Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 05232000 Meeting Sheet IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII 100566 Box: 17 Folder: CC PACKETS 1999-2001 Document: CC PACKET 05232000 'n thorn HE a C% CITY OF ST. ANTHONY CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING AGENDA May 23, 2000 6:00 pm - 7:30 pm City Hall SANDWICHES PROVIDED AT 6:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER BY MAYOR CAVANAUGH. II. JOINT ISSUES AND CONCERNS. • A. Central Park Project - funding and disruption of Park for the next two years. B. Silver Point Park - dedication June 1' C. Town Meeting on public safety and miscellaneous updates - May 30". D. Salvation Army property. E. Apache Plaza,update - new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District. F. City public improvements update --33rd Avenue NE; 29`h Avenue NE; and, Silver.Lake Road/37th Avenue NE. M. OPEN FORUM FOR QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FROM SCHOOL BOARD TO COUNCIL AND FROM COUNCIL TO SCHOOL BOARD. IV. ADJOURNMENT. a `. • al �'10 llla a(✓ TOWN MEETING/OPEN HOUSE May 30, 2000 6:30 pm GREAT HALL 6:30 - 7:00 PM Open for booths • COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 PM Mayor Introduce staff, City Council, Planning and Parks Commissions in attendance Give an overview of City happenings Crime Crime prevention programs Prevention Short speech on National Night Out Officer 7:30 to 8:00 PM Questions/Answers Bulk of time allotted for citizens to ask questions, and receive information from all Departments in the City GREAT HALL • 8:00 to.8:30 PM Open for booths • MEMORANDUM DATE: 5/4/00 TO: City Manager Mornson FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom RE: UPDATE OF THE CRITICAL PATH FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ORDINANCE/PROCESS AND HILLCREST DEVELOPMENT'S REDEVELOPMENT OF APACHE PLAZA PROPERTY To date the"Critical Path"is amended as follows: Critical Path/Important Dates Target Complete Task 4/18/00 4/18/00 Planning Commission meeting. Commission approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Commission to ask Hillcrest to withdraw their request for zoning map change and zoning code amendment. 4/25/00 4/25/00 City Council meeting. Council to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. 4/27/00 4/26/00 Planning Consultant. Consultant to submit "Application for Comprehensive Plan • Amendment"to Metropolitan Council. Planning Consultant to facilitate the approval of said amendment. 5/2/00 5/2/00 Planning Commission work session- Commission to hold work session with Planning Consultant,staff,and Hillcrest to discuss the draft PUD ordinance and process. 5/9/00 ---- Planning Consultant. Consultant to submit final PUD ordinance and related forms, applications,etc.to staff. Said ordinance and related documents shall be"approved as to form"by City Attorney Soth. Additionally,Consultant to work with Hillcrest to prepare them for the PUD process. 5/15/00 ---- City Council work session. Council to hold work session with Planning Commission Representative,Planning Consultant,staff and Hillcrest to discuss PUD ordinance and process. 5/16/00 ---- Planning Commission meeting. Commission to hear PUD ordinance. Commission, Consultant,and staff to hold/hear Hillcrest Development's"Application Conference" and"Sketch Plan." 5/23/00 ---- City Council meeting. City Council to hear the PUD ordinance(one reading). 6/6/00 ---- Planning Commission work session. Commission to hold work session with Planning Consultant,staff,and Hillcrest. • • — 2 6/20/00 ---- Planning Commission meeting. Commission to hear"Preliminary Development Plan" (PUD/site specific)and make recommendations for approval or denial of said plan. Commission to hear "Final Development Plan" for the Apache Plaza (building specific). Commission also to hear plan for Tax Increment Financing(TIF). 6/27/00 ---- City Council meeting. Council to hear Preliminary Development Plan (PUD/site specific) and Final Development Plan (building specific). Council to direct staff/Consultant to prepare findings of fact consistent with approval/denial and to return with a final PUD agreement. 7/11/00 ---- City Council meeting. Council to approve findings of fact and PUD agreement. John Shardlow is the point of contact for this project and is working with City Attorney Soth,Hillcrest,and staff to meet all target dates. It should be noted that the"Critical Path/Important Dates"may change depending on the outcomes of the Council and Commission meetings. The above has been reviewed by the City Attorney Soth and Planning Consultant Shardlow. Note: Hillcrest seeks the assistance of staff in identifying alternative funding sources for this project. Staff views this as a separate process and does not intend to include funding in this Critical Path. Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin Planning Consultant Shardlow City Attorney Soth • • MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers Spencer Isom, Assistant City Manager FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager ITEM: CRITICAL PATH/IMPORTANT DATES FOR APACHE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING - UPDATE Target Complete Task 4/27/00 4/27/00 City Manager meets with Jerry Gilligan, Dorsey & Whitney, and Bob Thistle, Springsted, Inc., to review tax increment financing (TIF) request from Hillcrest Development. 5/2/00 5/2/00 City Manager, Gilligan, Thistle meet with development team to discuss TIF request with Hillcrest. 5115100 5115100 Work session with City Council. 5/17/00 Letter sent to Ramsey County on TIF plan. 6/13/00 City Council/Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) calls for a public hearing on new TIF District and decertify old TIF District. Review business terms with Hillcrest. 6/14/00 City notifies School Board and County Boards about new TIF District. 7/12/00 Notice of 7/25 hearing faxed to St. Anthony Bulletin. 7/12/00 Notice of 7/25 hearing published in Bulletin. 6/20/00 Planning Commission reviews TIF plan and makes recommendation to Council. 6/27/00 Public hearin g P to adopt business subsidy policy. • 7/25/00 - Three public hearings by Council: (1) new TIF District (2) decertify parcels from existing District (3) specific business subsidy agreement with Hillcrest 8/8/00 Approve developers agreement and business subsidy agreements with Hillcrest CITY OF ST. ANTHONY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA May 23, 2000 (Immediately following Joint Meeting with School Board) 7:30 PM Council Chambers PAGE(S) I. CALL TO ORDER. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. III. ROLL CALL. IV. APPROVAL OF MAY 23, 2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS - None. VI. COMMUNITY FORUM. Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. VII. CONSENT AGENDA. ........................................................................ 1 - 29 These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests,'in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None. IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL ................................ 30 - 48 A. Todd Hubmer, WSB, Inc., will be present for the following • items: City Council Regular Meeting Agenda May 23, 2000 • Page 2 PA- GE(S) 1 . Resolution 00-029, re: Award construction bid for 29th Avenue NE street improvements ..................... 30 - 34 2. Resolution 00-047, re: Approve change order relating to sidewalk, lighting, and landscape improvements for 29th Avenue NE ......................... 35 - 37 3. Resolution 00-046, re: Adopt amendment to policy on decorative lighting on MSA designated streets ........ 38 - 42 4. Resolution 00-045, re: Accept feasibility study and authorize plans and specifications for the Harding Lift station project (see feasibility study in folder) ............... 43 B. Resolution 00-042, re: Call for sale of General Obligation State Aid Street bonds (see Springsted _recommendations in folder) ............................................... 44 • C. Resolution 00-043, re: Call for sale of General Obligation g on Storm Sewer revenue bonds (see Springsted recommendations in folder) .............................................. 45 D. Ordinance 2000-002, re: Obtaining criminal history data on prospective City employees (2"d reading) ................ 46 - 48 X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF ................................ 49 -- 74 A. Planning Commission meeting - May 16, 2000 ............ 49 - 60 1 . Ordinance 2000-006, re: Amendment to the Ordinance relating to Planned Unit Development (1St reading) ... 61 - 73 B. City Manager .................................................................. 74 XI. REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS. XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. • XIII. ADJOURNMENT. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS ATTACHED. s VIII. CONSENT AGENDA. • Approval of Regular Council Meeting Minutes-May 9, 2000 • Licenses and Permits • Claims • Resolution 00-034 (Tort Liability Limits) • Approval.of LMCIT Insurance Renewal • • Resolution 00-039 (Dissolution of MPRS) • Resolution 00-040'(Second Amendment to Ramsey County HRA Joint Agreement) • Resolution 00-044 (Final Audit Transfers) • 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ® 2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 3 MAY 9, 2000 4 I. CALL TO ORDER. 5 Mayor Cavanaugh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 6 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 7 Mayor Cavanaugh invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 8 III. ROLL CALL. 9 Councilmembers present: Mayor Cavanaugh; Councilmembers Sparks, Thuesen, Horst and 10 Hodson 11 Councilmembers absent: None 12 Also present: City Manager Michael Mornson; City Attorney William Soth. 13 IV. APPROVAL OF MAY 9, 2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. 14 Motion by Thuesen to approve the May 9, 2000 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda as pre- . 15 sented. 16 Motion carried unanimously. 017 V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS. 18 Mayor Cavanaugh introduced Scott Tankenoff, Managing Partner of Hillcrest Development, and 19 invited him to approach the Council. Mr. Tankenoff stated that he wished to update the Council 20 on the progress of the redevelopment of Apache Plaza. But first, he distributed a recent article 21 that had appeared in City Pages which he felt provided excellent reasons for the turnaround of 22 Apache Plaza. 23 Furthermore, Mr. Tankenoff related that-the purchase of Apache Plaza was progressing well and 24 he continues to be encouraged with ongoing meetings with City Staff and consultants. 25 Horst inquired about the status of the Herbergers lease. Mr. Tankenoff stated that Herbergers has 26 been approached and Hillcrest continues to work with the retailer on options. 27 Cavanaugh thanked Mr. Tankenoff for his presentation. 28 Mayor Cavanaugh introduced Sister Rosalind Gefre and invited her to address the Council. 29 Sister Rosalind stated that she would like to express interest in the Salvation Army property on 30 behalf of her Professional Massage Clinics and Schools of Professional Massage. Sister 31 Rosalind explained that her school has become too small to accommodate the number of students 32 enrolled and she would like to move the school to the Salvation Army property. Furthermore, 33 Sister Rosalind stated that the property would remain in much the same manner, with retreats 1034 . continuing and eventually she would like to consider a clinic. This clinic would consist of a City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 9, 2000 • Page 2 1 massage facility, chiropractor, and wellness clinic. Sister Rosalind expressed her sincere 2 appreciation for the opportunity to speak with the Council. 3 Mayor Cavanaugh thanked Sister Rosalind for her appearance and stated that the Council was 4 looking.forward to learning more about the progress of the Salvation Army property. 5 VI. COMMUNITY FORUM. 6 None. 7 VII. CONSENT AGENDA. 8 Motion by Sparks to approve the Consent Agenda for the May 9, 2000 City Council meeting, 9 with the following change: 10 B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of April 25, 2000: 11 Change references from "Mr."Hanson to "Dr."Hanson. 12 The balance of the Consent Agenda was approved as presented, which included: 13 A. Board of Review Minutes of April 25, 2000; 14 C. Licenses (The Snelling Company, St. Paul, MN (Heating Contractors License);Cedar 15 Valley Heating & Air(Heating Contractors License); Minneapolis Department of Parks 16 and Recreation/Gross Golf Course (3.2 Beer Permit- Renewal)); 17 D. Four pages of Verified Claims. 18 Motion carried unanimously. 19 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 20 None. 21 IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. 22 A. Resolution 00-035,re: Fire Training Contract. 23 Cavanaugh invited City Manager Michael Momson to review the issue of the fire training con- 24 tract. Momson offered that the Minneapolis Fire Department is offering to neighbor departments 25 use of their training campus. The campus includes classrooms, a six-story tower, and a propane- 26 fueled dwelling fire simulator. The campus is located on the waterworks property in Fridley. 27 Mornson directed the Council's attention to a memorandum from Joel Hewitt dated May 1, 2000, 28 and presented on page 22 of the agenda packets. The memorandum stated that the primary inter- 29 est in the St. Anthony Fire Department in the offered training surrounds the fire simulator. Mr. 30 Hewitt further stated in his memo that it is essential for the City's fire department to have the 31 opportunity with live fire training. • City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 9, 2000 Page 3 1 Thuesen inquired about the cost of the program. Morrison responded that the cost for use of the 2 fire simulator is $450.00 for the first two hours, and $175.00 for each additional hour. Funding 3 for this year would come from the current Fire operating budget, and future funding would be re- 4 quested through the formal budgeting process. 5 Motion by Hodson to approve Resolution 00-035, wherein the City Council of the City of St. 6 Anthony hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute a contract for use of the 7 Minneapolis Fire Department Fire Training Campus to provide the ability to instruct City of St. 8 Anthony personnel in maintaining their firefighting skills and abilities. 9 Motion carried unanimously. 10 B. Resolution 00-036, re: Emergency Vehicle Preemption Systems. 11 Cavanaugh reviewed that the firm of Short Elliott Hendrickson(SEH)had submitted a proposal, 12 at the Council's direction, for the design and construction services related to eight Emergency 13 Vehicle Preemption(EVP) systems within the City of St. Anthony. -Mornson affirmed that the 14 City would be authorizing SEH to perform a feasibility study and the firm would return to the 15 Council with cost estimates. Add_ itionally, Mornson reminded the Council that$65,000 has been 1016 set out within the budget for this project, but that figure might need to.be reviewed. Cavanaugh 17 offered that there is a possibility of sharing the cost with the county. 18 Motion by Horst to approve Resolution 00-036, wherein the City Council of the City of St. 19 Anthony authorizes the engineering firm of SEH to perform design and construction services 20 related to eight EVP Systems within the City of St. Anthony, and pursuant to SEH's letter of 21 April 24, 2000, a copy of which is attached to Resolution 00-036 and made a part thereof. . 22 Motion carried unanimously... .. _ 23 C. Resolution 00-037, re: Future State Aid Street Allocation. 24 Motion by Horst to approve Resolution 00-037, wherein the Commissioner of Transportation be 25 and is hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid 26 Street Projects of the City of St. Anthony in an amount up to $500,000 in accordance with 27 Minnesota Rules 8820.1500, Subparagraph 9, and to authorize repayments from the following 28 year's accruals to the Construction Account of the Municipal State Aid Street fund for said City. 29 Motion carried unanimously. 30 D. Resolution 00-038 re: Use of Local Funds until MSAS funds become available. 31 Motion by Horst to approve Resolution 00-038,wherein the Commissioner of Transportation be 1832 and is hereby requested to approve this basic financing for said construction projects and to 33 authorize repayments from the subsequent accruals to the Construction Account of Municipal City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 9, 2000 • Page 4 1 State Aid Street fund for said City within the limitations provided by law at the times and in the 2 amounts as herein indicated: 3 On or after February 1, 2001 - $183,000 from 2001 Allotment 4 On or after February 1, 2002 - $113,000 from 2002 Allotment 5 On or after February 1, 2003 - $113,000 from 2003 Allotment 6 On or after February 1, 2004 - $113,000 from 2004 Allotment 7 On or after February 1, 2005 - $113,000 from 2005 Allotment 8 On or after February 1, 2006 - $ 3 8,100 from 2006 Allotment 9 Motion carried unanimously. l0 E. Ordinance 2000-002, re: Obtaining background/criminal history data for possible city I1 employment(lst reading). 12 Cavanaugh asked City Manager Michael Morrison to provide background information for Ordi- 13 nance 2000-002. Morrison explained that the proposed ordinance would enable the City 14 Manager to obtain criminal history data contained in the Minnesota Criminal Justice Information 15 System of the finalists for City positions. It would enable the City Manager, upon obtaining an 16 authorized consent form, to research criminal history data on a person. Morrison clarified that •17 the intent of the ordinance is for City employees. 18 Motion by Thuesen to approve the First Reading of Ordinance 2000-002, an ordinance relating to . 19 obtaining criminal history data, amending section 300.04 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordi- 20 nances, with a change to the last sentence to state: 21 "The City Manager or designee must obtain the consent of the finalists before requesting the.data, but an applicant's failure,to provide-consent will [instead of"may."] disqualify..... 23 the applicant from the prospective position. 24 Motion carried unanimously. 25 F. Ordinance 2000-003, re: Lot Coverage_(Ist readin�l. 26 Cavanaugh noted that the issue of a Lot Coverage Ordinance Amendment needed to be returned 27 to the Planning Commission for official approval. After that approval, the Council would be in a 28 position to vote on the First Reading of the Ordinance. The other Councilmembers were in 29 agreement. It was decided to return the Lot Coverage Amendment to the Planning Commission 30 for approval. 31 Mayor Cavanaugh directed City Manager Michael Momson to return the Lot Coverage Amend- 32 ment to the Planning Commission for approval. Cavanaugh wished to note that the Amendment •33 is the result of thorough and detailed research performed by the Planning Commissioners and is 34 an excellent project of which the Council supports. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 9, 2000 • Page 5 1 X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF. 2 A. Review Salvation Army Moratorium with City Attorney. 3 City Manager Michael Mornson provided background information on this issue by stating that on 4 May 11, 1999, the City Council adopted a moratorium on the Salvation Army property. The 5 moratorium was for a 12-month period to May 11, 2000. 6 In addition, the City Attorney has presented the Mayor and Council with a letter dated April 19, 7 2000 which outlines the options for the Council. The options are to extend the moratorium up to 8 a period of eighteen months to conduct further studies of possible impacts on development. The 9 second option is to let the moratorium expire,which would mean the existing zoning and 10 Comprehensive Plan would remain in effect(Recreation and Open Space District). 1 l Mornson further stated that at the time the moratorium was put into place, communication re- 12 garding details of the property was poor. Since that.time, communication has improved and City 13 Staff has been in the process of organizing a meeting with the Salvation Army to discuss the 14 Comprehensive-Plan and other issues the City has concerns over. For example,potential buyers 15 of the property, and the impact on the surrounding schools and the county. Morrison offered that 16 two-representatives of the Salvation Army would have been in attendance at this meeting but 17 both were out of town. 18 Mornson continued by expressing his recommendation that the moratorium be extended until 19 June 14, 2000 at a minimum because it gives the Council additional time to review other options. 20 Cavanaugh offered that the Council worksession scheduled for May 15, 2000 would provide an 21 opportunity for the Council to obtain additional information about a possible Planned Unit 22 Development("PUD") option and the impact of such an option. 23 Mornson offered that he had spoken with a contact person at the Salvation Army, who repre- 24 sented that the Salvation Army was in agreement with a moratorium extension until the next 25 Council meeting in June 2000. The representatives of the Salvation Army would be able to -26 attend that meeting and provide information and representation of the Salvation Army property 27 issue. 28 It was determined that the Planning Commission would review the issue at its next meeting (May 29 16, 2000) and a public hearing would be held at a City Council meeting in June. Additionally, 30 the first two readings would be requested to be waived. 31 Thuesen offered some thoughts that were presented from the previous Council when the morato- 32 rium was initially passed. He stated there was a sense for potential of redevelopment of the Sal- 33 vation Army property and it was visioned that the City would be left behind, so to speak, in the •34 planning. The City had limited ability in this process and thus the moratorium was instituted to City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 9, 2000_ • Page 6 1 give the City a chance to study the situation. In essence,Thuesen supports the June 14, 2000 2 moratorium extension, but would like to move ahead with decisions relating to the property. 3 Momson noted for the Council that a public hearing must be held in connection with this issue 4 and a notice in the local paper would be published. 5 Motion by Thuesen to approve Ordinance 2000-005, an Ordinance Relating to the Moratorium 6 on Property Known as the Salvation Army Camp Property; Amending Section 1330.04, Subd. 1, 7 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances, wherein until June 14, 2000,the City Council, 8 Planning Commission, Building Official, Board of Adjustments and Appeals, and City Staff of 9 the City of St. Anthony shall not grant any permits or rezoning or other authorization for changes 10 in use, or accept any applications or requests for changes in the use, for the property in the City 11 known as the Salvation Army Camp property, or for the construction of any building, or addition 12 to or alteration of any building, on said property, except as provided in Subd. 2 of this Section. 13 Additionally,the first and second readings are waived. 14 Motion carried unanimously. 015 16 B. City Manager. 17 City Manager Michael Mornson directed the Council's attention to page 60 of the agenda packets 18 which provided an agenda of a Town Meeting/Open House Concept for May 30, 2000. Mornson 19 provided background information by stating that last year, the City held three neighborhood 20 meetings, one on crime watch, another on the Y2K issue, and the last on the new crime notifica- 21 tion law. In all, 190 residents come for the three meetings. 22 Momson continued by stating that the Police Department would be holding a"community out- 23 reach program"where they travel to the neighborhoods to talk about crime watch. The City 24 Council has been asked to participate and possibly the Park and Planning Chairs; and City Staff 25 as well. The bulk of time.would be allocated to questions and answers, and May 30, 2000 is the 26 date that has been chosen. 27 On another issue, Momson reported that the City Council had hired the planning firm of DSU to 28 assist with the redevelopment of Apache Plaza. In the minutes, $3,000.00 was authorized by the 29 Council for any City activities that the planner assists with that are city related. Mornson wished 30 to clarify for the Council that a charge of$7,650 has been incurred in relation to the assistance of 31 the planner; however,this charge would be covered under a reimbursement agreement with Hill- 32 crest Development and would not be out-of-pocket for the City. •33 Mornson stated that requests have been received for a review of the curfew ordinance. Appar- 34 ently the City has outdated material and Hennepin County has adopted a county-wide police City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 9, 2000 0 Page 7 1 ordinance and is encouraging others to do the same. This issue will be presented at the June 2 meeting. 3 Morrison reported that Clean-Up Day was a success and the City was able to recover costs 4 through a nominal fee as well as applying for grants through the county. 5 Morrison noted that the next two months of City Council meetings will have many detailed 6 issues on the agenda, and it would be critical for all the Councilmembers to be in attendance. If 7 an absence is expected, Morrison encouraged the Councilmembers to alert him in advance of the 8 meeting. 9 Morrison reminded the Council of the worksession scheduled for Monday, May 15, 2000, as well 10 as a joint meeting with the School Board from 6:00 p.m. - 7:30 p.m., May 23, 2000. The regular 11 City Council meeting would occur following the meeting with the School Board. 12 XI. REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS. 13 Hodson did not present a report. 14 Horst reported that he had been contacted by a resident inquiring about parking on both sides of •15 the street. Apparently this has become an issue during soccer games and both sides of the street 16 are lined with cars. 17 Cavanaugh directed City Manager Michael Morrison to inquire with Public Safety regarding 18 parking on both sides of a street. 19 Thuesen reported that he had attended a seminar entitled"Beyond Basics"which concerned 20 -- landuse issues. He.recommended the seminar, particular to-Councilmembers who had not been a - 21 member of the Planning Commission prior to becoming a Councilmember. 22 Sparks reported that the next VillageFest meeting would be Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 6:30 p.m. 23 at the Community Center. She provided an update that a pigroast would be this year at 24 VillageFest, and a number of student groups would be scheduling activities. Some of those ac- 25 tivities would include: NHS is organizing a volleyball tournament;some students are scheduling 26 a powderpuff football game; SADD plans to organize a bonfire after the fireworks; and the Key 27 Club plans on a wiffleball tournament. 28 Additionally, Sparks reported that she attended a meeting with Staff of the Middle Mississippi 29 Watershed Management Organization, who is waiting for the legislature to finish up on pending 30 legislation. •31 Furthermore, Sparks reported that she attended a meeting with the League of Minnesota Cities 32 regarding improving community life wherein a symposium on affordable housing was presented. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 9, 2000 • Page 8 1 Recently a piece was completed on"City Hall, a place where government is close to home"bro- 2 chure which is designed for 5th and 6th graders to obtain information on city government. She 3 felt this brochure would be an excellent learning tool when Councilmembers speak to students 4 and the brochures could be available at City Hall as well. 5 Sparks reported that ACTION (Adults and Children Together in Our Neighborhood) would be 6 accepting grant requests from St. Anthony organizations and groups to sponsor intergenerational 7 events. Please call Amy at 788-7946 if interested. 8 Cavanaugh reported his appreciation for the Staff in organizing the Volunteer Dinner. The 9 dinner was a success and the feedback from residents was positive. He noted the many hours and 10 extra effort that City Staff put forward in organizing the dinner. 11 Additionally, Cavanaugh felt that the Clean-Up Day was a success and again wished to thank 12 City Staff for the excellent organization of the event. He encouraged the City to think of ways 13 that additional clean-up could be accomplished throughout the neighborhoods. 14 Cavanaugh stated that he had received calls about the water quality issue as it related to the rede- 5 velopment of Apache Plaza. Cavanaugh stated that he is working with City Manager Michael •1 i 6 Mornson and felt that the direction would be a final solution for the drainage issue with Apache. 17 Hodson commented that he had spoken to someone at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 18 who suggested that the Council consider a 15-20 year plan and this possibility could be a topic 19 for the May 15 Council worksession. He felt this issue deserved a long-term review as it would 20 be in the City's best interest. __21 . XII. INFORMATION.AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 22 None. 23 XIII. ADJOURNMENT. 24 Motion by Horst to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 p.m. 25 Motion carried unanimously. 26 Respectfully submitted, 27 Sue Selseth 28 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 29 30 Mayor •31 ATTEST: 32 City Clerk Saint Anthony Village DATE: May 23, 2000 Approval. TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval: General Contractors License: Land Recycling Service, Inc., Bloomington, MN Multiple Dwelling License: Plaza Apartments / 3820 Macalaster Drive / Sandberg Family Partnership, LLP Chandler Place / 3701 Chandler Drive / Sage Company Equinox Apartments / 2808 Silver Lane / Sentinel Management, LLC D & J Properties / 3721 Chandler Drive / D & J Properties, LLC Apache Manor / 3817 Macalaster Drive / Halverson & Blaisen Group, LTD • 1® BiRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAC 5/-17/200 - _ , �L�4OR-VO6.00-PAGE -= - i CHECK# DATE AMOUNT BANK VENDOR -- FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING 0 1-50-0f-,t2'4 35 9 008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 11851 05/24/00 454.00 000115 AMES PHOTO FINISH 11852 05/24/00 22.55 0001-ASPEN-ENV-I-RONME-NTAL 9.1 C - 11854 05/24/00 7.49 005136 BRISKIITIM -- .00001 CAMPION ROSE BURNS 11855 05/24/00 1 ,350.00 008652OARTF�ID�iF_-CARE 8�6�5�`'c `+/OC) :1 .00002 CITY OF NEW HOPE 11857 05/24/00 39.30 -- 008099 CITY OF SHOREVIF_W 11858 05/24/00 10,000.00 OCr 4J1o7--OOMF-TON-`S-OOMMEfte-IAL-C 987.-36- - 000815 COTRONEO/DOMINIC 11860 05/24/00 233.30 005234 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT 11861 05/24/00 29.29 f3O8t80--DANKD-Ei IE-RG-ENO'!-ME 57`�47OC22:3f� 008629 DECOUX/HEIDI 11863 05/24/00 88.76 008429 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF 11864 05/24/00 510.00 . .00009 DEPT-OF-PttBCI-C--SAFET 65-0 24/-0 225:00 - - 000807 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 11866 05/24/00 494 .88 004110 DICKSON ELECTRIC 11867 05/24/00 303.00 IrI-SC-0UN-T--S f'EEt:-;IN t-Y86-B-05 2 4/OtY- -9 01 - 001411 DON HARSTAD CO. , INC . 11869 05/24/00 570. 13 � 000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY 11870 05/2.4/00 375.00 -00863-4 DRIVER tlEHfeCE-SERVIOE 1�87t15/ f0 7=00 - 008221 FOSTER,WENTZELL,HEDBACK, 11872 05/24/00 3,000.00 008647 FRATTALLONE 'S HARDWARE 11873 05/24/00 35.38 -- -001025 G-&--K-SFRV-ICES 1--8-7-4--Q5 2tr/f1C) -67 9 -- 001030 G & K SERVICES 11875 05/24/00 242. 17 -- 001145 GL_ENWOOD INGLEWOOD 11876 05/24/00 52.01 ..:-- ---001-1-80-- GOOD-IN-00M PAN )5-24-00 -35-20- 001200 GOPHER BEARING 11878 05/24/00 97 .24 - 001230 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 11879 05/24/00 56.00 -- 001-2-50 -GRPrINGER-INC-/W- 11880-05-/24-fQ 8''1 9 -- 000685 HARDWARE HANK 11881 05/24/00 8.50 -- 001410 HARMON GLASS 11882 05/?_4/00 64 .27 00-14:20---HAW K-1-NS--V)A-TER--FREA-TMEI\T 1-IBB3-fl5-/-2-4-/-0 E�2.93 001505 HENN CO SHERIFF 11884 05/24/00 585.60 - 008376 HENNEPIN CNTY SHERIFF 'S 11885 05/24/00 26.47 00825 -HOME-DEPO-T-GE-GF 11081:-65fE4fOE �c� 33 - 008645 ISOM/SPENSOR A. 11887 .05/24/00 26.78 007358 J . R. 'S APPLIANCE DISPOSA 11888 05/24/00 496.00 :-00-73 1-0 fM-HASH-SA 1889-E}5f24 fQ 1 B-28 - 008434 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI 11890 05/24/00 295.00 002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 11891 05/24/00 32.99 3ERKtE'�'-R-iS-K-S _._.. .. _ i 199 ,5r7A-2 4f00 83- 007321 LOWELL'S AUTOMOTIVE 11893 05/24/00 29.62 008255 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC 11894 05/2.4/00 25.50 002-130-- -MAM. _ 6-5 a ,�0 16 0 -- 008197 MCI WORLDCOM 11896 05/24/00 104.03 008269 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC 11897 05/24/00 49.95 J I 11 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILL.A! GtStOR�VOb-00-PAGE HANK VENDOR CHECK## DATE AMOUNT FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING 008+-56 MN--DE-PAR-TMFN-f--OFtE-ALf 4-6.00 008282 NETL.INK INTERNATIONAL 11899 05/24/00 735.00 008654 NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY 11900 05/24/00 149. 10 002680--I\I©R-THERN-ST�TE.S-POWE -Y901 Ci5-tZ4-tOO 1-tT320-;-4-E--- -- 007317 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUP 11902 05/24/00 126.52 11903 05/24/00 93.30 000045 OFFICE DEPOT 008277 OFFI-C-F_-1"tA-X--C-RE--D-17T-PLAN 404-05- 4-tG 46-0.02- - 008527 OL.SEN FIRE INSPECTION, I 11905 05/24/00 235.00 005123 OLSON/JAY 11906 05/24/00 15.89 - 008528 PAGE-ANACI-T-I-C-AL--SERV-IOE i-Y90 -057 4 48.00 _ 008631 PARTS PLUS ROSEVILLE 11908 05/24/00 28.25 008594 PETERBILT NORTH 11909 05/24/00 13.51 ,,' 002880 -P-TNE-Y-BOWESSIN 132 . - .00003 POST BOARD 11911 05/24/00 540.00 002380 RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASC 11912 05/24/00 4,885.60 .0000-4 R0DE-R/-SHE-R- 1 i9t3-05724f0 5O-.010- 008653 ROSEVILLE FIRE_ GROUND 11914 05/24/00 195.00 003350 SEH/RCM 11915 05/24/00 14,891 .25 - 003355 S-1EVER-LAFfE-C-t_-lN-IC 1-19-16-05-/-24-/-OE D8-.00- - - 008483 SKB 11917 05/24/00 76.50 _005285 SROGA 'S 11918 05/24/00 61 .77 00-1-81-0 ST-A1\ITHONY-VILLAGE--K-FW 11-91-9-05-/94-tG 25.00- 008502 SUPERIOR FORD INC . 11920 05/24/00 20,680.00 007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 11921 05/24/00 235.51. -- --003560 T-RAC-Y-PRTN'Fl-NG .55 004481 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY 11923 05/24/00 97.55 -_ 008372 U S WEST INTERACT SERVIC 11924 05/24/00 65.00 - --002700 US-WES-T---OOMMUNI-C-AT-10NS 1-1-925-05/--24/-00 1;84-5-75 005298 WARNING LITES OF MN 11926 05/24/00 272.92 - FIRSTAR-ST-ANTH&\FY- HE0K-IN -1�7;748:43- �i ,i I 12 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAI - ---0571E�/2000 12 C�'�eck: Register C7_L540R-V06.00 PAGE 04ANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT - 004225 ALLIANT.FD�]I]SE=FfV�C 168--9 65/24700 1 - 004014 ALLIED PAPER CO. 16850 05/24/00 35.50 004293 BELLBOY CORP. 16851 05/24/00 2,622.48 - - ------'00-4042 BUREAU C]F ATF ibBSZ 250.00--- 004087 CITY PAGES 16853 05/24/00 234.00.. 004107 COMPTON 'S COMMERCIAL CLN 16854 05/24/00 2,445.95 --0041-1--1-----DATA -TEL COMMUNIC-PTION— 16855 051?4/OC)- 7C .00 008437 DIREC:TV 16856 05/24/00 34.95 004120 EAGLE WINE CO 16857 05/24/00 2,611 .32 - ---- -"0041-35------ELECTF20-41ATCHMAIV-IhIC -----16858 05/24700-- - -- 239.63 --- 008563 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASS . 16859 05/24/0[) 85.00 004142 FOCUS NEVIS 16860 05/24/00 397.95 ------------00414'1 FR-ITZ CDMPANY INC . 16861 057-2_4TQC)- -x+,680.-52 -- 004157 GETTMAN HOWIE, INC . 16862 05/24/00 151 . 10 004160 GIRARD 'S BUSINESS MACH 16863 05/24/00 15.20 -200.00- 004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC; 16865 05/24/00 14,091 .28 004201 HE:GGIES PIZZA 16866 05/24/00 129.00 0086'17­ HINNENKAMP/WAYNE-----.- -- 161367-0572.470[) -- - - - ------63.50- 004220 JOHNSON .BROS. L.IQ. 16868 05/24/00 30, 162.09 • 004229 . LARSON/MICHAEL 16869 05/24/00 -_-111 .27 - 002040- --L:ILL-IE-SUBCIRBAN-NEWSPAPE-- ----16870--0572�VTOFU -- 243-.60--- 004233 LMCIT % BERKLEY RISK SF_ 16871 05/24/0[) 2,633 . 44 008536 MARKETING INCENTIVES 16872 05/24/00 504.00 --- 004269 METRO COMMERCIAL SERVICE 16874 05/24/00 573. 1.2 004272 METZ BAKING CO 16875 05/2-4/00 143.08 004299 - MPL.S 004334 NORTHEASTER 16877 05/24/00 474.30 002680 NORTHERN STATES POWER 16878 05/24/00 2,877.93 004339 - -- NTN -COMMUNICATIONS--INC --- 000045 OFFICE DEPOT 16880 05/24/00 78.21 004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 16881 05/24/00 81 .36 - - ------'-004354-_ PAUSTIS-3—SONS 1 882-05724/[80 i;368.2A---- 004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 16883 05/24/00 6,704.39 004376 PRIOR WINE CO 16884 05%24/00 3,045.51 - ----004385--QUALITY—WINE-CO 008597 R.D. HANSON ASSOC . , INC . 16886 05/24/00 197.90 002380 RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASC . 16887 05/24/00 1 , 136.82 - --004393----RON 'S--ICE 16888-0572-4700- --1-00 59-- 004466 SYSCO-MINNESOTA 16889 05/24/00 1 ,494.56 .00002 TOWNSEND PRICING, INC . 16890 05/24/00 79.93 "-"------004475---T R I—TECH—D-I S PENSIIV 1689 X0512.4/00 55.-91 004480 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE 16892 05/24/00 111.72 004492 U •S WEST COMMUNICATIONS 16893 05/24/00 723.67 —"008219----"US'-WEST—DE 16894 05724 00 --i 60-9CF LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 96,856. 18 # 13 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 2, 2000 MEETING DATE: May 9, 2000 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Michael Morrison, City Manager ITEM: TORT LIABILITY LIMITS The Minnesota Statutory municipal limits changed on January 1, 2000 from $300,000 per claimant/$750,000 occurrence to $300,000 per person/$1,000,000 per occurrence. A resolution is needed to waive the Statutory limits up to the limits of the City's policies through the LMCIT Insurance Trust insurance program for 2000. Staff recommendation: Approval of Resolution 00-034 15 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY RESOLUTION 00-034 A RESOLUTION REGARDING WAIVER ON TORT LIABILITY LIMITS FOR LMCIT INSURANCE PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony approved participation in the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) insurance program for the year 2000; and WHEREAS, the City has elected to purchase umbrella liability coverage in the amount of $1,000,000, which is in excess of the statutory limits on tort liability as set forth in MN Statutes 466.04. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves the waiving of the monetary limits on tort liability established by MN Statutes . • 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the-excess liability coverage.obtained from.LMCIT for the policy period from June 1, 2000 to May 31, 2002. Adopted this day of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed by Administration: City Manager • 16 MEMORANDUM. DATE: May 15, 2000 TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director ITEM: LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE RENEWAL Mr. Carl Bennetsen will be present at the May 23, 2000, Council Meeting to discuss, answer questions and finalize insurance coverage for June 1, 2000 - May 31, 2001. The attached information includes price quotations for property, auto, general liability, and workers' compensation. The cost for maintaining our present coverage of $10,000 deductible and $50,000 aggregate through the League of Minnesota Cities totals $143,819. • This amount represents an increase.in premiums of$8,947,which is primarily due to increases in automobile and workers' compensation premiums. As in previous years, no other insurance companies chose to compete with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Last years coverage is primarily duplicated, however, the League made enhancements to the policy, which Mr. Bennetsen is prepared to review with Council. Workers' compensation costs continue to be a concern for all Minnesota businesses. The increase in the work-comp premium is due to an increase in St. Anthony's experience modification (1.10 to 1.28) which is directly related to workers compensation claims. To help rehabilitate employees in a timely manner, St. Anthony adopted a Managed Care Plan where employees who are injured on the job are assigned to a specific clinic for rehabilitation of their injury. This results in a 5% reduction in workers' comp premiums and assists the employee with developing a medical plan and treatment schedule. Also, because Y2K was basically a non-event, the League of Minnesota Cities has waived the premiums for Y2K this year, however, the insurance coverage remains in effect. • 17 Dram Shop/Liquor Liability Three company's bid on the liquor liability coverage. (Christopher Skelton from Sunrise Park Insurance Agency will. be present to answer questions). This proved to beneficial because .it. creates a competitive bidding environment between vendors. The cost for coverage from these carriers varied in price, as did the coverage offered. United National Insurance Company was the low bidder and provided the best coverage. United's quote included coverage for legal defense costs that are outside the liability limits of the $1,000,000. The other quotes were higher and had legal costs as part of the $1,000,000 liability coverage. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the following municipal & liquor insurance coverage totaling $164,124 for the upcoming year (Includes $10,000 Deductible Per Occurrence/$50,000 Aggregate): 1) Council approve the League of Minnesota Cities insurance proposal for the following: • A. Property $ 7,389 B. Wand Marine $ 2,006 C. Boiler/Machinery $ 1,585 D. Blanket Bond/Fidelity $ 742 E. Automobile $17,858 F. General Liability $38,844 G. Open Meeting Law $ 823 H. Volunteers Accident Plan $ 1,121 2) Council approve workers' compensation coverage totaling $73,451 which includes an Employee Managed Care Plan. 3) Council approve United National Insurance Company as the City's On-Sale/Off-Sale liquor liability carrier at a cost of$20,305. Insurance Renewal: Increase 1999/00 2000/01 (Decrease) Property $ 59994 $ 79389 $ 19395 . Inland Marine $ 19621 $ 29006 $ 385 Boiler/Machinery $ 19519 $ 19585 $ 66 Fidelity $ 790 $ 742 ($ -48) Automobile $ 16,011 $ 179858 $ 19847 General/Liability $ 449201 $ 389844 ($ 59357) Open Meeting Law $ 983 $ 823 ($ 160) Y2K - Expanded $ 29362 Waived ($ 2,362) Volunteerss $ 773 $ 19121 $ 348 Workers' Comp $ 60.618 73 451 $ 12,833 TOTAL LMCIT $1349872 $1439819 $ 89947 Liquor Liability $ 249214 $ 20,305 ($ 39909) • TOTAL COSTS $1599086 $1649124 $ 5,038 19 Page 1 LIQUOR LIABILITY PROTECTION: • Provided by: UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY This policy will provide coverage and pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of liability to .which this insurance applies, if such liability is imposed under the Minnesota Statutes of 19852 Section 340A.801 (MN. Liquor Liability Law) and all laws amendatory thereof, for actions occurring at the insured premises that are not specifically excluded. COVERAGE LIMITS: 50 _ Hy,,,��e�+ S BODILY INJURY-EACH PERSON 1,000,000 BODILY INJURY-EACH OCCURRENCE 1,0002000 PROP. DAMAGE-EACH OCCURRENCE 1,000,000 LOSS OF MEANS OF SUPPORT-EACH ,� o.,��p dE > $0.TT�(� PERSON Fats �� uca 1,000,000 LOSS OF MEANS OF SUPPORT-EACH Z�v�«.�t� s0000c OCCURRENCE � o�►..t 1,000,000 ANNUAL AGGREGATE 1,000,000 PREMIUM BASIS: ON-SALE RATE PER:$100 1.398 ON-SALE LIQUOR RECEIPTS 7752000 OFF-SALE RATE PER$100 .253 OFF-SALE LIQUOR RECEIPTS 1,800,000 PREMIUM BREAKDOWN: PREMIUM $ 15,389.00 SURPLUS LINES TAX 461.67 INSPECTION FEE 225.00 AGENCY POLICY FEE N/A TOTAL ALL PREM UMS $ 16,075.67 In order to bind coverage and issue a certificate of coverage we would need a signed application, copies of servers awareness completion certificates and 35% down payment ($5,626.00). Payment options are available, ask me for details if you are interested. Sincerely, Christopher T. Skelton, CIC 2® Page 2 • LIQUOR LIABILITY PROTECTION: OFFERED BY: UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY This policy will provide coverage and pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall become legally obligated to,pay as damages because of liability to which this insurance applies, if such liability is imposed under the Minnesota Statutes of 19855 Section 340A.801 (MN. Liquor Liability Law) and all laws amendatory thereof, for actions occurring at the insured premises that are not specifically excluded. COVERAGE LIMITS• BODILY INJURY-EACH PERSON 1,000,000 BODILY INJURY-EACH OCCURRENCE 1,000,000 PROP. DAMAGE-EACH OCCURRENCE 1,000,000 LOSS OF MEANS OF SUPPORT-EACH PERSON 1,000,000 LOSS OF MEANS OF SUPPORT-EACH OCCURRENCE 1,000,000 ANNUAL AGGREGATE 1,000,000 • PREMIUM BASIS• OFF-SALE RATE PER$100 .216 OFF-SALE LIQUOR RECEIPTS 1,800,000 PREMIUM BREAKDOWN: PREMIUM $ 3,888.00 SURPLUS LINES TAX 116.64 INSPECTION FEE 125.00 AGENCY POLICY FEE 100.00 TOTAL 12 MONTH PREMIUM $ 4,229.64 In order to bind coverage And issue a certificate of coverage we would need a signed application and 35% down payment ($1,480.00). Payment options are available, ask me for details if you are interested. Sincerely, Christop er T. Skelton, CIC 21 MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM - • Suite 125 • 13911 Ridgedale Drive •. Minnetonka, MN 55305 Phone (612) 593-2666 • Fax (612) 593-2501 May 2, 2000 MEMO TO: City Managers/City Administrators in MPRS Communities FROM: Larry Thompson, Consultant to the MPRS SUBJECT: Proposed Dissolution of the MPRS; Enclosed Assessment for Operating Expenses As was indicated in an earlier memorandum, the MPRS Executive Committee has investigated the steps which are necessary to dissolve the System. At this point all preliminary steps have been taken, and the final step remains members' approval of the dissolution. The Committee recommends that this step now be taken. • Enclosed is a copy of a sample resolution approving dissolution of the MPRS, for consideration by your City Council. If your City Council approves this resolution, a certified copy of it should be sent to Dan Donahue at the City of New Hope. Once resolutions have been received from two-thirds of MPRS members, the System officially will be dissolved. Dan will notify you when this occurs. In lieu of a final audit of the System by an independent audit firm, the Executive Committee has voted to appoint a committee of three municipal Finance Officers to conduct such an audit. Also enclosed is an assessment for MPRS operating expenses. On September 26, 1966 the MPRS Board of Directors voted to cease all recruitment and testing activities by the System, and it discussed how to meet the System's operating expenses between that time and official dissolution of the System. The City of New Hope offered to loan the System funds for this purpose, and the Board of Directors agreed to reimburse New Hope for all such funds. The amount now owed New Hope is $3,000. Please note that your community's assessment for operating expenses is to be made payable to the City of New Hope, and it is to be remitted to the City's Finance Officer. Also, please note that the enclosed materials are being sent to only one person in each member community, so please see that they are properly forwarded. If you have any questions in this matter, feel free to contact either Dan Donahue (763-531-5100) or me (763-404-0515). • 22 • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY RESOLUTION 00-039 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING DISSOLUTION OF THE MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City is a member of a joint powers organization known as the Minnesota Police Recruitment System (MPRS) created by a joint powers agreement (the "Agreement") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59; and WHEREAS, the MPRS no longer serves the purpose for which it was formed, and the MPRS Executive Committee has recommended to MPRS members that the organization be dissolved; and WHEREAS, Section XIV of the Agreement provides that the MPRS shall be dissolved when its Secretary-Treasurer has received certified copies of resolutions adopted by the governing bodies of two-thirds of its members requesting such dissolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that dissolution of the MPRS is in the best interests of the City. • NOW THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony that the City hereby requests dissolution of the Minnesota Police Recruitment System (MFRS) in accordance with the Agreement and that the City Clerk hereby is authorized and directed to transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the MPRS Secretary-Treasurer in care of Daniel Donahue, City Manager, City of New Hope, Minnesota. Adopted this day of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • Reviewed by Administration: City Manager 23 Office of the County Manager Paul L. Kirkwold,County Manager • 250 Court House Tel:651-266 78000 15 West Kellogg Boulevard Fax:651-266-8039 RAMSEY COUNTY St.Paul,MN 55102-1614 e-mail:www.co.ramsey.mn.us April 28, 2000 Michael Morrison, Manager St Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St Anthony, MN 55418 Dear Mr. Morrison: Fifteen years ago, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter referred to as HUD, determined that Ramsey County would be eligible to become an Entitlement Urban County and receive an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) dollars in excess of one million dollars. This money would be used to undertake housing and community development activities primarily benefiting the residents of suburban Ramsey County..In 1992,the Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME)program was also added as a resource for the County. Seventeen suburban communities have chosen to participate in the agreement process over the past fifteen years, thus, ensuring that a guaranteed annual allocation would be earmarked for the County and those suburban-municipalities that desire to actively participate in the program. Recently, HUD has notified us that we remain eligible to continue our participation in this federal program. Our eligibility and the actual dollar amount we receive is based upon the population accumulated through the number of jurisdictions that join with us. Our records show that since 1985 your community has signed cooperation agreements with the County to ensure our eligibility. This year it will be necessary to execute a second amendment to our Joint Cooperation Agreement, due to HUD requirements. A copy of the amendment is attached to this letter. Please have it approved by your City Council or Town Board and return a fully executed copy to us no later than June 2, 2000. The County Attorney's Office has advised us that the first two paragraphs of this amendment are clarifications of existing language in our existing Cooperation Agreements but have been included to satisfy the local HUD office. The third paragraph may be a new requirement for your municipality. It requires that you have adopted certain policies that are clearly set out in the amendment. You may have already adopted one or both of these policies as a condition of some other program or agreement, but if you have not they must be in place by the time the amendment is executed. Minnesota's First Home Rule County printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10%poskonsumer content 24 As has been the case in the past, federal regulations require that we advise you of your opportunity to "opt out" of the County's Entitlement and compete directly with other cities in the State's Small Cities program. We, of course, hope that you will not choose this route, as we feel that the County program is your best opportunity of receiving an allocation for an eligible project. If, however, you do choose to "opt out", please be advised that you may not have an opportunity to participate with us for the next three years. "Opt out" notification must be made to both the County and the local HUD office no'later than June 2,2000. INCLUSION IN THE COUNTY ENTITLEMENT DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT YOU ACTIVELY PARTICPATE IN THE PROGRAM. IT DOES PROVIDE THE COUNTY WITH THE NEEDED POPULATION TO QUALIFY AND'INFLUENCES OUR ANNUAL ALLOCATION. We are pleased with the active participation of a number of our municipalities over the past several years. Our suburban communities, as a group,have set county-wide priorities the past six years for use of CDBG and HOME funds. These priorities have resulted in the creation/retention of over 200 jobs, and over 900 low-income, suburban homeowners receiving rehabilitation funding. The HOME funds, which are utilized exclusively for affordable housing, have resulted in the addition of several large-scale rehabilitation projects, many new rental units, and expanded homeownership opportunities in suburban Ramsey County for families and senior citizens. We would like to see more communities that believe they have an eligible project contact us about the possibility of funding. Should you have any questions, or need assistance, please contact Judy Karon, Director of Community and Economic Development, at 651-266-8006. She will be happy to assist you. Sincerely 4aul Kirkwold County Manager. cc: Commissioner Jan Wiessner • SECOND AMENDMENT TO RAMSEY COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMEMNT • The Joint Cooperation Agreement between the County of Ramsey and ("MUNICIPALITY") commencing August 31, 1991, and the First Amendment to that Agreement,effective July 1, 1997, (collectively "AGREEMENT") is further amended as follows: 1. The effective date of this Second Amendment is July 1,2000. 2. The AGREEMENT is amended by the addition of the following language: A. By executing this AGREEMENT the MUNICIPALITY understands that it: 1 . May not apply for grants from appropriations under the Small Cities or State Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Programs for fiscal years during the period in which it participates in the AUTHORITY's CDBG program; and 2. May participate in a Home Investment Partnership Act(HOME) Program only through the AUTHORITY. Thus, even if the ® AUTHORITY does not receive a HOME formula allocation, the MUNICIPALITY cannot form a HOME consortium with other local governments. B. Both the AUTHORITY and MUNICIPALITY are obliged to take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the AUTHORITY's certification required by section 104(b) of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as-amended; including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Housing Act, section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and other applicable laws. The AUTHORITY is prohibited from funding for activities, in or in support of, any cooperating unit of general local government that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes its actions to comply with its fair housing certification. This provision is required because noncompliance by the MUNICIPALITY may constitute noncompliance by the AUTHORITY which can, in turn, provide cause for funding sanctions or other remedial actions by the Department C. The MUNICIPALITY has adopted and is enforcing: • 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and 1`6 • 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within jurisdictions. 3. Except as expressly modified herein,the AGREEMENT remains in full force and effect. RAMSEY COUNTY-HOUSING AND MUNICIPALITY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By: By: Paul Kirkwold • Ramsey County Manager Its: Dated: Dated: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL APPROVED AS TO FORM Judy A. Karon, Director Harry D. McPeak Community and Economic Development Assistant Ramsey County Attorney This Document Drafted By: ® Office of the Ramsey County Attorney St. Paul, Minnesota 27 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY RESOLUTION 00-040 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE RAMSEY COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony has signed cooperation agreements with Ramsey County to ensure the County's eligibility for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME) funds since 1985 and 1992 respectively; and WHEREAS, a second amendment to the Joint Cooperation Agreement is necessary due to HUD requirements for the continuance of Ramsey County's eligibility in said programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves the Second Amendment To The Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority Joint Cooperation Agreement and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign • said agreement on.behalf of the City of St. Anthony. Adopted this day of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City,Clerk Reviewed by Administration: City Manager 29 CITY OF ST ANTHONY • RESOLUTION #00-044 A RESOLUTION FINALIZING THE 1999 AUDIT AND TRANSFERRING DESIGNATED FUNDING SOURCES TO THE APPROPRIATE FUND WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the City Auditors audit report and financial statements; and WHEREAS, transfers are necessary to fund the purchase of capital equipment items approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, annually Cable Reserves are transferred to the Revolving Fund and designated as restricted use; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1) The following transfers be made: • Transfer $30,000 to the Capital Equipment Fund for the purchase of Leaders Software Upgrades. Transfer $2,500 to the Capital Equipment Fund for the purchase of additional Bike Patrol equipment. Transfer $65,000 to the Capital Equipment Fund for the purchase of an Opticom System. Transfer $25,197 of cable reserves to the Revolving Fund and restrict their use for cable and communications items. Adopted this day of, , 2000 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for administration: City Manager IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. • Resolution 00-029 (Award Construction Bid for 29" Avenue NE street improvements • Resolution 00-047 (Approve Change Order #1 for 29th Avenue NE Sidewalk, Lighting, and Landscape Improvements • • Resolution 00-046 (Decorative Lighting on MSA Streets) • Resolution 00-045 (Accept Feasibility Study and Authorize Plans and Specifications for Harding Lift Station Project) • Resolution 00-042 (Call for Sale of GO State Aid Street Bonds) • Resolution 00-043 (Call for Sale of GO Storm Sewer Revenue Bonds) • Ordinance 2000-002 (Obtaining Criminal History Data on Prospective City Employees (2nd reading) • B.A.Mittelstead 3O 350 Westwood Lake Office Bret A.Weis- 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Peter R.Willenbring,P.E. Minneapolis, MN 55426 Donald W.Sterna,PE. • Ronald B. Bray,P.E. 612-541-4800 &Associates, Inc. FAX 541-1700 April 6,2000 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of St Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 Re: 2000 Street & Utility Reconstruction for the City of St. Anthony WSB Project No. 1065-260 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Bids were received for the above-referenced project at 10:00 A.M.,April 5,2000,and were opened and read aloud. A total of 10 bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and tabulated. Barbarossa and Sons,Inc.submitted the lowest bid in the amounts of$2,049,838.66. The engineer's estimate was $2,060,255.05. • We recommend award of the contract to Barbarossa and Sons,Inc. in the amount of$2,049,838.66. Enclosed for your reference is the bid tabulation. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures jam' M i n n e a p o l i s S t . C l o u d Inas"cture Engineers Planners F:\WPWIIJ\1065-?60\rcmmM-hmc.wpd fr EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER - 31 BID TABULATION • - 2000 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 210 AVENUE ST. ANTHONY,MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 161-102-03 Bids Opened. 10:00 a.m. WSB & Associates, Inc. April 5, 2000 Project No. 1065-260 Contractor Addendum I Bid Total Bid Rec'd Security ARCON CONSTRUCTION,INC. �/ �/ $2,423,062.85 BARBAROSSA AND SONS,INC. �/ �/ $2,049,838.66 BROWN AND CRIS,INC. �/ �/ *$2,314,892.76 C.S.MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION,INC �/ �/ $2,423,748.98 FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING,INC. HARDRIVES,INC. LAMETTI&SONS,INC. �/ V $2,492,692.19 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. NORTH VALLEY,INC. NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION �/ V *$2,299,197.86 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY �/ V $2,163,891.72 RICHARD KNUTSON,INC. �/ �/ $2,242,307,00 RYAN CONTRACTING S.J.LOUIS CONSTRUCTION,INC. V/ $2,298,345.70 S.R.WEIDEMA,INC. �/ V $2,306,765.84 THOMAS&SONS CONSTRUCTION,INC. Engineer's Estimate *$2,060,255.05 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tab ation of the bids as received on April 5, 2000. Todd E. Hubmer,P.E. *Denotes Corrected Figure • F.IWPW1M1065-16OLSPw bidtab.nyd 32 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION • THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the 23rd day of May, by and between the City of St. Anthony, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the"Owner', and Barbarossa and Sons, Inc., hereinafter called the"Contractor". WITNESSETH: That in consideration of their mutual covenants and agreements as hereinafter set forth,the Owner for itself and the Contractor for itself, its successors, and assigns, covenants and agrees as follows, to wit: 1. The Contractor agrees to furnish all the necessary materials,labor,use of tools,equipment,plant and every other thing necessary to perform the work designated and referred to in this Contract,including all Contractor's superintendence, and to furnish everything necessary for the completion of the improvement which is the subject of this Contract(except such things as the Owner has specifically agreed to provide, according to the Contract Documents); and agrees under penalty of a public contractor's corporate surety bond in the amount of Two Million Forty-nine Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-eight,and 66/100 Dollars($2,049,838.66)to perform and complete the work shown in the plans and drawings, and described in the project manual entitled "2000 Street and Utility Improvements, S.A.P. 161-102-03,for the City of St.Anthony, Hennepin County, Minnesota", prepared by WSB & Associates, Inc., and dated December 23, 1999, and to conform in all respects with the provisions and requirements of the General Conditions,Supplementary General Conditions and Specifications for said improvement. 2. The Contractor agrees that performance shall be in accordance with the terms, requirements and • conditions of this instrument, and laws of the State of Minnesota, and the following documents. ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS for said Improvement for the Owner. PROPOSAL by the Contractor,presented to the Council of the Owner on April 5,2000 and accepted by the Owner on May 23, 2000. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS for said Improvement dated December 23, 1999, referred to in the preceding paragraph of this Agreement and made a part of the aforementioned proposal. PLANS AND DRAWINGS for said Improvement as identified in a preceding paragraph of this Contract and which are dated December 23, 1999. ANY ADDENDA to the plans,drawings,general conditions and specifications for said Improvement which addenda were prepared by WSB &Associates, Inc. PUBLIC CONTRACTOR'S SURETY BOND in the principal sum of the amount bid. Each and all of the aforementioned Contract Documents are hereby incorporated into this Contract by specific reference and the terms and provisions thereof are and constitute a part of this Contract as though attached hereto or fully set forth herein. WSB PROJECT NO.1065.26 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION CFC-PAGE 1 33 3. The Owner agrees to pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract and the Contr c. agrees to accept in full compensation therefor,the sums set forth within the aforementioned proposal of the Contractor for each unit and each type of unit of work to be performed. It is understood and • agreed that the said proposal is for the construction of said Improvement on a unit price basis in accordance with the said proposal,and that sum of$2,049,838.66 set out in said proposal,is the sum of the unit prices,multiplied by the estimated quantities of the respective units of work listed therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. CONTRACTOR CITY OF ST.ANTHONY, MN By Dennis Cavanaugh, Mayor By Michael Mornson, Manager (Corporate Seal) (City Seal) By Authorized Official WSB PROJECT NO.1065.26 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION CFC-PAGE 2 34 • - CITY OF ST. ANTHONY RESOLUTION 00-029 A RESOLUTION AWARDING A BID FOR 29`' AVENUE NE STREET AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement as shown on the plan for the above referenced project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and, the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Bidder Total Bid Arcon Construction, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,423,062.85 Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,049,838.66 Brown and Cris, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,314,892.76 C. S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,423,748.98 Lametti & Sons, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,492,692.19 Northdale Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,299,197.86 Park construction Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,163,891.72 Richard Knutson, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,242,307.00 S. Louis Construction, Inca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,298,345.70 • S. R. Weidemma, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,306,765.84 WHEREAS, It appears that Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony: 1. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed.to enter into a contract with Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. in the amount of$2,049,838.66 in the name of the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota for the improvement outlined in the above referenced project according to the plans and specifications, therefore, approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The Engineer, WSB & Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted this day of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: • City Clerk Reviewed by Administration: City Manager 35 • CHANGE ORDER NO.1 2000 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF ST.ANTHONY S.A.P.161-102-03 WSB PROJECT NO.1065-263 Owner: City of St.Anthony Date of Issuance: May 15,2000 Contractor: Barbarossa&Sons, Inc. Engineer: WSB&Associates, Inc. You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Document description: 1. Furnish and install additional concrete walk as shown on the attached figures. 2. Furnish and install modular block retaining walls along 291h Avenue from 17+25 to 19+25. 3. Furnish and install 15 additional Autumn Blaze Maple,2.5"Cal B&B. 4. Furnish and install 15 additional Bur Oak,2.5"cal B&B. CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Price: $2,049,838.66 Original Contract Time: October 1,2000 Previous Change Orders: No. 1 to 1: -- Net Change from Previous Change Orders: None Contract Price Prior to This Change Order: $2,049,838.66 Contract Time Prior to This Change Order: October 1,2000 • Net Increase of This Change Order: $47,470.25 Net Increase of Change Order: None Contract Price With All Approved Change $2,097,308.91 Contract Time With Approved Change October 1,2000 Orders: Orders: Recommended By: Approved By: Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. WSB&Associates Inc. Barbarossa&Sons Inc. Engineer Contractor Approved By: Approved By: Date of Council Action: City Engineer City Administrator • F:\WP W M\1065-26\co-1 36 • Change Order No.1 2000 STREET&UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF ROSEMOUNT S.A.P.161-102-03 WSB PROJECT NO.1065-263 Added Items Item Total No. Spec.No. Description Quantity Units Unit Price Item Total 1 2411.603 Modular Block Retaining Wall 250.00 Sq Ft $ 18.50 $4,625.00 2 2521.501 4"Concrete Walk 15,915.00 Sq Ft $ 2.25 $35,808.75 3 2571.502 Autumn Blaze Maple 2.5"Cal B&B 15.00 Tree $ 225.00 $3,375.00 4 2571.502 Bur Oak 2.5"Cal B&B 15.00 Tree $ 225.00 $3,375.00 5 2575.505 Sodding Type Lawn 1,250.00 Sq Ft $ 1.65 $2,062.50 • Total Added Items $49,246.25 Deleted Items Item I Total No. Spec.No. Description Quantity Units Unit Price Item Total 1 Bituminous Bike Path 320.00 Lin. Ft. $ 5.55 $1,776.00 Total Deleted Items $1,776.00 • F:\WPWIM1065-26\co-1 37 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY RESOLUTION .00-047 A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 RELATING TO SIDEWALK, LIGHTING, AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS TO 29TH AVENUE NE WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make changes in the Contract Document relating to sidewalk, lighting, and landscaping improvements to 29 h Avenue NE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves Change Order No. 1 to the Contract Document relating to improvements to 29`h Avenue NE. Adopted this day of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed by Administration: City Manager B.A.Aiittelstea 38 350 Westwood Lake Office Bret A.We.: 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Peter n Wi Sterna,RE. Minneapolis, MN 55426 Donald W.Sterna,P.E. ® Ronald B. Bray,P.E. 612 7541-4800 &Associates, Inc. FAX 541-1700 May 17, 2000 Honorable Mayor, Council, and City Staff City of St Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 Re: Recommended Changes to the City Street Lighting Policy and Procedures WSB Project No. 1065-26 Dear Honorable Mayor, Council, and City Staff: Attached please find the street lighting.policy and procedures for the City of St. Anthony. Also attached for your consideration is a resolution which would modify the City's existing street lighting policy and procedures to include No. 6 under the City Policy section on page 1 of the Policies and Procedures. This additional City Policy is proposed to read as follows: • 6. The City will require that upon complete reconstruction of municipal state aid streets where pedestrian walkways are provided, decorative lighting shall be required as part of these improvements. Decorative lighting shall conform with the recommendations of the City Council after review of the lighting plan by the City Planning Commission and City Parks Commission. Installation of decorative lighting will not be assessed to residents along municipal state aid streets. If you have any questions,please call me at 763-277-5782. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Todd E."Hubmer, P.E. Project Manager Attachment jw/kd M i n n e a p o l i s S t . C l o u d Infrastructure Engineers Planners F:\WPWITJ\1065-26\051700•hmcc.wpd EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 39 CITY OF ST.ANTHONY STREET LIGHTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES City Policy Before the City will approve the installation and assume the operating costs of a street light, one of the following criteria must be met regarding the location of any proposed street light. 1. Intersections: i.e., where any two streets intersect. 2. Cul-de-sacs or other dead end street locations. 3. Hills, curves, or other conditions.which create vehicular/pedestrian safety hazards. This normally occurs in a situation where a hill or curve blocks out visibility of a street light in either direction. 4. Mid-block locations where the block is longer than the normal block. This usually occurs in those blocks that are over 800 feet in length. 5. Areas where there has been a problem with vandalism or other crime. Usually this occurs adjacent to railroad tracks or other areas where the potential for vandalism is high. Information is requested from the Police Department on the number of crime cases that are reported in the area of the street light request(vandalism, burglary, etc.). - It should-be noted-that the only way-in which alleys may qualify for a street light is under... .. - -, criterion No. 5. Administrative Procedures All requests for the installation of street lights should be.in writing. Once such a request is received the following procedure is followed: 1. Physical review of the site of the proposed light location. 2. Review of City policy to determine if the proposed site is in agreement with the policy. 3. If the request is in conformance with City policy,a request is sent to Northern • States Power Company (NSP). NSP will then do a physical review of the site to determine if the light can be installed without cost to the City. Installation is usually free of charge if there is easy access to a service point and/or an City of St. Anthony Street Lighting Policy and Procedures page 2 existing pole. If the light meets the criteria, the City will assume the installation/operating costs. The NSP Street Light Coordinator will perform the site review. The request need not be made in writing; a phone call is. adequate. NSP will reply in writing and enclose a map of the proposed site indicating a possible location. City staff will contact NSP. 4. If installation of the light can be done at no charge to the City,the"Street Light Approval Form"is sent to the residents requesting the light. On this form, the owner of the property on which the light will be placed and the abutting property owners must give their approval to the location of the proposed street light. Usually four to six signatures are required, depending on the site. If all of the abutting property owners do not approve the proposed location, the light cannot be installed. 5.. If any assessments to properties affected are proposed to be levied, a public • hearing must be held unless the property owners waive their right to this procedure. 6. When the "Street Light Approval Form" is returned to the City with all appropriate signatures, a written request is sent to NSP for the installation of the proposed street light. The address for doing so is Northern States Power Company, Street Lighting Coordinator, 1518 Chestnut Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403. NSP will place the request on their work schedule and install the light at their earliest convenience. City staff will. . . make this request if the conditions warrant approval. In the event that a request for a street light must be denied,the person making the request shall be informed of two possible alternatives. 1. NSP can install,a light free of charge, if there is a close service point,but will charge the residents for the operation costs. The operating costs are. approximate $7.00 a month. However,NSP will mail only one bill to one property owner and a three-year contract must be signed. 2. Abutting property owners may petition the City asking that they be assessed for all costs of the light through special assessment. The City will then arrange for the installation of the proposed light. 10/98 41 _ 'ai n thon • - ills e Administrative Offices 3301. Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699 (612) 789-8881 FAX (612) 781-9323 Street Light Amroval Form The undersigned being the owners of property abutting the proposed street light at do hereby give consent to the installation of a street light at the same location. Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: . Address: Please return to: Jay Hartman Director of Public Works City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St.Anthony,NL .. 55418 42 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY • RESOLUTION 00-046 A RESOLUTION INCORPORATING DECORATIVE LIGHTING FOR MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS INTO THE CITY OF ST.ANTHONY STREET LIGHTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony desires to incorporate decorative lighting into the design and reconstruction of municipal state aid streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony: That the Council amends the City of St. Anthony Street Lighting Policy and Procedures to include the following City policy as Policy No. 6: 6. The City will require that upon complete reconstruction of municipal state aid streets where pedestrian walkways are provided, decorative lighting shall be required as part of these improvements. Decorative lighting shall conform with the recommendations of the City Council after review of the lighting plan by the City Planning Commission and City Parks Commission. Installation of decorative lighting will not be assessed to • residents along municipal state aid streets. Adopted this day of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for administration: City Manager • F:\W P9\Ord&Re9\DecLighting-ren.wpd 43 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY • RESOLUTION 00-045 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HARDING STREET LIFT STATION-AND FORCEMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to direction of the City of St. Anthony, a report has been prepared with reference to the improvements: Hardin Street Lift Station and Forcemain This project consists of rehabilitating the existing sanitary sewer lift station structure, replacing the existing pumps, and constructing new forcemain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony: 1. The Council accepts the Feasibility Report for the Harding Street Lift Station and Forcemain Improvement Project. , • 2. The Council directs WSB & Associates, Inc.,to prepare final plans and specifications to complete the recommended improvements as outlined in the Feasibility Report. Adopted this day of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for administration: City Manager • F:\W P9\Ord&Res\Aceepff eas-res,wpd CITY OF ST. ANTHONY RESOLUTION 00-041 44 -. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION STATE-AID STREET BONDS, SERIES 2000B BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony (the City), as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The City Council has determined to be in the best interests of the City to issue its General Obligation State-Aid Street Bonds, Series 2000B in the principal amount of $950,000 (the Bonds) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.18 and Chapter 475 to finance the cost of construction and improvement of various state-aid roads (the Projects). The Bonds shall be issued on terms such that the average annual amount of principal and interest due in all subsequent calendar years on the Bonds shall not exceed 50 percent of the amount of the last annual allotment received by the City from the municipal state aid fund. Section 2. Terms of Proposal. Springsted Incorporated, financial consultant to the City, has presented to this Council a form of Terms of Proposal for sale of the Bonds, which is attached hereto and hereby approved and shall be placed on file with the City Clerk. Each and all of the provisions of the Terms of Proposal are hereby adopted as the terms and conditions of the Bonds and of the sale thereof. Springsted Incorporated, as independent financial advisors, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9) is hereby authorized to solicit bids for the Bonds ® on behalf of the City on a negotiated basis. Section 3. Sale Meeting. This Council shall meet with the City Hall on Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 7:00 o'clock P.M. for the purpose of considering sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds, and of taking such action thereon as may be in the best interests of the City. Section 4. Reimbursement of Costs from Proceeds of the Bonds. All or a portion of the costs-of the'Projects maybe paid by-the City pnorto the issuance of the Bonds to•finance•the-•••­ - __.., Projects, and to the extent such costs are paid by the City prior to the issuance of the Bonds it is the reasonable intent of the City to reimburse all of a portion of the costs of the Projects paid by the City prior to the issuance of the Bonds from the proceeds of the Bonds. Adopted Attest: City Clerk Mayor Reviewed for administration. • City Manager CITY OF ST. ANTHONY_; 4c RESOLUTION 00-043 aD ® RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION STORM SEWER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2000A BE IT RESOLVED by the City.Council of the City of St. Anthony(the City), as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The City operates a storm sewer utility pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075. It is hereby determined to be in the best interests of the City to issue its General Obligation Storm Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A (the Bonds), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, the proceeds, net of issuance expenses, to be used to finance various improvements to the City's storm sewer system (the Project). Section 2. Terms of Proposal. Springsted Incorporated,financial_consultant to the City, has presented to this Council a form of Terms of Proposal for sale of the Bonds, which is attached hereto and hereby approved and shall be placed on file with the City Clerk. Each and all of the provisions of the Terms of Proposal are hereby adopted as the terms and conditions of the Bonds and of the sale thereof. Springsted Incorporated, as independent financial advisors, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9) is hereby authorized to solicit bids for the Bonds • on behalf of the City on a negotiated basis. Section 3. Sale Meeting. This Council shall meet with the City Hall on Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 7:00 o'clock P.M. for the purpose of considering sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds, and of taking such action thereon as may be in the best interests of the City. Section 4. Reimbursement of Costs from Proceeds of the Bonds. All or a portion of the costs of the Project may be paid by the City prior to the issuance of the Bonds to finance the -Projecf,Ahtl'to the extent such costs are paid-by-the City-prior to-the-issuance-of the Bonds it.i&the reasonable intent of the City to reimburse all of a portion of the costs of the Project paid by the City prior to the issuance of the Bonds from the proceeds of the Bonds. Adopted.:. Attest: City Clerk Mayor Reviewed for administration. City Manager • MEMORANDUM 46 DATE: 4/18/2000 MEETING DATE. 5/9/2000 TO: Mayor and Council THROUGH: City Manager Mornson FROM: sistant City Manager Isom RE: Ordinance #2000-002, Adding Section 300.04(c) Authorizing the City Manager to Obtain Background/Criminal History Data About Finalist for City Positions The proposed ordinance will enable the City Manager to obtain criminal history data contained in the Minnesota Criminal Justice Information System of the finalists for City positions. It also enables the City Manager, upon obtaining an authorized consent form, to research criminal history data on a person.who has, may have, or seeks to have access to a child, under Minnesota Statutes 299C.61, and who is employed by, volunteers with, or seeks to be employed by or volunteer with the City or with a children's service provider utilizing city parks, buildings, or facilities. • The fiscal impact of implementing/administering the services associated with this ordinance will originate from the General Fund - Police account. Funds are available. Staff Recommendation: Motion to approve Ordinance #2000-002. Consequently, the cities of Blaine and Fridley have passed similar ordinances. Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin Police Chief Engstrom • MEMORANDUM 110 • DATE: March 10, 2000 TO: Richard.Engstrom, Chief of Police FROM: Kim Dulz SUBJECT: CRIMINAL HISTORY CHECKS A criminal history background check, through the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, may be conducted in one of two ways: 1. Submitting an informed consent to the BCA with a check for $8.00. This fee will be increased as of April 1, 2000. 2. Having a City Ordinance that allows criminal history checks on employment applicants. • After checking, the City of St. Anthony does not have an ordinance allowing for criminal history checks of employment applicants for the city. I contacted area cities and received the following information. Attached are copies of ordinances received from the cities of Roseville, Fridley, and Blaine. After a review of these ordinances, I would recommend the Blaine ordinance be used as a model policy. In the first paragraph after.... contained in the Minnesota Criminal Justice Information System... I would add"and the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension." The only reason I would recommend this is because, on the informed consent, the BCA requires that it be stated the information will be obtained from.the BCA. . Also attached, for your information, is a copy of Blaine's policy on conducting background checks for coaches. I don't know if we have an ordinance similar to this, but I think it would definitely be something positive for the safety of children participating in various events sponsored by Community Services. Note: Without fingerprint cards, and informed consents, being submitted to the BCA, records check will only advise of Minnesota conviction records. The reason for this is • every state has its own Data Practices Laws regarding what can be released and for what reason the information may be released. 48 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ORDINANCE NO. 2000-002 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO OBTAINING CRIMINAL HISTORY DATA, AMENDING SECTION 300.04 OF THE 1993 ST. ANTHONY CODE OF ORDINANCES The City Council'of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 300.04 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances is amended by adding the following: 300.04 Appointments. (c) Upon the request of the City Manager or designee, the police department shall provide certain criminal history data contained in the Minnesota Criminal Justice Information System. The data to be provided must only be about finalists for City positions of employment. The City Manager or designee must obtain the consent of the finalists before requesting the data, but an applicant's failure to provide consent will disqualify the applicant .from the prospective position. Pursuant to an authorized consent form, the City Manager or designee may obtain criminal history data on a person who has, may have, or seeks to have access to a child under Minnesota Statutes 299C.61 and who is employed by, volunteers with, or seeks to be employed by or volunteer with the City or with a children's service provider utilizing city parks, buildings, or facilities. These background checks shall be in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 299C.60 to 299C.64 known as "Minnesota Child protection Background Check Act." Section 2. This ordinance will be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: May 9, 2000 Second Reading: May 23, 2000 Adopted: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • Publish: . St. Anthony Bulletin • X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF. • Planning Commission meeting - May 16, 2000. Ordinance 2000-006 (Amend Planned Unit Development Ordinance-(1 S` reading) • City Manager I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY DRAFT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES • 3 MAY 16, 2000 49 4 7:00 p.m. 5 CALL TO ORDER. 6 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. 7 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 8 Chair Bergstrom invited the Commission and audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 9 ROLL CALL. 10 Present: Chair Bergstrom; Commissioners Tillmann, Hanson, Thomas, 11 Melsha, Hatch, and Stille. 12 Commissioners absent: None. 13 Also present: Spencer A. Isom, Assistant City Manager. 14 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE 15 FOLLOWING ITEMS: 16 None. •17 I. PUBLIC INPUT. 18 Chair Bergstrom invited anyone from the audience to provide general input to the Planning Com- 19 mission. 20 Patty Salser, 2905 Silver Lake Court, stated that she and her husband are current co-presidents of 21 the Silver Lake Residents Association and they participate with the water quality task force as well. 22 She announced that the Task Force felt that it is very important that action is taken with regard to 23 the water quality of Silver Lake, particularly in light of the fact that Silver Lake is a community 24 resource for fishing and swimming. A suggestion had been given that ponding of the water before 25 the stormwater runs into Silver Lake could be a viable option and she wished to pass that suggestion 26 along to the Commission. 27 Chair Bergstrom reassured Ms. Salser that the Commission shares her concerns. 28 II. MINUTES. 29 Motion by Thomas,second by Hanson,to approve the April 18,2000 Planning Commission meeting 30 minutes with the following modification: 31 Page 2, Line 16, change "Office/high tech"to "commercial mixed use designation." 32 Motion carried unanimously. •33 III. COMMUNICATION FROM CITY COUNCIL. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 50 May 16, 2000 Page 2 • 1 Commissioner Stille agreed to attend the City Council meeting on Tuesday,May 23,as the Planning 2 Commission Liaison. 3 IV. REQUESTS FOR POSTPONEMENTS OR WITHDRAWALS OF APPLICATIONS. 4 1. Withdrawal of Hillcrest Development's request for zoning map change and zoning code 5 amendment. 6 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom provided background information on this subject for the 7 Commission by stating that on April 18, 2000, the Commission heard Hillcrest's request for the 8 following (1) an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate an office/High-tech 9 designation; (2) a petition for new zoning district for Apache Plaza property from a C-1 to a C-2 10 Commercial which would allow a change from strictly retail use to office,commercial,warehouse, 11 and light industrial uses; and (3) an amendment to the zoning ordinance for a change from C-1 to 12 a C-2 district. During the April 18,2000 meeting,the Commission asked Hillcrest to withdraw their 13 request for items two and three. 14 Consequently,Hillcrest Development has submitted a formal request to withdraw its application for 15 zoning map change and zoning code amendment. 16 Motion by Melsha, second by Tillmann, to accept Hillcrest Development's withdrawal letter, as �17 written by Anthony J. Gleekel, dated April 25, 2000. 18 Motion carried unanimously. 19 V. NEW APPLICATIONS/PUBLIC HEARINGS. 20 1. Public Hearing. Ordinance 2000-006 relating to zoning and planned unit developments; 21 amending section 1655 of the St. Anthony Code of Ordinances in its entirety. 22 Chair Bergstorm opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. 23 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom reviewed for the Commission that Ordinance 2000-006, a 24 copy of which is in the Commission's agenda packets,is consistent with the May 4,2000 update of 25 . the critical path for the planned unit development/ordinance process and Hillcrest Development's 26 redevelopment of Apache Plaza. The ordinance was drafted by the City's planning consultant 27 ("DSU") and subsequently edited by City Attorney Soth. 28 In this respect,Isom invited planning consultant John Shardlow,DSU,to address the Commission. 29 Mr. Shardlow reviewed that the firm of DSU had been contacted to assist the City with the Apache 30 Plaza redevelopment project. Subsequently, Mr. Shardlow recommended that the City pursue a 031 Planned Unit Development ("PUD"), but in order to do that,the City needed to create a new land 32 use designation. That designation would be a commercial mixed land use designation,and there is 33 currently an application pending before the Metropolitan Council for a minor amendment to the 34 Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 51 May 16, 2000 Page 3 • 1 Mr. Shardlow presented a pyramid illustration which indicated the level of control and discretion 2 that is available to cities in different categories of the illustration. 3 Mr. Shardlow explained the definition of a PUD, which is also listed in the proposed Ordinance 4 2000-006. In essence, a PUD is a zoning district and development plan which may include single 5 or mixed uses, and one or more lots or parcels, and which is intended to create a more flexible, 6 creative, and efficient approach to the use of land. A PUD site must be three acres in size, and . 7 applications for PUD approval will not be considered for sites of less than 3 acres. Stille inquired about Section 1655.09, Subd. 4., Securily., which was page five of the proposed Ordinance 2000-006. Stille stated that the section mentioned that a letter of credit in a form acceptable to the city shall be required to guarantee performance by the Developer. Stille suggested an addition to the section which would address an acceptable source to obtain the letter of credit. 8 Mr. Shardlow stated he would mention that issue to City Attorney William Soth. 9 Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. 10 Chair Bergstrom asked the Commissioners for comments. 101 Thomas is satisfied with the PUD. 12 Hanson asked if the park dedication ordinance would be addressed. Bergstrom responded that he 13 would envision that to be placed in the PUD Agreement. Mr. Shardlow agreed that the park dedica- 14 tion ordinance would be addressed in the PUD agreement. Furthermore,he stated that City Attorney 15 Soth would address the issue in the subdivision regulations. 16 Hatch inquired about the possibility of future requests regarding PUDs. 17 Mr. Shardlow said the ability to vary from rigid setbacks is an excellent option for the City because 18 a property could be custom designed. 19 Stille stated that he had reviewed another city's PUD and was informed that there is a need for 20 finding of fact for the applicant. This finding of fact would be intended to assure the community and 21 the City that the PUD is in the best interest of the community. 22 Mr. Shardlow assured the Commission that any time a zoning decision is made,the findings of fact 23 are adopted. It would be Mr. Shardlow's assumption that, as part of his retainment with the City, 24 that factual information would be included in the findings and then would go to the City Council as 25 a draft set of findings. 0-6 Motion by Thomas, second by Tillmann, to adopt Ordinance 2000-006, an Ordinance Relating to 27 Zoning and Planned Unit Developments; Amending Section 1655 of the St. Anthony Code of 28 Ordinances in its Entirety. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 16, 2000 Page 4 0 1 Motion Carried Unanimously. 2 VI. POSTPONED APPLICATIONS. 3 None. 4 VII. REPORTS,PRESENTATIONS, AND/OR CONCEPT REVIEWS. 5 1. Concept Review. 4004 Fordham Drive Lot Width and Lot Area Variance Request. 6 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom stated that David and Pauletta Sperry were asking for a 7 variance for their property at 4004 Fordham Drive. The Commission and City Council had previ- 8 ously heard the request(both in May 1999),and both the Council and the Commission approved the 9 request. However, the variance request would expire on May 25, 2000, and Mr. and Mrs. Sperry 10 have not been able to complete the project. Under City Ordinance,the structure must be constructed 11 within one year from the date the variance is granted, or a new Petition for Variance must begin. 12 Chair Bergstrom invited Mr. and Mrs. Sperry to address the Commission. Mr. Sperry stated that 13 they were delayed in beginning construction last summer,and have recently come to an agreement 14 about the structure,and have a plan in hand. Mr. Sperry said the plan is not exactly the same as was 15 approved last year, and the plan still falls within the 35% lot coverage restriction. The reason for 16 the ordinance is because the lot in question is 60 feet wide and its area is.7,985 square feet and as 07 such;not considered a buildable residential lot according to City Ordinance. The Ordinance states 18 that a residential lot in the R-1 Zoning District must be a minimum 75 feet wide and an interior lot 19 must be not less than 9,000 square feet. The Sperrys are asking for a lot width variance of 15 feet 20 and a lot area variance of 1,015 square feet. 21 Mr. Sperry presented a rendering of the proposed structure, showing the rear elevation, front ele- 22 vation, and floor plan. Mr. Sperry said they are ready to continue, but simply need the building 23 permit. 24 Hatch noted that it would appear from the sketch presented that runoff from the roof would run 25 towards the corners of the house. Mr..Sperry noted that the drainage would mostly drain towards 26 the street and he had been careful in the plans of the home to ensure that runoff did not drain into 27 neighboring yards. Even with that in mind,Mr. Sperry noted his plans to consult with neighbors to 28 ensure that drainage would not jeopardize the adjoining properties.. 29 Bergstrom mentioned that it appeared that the plan was consistent with the plans presented last year. 30 However, he stated it would be critical to indicate the side yard setbacks for the next Planning 31 Commission Meeting. 32 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr. and Mrs. Sperry for their presentation and input. •33 2. Concept Review. AT&T Wireless to request Conditional Use Permit for 75 foot monopole 34 tower at 2801 37th Avenue NE. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 53 May 16, 2000 Page 5 • 1 Assistant City Manager Isom reviewed for the Commission that AT&T Wireless Services (AWS) 2 was interested in filing an application for a Conditional Use permit to allow for a new 75-foot cellu- .3 lar monopole to be placed on an industrial zoned property at 2801 37th Avenue NE. Permission has 4 been obtained by the owner of the property,and the AWS monopole would be the second such pole 5 on the property. The first pole is owned by US West Wireless Services (USWW). 6 Isom introduced Julie Townsend, Contractor, AT&T Wireless Services, and invited her to address . 7 the Commission. Ms. Townsend stated that AWS is proposing to place a similar structure on the 8 property such as US West has installed. AWS is not able to use the existing USWW structure to co- g locate because AWS needs at least 75 feet for antenna placement. Along with a new monopole, 10 AWS would be constructing an equipment shelter to house the radio cabinets. The shelter is planned I 1 to be 12' by 28' and 10' tall and constructed of a material that is acceptable to the City. 12 Bergstrom asked why the two poles couldn't be combined. Ms. Townsend stated that many of the 13 carriers co-locate often; however, negotiations between USWW and AWS had fallen through and 14 the companies were not able to agree on the issue of co-locating poles. 15 Ms. Townsend presented a site map and pointed out several potential locations for the pole. Bergstorm offered that if the antenna could be tucked behind a building for an aesthetics purpose; • that would be-the optimal choice. Ms.Townsend inquired of Assistant City an Isom if there was an accessory structure setback. Isom stated that he would research the setback requirements and 16 return an answer to her at a later time. 17 Hatch inquired about the possibility of putting the equipment underground. Ms. Townsend re- 18 sponded that such an option had been reviewed by engineers and other professionals,and it had been 19 determined that the equipment could not be placed underground. This is due in part to the harsh 20 Minnesota climate. 21 Thomas mentioned that the issue of antenna placement had been discussed at another Planning 22 Commission meeting, and it was explained at that time that St. Anthony is a desirable place for 23 antennas and towers. Thomas stated his belief that there should be more cooperation between the 24 companies to minimize the number of towers and antennas going up within the community. 25 Ms. Townsend stated that AT&T would be willing to coordinate with another carried in the future, 26 but a taller monopole would have to be installed to accommodate more than one carrier. Till mann inquired if there was a conditional use permit for the existing pole and what type of con_ ditions have been enacted into the permit. Isom stated that there is a conditional use permit;how- ever,the specifics of the permit were unknown. Tillmann wondered if there was a way to nudge US 27 West into reconsidering negotiations with AT&T regarding placement of a monopole. • Bergstrom summarized the issue for Ms.Townsend by stating that the Commission would prefer that the base and accessory building be on the north side and if variances and setbacks were required, 28 then Ms. Townsend would need to meet with Assistant City Manager Isom. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 16, 2000 Page 6 1 Hatch requested photographs of the proposed structure from different angles and the various lo- 2 cations discussed from the site map presented earlier to be presented at the next Planning 3 Commission meeting. 4 Thomas requested a photograph of the existing pole. Ms. Townsend agreed to both requests. 5 Bergstrom thanked Ms. Townsend for her presentation. 6 3. APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND SKETCH PLAN. Staff, Planning Consultant, and 7 Commission to hear Hillcrest Developments "Application Conference" and"Sketch Plan" 8 for the redevelopment of the Apache Plaza. 9 Assistant City Manager Isom reviewed for the Commission that the application conference is con- 10 sistent with the May 15, 2000 update of the critical path for planned unit development ordi- 11 nance/process and Hillcrest Development's redevelopment of the Apache Plaza. Proposed Ordi- 12 nance 2000-006 outlines the procedures for processing a Planned Unit Development. The appli- 13 cation conference and sketch plan are the first steps of said procedure. Isom noted for the Com- 14 mission that pertinent sections of the proposed ordinance are included in the agenda packets. 15 Mr. Shardlow(DSU) addressed the Commission and stated that he was in attendance to represent •16 the Staff. Additionally, Hillcrest Development's application would be the first application to be 17 reviewed under the new PUD ordinance, and so it needed to be reviewed carefully. Furthermore, 18 Mr.Shardlow stated that this is the City's opportunity to ask questions of the developer,particularly 19 the need to define the range of uses that would be appropriated within the building and the intensity 20 of the landscaping. 21 Bergstrom thanked Mr. Shardlow for his input and attendance. 22 Anthony Gleekel, attorney for Hillcrest Development, addressed the Commission. Mr. Gleekel 23 stated that he had attended a meeting recently with Chair Bergstrom,Assistant City Attorney Isom, 24 and John Shardlow(DSU),and the application was reviewed during that meeting. Mr.Gleekel noted 25 that the application, application fee, cover letter, exhibits, and narrative that have been presented 26 represent the results of discussions held over the past several months. 27 Mr. Gleekel continued by stating that further information would be submitted, including a rudi- 28 mentary landscaping plan and other issues, such as parking islands, and the beautification of the . 29 exterior building. Additionally,Hillcrest has met with a consultant regarding the watershed district 30 issue and different options are being reviewed and considered. With regard to lighting, Hillcrest 31 continues to work with Staff and designers in order to meet City Code and provide prospective 32 tenants with safe and effective lighting. is 33 Mr.Gleekel wished to be clear in stating that Hillcrest Development is not interested in placing any 34 housing or retail on the site. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 55 May 16, 2000 Page 7 1 Isom noted that there is a clock associated with the application process and that some additional 2 information would be needed from Hillcrest Development in order to complete the process. In the 3. meantime, a public hearing on this issue is scheduled for the June 20, 2000 Planning Commission 4 meeting and the information must be submitted prior to that time. 5 Mr. Gleekel responded that the plans are in the process and that Tuesday, May 30, 2000 would be 6 the latest date he would perceive the plans being submitted. 7 Mr. Scott Tankenoff, managing partner of Hillcrest Development, noted that the New Market site 8 is not considered ancillary at this point and believed it was needed to support the Apache Plaza site 9 at this time. 10 Bergstrom mentioned the watershed issues. Mr. Tankenoff stated that Hillcrest Development is 11 taking the watershed issue seriously and that many comments have been made about the water 12 quality of Silver Lake. Mr.'Tankenoff stated that he has talked with many residents as well as City 13 Staff,and that Hillcrest Development is planning on including a meaningful amount of time relating 14 to stormwater quality for the site. 15 Hanson noted that some of the impervious surfaces around Apache Plaza might be alleviated once 16 the landscaping planned for the site is accomplished. This could assist in alleviating some of the •17 stormwater quality issue. 18 Bergstrom noted that the Commission would like to view drawings on how traffic is proposed to be 19 circulated around the site. He believed that the City would like to manage some traffic control so 20 jams would not occur going across the bridge. 21 Bergstrom inquired if a signage package had been developed. Mr. Gleekel responded that a signage 22 package was being developed,but the ultimate plans would depend upon the type of clients obtained. 23 Bergstrom suggested that a form of a comprehensive signage package be presented for consideration " 24 and review to the Planning Commission when Hillcrest arrives at that planning stage. 25 Hanson inquired about the lack of potential food suppliers in the area to support the tenants of the 26 building. Mr. Tankenoff responded that there are three options currently available and others are 27 being considered. 28 Bergstrom asked Mr. Tankenoff to discuss in the preliminary plan the idea that Hillcrest Devel- 29 opment might be approached by wireless companies wishing to place antennas on top of the 30 building. Mr. Tankenoff responded that issue would be addressed in the plan. 31 Bergstrom inquired about the community space concept for Apache Plaza. Mr. Tankenoff en- •32 couraged the City to form a task force to consider variations of options. Mr. Tankenoff offered that 33 the community space concept would not be driving the redevelopment project; however, he would 34 be interested in obtaining visions from the City about the concept in order to continue with 56 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 16, 2000 Page 8 • 1 preliminary concepts. Bergstrom encouraged Mr. Tankenoff to work with the City and consultant 2 John Shardlow about the scope of the project. 3 In response to questions regarding a backup plan for the redevelopment,Mr. Shardlow clarified that 4 the proposal from Hillcrest is to redevelop the property, and there will be an understanding within 5 the PUD to that extent. However,there also needs to be an understanding about a separate backup 6 plan. Mr. Shardlow stressed that it is important to anticipate the process and have a potential . 7 alternative plan. 8 Hanson inquired if underground parking would be considered. Mr.Tankenoff responded that a plan 9 would be submitted about access to the basement of the site; however,he stated that currently the 10 majority of the basement does not have a floor, no sprinkler system, and would not easily be 11 subdivided. 12 Hanson inquired about the relationships with the current retailers of the site. Mr. Tankenoff re- 13 sponded that discussions have been ongoing with the retailers, particularly Herbergers, and that 14 Herbergers is considering alternatives to suit what is best for its own business plan. There are a 15 small amount of other tenants within the site that are on a month-to-month leasing basis, and it 16 would be likely that those tenants would need to vacate the property once construction has begun. • Bergstrom summarized by stating that the City would be receiving pertinent information by the end of May 2000, and the Planning Commission would be having a worksession on June 6, 2000. Bergstrom reiterated his request to have information provided to the Commission prior to the June 17 6, 2000 worksession in order to allow the Commissioners time to review the information. 18 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr. Gleekel and Mr. Tankenoff for their input and presentations. 19 4. REPORTS. Livable Communities Fund Application/Status Report. 20 Chair Bergstrom invited Mr. Shardlow (DSU) to approach the Commission. Mr. Shardlow sug- 21 gested that a subcommittee of the Planning Commission meet with himself and a representative of 22 the developer(Hillcrest)and arrive at a particular planning process. This is due to the fact that there 23 is not enough time to do things in the typical matter of process and there might be a possibility to 24 request some funding. It would be Mr. Shardlow's hope that if the community was successful in 25 obtaining the funding, it would be more likely in the future for additional funding. 26 It was agreed that a meeting would be held on Monday,May 22,2000 at 3:00 p.m.and any members 27 of the Planning Commission were encouraged to attend as part of a subcommittee, along with John 28 Shardlow and representatives of Hillcrest Development. 29 Chair Bergstrom called a five-minute recess at 9:25 p.m. •30 Chair Bergstrom called the meeting to order at 9:30 p.m. 31 VIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS. 57 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 16, 2000 Page 9 I Assistant City Manager Isom reviewed for the Commission that he had been requested at the last 2 meeting to obtain copies from Doug Jones (2505 Silver Lane NE) of various correspondence re- 3 garding the stormwater drainage issue. Isom noted for the Commission the package of information 4 and correspondence in the agenda packets that has been obtained regarding the stormwater issue. 5 In addition, Isom noted that he had spoken with Ms. Kate Drewry, District Administrator, Rice 6 Creek Watershed District, since her last letter of April 25, 2000. 7 As an aside, Isom stated that the District is operated by a Board of Managers and that regular 8 meetings are held. 9 Isom stated that one of the conditions for the Apache project is that the project be in compliance with 10 the Rice Creek Watershed District. In this regard,Isom would discuss this issue with City Attorney 11 Soth. 12 Hanson asked Isom if he envisioned that the City should be working more directly with the Rice 13 Creek Watershed District as opposed to individual businesses. Isom noted that in correspondence 14 from Mr.Jones,he had suggested that a letter from the City directed to Rice Creek might spark some 15 action. From a Staff's standpoint, Isom felt that would be helpful. In other words, if the City has 16 a position and submitted that standpoint to the Rice Creek Watershed District,possibly some action 17 could happen. . 18 Bergstrom inquired if that letter was in the process of being developed. Isom said not at this point; 19 however,he would take the discussion at the Planning Commission meeting today as a direction to 20 move forward. 21 Bergstrom commended Isom on the excellent summary and collection of historical materials and 22 background information on this issue. 23 IX. COMMISSION INPUT. 24 1. Action Item. Commission to review proposed amendment to zoning ordinance requiring a 25 minimum of three (3) acres for a Planned Unit Development(Ordinance 2000-00). 26 27 Assistant City Manager Isom noted that the nature of this issue is if an applicant comes to the City 28 for rezoning,it would give the Commission and the Council the option to require a PUD designation 29 if the property in question exceeds three acres. This Ordinance was drafted at the recommendation 30 of City Attorney William Soth. 31 Motion by Thomas, second by Stille, to approve Ordinance 2000-00, an Ordinance Relating to 32 Rezoning; Permitting the City to Designate Property Being Rezoned as a Planned Unit Develop- 33 ment; Amending Sections 1665.03 of the City Code of Ordinances to Add a New Subd. 5. •34 Motion carried unanimously. 35 2. Commissioner Comments. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 58 May 16, 2000 Page 10 1 Hanson commented that he is concerned about the water quality of Silver Lake,but also mentioned 2 that the City cannot be put in a position to punish Hillcrest Development for wrongs that have 3 occurred in the past. There are other routes to correct those problems. Additionally, he is pleased 4 with Mr.Tankenoff's comments that Hillcrest plans on exceeding the standards imposed by the Rice 5 Creek Watershed District. 6 As a business owner, Hanson understands Hillcrest's position regarding the New Market Site and . 7 suggests that the Commission not back Hillcrest into a corner. 8 Thomas commented that he would suggest that the Planning Commission begin looking at programs 9 and policies to assist with renovating older homes. He would be able to provide some information 10 that he could share with the Commission and Staff. One suggestion would be to tie in the policies 11 with the point of sale ordinance that has been discussed, as well as tie in with some rehabilitation 12 programs that are available through the State. Thomas will gather information and make this 13 available to Staff to place as an agenda item on an upcoming Planning Commission meeting. 14 15 Additionally, Thomas believes the City has an excellent opportunity that fits the guidelines of the 16 Metropolitan Council Livable Cities and believes there is room and flexibility to accommodate 17 housing, redevelopment, and retail. • __ _ __ .- Melsha commented that he would like to see a copy of a form PUD agreement. He requested that Assistant City Manager Isom work with the City Attorney to obtain a form for the Commission's 18 review. 19 Melsha related that the prior Assistant City Manager,Ms.Kim Moore-Sykes,had mentioned certain 20 conditions on placement of antenna towers for wireless companies. He suggested the possibility of 21 placing a condition of sorts that would require different carriers to cooperate with each other so the 22 City could reduce the number of towers and antennas in the neighborhoods. 23 Bergstrom noted the flyer inserted into the Agenda packets that mentions the May 20, 2000 Town 24 Meeting. He also noted the mention of booths. He directed Assistant City Manager Isom to find 25 out the intent of the booths and more details as to whether the Planning Commission would be 26 required to have a booth. 27 Bergstrom received a letter from the VillageFest committee stating that the Planning Commission 28 is invited to participate in the parade. The parade will be held on Saturday,August 5,2000,and the 29 details will be discussed at later Planning Commission meetings. He requested that the Com- 30 missioners place the date on their calendars. 31 Thomas noted an excellent website for the Commissioners to view,called www.plannersweb.com. 0,2 Bergstrom noted that every year Hennepin County presents an annual report which provides a listing 33 of all the homes that have sold and the statistics of such sale. He planned on giving the report to 34 Assistant City Manager Isom and the Commissioners were welcome to contact Isom for a copy. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 16, 2000 Page 11 1 Hatch inquired about the progress of the green space at St. Anthony Shopping Center: Bergstrom 2 responded that he believed the project was with the Public Works Department and the Parks 3 Commission. 4 Stille commented that he believed the City was on the right track regarding the Rice Creek 5 Watershed District issue. But he believed that the enforcement issue would rest on the Watershed 6 District. Additionally, Stille noted that the City of Richfield has some successful programs re- . 7 garding watershed. 8 X. ADJOURNMENT. 9 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Melsha, to adjourn at 10:00 p.m. 10 Motion carried unanimously. 11 Respectfully submitted, 12 Sue Selseth •13 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • THERE IS NOT A PAGE 60. . 61 MEMORANDUM DATE: 5/9100 MEETING DATE: 5/16/00 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom ] RE: An Ordinance relating to zoning and planned unit developments; amending section 1655 of the St. Anthony Code of Ordinances in its entirety. The attached Ordinance#2000-006 is consistent with the May 4,2000 update of the critical path for planned unit development(PUD)ordinancelprocess and Hillcrest Development's redevelopment of the Apache Plaza. Said ordinance was drafted by the City's planning consultant(DSU)and subsequently edited by City Attorney Soth. Staff Reconvnendatlon: Motion to approve Ordinance#2000-006, as proposed. Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin • 62 • -_ .5/16/00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ORDINANCE 2000-006 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS; AMENDING SECTION 1655 OF THE ST. ANTHONY CODE OF ORDINANCES IN ITS ENTIRETY The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 1655 of the City Code is amended to read in full as follows: 1655.01 Purpose. The purpose of this Section 1655 is to provide for planned unit developments within the City. 1655.02 Definitions. Subd. 1.PUD. A PUD is a zoning district and development plan which may include single or • mixed uses, and one or more lots or parcels, and which is intended to create a more flexible, creative and efficient approach to the use of land. Any PUD shall be subject to the procedures, standards and regulations contained in this Section 1655. A PUD site must be at least 3 acres in size, and applications for PUD approval will not be considered for sites of less than 3 acres. Subd. 2 Development Review Committee. The Development Review Committee shall be a committee as appointed by the City Manager from time to time to conduct a review-of all development plans for any PUD.. Subd. 3 Sketch Plan. A Sketch Plan means an informal development plan presented by a PUD applicant as provided in Section 1655.10, Subd. 2. Subd. 3 Preliminaa Development Plan. A Preliminary Development Plan-means a formal development plan in preliminary form presented by a PUD applicant as provided in Section 1655.10, Subd. 3, and including the requirements set forth in Section 1655.10, Subd. 5(b). Subd. 4 Final Development Plan. A Final Development Plan means a final development plan based upon the Preliminary Development Plan and presented by a PUD applicant as provided in Section 1655.10, Subd. 4, and including the requirements set forth in Section 1655.10,. Subd. 5(b)(4). • 63 • Subd. 5 Developer. Developer means the owner of the Property, or a person or entity authorized in writing by the owner of the Property to file the applications for the PUD and who will become the owner of the Property prior to any development of the Property. Subd. 6 Propegy. Property means all land included within the PUD. Subd. 7 PUD Agreement. The PUD Agreement is the agreement to be entered into between the Developer and the City to incorporate all term,requirements and conditions.of the PUD approval. 1655.03 Authorization. A PUD approval-may allow the following: Subd. 1. Vane . Within a comprehensive site design concept, a mixture of land uses,housing types and densities. Subd. 2. Sensitivity. Through the departure from the strict application of required setbacks, yard areas, lot sizes,minimum house sizes, minimum requirements and other performance standards associated with traditional zoning, a PUD can maximize the development potential of land while remaining sensitive to its unique and valuable natural characteristics. Subd. 3. Efficiency.The consolidation of areas for recreation and reductions in street lengths • and other utility-related expenses. Subd. 4. Density Transfer. The project density may be clustered,basing density on a number of units per acre in place of specific lot dimensions. Subd. 5. District Integration. The combination of uses which are allowed in separate zoning districts such as: (a) Mixed residential uses to allow both densities and unit types to be varied within the project. (b) Mixed residential uses with increased density based upon the greater sensitivity of PUD projects to regulation. (c) Mixed land uses with the integration of compatible land uses within the project. 1655.04 Allowed Uses. Uses within a PUD may include only those uses generally considered associated with the general land use category shown for the area on the official Comprehensive Land Use Plan. However, in some unique situations,the PUD may allow the approval of use or uses that are not listed as either permitted or conditional uses in any underlying zoning district. The specific allowed —2— 64 uses and performance standards for each PUD shall be delineated in an ordinance and development plan. The PUD development plan shall identify all the proposed land uses,which shall become permitted uses if the Final Development Plan is approved. Any change in the uses presented in the Final Development Plan will be considered an amendment to the PUD and must follow the procedures specified in this Section_;1655. 1655.05 Required Standards. The City shall consider a proposed PUD from the point of view of all standards and purposes of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to achieve a maximum coordination between the proposed development and the surrounding uses,the conservation of woodlands and wetlands, and the protection of health, safety and welfare of the community and residents of the PUD. To these ends, the City Council shall consider the location of the buildings, compatibility, parking areas and other features with respect to the topography of the area and.existing natural features such as streams and large trees; the efficiency, adequacy and safety of the proposed layout of internal streets and driveways; the adequacy and location of green areas; the adequacy, location and screening of parking areas; and such other matters as the City Council may find to have a material bearing upon the stated standards and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 1655.06 Coordination With Subdivision Regulations. If a PUD involves the subdivision of land,then the subdivision review shall be carved out under Chapter 15 of this Code simultaneously with the review of the PUD. The plans required under this Section 1655'shall be submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements of Chapter 15 for the preliminary plat and final plat. • 1655.07 Revisions and/or Changes. Subd. 1. Minor Changes in Location Placement and Height. Minor changes in the location, placement and height of structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if required by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen at the time the final plan was approved and filed with the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 2. Significant Changes in Use Location, Size and Height. Changes in uses, significant changes in location, size, or height of structures, any rearrangement of lots,blocks and building tracts, changes in provision of common open spaces and all other changes to the approved Final Development Plan may be made only after a public hearing conducted by the Planning Commission. Upon determination by the Development Review Committee that a major change has been proposed,the Developer shall apply for an amended PUD.The application to amend the PUD shall be treated as a new zoning application. Upon acceptance of a complete application,the Planning Commission shall hold a hearing as set forth in Section 115 of this Code entitled"Public Hearings". Any changes shall be recorded as amendments to the recorded copy of the Final Development Plan • -3- 65 • Subd. 3. Provisions of Original District Apply. All of the provisions of the zoning district within which the PUD is established shall apply to the-amended PUD except as otherwise provided in approval of the Final Development Plan. The effective date of the PUD shall be after: (a) Approval of the PUD amendment and text and Final Development Plan. (b) Publication of the ordinance. Subd. 4. Review. If substantial development has not occurred within a reasonable time after approval of the PUD,the City Council may instruct the Planning Commission to initiate rezoning to the original zoning district. It shall not be necessary for the City Council to find that the rezoning was in error. Subd. 5. Formal Review Periods. Within the PUD Agreement,the City may schedule formal City Council review periods on an annual or less frequent basis to ascertain that actual development on the site meets the conditions of the approved PUD. 1655.08 Phasing and Guarantee of Performance. Subd. 1. Comparison with Approved Development Schedule. The Planning Commission shall compare the actual development accomplished in the various portions of the PUD.with the -approved development schedule. Subd. 2. Extension of Limits of Development Schedule. Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and for good cause shown by the Developer,the City Council may extend the limits of the development schedule. Subd. 3. Construction Rates of Dwelling and Open Space. The construction and provision of all of the common open space and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the Final Development Plan must proceed at the same rate as the construction of dwelling units, if any. The Development Review Committee shall review all of the building permits issued for the PUD and examine the construction which has taken place on the site. If they find that the rate of construction of dwelling units is greater than the rate at which common open spaces and public and recreational facilities have been constructed and provided,they shall forward this information to the City Council for action. Subd. 4. Security. A letter of credit in form acceptable to the City shall be required to guarantee performance by the Developer. The amount of the letter of credit and the specific elements of the development program that it is intended to guarantee will be stipulated in the PUD Agreement. • -4- 66 • 1655.09 Control of PUD Following Completion. Subd. 1. Final Development Plan Governs. After a certificate of occupancy has been issued for all or any portion of a PUD,the use of the land covered by the certificate of occupancy and the construction, modification and alteration of any buildings or structures.within the PUD shall be governed by the Final Development Plan. . Subd. 2. Chanizes After Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. After a certificate of occupancy has been issued for all or any portion of a PUD, no changes shall be made in the approved Final Development Plan except upon application as provided below: (a) Any minor extensions, alterations or modifications of existing buildings or structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if they are consistent with the purposes and intent of the Final Development Plan.No change authorized by this Section may increase the mass or volume of any building or structure by more than 10%. '(b) Any building or structure that is totally or substantially destroyed may be reconstructed only in compliance with the Final Development Plan unless an amendment to the Final Development Plan is approved under this Section 1655. (c) Changes in the use of the common open spaces may be authorized by an amendment.to the Final Development Plan by the City Planning Commission after a public hearing as provided in Section 115 of this Code and without all the documents necessary for the original application. (d) Any other changes in the Final Development Plan must:be authorized by an amendment of the Final Development Plan under this Section 1655. 1655.10 Procedure for Processins a PUD. Subd. 1. Application Conference. Upon filing of an application for a PUD,the Developer shall arrange for and attend a conference with the Development Review Committee. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the Developer with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of Developer's proposal for the area for which it is proposed and its conformity to the provisions of this Section 1655 before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. Subd. 2. Sketch Plan. The sketch plan provides an opportunity for an applicant to submit an informal plan to the City showing the applicant's basic intent and general nature of the -5- 67 • development. The sketch plan is optional and is intended to provide feedback from the Planning Commission before the applicant incurs substantial cost in the preparation of formal plans. The Sketch Plan shall be considered a partial, incomplete application prior to formal submittal of the complete application and scheduling of hearings. Subd. 3. PrelimingbYDevelopment Plan. The purpose of a Preliminary Development Plan is to. formally present a PUD application, and a preliminary plat application if subdivision of land is a part of the PUD, in a public hearing before the Planning Commission as set forth in Section 115 of this Code. The plan shall include the following: '(a) Overall maximum PUD density range. (b) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. (c) General location and extent of public and common and open space. (d) General location of residential and nonresidential land uses with approximate type of intensities of development. (e) Staging and time schedule of development. • (f) Other special criteria for development. Subd. 4. Final Development Plan. Following approval of the Preliminary Development Plan, the applicant shall submit an application for the Final Development Plan, and a final plat if subdivision of land is a part of the PUD. The application shall proceed and be acted upon in accordance with 1655.03 for zoning district changes.'If appropriate,because of the limited scale of the proposal, the Development Review Committee may permit the Preliminary Development Plan and Final Development Plan to proceed through the review and approval processes simultaneously. Subd. 4. Procedures. The procedures to be followed by the applicant with respect to a PUD, shall be as follows: (a) Schedule: (1) Developer shall meet with the Development Review Committee to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The Developer shall file the Preliminary Development Plan application and preliminary plat, if any,together with all supporting data. • -6- 68 (3) Within 30 days after verification by the City Manager that the required plan and • supporting data is adequate,the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing as provided for in Section 115 of this Code. (4) The Planning Commission shall conduct,the hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to.the City Council. The procedure shall be that set forth in Section 115 of this Code. (5) The City may request additional information from the Developer concerning operational factors or retain expert testimony at the expense of the Developer concerning operational factors. (6) If the Planning Commission fails to take action on the matter on or before a date 14 days after the initial hearing,then the City Council may proceed as provided for in Section 115 of this Code without the Planning Commissions recommendation. The City Council shall assign an ordinance numerical reference to each Final Development Plan and PUD Agreement text approved. The City Council may attach such additional conditions as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the entire City Council. After approval by the City Council,the PUD zoning ordinance map amendment shall be published, with reference made to the PUD Agreement text. The Developer shall.be responsible for recording.the ordinance and PUD agreement in the office of the Hennepin or Ramsey County Recorder and/or Registrar of Titles prior to issuance of any building permit or within 60 days, whichever is less. The official PUD ordinance and PUD Agreement shall also be filed in the City Manager's office. (b) Application: An application for PUD approval must be signed by all landowners of the property included in the PUD and filed with the City Clerk together with the application fee set forth in Section 615'. The application shall include 10 copies of the Preliminary Development Plan, including all of the following exhibits, analyses and plans. (1) Preliminary plat for any land being subdivided and information required by Chapter 15 of this Code. (2) General Information: A. The landowner's name, address and telephone number shall be included, together with a description of the nature of the landowner's ownership interest in the Property. • -7- 69 • B. If the Developer is a party other than the landowner,the Developer shall sign the application and the Developer's correct legal name, address and telephone number shall be included,together with a description of Developer's contractual interest in the Property. C. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of all professional consultants who have contributed or will contribute to the development of the PUD plan being submitted, including attorney, land planner, engineer and surveyor. D. Evidence that the Developer has sufficient control over the Property to effectuate the proposed PUD, including a statement of all legal, beneficial,tenancy and contractual interests held in or affecting the Property and including an up-to-date policy of title insurance (or commitment for title insurance) or registered property report, and such other evidence as the City Attorney may require to show the status of title or control of the Property. E. Evidence that the Property is.not less than 3 acres in area. .(3) Present Status: A. The address and legal description of the Property. B. The existing zoning classification and present use of the Property and all lands within 1,000 feet of the Property. C. A map depicting the existing development of the Property and all land within 1,000 feet thereof and indicating the location of existing streets, property lines, easements,water mains and storm and sanitary sewers, with invert elevations on and within 100 feet of the Property. D. A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD.and the market which it is intended to serve and its demand showing its relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged and operated in order to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the City. E. Site Conditions: Graphic reproductions of the existing site conditions at a scale of one inch equals 100 feet. • -8- 7® • 1. Contours; minimum two-foot intervals. 2. Area devoted to residential use by building type. 3. . Area devoted to common open space. 4. Area devoted to public open space. 5. Approximate area devoted to streets. 6. Approximate area devoted to, and number of, off-street parking and loading spaces and related access. 7. Approximate area and floor area devoted to commercial uses. 8. Approximate area and floor area devoted to industrial or office use. 9. Total area of the Property. F. When the PUD is to be constructed in stages during a period of time • extending beyond a single construction season, a schedule for the development of such stages or units shall be submitted stating the approximate beginning and completion date for each stage or unit and the proportion of the total PUD public or common open space and dwelling units to be provided or constructed during each stage and overall chronology of development to be followed from stage to stage. G. When the proposed PUD includes provisions for public or common open space or service facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities. H. Any restrictive covenants that are to be recorded with respect to Property included in the proposed PUD. I. Schematic utilities plans indicating placement of water, sanitary and storm sewers. • -9- 71 J. The City may excuse a Developer from submitting any specific item of information or document required in this stage which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration of the specific proposal. K. The City,may require the submission of any additional information or documentation which it may find necessary. (4) The Final Development Plan submission should depict and outline the proposed implementations of the Preliminary Development Plan for the PUD. Information from the Preliminary Development Plan may be included for background and to provide a basis for the submitted plan. The Final Development Plan submissions shall include, but not be limited to: A. A final plat for any land to be subdivided and information required by the Chapter 15 of this Code. B. Ten sets of preliminary plans drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals 100 feet(or other scale requested by the City Manager) containing at least the following information: 1. Proposed name of the development, which shall not duplicate nor be similar in pronunciation to the name of any plat previously recorded in the county where the Property is situated. 2. Property boundary lines and dimensions of the Property and any significant topographical or physical features of the Property. 3. The location, size use and arrangement including height in stories and feet and total square feet of ground area coverage and floor area of proposed buildings, including mobile homes, and existing buildings which will remain, if any. 4. Location, dimensions of all driveways, entrances, curb cuts, parking stalls, loading spaces and access aisles, and all other circulation elements including bike and pedestrian; and the total site coverage of all circulation elements. 5. Location, designation and total area of all common open space. -10- 72 6. Location,designation and total area proposed to be conveyed • - or dedicated for public open space, including parks, playgrounds, school sites and recreational facilities. 7. Proposed lots and blocks,if any and numbering system. 8. The location, use and size of structures and other land uses on adjacent properties. 9. Detailed sketches and provisions of proposed landscaping. 10. General grading and drainage plans for the developed PUD. 11. Any other information that may have been required by the Planning Commission or County Board in conjunction with the approval of the Preliminary Development Plan. C. An accurate legal description of the entire area within the PUD for which Final Development Plan approval is sought. D. A tabulation indicating the number of residential dwelling units and expected population. E. A tabulation indicating the gross square footage, if any, of commercial and industrial floor space by type of activity (e.g. drug store, dry cleaning, supermarket). F. Preliminary architectural "typical" plans indicating use, floor, plan, elevations and exterior wall finishes of proposed building, including mobile homes. G. A detailed site plan, suitable for recording, showing the physical layout, design and purpose of all streets, easements, rights of way, utility lines and facilities, lots,block,public and common open space, general landscaping plan, structure, including mobile homes, and uses. H. Preliminary grading and site-alteration plan illustrating changes to existing topography and natural site vegetation. The Final Development Plan should clearly reflect the site treatment and its conformance with the approved Preliminary Development Plan. • -11- 73 I. A final plat prepared in accordance with Chapter 15 if land is being • - subdivided. I A soil erosion control plan acceptable to watershed districts, Department of Natural-Resources, Soil Conservation Service, or any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in effect as of the date of its publication. First Reading: 'lGY %0 C 0 Second Reading: Adopted: • Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Published: St. Anthony Bulletin: • -12- 74 • IMPORTANT DATES St. Anthony Budget Schedule for 2001 Budget April 11, 2000 Preliminary Introduction with the City Council. Discuss Budget Goals for 2001/Review Estimated Revenues for 2001. April 25, 2000 Public Hearing for Citizens to Communicate 2001 Suggestions. (Department Heads will be present). April - May City Manager& Staff Meetings to discuss Budget Revisions from April 25'h Meeting. July 25, 2000 City Council Afternoon Work Session(3:00 PM to 6:00 PM ) to Discuss Proposed Budget. Regular Council Meeting at 7:00 PM. August 8, 2000 Proposed Budget is Presented to the City Council. (Overview for Council and Community). September 12, 2000 1) Resolution passed setting Proposed 2001 Tax Levy and Budget 2) Resolution passed setting Public Hearing and reconvening dates. 3) Passage of resolution authorizing a Tax Rate Increase for Collectible Year 2001 Tax Levy. October 31, 2000 Staff provides City Council with Tax Capacity & Proposed Tax Rate Impact. November 29, 2000 ***** December 21, 2000 City must conduct a public hearing, which cannot conflict with Hennepin County, Ramsey County, Independent School District #282 or the Special Taxing Districts hearing dates. December 2000 Public Hearing Date and announcement of second Public Hearing for reconvening/passage of the 2001 final Tax Levy. December 2000 Reconvening Hearing Date and/or Public Hearing date for adoption of 2001 Tax Levy by resolution. *****Please note: The public hearing must be held between November 29th and December 18th. The City's initial public hearing cannot be held on the same.day as Hennepin or Ramsey Counties Initial Hearing Dates, I.S.D. #282 Initial Hearing Date or Metro Special Taxing Districts Hearing Date. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION DOCUMENTS Update of Critical Path for Apache PUD Update of Critical Path for Apache TIF Notice to Residents of Neighborhood Meeting- 29t`' Avenue NE Update on Sump Pump Program • 1/1 Reduction Program Rice Creek Watershed District - Storm Water Management Plan Report on General Fund to Actual Storm Water Fund - 4/30/00 Investment Portfolio - 4/30/00 — MEMORANDUM DATE: 5/15/00 TO: City Manager Momson FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom` RE: UPDATE OF THE CRTTI AL PATH FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ORDINANCE/PROCESS AND HILLCREST DEVELOPMENT'S REDEVELOPMENT OF APACHE PLAZA PROPERTY To date the"Critical Path"is amended as follows: Critical Path/Important Dates Target Complete Task 4/18/00 4/18/00 Planning Commission meeting. Commission approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Commission to ask Hillcrest to withdraw their request for zoning map change and zoning code amendment. 4/25/00 4/25/00 City Council meeting. Council to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. 4/27/00 4/26/00_ Planning Consultant.' Consultant to submit "Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment"to Metropolitan Council. Planning Consultant to facilitate the approval of said amendment. 5/2/00 5/2/00 Planning Commission work session. Commission to hold work session with Planning Consultant,staff,and Hillcrest to discuss the draft PUD ordinance and process. 5/9/00 5110100 Planning Consultant. Consultant to submit fuial PUD ordinance and related forms, applications,etc.to staff. Said ordinance and related documents shall be"approved as to form"by City Attorney Soth. Additionally,Consultant to work with I illcrest to prepare them for the PUD process. 5/15/00 5/15/00 City Council work session. Council to hold work session with Planning Commission Representative,Planning Consultant,staff,and Hillcrest to discuss PUD ordinance and process. 5/16/00 - -- Planning Commission meeting. Commission to hear PUD ordinance. Commission, Consultant,and staff to hold/hear Hillcrest Development's"Application Conference" and"Sketch Plan." 5/23/00 ---- City Council meeting. City Council to hear the PUD ordinance(one reading). 6/6/00 ---- Planning Commission work session. Commission to hold work session with Planning Consultant,staff,and Hillcrest. i ---- 2 6/20/00 Planning Commission meeting. Commission to hear.(Public Hearing)"Preliminary Development Plan"(PUD/site specific)and make recommendations for approval or denial of said plan. Commission also to hear(Public Hearing)plan for Tax Increment Financing(TIF). 6/27/00 ---- City Council meeting. Council to hear Preliminary Development Plan (PUD/site specific). 7/18/00 ---- Planning Commission meeting. Commission to hear"Final Development Plan"for the Apache Plaza(building specific). 7/25/00 ---- City Counccl meeting. Council to hear Final Development Plan(building specific). Council to direct staff/Consultant to prepare findings of fact consistent with approval/ denial and to return with a final PUD agreement. 8/8/00 ---- City Council meeting. Council to approve findings of fact and PUD agreement. The Development Review Committee for this project is: Doug Bergstrom,John Shardlow,Bill Soth and me. John Shardlow is the point of contact for this project and is working with City Attorney Soth,Hillcrest,and staff to meet all target dates. It should be noted that the"Critical Path/Important Dates"may change depending on the outcomes of the Council and Commission meetings. Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin Planning Consultant Shardlow . City Attorney Soth MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17, 2000 . TO: Mayor and Councilmembers Spencer Isom, Assistant City Manager FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager ITEM: CRITICAL PATH/IMPORTANT DATES FOR APACHE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING - UPDATE Target Complete Task 4/27/00 4/27/00 City Manager meets with Jerry Gilligan, Dorsey & Whitney, and Bob Thistle, Springsted, Inc., to review tax increment financing (TIF) request from Hillcrest Development. 5/2/00 5/2/00 City Manager, Gilligan, Thistle meet with development team to discuss.TIF request with Hillcrest. 5115100 5115100 Work session with City Council. 5/17/00 Letter sent to Ramsey County on TIF plan. 6/13/00 City Council/Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) calls f6r'a public hearing on new TIF'District and decertify old TIF District. Review business terms with Hillcrest. 6/14/00 City notifies School Board and County Boards about new TIF District. 7/12/00 Notice of 7/25 hearing faxed to St. Anthony Bulletin. 7/12/00 Notice of 7/25 hearing published in Bulletin. 6/20/00 Planning Commission reviews TIF plan and makes recommendation to Council. 6/27/00 Public hearing to adopt business subsidy policy. . 7/25/00 Three public hearings by Council: (1) new TIF District (2) decertify parcels from existing District (3) specific business subsidy agreement with Hillcrest 8/8/00 Approve developers agreement and business subsidy agreements with Hillcrest .. �:J"`n tho�y ilia e C� To: Residents of 29'Avenue From: Michael Mornson, City Manager St.Anthony Village,MN Date: May 16, 2000 Re: 2000 Street Reconstruction Improvements The St. Anthony Village City Council authorized and received a feasibility study for improvements to 29'' Avenue from Stinson Boulevard to County Road 88. This project includes the installation of storm sewer, sanitary sewer,watermain, and new street and curb. In addition, it is anticipated that the City Council will act at their May 23 meeting in regard to additional items for installation, including: sidewalk, decorative lighting,and landscaping. As construction is anticipated to start sometime after Memorial Day,a neighborhood meeting to discuss your road improvements has been scheduled for Thursday, May 25,2000,at 8:15 p.m., in the council chambers at St. Anthony City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road. Attached is a tentative agenda for this meeting. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 789-8881. 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING AGENDA May 25,2000 8:15 p.m. 1. Introduction(sign-in sheets). 2. City process for road improvements. 3. Improvements to be made and what to expect. >Construction time >Driveway improvement >Boulevard restoration >Utility improvements >Other issues 4. Estimates of improvement cost. 5. How is it paid for- special assessments. 6. Questions. 7 Adjourn. F.•I W7900CS1051500-agm wpd 8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350 B.A.Mitt.Weiss,P.E. WSB Bret A.Weiss,P.E. Minneapolis, MN 55426 peter R.willenbring,P.E. Donald W.Sterna,P.E. tel: 763-541 74800 Ronald B.Bray,P.E. &Associates, Inc. fax: 763-541-1700 May 2, 2000 Mr. Mike Morrison City of St Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 Re: Sump Pump Program WSB Project No. 1065-42 Dear Mr. Morrison: The purpose of this letter is to provide an update on the status of the sump pump program. We are currently working with the City staff to develop a series of newsletter articles and some informational "inserts" for other city mailings. In May we will prepare some options for the Council to consider for providing financial assistance to the residents that are willing to remove existing four>_dation drain tiles. After the program is reviewed and approved by the Council we will hold one or two (depending on interest) informational meetings to present the program L-o local residents. We anticipate that some construction will occur by late summer and into the fall months. Some flow improvements may be noticeable during the fall wet weather period or possibley by next spring depending on the amount of precipitation received during the year. Subsequent phases of the project will be re-evaluated following the results of the first year. If you have any additional questions or need additional details, please let us know. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Charles R J nski, P.E. Project ger cc: Mr. Jay Hartman, City of St. Anthony Mr. Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, Inc. jw M i n n e a p o l i s St . C l o u d Infrastructure Engineers Planners F.\WPWIM1065-42\042800-mm wpd EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ® 8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350 B.A.Mittelsteadt,P.E. W Minneapolis, MN 55426 Bret A.Weiss,P.E. Peter R.Willenbring,P.E. - Donald W.Sterna,P.E. tel: 763-541-4800 Ronald B.Bray,PE. &Associates, Inc. fax: 763-541-1700 May 16, 2000 Mr. Michael Morrison Manager City of St Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 Re: Infiltration/h►flow Reduction Program Residential Assistance Program Ideas WSB Project No. 1065-42 Dear Mr. Mornson: As part of the overall I/I.reduction program we would recommend that the City Council consider some type of an incentive program to encourage voluntary installation of sump pumps. The recent I/I study concluded that there are a large number of direct drain tile or passive type basement protection systems.- These systems collect the groundwater flow outside the foundation wall or below, the basement floor and direct it to the sanitary sewer system. Once the flow is mixed with the wastewater it becomes contaminated and must be treated. However before mixing, the water is basically clean and it could be pumped out to the ground surface. This type of direct connection can be difficult to identify and difficult to correct. Correction requires breaking a hole in the basement floor, installing a sump basket and sump pump, patching the floor, and sealing the old drain tile connection. The sump pump is electrical and it may be necessary to install a new electrical outlet to provide power near the pump location. The pump discharge line is extended up and out of the basement through'the foundation wall to the exterior ground surface. The water can be used to "water"plants, shrubs, trees, etc. or discharged to the street. In areas where there are significant numbers of street discharges it may be necessary to extend segments of drain tile to carry the flow to a nearby catch basin. In anticipation of a program to disconnect the drain tiles, several plumbers were contacted to determine the potential cost of the work. The estimates ranged from $1,200 to $2,000, but each location will be unique and it is difficult to reliably predict the cost. M i n n e a p o l i s S t . C l o u d Infrastructure Engineers Planners EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Mr. Michael Mornson City of St Anthony May 16, 2000 Page 2 The type of work involved and the anticipated cost of the work both tend to discourage residents from having the work done. In order to encourage participation in a voluntary program, the City could offer some incentives. A basic assistance program could include preparing a list of plumbers that have expressed an interest in doing the work, and assisting the resident in.reviewing and evaluating the various bids on the work. Additional assistance that could be considered include: 1. The City could purchase the pumps and provide them directly to the plumber for a specific project. This is an easy thing to do but may bring liability on the City if there is a pump failure or other problem. 2. The City could provide a $1,000 loan for the work and collect installment payments with the sewer and water billing. A $1,000 loan financed with no interest and a 5-year term would add about $17.00 per month to the individual water/sewer bill. City ost — Assuming 100 connections will be corrected each year for period of Y g p 3 years, and the cost of the program will be financed by the City at a 5 percent interest rate, the overall cost to the City would be about $50,000 but the cash flow would require about $200,000, of in debtedness according to the following schedule. Year Construction Cost Interest Income End of Year (Bond) (5%) @$17/mo Cash Balance 1 100,000 5,000 20,400 ($84,600) 2 100,000 9,230 40,800 ($153,030) 3 100,000 12,652 61,200 ($204,480) 4 . . 10,224 61,200 ($153,510) 5 7,675 61,200 . ($99,975) 6 5,000 40,800 ($64,170) 7 3,209 20,400 ($46,980) ------------------------------------------------:------------------- -------------------------------- Total Resident Cost $306 ,000 -- Total City Cost -- $46,980 FAWPWIM106542\051600-mm 2 Mr. Michael Morrison City of St Anthony May 16, 2000 Page 3 3. The City could provide outright assistance grants that would be payable upon completion of the work and inspection by City staff. City Cost — Assuming that a total of 300 residents would participate in the program, the City cost would be $30,000 per $100 of grant money offered. A typical high quality sump pump will cost $100 to $150. All of these programs must be considered for their individual environment benefit in reducing sewer backups and downstream bypassing of raw sewage to the Mississippi River. The City of St. Anthony will realize some savings from the MCES treatment costs due to the reduced flow, but it is very difficult to predict how much flow reduction will actually be achieved and therefore how much savings there will be in treatment charges. It should be recognized that the savings in treatment charges will be realized over a period of many years, and small improvements in each community's system can provide a measurable improvement in a sanitary sewer collection system as large as the one serving the Metropolitan area. We would recommend that the City encourage voluntary removal of the direct tile g connections and any sump pump connections, with mandatory disconnection or sealing required at times of property ownership transfer. A widespread mandatory program with the type of connection that exists in St. Anthony would be extremely difficult and confrontational to accomplish, and the long-term effectiveness is extremely questionable. If you have any questions on the information in this letter or if there are any additional ideas to encourage.participation, please let us know. Sincerely, WSB & Associates Inc. Charles J ki, P.E. Project E neer bba F:%wrwm\1065-42%051600-= 3 05/17/2000 15:23 651-766-4196 RICE CREEK W DIST PAGE 01 Z F- _ D 1 11' Westwood Professional Services.Inc. , 6 E 94 -11 = MAY 1 7 2000 u May 12,2000 RICE CREEI< WA►ERSN;;Q DiiSTRICTA 7599 Anagramprivc • �I� � : cI� `3./^M""j( /1/VIA��If ,Edon Praint,h1N 55334 Ms.Kate Drewry vnnee:612.971•!1!0 District Administrator Pay:612.937.5822 Rice Creek Watershed District ® Ton Email:W 5.We3tV 7.5150 Email:wps�Flwestwoadps.tom 3585 Lexington Avenue North,Suite 330 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55126-8056 FAG RE: RCWD PERMIT#96-11 APACRE PLAZA/SILVER LAKE CENTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ' PHSP G,S r- .. fAXIF�r.e.v Dear Ms. Drewry: I have reviewed your letter of April 25,2000 regarding the drainage at Apache Plaza and have discussed these issues with Mr. Larry McCabe of the Ste.Marie Company. As requested in your letter of November 24, 1999,we have completed a site survey and field review of existing conditions with RCWD staff to determine probable source of the problem and potential solutions. As we have discussed, it appears from these efforts that the site conditions remain essentially as constructed and there have been no modifications or settlements since release of the District permit which might have led to alteration of the drainage patterns. In other words, the site conditions remain as reviewed and accepted by the RCWD upon completion of construction. The jurisdictional issues not withstanding,the Ste.Marie Company has expressed a desire to find a final resolution of these issues as simply and expeditiously as possible. Based upon my meeting with RCWD staff on February 18' of this year I understand the following to be reasonable proposals for resolving these issues: 1) The Ste.Marie Company will install a concrete trench drain in the Cub Foods access drive along the north property line of the development. This.-trench drain will serve to intercept. runoff from the parking lot that currently bypasses the existing drainage system and route the runoff to the existing storm water pond. This approach should address items 2 &3 in Derek Knapp's memorandum of November 10, 1999. A site plan and details of this installation are attached for your review and approval. This work will be completed within ninety days of RCWD approval subject to the Ste.Marie Company's ability to obtain right of entry from the property owner. 2) The resolution of the areas adjacent to the Erickson Oil site is slightly more problematic in that a previous correction undertaken with RCVD approval has now been deemed inadequate. This is the basis of items 1 &4 in Derek Knapp's memo. Based upon a field review of the existing conditions with RCWD staff it is my opinion that the most effective method of limiting by-pass runoff to the in-place drainage structures would be to modify the roadway surface of 39th Ave.extended. This driveway currently has adverse slope and crown that directs runoff that does not reach the gutter away from the catch basins. This condition existed prior to the re-development project and the 391"Ave extension was not part the re-platting or re-development. 05/17/2000 15:23 651-766-4196 RICE CREEK W DIST PAGE 02 Ms.Kate Drewry May 12,2000 Page 2 _ The corrective action is assumed to consist of placement of a bituminous overlay of the existing pavement..There is the potential however,that a redevelopment or refurbishment of the balance of the old Apache site may require considerable alteration of the existing parking and vehicular access in this area and would therefore logically address this issue under a RCWD permit. This property remains under the ownership of the Ste.Marie Company and is currently under contract for sale. Ste. Marie Company has included language in the pending purchase agreement that would bind the purchaser to rectify the situation to the District's satisfaction in the event a RCWD permit is required in connection with the purchaser's plans for the site. If this approach does not result in corrective action or obligation satisfactory to the District before June 1,2001 then the Ste.Marie Company will construct a bituminous overlay as described above. Of course,if the purchaser is required to obtain a permit from RCWD in connection with its plans for the site,Ste.Marie Company will not be required to do any corrective work on 39`'Street. Ste.Marie Company does not hereby admit that it has any legal liability,to do this remedial work. but in the interests of resolving this problem,has proposed to do the foregoing. I believe this reflects our discussions and understanding of the most practical approach to resolving these issues. Please contact me if you have any questions. - Sincerely, OOD PROPES NAL SERVICES,INC.. Bruce G.Miller,P.E. Principal Attachments cc Lamy McCabe David Greening DWY OOCUM£NTM9&3&APACH£PLAV%5.11.00-DOC 05/17/2000 15:.23 651-766-4196 RICE CREEK W DIST PAGE 03 38 L.F.— TRENCH DRAIN 10 L.F.— 8" PVC SDR 35 NEENAH NO. R-4990—CX I.E. (N) = —1.51 OR APPROVED EQUAL I.E. S) _ —1.6' ' A A 1.0 CU. YD. RIP'RAP CL. 2 � W/GEOTEXTILE FABRIC O) r- Co f 4 � N I � Q � C14 ON I ° Co N HWL=951.0 I r l Co ' NWL=948.0 ` I O I I I BOTTOM=940.0 o I o � Q 5 WCUT BITUMINOUS SCALE: 1"=30 i °0 PROJECT NAME: � 1lYwstwavc!professional Services,Inc APACHE PLAZA SHEE1 ' # 73f9MWamWM DRAINAGE CORRECTIONS c VEdtn Pratr*MN SSW PI1aRS 9Smmiso rac 97f/ii .$W w . .T • T 1/ 1v •II►1►1 05/17/2000 15:23 . 651-766-4196 RICE CREEK W DIST PAGE 04 INP. FENCE (PROTECT) INP. C&G REMOVE . AS REQUIRED INP. C&G (PROTECT) i I.E.=-1.0' I.E. —1.5' 38 L.F. -- TRENCH DRAIN 10 L.F. — 8" PVC SOR 0 1.00% 1.0 CU. Y0, RIPRAP CL. 2 W/GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (PROFILE SCALE: 1"=10' t 36" 6" 6, 12 WIN "a. 6 SAWCUT (TYP) �n 0 a a NEENAH CASTING INP. BIT. SURFACE a NO. R--4990—CX OR APPROVED 10" a EQUAL N $� = INP. AGG. BASE 0 5" (MIN) PVC 0 N #4 0 8" O.C.(EA. WAY) IN u� UNDISTURED SOIL (TYP) 3 z v � u �. SECTION A-A SCALE: N.T.S. M PROJECT NAME: o Westwood Professional Services,Inc. APACHE PLAZA SHEET: 5 7s"N1•gramave DRAINAGE CORRECTIONS i&n Prairie,MN SS3" G one.044/931.5150 FA=292M7•St22 w....T • ITUA►IV ,1 AI AI 05/17/2000 15:23 651-766-4196 RICE CREEK W DIST PAGE 05 1 't I I P'mo C i Nw1-91.00 60TTOYa94100 i mi ii u-n h,"4 ITI 1-1-11111111 u Y • a J FA BITUMINOUS OVERLAY J ' - Wily ratemm1 pN Doc. Na 1W664J — � h '�•• d7 JJ SCALE: t"=100' PROJECT NAME: 7 .W*stwood Professional Services,Inc. APACHE PLAZA SHEET- 7- 75"=m DRAINAGE CORRECTIONS Edon Prairie.RAN SU" Phone:252!937-5150Fw957/937.M2 SAINT ANTHONY MINN. 2000 General Fund Budget to Actual Report: Expenditures: Mean Average 33% 04/30/2000 Percentage Remaining Budget (1 T-D Balance SP9Ilt Budge� Mayor/Council $58,000.00 $26,375.67 $31,624.33 45% 55% Intergovernmental Relations $17,450.00 $3,287.53 $14,162.47 19% 81% Cable Franshise $20,500.00 $13,668.82 $6,831.18 67% 33% General Management $114,400.00 $47,336.91 $67,063.09 41% 59% Elections $22,800.00 $3,198.85 $19,601.15 14% 86% Finance/Insurance $271,700.00 $46,796.52 $224,903.48 17% 83% Finance/Assessing $37,000.00 $898.13 $36,101.87 2% 98% Legal $59,800.00 $14,242.73 $45,557.27 24% 76% Engineering/Planning/Zoning $9,100.00 $375.10 $8,724.90 4% 96% City Buildings $98,900.00 $16,291.34 $82,608.66 16% 84% Civil Defense $40,900.00 $12,269.84 $28,630.16 30% 70% Police Protection $1,010,700.00 $299,681.39 $711,018.61 30% 70% Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $474,300.00 $141,026.54 $333,273.46 30% 70% Fire Protection $494,300.00 $154,257.33 $340,042.67 31% 69% Inspections/Building Permits $66,300.00 $13,371.48 $52,928.52 20% 80% Animal Control $5,700.00 $520.04 $5,179.96 9% 91% Public Works $420,700.00 $95,298.77 $325,401.23 23% 77% Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $117,400.00 $25,992.86 $91,407.14 22% 78% Tree and Weed Care $30,700.00 $4,418.42 $26,281.58 14% 86% Parks $81,800.00 $23,066.24 $58,733.76 28% 72% Transfers to other Funds $75,000.00 $18,750.00 $56,250.00 5% 75% Total Expenditures $3,527,450.00 $961,124.51 $2,566,325.49 27% 73% Stormwater Fund#702 04/30/2000 Projeted Revenues: Funding Source Revenues-to-Date Street Improvement Bonds $1,700,000.00 $420,152.55 MSA Bonds $400,000.00 $0.00 DNR $3,540,000.00 $1,834,032.97 FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00 Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Storm Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $380,081.60 Storm Sewer City Bonds. $1.540.000.00 $0.00 Total Project Budget $8,530,000.00 $3,484,267.12 Other Project Activity: State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27 Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $3,516.75 Met Council $20,000.00 $5,000.00 Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00 Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $29,457.95 Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work $0.00 $26.035.87 Total Revenues $8,656,000.00 $3,673,032.96 04/30/2000 Expenditures: Expenditures-to-Date WSB-Engineering Services $327,643.75 Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35 Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $23,619.19 Purchase of Flood Homes $936,623.13 Flood Relief Grant Program $50,386.30 Private Homes-Dumpsters $1,774.15 Sump Pump $246.64 1999 Street Improvement Project $1,007,972.77 2000 Street Improvement Project $102,153.53 Richard Knutson, Inc-Silver Point Park $1.441.981.41 Total Expenditures $3,895,110.22 Project Balance -$222,077.26 Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted .$183,178.70 Total Cash on Hand -$38,898.56 EXPENDITURE REPORT 04130/2000 WSB: Flood Relief Grant Program: Project Description:. Expenditures Project Description: Exnendhures Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 DennWPenny Gault $10,000.00 Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek $10,000.00 Stonnwater Task Force $29,243.00 Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE $5,280.00 Storrnwater Engineering $20,557.86 Castle Building&Remodeling-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00 Flood Problem Analysis $27,178.98 L.N.Soding-3460 Penrod Lane $600.00 MCES Grant Application $1,475.25 J&D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00 DNR/FEMA Grants $6,261.00 St.Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00 Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 RlteWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue $390.00 Park Design $147,090.10 Pine Cone Nursery-3460 Penrod Lane $9,222.80 Harding Street Design $27,009.13 Twin Cities Glass Block-2521 W.Armour Terrace $292-50 1/1 Study $19,844.50 Total Flood Relief Program $50,386.30 Flood Grant-1998/1999/2000 $21-177.50 Total WSB $327,643.75 Private Homes-Dumpsters Barr Engineering: Project Description: Project Description: Waste Management $391.65 District#6 Watershed Study $2.709.35 Nancy Myhran $259.50 Total Barr Engineering $2,709.35 Linda Gonier $198.00 Susan Kozarek $925.00 . Dorsey&Whitney: Total Dumpsters $1,774.15 Project Description: Legal Services for Flooding Issues $17,696.16 Legal Services-Comdenation of Homes $1,930.00 Sump Pump Legal Services-Harding Street $1,252.80 Project Description: Legal Services-Pahl Avenue $2.740.23 Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Line $131.00 Total Dorsey&Whitney $23,619.19 Lillie Suburban.News-Advertisement $11564 Total Sump Pump/Mlsc. $246.64 Purchase of Homes: Project Description: 1999 Street Improvement Project Network Idle,Inc. $255.00 Project Description: Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 WSB-Engineering Services $169,117.77 Demolition $9,156.00 Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85 Taxes $839.61 Northdaie Construction $816,772.32 Legal Services-Dorsey&Whitney $225.00 Treemendous $460.00 Check for Asbestos-Abatement Services $365.00 Moody's Investment Services $3,250.00 Seal&Cap Well $1,450.00 Dorsey 8 Whitney $2,911.55 Purchase of 2713 St.Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 Bond Issuance Expense $7-625-28 Demolition $11,258.00 Total 1999 Street Project $1,007,972.77 Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Recording Deed/Taxes $2,506.98 2000 Street Improvement Project Title Insurance $946.00 Project Description: Seat&Cap Well $1,420.00 WSB-Engineering Services $92,046.34 Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,067.10 Buchen Environmental Services $2,248.99 Purchase of 2700/2704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45 Lillie Suburan Newspaper/Construction Bulletin $232.93 Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $205,528.49 Bond Issuance Expense $7.625.27 First American Title $375.00 Total 2000 Street Project $102,153.53 Evergreen Land Services $3.369-47 Total Purchase of Homes $936,623.13 Silver Point Park/Construction Project Description: Richard Knutson,Inc, $339,159.22 Richard Knutson,Inc, $300,593.77 Richard Knutson,Inc, $130,084.79 Richard Knutson,Inc, $305,667.27 Richard Knutson,Inc, $56,486.88 Richard Knutson,Inc, $50,176.49 Richard Knutson,Inc, $140,028.70 Richard Knutson,Inc, $109,601.19 Tritium Park $10.163-10 Total Payments to Contractors $1,441,981.41 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: 04/3012000 Interest Date FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK Bale Purchased MaturilX Book Value INVESTMENT DEMAND-MONEY MARKET SAVINGS 5.41% 1 DAY LIQUIDITY(SWEEP)- $549,326.21 4/4/ GENERAL $377,000 TRANSAMERICA CAPITAL COMM 5.89% 02/23/00 06/21100 $369,896.69 $386,000 FORRESTAL FUND COMM PAPER 5.95% 04/17100 08/18100 $378,152.94 $500,000 FNMA MED TERM NOTE 8.046% 08/10/99 08/18/14 $153,150.00 $500,000 FHLB-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.000% 11/18/99 07/28/17 $124,800.00 $1,025,999.63 41M ARMY-WATER FILTRATION $200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. 6.010% 11/05/98 11/05/08 $200,000.00 $100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. 6.175% 12107/98 12/22/08 $100,000.00 $200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. 6.00% 12/21/98 06/23/04 $200,000.00 $100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 02/03/99 02124/14 $100,000.00 $200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 03103/99 03/03/14 $200,000.00 $100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.25% 03/09/99 03/24/14 $100,000.00 $ 45,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.20% 03/18/99 01/21/08 $45,000.00 $200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.50% 03/30/99 01/24/08 $200,000.00 $100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.15% 04/13/99 04/14/14 $100,000.00 $100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.46% 05112/99 01/08/08 $100,000.00 $200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 7.00% 06/04/99 05/06/14 $199,000.00 $137,000 F.H.L.B. STRIPS 6.38% 08/23/95 08/25/00 $100,060.69 $800,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 01/12/99 01/28/19 $202,057.98 $500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.20% 01/12199 01/28/19 $126,286.24 $500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 8.12% 09/09/99 07/14/17 $48,312.00 $190,000 MERRILL LYNCN COMM PAPER 6.07% 04/19/00 07/17/00 $187,228.64 $2,207,945.55 DAIN RAUSCHER-GENERAL $52,000 FICO STRIPPED COUPON 9.37% 6/22/90 12106/01 $19,891.31 $30,000 RFCO STRIPPED COUPON 9.22% 8/24/90 10/15/00 $12,686.95 $100,000 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 63 8.29% 07/24/92 07/24104 $8,885.00 GNMA POOL 4734 8.50% 02/01175 01/15/05 $299.73 GNMA POOL 6472 7.50% 07101/75 07/15/05 $1,421.40 GNMA POOL 14376 7.50% 03101!77 03/15/07 $2,778.11 GNMA POOL 23364 9.00% 09101!78 09/15/08 $1,378.65 GNMA POOL 23356 9.00% 11/01/78 11115/08 $2,471.40 $628,000 GEN MOTORS COMMERCIAL PAPER 6.20% 04/05/00 07/05/00 $618,445.58 $631,000 GEN MOTORS COMMERCIAL PAPER 6.30% 04105100 08/03/00 $618,196.87 $1,286,455.00 DAIN RAUSCHER-HONEYWELL $125,000 FHLBC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.041% 11/16/99 07/14117 $31,076.25 $312,000 FNMA-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 11/17/99 08/09/19 $66,407.96 $100,000 FHLMC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 12/15199 03/08129 $10,105.00 $200,000 FHLBC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.15% 12117/99 08/04/17 $48,945.00 $47,833 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 59 8.05% 02/06/92 02/06103 $8,939.02 $45,000 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 59 8.05% 03/09/92 02/06103 $8,377.25 $75,000 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 59 8.05% 03/25/92 02/06/03 $13,850.08 $200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 03/03/99 03103/14 $200,000.00 $200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.150% 04/14/99 04/14/14 $200,000.00 $200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 07/15/99 02/24/14 $193,000.00 $200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 8.00% 08/25/99 08/25/14 $200,000.00 $980,700.56 JOHN G.KINNARD $68,000.00 US TREASURY BOND STRIP 99NV15 6.57% 07/19/94 11/15/99 $48,202.79 $43,000.00 FICO FED STRIP SERIES 1 7.479% 11/09/94 05/11/02 $24,781.96 $500,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.00% 10/29/98 08/20/18 $128,730.00 $1,200,000.00 FED HOME.LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.00% 10/21/98 09/10/18 $307,538.40 $250,000:00 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COU 6.109% 02/18/99 07/07/17 $60,625.00 $550,000.00 FNMA-MEDIUM TERM NOTE 7.950% 11/24/99 06/22/18 $129,228.00 $90,000.00 GREENWOOD TRUST-CID 7.00% 10/06/94 10/12/01 $90,000.00 Time5/17/00 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT APRIL 2000.xIsINVESTI JOHN G.KINNARD (Continued) $100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.28% 06/11198 10/02102 $100,578.13 $100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.065% 07/08198 07/08/02 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.025% 08105/98 08/05/02 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 -FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 6.284% 01114199 01/14/09 $99,750.00 $100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK-CALLABLE 6.390% 05/17/99 05/17/06 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 6.50% 06/02/99 06/02/14 $99,000.00 $100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 6.50% 06/02/99 06/02/14 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 7.40% 06/11/99 06/09/14 $100,000.00 $85,000.00 FNMA-MEDIUM TERM NOTE 8.00% 02/22/00 02/22/10 $85,000.00 $1,673,434.28 DEAN WITTER $100,000.00 HURLEY STATE BANK-C/D 7.15% 09/21/94 09/21/01 $100,000.00 JURAN&MOODY $150,000 GSIF FRMAC SERIES 10 7.50% 03/09/93 03/09/07 $31,726.34 $200,000 FNMA-9334 P/O 7.24% 04/20/93 03125/23 $32,368.10 $200,000 GSIF FRMAC SER 1166.6% 7.00% 04/20/93 04/20/08 $73,701.09 $11,000 FICO STRIPS SERIES 11 9.40% 10/15/93 08/08/06 $7,991.70 $100,000 FRMAC SER 11 MPRG 33.3 7.00% 01/25194 01/25/09 $41,064.51 $50,000 FHLMC MCB SER 1629MB 7.00% 02107/94 01/15/23 $42,193.90 $200,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 7.01% 08/06/97 02101/07 $200,000.00 $300,000 FED HOME LOAN MORT CORP-AAA RATED 6.60% 11/03/97 10/13/04 $302,513.03 $148,000- FHLMC STEP-UP NOTE 7.00% 06/08/98 04/30/13 $148,000.00 $400,000-FNMA SEMI 30/360 6.14% 09/09/98 09110/08• $401,317:10 $200,000-FNMA SEMI 30/360 6.30% 09/10/98 09/10108 $200,498.83 $200,000-FNMA CALLABLE 6.5% 6.50% 09/24/98 01/24108 $298,803.49 $300,000-FNMA SEMI 30/360 5.65% 5.65% 11/12/98 11/12/08 $202,617.34 $150,000-FHLM SEMI 30/360 6.50% 6.50% 02/17/99 02/17/06 $151,301.42 $200,000-FHLM SEMI 30/360 6.50% 6.50% 03/10/99 07/28/08 $199,318.23 $200,000-FHLM SEMI 30/360 7.02% 7.02% 08/17/99 02/17/05 $200,000.00 $2,533,415.08 $309,000 AMSTEL COMMERCIAL PAPER 6.253% 04/18/00 07/14/00 $304,462.34 TOTAL BOOK VALUE $10,661,738.65 -------------------- Time5/17/00 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT APRIL 2000.xIsINVESTI CITY OF ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA May 23, 2000 PAGE(S) I. CALL TO ORDER. II. ROLL CALL. III. .APPROVAL OF MAY 23, 2000 H.R.A. AGENDA. • IV. CONSENT AGENDA ...................... .................. 1 - 3 These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. V. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A. - None. VI. STAFF REPORTS. VII. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS. VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. IX. ADJOURNMENT. • • IV. CONSENT AGENDA. • April 25, 2000 HRA Meeting Minutes. • Claims. • 1 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES 3 April 25, 2000 4 I. CALL TO ORDER. 5 Chairman Cavanaugh called the meeting was called to order at 9:45p.m. 6 II. ROLL CALL. 7 Commissioners present: Chairman Cavanaugh, Vice Chair Thuesen, Commissioners Sparks 8 Horst, and Hodson. 9 Commissioners absent: None. 10 Also present: Executive Director Michael Mornson. 11 III. APPROVAL OF APRIL 25,2000 H.R.A. AGENDA. 12 Motion by Sparks to approve the April 25, 2000 H.R.A. agenda with the following addition: 13 V. General Policy Business of the H.R.A. 14 A. Presentation by Stuart Bonniwell of the results of the 1999 H.R.A. audit. 15 Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT AGENDA. Motion by Thuesen to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, which included: 18 1. Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes of March 14, 2000; 19 2. Claims for the H.R.A. 20 Voting on the Motion: Cavanaugh, Sparks, Thuesen, Hodson. 21 Horst Abstained from Voting Due to Absence at the Meeting. 22 The motion carried. 23 V. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A. 24 A. Presentation by Stuart Bonniwell of the Results of the 1999 H.R.A. Audit. 25 Stuart Bonniwell presented the audit to the Commissioners and reviewed in detail the various 26 funds, balances and expenditures, bond issues, and notes. 27 Motion by Sparks to approve the audit for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as 28 presented by Stuart Bonniwell. 29 Motion carried unanimously. 30 VI. STAFF REPORTS. None. 32 VII. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS. Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes April 25, 2000 Page 2 1 None. 2 VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 3 None. 4 IX. ADJOURNMENT. 5 Motion by Thuesen to adjourn the meeting at 9:55 p.m. 6 Motion carried unanimously. 7 Respectfully submitted, 8 Sue Selseth 9 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Following are the claims for the May 23, 2000 HRA meeting: 1. Land Recycling Service Inc............................$8,500.00 Demolition of 2548 Kenzie Terrace 2. Dorsey & Whitney.LLP.................................. $965.00 Hillcrest Development - Apache Plaze 3. Dorsey & Whitney LLP.................................. $954.95 St. Anthony Shopping Center 4. Dorsey & Whitney LLP.................................. $257.25 St. Anthony Shopping Center 5. Midwest Planning and Design.........................$1,251.07 St. Anthony Shopping Center/Kenzie 6. WSB & Associates ......................................$4,500.00 St. Anthony Shopping Center