity.of Redevelopmen#,,of S ba yRAAe1I.
Dear Dave:. .
a Based onsa letter received from Dick Krier-,dated,May 22, 1984, and.also based.
on our telephone conversation of this week,:-we have calculated three .tax
increment cash f low 'schedules based on various assumptions with respect to
project costs and tax increment income. Fol,low.ing is a table showing the
computation of the three. bond issues; for whi6h'ytheM cash flow schedules were-
prepared:
Schedule A :. Sdkxedu]e B Schedule C
Land Acquisition Costs $275,000 =$-,275,000 $ 275,000•
' Less: Land Sale Proceeds
- _A(°l 28,000) (120'.000)
Relocation Costs 40,000 40,000 409000
Issuance Costs &..Admin, 31 ,500 31 ,500 31 ,500
Contingencies 33,500- 33,500 35,840
Capitalized Interest 145,000 133,000 52,660
Total Bond Issue $525,000 .$ 385,000 $ 315,000
You will note when examining Schedules A, B and C, that columns I through -5
show the principal and estimated interest payments due in each year of the
program, utilizing a 25-year life of the District. We have not included the
statutorily required 5% overlevy as it would tend to distort these computations
somewhat.
Column 6 of the debt maturity schedules shows the availability of tax
increment revenues from development occurring within the District. The
i assumptions used in determining the amount of this income are as follows:
i
i
Schedule A Schedule B Schedule C
Assessors Market Value $. 789000 $ 78,.000 $100,000
y Assessed Value Per Uni t- 16,200 16,200 220800
i No. of Units 32 32 9
a
Total Assessed Value $518,400 $5189400 $205,200
Less: Base Value (65,300) (65,300) (65,300)
i Captured Assessed Value $453, 100 $453, 100 $139,900
3
4 Incremental Income @ 100 Mills $ 45,310 $ 45,310 $ 139,990
800 Osborn Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102-(612) 222-4241
250 North Sunnyslope Road; Brookfield, Wisconsin 53005(414) 782-8222
Mr. David Childs :
21 June 1984 --
Page 2
It is assumed the development indicated on the previous page is 100% in place
and valued by the assessor as of January 2, 1987. The tax cycle would then
result in this valuation being available to produce an increment with the 1987
levy, to be collected during 1988; and fully available' to make 'the� February' F,
1,989 principal payment on the bonds. We-have assumed a partial increment of
40% of the full increment is available for assessment purposes as of January 2,,
1986. a
The relatively slow.-time line for development of this property result's in the
need for a considerable amount of capitalized interest and adversely affects the
cash flow feasibility of these projects. Column 7 shows the difference between
the income column and the total estimated debt service, which is, with
exception of a few lines, a shortfall. Column 8 shows any- surpluses on a
cumulative basis and column 9 shows the estimated tax'' levies required to
support each issue:
If you have any questions relating•to the attached, please contact us.,
Cordially,
Richard L. Treptow
Vice President
Enclosures
cc: 'Mr. Richard Krier, Derrick Companies
/gf
r•
CITY'OF ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA PREPARED JUNE 19, 1984
SS2S,000 -GENERAL OBLIGATION BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
TAX.INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984
DATED: .9/ 1/1984
MATURE: 2/ 1
11.000% ANNUAL
ANNUAL SURPLUS/ CUMULATIVE ANNUAL
LEVY MATURE PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL INCOME (-DEFICIT) SURPLUS' LEVY
.(1) (2) l3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) .
1984 1986" 0' 81,813 81,813 145,000• . 63,187 77,733 14,546
1985 1987 5,,000 57,750 62,750 - 0 62,7.50- 29,529 14,546
1986 1988 5,000 57,200 62,200 18,124 44,07.6- 0 14,'547
1987 1989 5,000 56,650 61,650 45,310 16',340- 0l 16,340
1988 1990 10,000 56,100 66,100 45,310 20,790- 0 20,796.
1989 1.991 10,000 55,000 65,000 4S.,3It 190690- 0 19,690
1990 1992• 10,000 53,900 63,900 45,310 18,590- 0 181590
1991 1993 10,000 52,800 62,800 45,310 17,490= 0 17,490
1992 1944 10,000 51,700 6`1,700 45,310 16•,390- 0 16,390
1993 1995 15,000 50,600' 65,600• 45010 20,290- 0 20,290..
1994. 1996 15;000 48,950• 63,950 450.3, 110 18,640- 0 18,640
1995' 1991 15',000 47,300' 62,300 45,310 16,990- 0 16,990
1996, 1998 20,000' 45,650 65,650 45,310. 20,340= 0 20.;340
1997 1999 20',000 43_,456 63,450 45310 18,140- 0 18,140
1999 2000 25.,,000 41;250' 66,250 45,,31'0 20,940- 0 20,940
1999' 2001 25,000, 38;500, 63,500' . 45,310 18.1.99- 0- 18,190
2000- 2002 30,000 35.,750 65,750 45=,.310 20,440.= 0 20,440
2001. 2003 30,000' 32,450- 62,450 45,310 17,140- 0 17,140
2062 200-4 35,000•' 29,150 64,15'0 45,310 1&,840- 0 18,840
2003 21005 40,000 25,300' 65,300' 45,.310 19,990- 0'- 19,990
2004 2006' 45,000 20,900 65,900" 45,310 20,590- 0 20,590'
2005 2007 50,000 15,950 65,950 45,310 20,640- 0 20,640
2006 2008 55,000 10,450 65,450 45.,310 20,140- 0 20,140
2007' 2009 40,000 4,400 44,400 45,310 910. 910 0
TOTALS: $525,000 $1,012063 $1,537,963 $1,114,634 $423,329- $424,239
1 -
v
BOND YEARS: 9,209 ANNUAL INTEREST COST: $1,012,963 'INCLUDES CAPITALIZED
AVERAGE MATURITY: 17.54 DISCOUNT (PREMIUM) : $0 INTEREST OF $145,000
AVG. ANNUAL RATE: 11.000% TOTAL INTEREST COST: $1,012,963
CITY 00 ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA PREPARED JUNE 20, 1984
$385,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
TAX INCREMENT. BONDS, SERIES 1984
DATED: 9/ 1/1984
MATURE: 2/ 1
11.000A 'ANNUAL
ANNUAL SURPLUS/ CUMULATIVE ANNUAL
LEVY MATURE PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL INCOME (-DEFICIT) SURPLUS LEVY .
(3) (47. (5) (6)'. (7) (8) (9)
1984 1'986 0 59,996 5.9,996 133,000•. 73;004 73,004 0
1985 1987 ` 5,000 42,350 41,350 0 47,350- 25,654 0
1`986 .1,998 5,000 41,,800 46,800 18,124 28,676 0 3,022
1987 1989 5,000 41,250 46,250 .45,•310 940- 0 940
1988 1990 5,,000 46,1700 45,700 45,310 3'90- 0 390
.1989 1991 -;5,,.000 40,150 45,150 45,•310 160 166 0
'1990. •1992 '5,000 '39,-600 44,600 45,310 710 870 0
1991 1993 10,000 •39,050 44,050 49,°310 31,740- 0 2,870
1992 1944 10,000 37,950 47,950 45,310 2.,'640- 0 2,,640
•1993 1995 10,000 •3'6,850 46,850. 45,310 1,540- 0 "1,540
1994 1996 10•;000 `35,750 45,750 '45,310 440- 0 440
1995 •1997 10.,000 34,650 '44;650 45,3.10 660 660 0
1996 1998 15,000 33,550 48,550 45,310 3,240- 0 2,580
1997 1999 15,,000 31,900 46,900 45,310 11590- 0 '1,590
1998 2000 15;000 36,250 45,250 45,310 60 60 0
1999 2001 •20,000 28,600 48,600 45,310 3;290- 0 3;230,
2000 2002 26,000 26,400 46,400 45,310 1,090- 0 1,090
2001 2003 25,,000 24,200 49.200 45,_310 3,890- 0 3,890
2.002 2004 25,000 21,450 46,450 45,310 1,140- 0 1,140
2003 2005 30,000 18,700 49,700 45,310 3,390- 0 3,390
2004 2006 30,000 15,400 45,400 45,310 90- 0 90
2005 2007 35,000 12,100 47,100 45010 1,790- 0 1,790
2006 2008 4'0,000 8•,250 48,250 45,310 2,940- 0 2,940
-2007 2009 35,000 3,850 38,850 45,310 6,460 6,460 0
TOTALS: $385,000 $744,746 $1,129,746 $1,102,634 $27,112- $33,572
BOND YEARS: 6,770 ANNUAL INTEREST COST: $744,746 •INCLUDES CAPITALIZED
AVERAGE MATURITY: 17.59 DISCOUNT (PREMIUM) : $0 INTEREST OF $133,000
AVG. ANNUAL RATE: 11.000% TOTAL INTEREST COST: $744,746
C
r
m
WN;
J
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA PREPARED JUNE 19, 1984
$315,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984
DATED: 9/ 1/1984
MATURE: 2/ 1 ,
11.000% ANNUAL
ANNUAL SURPLUS/ CUMULATIVE ANNUAL
LEVY MATURE PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL INCOME (-DEFICIT) SURPLUS LEVY
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (e) (9)
1984 1986. 0 49,088 49,088 52,660• 3,572 26,768 23,196
1985 1987 5,000 34,650 39,650 0 39,650- 10,314 23,196
1986 1988 5,000 34,100 39,100 5,590 33,510- 0 23,196
1987 1989_ 5,000 33,550 38,550 13,990 24,560- 0 24,560
1988 1990 5,000 33,000 38,000 13,990 24,010- 0 24,010
1989 1991 5,000 32,450 37,450 13,990 23,460- 0 23,460
1990 1992 5,000 31,900 36,900 13,990 22,910- 0 22,910
1991 1993 5,000 31,350 36,350 13,990 22,360- 0 22,360
1992 1994 5,000 30,800 35,800 13,990 21,810- 0 21,810
1993 1995 10,000 30,250 40,250 13,990 26,260- 0 26,260
1994 199.6 10,000 29,150 39,150 13,990 25,160- 0 25,160
1995 1997 10,000 28,050 38,050 13,990 24,060- 0 24,060
1996 1998 10,000 26,950 36,950 13,990 22,960- 0 22,960
1997 1999 10,000 25,850 35,850 13,990 21,860- 0 21,860
1998 2000 15,000 24,750 39,750 13,990 25,760- 0 25,760
1999 2001 15,000 23,100 38,100 13,990 24,110- 0 24,110
2000 2002 15,000 21,450 36,450 13,990 22,460- 0 22,460
2001 2003 20,000 19,800 39,800 13,990 25,810- 0 25,810
2002 2004 20,000 17,600 37,600 13,990 23,610- 0 23,610
2003 2005 25,000 15,400 40,400 13,990 26,410- 0 26,410
2004, 2006 25,000 12,650 37,650 13,990 23,660- 0 23,660
2005 2007 30,000 9,900 39,900 13,990 25,910- 0 25,910
2006 2008 30,000 6,600 36,600 13,990 22,610- 0 22,610
2007 2009 30,000 3,300 33,300 13,990 19,310- 0 19,310
TOTALS: $315,000 $605,688 $920,688 $352,040 $568,648- $568,648
BOND YEARS: 5,506 ANNUAL INTEREST COST: $605,688 •INCLUDES CAPITALIZED
AVERAGE MATURITY: 17.48 DISCOUNT (PREMIUM) : $0 INTEREST OF $52,660
AVG. ANNUAL RATE: 11.000% TOTAL INTEREST COST: $605,688
F
r
n